Iberian Peninsula next? (with a small portuguese participation in the Pacific War)?
And who would trust their word?Nazis could be very pragmatic at times.
Since he barely gave the German American Bund the time of day, I don't think he'd throw his weight behind a group as decentralized and radical as the KKK.The problem in this part is that even for the Nazis, the KKK is a bunch of rabble-house weirdos in hoods and torches. If the Reich would ever support them it would be out of pragmatism, and you don’t exactly expect Hitler to be pragmatic.
Todt still suffered his “accident” and his position went to Speer, he is not only the grand architect in charge of Hitler’s expensive vanity projects, but also represents the Corporate interests of the growing Industrial conglomerates such as IG Farbien, the Reichswerke (after Göring’s death), Krupp, Siemens, etc.Also, what became of Fritz Todt ITTL as his death was a plane crash which could be easily butterflied away? He could be a potential "dark horse" candidate if the crash was butterflied away.
Honestly, having Fritz Todt's plane crash still be a thing ITTL was kinda a waste of potential as he could have been a "dark horse" candidate for Fuhrer here.
Voted for Georing. Has a lot of influence.
Put Goering instead of Another Candidate.
That’s if you buy into his “The good Nazi technocrat” personality that he crafted for himself after the war, although he’s less of a radical compared to most the other options.Speer it is one of the least worst choices for Germany (along with the Wehrmacht) and will be stable afterwards, not to mention in the 1970s
The fact he's at least partially responsible for German war crimes just makes him more of a Khrushchev-esque figure to me.That’s if you buy into his “The good Nazi technocrat” personality that he crafted for himself after the war, although he’s less of a radical compared to most the other options.
Well if you call organizing the largest slave labor in modern history as “partially” responsible, then yes, he’s more like Khrushchev, although I would consider Bormann more of a Khrushchev-like figure if it comes to personal scheming and power games.The fact he's at least partially responsible for German war crimes just makes him more of a Khrushchev-esque figure to me.
On that note, I would say Goering is much like Zhdanov in the sense of "presumptive successor dying prematurely and screwing up the succession".Well if you call organizing the largest slave labor in modern history as “partially” responsible, then yes, he’s more like Khrushchev, although I would consider Bormann more of a Khrushchev-like figure if it comes to personal scheming and power games.
Honestly just having someone go for some mild reforms might do the Reich some good.Either by the hand of some moderate innocuous Party figure or potentially by the Wehrmacht who instate something more manageable and less fanatical.Well if you call organizing the largest slave labor in modern history as “partially” responsible, then yes, he’s more like Khrushchev, although I would consider Bormann more of a Khrushchev-like figure if it comes to personal scheming and power games.
it's still better than the proto-medieval, pagan world and the obscurantism of our "dear" hated HimmlerThat’s if you buy into his “The good Nazi technocrat” personality that he crafted for himself after the war, although he’s less of a radical compared to most the other options.
Or Heydrich's Nazi Securocratic 1984.it's still better than the proto-medieval, pagan world and the obscurantism of our "dear" hated Himmler
Where was it covered? I didn't find it anywhere.Hermann Göring died in 1945 shortly after the creation of the Linz Pakt due to an assassination, “apparently” by Polish partisans. In response the Reich destroyed Warsaw and turned it into Hermannstadt
The Neuordnung chapter.Where was it covered? I didn't find it anywhere.