And now we return with another update and don't think I'm letting this be just a Beatles wank TL - even though so far they are in better place than OTL for sure - as we now enter 1972 in which will be a year in which quite a lot of drama takes place in which we shall soon see why. Note, there might be some words in this that might cause offense though I think you might know what it might be if you see it. So without saying anymore, let's start!
Scaling Everest
Extract from 'Epstein: The Secondary Years 1968 - 1978' by Debbie Geller
1971 would seem by many by both the musical press and public of the year that The Beatles had solved many of those inner problems regarding Apple, who got what on an album and other issues that hung over the band and with a successful comeback tour in Europe and an hugely successful
Concert For Bangladesh album and show, it was hard to see where any problems might lie. 1972 would also be the tenth anniversary of the band's first single in
Love Me Do and it would be funny looking back on that song and seeing how far the song writing for the band had changed within that time so this did seem like a time for celebration but alas as the old saying goes, things seemed a little too good to be true. This was the final year before Brian Epstein's managerial contract would run out in October that year and while he would admit that ten years as the band's manager did seem like a amount of time that looked as though he had outstayed his welcome and that change was needed.
Allen Klein did looked to be the man to take The Beatles into a new direction while Epstein would have hoped in the first place that Klein would prove himself to be good and that Epstein could simply focus on running
Apple Corps and the other musical acts in the company's new increasing line-up. However, over the past few years, Klein had started to prove himself to be not the man that the likes of Lennon, Harrison and Starr had suspected with McCartney and Epstein always having their suspicious about him (Billy Preston being somewhat late to join the band didn't really have an opinion on the man though in truth did seem to prefer Epstein) in which the handling of the funds following the Bangladesh efforts proved to be a breaking point. One American magazine in early 1972 even reported that some of the proceeds remained unaccounted for and had found their way into Klein's accounts which greatly angered Klein who promptly tried to sue the magazine for $150 million in damages.
Despite this threat, the suit was later withdrawn though the accusations attracted unwelcome scrutiny at a time when questions were also being asked about Klein's mismanagement of the Beatles' finances and even debated as to why Epstein wasn't trying to help out Klein although he would answer these questions that he was letting Klein take more control of how to handle things himself if he was still in the running to become the band's new manager though some suspected that Epstein was secretly setting Klein up for a fall which would lead him leaving in disgrace and in truth he had done this to himself and was looking more likely that he would not be getting that role of the band's newest manager. That being said, Epstein wasn't so sure as he was certain someone would be wanting to get control of the band and this was a thought that ate at him for a lot of the time though even it all that wasn't a problem, 1972 was to be difficult year all around in which would all start in January that year.
---------
Extract from 'Harmony And Strife: The Early Years Of Apple 1968 - 1972' by Jordon Monroe
On January 30th, in the Bogside area of Derry, Northern Ireland, British soldiers shot twenty-six unarmed civilians during a peaceful protest march in which Thirteen people died that day while others were injured by rubber bullets of batons with even two being run down by army vehicles. The event in question would be known as 'Bloody Sunday' in which would be perhaps one of the darkest moments in Anglo-Irish history and caused an uproar on both sides of the Irish sea and such an event did not go unnoticed by both John Lennon and Paul McCartney as with both men carrying Irish heritage in their families both felt compelled to do something to express their anger over what had happened and both would get to writing up songs though curiously enough, both had not told the other that they would be writing a song regarding the events of Bloody Sunday.
It would not be clear if they had been even aware of one or the other writing a song about what had happened but it was no surprise to many by this point that Lennon would want to make a protest song about Bloody Sunday in which he would write two being
The Luck of The Irish and
Sunday Bloody Sunday though he along with many were stunned to see McCartney of all people to write a protest song in which Lennon was taken aback the most in which he had more often than not accused his bandmate for writing 'Granny Music'. McCartney would talk of the situation saying that, "protests songs were always John's area yet after watching what was happening on TV news and really for the first time asking what were we doing in Ireland I felt the need to write something down such was the gravity of the situation [1]".
It would Phil Spector who would be the first person to know about both men writing songs about the Irish Troubles when by a staggering coincidence both men sent their songs to him on the same day and would write back to both not knowing who should record which song. A rather annoyed Lennon would then ring up his bandmate from New York about what McCartney was doing. Lennon would say that, "I rang him up what was he up to as this was so unlike him I though that Phil [Spector] was trying to make a joke and had to ask Paul if what he was doing was true and I couldn't believe it when Paul said it was the truth. I paused on my end for I don't know how long until I then proposed of why don't we release a single from it and that is how it would all start."
Paul and Linda McCartney would fly out to New York to meet up with the Lennons to record the single in which not only would be just be the second time it would be just the two men playing all the instruments on the song as what had been done a few years ago with
The Ballad of John And Yoko/Two Of Us single [2] but this would also be the first time that any Beatles song would be recorded and mixed on American soil for the first time (even though there is an argument that
The Concert For Bangladesh or
The Beatles Live At The Hollywood Bowl live albums are the first) and from the two songs Lennon had written, it was then decided that The Luck Of The Irish would be chosen as Lennon's contribution but also the A-side of the single. Neither George Harrison or Ringo Starr would play in any part with the former at that time was busy trying to work out the funds for Bangladesh while the latter was rather reluctant to take part though both would give their blessing for the single to go ahead.
Epstein wasn't so comfortable with a single that he felt was too political for The Beatles and could alienate much of their fanbase yet by this point, Lennon's own political views were well documented by all and that trying to keep Lennon silent now was frankly useless and he would very reluctantly for Lennon and McCartney to go ahead with the single though he and Sir Joseph Lockwood, the chairman of EMI, both warned the pair that EMI and Apple wouldn't be able to release the single due to it's inflammable nature yet both the two songwriters insisted it must go out with Lockwood telling that that "It will be banned, you know" and he would be proven right [3]. The Luck Of The Irish/Give Ireland Back To The Irish single would be released in February would be banned by the BBC though it must be said this wasn't the first time this had happened with The Beatles as songs like
Lucy In The Sky With Diamonds, A Day In The Life and
The Ballad of John And Yoko had all seen the same fate though this felt very different due to its subject matter which proved to be the most controversial Beatles single released at that point and in some ways ruined the universal appeal of the band in the eyes of many.
The single would reach number one in the charts in Ireland and rather curiously in Spain yet wouldn't see a American release as record executives felt that America had enough troubles at home regarding Vietnam and that the Irish Troubles would be far too difficult to understand for most Americans. The
Irish Double as the single would be nicknamed by many afterwards would cause not only some anger on one side of the political debate with many saying that The Beatles should stay out of anything political yet perhaps what was surprising was that even leftists who Lennon had wanted to be part of seemed to look poorly on it in which still looking at him as a sell out following his comments about Bangladesh, many felt that this was Lennon's desperate attempt to try and win back their favour yet this seemed to have backfired in which some felt that by making a record based on the death of innocent people in Northern Ireland just to feel popular again by using The Beatles as a pawn angered many and only succeeded in making Lennon feel more isolated from the left more than ever [4] and McCartney would later state that Lennon was left numb from this treatment in which he felt they totally misread the situation and Lennon would feel more determined to not only try and make his feelings known into making more music.
---------
Extracts from 'Peaked: The Beatles In The 1970's' by Alyson Henderson
The
Irish Double had left The Beatles - mostly John Lennon and Paul McCartney to be exact - in a rather unfavourable light in the eyes of many not since the infamous 'Bigger Than Jesus' debacle though thankfully there was a lack of death threats this time round. Nonetheless, both songs on the single were looked down on for trying too hard to try and appeal to the growing counter-culture movement among reviewers with one modern reviewer stating that 'the record managed to irritate everyone, not least for its naïve, simplistic attitude to a complex situation … but also for its musical mediocrity. The BBC banned the record, granting it a notoriety disproportionate to its importance.' Something had to be done to try and distract the public of the band going in strange new direction in which would be one of the few times that Allen Klein and Brian Epstein would agree on something to try and re-package the band as the lovable Moptops one last time as everyone not only remember but perhaps longed to return.
The idea would be a Greatest Hits album which by then had become common for many musical acts yet strangely The Beatles hadn't really gone into this area despite having more hit singles over the years than many other musical acts could have in a whole career so there was surely a market for it. It would be Klein who seemed to get the ball rolling in which he would pitch to Epstein that not only should they go down this path of releasing a Greatest Hits album but in fact two of them and that both would be a double album. Epstein would for once agree with Klein in what was said to be one of the rare times in which the two men didn't get into an argument over something though there was perhaps another reason to all this from the perspective of Klein and that was there had been many bootleg versions of Beatles hits which were all illegally taking profits from an untapped goldmine that if anyone should've been taking profits then it should be Apple. Some though suggest that this was to try and distract people away from the questions being asked about the band's finances that he following him around though Klein would try and not bring that topic up.
Epstein could see it would be a hit as even tough a double album might be expensive it hadn't stopped fans from buying The White Album and The Concert For Bangladesh which all had recorded great sales and there was no reason why two Greatest Hits albums couldn't do the same and with the added fact that 1972 was the tenth anniversary of
Love Me Do, the band's first single, it seemed like an suitable time to act now. So a plan was put into motion to have the two compilations to come out in March and they were both to be called
The Beatles/Red (1963 - 1966) and
The Beatles/Blue (1967 - 1969) or perhaps better known to many as the
Red and
Blue albums respectably [5]. While on the Red album that no one would've been able to tell the difference between a song done by ether Lennon or McCartney (in which all of the songs on the album were by), there was indeed a difference with how each song on the Blue album in which one could tell a difference of a song written by a certain Beatle.
The two albums would prove popular enough and hearing the old songs again did bring some nostalgia for the older Beatles fans who probably missed those early days when the band were just a band not some force of nature that probably meant more than just a mere musical act yet others began to wonder if there would be a third compilation album from 1970 onwards in which the word was simply 'never say never' but in truth it wasn't know how long the band might go on for but what was more exciting following the release of the two albums was that another Beatles album, the fifteenth album to be released in July and with Lennon now living in New York, it was him who would make the suggesting of, following the recording of the Irish Double at the A&R Recording Studios [6], felt that the band should try a different location away from the typical recording locations at either Abbey Road or Savile Road and use that as a base of operation.
McCartney seemed keen on the idea, Ringo Starr was willing to try out the idea and even George Harrison was interested in somewhere different to see how things might turn out while Billy Preston was happy to be a bit more closer to home. It was only when the theme of the album was about to take shape that things would start to go somewhat off the rails. By now, Phil Spector's work on the last two Beatles albums had been exceptional with the expectation he'd make it three in a row here; even McCartney who had at first been angry at how he had try to add a choir for
The Long And Winding Road had grown to like Spector's work though there was a sense that something was missing that their former producer George Martin wasn't there to help out though he was busy with other Apple artists at this time. That said though, the story of The Beatles' fifteenth album was to be a troubling one from the start.
---------
Extract from 'The Beatles On The Brink' by Ken McNab
When it came time to start recording the album in March, many, including most of the band and Phil Spector, had expected an album that would follow up with the production and sound as seen with
All Things Must Pass and
Imagine though they would accept there would be some tweaks needed to make it stand out compared to the others. The new album would certainly sound different for sure though perhaps not for the best reasons. Lennon had wanted an album that would be a more rawer and stripped back sound for the album that would sound different from the other productions from the other albums before; incidentally though the idea of stripped back Beatles sounding album had been McCartney's idea during the infamous
The Beatles At Work sessions in 1969 though this was never brought up oddly enough.
Lennon had grown annoyed of the rather 'dreamy' sound of
Imagine in which he had grown to dislike a lot and now he wanted a more rougher take that would be a far cry from Spector's notable 'Wall of Sound' system. It was clear from the get-go that the album was being championed by Lennon more with the direction he wanted the album to go in and that was more of a political direction that made the others rather worried knowing the situation regarding the Irish Double. Harrison would describe Lennon during that time as a man possessed searching for something and would often clash with Spector wanting him to reduce the production on the album and there would be times in which his bandmates would sadly had to wait for an argument to blow over, not helped by Yoko often butting in to give her opinion on the matter.
In the end, Brian Epstein would grow fed up with most of the bickering in which he would step in tell them to get on with it though he was to left shocked at some of the songs Lennon had presented for the new album as most of them had strong political undertones such as
Attica State which was based on the Attica prison riots the previous year and had been first written on Lennon's birthday that year, another song was
John Sinclair which was based on the American poet who was arrested for the possession of marijuana in 1969 and finally there was one called
New York City which was not only about the said city itself but about Lennon's recent immigration issues of his fear of deportation yet that was a song that the band seemed to like the most.
However, it was another political song that Lennon wrote that nearly caused Epstein to shoot down Lennon from the moment he heard the title song and that was the controversially titled
Woman Is The Nigger Of The World. A title that had been thought of by Yoko back in 1969 and a song that no matter how good it sounded would never get any radio time due to the 'N' word in the title and after the situation regarding the Irish Double, something like that song on a Beatles record was the last thing Epstein would have wanted and even the rest of the band were uncomfortable of playing it with McCartney trying to be diplomatic in saying that if they changed the title then it might be still be there for use yet the Lennons flat out refused claiming that if they did then the whole meaning of the song's title would be lost.
Must to Lennon's dismay, the song and much of his others he had brought out had been voted down by the band but Epstein admitted that there was nothing stopping him from recording his own album with those songs on it in which Lennon would accept as a consolation vote though his more political leanings on his songs in compared to previous years had not gone unnoticed by his bandmates in which Starr would privately admit that he felt Lennon was still reeling from being 'banished' from the left and was trying desperately to win back their favour though it would be something Lennon would not admit to anyone else though the others did seem to feel that was the case. In the end, other than having
New York City getting the nod, Lennon would have to go back into his archives and would dig up two other songs to make his contribution of three songs for the album which one would the Bob Dylan inspired folk song
Working Class Hero which had been written up two years ago as another of his political songs which didn't have the same baggage as some of the other songs and seemed 'safe' compared to the others.
It had been a song that would now get its moment to shine while in contrast his other song that would be included which would contrast with Lennon's two raw sounds which would be
Oh My Love, probably one of Lennon's most tender love songs ever written and a welcomed additional to the album. Then it was McCartney's turn to turn in his songs for the album in which the fist would be indie sounding
Smile Away, the other being the utter mind screw of a song called
Monkberry Moon Delight and finally topped up with the rather interesting ukulele inspired
Ram On which was Harrison would get to have some fun playing on the ukulele in which it has been well documented that Harrison had always loved that quirky instrument. Ringo Starr would also bring in his contribution for the album which would be
Back Off Boogaloo which many of his bandmates all stated was actually perhaps his best efforts signwriting wise and was pretty much to stick-on for the album.
Finally, Harrison would bring out his three chosen songs which would be
You, a soul inspired number he had written up the previous year, the other song would be
Apple Scruffs which was a name given to die-hard Beatles fans who would wait outside a studio whenever the band recording an album and would see for the first time in a few years have Lennon play on the harmonica once again which seemed like a fitting choice given how early Beatles songs like
Love Me Do and
Please Please Me all featured the use of Lennon playing that instrument was something of a throw back to the old days which the anniversary of that first single seemed a happy coincidence. Finally the other song for the album would be the so called big finale track which would be
Living In The Material World, a song which would play into more of Harrison's and even Preston's more spiritual beliefs which would find itself in contrast with Lennon's more harsher political songs which all was to cause the album's biggest problem and that was about tone.
---------
Extracts from 'Peaked: The Beatles In The 1970's' by Alyson Henderson
The new album itself would be called
Everest which had been the title for
Abbey Road in the first place [7] but instead the title was brought back for the newest album though it is unclear as to why this was the case as the story has many variations depending on which Beatle or anyone in their close circle who you ask. Epstein had always suggested that the title was to reference of how far the band had come in the decade since their first single and that this was the peak like scaling Mount Everest itself; McCartney and Preston insists that the album was to have an explorer theme yet overtime as recording took place, this all lost its way; Harrison would make a sly comment that the title was possibly an unexpected reference in his own mind of how he had made managed to scale the heights of Lennon and McCartney and reached a peak as a songwriter and both Lennon and Starr would insist there was no meaning and that he says the title itself sound striking so they just dusted that name off again and decided to reuse it.
Whatever the reason, the true story for the album's title may never be known but what was known was how much of a slog it was regarding its direction. In some ways, it was a repeat of the
White Album in which Phil Spector would have his work cut and likely would have felt that he was in the same as George Martin who would famously remark that he would be in different recording studios to accommodate each Beatle for it to appeal to that certain sound they each wanted and as it would turn out for Everest, history had repeated itself. The one difference here is that Spector would fail to make the album have a coherent tone in all the songs would class with each other from the biting rawness of
Working Class Hero being followed by the jolly sounding
Apple Scruffs or even something like the tender
Oh My Love being followed by the madness of
Monkberry Moon Delight; it wouldn't take a genius to realise that some of these songs, while all good in their own right, shouldn't be placed together.
What made things more difficult was Lennon's drive for this album in which he would position himself as the band's leader instead of McCartney who he had felt had been positioning himself for the role over the last few years which while it was a welcomed change at first, Lennon though wouldn't have quite the tact that admittedly McCartney had and most of his bickering was with Spector in which the later was wanting to add his famous 'Wall Of Sound' yet Lennon wanted a more stripped down sound as seen in his songs yet the rest of the band wanting a more fleshed out sound as with the previous two albums and in the end, Spector would be forced into make a compromise for the sound yet this was to make the production being either too raw or too produced.
These problems with the album even went as far as the design of even the album cover as to what it was to look like. Originally, the idea was have a photo of the band dressed as artic explorers planting a flag on top of the peak of Mount Everest which would have made sense with the album's title and play up the band's zany sense of humour yet this idea didn't get far. Another idea would be from Harrison and that would be a parody of the famous art piece of
The Last Supper with the band all sitting at a banquet table which would at first happen in which Hollywood photographer Ken Marcus would take it with the picture having hidden messages within the photo such as a nurse with a pram, set back from and to the left of the dining table, which seemed to be a hidden reference by Harrison referring to Boyd's inability to conceive a child; and the empty, distant wheelchair in memory of Harrison's late mother [8].
In the end though, even this cover wasn't chosen though it would end up on the rear cover, and instead what would follow in its place would be something rather basic in which would be Lennon's own idea of having a more stripped back feel in which the final album cover would be a black background with five circle portraits of the band with Preston's being placed in the middle [9] which was Lennon's suggesting of appealing of the leftists buyers of the sight of a black man taking centre stage on a Beatles album might appeal to them and win him their goodwill again. That said, Preston felt rather unsure about the idea and wasn't comfortable to be used as statement though Starr would assure him that having him in the middle meant that there would be no ego stroking from the rest of the band of who would get to be centre stage and Preston would feel a little better after that. With that all said on July 3rd 1972 in the United States and July 7th in the United Kingdom and the rest of the world,
Everest would be released to the public.
Everest (1972)
Side 1
1) New York City
2) You
3) Back Off Boogaloo
4) Oh My Love
5) Monkberry Moon Delight
Side 2
6) Working Class Hero
7) Apple Scruffs
8) Ram On
9) Smile Away
10) Living In The Material World
---------
Extract from 'Harmony And Strife: The Early Years Of Apple 1968 - 1972' by Jordon Monroe
When a Beatles album was released, it was always a sure-fire winner to top the albums sells charts regardless of the quality and with this year being an anniversary year with the Red and Blue albums already selling well which acted as a preshow for many would think would be a big anniversary celebration to mark, surely
Everest would deliver? What happened next was something that no one had expected to see from a Beatles album...an album that was getting mixed to negative reviews from the critics and even fans. The reaction was something to caught everyone off guard as the idea of a 'bad' Beatles album seemed unthinkable and while there had been albums before that had gained mixed reviews, they were nothing like this in which some critics and several anti-Beatles folks went as far as gleefully state that the Beatles bubble had finally burst and it being in the big anniversary year just seemed to make some take great delight in the situation.
As it would turn out,
Everest - while not a flop as it would sell fairly well enough though far lower compared to the previous Beatles albums - would be mark as the band's first misfire as it would fell to reach number one in the charts only reaching as high as number five before dropping after that. The questions of what went wrong with the album are widely documented depending on who you ask though some say the album was doomed from the start in which the
Irish Double single left both critics and Beatles fans alike rather alienate of a more political stance even if Harrison, Starr or Preston had nothing to do with it which meant that some were going into the album with a negative viewpoint from the start rather than an open one. Some claim that it wasn't helped that with it being an anniversary year some were expecting another Sergeant Pepper in which after how well the likes of
All Things Must Pass and
Imagine had been with their production there was no reason to doubt the same could happen here.
Instead what listeners got was a rather disjointed album that clearly didn't know which way it was going either with Spector's 'Wall Of Sound' or more of a raw stripped back level with the collection of songs, while good in their own right, probably shouldn't have been put together which left a rather baffling setlist in which the similarities to the White Album were there but worse. But no one got it worse than that of Lennon and McCartney in which many critics bemoaned their selection of songs for the album claiming that there was nothing ground-breaking with them though some did admit that
Oh My Love was actually worth it but that was about that; not to mention that with the
Irish Double still leaving a bad taste in the mouth for some, it was fair that some had an axe to grind with Lennon sadly getting the blame in which he admitted prior to the album's release that he was having more control of it and accidently made himself the fall guy for the album once it was released and the press wanted someone to blame.
Despite all this bad press the album did get, it wasn't all bad news. In contrast to Lennon and McCartney's offerings, Harrison and even Starr's work for the album was met with great praise in which
You seemed like a good classic pop song while Starr's
Back Off Boogaloo turned out to be the unlikely hit for the album that would chart higher than anything McCartney or Lennon did that year which went to show how much those two had underperformed for the album. Many who gave the album any sort of positive points would all claim that Harrison and Starr's work for the album saved the album to give it some weight when if not for them then the album would have been an unmitigated disaster. This would be parodied in an New York based newspaper with a caricature drawing of Harrison and Starr carrying the weight of a giant garbage bag on their backs while trying to climb up the slopes of Mount Everest with Preston trying to push from the back in which the garbage bag had a label on it saying 'Everest or rather Paul and John's Garbage' with to top it all off had a squabbling Lennon and McCartney on top of the bag arguing about something.
As crude as the drawing was, it was sadly a somewhat correct description of how many saw the album in which Harrison and Starr carried this album on their backs. In years later with many a retrospect looking at the album from a more open minded view would all admit that while the album is considered something of a black sheep in the Beatles canon, it is nowhere near the disaster that some make it out to be in which on its own the album is good though that it is dealt a bad hand in which the
Irish Double had muddied the waters that would've made things worse but even if that hadn't happened, it was coming after two very good albums in which many expected this to sound similar yet Everest would be a very different beast to the other Beatles albums at that point and many were taken aback of how different it sounded and were likely not happy with it with some calling it the 'Anti-Imagine' album due to how Lennon had stated he had wanted to move away from the more dreamy sound of the other albums.
In the end,
Everest would underperform to put it nicely and any suggestions of having a tour to coincide with the album were quietly swept under the rug and The Beatles were left in an strange position in which they didn't know where to go from here and Epstein would find himself being asked questions if the album's failure was a sign that the band was on the verge of collapse in which Epstein would deny yet deep down he'd have to wonder what on earth were they to do now? To make matters worse, it would seem that even Klein when upon listening to it at first seemed aware that the album was not going to go down well and would actually try and cut back on the marketing as a why to cut any losses the album might make but instead contribute to the low costs which for the band would be final straw for Klein's hope of becoming manager.
Yet no one took the album's outcome badly more than Lennon in which not only had he made himself as the brainchild behind the feel of the album's tone but was single out as the one reasonable for the album's reception. What was worse him was that support he hoped to win back the leftist crowd he was aiming for didn't materialise and ultimately his efforts had been all for nothing and in some ways had ruined the band's spotless record with success though some would argue this was going to end sooner or later no matter what. Lennon though wasn't going to give up so easily though in he and Yoko would, by taken Epstein's advice of making a solo album of the songs that Epstein felt had no place on a Beatles album and that Lennon would be free to make they wanted. They would bring back Spector in which despite the two having clashed during the recording of
Everest would strangely get back together to record this new album in which was hoped for a October release. Surely it couldn't get worse, right?
[1] In which Paul said IOTL.
[2] If you look back on earlier for this TL.
[3] As what was said and happened much like OTL.
[4] Yeah, Lennon's political activism ITTL goes from bad to worse here following Bangladesh here.
[5] Yes, we have the Red and Blue albums from OTL here, only changes are is they are released a year earlier from OTL and that Blue doesn't go up to 1970 here.
[6] Funnily enough, was where OTL Ram album was recorded so here it makes an appearance for TTL.
[7] As was the case for OTL too.
[8] Yes, this is based off this image for OTL's Living In The Material World...just imagine more Beatles on it.
[9] A bit like OTL's Let It Be cover though with Preston on it.
And there we are, a misfire for The Beatles here and while it would have been easy for TTL to have nothing but success for a still united Beatles here but that would make things boring but a little bit ASB in which success can't last forever and this is an example of this which makes things a little bit more plausible here. But yeah, Everest doesn't do well here and what will Lennon do next? Well, if you know how 1972 went for him IOTL...well.
Anyway, please comment if you want to see what happens next and what'd you think will happen next for the boys and Mr Epstein himself for TTL? Find out next time as we go on through this rather sticky year for The Beatles!