The History of the North Star Republic

Sounds like a plan.

Sure thing! I hate to disappoint and mislead people, so I apologize, but I'd rather keep the context of the story within the bounds I've already established rather than "break character" and reveal the points of divergence that have occurred already. I also find that this forms a sense of anticipation and provides a brief cliffhanger, which attracts readers and can make the story much more interesting as people wait for new additions and chapters, especially since (I'm assuming) the majority of people are unfamiliar with the subject matter history.

I suppose I can reveal just one: du Luht never returned to Minnesota after negotiating for Father Hennepin's release. I hope you're looking forward to seeing how his return in this timeline (and the foundation of the fictional "Fort du Luht" as a result) changes the course of history! :D I do promise, however, that the divergence points will become pretty obvious shortly, and you will not need my help deciphering them.
 
Last edited:
Looking for some feedback!

All of the differences between this history and OTL will be discussed at the end of the history if there's interest in knowing. For now the chapters will remain strictly "in character" until then. I will be discussing international affairs eventually as they come.

A nicely begun and interesting story. I'm looking forward to seeing how things progress. If I may, I'd like to suggest that you use footnotes to show the various PODs and deviations form OTL, both early on and later as you name cities and rivers and what-not differently in TTL. This would be helpful for your readers while not breaking the in character flow of the story. Thanks.
 
A nicely begun and interesting story. I'm looking forward to seeing how things progress. If I may, I'd like to suggest that you use footnotes to show the various PODs and deviations form OTL, both early on and later as you name cities and rivers and what-not differently in TTL. This would be helpful for your readers while not breaking the in character flow of the story. Thanks.

All in due time, my friend. I think after the timeline is complete I will most likely be constructing an Appendices which will discuss in detail by chapter the differences between both history as we know it and history as the Republic knows it. I hope I'm not being too stubborn in my ways, but as the history progresses I'd like to keep the integrity of the history by not including any reference to deviations from an original timeline. That being said, I'm not excusing their introduction to be discussed and questioned, so if you ever have any questions, feel free to ask and I promise I will respond.

Regardless the divergence point most important to remember so far has been the return of du Luht to Minnesota in 1700 and his establishment of a permanent trading post/settlement on Lake Superior. I promise a much larger and more important POD will be occurring shortly.
 
Part I, Chapter VIII: The Louisiana Purchase


The emergence of the United States as an independent nation in North America after the Treaty of Paris in 1783 had changed the political boundaries of the continent in a matter of only a few short years. The acquisition of all lands east of the Mississippi River with the exception of Canada by the United States due to its victory had also lead to the creation of the new "Northwest Territory," and opened an entirely new frontier to American exploration and expansion. The regions of Minnesota, Wisconsin, and the upper peninsula of Michigan in particular had sparked considerable interest to American expeditionary leaders following the nation's independence due to the area's still profitable fur trade, and this was emphasized by the large amount of monetary debt that the nation had accumulated, which still remained at large and lacked the means to be reduced as a result of America's lengthy and expensive revolution. The regions of the Upper Midwest, however, were still relatively remote as they were located at the farthest extent of the country's northwestern territorial limits, and the amount of Native Americans that voiced hostility to further European and American colonization attempts were still active in between the regions and the Ohio River Valley. To complicate matters further, the British still maintained a sizable garrison of forts and soldiers around the lower peninsula of Michigan, land that was regarded as American in the Treaty of Paris, and also took great measures to monopolize their control of the Saint Lawrence Riverway and the Great Lakes. These issues not only denied American accessibility to the Upper Midwest, but also once again listed the priority of capitalizing on the region's future settlement and fur trade as relatively low in comparison to much broader, sweeping issues. Great Britain's refusal to withdraw from American territory in due haste meant that the Upper Midwest as a result still remained inaccessible, which would continue throughout the close of the 18th century until the signing of the Jay Treaty in 1796, which finally lead to the removal of almost all of Great Britain's forts and garrisoned soldiers in land regarded as American.

Jay_Treaty.jpg

Even though the young United States controlled all land east of the Mississippi with the exception of Canada, significant issues with Great Britain regarding sovereignty that were not resolved until 1796 prohibited their movement westward.

Growth of the American economy throughout the 1790's due to peaceful trade with Great Britain lead to prosperity for the young nation, and as a result expeditions and exploratory parties had begun to form along the East Coast, mostly funded directly by the United States government, and then began journeys westward. The signing of the Jay Treaty in 1796 however had also made privately funded expeditions plausible and less dangerous, and by late 1796 several exploratory parties were already underway in both the Michigan and Illinois area. The Upper Midwest saw a small amount of growth in the late 1790's as a direct result, as Fort Beauharnois in Minnesota and the Green Bay colony in Wisconsin were popular destinations and resting points for many American explorers. Some Americans, after the completion of their expeditions, migrated and settled in these areas, where they took part in the profitable and alluring fur trade, and by 1800 a handful had permanently settled in the Green Bay and Prarie du Chien colonies as well as Fort Beauharnois and Fort du Luht. By 1800, the total amount of settlers in the upper peninsula of Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin equaled roughly 1,500 people, of which 100 were permanent American settlers.

Frontier_Settlement.jpg

Renewed expeditions in the Northwest Territory throughout the early 19th century resulted in a slight increase in American migration to the Minnesota and Wisconsin colonies.

Across the Atlantic, the opening years of the 19th century had also seen drastic changes in the political climate of Europe. In 1800, Napoleon Bonaparte and his newly founded First Republic, which had been forged out of the fires of the French Revolution, had disposed of the former French monarchy and had begun to apply increasingly hostile pressure towards Spain, particularly with threats of a possible French invasion of the Iberian Peninsula. In response, Spain agreed to sign the Third Treaty of San Ildefonso, which secretly negotiated for the return of the Louisiana Territory to New France. This provided a large "stepping stone" for Napoleon to counter the ever-growing colony of New Spain. However, France's ability to counter Spanish expansion in the New World was quickly regarded as an impossible endeavor, and instead capitalized on American eagerness to expand west of the Mississippi. Napoleon had already accumulated a large amount of debt due to his rapid militarization and resulting wars in Europe, and when the Americans offered to buy New Orleans and the surrounding Gulf Coast region from France, Paris underwent considerable deliberation. France instead decided to offer the entire territory to the United States. Thomas Jefferson - the President of the United States - and his cabinet quickly jumped at the opportunity, and in 1803 bought the territory from France in the famed "Louisiana Purchase," doubling the size of the United States overnight.

North_America1803.png

The political boundaries of the United States, in blue, Great Britain, in red, and Spain, in olive, in 1803. The Louisiana Purchase effectively doubled the size of the United States overnight.

The acquisition of a vast amount of new territory west of the Mississippi and increasingly positive trade relations between the United States, Great Britain and France lead to notable reinvestment into expeditions and surveyors from both the American government and private enterprise. The still ongoing fur trade in Minnesota and Wisconsin had also reinvigorated American interest, and in 1806, the United States commissioned and ordered the young Zebulon Montgomery Pike, Jr. to lead an exploratory party into the Upper Midwest to find the source of the Mississippi River and to interact with the European and American settlers living there. Pike, an already promising career officer, lead his expedition west and then turned upriver, arriving in Minnesota in the summer of 1806, and stopped briefly at Fort Beauharnois before continuing his expedition north. His party found several watersheds and lakes that all served as viable candidates as the true "source" of the Mississippi, and upon mapping and surveying them turned east to rest and refit at Fort du Luht, where they would then begin their return journey back to Ohio - where their expedition had started - to report their findings. However, as the winter of 1806 began, Pike quickly realized that travel overland in the harsh Minnesota climate was impractical, and instead his party bivouacked in du Luht for roughly two months, where they waited for the emergence of spring. The party's temporary residence in the region later caused Pike to become acquainted with Stephen Carver - the eldest of Jonathan Carver's descendants and the most affluent permanent settler in the Fort du Luht settlement - and the two became good friends. Pike and his party broke camp in March of 1807 after the winter had subsided, and they returned to the Ohio River Valley by summer. Pike's travels in Minnesota and the interaction he had with many of the American and European settlers there in du Luht and Beauharnois had left a profound impact on the young junior officer, and the appealing fur trade and the vast amount of freshwater lakes in the territory would later be the source of inspiration for the writing of his first book, "The Exploration of the North Woods and Upper Mississippi River Valley," which was published in 1807 and described through memory and journal entries his natural findings and the culture of Minnesota in detail. As evidence of the book's popularity, it was later translated into French, German and Dutch editions between 1807 and 1810, and Pike, most likely under influence from continued correspondence with Carver, vowed to return to the territory following the conclusion of his military career.

Pikes_Expedition.jpg

Pike's expedition and his published writing, "The Exploration of the North Woods and Upper Mississippi River Valley," and his continued correspondence with Stephen Carver that resulted all left a profound impact on the junior officer.

Pike's findings and his published works, in combination with the natural landscape, the fur trade and the still friendly and stable relations with the Ojibwa and Sioux Natives in the area lead to a surge in migration to the territory between 1808 and 1811, mostly from American Catholics. The establishment of the Catholic faith in the upper Midwest due to early French settlement and the active missionary work and churches in Fort Beauharnois, Prarie du Chien, Fort du Luht and Green Bay appealed strongly to many American Catholics, who were regarded as minorities in the East and South and had undergone slight religious persecution following the end of the American War of Independence. Protestant elected officials in the United States also dominated the early politics of the nation, but as a result of the remote location of the territories, the United States lacked any form of government presence west of Michigan aside from the occasional contracted or military exploratory expedition. The relative distance between the territory and the seats of American government in Washington, New York, Philadelphia and the "territorial government" stationed in Ohio made the Upper Mississippi River Valley highly attractive to Catholic immigrants, and as a result, between the years of 1808 and 1811, the Upper Midwest saw over 600 American Catholics migrate to its territories, with 400 settling in Minnesota alone around the Fort Beauharnois area, quadrupling its population in little more than 4 years. The Ojibwa and Sioux natives saw little disadvantage to this migration, as profits from the fur trade usually climbed in conjunction with rising white settlement, and the expansion of white forts and fur trading posts were never completely closed to negotiation when they threatened lands the Natives held as sacred, mostly since the Natives still far outnumbered them and the settlers could not reasonably afford relations to depreciate.

Migration1810.jpg

Between the years of 1808 and 1811, the Upper Midwest saw over 600 American Catholics migrate to its territories, 400 of which settled in Minnesota alone around the Fort Beauharnois area.

On an international scale, however, the late 1800's saw the United States and Great Britain's diplomatic relationship slowly take a turn for the worse. British efforts to secure victory against Napoleon in Europe had become elusive, the impressment of American sailors into the Royal Navy was widely being used as a tool to help curb obvious manpower shortages in an ongoing naval war in the Atlantic, and the border between the United States and British Canada was still undefined throughout the Saint Lawrence River region, as both nations regarded it as respective sovereign territory. Pike, now a lieutenant colonel, was rushed back to the East in preparation for a declaration of war against Britain, and by 1812, the United States had delivered it to London. The ensuing conflict would drastically shift the spheres of influence in North America - and change the world forever.

War_Of1812_Prelude.jpg

The war in Europe, growing tensions between Great Britain and the United States, and disputed land territory ultimately lead to the War of 1812.

Part II, Chapter I: The War of 1812
 
Last edited:
Part II, Chapter I: The War of 1812


The War of 1812 began on June 18th, 1812, as American diplomats in London delivered the official declaration with consent from the American legislature and the President of the United States, James Madison, to Great Britain. Multiple factors, most stemming from the Napoleonic Wars in Europe, contributed to the eventual outbreak of hostilities, most importantly the impressment of American sailors into the Royal Navy and the restriction of trade to France, whom America supported, through active British intervention in the Atlantic and the Bay of Biscay. The growth of America's territory throughout the early years of the 19th century had also swayed the balance of power in the continent dramatically, and as a result were a significant threat to the British colony of Canada, and to the British monopolization of the Great Lakes and the Saint Lawrence River. The international situation in Europe also allowed the United States a unique opportunity to cement its supported desire to expand in the continent unmolested, as Great Britain was also busy devoting assets to fight Napoleon in both Spain (in the Peninsular War) and in other nations of mainland Europe, which remained a much larger threat to British national security than the United States.

Impressment.gif

Impressment of American sailors into the Royal Navy due to manpower shortages and restriction of trade to France played as key factors in the build-up to the War of 1812.

The United States military had already designed plans to invade Canada and to seize the important key cities of Montreal, Quebec and York by summer, which President Madison regarded as a challenging but practical endeavor if the standing regulars could be supplemented by state militias. By July, however, only a few thousand could be mustered by the proposed timeline to invade Canada, and this matter was made worse by many New England states who refused to lend their state militias to the overarching offensive war effort, since many of the states in the northeast had been generally opposed to the war. Nonetheless, by the second week of July, General William Hull, also the governor of the Michigan Territory, led his force of only 1,000 poorly equipped and untrained militiamen across the Detroit River into Canada, marking the first major campaign of the war. Early success marked by the capture of the Canadian town of Sandwich and victories in small skirmishes were soon after discarded, however, and Hull found himself soon retreating back to Detroit due to logistics difficulties and regular harassment from Canadian and British regulars. By August, Hull and his forces were surrounded, and he was forced to surrender to the British counteroffensive, sacrificing the vast majority of the Michigan Territory as a result. In October, a renewed American offensive into Niagara also failed despite the loss of Canada's most esteemed general, Isaac Brock, and the course of the war had devolved into a poorly conducted stalemate.

Death_Of_Brock.jpg

Despite the death of Canada's most esteemed general, Issac Brock, failed American offensives into Niagara and the capture of Detroit by the British had lead to a stalemate by the end of 1812.

As the winter of 1812 subsided, however, a renewed American offensive in the spring of 1813 along the shores of Lake Ontario produced better results. Zebulon Pike, now a brigadier general, had lead his regiment and taken York in April, burning its parliamentary buildings and looting its library. The rapid Canadian retreat had also spared its magazine from being properly dismantled, and the capture of it allowed the Americans to consolidate their gains in Ontario and regroup to eventually push onward to Kingston, which was regarded as much more strategically valuable. Pike's success at York and natural command ability also saw his promotion to commander of a division under General Dearborn in the Ontario theater, and his ability to provide the United States with its first major victory in the war was held in high regard. In May, these gains were also capitalized by the seizure of Fort George on the northern end of the Niagara River. Pike's aggressive leadership lead to the capture of nearly 700 British and Canadian regulars following the Fort's capture when his much older superior, Dearborn, who was in command of the entire theater, failed to take advantage of the British retreat. Pike, without orders, instead chose to pursue the hastily retreating enemy in direct violation of Dearborn's orders, who was in ill health and remarkably overweight. Dearborn's inefficiency during the Ontario Campaign ultimately lead to his removal and eventual retirement from military duty, and Pike was instead nominated to command the entire theater upon his superior's removal, which he graciously accepted. In June, Pike again went on the offensive, seizing Queenston and Thorold, Ontario simultaneously.

York_Ontario.jpg

The capture of York in the spring of 1813 and the subsequent American victories at Fort George, Queenston and Thorold had resulted in the removal of General Henry Dearborn and the promotion of Zebulon Pike to the commanding American general of the Ontario campaign.

By August, the combined Ontario and Niagara campaigns had proved to be a remarkable success, in great credit to the leadership of Pike. The Americans were within striking distance of Kingston after crossing the Napanee River in late July, and the decisive American victory and resulting occupation of Kingston in September had completely cut the line of supply from Lower Canada to Upper Canada, and the entirety of the Great Lakes rested firmly in American hands. In the Michigan campaign, General Zachary Taylor had also reclaimed Detroit and as a result the Michigan territory, effectively trapping the remaining and steadily dwindling British forces due to the severance of the Saint Lawrence and thus their supply line that resulted from Kingston's capture. Pike and his Army then moved east with Taylor in order to support an American attempt at capturing Montreal under General Winfield Scott, who had been given overall command of the Canadian Front, and proved to be a competent and aggressive leader. With great difficulty, the campaign eventually succeeded, and Montreal laid in firm American control by October of 1813. By the onset of the winter of 1813, the only strategic key position left unconquered by the Americans in Canada was Quebec, and with both Ontario and Montreal in firm control, its resistance to eventual capture seemed unlikely. As the summer of 1814 emerged, Quebec too had fallen under Scott by June, and the American position on the continent appeared overwhelmingly strong. A final British last ditch offensive into Louisiana was also thwarted by General Andrew Jackson at New Orleans, and it was now clear that the Americans could no longer be removed of their gains. The standing armies of Britain, its Canadian militia and its Native American allies had been largely defeated, and it was clear to London by September of 1814 that the situation on the continent was a lost cause. As the American consolidation of the occupied Canadian territories took place throughout the winter of 1814, so too did the end of major hostilities, and by the end of the year both the United States and Great Britain had begun negotiations to formally end the war.

Treaty_Of_Ghent_Signing.jpg

By September of 1814, the situation in North America had dictated a clear American victory upon the capture of Quebec by Winfield Scott in June. The repulsion of a British offensive in Louisiana by Andrew Jackson had completely destroyed the desire for Britain to continue the war, and negotiations to formally end the war began to take place throughout the end of the year.

The Treaty of Ghent, signed on December 24th, 1814, had established a clear American victory. Throughout the course of the war, the defeat of Napoleon in France had largely ended the impressment of American sailors into the Royal Navy and restrictive trade as a result of active British intervention, but the utter defeat and capture of Canada through the United States' decisive military victories in Ontario and Quebec could not go ignored. Great Britain, both unable and unwilling to make further attempts to dislodge a now well-experienced and well-trained American military from its former North American colony, had lost a vast amount of settled territory through mandated cessions. By the end of negotiations in Ghent, it had ceded Manitoba, Ontario, Quebec, Newfoundland, Labrador, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia and Prince Edward's Island in their entirety to the United States. Its western provinces, however, remained largely in tact, although they were unsettled and unexplored, and were of little interest to the victorious Americans in comparison to their gigantic gains. The United States voluntarily had essentially withdrew their claims to the Canadian west in exchange for total sovereignty over Upper and Lower Canada. Regardless, Madison's war had paid off in huge unprecedented gains, and the United States now thoroughly enjoyed complete control over the Great Lakes, the Saint Lawrence River, and the Hudson Bay, and their ability to advance westward could now continue unimpeded and unmolested.

Treaty_Of_Ghent1814.png

The Treaty of Ghent, signed in 1814, established a clear American victory, and by its final draft Great Britain had ceded the entirety of its eastern Canadian colony to the United States, leaving only the western half intact. The Treaty also clearly defined borders between the new American possessions and the western territories in order to avoid future border disputes, which Britain was now in a clear disadvantage to most certainly lose. The United States, represented in blue, Great Britain, represented in red, and Spain represented in olive.

The Treaty would have lasting affects on the demographics of the North American continent, however, as it was amended in 1815 to provide a special provision for the now generally unruly Canadian populace, which the United States had trouble controlling. The United States and Great Britain offered subsidized overland relocation of all willing Canadian settlers westward to the newly founded province of British Columbia, which remained in British control as a result of the Treaty, and also established the 49th parallel north circle of latitude as the southern border between this province and the border of the United States, and also clearly defined the eastern and northeastern border of the western states in order to appease general unrest and to avoid future conflict over national border disputes, which Britain was now in a distinct disadvantage to most certainly lose. By 1819, the amended 1815 Treaty proved to be popular, as up to 80% of all English-speaking Canadians had voluntarily relocated to British Columbia, and had been properly subsidized and repaid for their relocation by 1821.

Canadian_Relocation.jpg

The amended 1815 Treaty provided subsidized overland relocation of all willing Canadian settlers westward to the newly founded province of British Columbia. By 1819, up to 80% of all English-speaking Canadians had voluntarily relocated to British Columbia.

Part II, Chapter II: The Great Migration
 
Last edited:
Wait a minute... Now we have the USA split between Anglo Saxon protestants and French Catholics
Hmm theirs a flaw in this country that could definatly come round to bite it in the arse latter on especially if it was to enter a civil war of some sorts...Wich GB will most Likly support

Edit: earlier Spanish American war?
 
Wait a minute... Now we have the USA split between Anglo Saxon protestants and French Catholics
Hmm theirs a flaw in this country that could definatly come round to bite it in the arse latter on especially if it was to enter a civil war of some sorts...Wich GB will most Likly support

Edit: earlier Spanish American war?

Not quite! Keep reading and you'll find out eventually. ;)
 
Hello, my friend! Saint Cloud here. Stationed in Fort Bragg though. And it's not a wank! Just an alternate history focused on a fictional republic in North America. ;)
I have a cousin who was in the army and was stationed at Ft. Bragg when he wasn't in Iraq. :)
 
I have a cousin who was in the army and was stationed at Ft. Bragg when he wasn't in Iraq. :)

It's the largest post in the U.S. military both in terms of active duty service members stationed and landmass, so if you do a long enough career in the Army you'll eventually end up here. Hard to leave though, the 82nd can be a bit of a black hole. I know a few guys who have done 9+ years here and have gone from E-1 to E-7 sometimes in the same company the entire time. I only have 68 days left, however. Looking forward to restarting my life!
 
Thank you, everyone, for the encouraging replies. I'm currently scrubbing Part II, Chapter II: The Great Migration right now to make sure it's to my standards before I post it. Regardless, it'll be coming shortly. Stay tuned.
 
Very interesting timeline.

I'm wondering how the lack of convenient transatlantic access to British North America will affect matters in the future. Once the transcontinental railway is built, will Britain negotiate extraterritorial rights? Probably not, considering the sheer length... but there'll definitely be interesting issues arising.

And I'm very much looking forward to Minnesotan independence!
 
Very interesting timeline.

I'm wondering how the lack of convenient transatlantic access to British North America will affect matters in the future.

BINGO. This becomes a pretty pivotal issue in the future. Unfortunately, however, no spoilers. ;) Imagine, if you will, the creation of a monster in order to kill the enemies of its master, but in turn becomes so vicious it kills its master as well. That's all you get!
 
Part II, Chapter II: The Great Migration


Following the capture of Quebec in 1814, General Winfield Scott, now the overall commander of U.S. forces, knew that political negotiations for ending the war were inevitable, if not already underway. Scott had long foreseen difficulties in occupying the Canadian provinces and its unruly populace, and his statement via letter to Congress in the summer of 1814 emphasized these difficulties. His solution to not request their cession from Great Britain, however, had gone ignored, as the economic possibilities of controlling the entire eastern seaboard of the continent was regarded as an extremely profitable benefit for the price of a rebellious populace. The immediate fallout due to the occupation of Canada by the United States in the Ontario and Quebec regions in 1814 and the announcement of the entirety of eastern Canada's annexation to the United States due to the nation's victory in the War of 1812 had lead to widespread dissent in the occupied territories throughout the winter of 1814. The initial and expected harsh military crackdown and curfews (although not as harsh as Andrew Jackson's proposed policy of scorched earth and mass murder, which had been discarded as unfeasible) implemented by the United States Army and its leaders saw slight success at first, but slowly proved to be ineffective throughout the months of November and December, as the Canadian territory was found to be much too vast and as a result far less concentrated in urban areas, which made enforcement of the curfews and policing actions difficult. Furthermore, the harsh Canadian winter and the above-average amount of annual snowfall also prevented mobility and freedom of maneuver, and thus hampered timely American response to Canadian resistance. To complicate matters further, American leadership and soldiers were also still relatively unfamiliar with the native terrain as opposed to the average Canadian resistor, and thus were at a distinct disadvantage on a tactical level. Thus, the untenable situation that resulted from the annexation of these territories had been made clear by the spring of 1815, and the realization of this fact by American government officials had provoked them to find a peaceful solution to the rabid Canadian resistance, which was only speculated to become worse. By February of 1815, the occupied territories of Upper and Lower Canada saw dozens of authority-challenging acts occur daily, and by the end of 1815 the widespread Canadian rebellions had tallied over 100 American fatalities in the regions and had left over 800 Canadians dead as a direct byproduct of violent dissent. The infamous York and Kingston Rebellions of 1815 in January contributed to roughly half of these numbers, and had likewise caused a significant amount of property damage.

Canadian_Rebellion.jpg

Canadian rebellions throughout late 1814 and early 1815 had prompted the United States government to explore solutions to quell the rabid dissent in their newly annexed territories.

The amended Treaty of Ghent in 1815 had thus provided a widely publicized answer to what would later be known as the "Canadian Problem." A combined British and American subsidy program to relocate English-speaking Canadians west to British Columbia (should they so choose) had been widely regarded as successful for both parties involved, as for the Americans it removed unruly Canadians from land now regarded as American and thus opened them to American settlement and business without a future threat of ethnic violence. It also eliminated the perceived nightmare of maintaining a large garrisoned military presence in Upper Canada for a undetermined amount of time (150 years, as Winfield Scott estimated when inquired by the American Congress) to quell this expected ethnic tension, as Canadian settlers who had long before established a sense of national identity (one which had only strengthened due to its early victories in the war and the death of Isaac Brock) were deemed unlikely to assimilate before the turn of the 19th century. The amended portion of the treaty likewise benefited Great Britain in that it would still have a strategic foothold in North America by virtue of keeping its loyal population base by relocating it to the intact western portion of its Canadian colonies, although the proposed province of British Columbia where these settlers would be subsidized to relocate to was only relatively new to European settlement, and was thus far less developed in comparison to their former territory of eastern Canada. Beyond the Canadians that would voluntarily relocate by virtue of preservation of their national identity, increases in nation-wide taxation by the Americans to pay for the accumulated war debt included a sharp taxation on the Canadian populace, and the refusal of American leaders to allow the Canadian provinces to be represented politically in Washington until ethnic violence ceased had also forced many remaining Canadians to "voluntarily" apply for the subsidy program, as remaining in their former homes proved to be fiscally impossible. By 1819, as many as 500,000 English-speaking Canadians eligible for the joint subsidy program had voluntarily relocated to the newly established province of British Columbia, removing over 80% of this demographic from the newly acquired American territory. The program was also praised for its effectiveness, as payments to relocated Canadians were timely and accurate, although credit to the program from Canadians who undertook its benefit was largely applied to Great Britain, who took a much more dedicated approach than the United States to make the program appealing and effective for obvious reasons.

Canadian_Relocation2.jpg

By 1819, as many as 500,000 English-speaking Canadians eligible for the joint subsidy program under the amended 1815 Treaty of Ghent had voluntarily relocated to the newly established province of British Columbia, removing over 80% of this demographic from the newly acquired American land called the "Ontario Territory."

Regardless, the United States' victory in the War of 1812 had fostered in an entirely new era of continental dominance and population shifts in North America. The nation's territorial acquisitions following the Treaty of Ghent and its signing in 1814 had expanded the political boundaries of the nation dramatically, and it now roamed unchecked throughout the remainder of the 1810's and 1820's with a sizable and experienced military force under competent and proven leadership. Its economy, unmolested due to the elimination of the British on the Saint Lawrence and the Great Lakes, saw a dramatic increase in prosperity, and its population also saw a spike in immigration as the Napoleonic Wars in Europe came to a close. Politically, the unified American legislature and the widely regarded successful presidency of James Monroe during his two terms as President from 1817 to 1825 saw a total elimination of bipartisan disagreement in the United States, and this era later became known as the "Era of Good Feelings," which ushered in a new age of domestic improvement for the country as a whole, especially as Canadian unrest in the newly founded "Ontario Territory" had subsided as a result of the amended 1815 Treaty of Ghent.

James_Monroe.jpg

The Era of Good Feelings saw a dramatic increase in economic prosperity for the United States, in great credit to President James Monroe and the unified American legislature, which saw the elimination of bipartisan disagreement in the United States during his two terms as President from 1817 to 1825.

The Upper Midwest, with the exception of the lower peninsula of the Michigan territory, had gone entirely unmolested throughout the War of 1812. As most fighting had occurred along the Saint Lawrence and the Great Lakes in Ontario, the territories saw no combat throughout the 2 years of hostility as a result. Although the mobilization of the United States military and its various militia units throughout the frontier had slightly affected the demographics of these territories (mostly of Michigan,) these were regarded as minor, and military victories throughout 1813 and 1814 allowed many Michigan settlers who had volunteered for military service following the declaration of war to return home following the end of their contracts (rather than be kept indefinitely until the war's end.) Furthermore, the Minnesota and Wisconsin areas had contributed relatively few personnel to the war effort, as enforcing conscription and contracted regulars to fight outside of their home territories was near impossible due to a lack of accessibility and transportation to the Upper Mississippi River valley, and so the United States relied primarily on volunteers from these regions instead (as they were also proven to be much more effective in combat than conscripts.) The few amount of permanent American settlers that would have been eligible for military service during the war (as French settlers were not, due to obvious cultural differences and language barriers) were regarded as nominal, and most likely would not have been able to make a difference in the war effort regardless, even if they had been forced into the United States Army and taken part in the Canadian theater. Thus, the War of 1812 saw little change to the growing population base of the Upper Midwest. Out of the estimated 100 permanent able-bodied American settlers in the combined Minnesota-Wisconsin territory, only 10 had volunteered for military service, and none of these service members had ever left American territory throughout the duration of the war, and were regulated primarily to militia duty. In any case, by 1814, they had all returned upon the ending of their contracts, and thus the War of 1812 had passed without any directly negative effects.

War_Of1812_Unit.gif

Due to the majority of the fighting during the War of 1812 occurring along the Saint Lawrence and Lake Ontario, the Upper Midwest saw no combat throughout the 2 years of hostility, and by 1814 the war had passed without any directly negative effects.

The acquisition of the Ontario Territory and resulting American monopolization of the Saint Lawrence and the Great Lakes in combination with a booming American economy, however, lead to direct positive effects for the Upper Midwest. The establishment of further opportunities for revenue beyond just the fur trade, which had exclusively dominated the economy of the regions for the last 300 years, lead to unparalleled growth and settlement, and the removal of British influence due to annexation had eliminated any threat to the area that had once existed, which had primarily come from the North West and the Hudson's Bay Companies, albeit by the time of their removal from central Canada due to the Treaty of Ghent the two feuding and highly competitive British trading companies had yet to expand their hostility beyond the southern half of Manitoba, and were thus regarded as trivial to the average colonist in the Upper Midwest. Both companies would eventually be completely gutted and disbanded by 1835, as the British no longer controlled the Hudson Bay. The relocation of hundreds of thousands of Anglo-Canadians to British Columbia had also seen minor settlement from this population in the Minnesota area, as upwards of 50 English-speaking Canadians migrated to the territory following the massive displacement and migration of their demographic westward from the Niagara region following the immediate end of the war in 1814 prior to the introduction of the subsidy program. Almost all of these Canadians were Catholic and regarded as American supporters, and their arrival in the territory foreshadowed their migration in much larger numbers, as the Upper Canada domestic economy fell into shambles due to the severe drop in population by 1819. They too had remorsefully relocated in search of further enterprise, and the large Catholic majority in Minnesota and its lack of governmental presence had made the region very appealing to weary Catholic Anglo-Canadian refugees, and their early travel would thus pave the way for future Canadian settlement. Persecution throughout the Ontario territory also continued throughout the 1810's, as American soldiers rarely differentiated between Canadian resistors and American sympathizers as resistance grew more violent, and as such lead many Canadians who were loyal to the American government to leave Canada regardless of their chosen side, mostly in fear of mistreatment. Remaining French-speaking Canadians, who were not qualified to be granted subsidies under the Treaty of Ghent, were far less hostile to their new American government, and thus faced markedly less persecution, but nonetheless a small quantity still relocated as the economy of Canada began to dwindle in hopes of finding fortunes elsewhere. Very few had chosen to migrate westward to British Columbia, as their persecution at the hands of their Anglo-Canadian cousins in the province was reported as widespread due to their usual sympathizing attitudes towards the United States (which was emphasized and exaggerated in great detail by the western Canadian press.) They instead settled in areas now open to their migration where other French-speaking peoples resided in large numbers, and where Catholicism was prevalent. Louisiana, along with Minnesota and Wisconsin, all saw a large amount of settlement from displaced French-Canadians throughout the early years of the 1820's.

French_Canadians.jpg

French-speaking Canadians, although not suffering a displacement as large as their Anglo-Canadian cousins, also saw a small amount of their populace relocate to live in other areas after the collapse of the Canadian economy, including Minnesota and Wisconsin.

The opening of the entirety of the Great Lakes, the Hudson Bay and the Saint Lawrence to American enterprise without fear of British intervention also promoted trade between the Minnesota frontier and the newly admitted states of Illinois and Ohio, who now had a direct (although extensively long) water route to the Fort du Luht settlement in Minnesota and the village of Sault Sainte Marie in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan, and as a result access to the two colony's respectively lucrative fur trades. This trade route would later be referred to as the "Duluth Route" on American maps, thus gradually changing the French origin of the name to a more Americanized version over the course of the early 19th century. As the the 1810's drew to a close, the economic prosperity of the Upper Midwest and the growth of its population base due to migration had reached a never before seen climax. By 1820, the du Luht settlement, which had been renamed Duluth, and Fort Beauharnois, renamed as Lake Pepin, had climbed to nearly 2,000 permanent settlers each, doubling their respective populations in only a few short years. Half of these respective numbers were either Anglo-Canadian Catholics or American Catholics. This was due in large part to further migration of American sympathizing Anglo-Canadian Catholics to the territory in 1818 and 1819, since after the implementation of the 1815 Treaty of Ghent, the future of Upper Canada had remained remarkably dim for the remaining 20% of Canadians who had not chosen to voluntarily relocate to British Columbia through subsidy, and this select demographic of American "Loyalists" as a result faced persecution from both the Canadian resistors who remained and the garrisoned forces of the United States Army, who still disregarded any conscious effort to differentiate between the two factions. Furthermore, American Catholics, emboldened by the popularity of the faith in the region and the growing economic opportunities, had also migrated to the territory in novelty sized amounts, especially as transportation and accessibility to its settlements improved due to the monopolization of the Great Lakes trade routes and the quelling of Native American resistance in Ohio and Illinois. The rapidly expanding economy of the region in combination with the growing city of Detroit, Michigan (which provided a stepping stone for settlement into the territories) further helped the "Era of Good Feelings" to extend into the area throughout the late years of the 1810's and the early years of the 1820's. By 1822, Minnesota, Wisconsin and the Upper Peninsula of Michigan (which were all incorporated under the new "Michigan Territory") had a combined total of 13,000 permanent settlers, nearly 8,000 of which were Anglo (Yankee/Canadian) Catholics, 3,000 of which were remaining original French Catholics and 1,000 of which were miscellaneous European-based Protestants. The Great Migration, as it was later called, saw up to over 700,000 souls regardless of national origin in the North American continent settle in new territories either through displacement, subsidy or voluntary relocation from 1815 - 1822, and was so closely intertwined with the after effects of the War of 1812 that it was usually regarded as synonymous with the Era of Good Feelings.

Great_Lakes_Trade.jpg

The opening of the entirety of the Great Lakes to American enterprise without fear of British intervention and a still lucrative fur trade in the Minnesota frontier allowed the establishment of a ship based trade route between the newly admitted states of Illinois and Ohio and the Upper Midwest. As a result, by 1822, Minnesota, Wisconsin and the Upper Peninsula of Michigan had a combined total of 13,000 permanent settlers.

The large population boom of the 1810's and 1820's in the Upper Midwest had also lead to a change in relations with the Native Americans residing in the regions. The Ojibwa, who had long resided in the areas and numbered roughly 60,000, were slowly losing their only advantage, their numbers, which had long enabled them to maintain peaceful relations in the fur trade, as the white settlers in the regions historically had never been able to afford relations to turn hostile, as the Natives were the providers of their only source of income and greatly outnumbered them, thus forming a unique symbiotic relationship. However, as the fur trade slowly began to decline and routes of accessibility opened to both Minnesota and Wisconsin in the early 1820's, the sharp increase in white settlement had forced the Natives to seek relocation further west, as many Native leaders saw that both their lands and independence were in jeopardy. The inability to negotiate with white settlers due to still prevalent language barriers, obvious cultural differences, widespread racism and the establishment of trading posts along the Nebraska and Iowa frontier by the United States Army in 1825 had also limited their former territorial possessions, and as a result their numbers slowly dwindled in the Upper Mississippi River Valley throughout the early half of the 19th century, as many Ojibwa and their unlikely Sioux allies began to instead seek settlement in the still unincorporated Dakota territory, which was still under control of the United States, but completely free of white settlement. By 1823, only 30,000 Ojibwa and Sioux remained in the territories they formerly owned.

Ojibwa_Natives.jpg

Rapid white expansion in the Upper Midwest and the decline of the fur trade forced many Ojibwa and Sioux natives, who still maintained peaceful relations with European migrants, to instead seek settlement further west in the still unincorporated Dakota territory, which was completely free of white settlement. By 1823, only 30,000 Ojibwa and Sioux remained in the territories they formerly owned, halving their numbers in the region in little less than 5 years.

Part II, Chapter III: Pike's Return
 
Last edited:
Top