I'm curious,what exactly is the Carthaginian and Roman population including their vassal states right now?
There is a lot of empty land though.Having so much land in Southern Gaul but only having a population under 400k means that there's plenty of room to grow.By all means Southern Gaul has some of the most fertile soil of Western Europe.
I'm unaware, but how effectively did people at this point in time search for resources? Or was it more of a "Oh, a farmer broke his plow on a red rock, lets go mine some iron" or a "Lets see if those hills have anything worth digging up","Oh, this forest has some mint wood", "I... I should not have eaten those mushrooms, Sam, your face is ... like a rainbow".
I know it wasn't backwards (Hell, steam power was invented at this point after all), but I'm unaware about how it was done or how active it is. After all, the typical reason people say the Romans wouldn't try again to conquer Germania is that they didn't know if anything was there to justify the cost.More effectively than people think, same with road infrastructure as well. Europe wasn't as empty or as backwards as popular culture suggests.
I know it wasn't backwards (Hell, steam power was invented at this point after all), but I'm unaware about how it was done or how active it is. After all, the typical reason people say the Romans wouldn't try again to conquer Germania is that they didn't know if anything was there to justify the cost.
It could just be local landowners investigating their land, rather than orchestrated attempts to find resources and then open the land to people to stake claims.
What kind of infrastructure do you want?To my understanding,there wasn't much infrastructure when the Americas were settled either.Hmm, I still stand my the strain on infrastructure rather than resources, but the idea of a Greek population boom over the next few generations is an interesting one. Speaking of infrastructure, are we going to see any great road-building in the near future? With the increased population in S.France, and the increasing importance of Atlantic trade, the League will need some fearsome roads.
I'm unaware, but how effectively did people at this point in time search for resources? Or was it more of a "Oh, a farmer broke his plow on a red rock, lets go mine some iron" or a "Lets see if those hills have anything worth digging up","Oh, this forest has some mint wood", "I... I should not have eaten those mushrooms, Sam, your face is ... like a rainbow".
What kind of infrastructure do you want?To my understanding,there wasn't much infrastructure when the Americas were settled either.
I'm talking about high-quality romanesque roads between Massila, Tolosa, and Naucratis - that would like be the most important road that isn't coastal. After that whichever roads are the most militarily important.
So how is a lack of roads right now called a strain in infrastructure?I don't see how it's a big deal that couldn't be surmounted.I'm talking about high-quality romanesque roads between Massila, Tolosa, and Naucratis - that would like be the most important road that isn't coastal. After that whichever roads are the most militarily important.
Especially since the Massaliot mostly use rivers to connect their trading posts. Surely at some point their will be needs for good roads, especially for linking Tolossa which is the heart of their richesSo how is a lack of roads right now called a strain in infrastructure?I don't see how it's a big deal that couldn't be surmounted.
So how is a lack of roads right now called a strain in infrastructure?I don't see how it's a big deal that couldn't be surmounted.
Especially since the Massaliot mostly use rivers to connect their trading posts. Surely at some point their will be needs for good roads, especially for linking Tolossa which is the heart of their riches
I'm curious,what exactly is the Carthaginian and Roman population including their vassal states right now?
Hmm, I still stand my the strain on infrastructure rather than resources, but the idea of a Greek population boom over the next few generations is an interesting one. Speaking of infrastructure, are we going to see any great road-building in the near future? With the increased population in S.France, and the increasing importance of Atlantic trade, the League will need some fearsome roads.
I'm unaware, but how effectively did people at this point in time search for resources? Or was it more of a "Oh, a farmer broke his plow on a red rock, lets go mine some iron" or a "Lets see if those hills have anything worth digging up","Oh, this forest has some mint wood", "I... I should not have eaten those mushrooms, Sam, your face is ... like a rainbow".
More effectively than people think, same with road infrastructure as well. Europe wasn't as empty or as backwards as popular culture suggests.
Yes Gauls were not backwards as popular culture suggests, but still far behind from the Greeks( 3rd century BC)
I agree to a point.They are behind from Greeks in more than urban planning and literature. We are talking for 3rd century BCI would consider them politically lagging by about 100-200 years, and the only main sort of tech they would be behind with would be urban planning and literature. Again its a population density thing.
What's the size of the Massaliot navy?
What powers does the nomarchs of the provinces have?Would be a bad thing if they also have military commands on top civil administration and judicial powers.