The Southern Railroad's new engines of TTL

The most significant gains the Southern received from the consolidations were the Florida East Coast, which allowed thme to further enter Florida. The Chicago, Terre Hautte, and Southeastern plus the Monon from Monon to Louisville, which gave them Chicago, the NC&StL from Memhpis to Nashville, and the Moblile and Ohio.

But what is truly of note is what they did for new motive power to serve the newly expanded line.

First and foremost, the Florida East Coast engines began to see more use all across the Southern. But of special note were its famous 4-8-2s, which were reclassified Ts-3s, with the other two FEC Mountain types being Ts-2 and Ts-4 respectively. These three classes also had their numbers changed with a 2 in front to the numbers, thus for example, 404 became 2404, or 819 was now 2819. All of which stayed on the southern instead of being sold. In addition, the Southern also had ALCO Richmond build several more of the Ms-3. Adorned in the famous Crescent Green which earlier samples would eventually get too. These engines would go on to serve all across the Southern's passenger train portfolio. From the iconic Crescent to the then new Midwest Palm from Chicago to Miami. One of these engines, 2461, became OTL's counterpart to Mikado 4501 in the Steam Program

Next would be a major freight hauling machine. The Southern ordered several 2-8-4 steamers from Lima based on the C&O/NKP designs. One of these, 2716, famously ran on the southern steam excursion roster in the 70s. These engines were classified the Us-1 type, and would be become the primary freight hauler on lines in Eastern parts of the system. With older mikados and Santa Fes finishing their service on freight in western parts of the system.

Likewise, the Southern also ordered several 4-8-4s from Lima. Very similar to the Southern Pacific GS-2s, the engines were classified Vs-1 and would be the last steamers to haul such iconic Southern trains as The Crescent from DC to Atlanta. These engines were the second most numerous Southern passenger engine, and were adorned in an even more gorgeous form of the Southern Green, as well as a gold shaped eagle above the smokebox. With them in charge, the Ps-4 did have some degree of continued use. With many being streamlined in the style of the famous 1309, for additional power if the need ever arose.

In addition, the TP&W sold off its six 4-8-4s when the PRR and ATSF split the company between each other. The Southern ultimately got them, and much like the ex-FEC Ms-2 Mountains, had more built, and reclassed them as Vs-2. Though these engines retained their original numbers, numbering the total fleet 80-99. These engines would mainly work on freights for much of their lives. Though some were seen on passenger trains ranging from commuter trains to even the Crescent at times. One of the original TP&W engines, number 85, eventually returned to Peoria. One of the southern engines, 92, is now at the NCTM in Spencer, NC.

Lastly, in 1946, the Southern attempted two Ds-1 Duplexes for service on the Crescent from DC to Atlanta. While they weren't bad per se. The Southern chose to instead continue using 4-8-4s mainly. Though the duplexes still saw work on passenger trains like the Crescent.

Many of each type are preserved. Much to the joy of many a Southern rail enthusiast. As for the TP&W 4-8-4s, at least one, numbered 83, is back in Peoria. On display downtown, with many more of its relatives across the nation.
 

Attachments

  • SOU steam power.png
    SOU steam power.png
    10.1 KB · Views: 327
Last edited:
The Atlantic Coast Line R-6: The last ACL steamer.

The Atlantic Coast line never had the best history with 4-8-4s. Their own did rather serious damage to the tracks from Richmond to Florida. Whereas those of the NC&StL and RF&P were mostly kept where they were as a result.

But in 1949, the ACL had hired the Argentine designer Livio Dante Porta. The executives had been visiting Argentina and Western Europe, and were highly impressed by the French designer Andre Chapelon's 2420P 4-8-4, and L. D. Porta's "Argentina" 4-8-0. Thus, they had Porta design this locomotive for them. Unlike Argentina, however, Porta had the freedom of designing a completely new locomotive instead of rebuilding an existing one. Though Porta was explicitely told to use elements of past ACL 4-8-4s, he was able to create a unique engine all his own.

The R-6 4-8-4 was a 2 cylinder powerhouse. It was semi streamlined, like he R-3 and R-4 engines. It had an 8-wheel tender like the R-1s. But, most importantly, had a Gas Producer Combustion system and double Lempor ejectors. The first R-6 was highly successful, easily matching the earlier 4-8-4s that it joined. During a run with the Dixie Limited, it reached 110mph and was able to maintain that for much of the run from Chicago to Nashville.

ACL was highly impressed, and built several more. All were named after important cities on the ACL system. With the first engines being named after Richmond, VA. They were constantly updated as Porta learned more about squeezing more power more economically. The last modification was in the late 1980's. Even if they never replaced their earlier 4-8-4s, the R-6s nonetheless are the staple of ACL passenger steam. Like most other US railroads, the ACL has hardly abandoned steam if at all for the sake of fuel resources.
 
In addition, we have a few wntirely new lines built by some railroads during this time.

The Illinois Central's Nashville division

The Nashville and South Eastern was established in January 1919 to construct a railroad line between Nashville, TN and Atlanta, GA. It was conceived as a way to compete with the pre-existing Nashville, Chattanooga and St. Louis by offering a more direct route from Nashville to Chattanooga which stayed entirely in Tennessee. The Southern and Illinois Central each saw this fledgling little company as becoming a thorn in the side of their common rival, the Louisville and Nashville Railroad, which owned the NC&StL. The SOU and IC provided funds for the railroad and construction began in the early Spring of 1920. By that fall, the NSE had reached Shelbyville, TN and in the late spring of 1921, the NSE reached Chattanooga.

In July of 1923, the company extended its line to Atlanta by building a line of Chickamauga, GA. Then, it east to Rome, and finally Atlanta.

Up until 1924, the Philadelphia Northern only owned leased power from its two backers, and a handful of USRA designs. Mainly 4-6-2s and 2-8-2s, as well as Russian Decapods. But in In 1925, the NSE ordered a series of 4-8-2s from the Lima Locomotive Works for use on fast passenger trains and freights. These engines would proceed to replace some of the Southern and IC steamers on the line that we still in service.

Passenger and freight service began in earnest after construction of the main line was completed in the summer of 1925. The following year, they bought the only inside-cylinder steam engines for use in the United States. Them being a group of 0-6-0 switchers for use mainly in Nashville.

In 1928, the railroad also ordered several 4-8-4s from Lima to use exclusively on its Nashville-Atlanta express trains, demoting most 4-6-2s to mere slower trains. They also ordered from Lima a group of 2-10-4s for heavy freights. These would ultimately turnout to be the last engines they bought.

In 1929, the National Railroad Consolidation Act was passed by Congress. The act was designed to create a group of lines that could enjoy long-term competition with each other. Under this act, the NSE received the half of the Tennessee Central running from Nashville to Hopkinsville, KY.

Shortly after, however, the railroad was absorbed into the Central of Georgia. That said, many of its engines still around (USRA engines, 4-6-2s, 4-8-0s, 2-8-2s, 4-8-2s, 4-8-4s, and 2-10-4s), were continued to be used by the CofG. Almost all of these engine types were once again, still used by the Illinois Central, which took over the CofG in 1948, until that rairload ended its own steam oeprations.

Today, the NSE is still a vital part of the Illinois Central's network. As it is a major source of revenue which lets the IC compete with the Atlantic coast Line and Southern in Midwest-Florida Traffic of both passenger and freight.
 
National High Speed Rail: The Whole Picture

Thanks to the renewal of American railroads thanks to the oil crises of first the early 50s and then the late 70s, passenger rail began to make a dramatic resurgence as it became America's preferred alternative to the automobile. This pro-rail stance common among Americans became even more prominent after and the growing hassle of getting on planes, not to mention weather hazards and more darkly the September 11 attacks. But the story of this is far longer than it seems.

At this time, the Central of Georgia railroad began to build its own line from Chattanooga to Nashville. Though Atlanta was in the original plan, it was decided against so that there would be less need for land. While this did happen, it was not completed until the Illinois Central took over after the war. As a result, the 50% the IC had in the Nashville, Chattanooga, and St. Louis was surrendered to the Atlantic Coast Line. The ACL itself also linked Nashville and Paris, TN with its own line to replace what the Southern got.

Also, many interurbans in the midwest were sold to larger railroads for their use. For example, the Toldeo- Bryan and Ft. Wayne- Logansport interurbans were given to the PRR. Whoch then linked the two to create a corridor they had almost complete domination over. Or the Lima to Cincinnati interurban was given to the C&O for use as a mainline to the Queen City. Many other parts became their own spin off rail lines. With some even becoming tourist lines. For example, the Logansport- Kokomo- Indianapolis interurban became a freight rairload that now host TTL's version of the Indiana Transportation museum.

Lastly, the South Shore, North Shore, and Chicago, Aurora, and Elgin interurbans became one big company. Which was the Chicago, Milwaukee, South Bend, and Elgin: better known as the Lake Shore line. Which proved itself a handy service to people from grater Chicagoland. Including a South Bend- Chicago- Milwaukee service that became The Lake Michigan Limited.

The start point is the speed race in the 1930s between the railroads. Beginning in 1927, when the New York Central began replacing its pacifics with the Hudsons on long distance passenger trains. Thus allowing for faster trains and fewer sections. The Pennsylvania naturally wanted to ape its bitter rival. So in the early to mid 30s it built several 4-8-4 steam engines to replace the K4 Pacifics on most passenger trains of theirs. This was actually their second attempt at a 4-8-4. The previous one, the R2, having been a M1 Mountain with a deeper firebox and trailing truck to accommodate it. However, this engine, called the R3 would be different. It was instead a fusion of Lima's Super Power design, Altoona's brains, and Baldwin's finishing touches. The R3 would be TTL's inspiration for the french designer Andre Chapelon's 4-8-4s, C&O Greenbriers, the Reading T1s (now the B&O W-5s ITTL), the SAR class 25 engines, and many more steamers. Despite already having plenty of steamers for passenger trains, though, the PRR also developed the T1 duplexes, as the ultimate passenger steamer.

The New York Central and Burlington Route also got into the battle, resulting in the Denver Zephyr and the 20th Century Limited (the latter eventually becoming the Lake Shore Limited) in the early to mid 1930s having big steam power (diesels are incapable of such speeds with 1930s technology, I think) and operational speeds of better than 120 MPH. The Pennsy steam trio (K4, R3, and T1) and the NYC steamers blew the Europeans out of the water in terms of steam speeds, with both putting up numbers of better than 150 mph all-out on test runs and further narrowing the schedules of the name trains. Meanwhile, Santa Fe, Union Pacific, Southern Pacific, and Great Northern inaugurated their great streamliners, introducing the Super Chief, City of San Francisco, Empire Builder, Sunset Limited and Coast Daylight into the world of railroading. This by the end of the 1930s caught America's imagination, and the western streamlined trains soon began dispensing with their coach cars (or improving them) in favor of coach trains that run similar routes. Following the Santa Fe's example with its Super Chief and El Capitan. The Southern US railroads soon follow, with the Southern's Crescent, ACL's Champion, and SAL's Silver Star as a result. Several midwestern railroads made up trains to match up with the top-line streamliners, producing the IC's City of New Orleans, NP's North Coast Limited, Rock Island's Rocky Mountain Rocket and others.

This would be further taken up after the war. When the Esch-Cummins consolidation act was finished. Many trains continued under their new owners. While many more joined the fray. Beginning when Santa Fe created the Missouri Chief, a St. Louis counterpart of the Super Chief. Meanwhile, the Atlantic Coast Line upgraded The Dixie Limited, which served Chicago- Jacksonville- Miami, with their "Yellow Belly" 4-8-4s (The NC&StL 4-8-4s of OTL), as the main power.

In addition, new rail lines were built. Including the IC's own line from Nashville to Atlanta (much of it was actually built in the days when EH Harriman owned the IC and CofG). While the SP built new lines from Los Angeles to San Diego and the San Joaquin Valley. As well as a line from Las Vegas to Phoenix, AZ.

Meanwhile, the Santa fe rerouted its mainline from Las Vegas, NM to Belen by rerouting it via Santa Fe, NM, and dropping the bypass from Belen out of Albuquerque. As such, Belen made a dramatic resurgence as one of the Santa Fe's most important yards. As did Avard, OK after the Santa Fe acquired the St. Louis- San Fransisco.

Lastly, the Grant Northern, now owning the former IC line from Chicago to Omaha and S. Dakota, built a line to link the Twin Cities and Madison, WI. To create their own service independent of the Burlington.

Legal changes allowed the railroads to charge what they like on the passenger trains for extra fare, allowing the railroads to have the funds to continually improve their services. Out west, luxury trains ruled, with the Super Chief, City of San Francisco, and Empire Builder setting the standard by which everyone else was judged. A deal between the Great Northern and Southern Pacific created the Coast Daylight, a Seattle-San Diego/Los Angeles train which was an instant hit, and the Western Pacific/Rio Grande/Burlington Route California Zephyr, now under complete control of the Missouri Pacific Railroad, being another huge hit owing to the scenic charms of the route. To say nothing of the California Eagle, its St. Louis equivalent. Also, the Southern Pacific expanded the Golden State, a LA- Chicago train train previously run with the Rock Island, to higher quality. Then it also introduced a St. Louis streamliner in competition with the Missouri Chief, called the Cotton Belt Limited.

Recognizing the jet age, the trains one by one got new equipment, diesels replacing steam power mainly in the form of EMD units and ALCO PAs, (though ITTL, most railroads, and especially eastern railroads like the C&O, PRR, and the latter's subsidiary N&W were far slower in that regard) and ever-better equipment. This reduced passenger losses (and even allowed profits in some cases), and while some contraction was inevitable, by the late 1950s the trains that do live on being able to prosper based on a clientele that wanted comfort as well as speed, and railroads that were prosperous enough to do this properly did indeed do so, with full dining cars (with ever-better fare) and innovative moves to get more passengers on the routes making it easier and easier to operate the trains.

The New York Central's Lake Shore Limited, Pennsylvania's Broadway Limited, and the Chesapeake and Ohio's Nickel Plate Limited ruled the New York-Chicago traffic. The Super Chief, Golden State and City of Los Angeles lugged it out over the Chicago-Los Angeles route. The PRR/N&W Cavalier and the C&O's George Washington duked it out in Chicago- Vorginia traffic. The California Zephyr and City of San Francisco fought for the Chicago-San Francisco market and the Empire Builder and North Coast Limited fought to Chicago-Seattle, with the by then hugely-busy Coast Daylight linking the West Coast. Santa Fe's Texas Chief soon also ran between Chicago and Houston, and the El Capitan became the night train complement to the Super Chief. The Southern's Southern Crescent, the ACL Champion, and the IC (formerly SAL)'s Silver Star owned the Northeast Corridor to the South markets, with the Southern Crescent going to Atlanta, Birmingham and New Orleans while the Silver Star and Silver Meteor raced on to Florida. Lastly, the Midwest- South market was almost completely dominated by the IC, which ran the City of New Orleans, and the ACL, running the Dixie Limited to Florida.

All by the late 1950s had given up on trying to compete with airlines on speed and instead fancied themselves as luxury hotels on rails, and it showed in ever-better amenities and ever-bigger consists. However, these tactics for the most part worked, and by the early 1960s, airlines that couldn't easily get into domestic markets (Pan Am in particular) were teaming up with the passenger trains to act as feeders into the airline network, using connections between the cities and airports that both sides (and the cities they served) were eager to build. Furthermore, reductions in freight traffic on the Northeast Corridor for the Pennsylvania opened up new possibilities, and the completion of a tunnel under Manhattan between the Pennsylvania and Grand Central Stations in 1962 opened up possibilities for through trains between as far apart as Boston and Washington, and the Pennsylania's trains of the corridor were incredibly busy, showing that if the speed and frequency were there, the possibility of wide-scale passenger traffic was there. Night passenger trains by the early 1960s were adding to this, as the New York Central's Watchman, which began operations in 1958, was a sign of what was to come - a night train with a first-class restaurant on board, it was meant for business travelers to get on after dinner in New York, sleep most of the way to Chicago, and eat a very good breakfast on the train before the train arrived in Chicago, and as if to make the point, the Watchman's sleeping cars came with showers and a robe service, so that riders could feel good and refreshed when they got off the train at either end of the route. This train was also unique in that it was one of the last major passenger trains hauled by steam. With the J-4 series of Hudsons, which were among the last mainline steamers in America, being used to haul the train until 1980, when diesels took over almost all the major NYC passenger trains. Likewise, the PRR created their own counterpart called The Keystone Limited. Which ran to Chicago via Columbus, and was also pulled by their newest steam passenger power at first, in their case, the T1 Duplexes.

The authorization of the Shinkansen's construction in 1959 did not go unnoticed in America, and most of the major rail lines all helped pay for part of the financial cost of the building of the Tokaido Shinkansen in return for understanding how the route worked. They, like many others, were more than a little surprised with the results of the Shinkansen, and the New York Central began planning a route built to similar standard before the Shinkansen went into service in October 1964.

Such was the success of the Shinkansen that, despite the huge costs involved, the the Pennsylvania Railroad and the New Haven Railroad began to collaborate on their own attempt. Together they upgraded the NH line from Boston to New York and the PRR from there to Washington DC. This new operation, which became known as the Metroliner, was inaugurated in 1967, and soon it was considered by many superior to the airlines that operated between the same areas. In no small part due to its superior dining options, clean conditions, and service at reasonably high speeds even in the face of poor weather. Concurrently, the Pennsy also used the same treatment to upgrade the Pittsburgher, its NY-Pittsburgh passenger train, freight rail was naturally included in its plans for faster trains. The end result was the Keystone Corridor, a perfectly speedy rail service from New York to Pittsburgh. This also allowed the PRR to retire many of its steamers or sell them off to preservationists. With many K4 Pacifics being sold to museums, parks, enthusiasts, and pretty much anyone who wanted a steamer.

All too soon, the success of this service was noticed in the West by the Southern Pacific. They themselves proceeded to make similar upgrades to the route of their Coast Daylight passenger service from San Fransisco to Los Angeles. This line had already been upgraded via the use of EMD diesels and concrete ties in the place of wood ties and steamers. But by 1975, the SP had created a high speed transit operation on par with that of Japan. The SP even went up to 11 in trying to beat the Santa Fe in Chicago- LA traffic. As it took the flatter terrain of the ex-Rock Island line and made similar modifications, thus also upgrading the Golden State passenger train.

This plan led President JFK to establish the High Speed Ground Transportation Act of 1965, which both helped to fund and develop American high-speed trains and their infrastructure and to push for regulatory improvements. Pan Am also bought in, offering to assist the NYC and SP with the high-speed lines.

Eventually, the Chicago area was next to be subject to the new high speed rail craze. But it was the New York Central that held most of the cards in the Midwest. They initially started with the James Whitcomb Riley on the Chicago-Indianapolis-Cincinnati mainline in 1975. This newly improved service was a success, and soon, the NYC used the line splitting at Greensburg to create another high speed service to Louisville. This was followed shortly after with the upgrading of the lines from Cleveland to Chicago and Cincinnati. But the NYC was not going to stop there. For it expanded the scope of their higher speed rail program, and made the upgrades all the way to Buffalo, NY.

The effect was hard to understate. New York City's problems in the 1970s led to an economic boom in upstate New York (particularly Troy and Albany), as people chose to live further away from the crime and poverty stricken big city while still having access to it. The PRR's Metroliner services were so popular by the mid-1970s that it actually caused a reduction in air traffic in the Northeast Corridor, and Atlantic City saw a major revival of its fortunes in the 1970s as travelers could reach it more easily. It was a similar situation in California, and perhaps more importantly the lines themselves proved to be hugely profitable for the Southern Pacific, New York Central and Pennsylvania.

In 1973, the Southern Railroad took a note of the Pennsy's book. Then it made heavy conversions to their ex- Florida East Coast mainline and included a new branch to Orlando. The end result of this was Brightline. A successful passenger service which naturally won the hearts of many Floridans fed up with traffic jams and who felt a plane ride between the two cities was absurd.

The Baltimore and Ohio was generally not a part of the operations. But with a few exceptions. Namely, it received the exclusive contract with both the Southern and ACL to shuttle their Cincinnati- bound trains up to Detroit. This did eventually motivate the B&O to try and compete with the IC in the Chicago- St. Louis market. As well as make a few attempts at their own long distance train. Though the only one that truly stuck was the Big Apple Limited. Which from from New York to Chicago via Baltimore and Akron.

Amtrak was formed in 1967 to co-ordinate the passenger rail services both public and private in the United States. Such was the success of the high-speed lines that others soon scrambled to jump on board. While the NYC began high-speed operations on its busy Chicago-Detroit Wolverine route in time for the American Bicentennial in 1976. Amtrak from its formation was meant to co-ordinate private-sector operations as well as take over those of railroads that sought to exit the passenger business, though that scenario never happened yet. The bill that created Amtrak also provided funds and organization for cities to take over money-losing commuter operations, which proved a hugely-beneficial provision for railroads and created multiple agencies, including Metra in Chicago, Metrolink in Los Angeles, New Jersey Transit in New Jersey, Caltrain in the San Francisco Bay Area and SEPTA in Philadelphia, to handle the commuter operations. By the 1980s, cities both large and small that had troubles with traffic congestion were looking at commuter rail as a way of alleviating congestion.

In addition, Lima's last attempts at steam power were made in the 60s and 70s. As they built the Lima Standards, which were meant to be American counterparts to the British Rail standard steam engines. They incorporated the latest developments in steam power from across the world, but were no match for the grow of diesels in general, despite the then ongoing oil crisis. As only a few actually saw service on Amtrak, with many actually going to preservationist or museums, where they actually ran. In addition, the last freight hauling steam engines in the US were built by Livio Dante Porta. Most famously a series of 2-10-0s he called "Los Lobos Rojos". Though again, only a handful saw actual revenue service. With more going to other countries or tourist railroads. Today though, plenty of both the Lima and Porta engines can be seen in Mexico.

One of Amtrak's long-term plans from its creation was to aid railroads in high-speed rail in the Midwest, but with the New York Central already having done most of the work in the eastern half. Plus Illinois Central upgrading the Chicago-St. Louis Green Diamond and Milwaukee Road its Chicago-Twin Cities Hiawatha, Amtrak soon was working on filling in gaps, planning out high-speed service from St. Louis to Cincinnati (ACL), Chicago to Cedar Rapids and Omaha, a second Twin Cities line via Madison (both Union Pacific), and lastly a Detroit- Cleveland line. On the latter route, the NYC beat Amtrak to the punch, their profitable lines in New York and Michigan leading to them having the confidence to plan an entire Chicago-New York high speed route, which they planned on opening in 1986. The ACL built a new line for themselves from Washington to Newport News and Norfolk, opening the line in 1984. SP's high-speed lines extended from Bakersfield to Sacramento in stages between 1976 and 1980, and the company built across Altamont Pass to San Diego, Oakland and San Francisco, connecting San Francisco to the California High-Speed Rail Network in 1985.

As the high-speed routes got built, the freight railroads' confidence in their long-distance trains grew, and the development of Amtrak's Superliners in the early 1980s (themselves clearly inspired by the Hi-Level Coaches built for Santa Fe's passenger trains in the 1960s) was an impetus for railroads to both use the Superliners and develop their own double-deck car designs. Southern Pacific's 'California Cars' and 'Cuisine Cars' were one such result, the latter being rapidly copied by the Santa Fe for its high-end Super Chief. These cars also were used on the SP's long distance trains, those being the Sunset Limited, Golden State, and the new Cotton Belt Limited to St. Louis.

The MoPac also expanded its scope of service. Including the continuation of the Aztec Eagle, its joint work with the Mexican Railroads to haul passengers from St. Louis to Mexico City. they eventually introduced a Chicago counterpart, the Aztec Zephyr.

Amtrak, pushed by politicians, began to co-ordinate the trains of the name railroads with their own trains, serving the lower-demand areas with traffic to the privately-held routes, though Amtrak scored some big winners on their own. The willingness to have Amtrak's trains feed into the other named trains was very much appreciated by the other railroads, and so Amtrak's desired schedule shifts to accommodate connections were by and large accepted by the freight railroads, who noticed in the 1980s a sizable growth in ridership. Both the desire to have good train travel (helped by the growing high-speed network) and the luxurious trains themselves (by the 1980s, all of the named trains ran with three-unit dining car sets that served meals as good as most restaurants, along with lounge cars with leather seats and audio-on-demand systems with headphones, all trains used all bedrooms as roomettes disappeared in the 1970s) made sure the number of riders on the trains grew dramatically. By 1990, routes like the Super Chief, Empire Builder, California Zephyr and Lake Shore Limited were routinely operating in multiple sections and the night train services were highly-popular on eastern routes.

The following is a list of long distance and high speed services that were introduced during this era, separated by railroad.

Amtrak
  • Gulf Coast: New Orleans- Mobile- Jacksonville
  • The Music City Star: St. Louis- Evansville- Nashville- Columbia- Charleston
  • Pioneer: Phoenix- Las Vegas- Salt Lake City- Boise- Portland- Seattle
  • The International: Chicago- Detroit- Toronto- Montreal
  • The Floridian: Chicago- Indianapolis- Cincinnati- Chattanooga- Atlanta- Orlando-Tampa
  • The Atlantic City Limited: Atlantic City- Philadelphia- Pittsburgh- Columbus- Detroit
Atlantic Coast Line
  • The Dixie Limited: Chicago- Evansville- Nashville- Chattanooga- Atlanta- Jacksonville- Miami
  • The Ohio River Runner: St. Louis- Evansville- Louisville- Cincinnati
  • The Hummingbird: Cincinnati- Louisville- Nashville- Birmingham- New Orleans
  • The Flamingo: Cincinnati- Knoxille- Atlanta- Jacksonville- Miami
Aitchison, Topeka, and Santa Fe
  • The Missouri Chief: St. Louis- Tulsa- Avard, OK- Amarillo- Belen- Flagstaff- Los Angeles
  • The Souix Chief: Twin Cities- Des Moines- Kansas City- La Junta- Santa Fe- Albaquerque- Belen- Flagstaff- Los Angeles
  • The Texan: St. Louis- Tulsa- Oklahoma City- Ft. Worth/Dallas- Houston
Baltimore and Ohio
  • The Big Apple Limited: NYC- Baltimore- Pittsburgh- Akron- Chicago
  • The Buffalo Limited: Buffalo- Scranton- New York- Philadelphia- Baltimore- Washington DC
  • Cincinnati- Detroit feeder service for numerous SOU and ACL trains
Chesapeake and Ohio
  • The Nickel Plate Limited: New York- Bethlehem- Wilkes-Barre- Buffalo- Erie- Cleveland- Ft. Wayne- Chicago
  • The Queen City Limited: New York- Bethlehem- Sayre- Buffalo- Erie- Cleveland- Lima- Cincinnati
  • The George Washington: Chicago- Ft. Wayne- Cincinnati- Charleston- Washington DC
Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul, and Pacific
  • The Twin Cities Hiawatha: Chicago- Milwaukee- Twin Cities
  • The Missouri Hiawatha: Chicago- Davenport- Kansas City
Erie
  • The Baltimore Limited: Baltimore- Pittsburgh- Cleveland
Great Northern
  • The Empire Builder: Chicago- Madison- Twin Cities- Fargo- Havre- Spokane- Seattle
  • The Oregon Limited: Chicago- Madison- Twin Cities- Fargo- Havre- Spokane- Portland
  • The North Coast Limited: Chicago- Madison- Twin Cities- Bismark- Billings- Missoula- Spokane- Seattle
Illinois Central
  • The City Nashville: Chicago- Evansville- Nashville- Chattanooga- Savannah- Jacksonville- Miami
  • The City of Birmingham: Washington DC- Richmond- Raleigh- Atlanta- Birmingham
Missouri Pacific
  • The California Eagle: St. Louis- Kansas City- Salina- Pueblo- Salt Lake City- Oakland
  • The Aztec Zephyr: Chicago- Quincy- Kansas City- Ft. Worth- Austin- San Antonio- Laredo- Mexico City
New York Central
  • The Watchman: Chicago- New York
  • The New Englander: Chicago- Toledo- Cleveland- Buffalo- Albany- Boston
Pennsylvania Railroad/ Norfolk and Western
  • The Keystone Limited: New York- Philadelphia- Pittsburgh- Columbus- Chicago
  • The Powhatan Arrow: Chicago- Ft. Wayne- Cincinnati- Roanoke- Norfolk
  • The Pocahontas: Detroit- Columbus- Roanoke- Norfolk
  • The Cavalier: St. Louis- Indianapolis- Cincinnati- Roanoke- Norfolk
  • The Hoosier State: Detroit- Toldeo- Ft. Wayne- Indianapolis- Louisville
Southern Railroad
  • The Queen-Crescent: Cincinnati- Chattanooga- Birmingham- New Orleans
  • The Chicago Palm: Chicago- Louisville- Chattanooga- Atlanta- Jacksonville- Miami
  • The Tennesseean: Washington DC- Roanoke (Via N&W)- Knoxville- Nashville- Memphis
  • The Brightline: Miami- Orlando
Southern Pacific
  • The Cotton Belt Limited: St. Louis- Pine Bluff- Texarkana- Corsicana- San Antonio- El Paso- Tuscon- Phoenix- Los Angeles
Union Pacific
  • The City of San Antonio: Kansas City- Vinta- Dallas- Houston
 
Last edited:
A couple things:

You have the C&O trains out of New York stopping at Sayre, Pennsylvania. Probably not the optimal choice for a stop unless you're changing locomotives or something - Sayre was the Lehigh Valley's big shop, but the town itself has a population of approximately seven (OK, I'm exaggerating, but not by much). Wilkes-Barre would be a better choice. And if either the Nickel Plate or QC Limited stops at Bethlehem, the other should stop at Allentown.

If we did divergences here like on the old Othertimelines board, I'd have a divergence where the B&O sells the old Lackawanna, which doesn't really seem to benefit it very much, to the Erie, which would then subsequently change its corporate name to "Erie Lackawanna." The EL could then reinstitute trains like the Phoebe Snow and Lake Cities as part of the new rail revival. They could ply somewhat different routes, but the Pheebs, at least, I would suggest departing New York and making stops in Scranton, Binghamton, Buffalo, Cleveland and Toledo before tying up in Chicago. As with the other trains you mention, the EL's departure and arrival times in Chicago would be coordinated with those of connecting trains. As it stands now, you have little or no service to either Scranton or Binghamton.

I would assume also that on the drawing board would be a plan to expand service by introducing a class of secondary trains to supplement the higher-speed trains, making more stops that would be relatively too small for the more important trains. On the C&O's ex-LV route, for example, the secondary trains could make stops at locations like Flemington, N.J.; Easton, Lehighton, and Jim Thorpe (Mauch Chunk) along the Lehigh River in Pennsylvania; Towanda on the upper Susquehanna in PA (especially for any trains geared toward hiking/fishing travel); and Ithaca, Geneva, and Rochester, New York. Secondary trains on the EL (ex-DL&W) would probably be making stops in Summit, Morristown, Dover, and maybe Lake Hopatcong, N.J.; Stroudsburg, Mount Pocono, and another Pocono Mountains stop (Gouldsboro or Tobyhanna) east of Scranton; and smaller cities like Hornell, New York. And that, of course, is exclusive of the New York commuter districts on both lines.
 
A couple things:

If we did divergences here like on the old Othertimelines board, I'd have a divergence where the B&O sells the old Lackawanna, which doesn't really seem to benefit it very much, to the Erie, which would then subsequently change its corporate name to "Erie Lackawanna." The EL could then reinstitute trains like the Phoebe Snow and Lake Cities as part of the new rail revival. They could ply somewhat different routes, but the Pheebs, at least, I would suggest departing New York and making stops in Scranton, Binghamton, Buffalo, Cleveland and Toledo before tying up in Chicago. As with the other trains you mention, the EL's departure and arrival times in Chicago would be coordinated with those of connecting trains. As it stands now, you have little or no service to either Scranton or Binghamton.

Well, giving the DLW to the Erie give it a monopoly in that part of the region due to them being parallel roads. Which we are trying to avoid. So I'm afraid I can't. Besides, like what was said at first, the DL&W fits in well with the RDG and CNJ lines.
 
Well, giving the DLW to the Erie give it a monopoly in that part of the region due to them being parallel roads. Which we are trying to avoid. So I'm afraid I can't. Besides, like what was said at first, the DL&W fits in well with the RDG and CNJ lines.

In what region? There is no point on the Erie or DL&W aside from the likes of Hancock, New York or Johnsonburg, New Jersey that is not served by another railroad. There are competing routes serving every major point I can think of as well as the DL&W's end points of Buffalo and New York. To argue that an EL merger isn't permissible in this structure because of a lack of competition doesn't make sense.

Also, I don't think the DL&W fits it at all well with the Reading and CNJ. Those two lines are essentially a competing east-west system serving New York (so merging the DL&W with them would swallow up a competing route, the thing you say you're trying to avoid). Both interchanged some north-south traffic with the DL&W, but not in a big way. And their routes don't line up, particularly. Giving the DL&W to the B&O gives the B&O an appendage that goes up to Buffalo for no reason, especially since the B&O owns the BR&P and gets to Buffalo more expeditiously that way, which seems a big waste of the money that was spent on the whole Lackawanna Cutoff-Nicholson Viaduct upgrades of the 1910s era. The DL&W's OTL western connection was the Nickel Plate, which isn't going to feed traffic to the DL&W ITTL because the C&O is a competitor. If you don't think the DL&W should go with the Erie, I really think you should consider allocating it to another road that would have some reason to use it for access to New York - one of the Canadian roads, perhaps.
 
In what region? There is no point on the Erie or DL&W aside from the likes of Hancock, New York or Johnsonburg, New Jersey that is not served by another railroad. There are competing routes serving every major point I can think of as well as the DL&W's end points of Buffalo and New York. To argue that an EL merger isn't permissible in this structure because of a lack of competition doesn't make sense.

Also, I don't think the DL&W fits it at all well with the Reading and CNJ. Those two lines are essentially a competing east-west system serving New York (so merging the DL&W with them would swallow up a competing route, the thing you say you're trying to avoid). Both interchanged some north-south traffic with the DL&W, but not in a big way. And their routes don't line up, particularly. Giving the DL&W to the B&O gives the B&O an appendage that goes up to Buffalo for no reason, especially since the B&O owns the BR&P and gets to Buffalo more expeditiously that way, which seems a big waste of the money that was spent on the whole Lackawanna Cutoff-Nicholson Viaduct upgrades of the 1910s era. The DL&W's OTL western connection was the Nickel Plate, which isn't going to feed traffic to the DL&W ITTL because the C&O is a competitor. If you don't think the DL&W should go with the Erie, I really think you should consider allocating it to another road that would have some reason to use it for access to New York - one of the Canadian roads, perhaps.


OK. Let's just focus on what we an indeed agree on for now. I may consider it, but I don't know. What I do know for sure is that whatever happens, the Reading T1s are still built, but as B&O engines. The W-5 class if I do keep the B&O and DL&W together.
 
I would assume also that on the drawing board would be a plan to expand service by introducing a class of secondary trains to supplement the higher-speed trains, making more stops that would be relatively too small for the more important trains. On the C&O's ex-LV route, for example, the secondary trains could make stops at locations like Flemington, N.J.; Easton, Lehighton, and Jim Thorpe (Mauch Chunk) along the Lehigh River in Pennsylvania; Towanda on the upper Susquehanna in PA (especially for any trains geared toward hiking/fishing travel); and Ithaca, Geneva, and Rochester, New York. Secondary trains on the EL (ex-DL&W) would probably be making stops in Summit, Morristown, Dover, and maybe Lake Hopatcong, N.J.; Stroudsburg, Mount Pocono, and another Pocono Mountains stop (Gouldsboro or Tobyhanna) east of Scranton; and smaller cities like Hornell, New York. And that, of course, is exclusive of the New York commuter districts on both lines.

I think that is indeed what I'd probably do. With perhaps having 4-6-2 steamers finishing their services there.

The main thing with the B&O and DLW is that it, like I said, links well with the RDG and CNJ in the east as well as the BR&P in the west and it will eliminate the parallel lines that would have been created under the C&O/NKP system. I also imagined there perhaps could also be the acquisition of the Fallbrook Route and several other shortlines in PA, so the B&O can use the DL&W to its full potential. (The Scranton-Jersey City part at least).
 
The Fallbrook Route map is similar to the idea I had in the Fix Your Hometown timeline for an expanded EL, so I think it would probably work if the B&O were to cobble together those lines. Would require some new construction and some upgrades in central and western Pennsylvania, but you don't appear adverse to new construction.

That would still leave the DL&W north of Scranton underutilized, though, which would make the stockholders of the DL&W very unhappy, insofar as all that money in the 1910s was spent on the massive rebuilding of the line between Scranton and Binghamton. So in that case, here's my suggestion: the B&O takes the DL&W east and south (Bloomsburg Division) of Scranton and pairs it with the Reading-BR&P-new construction between Northumberland, Pennsylvania and Cleveland, Ohio to create its through east-west route. In Scranton, that includes Taylor and Hampton yards and the downtown Scranton and Keyser Valley shops. The B&O then sells the DL&W north and west of Scranton to the D&H (or whoever gets the D&H ITTL; I think it was the B&M, IIRC). At a price commensurate with the cost of building the line. That allows the D&H/B&M to (as in OTL in 1981) make the ex-DL&W between Scranton and Binghamton its north-south mainline, making good use of Nicholson Viaduct and the upgraded route. The D&H can then either abandon its old mainline, with its tortuous grades over Ararat Mountain, between Scranton and Binghamton, or - since that line was technically leased from the Erie - let it revert back to Erie ownership, with the Erie using it as a branch to Scranton. (The D&H/B&M would need trackage rights from the junction with the old mainline about three miles to Taylor Yard, where it would cross the Lackawanna River onto the old D&H mainline; the D&H/B&M would also presumably retain the portion of the old D&H main between Scranton and Carbondale as a branch line.) The B&O could then inaugurate its own version of the Phoebe Snow, which would run something like New York-Morristown-Scranton-Wilkes Barre-Williamsport-Cleveland-Toledo-Chicago. Maybe with a section running Allentown-Reading-Philadelphia (over the former CNJ and RDG) that would connect at Scranton or Wilkes-Barre.

Does this work for you?
 

The Fallbrook Route map is similar to the idea I had in the Fix Your Hometown timeline for an expanded EL, so I think it would probably work if the B&O were to cobble together those lines. Would require some new construction and some upgrades in central and western Pennsylvania, but you don't appear adverse to new construction.

That would still leave the DL&W north of Scranton underutilized, though, which would make the stockholders of the DL&W very unhappy, insofar as all that money in the 1910s was spent on the massive rebuilding of the line between Scranton and Binghamton. So in that case, here's my suggestion: the B&O takes the DL&W east and south (Bloomsburg Division) of Scranton and pairs it with the Reading-BR&P-new construction between Northumberland, Pennsylvania and Cleveland, Ohio to create its through east-west route. In Scranton, that includes Taylor and Hampton yards and the downtown Scranton and Keyser Valley shops. The B&O then sells the DL&W north and west of Scranton to the D&H (or whoever gets the D&H ITTL; I think it was the B&M, IIRC). At a price commensurate with the cost of building the line. That allows the D&H/B&M to (as in OTL in 1981) make the ex-DL&W between Scranton and Binghamton its north-south mainline, making good use of Nicholson Viaduct and the upgraded route. The D&H can then either abandon its old mainline, with its tortuous grades over Ararat Mountain, between Scranton and Binghamton, or - since that line was technically leased from the Erie - let it revert back to Erie ownership, with the Erie using it as a branch to Scranton. (The D&H/B&M would need trackage rights from the junction with the old mainline about three miles to Taylor Yard, where it would cross the Lackawanna River onto the old D&H mainline; the D&H/B&M would also presumably retain the portion of the old D&H main between Scranton and Carbondale as a branch line.) The B&O could then inaugurate its own version of the Phoebe Snow, which would run something like New York-Morristown-Scranton-Wilkes Barre-Williamsport-Cleveland-Toledo-Chicago. Maybe with a section running Allentown-Reading-Philadelphia (over the former CNJ and RDG) that would connect at Scranton or Wilkes-Barre.

Does this work for you?

Maybe. But OTOH, I prefer not to split up too many rasil lines. I will consider it though. In the meantime. I plan to list a detailed list of stream-liners operating by the 1982 of TTL.
 
Great Northern presents you the biggest financial issue of them all - the Great Northern, Northern Pacific and Chicago, Burlington and Quincy all had common ownership by the late 1910s, and passing the CB&Q to the Missouri Pacific results in a huge financial headache, particularly since the rest of the Hill lines all had common ownership. Better idea would be to split it between the Great Northern and Missouri Pacific, giving the northern half of the CB&Q to the Great Northern and the southern half (from Denver south on its former Colorado and Southern main line and its route through Texas) to the Missouri Pacific.

Your issues there do bring up a logical point. As the CBQ and GN were indeed under shared ownership, and the GN relied on it to get to Chicago.

The former criticism is something I would have to find a way to remedy. But the latter issue is already taken care of, as they can link to Chicago through a combination of the Minneapolis and St. Paul. Then the Chicago Central and Pacific, which has been given to them from the IC.

Above from that, I imagined that similar to how the Burlngton Northern created the Twin Cities- Madison- Miilwaukee- Chicago route of your TL, the GN could perhaps do likewise, or at least link to the CC&P branch to Madison.
 
Actually, I'm leaving my revised All Aboard america timeline where it is for a bit. Mostly so I can get feedback on my current set of ideas right here.

If anyone has any ideas to supplement or replace mine let me know. Here are my first ideas for after WW2, with many ideas being borrowed from those of @TheMann
  • 1920s: The Act is unanimously passed after mass negotiation with the railroads.
    • 1925-1927: Phase 1 takes place, merging the small railroads and short lines. Like the Detroit & Mackinac being merged into the Pere Marquette.
    • 1921: The Pennsylvania railroad purchases several hindered miles of interurban line from Toledo to Logansport via Ft. Wayne. Intending to create a new line from it. A side effect is that electrification of the NE Corridor is put on hold, albeit only for a brief while, and the NEC Electrification is still completed before the war.
    • 1922: The NKP also purchases interurban from Cleveland to Cincinnati for use as a link to Cincinnati and a better link to the Chessie.
    • The south Shore, North Shore, Chicago Aurora and Elgin, and Illinois Terminal merge with several smaller interurban lines in Illinois. Eventually permitting the new line to act as a bypass for the big lines away from Chicago.
    • The Erie railroad purchases the most interurban lines in the Midwest. Including the Ft. Wayne- Muncie- Indianapolis- Louisville Indiana Railroad Line. Plus the same network's line from Lafayette to Hamilton, OH. Then they build their own line from Lafayette to their mainline in North Judson, IN.
    • The IC meanwhile purchases several right of ways from Louisville to Cincinnati. Allowing them to eventually expand the Irvin S. Cobb later on.
    • The Pere Marquette extend their line in Michigan a bit further to Mackinaw Island.
  • 1930s: The Great Depression
    • Phase two of the consolidation project is severely hampered by the Depression, and happens later in the decade while the railroads try to recover with the help of FDR's Administration.
    • 1937-1940: The medium roads like the Reading and Jersey Central are merged, as are among others the Minneapolis & St. Louis taking and Chicago Central and the Lehigh Valley and Nickel Plate, and L&N taking over the C&EI and their stake in the NC&StL.
      • By the end of phase 2, most of the NE lines are complete. Specifically, those being the PRR (which runs the N&W as a semi independent company until later on), NYC, B&O, and Erie.
    • The RF&P builds a line of their own from Richmond to Norfolk, before its split between the ACL and SAL. RF&P has semi-independent management even under ACL/SAL rule. The ACL meanwhile buys several 2-8-4s and 4-8-4s to the design of theirs. While the SAL uses their own diesels.
    • The SP links their Santa Ana branch to San Diego, then considers building a new line from LA to Vegas, but decide against it for the time being.
    • The ATSF builds their own line linking Austin and San Antonio to the FWD Metroplex via Temple. This is followed shortly after by extending the Oakdale, LA line to New Orleans.
    • The B&O teams up with the NYC to build a new mainline from Pittsburgh to Dubois then Williamsport, then going over Reading and Lackawanna track to New York. Allowing the B&O to better compete with the PRR. This partnership latter helps the NYC operate high speed trains to DC.
    • The IC makes plans to build a new line from Nashville to Chattanooga to link with the CofG. They start out with aid from the Tennessee Valley Authority. Though they only reach Shelbyville before WW2 puts the project on hold.
    • 1933: After several attempts at finding a replacement for the aging K4s, the PRR creates the R3, which could be described as a fusion of the C&OP J-3a, SAR 25NC, and Reading T1, with a very slight dash of ATSF 3751.
    • 1934: The UP introduces the M-1000 diesel, which is put on service from Omaha to Cheyenne. The Burlington Zephyr soon follows, creating the Streamliner era.
    • 1936-1938: The ATSF, PRR, B&O, SP, SOU, ACL, and NYC all streamline various 4-6-2/4-6-4 steamers for use on new streamlined trains. The ATSF's streamlined Hudsons are like 3460, but with a version of the war bonnet livery. Meanwhile, their streamlined Pacifics are more like those of the C&EI.
    • The southern orders several more engines to the designs of the newly acquired Florida East Coast

  • 1940s: World war 2 and the immediate aftermath
    • New motive power is largely restricted as OTL. So the PRR builds the J1s from C&O T1s and the like.
    • The SOU, right before the war, orders several 4-8-4s from Lima akin to the SP GS2s, same with several 2-8-4s called Peidmonts.
    • After the war, the PRR purchases the T1 and Q2 like OTL. Though they are alright, the R3 4-8-4 remains the true king of PRR steam.
    • An oil crisis arises when he Middle East boycotts the west over support of Israel. Though it ends in time for the Korean war to be fought, the impact still happens, and Lima takes advantage of that to continue promoting new steamers.
    • The C&O, after taking up the Nickel Plate and its lines, goes through with the Chessie streamliner. Though power comes in the form of Lima's new 4-8-6 "Ohio" types. Which begin the last stand of purely American-designed steamers.
    • The Union Pacific makes the Super 800s.
    • The NYC has the steamers listed here built into the 50s. As well as a group of Lima-built 2-10-4s which work the Water Level Route.
    • In 1948, the Southern builds a line to Chicago using an interurban right-of-way to Valparaiso, then making their own line to La Crosse. As a result, the Chicago, Terre Hautte, and Southeastern sees a decline in passenger traffic, but is still a major freight route.
    • The PRR K4s, L1s, I1s, and M1s do not have the generator and headlights re-positioned like OTL.
  • 1950s: Bad Moon Rising.
    • After the war, French design Andre Chapelon and his student Argentine Livio Dante Porta created a series of 4-6-0s, 4-6-4s, 4-8-4s, 2-8-4s, and 2-10-4s for French railroads. They soon join forces with Lima to create a series of truly modern, efficient steam engines that could compete with diesels.
    • Transport America is passed as described by @TheMann
    • The SP finally builds the proposed LA- Vegas line from the 30s.
    • The Union Pacific works with Lima, Andre Chapelon and Livio Dante Prota to create the Ultra 800s, the final word in Union Pacific steam. It is basically a fusion of the FEF-3s, Andre Chapelon's 4-8-4s (built after the war ITTL), with a double belpaire firebox and Porta's idea like the Gas Combustion System, plus caprotti valve gear. One example, 884, supplements the famous 844 on special excursions later on.
  • 1960s: Problems and Solution
    • ALCO survives the way @TheMann envisioned it.
    • Railroad preservation groups spring up across the nation as many smaller steam engines and older rolling stock are retired. In the end, preservation is more and more on par with Britain.
    • In the popularity of roads, railroads decide to start investing where their greatest advantage over cars is: long distance travel.
    • The railroads also point to the disadvantages of air travel to further help better themselves.
    • The last steam engines, which are mainly in the northeast of the country, are retired by 1972.
    • Far more steam locomotives, whether they be extinct or never built in the first place IOTL, are still around ITTL. Including New Haven I-5s, PRR Duplexes, B&O EM-1s, ATSF 4000 Mikados, MILW Atlantics and Hudsons, SP Mountains, DL&W/B&O Poconos (called Lackawannas by the B&O), C&O T1s and the fictional J-4s, IC 2600s, more PRR K4s, L1s, I1s, and M1s, ACL 4-8-4s, L&N 2-8-4s, RF&P Steamers, NYC Hudsons and Niagaras, you name it.
  • 1970s: Railroad's darkest period
    • Many shorter distance passenger routes are dropped so railroads can focus on longer routes. Amtrak is created to serve as a mouthpiece for the roads when asking for government support.
    • Many railroads also have to downgrade their long-distance routes in the process.
    • Many railroads have to put up with old equipment. Some even still dating from the end of steam ITTL's 60s.
    • The Southern begins the steam program of TTL. Which in addition to many stars of OTL also include three fictional steamers of theirs, all based out of Spencer, NC
      • Ms-3 Mountain 2461 (one of the FEC designed engines)
      • Vs-1 "Crescent" 4-8-4 2609 (built do similar design of SP GS-2, but with square cab.
      • Us-1 "Piedmont" 2-8-4 2716 (replaces the C&O engine of OTL)
    • At this time, the government forms TTL's version Amtrak. Which in theory is meant to be take over passenger rail from the companies. However, many roads, particularly the Santa Fe, NYC, and Southern are unsure about this. As a result, Amtrak instead decides to work on making trains that run over numerous railroads, and serving as a mouthpiece for the roads to get government funding.
      • That said, the railroads do begin co-operating with each other and various state governments to provide regional services. Following this, they decide to join in an d support Amtrak.
    • The Auto train begins its first service between Lorton, VA and Sanford, FL. This is followed by another route linking Joliet, IL to Phoenix, AZ.
  • 1980s: The end of Steam, re-emergence, and the spread of Bullet train.
    • Reagan's deregulation policies allow for better railroad operations. What certainly help is that more people begin to see the disadvantages of air travel. Something even more solidified 2 decades later.
    • The PRR and New Haven work on a high speed train to rival Japan's Sinkhansen from DC to Boston. This train, called The Colonial, is a success, and the PRR shortly after starts work on upgrading the line to Pittsburgh.
    • In response to the PRR's Success, the NYC also makes their own HSR train. The Emperor: a New York- Albany- Buffalo- Toronto service run jointly with Canadian Pacific.
    • The PRR responds to the NYC's swift action with similar upgrades on their lines to Pittsburgh, then Cleveland to Columbus. Their ulitmate plan being to beat the NYC to St. Louis, and establish itself as a solid competitor.
    • Rail preservation groups begin getting the chance to operate their steamers on excursions.
  • 1990s: A good time
    • Most railroads operate both passenger and freight trains at a minimum of 100 mph at this point.
    • The railroads begin reintroducing many routes they had abandoned in the 70s during the focus on long distance travel.
    • In celeberatuion of its sesquicentennial, the PRR begins a steam program using a variety of PRR and N&W steamers like a few T1s, the fictional R3 4-8-4s, numerous K4s, an I1 or two, and a few M1s, plus N&W 611 and 1218.
    • The PRR/NH works with the B&M to expand the NE Corridor to Portland, ME. Then likewise works with the RF&P, now under join ownership of the ACL and IC but having semi-independent management. The RF&P agrees to help expand the service to Norfolk.
    • Amtrak begins work on plans to co-operate with other railroads to expand the HSR network.
    • The Atlantic Coast Line renames their Chicago- Florida flagship Dixie Limited to the Floridian.
    • After the success of their Emperor New York-Toronto route, the NYC proceeds to build several lines radiating out of Chicago to Cleveland, Cincinnati, and Detroit. With the former two having another line via Columbus, the NYC makes mods to the Cleveland- Buffalo route.
  • 2000s: Solidification of Railroad presence
    • 9/11 solidifies public pro-rail beliefs among the Urban American populists, and solidifies it as the preferred alternative to the automobile. Which ironically leads to airlines beginning to rely on railroads to provide domestic traffic.
    • The NYC upgrades the Cleveland-Buffalo route in 2002 to make itself the first all 125-mph rail network in America. They also work with the Baltimore and Ohio to introduce the Columbia Limited. Which runs on B&O from Washington to Cleveland, where the NYC takes it the rest of the way to Chicago.
    • The PRR responds to the NYC's progress with extending their high-speed services from Columbus to Cincinnati, St. Louis, and Chicago via a new line to Lima and Ft. Wayne.
    • The Southern Pacific upgrades both their LA- Bay Area lines in the San Joaquin Valley and on the coast. Plus the line to San Diego and finally building their long-proposed line to Las Vegas.
    • While not as keen on the idea, the state of Texas works with the ATSF and SP to operate HSR there. The ATSF runs trains from San Antonio/Houston to the junction at Temple, on the FWD then Oklahoma City, and Tulsa via the former Frisco. The SP then runs trains from El Paso to New Orleans through San Antonio and Houston.
    • Ross rowland's ACE 3000 series of steam engines comes to be. With the UP, PRR, C&O, and MoPac being the major buyers.
    • The western halg of the Midwest has the following high-speed services as the predominant operations...
      • Illinois Central Green Diamond: Chicago- Springfield- St. Louis
      • Milwaukee Road Hiawatha: Chicago- Milwaukee- Madison- Twin Cities
      • SP Omaha Rocket: Chicago- Des Moines- Omaha
      • MoPac Missouri River Eagle: St. Louis- Kansas City- Omaha
  • 2010s: A bright future
    • Railroads begin to try and use battery-operated electric engines. Which despite setbacks become better and better.
    • Almost all passenger trains runs at least 100 mph. Freights move slower. But still quickly enough to be favored over highways by a good deal of people.
    • Most rail lines have at least one major passenger service.
    • Many regularly scheduled tourist trains travel certain rail lines in the nation. As do many new Auto-Train services.
    • The Southern announces the new Brightline trains for use on the former FEC from Miami to Jacksonville.
    • Despite the rest of the Southeast being more hesitant than Texas, they agree when all three of the roads down there work together on new lines. The IC upgrades the former SAL between Richmond and Florida. The ACL work with them on upgrading the New Orleans- Jacksonsville Gulf Coast route. Lastly, the Southern upgrade the Crescent, and running it on a New Orleans- Birmingham- Atlanta- Charlotte- Raleigh service, which it turns over with to the IC at Raleigh for the rest of the way to Richmond and DC. The Southern also operates regional services in North Carolina (Raleigh- Winston-Salem), and in Georgia (Atlanta- Macon- Jacksonville, with a branch on the IC's ex-CofG to Savannah).
    • Pretty much all HSR operations are supplemented by passenger trains operated independently by their railroads. Like the Southern Crescents, ATSF Chiefs, NYC Limiteds, ACL trains, you name it.
In general, the 2018 of my TL would at this point have plenty for the rail enthusiast, believer in improved infrastructure, and commuter in a tizzy of joy.
 
Last edited:
Liveries of the Railroads of my TL: Will be revised periodically

Santa Fe
  • Passenger Warbonnet: Red and silver
  • Blue Goose (Chicago- Denver train): Warbonnet, but with colors of Hudson 3460
  • Freight: OTL Blue and yellow Bluebonnet
  • Florida Special (joint service with Southern): SLSF passenger livery of OTL
New York Central
  • Passenger: Lightning Stripe
  • Freight: Cigar stripe livery
Southern
  • Standard Passenger: OTL's livery
  • Standard Freight: OTL's freight Livery
  • Crescent: Two-tone green of original train
  • Brightline: OTL's Florida East Coast livery
Atlantic Coast Line
  • Passenger: Purple and silver
  • Freight: Black with yellow lining
  • Nashville: Blue and cream of L&N
Southern Pacific
  • Standard Passenger: Daylight Livery
  • Golden State livery: Same as OTL of red and silver
  • Mixed: Black Widow livery
  • Freight: Bloody Nose livery
  • Rocket passenger trains: Red and silver of the Rock Island
Illinois Central
  • Passenger: Chocolate and orange
  • Freight: Green and Yellow
  • Orange Blossom Special: Passenger livery of Seaboard Air Line
  • Green Diamond: Two-tone Green of original trainset.
Union Pacific
  • Standard: Yellow, gray, and green
  • 400 trains in midwest: C&NW livery of OTL
  • Southern Belle: KCS livery of OTL
    • ITTL, the ATSF built their own line to New Orleans From Oakdale, LA. Allowing the UP to get the whole Louisiana and Arkansas.
Pennsylvania
  • Passenger: Maroon
  • Freight: Brunswick Green
Erie
  • Passenger: Wabash Livery
  • Freight: Erie Livery
Baltimore and Ohio
  • Standard Passenger: Same as OTL
  • Mixed traffic: DL&W gray and yellow livery of OTL
  • Freight: Reading scheme of OTL
Chesapeake and Ohio
  • Standard Livery: Same as OTL
  • Freight: Lehigh Valley Red Livery
  • Nickel Plate Limited: NKP passenger livery of OTL
MoPac: Most diverse variety of liveries
Note: All have the company's name written in the style of the Rio Grande name, think SP liveries with Rio Grande style lettering, but "Missouri" instead of "Southern." Though the MoPac logo is on fronts of all engines.
  • Eagle trains Livery: Blue and silver of OTL
  • California Zephyr Livery: CB&Q passenger livery of OTL
  • Mixed traffic: Western Pacific livery
  • Narrow Gauge Diesels: Rio Grande bumblebee livery
  • Standard Freight: Plain blue and white of OTL
New Haven
  • Passenger: Orange, Black, and white of OTL
  • Freight: yellow and black
Boston and Maine
  • Passenger: Red and yellow livery
  • Freight: Later blue and black livery
Milwaukee Road
  • Passenger: paint scheme of Orange, Maroon, and silver of OTL Hiawatha
  • Freight: Just orange, maroon, and black
Great Northern
  • Passenger: GN livery of OTL
  • North Coast Limited: NP livery of OTL
  • Freight livery: NP Freight Livery of OTL
 
A lot of good coming out of your ideas there. :)

The use of steam on coal-hauler roads is logical and I like many of the design ideas (NYC and PRR duplexes in particular are great ideas for their flagship trains) though priority number one would have to be reducing maintenance costs. Chapelon and Porta would handle the power problem though, and I can only imagine what a Porta-designed NYC duplex could do with the 20th Century Limited. (The NYC would also have the advantage there of being able to have the big flagship carry more cars for more amenities, passengers or both.) Big steamers on many of these roads would be best allied with diesels, but as most diesels in North America use electro-pneumatic systems for multiple-unit control, its not difficult to see it possible for a steam locomotive to be able to control diesels by wiring the throttle on the steam engine to provide the right information to diesels behind it.

I can see passenger trains of 125 mph (though do bear in mind you need hella good track to travel at that speed), but trying to run a heavy freight over tracks at that speed will hammer them to pieces. More to the point its not necessary, as air freight is expensive and you don't need speeds that fast to dust trucking companies. If regular flat-terrain speeds for containers/trailers/high-priority freight trains is 90-95 mph you've still got the trucks easily covered, and that way you massively reduce the amount of locomotive power needed. You also don't have to worry so much about rural crossings and impacts too, both for the safety of your cargo and your crews. At that speed, though, you may wish to stick to three-man or even four-man crews for safety reasons.
 
Top