I have a serious problem with this statement. Rodolfo Graziani was the general that overseed the worst defeat of the Italian Army in WW2 (Operation Compass) and was then relieved of all commands and put under penal investigation for its actions. Graziani remained mostly inactive for the next two years and during his time in Italy, he played a marginal role in suppressing the Italian anti-fascist movement. I can see him being given another command after the war but it would only be symbolical and not an important front: maybe in Greece or Albania but nothing more.Rodolfo Graziani, Emilio de Bono, Ugo Cavallero, Cesare de Vecchi, Italo Balbo, Enzo Garibalti, Carlo Scorza, Galeazzo Ciano, Alessandro Pavolini, and Roberto Farinacci were some of the main figures of the Italian Fascist Government, and they were quite a distinct group of individuals all seeking power around Il Duce and/or his future position after his death. Graziani was one of the leading military figures of the war, besides of course the First Marshall of the Empire Benito Mussolini.
The thing is that the war did not go much like the real war, the Italian army had either more soft defeats (Pushed to Epirus in Greece and didn’t get pushed back all the way to Albania), or real life operations and defeats did not happen or happened differently. Graziani (like much of the Italian high command), is not really a very competent commander but he’s loyal and useful for Mussolini’s support inside the Military. For instance, Wilhelm Keitel was not the best commander of the OKW but was still put in charge by Hitler because he was loyal, sometimes dictatorships prefer to favor more control than more competence.I have a serious problem with this statement. Rodolfo Graziani was the general that overseed the worst defeat of the Italian Army in WW2 (Operation Compass) and was then relieved of all commands and put under penal investigation for its actions. Graziani remained mostly inactive for the next two years and during his time in Italy, he played a marginal role in suppressing the Italian anti-fascist movement. I can see him being given another command after the war but it would only be symbolical and not an important front: maybe in Greece or Albania but nothing more.
I know that he was the most loyal Italian Army General to Mussolini but even if the Italian Army was slightly more prepared than in OTL the Italians would have been defeated no matter what in TTL Operation Compass. Maybe their losses are less than in OTL (130.000 captured or killed)maybe 80.000 it is still a very big defeat at the end of a significantly smaller force is still something that is very embarrassing. In OTL Mussolini despised him so much that even considered putting him under house arrest and Farinacci openly spoke of him being a coward so I don't really think that Graziani would make any significant comeback. Giovanni Messe would have been a more appropriate person to receive a promotion since he was and is still considered the best Italian general of WW2.The thing is that the war did not go much like the real war, the Italian army had either more soft defeats (Pushed to Epirus in Greece and didn’t get pushed back all the way to Albania), or real life operations and defeats did not happen or happened differently. Graziani (like much of the Italian high command), is not really a very competent commander but he’s loyal and useful for Mussolini’s support inside the Military. For instance, Wilhelm Keitel was not the best commander of the OKW but was still put in charge by Hitler because he was loyal, sometimes dictatorships prefer to favor more control than more competence.
Messe was competent, but was he loyal to Mussolini?I know that he was the most loyal Italian Army General to Mussolini but even if the Italian Army was slightly more prepared than in OTL the Italians would have been defeated no matter what in TTL Operation Compass. Maybe their losses are less than in OTL (130.000 captured or killed)maybe 80.000 it is still a very big defeat at the end of a significantly smaller force is still something that is very embarrassing. In OTL Mussolini despised him so much that even considered putting him under house arrest and Farinacci openly spoke of him being a coward so I don't really think that Graziani would make any significant comeback. Giovanni Messe would have been a more appropriate person to receive a promotion since he was and is still considered the best Italian general of WW2.
It is merely a poll of who you think will succeed, the popular choice does not necessarily have to win (after all its fittingly about who would be leader of a totalitarian State). Himmler actually is the one with the most power individually compared to the others, the SS is incredibly powerful after the victory in the East, they have a well-equipped army of their own and millions of slaves under their control.I voted Himmler, simply because no one has thus far. It looks like Speer will come out on top, though.
I know that he was the most loyal Italian Army General to Mussolini but even if the Italian Army was slightly more prepared than in OTL the Italians would have been defeated no matter what in TTL Operation Compass. Maybe their losses are less than in OTL (130.000 captured or killed)maybe 80.000 it is still a very big defeat at the end of a significantly smaller force is still something that is very embarrassing. In OTL Mussolini despised him so much that even considered putting him under house arrest and Farinacci openly spoke of him being a coward so I don't really think that Graziani would make any significant comeback. Giovanni Messe would have been a more appropriate person to receive a promotion since he was and is still considered the best Italian general of WW2.
I don't want to sound offensive but both of you miss the mark here: if you want a loyal fascist general that however is not compromised by catastrophic war losses then your person is Ettore Bastico. He initially commanded a blackshirt Division in the Second Italo-Abyssinian War, then was selected as commander-in-chief of the Italian volunteer corps in Spain and after the Spanish Civil war became the Governor of the Italian Aegean Islands. In July 1941 Bastico was named Governor-General of Italian Libya and commander-in-chief over all Axis forces in North Africa. As Erwin Rommel's superior in the North African campaign, Rommel's plans had to be first approved by Bastico. Bastico was even promoted to Marshal of Italy (Maresciallo d'Italia) on 12 August 1942.Messe was competent, but was he loyal to Mussolini?
This is exactly what I wanted to say. IMAO Bastico is a better option than Gariboldi for the simple facts he was a former Blackshirt militaman and then served in the main Italian front of the war: North Africa.The problem with Graziani is that he was too heavily compromised by the defeat in late 1940/early 1941 and was only called back to action because he was the only Marshal of Italy that remained loyal to Mussolini. ITTL his fate could be even worse than in OTL since it is very likely that the Italian propaganda machine would place almost all the blame for the defeat of the Italian 10th Army squarely on him (which to be honest a correct analysis of what happened).
The Philippines would be independent as the Tydings-McDuffie Act specified that the Philippines would gain independence after a ten-year period.Made an (assumed) map of the world in the year 1950. Correct me if there is anything wrong (probably missed a few details or so)
View attachment 712130
Italy is also missing Nice, Savoy and EpirusDjibouti is Italian otherwise excellent map and British Somalia was given to the Italian
too bad, I still hope to see the world of Speer, and hope you don't choose HimmlerIt is merely a poll of who you think will succeed, the popular choice does not necessarily have to win (after all its fittingly about who would be leader of a totalitarian State). Himmler actually is the one with the most power individually compared to the others, the SS is incredibly powerful after the victory in the East, they have a well-equipped army of their own and millions of slaves under their control.
A good map from what I can see, but perhaps you could change the color of the US client states or show outlines of their colors; right now it looks like Japan, Korea, and the Philippines are all American states.map of the world in the year 1950
I don't want to sound offensive but both of you miss the mark here: if you want a loyal fascist general that however is not compromised by catastrophic war losses then your person is Ettore Bastico. He initially commanded a blackshirt Division in the Second Italo-Abyssinian War, then was selected as commander-in-chief of the Italian volunteer corps in Spain and after the Spanish Civil war became the Governor of the Italian Aegean Islands. In July 1941 Bastico was named Governor-General of Italian Libya and commander-in-chief over all Axis forces in North Africa. As Erwin Rommel's superior in the North African campaign, Rommel's plans had to be first approved by Bastico. Bastico was even promoted to Marshal of Italy (Maresciallo d'Italia) on 12 August 1942.
Italo Gariboldi also comes to mind: he served in Abyssinia, North Africa (where he was able to keep the shattered 10th Italian Army together long enough to allow for German and Italian reinforcements to arrive in Tripoli) and then was transferred to Russia since he did not get on very well with Rommel. He was also personally awarded the Knight's Cross of the Iron Cross by Adolf Hitler for his leadership of Italian forces in the Battle of Stalingrad.
The problem with Graziani is that he was too heavily compromised by the defeat in late 1940/early 1941 and was only called back to action because he was the only Marshal of Italy that remained loyal to Mussolini. ITTL his fate could be even worse than in OTL since it is very likely that the Italian propaganda machine would place almost all the blame for the defeat of the Italian 10th Army squarely on him (which to be honest a correct analysis of what happened).
This is exactly what I wanted to say. IMAO Bastico is a better option than Gariboldi for the simple facts he was a former Blackshirt militaman and then served in the main Italian front of the war: North Africa.
Made an (assumed) map of the world in the year 1950. Correct me if there is anything wrong (probably missed a few details or so)
View attachment 712130
does SS-gotenland exist or not?
A good map from what I can see, but perhaps you could change the color of the US client states or show outlines of their colors; right now it looks like Japan, Korea, and the Philippines are all American states.
Who are the Factions in Reich??
Why didn't belgium revert to its pre-WW2 borders?That’s a very well done map, the corrections I would do: Make Ukraine smaller (Muscovy has more territory near the south and RK Ukraine doesn’t have access to the frontier), Free France controls Equatorial Guinea from Spain, Djibouti, Somaliland, Nice, and Savoy are Italian, give some parts of Epirus to Albanian Italy. The British should have Dutch Guinea but India is Independent as a Unified Dominion (for now, the “Unified” part will certainly not last long), and the Chinese Civil War will still be finished in 1950, also, the Arab part of Palestine is part of Jordan, not independent.