Get used to it baby... Holy fuck the Socialist's actually won a state in the election.
Get used to it baby... Holy fuck the Socialist's actually won a state in the election.
Yep.Of course Vargas would still end up as leader via a coup even in this ATL. Brazil is still a monarchy TTL right?
Lopes's picture appears to be cut off at the bottom.
It's just a smaller picture. It's really annoyingLopes's picture appears to be cut off at the bottom.
Hmmm... sooort of... I think what I've been trying to do is create the conditions (in the British Empire, Latin America and the US) for the conditions of late-Gilded Age/Edwardian politics to stagger on. So when you talk about "leftist" parties TTL you're kind of talking about OTL late-Victorian radical/progressive parties rather than the kind of class-based socialist parties that emerged at this time OTL. That might sound like a distinction in search of a difference but, to give an example, remember that GB and Ireland don't have universal suffrage by this time. So the big international divide now is between the "democratic" societies like the US, Argentina and the British Empire (by a given definition, of course - Britain is still a colonial empire, the US still has Jim Crow and Argentina isn't a great place to be if you're a Native American) and the autocratic monarchical ones like Germany, France, Brazil and Japan.So, we have leftist-dominated world in 1930-s(progressive Republicans and liberal Democrats in the USA, Progressives in Canada, SRs in Russia, Social Democrats in the UK, Cooperatives in Ireland)?
tukhachevsky wasn't a neopagan at all, there's very little actual proof that the story was even told by de gaulle. it's full of logical inconsistencies and de gaulle may have very well not said itOh yes, his (alleged) neopaganism will not be left unused this time
i mean....ustryalov was a fairly minor liberal-conservative with nationalistic tendencies pre-revolution, though he could very well like tukh, i doubt he'd be completely involved in the governmentRealized something: Tukhachevsky's Russia is a pastiche of Chiang's KMT, complete with a puppet civilian President as the Lin Sen equivalent. And speaking of Tukh's Russia, does Nikolai Ustryalov play any role in his regime?
Yes, the idea was to swap OTL China and Russia and give them their own characteristics. I think it's still reasonably interesting though.Realized something: Tukhachevsky's Russia is a pastiche of Chiang's KMT, complete with a puppet civilian President as the Lin Sen equivalent. And speaking of Tukh's Russia, does Nikolai Ustryalov play any role in his regime?
On the veracity of his no-paganism, I understand the general skepticism of De Gaulle's and Roure's account, I think it's a really fascinating idea which I wanted to explore a bit so, for the purposes of this TL, it's true.tukhachevsky wasn't a neopagan at all, there's very little actual proof that the story was even told by de gaulle. it's full of logical inconsistencies and de gaulle may have very well not said it
moreover he had little interest in actually ruling russia, he flat-out refused to coup the government, though the pod might be far away enough