However, Though you earn your bread by making maps I think that doesn't give you the right to effectively (you might didn't wrote it but you wrote it a way that implies this) to downgrade our community-project by calling it wrong and us being slow cowards not able to finish a map.Speaking as someone who, for the time being at least, makes maps as part of her day job (and no, I don't mean "how to drive from A to B"), I most humbly beg to differ.
I won't say this mbam is wrong. But assuming it is a faithful but higher-resolution copy of qbam, it would be using the same map projection. In which case, it uses a projection in which the lines of longitude in the western hemisphere are closer together than the lines of longitude in the eastern hemisphere. If that is the intention, then it is perfectly correct. I don't think it ever was though. If it isn't the design intention, then the qbam is wrong.
My take is that you as a community have made a very accurate scaling-up of an incorrect (in that the qbam was widely believed to have lines of longitude evenly spaced) map.
Depends on what you want to send.Can I send hear not only the m-bam maps, but maps, that have been done in the same way, as m-bam?
![]()
Venezuela, Dutch Antilles, Tobago-Trinidad and Grenada
Pardon?
Will add both connection and correction later, ain't at home rnI mean that there are no points on this to be connected to the rest of the map
But with first level divisions only I think. The original goal of the MBam was second and even third + level divisions.Australia is finished btw
There is a seperate historical M-bam thread for thatCan we see the HRE (and its members) at the 1400s and in 1648?