The March of Albion: A British Empire TL

I’ve been working on this timeline since late 2008 and I’ve finally finished Book One. I’ll be posting one update a week while I continue to write Book Two. Book One covers the world from 1743-1774. The Point of divergence is during the Battle of Dettingen, in which the French are victorious rather than the British.

As a little preface, I always have been fascinated by the world the eighteenth century. Constant conflict between the great European powers; the Age of Enlightenment and the Birth of Capitalism all were the most important things to come out of that age. It is really when the modern world as we know it was born. Therefore it’s the perfect place for a POD in which the world can both be drastically different; but also oddly similar to our own. Those are the kind of timelines I enjoy and that is why I’m writing this one.



Without further ado… I give you “The March of Albion”
 
Part #1: To Capture a King

From “The War of Austrian Succession: Volume I” By Thomas A. Greenling, 1979

The Battle of Dettingen had high expectations on both sides. George II and his son William IV were commanding an Anglo-Austrian force known as the Pragmatic Army. Austria was coming off a long string of defeats at the hands of the French, Bavarians and Prussians but had recently turned the tide, also hopeful for victories ahead, as Bavarian control over Prague began to break down. This loss of control by Franco-Bavarian forces had allowed the British to land in Hanover and seek to rout the French. The French Army was commanded by the Duc De Noialles and the Duc de Gramont. They had quite a strong force and Gramont was actually Noialles’ nephew. Many wanted to contain the British early on and not allow them a hand in central Europe. The French Generals did not know how much this idea would bear fruit for them.

The Duc De Noialles played a cat-and-mouse game with the Pragmatic Army, but finally he knew when and where to strike. He ordered his army to cut the route by the Rhine and Main Rivers by which the Pragmatic Army received supplies from its base in the Austrian Netherlands. There had been no proper supply of bread for a week, when finally in June King George ordered the retreat to begin; West along the road to Hanau and Frankfurt and then North to Flanders. Between that lay the tiny village of Dettingen, where the battle would take place. As the Pragmatic Army marched towards Dettingen, advanced parties reported that the French occupied the village, blocking its path. During the night the French, commanded by the Duc de Gramont, had crossed the river, using bridges of boats across the Main, and held the village and the marshy ground between Dettingen and the hills in strength.

After hearing this news, King George was shocked. He had no idea such a massive French force could have assembled so close to them and moved without them have forewarning. This of course was the brilliance of the Duc De Noialles, a Marshal in one the greatest armies Europe had ever seen, and clearly his genius had shown through in this encirclement. Preparing to give battle, the British, Austrian and Hanoverian troops formed line; the Main River on the left and the wooded Spessart Hills on the right. The regiments took from 9am to midday to form up. This extraordinary length of time must have been due to the inexperience of the regiments and the difficulty of moving from a column of march into battle line and would prove to foreshadow the relative incompetence of the British Army.

Soon after they formed up, the Duc de Noialles’ plan became obvious and struck fear into the Pragmatic Army. The Duc De Gramont held at the Village of Dettingen and nearby streams to prevent their March forward and Noialles would hold with the Artillery, where they could shell them with impunity.

Nevertheless, surrender was not an option. Their capture would not only reverse the course of Austrian victories in Germany, but would give the entire British Army and their King to the French, something that to the British Army couldn’t accept. So despite their terrible position they had to hold out and fight.

At one in the afternoon, Noialles began shelling their formations and causing havoc among the now trapped Pragmatic Army. George knew they in a bad situation but also knew that they had to wait for the French strike first if they had any chance of getting out of this snare. They never knew however, how close they did come to salvation. The Duc De Gramont, being impatient, as he was, nevertheless had to wait in the village until he received word from his brother to attack. After three hours, he desperately wanted to attack. He wrote later that he almost ordered them to strike, thereby allowing the Pragmatic Army a chance to escape. But his horse bucked, threw off his train of thought, and he decided to hold.

After five hours of shelling, with British soldiers dying all around them, George still wanted to wait until the French attacked first, but his own son was getting more impatient. William, the Duke of Cumberland and George II’s second son, was raised as someone who would be military minded and since this was the first major military conflict in Europe since he reached adulthood, this would be his first big battle. He wanted to prove himself, as did all of the other British officers who hadn’t fought in a large-scale war yet. These men, being impatient, decided to follow the young Duke of Cumberland forward against his father’s wishes and provided the break that the Duc de Nioalles had wished.

After seeing William charge forward, the French marshal moved quickly to stop the artillery shelling and ordered the French to charge. The Duc De Gramont received the order he had been waiting eight hours for and charged against the now split and confused Pragmatic Army. The French dragoons charged and scattered the men. The fighting quickly devolved into a blood fest.

After the battle had calmed down and the chaos had subsided, the result of the battle became clear. Gramont, in the fighting allowed the Duke of Cumberland to escape towards Flanders with roughly one third of the Pragmatic Army, with mostly Austrian troops. Noailles, however, captured most of the British troops along with the King of Great Britain himself, George II.

This would prove to be one of the most decisive victories in the virtually perennial Anglo-French conflicts of the time period, but few knew how influential this battle would be, save Noailles and the King …

*

An excerpt from “Voltaire’s Letters: the Genius of France”
… My God, you should have seen it! The sheer audacity of that dreadful march throughout the city couldn’t have surprised me more. Led in the front by the dreadful aristocrat and simply disgusting man, with enough pomp to choke any decent minded person, the Duc de Noialles and beside hundreds of French dragoons, pulled thousands of British soldiers-turned-prisoners through the streets of Paris. Thousands of Parisians, from lawyers and artists to peasants and beggars, all looked out to see the great French victory parade. This great ignorant multitude chanted and foamed themselves in rage in blind support of their people, their army and their king.

But lo, as the march continued past, I saw the key piece to the whole spectacle. The King of Great Britain, a strong and proud monarch, vilified and reprimanded by every peasant and shopkeeper in the streets! And worse yet, it seems as though these impoverished people are vilifying the wrong man, for if he, George II was the true King of France as he claims to be, their lot wouldn’t be nearly as downtrodden as they appear now.

I’ve heard the captured King is going to see the sovereign living in Versailles. I pity him, for George, as the enlightened king I have heard so much of, deserves far better than this. Louis XV doesn’t seem to be especially involved in this conflict. He seems to only care of his perfect hexagonal kingdom and none beyond. Furthermore, he seems to detest warfare in general. This seems to be a ploy by that Duc de Noialles. He seems to be more of a politician than a general and I’m fairly sure he seeks to be a marshal. Well I am quite sure this spectacle will no doubt help his chances. But I wonder it will help France’s chances…

*

From “British Politics: 1688-1800” By William Thomas Jennings

When word reached Parliament of the news from the continent, there was a predictable uproar in the house made by almost everyone. The stories by this time were being exaggerated wildly, much like the story of Jenkin’s Ear that led to the war against Spain only several years earlier, which had roused even Robert Walpole to war. But this was a crisis writ large, a king captured and held for ransom, debased and abused by the French people! It was enough to make any citizen’s blood boil and by this time many in the streets of London were baying for vengeance.

Of course, most of this criticism fell, as it always does, on the Prime Minister himself, Henry Pelham. He, along with his brother had taken the mantle to lead the country after Robert Walpole’s death. They had been against war as Walpole had been for his twenty year long tenure, but Henry had neither the skill nor the charisma to control parliament in the same way Walpole did to preserve the peace. During this crisis, his weak hold over the Parliament buckled and any solution he wanted to propose to bring the king back was met with great resistance. He had been indifferent about the war and strongly in favor of avoiding conflict, now a position vastly unpopular with the people.

Walpole’s traditional enemies took advantage of his inaction during this crisis and hit him hard with criticism. His biggest enemies were known as the Patriot Boys or Patriot Whigs, led by the Earl of Bute, William Pulteney and younger but soon to be famous politicians like William Pitt and George Grenville. They had used the new and now pervasive language of patriotism to attack Walpole and now Pelham, but now this was different. They had to deal with a captured king and a ransom to try to get him back.

Some more radical members in the Patriot Whigs believed that they should let George II rot for awhile and weren’t too keen on sacrificing their own government’s money on saving him. He had after all, supported Walpole and Pelham, while they were supported by his popular son, Frederick the Prince of Wales. The family drama between the King of Great Britain and his firstborn son was told all over the Empire, his expulsion from the court and the political intrigues were unforgettable, with George openly trying to undermine his son’s political alliances with offers of cabinet positions and other bribes. Now however, Frederick was overjoyed by his failure and embarrassment, yet expressed displeasure about the treatment of the British troops involved in the capture and march.

The Patriot Whigs, being split between those who wanted to bail out the king by any means necessary and those who wanted to make him wait until they could strike a better deal. William Pulteney knew that this deadlock was ridiculous and could mess up his chances at running the government. He had been in the opposition against Pelham and Walpole before him and had been staring down that seat of Prime Minister, then known as the Lord of the Treasury, with envy for twenty years. Nothing, not even his own allies could stop him now.

He began, during the chaotic first days of the crisis, to bleed away support from Pelham. With his superior position and his comparable depiction of Pelham as a blubbering fool had him gain support among Pelham’s former supporters within days. By week two of the crisis, Pelham no longer had any meaningful support in Parliament and he subsequently resigned.

Pulteney moved in quickly. By early November, He muscled through an agreement among moderates from both Walpole Whigs and Patriot Whigs to pay a ransom of two hundred thousand pounds to Louis XV in exchange for George II and his accompanying British escorts. He decided to follow it up with an official declaration of war, one that Pulteney unlike his predecessor decided to take seriously…
 
To note on this POD: In OTL, the Battle of Dettingen was won by the British and ultimately William was lulled into a false sense of security; leading to the British losing the European theater in the War of Austrian Succession. ITTL, this increased troop presence that William Pulteney commissions will make ITTL's War of Austrian Succession quite a better time for the British and her allies.

Ultimately what I am aiming for is no Diplomatic Revolution; making Britain allied with Austria and France allied with Prussia in the Seven Years War.

And here is a map of 1743; the year of the POD

TMOA 1748.PNG
 
Very interesting. A bit worried you might be going in a similar direction to a timeline I've been planning! I await the next update...
 
Interesting. Consider me a follower; also, while the title of the TL suggests Britain doing better than OTL some things may make it better for France et al.
 
making Britain allied with Austria and France allied with Prussia in the Seven Years War.

Prussia allied with France. Now this, i want to see. Given their history/antipathy for each other in OTL, i want to see how this develops other wise.

Consider me subscribed.
 
Prussia allied with France. Now this, i want to see. Given their history/antipathy for each other in OTL, i want to see how this develops other wise.

Consider me subscribed.

OTL that only happened because of Prussia's humiliation in the Napoleonic Wars and its meteoric rise in German affairs. Which may be butterflied away here (and with the POD OTL Napoleon won't exist).
 
Part #2: The War That Left Everyone Wanting More

“The War of Austrian Succession” by Johan Strassbourg

After the great French victory at Dettingen and subsequent reversal of the British position in the war, the new Prime Minster, William Pulteney decided to modify the treaty of Worms that his predecessor had been working on. It sought to stabilize the Italian situation as well as box France in. The Prime Minister, now completely committed to war decided to increase the subsidies going to the Italian states as well as to Maria Teresa. He also worked the fleet around to increase the Mediterranean squadron by 15 ships-of-the-lines.

The first of feel the full weight of this new war was Thomas Mathews, the commodore of the Mediterranean squadron of the Royal Navy. He had been shadowing a fleet of French ships and waiting for a formal declaration of war to engage them. Not only did he receive that, but more than he had bargained for, a fleet increase of incredible proportions and orders to destroy the fleet as imminently as possible. He also received news of his people back in his home baying for blood and desperate for a victory.

Thomas Mathews was not the man to give it to them. In the ensuing battle of Toulon, Mathews lined up his fleet incorrectly, due in part to his own incompetence and inexperience, but also to the disorganized and roughshod nature of the Royal Navy at the time. The smaller but better led Franco-Spanish fleet scattered and destroyed many of the British vessels and was able to escape. This battle along with the abysmal performance at the battle of Cartanegra in 1741 paved the way for very serious Royal Navy reforms.

This French victory gave them free reign to land as many troops as they could in northern Italy. The British allied and subsidized Sardinian force led by their king Emmanuel III faced off against a French assault force landed off the victorious fleet in the battle of Villafranca, fought in April of 1744. This was a Pyrrhic French victory, with a causality ratio of two to one and with Sardinian forces retreating to the mountains but ensuring that any French advance into Italy would be futile.

The Pragmatic Army meanwhile had been retreated towards Flanders to lick their wounds and receive British reinforcements. The Duke of Cumberland particular felt personally responsible for his father’s embarrassment and his first defeat on the battlefield at Dettingen. He vowed that he would win a victory for himself and for the glory of his father and he knew where to take his stand.

By early 1745, the greatest French Marshal of his generation, Maurice Saxe was preparing to take Flanders from Austria. In many ways the French political establish saw it as their territory to take. There were many French speakers, it was a rapidly industrializing area and it was a security threat to have a large territory full of Hapsburg troops; perpetual enemies to the Bourbon dynasty. And in their mind, Saxe was the most gifted general take it.

He was soon scheming of how to set another trap for the Pragmatic Army and crush them once and for all. He sent out several smaller armies to besiege the border forts lined along the line separating France and Flanders. In particular, he sent a large force to besiege Mons near where the Pragmatic Army was camping.

Their trap had worked as well as could have hoped. The sieges had diverted thousands of men from the battle that he could now control the terms of himself. The Pragmatic Army was marching to meet him a Tournai and he decided to cut them off at the small village of Fontenoy. They formed up and prepared to fight. The resulting Battle of Fontenoy seemed to play into Marshal Saxe’s plan. The French troops had begun to surround and subsequently destroy the Pragmatic Army. But Marshal Saxe didn’t count on the ‘martial son’ of Britain, The Duke of Cumberland.

He had been humiliated at the battle of Dettingen and he was now the laughingstock of Britain. He had to redeem himself on the battlefield after such a dismal debut. He found himself facing off now with a great French army in the Austrian Netherlands and he knew what to do. The French had positioned themselves on a hill and prepared to again shell the British into submission, but this time was different.

The Duke led twelve regiments (what Saxe would later call ‘the infernal column’) up the hill and charged the weaker lined French infantry on the top of the hill. Although they sustained some causalities getting to the lines, the bloodbath once they reached them was horrific and stirred an intense amount of confusion on both sides. Both sides were tearing each other to pieces in close hand to hand combat, but now it was the Duke that had the trap to spring. While the Marshal was distracted by the infernal column’s charge and redirecting forces to combat them, he lost track of the four foot regiments and two cavalry led by Brigadier Ingoldby. At the Duke’s signal, Ingoldby attacked and took the Redoute D’Eu, a small hill on the right of the French position, ran straight through a token Irish foot regiment and ended up at Saxe’s rear. The route was nearly complete.

Louis XV had come to witness the battle along with Marshal Saxe, but quaked at the sight of the Duke of Cumberland and Ingoldby charging straight for their position. No doubt he was thinking about being captured himself and certainly knew of the vengeance and retribution from the people of ‘perfidious Albion’ that would come with it. He immediately ordered the frustrated army to retreat. Saxe, although devastated, embarrassed and angry, decided to follow orders and limped away from the battlefield.

The Duke of Cumberland and his daring assault with the Pragmatic Army were given accolades across Europe. The Duke was especially given praise, where he was said to redeem himself fully from his follies at Dettingen. They could celebrate; they saved the Austrian Netherlands and ultimately their own pathway back home. While there would be some border skirmishes along the border of Flanders and France, ultimately 1745 and the battle of Fontenoy marked the end of land combat on the western side of the continent.

The Austrians were very gracious for that victory in the face of other events in Silesia. The battle of Hohenfriedburg in 1745 had pitted the best Austrian troops against Frederick II’s highly trained Prussian Army. During the battle, he had utilized every possible cunning technique and fought to standstill. But after a few hours, the smoke cleared and the Beyreuth Dragoons, one of his premier brigades of 1500 men found and opening in the Austrian lines and charged. The Austrian army was broken and with it, any hopes that they could regain Silesia this time around. It was after this battle that many Prussians, as well as many across Europe began styling the King of Prussia, Frederick “The Great”.

While some other battles were being fought along the barrier between France and the Austrian Netherlands with British and Dutch troops to pand large battles in the colonial theaters, overall conflict died down throughout 1746 and the peace process was well on the way by mid 1747...

*

An excerpt from “King George’s War”

The conflict known as the War of Austrian Succession in Europe was known as King Geroge's War in North America by the British subjects there. In many ways, the conflict would prove to confirm the trends that had been developing among the peoples inhabiting the continent.

In 1744, after several inconclusive skirmishes between the French, Indians and British troops, the northern colonies, led by Massachusetts governor William Shirley, planned a fully colonial led assault on the French fort at Louisbourg in what is today Nova Scotia. The governor gathered nearly three thousand men from colonial militias, over twenty canon, as well as several ships donated from all of the northern colonies.

The expedition, as it set out in March of 1744, took on the air of a religious crusade; a violent and militaristic manifestation of the years of virulent anti-French and anti-Catholic feelings brewing throughout New England during this time period. They wanted a victory badly against the French, who were seen the quintessential enemy. They had prepared from all of the stories of the vicious French soldiers that allied themselves with the mysterious and horrifying Indians, waiting for them to come north so they could pounce.

Fortunately for the New Englanders, they were over prepared. The French forces inside Louisbourg were badly underfed and underpaid, making them almost mutinous. Worse, the government back in Paris had forewarning of the colonial led assault on the Fort and decided to do nothing to try and stop of them. All of this coupled together to make the siege decisively easier for the New Englanders.

The French soldiers did not meet them out on the battlefield and survived for a surprisingly long amount of time. After all, with the religious fervor of the invading force, they were certainly fighting for their lives. They held out until June, when the colonial troops overtook the fortress, ransacked and subsequently occupied it. Shirley and the others were quite happy with themselves, produced pamphlets declaring their victory and generally increasing their own popularity and cementing their leadership role. But in this celebration, they became complacent and entirely too arrogant. Throughout the winter, the small garrison the New Englanders had placed in the fortress whittled away to nothing, leaving them defenseless.

So in 1747, six French ships carrying roughly one thousand troops landed near Louisbourg as part of a rescue attempt to recapture the Fort from the British. They were the only survivors of the Battle of Cape Finnistere, where the famous General George Anson destroyed or captured nearly the entire French fleet save those six troop transports. The battle ended any sizeable French naval presence in Europe, as the escorting fleet of thirty five ships were ahnillated by Anson, but they managed to buy enough time to let those troop ships escape and manage to weather the Atlantic trip to Nova Scotia.

The landing took place during the spring, as the battered garrison was emerging from the cold and dreadful winter with nearly half their original numbers. They were quickly sliced to shreds by the superior French force and Louisbourg was retaken and its inhabitants restored in the town. The loss was a shock and near panic broke out in New England. While Boston and the rest of the coastal settlements seemed safe, militias were called up throughout 1747. Everyone was deathly afraid of a French invasion until word of peace arrived. Paranoia, however wasn’t even the most important impact of the retaking of Louisburg.

In northern New York, at the border of the Mohawk Valley, a wealthy landowner named Sir William Johnson decided that enough was enough and decided to organize as many men as he saw fit among the Mohawks he was neighbor to and went on raiding parties on the outskirts of Montréal. While their methods of scalping were considered controversial in their day and morally repugnant in ours, it was quite successful at preventing French counter raids until peace was declared in 1748…

*

An excerpt from “Jacobites: The Rebellions” by William O’Connoll

For years after his father had bestowed the role of the Stuart claimant on him, Prince Charles Edward Stuart, or Bonnie Prince Charlie as his decorators in London called him, had been calling for a French backed invasion of England so he could reclaim the Stuart monarchy for himself and reestablish absolutism. He certainly wasn’t taken seriously in his claims. While the French court hosted him, they patronized him and even allowed him to even claim the throne of France, dating back to Hundred Years War. Bonnie Prince Charlie didn’t really understand that he was being mocked in the process. This above all else showed how silly they considered the Jacobite claimant. They really only kept him on to be a thorn in the side of the British and really only as a scary specter of British unrest and invasion that they could never really raise.

So after the battle of Fontenoy in 1745, Charles thought that, with almost all of the British Army camped in Flanders, the times was ripe for a covert force to land in Scotland and begin another rebellion. Ultimately he wanted to gather enough forces to march on London and depose the Hanoverian ‘pretender’ in his eyes.

But the French and particularly Louis XV, still smarting from the defeat of their best armies at Fontenoy, were very apprehensive. They couldn’t take another defeat and were already in the process of negotiating a peace treaty. While Charles was unhappy that the French, who had previously wanted to help him were now unwilling to. Nevertheless, he wouldn’t let the pessimism of another monarch dictate his chances towards reclaiming his crown. He decided he was going to be raising the funds himself. He gathered extra money from several sympathetic aristocratic friends in Paris and even went as far as pawning off his mothers jewelry to raise enough for an expedition.

Ultimately, he was able to field one ship-of-line called the Elisabeth and fielded over 450 men from the Irish Brigade and set out to Scotland, where Charles would make his stand. He nearly failed however, when a Royal Navy task force spotted him, but luckily, fog that night prevented them from engaging and destroying the ship. So Charlie and the hopes of a Jacobite restoration moved on.

They landed in Scotland in May of 1745 and immediately met with several important Scottish highlander clans who pledged their fealty to Charles and he began to raise an army. Ultimately by Mid-June, he had gathered up enough support to field an army of roughly 5000 men and decided to march inland to take Scotland back for the Stuarts.

The small British garrison led by John Cope heard the uprising was happening and he, while more than a little panicked, decided to go out and meet the Jacobite rebels and defeat them as the rebellion of 1715 were defeated. But with the vast majority of the British Army in Flanders, his troops were relatively inexperienced and not prepared for the force that they would come up against. They marched north and eventually spotted the mostly Scottish Jacobite army and Cope had the advantage with 7000 men, so he decided to engage them at Corriarack Pass in late June.

The resulting battle was, in retrospect, unsurprising. The Scottish force was made up of mostly Highlanders who were renowned for their fierce and unorthodox fighting style, while Cope’s forces were inexperienced and Cope was not a capable commander. The fight ended up quite bloody, with many losses on both the Jacobite and the British government forces, but the ferocity of the Highlanders took their toll. Over half of the British forces died, with the rest scattering southward in retreat with Cope leading.

Charles was delighted and marched with his new army to Edinburgh, where he crowned himself King of Britain in August. Cope reached Liverpool then as well and sent word to London that Scotland was now in full blown rebellion. Parliament, led by Pulteney, was up in arms and quickly sent for troops from those holding down France in the Austrian Netherlands. The Duke of Cumberland mulled over the situation on the continent before choosing his course of action. After Fontenoy, he had fought several skirmishes with the French including the battle of Bruge and other French assault, all of which were too small to actually threaten their position in the Austrian Netherlands. He knew that forces threatening Britian itself should be dealt with severely, but he knew if he removed too many troops, his position could crumble. But in reality, he knew from intelligence reports that the Jacobites did not have a massive support base and inexperienced government troops held their own. So the Duke of Cumberland decided to have 5000 of his soldiers under Henry Huxley, one of his most competent lieutenant generals to deal with the rebellion while the rest of his forces remained to defend the Austrian Netherlands.

Huxley knew that he would have to move quickly to stamp out this rebellion and when they landed, they were very cautious. However, they needn’t be. The new ‘king’ of Great Britain was engaging in irresponsible frivolity since he had taken up court in Edinburgh and because of his adherence to the divine right of kings, made sure that every decision about the army and the lands he ruled was his to make, and his decision only.

Huxley, confident from his role in the victory at Fontenoy, marched his troops noisily northward towards the pretender’s throne at Edinburgh. Charles, now positively ecstatic in his role in the “true king of Great Britain”, decided it was the perfect time to march south and take his rightful English throne for himself as well. He readied his troops and decided to march south to meet them. The armies clashed at Falkirk and Charles was woefully unprepared for the battle ahead of him. Emboldened by his claim of power in Edinburgh and his victory at Corriarack pass, Charles decided to take part in battle himself and make all of the decisions related to the course of the battle. This proved to be disastrous against a very large and well trained force under the command of the not only competent but very skilled Henry Huxley.

Not only was the battle of Falkirk a rout, but Huxley captured Charles and the rest of his band of supporters and had them dragged back to London. There, they were put before a court and sentenced to treason and beheaded. This sparked King George II to enact several draconian laws against the Scottish culture, including banning the Highlander uniform in an effort to stamp out the unique cultural practices of the rebellious areas. He also commissioned a system of military roads to try to establish permanent garrisons so that Scotland could be pacified quickly again. The fear of uprising never again threatened Scotland but the roads would serve to jump start Edinburgh and Glascow's prominence in Britain's industrial revolution...

*

An excerpt from “The Carnatic Wars”

The War of Austrian Succession was known as the First Carnatic War among the myriad of Indian sultanates and kingdoms as well as to the multiple monolithic companies bent on control of the continent. It was a perfect power vacuum in the face of the collapsing Mughal Empire and was a heady time for those willing to grab power. The war was a way for the young and soon to be world famous directors and soldiers fought over the vast riches held in the rich oriental lands of India.

The most ambitious of these commercially minded men was Joseph Francois Dupleix. He was a headstrong, ambitious, but most of all resourceful new head of the French East India Company. He was an expert in building alliances among the princes and sultans growing in their power as the Mughal Empire receded. He constantly had to struggle with a permanently difficult and unhelpful French government. But his skills at hiring and training local regiments as well his audacious demeanor made him and the FEIC a force to be reckoned with during his time as the director.

The First Carnatic War was where Dupleix could really spread his legs and expand the FEIC’s diplomatic and trade dominance in southern India. It is important to note here that while Britain and France were bitter enemies in Europe, their respective trading companies were quite cordial, often trading and cooperating together on commercial ventures. Dupleix harbored no animosity towards the British, but remained ever the opportunist. So when Royal Navy and BEIC ships raided and captured a few French trading vessels, he knew it was time to strike. The struggle began with some skirmishes between the FEIC and BEIC sea fleets, with the British capturing a few French ships and obtaining small victories. Dupleix, however was to call for reinforcements from as far out as Mauritus and prepared to strike at the nerve center of the British in the Carnatic, Madras.

He, using hitherto unseen tactics of regiments of Indian soldiers under French officers, besieged Madras for several months. Ultimately, he starved the city and garrison out and captured the fort in 1746. Several hundred British soldiers were captured, but it was one extremely gifted company man led an escape from the clutches of the FEIC guards and brought word to Fort St. David to the south, in Cuddalore. His name, soon to be broadcast across the British Empire, was Robert Clive. Clive escaped with the knowledge that Dupleix would use his momentum to attack the very fort he was escaping to. Fort St. David was now the only British garrison of any mention in the Carnatic and if Dupleix captured it, he and the FEIC would have unprecedented control of the Carnatic. He went directly to his higher authority in Calcutta; Stringer Lawrence.

Lawrence appealed to the Nawab of the Carnatic, Anwaruddin Muhammed Khan, who was allied to the British at the time. He supplied them with auxiliary troops and defeated the FEIC sepoy forces as they were moving south towards the siege in 1747. Shortly thereafter, word spread that a peace treaty was to be signed between Britain and France, ending the war of Austrian Succession. Dupleix was unhappy of course, but knew what he had to do to ensure French hegemony in the Carnatic…

*

The Treaty of Aix-La-Chapelle

It was signed in 1748, officially ending the War Austrian Succession between all of the major powers of the time (Austria, Prussia, Russia, France and Britain) and returned much to status quo ante bellum, despite many misgivings among the powers. France, arguing its victories in Italy, wanted Parma, presumably under Spanish (and therefore Bourbon) sovereignty. But the defeat at Fontenoy as well as several small victories by King Immanuel of Piedmont ensured that Parma was retained by Austria.

One large concession was the British Fort St. George in Madras. This was masterminded by the founder of the modern French East India Company and was fast becoming the most powerful man on the Indian subcontinent. He had outsmarted the British and was beginning to force them from the Carnatic and this well placed gain would only further cement his control.

Prussian control of Silesia was begrudgingly recognized by Austria and Great Britain but Maria Teresa certainly wasn’t happy. The North American front remained deadlocked as well, with Louisbourg being fought over endlessly and raids taking place on both sides. That was certainly seen as one flashpoint for the Seven Years War, but the scheming of Maria Teresa to have Silesia returned was certainly the cassus belli…
 
Well, there's that. I suppose India will be more divided TTL, and the next round (which, as you imply, lasts as long as OTL) would feature a different alliance.
 
The landing took place during the spring, as the battered garrison was emerging from the cold and dreadful winter with nearly half their original numbers. They were quickly sliced to shreds by the superior French force and Louisbourg was retaken and its inhabitants restored in the town. The loss was a shock and near panic broke out in New England. While Boston and the rest of the coastal settlements seemed safe, militias were called up throughout 1747. Everyone was deathly afraid of a French invasion until word of peace arrived. Paranoia, however wasn’t even the most important impact of the retaking of Louisburg.
So I guess No "Baron of Boston" ITTL.
?Wonder who will be the first American Born to be Knighted ITTL?
He had after all, supported Walpole and Pelham, while they were supported by his popular son, Frederick the Prince of Wales. The family drama between the King of Great Britain and his firstborn son was told all over the Empire, his expulsion from the court and the political intrigues were unforgettable, with George openly trying to undermine his son’s political alliances with offers of cabinet positions and other bribes. Now however, Frederick was overjoyed by his failure and embarrassment, yet expressed displeasure about the treatment of the British troops involved in the capture and march.
Yea -- whe don't see enuff of Prince Fredrick on this board.
 
So I guess No "Baron of Boston" ITTL.
?Wonder who will be the first American Born to be Knighted ITTL?

It'll be a few years but there will be royal recognition of Americans soon...

Yea -- whe don't see enuff of Prince Fredrick on this board.

This won't be the last of him. He wont be playing cricket in 1751 and will thus survive. But I won't give away too much.
 
Nicksplace27

Interesting. It sounds like a couple of nasty shocks will prompt a stronger British reaction. Also avoiding the reversal of the diplomatic alliances that occurred OTL. That could make for a radically changed world as this suggests that Prussia will not hold Silesia. If fact if Russia under Czar Paul is as hostile to Prussia as OTL Prussia itself could be permanently reduced to a 3rd rank power. We could enter a revolutionary war period, if that still occurs, with Austria clearly dominant in Germany.

The fact that Britain does better in Europe after the check and the colonial forces in N America fail badly at Louisburg seems to hint that the rebels won't be as successful later on, but have to see how that develops.

Its also interesting to see the Duke of Cumberland as a national hero rather than the source of controversy.

Steve
 
Prince Charlie wouldn't claim to be King of Britain. The Jacobites considered the Act of Union a Hannoverian invention, and were instead separately Kings of England and Scotland.
 
Prince Charlie wouldn't claim to be King of Britain. The Jacobites considered the Act of Union a Hannoverian invention, and were instead separately Kings of England and Scotland.

Queen Anne, Stuart, was the monarch of Great Britain in 1707. They (The Jacobites) would support the Act of Union.
 
Last edited:
Top