Harold Ford was only elected to the Senate in 2002. Plan J takes precedent. By the way: RFK made that remark to James Baldwin in June 1963. It is now April 2007. Time's up. Also irrelevant when the black candidate was running against his son, and from the wrong wing of the party to boot.
Well Ford had already been in the House since '97, so that's six years as congressmen and four active years in the Senate before he would have begun running in 2007. So ten years of elected office under the good graces of the popular Incumbent President should have set Ford up for the nomination. And it wasn't really all that suprising that you chose Hillary, but IDK ITTL I feel like the Democratic party has become to cartelized. You have the entire fate of party members career's consolidated in the hands of the Kennnedy's and the Clintons.
As for the 40 year perdiction thing, I don't know why you decided to get Obama out of the way so early in 2000. When a SCOTUS nod to appeal the real Democratic Wing of the Party probably would have sufficed once Bob Jr. got into office. CMB had no chance of winning, because it was fordained that Kennedy's always win. I think Douglas Wilder, being a moderate-to-conservative Democrat would have been a way to shift the leadership of the party to new hands with keep the part Ideologically coaherent in the Federalist mode.
But what's done is done I say, but I do think an Anti-Dynasticrat sentiment will be particularly huge in this election especially knowing Hillary's tendancy to act like she "inherited the nomination". I actually think Jindal has a decent shot at winning this thing. If he runs on more of a Libertarian Ron Paulike platform(Which places fiscal conservatisim and small government over the GOP preoccupation with Social issues), using his youth and history making candidacy to swoo Generation Y Voters, hell be able to beat all the other three candidates. This could be the start of a new party system, and the end of "The Age of Kennedy"
