careful lest you wake the bear.Dang.
Makes me feel better about the recent election though.
I'm sorry, is that leaning too much towards chat territory? I only meant that the real life one is a lot calmercareful lest you wake the bear.
I would refrain from referring to events within the last decade, which usually go in Chat.I'm sorry, is that leaning too much towards chat territory? I only meant that the real life one is a lot calmer
Ah, sorry, my bad.I would refrain from referring to events within the last decade, which usually go in Chat.
It makes sense that Frick would become POTUS since it's mentioned that the Sherman Anti-Trust Act is officially repealed in 1906, and only one potential President - Frick - would allow and even actively support that.Back to the topic at hand; whoever claimed that Frick would win, go full authoritarian, and lead to a civil war that either starts or finishes in 1918/19 probably had the best prediction.
Though the Sherman Anti-Trust act would not be finally repealed until 1906, it was a dead letter long before then. Perversely, when it was enforced during its sixteen years of life, it was generally implemented against labor unions, which were attacked as ‘combinations’ conspiring to restrict the ‘free competition’ that had long since ceased to exist.
In 1910 the LDP was finally granted a semi-governmental status as the Economic Regulatory Office, with special access to congress and the executive. It was merely the recognition of a long-standing reality; business and state power had abandoned any real pretense of separation many years ago.
I'm actually really torn on this. In the end, I think I agree with Knox. It was an unfortunately necessary evil. I mean, when someone openly calls for insurrection with the support of an entire party (not saying every socialist approved of Deleon's call, but when you have a large, angry mob outside Congress, it sure seems like they have support to the people stuck inside) you cannot allow that to continue. Knox will likely be remembered very poorly by history, but I think he probably made the best decision he could have. To leave things as they were would have assured a Frick or Darrow victory and civil war. Knox rolled the dice and prayed Roosevelt would win. Unfortunately for him, he lost that bet.
Addendum: Knox also isn't wrong about Frick buying the presidency. Knox relied a bit too much on the honesty of others (ironically enough). You can blame him for maybe giving Frick the opportunity to buy the election, but you can't blame him for Frick's actions.