Well on that one you can even get hints what were some of the base photos used. But if you want to get a little creative...oh icic, so the pic on your other tl's also made by AI?
They're both very cool indeed
Well on that one you can even get hints what were some of the base photos used. But if you want to get a little creative...oh icic, so the pic on your other tl's also made by AI?
They're both very cool indeed
They have not refortified the entirety of Ancient Piraeus... at the moment.By the way, there seems to have been a development that we haven't commented on yet. Before Theodore captured Attica, it seems that Patras or Cornith served at the administrative center of Lascarid Greece. However, after the fall of Acropolis, Andrianne moved there at the ducal palace. The baptism of Alexandros II also took place there. Soon, the lascarid administration will be too big to be housed in a small fort on the Acropolis. I expect they will build a new palace in Athens in the not so distant future.
Here is how medieval Acropolis looked like:
Then we got Philanthropenos and Theodore rebuilding the walls of Piraeus. The Conon Walls of Piraeus will be a significant undertaking. We are talking about 13km of fortifications, in addition to a citadel at Kastella hill. Such project will cost at least as much as the fortifications of Messina, with only the fortification of Syracuse being grander in scale. At that time, Piraeus - or Porto Leone as was known to the Italian merchants, was perhaps no bigger than a village.
It seems that Lascarid Greece has a new capital and its name is Athens and a new naval base is being developed in Piraeus.
Edit: Conon's Walls and the ancient city
But tbf if they build the walls as the pic suggests it'd still be a very hard to crack but, especially if they just fortify the entire peninsula instead and make it hard for anyone to crawl up the walls.They have not refortified the entirety of Ancient Piraeus... at the moment.
I mostly agree, but rather than a Thalassocracy, IMO, the Despotat appears to be a mixed one. A characteristic that only would be more manifest as the time would pass and/or the its controlled territories would increase. Cause, the key for the Vatatzés, success, until now is that they were/are able to balance both the Land side, with their key material and manpower resources and the Sea side, with their fleet key to protect and keep open the Despotat sea lanes between Greece and Sicily/Italy.Except the Despotate is essentially a sea power and Thessaloniki is too much off-center relative to the Syracuse-Athens axis which is the center of gravity of the despotate, Syracuse for the Ionian sea and Athens for the Aegean. Even Constantinople is too far on the fringe of Lascarid realm... for the time being.
A recurring feature in their campaigns, since the conquest of Achaea in the early 1300s has always been their ability to quickly shift manpower and resources between Sicily and Greece, to achieve local superiority.I mostly agree, but rather than a Thalassocracy, IMO, the Despotat appears to be a mixed one. A characteristic that only would be more manifest as the time would pass and/or the its controlled territories would increase. Cause, the key for the Vatatzés, success, until now is that they were/are able to balance both the Land side, with their key material and manpower resources and the Sea side, with their fleet key to protect and keep open the Despotat sea lanes between Greece and Sicily/Italy.
I do think the Vatatzes' greatest strength is them being able to move swiftly against their enemies, and I think this will be no exception. I think if the Vatatzes wants to pivot to retake the rest of the ERE (and Western Anatolia) they need to shift their focus on the Balkans (with Sicily being one of the regions that will be conquered ) and moving to Thessaloniki when the time comes would be a choice that I think will be a smart move until they get to constantinople.A recurring feature in their campaigns, since the conquest of Achaea in the early 1300s has always been their ability to quickly shift manpower and resources between Sicily and Greece, to achieve local superiority.
When Frederick invaded and besieged Syracuse, Theodore stripped Achaea, leaving the Hospitalers behind, to crush the royal fleet outside Syracuse, and conversely now, Ioannis has sent considerable forces to speed up the conquest of Phocis and Thessaly...
Without their control of the Ionian sea in between and secure lines of communications, none of their big successes would have been possible I posit, hence my thinking of their fleet being even more crucial to their success than their land forces.
I do think the smartest thing the Vatatzes could do is be an early adopter of guns. While I think cannon won't be that widespread during this period (its still the early days of gunpowder warfare) I think if the Vatatzes put them on boats they're basically going to have unparalleled strike capability against coastal cites like Palmero, Arta and Thessaloniki, and be really good at besieging islands. It was around 1340s where these weapons became more widespread too, and putting them on ships would make sense. After all, the first documented use of cannonry on ship was in 1338 and if a navally inclined admiral of the Vatatzes was present to put them on ships it'd be something that would allow them to pull ahead of their rivals.While we speak of it, I'd say the centralization policies of the Despotate and a helfty dose of administrative and bureaucratic practices inherited from Nicaea and Byzantine empires is another key to it. From it came the ability to collect taxes on a regular, coherent basis, which allowed a sound and stable enough financial footing that only could enable a standing army and fleet and in the long run, success provided compitent leadership, which they had; that is essential because, relative to their population and economy, I believe that enabled them to leverage a higher revenue on a longer time basis without compromising the socio-political bases of their domains.
Granted, I'm basing essentially off a parallel and analogy with the transition from feudal to centralized state under the Capetians in France during later stages of the HYW and the particular corollary between the evolution of fiscality and the advent of artillery and proper standing, professional militaries, but I believe that this can hold some truth to our case ITTL.
@Lascaris , speaking of artillery too, and siege warfare too, what's their status in the Despotate's armies?
- Cannons were still at a primitive stage around this time ITTL, but since they appeared in the late 1320s England, I suppose they must be known in some way in the eastern Mediterranean. And the strong politico-economic dynamics of the Despotate allow for not insignificant development and experiment of this technology.
- And with the various sieges across Greece, how has Philantropenos shaped his and the Lascarids' doctrine of poliorcetics, especially given the legacy of Byzantine art of warfare?
- Is Greek fire secret dead and burried for good, or is its death fresh enough someone in Vatatzes employment to rediscover it?
This is why I think a major target for the Despotate will be Corfu. Possession of the island is vital to ensure communication between the two halfs of the Despotate. A direct crossing of the Ionian Sea was perilous in the vase majority of cases, the ships had to hug the coastline. Wind systems of both halves of the Mediterranean converge in the area, so Corfu as a safe haven was of paramount importance.Cause, the key for the Vatatzés, success, until now is that they were/are able to balance both the Land side, with their key material and manpower resources and the Sea side, with their fleet key to protect and keep open the Despotat sea lanes between Greece and Sicily/Italy.
Well I could see the Angevin do it post anarchy bc otherwise the situation would be very hard for the Vatatzes to navigate.This is why I think a major target for the Despotate will be Corfu. Possession of the island is vital to ensure communication between the two halfs of the Despotate. A direct crossing of the Ionian Sea was perilous in the vase majority of cases, the ships had to hug the coastline. Wind systems of both halves of the Mediterranean converge in the area, so Corfu as a safe haven was of paramount importance.
Yeah I do think it'd be good for the Vatatzes to do something like that, but when the Anjou dyansty dies the Spanish and French probably will move in, and there is the question of if the Vatatzes should just take over and hold it as a third party (with garauntees against moving against the Pope). I could see it happening especially if France is any ally of the Vatatzes.Overall, it seems that Hungary could be a natural ally for the Despotate. They will be a major opponent to both Dusan and Venice. It will be difficult for them to control Naples for any long period of time. Better to have anarchy in Naples with weak control of the monarch, with the barons running wild. After all, there is the successful example of frederickian Sicily.
It is very much still under the ERE though, and I'm not sure if the Vatatzes holds it or not. There is a possibility that the island is besiged when the Vatatzes fought the ERE, and with the navy being non-existent during the era I think they could do it. There just has been no indication of who is ruling them right now.By the way, at this point Monemvasia could have become a major commercial power. In OTL the Monemvasiots had founded mercantile colonies in Constantinople, Pegae and Heraclea and they were very active in the trade of staples from Thrace but also Macedonia. I would expect that Thedore will do his best for his subjects to maintain the commercial privileges that Andronikos II had bestowed. The Monemvasiots have now a many more commercial opportunities from Syracuse to Thasos. I can see the latter becoming an entrepot for the Serres, Christopolis and Evros valley trade.
Very interesting!This is why I think a major target for the Despotate will be Corfu. Possession of the island is vital to ensure communication between the two halfs of the Despotate. A direct crossing of the Ionian Sea was perilous in the vase majority of cases, the ships had to hug the coastline. Wind systems of both halves of the Mediterranean converge in the area, so Corfu as a safe haven was of paramount importance.
Corfu is fiercely coveted by the Venetians. In 1348, when Louis the Great invaded Naples, the Venetians tried to purchase the island. They also tried other methods, like dispatching officers of their fleet to negotiate directly with a group of anti-Angevin Corfiot nobles. Suffice to say, that Corfu under the control of a strong maritime power is a nightmare for the Despotate, that as you mentioned depends on maritime communications to fend off powerful enemies. It is worth noting that Corfu belonged to the Taranto branch.
Overall, it seems that Hungary could be a natural ally for the Despotate. They will be a major opponent to both Dusan and Venice. It will be difficult for them to control Naples for any long period of time. Better to have anarchy in Naples with weak control of the monarch, with the barons running wild. After all, there is the successful example of frederickian Sicily.
By the way, at this point Monemvasia could have become a major commercial power. In OTL the Monemvasiots had founded mercantile colonies in Constantinople, Pegae and Heraclea and they were very active in the trade of staples from Thrace but also Macedonia. I would expect that Thedore will do his best for his subjects to maintain the commercial privileges that Andronikos II had bestowed. The Monemvasiots have now a many more commercial opportunities from Syracuse to Thasos. I can see the latter becoming an entrepot for the Serres, Christopolis and Evros valley trade.
Monemvasia at the time would have been larger than the late palaiologan era. The whole acropolis was occupied, while the lower city was much more extensive than the current walled one, covering all the south side of the island up to the port at the bridge connecting Monemvasia to the mainland. It has been estimated that the 13th century population of the city stood at 20,000 people. The Monemvasiots maintained subsidiary harbors at Kochylas, Gerakas, Agios Pavlos and Old Monemvasia. It seems also that the city's hinterland was rather extensive. At the very least, the Monemvasiots controlled the area up to Molaoi. The city influence the eastern seabord of the Peloponnese as north as Kastanitsa. However, I don't know how strong that influence was, since it seems that the leading families were holdings pronoias closer to the city (Molaoi, Neapoli etc).
It is also important to notice that the leading aristocratic families of the city (Mamonas, Daimonoiannis and Sophianos) have been described as being captains and merchants. Basically, they look very much like the patrician families of the italian mercantile cities.
Where am I getting at ? Let me make a comparison with 1330s Ragusa that had a similar population (although with its hinterland, I think Monemvasia was a bit larger).
View attachment 870729
View attachment 870730
View attachment 870731
At this point Monemvasia should be a second tier mercantile power in the same league as Ragusa. Or even better, not Monemvasia per se, but the Monemvasiots. I expect mercantile colonies/quarters of them in Glarentza, Patras, Corinth, Demetrias. Halmyros, Thebes, (or at least its export port at Livadostrata), Thasos, Chios and potentially at Sicily and Calabria as well. Now let's add Messina. Even under Frederick it was a prosperous commercial town. However now its economic ties with Calabria are not severed as in OTL and they have a ruler that promotes ship building, industry and commerce. Then we get Chios that can provide up to 24 galleys. If we add all three together, alongside the standing fleet of the Despot... we get a Tier 1 naval power.
The data on Monemvasia I found in this PhD thesis and the charts for Ragusa are from this article.Where have you found the data?
Thank you!The data on Monemvasia I found in this PhD thesis and the charts for Ragusa are from this article.
Thessaly is such a valuable addition to the Despotate. The Ottomans could procure 3,000 sipahi cavalry from the Sanjak of Trikala, that also included the Spercheios Valley.Now it was time for Theodore to restore the peace...
The islands will be easier to reform since there were not many powerful nobles there. The biggest landowners were monasteries.And Ioannis had enough of a political mind not to try reforming the whole lot in a single step. This year it would be Gallipoli. Next year some other province. It would likely take years to reform the entirety of Thrace, much less Macedonia a piece at a time. But it was the only way to tackle the task.
Malta is a very valuable addition to the Despotate. It was a source of cotton and sugar, even though the available land for such crops was much smaller than that of Sicily.But the treaty said nothing about Malta. Thus as soon as Philanthropenos was back in Sicily he had been joined by forty more galleys and sailed south...
It's nice to see Ioannis instituting a program of centralization actually picking up within the empire, instead of in newly acquired territories, especially beginning in Gallipoli, which has roughly 20 years before the earthquake hits it...And Ioannis had enough of a political mind not to try reforming the whole lot in a single step. This year it would be Gallipoli. Next year some other province. It would likely take years to reform the entirety of Thrace, much less Macedonia a piece at a time.
A Roman Army led by Andronikos III almost twice as large (5k vs. 3k) than its OTL counterpart, leading to a peace deal much better than OTL (Anything is better than territorial concessions in my opinion)! A solid peace, if it holds, on the Empire's Northern border will be nice if Andronikos/Ioannis do not need to detour Umur (or their own soldiers, if things go well?) north to deal with the Bulgarians in the 1340s.The empire would get back Anchialos in exchange for Yambol and Ivan Alexander's son Michael would be married to Andronikos daughter Irene. Surprisingly enough peace between the two sides would hold out for quite a while...
Tbh I think Malta's main value is that if the Lascarids hold it it removes a potential staging point from which others could attack Sicily from the southThessaly is such a valuable addition to the Despotate. The Ottomans could procure 3,000 sipahi cavalry from the Sanjak of Trikala, that also included the Spercheios Valley.
And that brings us to ... Trikala, held by a certain back-stabbing Orsini. This kinslayer of a despot has already betrayed the Lascarids once and has now snatched a corner of Thessaly, while Theodore fought a long and bloody war for it.
Orsini cannot hope to compete with the Lascarids in Thessaly. Or Arta in general. After Orsini got murdered, Andronikos was able to easily subjugate Epirus. Considering his OTL field army rarely reached or exceeded 4,000 men, that says a lot.
The islands will be easier to reform since there were not many powerful nobles there. The biggest landowners were monasteries.
Malta is a very valuable addition to the Despotate. It was a source of cotton and sugar, even though the available land for such crops was much smaller than that of Sicily.
That and the control of both entry points into the eastern Mediterranean from the western Mediterranean. Of course, the Otranto strait are not theirs.... Yet.Tbh I think Malta's main value is that if the Lascarids hold it it removes a potential staging point from which others could attack Sicily from the south
Indeed!That and the control of both entry points into the eastern Mediterranean from the western Mediterranean. Of course, the Otranto strait are not theirs.... Yet.
I wonder how many of the unemployed sailors found their way to Messina and Syracuse. There is after all the example of Alexandros attracting part of the demobilized byzantine crews back in the 1280s.It was not that Frederick's position had much improved, apparently this year he had been forced to lay up over half his galley fleet lacking the money to pay their crews.