Interestingly, though I am Dutch, I had never heard of the Dutch renaming New York as 'New Orange' upon (temporarily, in OTL) regaining it. My understanding that the Dutch always called the city Nieuw Amsterdam, and the colony (including the hinterland) Nieuw-Nederland.
In any case, the notion of a much larger British Guyana is interesting in itself, and might in turn prompt the British to annex French Guyana as well, during some (probably quite inevitable) future conflict with France. The initial revenue produced by Suriname will also initually exceed the profits of owning New York, and by far. The Dutch did not choose to swap the colonies back for no reason: it was the profitable choice at the time. The only reason the British accepted there would be a choice at all was that they had non-economic motives. namely geostrategical ones: annexing Nieuw-Nederland would bring the Mid-Atlantic colonies into direct overland contact with New England, which in turn allowed for a better united front against the true rival: New France. Since it is very hard to envision the Dutch making another choice, perhaps we can posit a scenario wherein some political consideration forces Britain to forego the option of any choice being made? To simply keep Suriname, and let the Dutch keep New York?
To some extent, other factors play a role in this. For instance, what territory was the 'colony swap' really about? The Dutch only held the city of New York, if I remember correctly. Was NYC swapped for Suriname, or would Britain have had to evacuate all of Nieuw-Nederland as well, had the Dutch chosen differently? If the former, I can easily see the British deciding to drop the whole 'choice' aspect and just let the Dutch keep NYC (or 'Nieuw Amsterdam', rather). After all, the hinterland still connects the various British colonies, that Dutch city-state is hardly a bother, and Suriname is wordth way more than the Dutch could ever tax British merchants who would have to go through Dutch Nieuw Amsterdam if they want to trade along the Hudson. But if it's the latter scenario, whereby the British have to surrender all of Nieuw-Nederland... then you'd probably have to come up with some plausible POD to make them prefer Suriname (or care less about connecting their colonies).
Besides, there's a world of difference between "Nieuw-Nederland is Dutch again" and "Nieuw Amsterdam is a Dutch city-state". The former renders Britain weaker against both New France and against the Iroquois (who would now be sitting between the British, the Dutch, the British again, and the French - and could more effectively playthese off against each other). That sort of TL could see a world where New France remains a threat, the British colonies never united, no American revolution occurs, and an independent Iroquois state emerges as a neutral buffer between various colonial powers. Makes me very happy to even think about the possibilities! On the other hand, the "Dutch city-state" approach offers its own perspective, where perhaps an American revolution still occurs, but Nieuw Amsterdam becomes not a part of the (alt-)USA, but an associated free state. A sort of North American Hong Kong.