If people think that fits better, I can change it. Always open to suggestions.![]()
Since he fancies control over New England might declare it part of the Kingdom of Carolina/Columbia. Meanwhile the area he has control over stays the Dominon of Virginia.
If people think that fits better, I can change it. Always open to suggestions.![]()
If people think that fits better, I can change it. Always open to suggestions.![]()
It's really up to you. Honestly this story is pretty greatI mean I understand why the name is Columbia but I'd go with Carolina because like the colony, it literally bears his name. Even with his humbled state the mans ego is still larger than himself so I think he'd go for it
![]()
Thanks for the radish change!
Since it's getting to be around 1649 [the OTL year of someone's execution], I'm wondering what Charles is going to do re New England's and New Holland's alliance. It seems the only buffer between these two enemies [which each has a larger territory than Columbia] is New Sweden. So, will Charles somehow get New Sweden to be an ally? Could he somehow correspond with Queen Christina and persuade her that it would be in New Sweden's best interests [and ultimately her own] if the their two domains could ally themselves against these decidedly more Calvinistic adversaries? Could his wife Henrietta Maria of France appeal to Christina's more Catholic sympathies? Also what's become of Henrietta Maria, the Prince of Wales and the rest of their family during all this? This should be quite an interesting set up not just for Charles but the rest of Europe even if a good part of the action takes place in the New World.
Definitely would sound nicer and fits with his personality![]()
I hate to say this, but the entire history of the war shows him as the kind of person who would be a martyr rather than compromise. I agree that realpolitik makes it necessary, I just don't think he'd realize it, or even care.
To be fair, he wasn't opposed to parliaments per say, just any with potential to deny him his absolute authority.
But, why think Charles won't be tarred and feathered and shot by rebel scum like us, even the rebel aristocratic Soutn? Like happened in the UK. Say, when he treats even the local aristocracy as colonial scum? And orders all the effort on his manor so big that'd take over 100 years?
Now, a short story about tarred and feathered and shot could be perfect. And would be plausible.
You aren't thinking we'd like and keep such worst leftover royals that Britain rebelled twice against?
And real Chuckie hated Parliament, and the real Puritans had rebelled against him, and aren't going back.
Royals aren't all a QE. Some are so bad they're rebelled at, like him or George 3rd. Others are Nazis like Eddie VII. Others are not up to the job, like Aethelred whom lost.
Hooray you changed the nameand the map as usual looks great keep it up man loving this TL
![]()