He was doing it in hopes of having allies. If the Angevins are partisans of the pope, then I must be the opposite.Well I meant Frederick III, the son of Peter of Aragon.
He was doing it in hopes of having allies. If the Angevins are partisans of the pope, then I must be the opposite.Well I meant Frederick III, the son of Peter of Aragon.
Firstly, I think it is more likely that the Lascarids would become allies with the Hungarians over Serbia, which would be a menace for quite some time, and the main problem with the Vatatzes/Lascarids going for Naples is that they're going for broke: both branches of the Angevins don't want Lascarid rule over the kingdom. They would also have to contend with Hungary (which would be beatable, but remember he has the rest of Naples to deal with, which would be hard), and unforeseen consequences like a second Catalan invasion (or even a Venetian intervention even though it is unlikely) could occur. The other major problem is that the Vatatzes, even if they used the opportunity to chase the nobles out, would have to rule the reigon as feudal lords beyond their own domains as wiping all the feudal nobles out all at once would cause more problems than it would fix.Same anarchy will likely happen here too unless you made the next generation of Angevins different from OTL’s or if Robert decided to marry Joanna to young Alexandros. The Hungarian Angevins failed essentially because they were too far from their own power base. They can’t stay there permanently if they wanted to run Hungary. This is not something that would be a problem here, given Ioannes will be in Italy 24/7 and his brother is in Greece to run things there on his behalf. They were also exceedingly cruel because Louis’ army largely consisted of foreign mercs he couldn’t pay without looting the place. Depending on whether the Lascarids implement Lascarid policy to the rest of the kingdom, they could uproot Angevin support permanently by shifting the power of the nobility to the underclasses instead. The post-Robert anarchy would be an ideal time to do it given a lot of the nobility would be purged by Louis the Great. It’s the type of policy that has universal appeal. By this point in time, the Lascarids aren’t exactly foreigners to the local populace of Southern Italy either.
tbf I think the opportunity for the Angevins to take out the Vatatzes are growing weaker and weaker as the Vatatzes expands in the Balkans, especially as they take back more of former ERE land. tbf the time between then and Robert's death (assuming the Vatatzes takes over Thessaly and kicks Alfonso out, while John of Gravina doesn't take Epirus except Cephalonia) the Vatatzes would have had ample time to digest their conquests. By 1343 they should be ready to push for further expansion.I agree,but once Robert croaks, an opportunity will open up in Southern Italy. It’s a matter of self-preservation when it comes to dealing with the Angevins too. If you don’t eliminate them now, they will try to eliminate you in the future.
Firstly, I think it is more likely that the Lascarids would become allies with the Hungarians over Serbia, which was a menace for quite some time, and the main problem with the Vatatzes/Lascarids going for Naples is that they're going for broke: both branches of the Angevins don't want Lascarid rule over the kingdom. They would also have to contend with Hungary (which would be beatable, but remember he has the rest of Naples to deal with, which would be hard), and unforeseen consequences like a second Catalan invasion (or even a Venetian intervention even though it is unlikely) could occur. The other major problem is that the Vatatzes, even if they used the opportunity to chase the nobles out, would have to rule the reigon as feudal lords beyond their own domains as wiping all the feudal nobles out all at once would cause more problems than it would fix.Same anarchy will likely happen here too unless you made the next generation of Angevins different from OTL’s or if Robert decided to marry Joanna to young Alexandros. The Hungarian Angevins failed essentially because they were too far from their own power base. They can’t stay there permanently if they wanted to run Hungary. This is not something that would be a problem here, given Ioannes will be in Italy 24/7 and his brother is in Greece to run things there on his behalf. They were also exceedingly cruel because Louis’ army largely consisted of foreign mercs he couldn’t pay without looting the place. Depending on whether the Lascarids implement Lascarid policy to the rest of the kingdom, they could uproot Angevin support permanently by shifting the power of the nobility to the underclasses instead. The post-Robert anarchy would be an ideal time to do it given a lot of the nobility would be purged by Louis the Great. It’s the type of policy that has universal appeal. By this point in time, the Lascarids aren’t exactly foreigners to the local populace of Southern Italy either.
tbf I think the opportunity for the Angevins to take out the Vatatzes are growing weaker and weaker as the Vatatzes expands in the Balkans, especially as they take back more of former ERE land. tbf the time between then and Robert's death (assuming the Vatatzes takes over Thessaly and kicks Alfonso out, while John of Gravina doesn't take Epirus except Cephalonia) the Vatatzes would have had ample time to digest their conquests. By 1343 they should be ready to push for further expansion.I agree,but once Robert croaks, an opportunity will open up in Southern Italy. It’s a matter of self-preservation when it comes to dealing with the Angevins too. If you don’t eliminate them now, they will try to eliminate you in the future.
tbf them not moving at all after robert dies does seem weird though. Minor expansions to take more of Calabria while killing Frederick off without giving said lands to Joanna would be something I see them doing though, and between 1343 and 1350 I see the Hungarians just telling the Vatatzes to not interfere and they'd mostly just sit out the conflict.Then it is the matter of how Ioannis and Theodore view themselves. I would argue they see themselves more as Byzantine/Roman princes than the heirs of the Hohenstaufen. If it was not the case, they would have alligned with the Ghibellines of the north like Frederick and continue the ghibelline cause. Theodore's marriage with Adrianne and his friendship with Andronikos III, reinforces their focus to the Balkans. Overall, they seem a pragmatic family - at least for now- prefering to expand where there is a power gap. Their expansion in Sicily is a vendetta against the man who betrayed and (possibly) arranged the murder of their father.
Yeah, the Vatatzes is in a very enviable position by that point in time. I wonder how would Robert attempt to get the Vatatzes under his daughter's control before his death.Indeed! The Lascarids need to survive the 1334-1343 decade and then they will be in a very good spot. The Neapolitican Succession was a clusterfuck and the Durrazo and Taranto branches of the Angevins were overly ambitious, with each branch having its own agenda. At 1343 the Angevin threat is basically neutralized and Ioannis will be in an enviable position. After all, he will control the second biggest army in Italy.
I don't see Alfonso ruling the Duchy of Athens for much longer. The numbers and the commanders/training the Vatatzes can afford would crush him.Ioannis won't be needing his Sicilians for the foreseeable future. The Emperor will be in Italy until 1330. Then John of Bohemia will descend, capturing Brescia in 1330 and by 1331 controlling most of Lombardy. Pope John XXII was willing to recognize John as the King of Lombardy and Philip VI as the King of Arles - something very dangerous for the Angevins. That development will be solved only in June 1333. Therefore, the Angevin threat will be thorouhgly neutralized for the next 6 years.
Firstly, I think it is more likely that the Lascarids would become allies with the Hungarians over Serbia, which was a menace for quite some time, and the main problem with the Vatatzes/Lascarids going for Naples is that they're going for broke: both branches of the Angevins don't want Lascarid rule over the kingdom. They would also have to contend with Hungary (which would be beatable, but remember he has the rest of Naples to deal with, which would be hard),
I do agree that its a good time for the Vatatzes to act, although I'd think they'd have to act cautiously. The Durazzos and Taranto families were strong forces in the Kingdom and would act against the Vatatzes too, and the Vatatzes (if they were to take the reins of the kingdom) will not be able to run the nation similar to the other realms they currently control, which would only make administration of the realm more difficult (as doing so would cause outcry).
You mean a second Aragonese invasion? That I see it potentially happening.and unforeseen consequences like a second Catalan invasion (or even a Venetian intervention even though it is unlikely) could occur.
It’s what they have been doing all the time though.The other major problem is that the Vatatzes, even if they used the opportunity to chase the nobles out, would have to rule the reigon as feudal lords beyond their own domains as wiping all the feudal nobles out all at once would cause more problems than it would fix.
If you take that much, may as well finish them off. Leaving them with only Campania and Abruzzo is meaningless. Don’t leave things 90% finished.I just see the Vatatzes securing Calabria and finish Frederick off, and maaaybe attempting to secure Puglia first between Robert's death (Joanna and her allies may allow the Vatatzes taking over Sicily for their loyalty) and Louis leaving Naples, and as things continue to spiral then I could see the Vatatzes maybe going for more gains as claimants of the Kingdom of Sicily.
Realise that even if they takeback the rest of Greece, they would hardly be some kind of great power. Even the ERE under the Komnenians with a much greater domain had trouble dealing with minor powers like Serbia and Cilicia. If the Vatatzes don’t finish the Angevins now, they will probably ally with the Vatatzes‘ opponents in the East and attack them whenever they are distracted.tbf I think the opportunity for the Angevins to take out the Vatatzes are growing weaker and weaker as the Vatatzes expands in the Balkans, especially as they take back more of former ERE land. tbf the time between then and Robert's death (assuming the Vatatzes takes over Thessaly and kicks Alfonso out, while John of Gravina doesn't take Epirus except Cephalonia) the Vatatzes would have had ample time to digest their conquests. By 1343 they should be ready to push for further expansion.
There’s really two choices. Either marry Joanna to young Alexandros so that the two families become one or find as many allies as possible and attack the Vatatzes before they could consolidate Greece. Even if the Vatatzes doesn’t take the throne, they will try to take advantage of Joanna as you mentioned.tbf them not moving at all after robert dies does seem weird though. Minor expansions to take more of Calabria while killing Frederick off without giving said lands to Joanna would be something I see them doing though, and between 1343 and 1350 I see the Hungarians just telling the Vatatzes to not interfere and they'd mostly just sit out the conflict.
Yeah, the Vatatzes is in a very enviable position by that point in time. I wonder how would Robert attempt to get the Vatatzes under his daughter's control before his death.
Athens is gone. The Vatatzes have it.I don't see Alfonso ruling the Duchy of Athens for much longer. The numbers and the commanders/training the Vatatzes can afford would crush him.
PS would we see the Palaeologos-Montferrat doing better against Joanna ittl? it'd be interesting to see them have a different route in history despite John II being basically an Italian noble at this point. We know John II fought against Joanna during the early days of her reign, and a meeting between John and Ioannis would be interesting.
Rather I think the Hungarian branch would be the best thing that happened to the Lascarids. Beyond the fact that Robert dying with no one to replace him, the heads of the house of Durazzos and Tarantos getting killed by the Hungarians means that Puglia has a power vacuum for a while, which the Vatatzes could go in and take Puglia and Basilicata, which would be the best thing they could take outside of the conquest of Naples. Considering that Louis of Hungary never went beyond Aversa I think they would be fine with the Vatatzes, especially since they were in Syracuse, and probably would have had a lot more leeway than usual. I don't think the Tarantos and co could've fought off the Vatatzes for their occupied lands too.Out of the lot, I think the Hungarian branch would be the main problem if things proceeds as otl. Louis the Great almost completely culled the House of Anjou in Naples. The princes were either executed or dragged to Hungary by him. If the Lascarids came in and distributed their land to the underclasses, there’s not much the surviving Angevins could work with. IOTL, only reason Charles III could take power was thanks to the patronage of Louis the Great. That said it’s true that the Hungarians could be useful against the Serbians.
I do wonder if the Louis the Great could be convinced to give up his claim on Naples with a marriage or two and still continue the alliance. After the OTL invasion, he gave up on the kingdom completely.
I think it is possible. It depends on the Aragonese king though, and I really do wonder if they'd do that as the Vatatzes have been shown to be able to put a lot of men on the field.You mean a second Aragonese invasion? That I see it potentially happening.
If you take that much, may as well finish them off. Leaving them with only Campania and Abruzzo is meaningless. Don’t leave things 90% finished.
tbf it depends. It really is more about how the strength of the empire and how good the generals are, as the ERE has lost with armies much bigger than thier enemies...Realise that even if they takeback the rest of Greece, they would hardly be some kind of great power. Even the ERE under the Komnenians with a much greater domain had trouble dealing with minor powers like Serbia and Cilicia. If the Vatatzes don’t finish the Angevins now, they will probably ally with the Vatatzes‘ opponents in the East and attack them whenever they are distracted.
Alfonso is still controls some of thessaly, the Vatatzes aren't done with them yet. Athens itself is taken by the Lascarids ye.Athens is gone. The Vatatzes have it.
Not a good thing when news were reaching Constantinople of the continuing advances both of the Ottomans in Anatolia,
I'd suppose that from the Constantinople point of view, the ideal way to deal with both may be to let do face/fight between them, hoping to neutralize both... Of course, that even leaving aside feasibility matters, it considering the historical/family links from the Laskaris between the Empire's remaining Anatolian subjects. It may not be advisable to even if possible to think of attempting to implement it...to the continuing advances of Theodore Lascaris in Thessaly
I believed, that even if nominally, that the Despotat ruling family, still consider themselves as still belonging to the Empire and that at least de jure they still are imperial subjects. Even, if I'm not mistaken, if they aren't paying any taxes (or at least not any more) to the Empire, neither for their Sicilian lands nor for the just acquired in Greece proper...Theodore was technically an ally.
But the success of Andronikos Asen also meant that by now the despotate of the Two Sicilies directly bordered Angevin holdings in Greece as well as the southern edge of the despotate of Epirus.
Now, I have the foreboding feeling, that Kantakouzenos may try to apply/employ the ancient Roman tactic/policy of 'Divide et Impera' against the Lascaris. And/or using to/joining with either Epirus or even the if less likely, should the opportunity may arise, with any other power like the AngevinsBut one who was starting to become too large for comfort...
Is it fair to assume that these new pronoias are from Phokis and the parts of Phthiotis that were conquered during the previous campaign year?Mobilization orders for the army had already gone out from the previous December with the Sicilian army, now increased by about a thousand more pronoia holders, a quarter of them heavy cavalry the rest infantry, assembling by February for the new campaign.
Kantakouzenos has lived long enough at the Catepanate to know the ability of the Lascarids to utilize the resources of their domain and the relative amplitute of resources at their disposal. A better understanding of lascarid power will certainly influence the imperial policy.Of course Theodore was technically an ally. But one who was starting to become too large for comfort...
Salona, Phokis, April 18th, 1227
Abruzzo could be returned to the Papacy.If you take that much, may as well finish them off. Leaving them with only Campania and Abruzzo is meaningless. Don’t leave things 90% finished.
Hmm where do the Angevin's Greek lands touch the Lascarid's lands?Salona, Phokis, April 18th, 1227
hmm so the civil war is less brutal than otl? Since the last phase ended much earlier than otl (like an entire year earlier) I wonder how would that change things. A stronger Empire is better for Andronikos III, but it is not as good for the Vatatzes/Lascarids, which are using said power vacuum to take more land.Constantinople, May 24th, 1327
Hmm that is good for the Lascarids, pushing to slowly but surely finish Alfonso and kick the Catalans out would be for the best.Neopatras, June 1327
that makes sense for Frederick, and I think he'll prob act like this until he dies lol.Palermo, October 1327
Philantropenos is definitely doing well, and I hope he'll conquer the lands that Alfonso still holds. Even though that'll make Constantinople more uncomfortable of their power, speaking of which:Lamia, April 1328
That's not really that surprising considering the conquest of Morea from the ERE and the conquest of the Duchy of Athens. They must be very popular in Greek circles rn considering they're taking back lands that have been lost to the Latins for a long time in the last few decades, they must have the notoriety Andronikos III would only dream of having despsite being the vassals of the ERE.Constantinople, August 1328
I do think that Andronikos III and John Kantakouzenos probably would still have to show that they're the 'master' of the vassal though, even if they won't dethrone the Vatatzes/Lascarids. Especially when Alexandros II has Palailogos blood in him, and could claim the throne by being the cousin of the next emperor. They are way too dangerous.Then we have Andronikos III (Triple A): Godfather to Theodore's son... who also has just lost a major city in Anatolia, and will have to deal with an aggressive Stefan Dusan soon along with Orhan Ghazi... To put it simply, A3 has bigger fish to fry. OTL A3 did step in when Thessaly and Epirus had crises and subsumed them back into the ERE, but one could argue if that was really the best way to utilize his resources... And those breakaway provinces didn't have the ability to call forth 10K Hellas pronoia either... (not even counting Sicilian pronoia...).
I think they won't unless the Vatatzes attempt to take Euboea, Crete or the Ionian islands, which I could see the Vatatzes attempt to do. I do think they'll do it long after the Serbian Empire dies off though, and Hungary and Serbia would be too strong for Venice to directly act against the Vatatzes.The real question is if the Laskarid expansion in Southern Hellas will influence the Italian Maritime Republics formalization of an alliance with the Serbians ITTL. That might shift the dynamic of the Balkans, although I still don't think that will happen. Venice's fears of Serbian domination won't allow that in my opinion though. And, the other Maritime Republics will have to deal with Robert/Joanna and the HRE Emperors interfering in Italy as well.
tbf considering the armies Stefan Dusan could field they are quite horrific against the Vatatzes, which could probably field armies around the 10,000 mark with the current territories they have, and 20,000 is probably the upper limit the Vatatzes could field. Even if they do pike and shot properly I don't think they could fend off armies much bigger than themselves unless the Serbians split their armies.No, Southern Hellas is firm Laskarid clay until Stefan Dusan decides to step in really, and that gives Theodore & Ioannis roughly two decades to consolidate Thessaly (And Epirus soon?) which should be more than enough time.
I meant legally speaking are the new lands they conquered supposed to be administered as vassals of the Roman Emperor, the Neapolitans or like you said actually independent much like how England was during times when the King of England was vassal to the King of France as Duke of Normandy etc.Athens is rightful Laskarid Clay as of the 1320s.
Robert has bigger fish to fry in Northern Italy, and Joanna will have her hands full in Central/Northern Italy during her reign. Frederick is too weak to project power outside Palermo, let alone Hellas.
Then we have Andronikos III (Triple A): Godfather to Theodore's son... who also has just lost a major city in Anatolia, and will have to deal with an aggressive Stefan Dusan soon along with Orhan Ghazi... To put it simply, A3 has bigger fish to fry. OTL A3 did step in when Thessaly and Epirus had crises and subsumed them back into the ERE, but one could argue if that was really the best way to utilize his resources... And those breakaway provinces didn't have the ability to call forth 10K Hellas pronoia either... (not even counting Sicilian pronoia...).
No, Southern Hellas is firm Laskarid clay until Stefan Dusan decides to step in really, and that gives Theodore & Ioannis roughly two decades to consolidate Thessaly (And Epirus soon?) which should be more than enough time.
The real question is if the Laskarid expansion in Southern Hellas will influence the Italian Maritime Republics formalization of an alliance with the Serbians ITTL. That might shift the dynamic of the Balkans, although I still don't think that will happen. Venice's fears of Serbian domination won't allow that in my opinion though. And, the other Maritime Republics will have to deal with Robert/Joanna and the HRE Emperors interfering in Italy as well.
That could be super interesting. Perhaps an agreement could be made that the ERE's 'claim' on Epirus could be granted to Theodore in exchange for 4-5K pronoia in the defense/reconquest of Bythinia in cooperation with any soldiers Andronikos III can summon forth? That would prolong Byzantine control of NW Anatolia for a time, but Anatolia really deserves the entire attention of the Imperial Throne, not just one campaign. Otherwise the Turkomens will just retreat before the ERE's army and come back when they leave.I would argue that Theodore would help Andronikos the 3rd with the defense on Bithynia. Mainly to prove himself not a threat to the Romans and also to keep his army experienced. Even if the locals love the Laskarids I believe Andronikos is in such a desperate state in Asia Minor that any help would be needed. I mean the Ottomans don't have massive armies and 20 years ago the Catalans were defeating them and now the Catalans are being pushed back by the Vatatzes/Laskaris. An expedition force of 2k-3k would suffice to put an end to Ottoman aggression.
I just don't see an advantage to gaining more of mainland Italy outside more of Calabria or Apulia? I'd rather see Ioannis use Joanna's chaotic reign to convince her that in exchange for the claim to the entirety of Trinacaria and all Angevin claims to Hellas, she will have his neutrality (maybe alliance?). This would give Ioannis and Theodore full reign to take Trapani, Palermo, Malta, the Aeolian Islands and Epirus (John of Gravina I think is here?). With Trinacaria under the thumb of the Vatatzes, that would give them a very secure power-base to build off of for Naples in the future, in my opinion.tbf Avorrange is correct in that Naples is the best region for the Vatatzes to expand into, if only because the kingdom has many players that the Vatatzes could play against and gain more lands with Greeks in them. I could see them conquer Aquila as the Hungarians come through, and I think they'll be less hated than the Hungarians with their mercenaries.
Ah, yeah, I see what you're saying now. I'm not really sure legally speaking, but the Vatatzes seem practically independent right now (realpolitik speaking).I meant legally speaking are the new lands they conquered supposed to be administered as vassals of the Roman Emperor, the Neapolitans or like you said actually independent much like how England was during times when the King of England was vassal to the King of France as Duke of Normandy etc.