And MacArthur rise from the dead!!
But the War is over. Time for Reconstruction and War crimes.
But the War is over. Time for Reconstruction and War crimes.
The collapse of the United States and its influence resulted in a ripple of instability that badly rocked all of Latin America, coupled with a longer and more severe Depression South America has had some interesting times. Vargas has had to continually deal with communist unrest in Brazil including a couple of full-scale uprisings and a coup attempt resulting in a more authoritarian regime than OTL. Bolivia had a revolution stemming from an even worse defeat in the Chaco War and more intense poverty, and is now under a left-wing socialist dictatorship. TTLs version of the Ecuadorian-Peruvian War resulted in a total Peruvian occupation of Ecuador, and drew in Columbia against Peru. Other countries faced unrest, coups, strikes, what-have-you.
Finally it's over. Now it's time to pick up the pieces, something definitely easier said than done.
Seven years of war, and a complete clusterfuck of a war too. I'm sure the death toll runs into the high single digit millions at least and quite possibly a lot higher.... At least the semi-sorta-kinda democratic socialist faction won. The people are gonna want some sort of welfareish reward for their suffering...
Definitely. What makes this potentially difficult though is that we don't know whether the "new" US will choos to fight Japan (although I would make it a priority to take back Hawaii) or Nazi Germany (unlikely, all things considered).
Are there major partisan operations in America right now or are there just a few holdouts? Did the status of Cuba change with the war over? Is anything going on in Mexico? What are the excess deaths caused by malnutrition/starvation, and associated diseases?
Why and how would the new USA fight a war after it's Civil War? I mean, 7 years of fighting, much of the nation is in ruins. Many are dead.
Because if they don't, then they could well face the threat of wars with external powers. And you just know that the USA isn't just going to roll over and accept the Canadians permanently annexing North Dakota- likewise, the Canadians aren't going to just give North Dakota back to the US of Americans for free, out of the kindness of their hearts. Perhaps in exchange for the USA agreeing to providing them and the rest of the beleaguered Allies with arms, in a diplomatic agreement which includes a lend-lease scheme?
Because if they don't, then they could well face the threat of wars with external powers. And you just know that the USA isn't just going to roll over and accept the Canadians permanently annexing North Dakota- likewise, the Canadians aren't going to just give North Dakota back to the US of Americans for free, out of the kindness of their hearts. Perhaps in exchange for the USA agreeing to providing them and the rest of the beleaguered Allies with arms, in a diplomatic agreement which includes a lend-lease scheme?
Uh, when did Canada annex North Dakota? Sending your army in doesn't equal annexation. If it did, then the UK, France, Low Countries, and Western Germany would all be US states right now. Besides (no offense to North Dakotans), there's no reason whatsoever for Canada to annex North Dakota. Helping out a war-devasted ally, only to take over part of their territory, serving to only (slightly) increase the amount of farmland you control, at the cost of pissing off a nation that is 10x your population? I'm sorry, but Canadians don't have the capacity to be that special kind of petty, stupid asshole.
Er- why are you calling me a stupid asshole?
Yeah, what he said. Sorry for the misunderstanding.He's not. He's saying the Canadians are in no position to be one.