I can also give a spoiler about this TL. Anne of Brittany will not become queen of France and the hapsburgs will not get Spain. Okay, that was two spoilers, but whatever.
Oooh! That changes everything about Europe in the 16th Century... Can't wait!
I can also give a spoiler about this TL. Anne of Brittany will not become queen of France and the hapsburgs will not get Spain. Okay, that was two spoilers, but whatever.
I was humorously trying to allude to the potential for a Burgundy under the influence of England, once all is said and done.I don't think there are any english overlords in Burgundy at the moment. Or do you mean Margaret?
Both of them quite prevedibile considering the direction who this TL is takingI can also give a spoiler about this TL. Anne of Brittany will not become queen of France and the hapsburgs will not get Spain. Okay, that was two spoilers, but whatever.
They will still likely get them...Habsburg would have less resources to fight Jagiellons over domination in Central Europe and possibly would not get Czech and Hungarian thrones I guess.
Maximilian lost in 1490 even with Mary's money, despite fact, that Jagiellons fought each other more than they fought against him. Only after retarded Louis II (and birth of Louis II is butterflied away certainly ITTL with existing Burgundy and Anne of Brittany not being Queen of France) died without kids Habsburgs get the thrones, still not without big problems-Hungarian nobility preffered Zapolya over Ferdinand.They will still likely get them...
Mary of Burgundy will still bring a big dowry and likely also an annual income so Maximilian will still have the money for his wars in Central Europe so he
Well Maximilian was able to securing Bohemia and Hungary for his line if Vladislaus died heirless so if he was able to get the same treaty and Vladislaus had no son he will able to take at least Bohemia with its electoral vote (never acquiring Hungary will be only good for the Habsburg) plus in 1490 Maximilian had not anymore Mary’s money and had not yet received the money of Bianca Maria (the only truly big source of money he had as Emperor)Maximilian lost in 1490 even with Mary's money, despite fact, that Jagiellons fought each other more than they fought against him. Only after retarded Louis II (and birth of Louis II is butterflied away certainly ITTL with existing Burgundy and Anne of Brittany not being Queen of France) died without kids Habsburgs get the thrones, still not without big problems-Hungarian nobility preffered Zapolya over Ferdinand.
Vladislaus agreed, because he was fighting against his own brother, thus he needed to secure his Western border. Once John Albert renounced his claims, Vladislaus was not that willing to respect treaty with Max. Austria was hardly military power then, Matthias Corvinus beaten Austrians regulary and made Vienna his residence. When Habsburgs eventually gained Bohemia and Hungary they were much more powerful, with their vast empire encircling France.Well Maximilian was able to securing Bohemia and Hungary for his line if Vladislaus died heirless so if he was able to get the same treaty and Vladislaus had no son he will able to take at least Bohemia with its electoral vote (never acquiring Hungary will be only good for the Habsburg) plus in 1490 Maximilian had not anymore Mary’s money and had not yet received the money of Bianca Maria (the only truly big source of money he had as Emperor)
Well, if Vladislaus still had no son or child Max has good chances to being able to take at least Bohemia...Vladislaus agreed, because he was fighting against his own brother, thus he needed to secure his Western border. Once John Albert renounced his claims, Vladislaus was not that willing to respect treaty with Max. Austria was hardly military power then, Matthias Corvinus beaten Austrians regulary and made Vienna his residence. When Habsburgs eventually gained Bohemia and Hungary they were much more powerful, with their vast empire encircling France.
pun intended?Charles is too bold for his own good.