The Discord That Follows

Your right that Maximilian's survival will not affect the Maygars much. Still it is something that the venerable dynasty can be proud of. Maximilian was very proud of his Habsburg heritage, during a vist to Spain he allegedly came across an engraved Habsburg crest and lamented how much his families influemnce had dwindled through the centuries. Supposedly he viewed the 2nd Mexican Empire as taking responsibility for land formerly under Spinish Habsburgs.

I will be curious to see how he handles succession. He had no children with his Empress and that does not seem likely to change. He adopted two of Augustin Iturbide's descendants intending to use them as heirs, but in the event of success his family might pressure him to either match them with a Habsburg Princess or have a member of the House succeed him.

It would seem your prayers have been answered.

EDIT:
Did you say Mexico is growing? My initial thought was growing in econmic terms and presteige. But could you perhaps be hinting at expansionism? That would seem to be bad idea since I undertand the Centeral American republics to be a very proud and inependent people. I could see, say El Salvadaor simply overun, but it could stir up trouble the Mexican Empire does not need.
 
Last edited:
Other Areas Throughout the 1870's

Italy:

Italy was one of the newest states in Europe, having recently been united under one flag in 1859. However, many Italians did not believe it was really united. Even Rome itself, the largest and most influential city on the Italian peninsula, was under the occupation of French troops. In Northern Italy, Austria-Hungary controlled large pieces of land that were ethnically Italian. In the early 1870's, some of the extremely nationalist politicians began using the term errante territori, or "wandering territories", to describe the ethnically Italian lands not under the Italian flag. This became popular to many Italians, and many formed groups that supported the idea of bringing these lands back to their rightful owner.

1875 marked the first victory for these Italian nationalists. The French were in the midst of turmoil that May, and the French garrison in Rome had become almost a skeleton force. On May 10th, the Italian Prime Minister, Benedetto Cairoli, and the Italian Parliament, agreed to take back Rome by force, and declared war on the Papal States. A few days later, after token resistance by the Papal States' small army and the small contingent of French soldiers, Rome was taken. The next month, after a plebiscite, the territory that had once been the Papal States was annexed into the Kingdom of Italy. Many in Europe were tense, as they thought this could lead to a wider war, and patrols on both the Italian and French sides of the border were put on high alert. However, France never made an official statement, even though French soldiers were involved in many of the short skirmishes. The tensions between the two nations were never really extinguished.

225px-Benedetto_Cairoli_iii.jpg

Benedetto Cairoli rode the Wave of Nationalism to the Prime Minister's Position in 1875

Ottoman Empire:

The war against Russia in 1875 was a disaster. Istanbul, although never taken, was only saved by the request for a cease-fire, and much of the Ottomans territory in the Balkans were now under Russian influence. Not to mention that the money it took to both fight the Russians and Serbians had depleted much of the Ottoman treasury. In 1876, the nation was finally succumbing to the sickness it had been stricken with for decades.

The Ottoman Empire's biggest problem was that it so far had been unsuccessful in stemming nationalist sentiments from its various nationalities. Although some reforms had been made during the Tanzimat Era from the 1830's-1860's to try and bring the different cultures together and create a nationalism centered around being an Ottoman, instead of an Armenian, Arab, Muslim, or non-Muslim, the reforms had not brought around much change. They had however, inspired a great amount of young men to try and reform the nation even further, and bring about a real change of direction. They called themselves the "Young Ottomans."

After the disastrous war against Russia, the Sultan, Abd Al-Aziz, had been deposed by his ministers, and inexplicably died a few days later, apparently by suicide. His successor Mehmed Murad V, wasn't much better, he was declared mentally ill after only a few weeks on the throne, but in that span of time was able to really agitate the reformist faction, by refusing to issue a new Constitution. By the ascension of Abdul Hamid II, many were at their boiling point.

Many did not know what to expect from the Sultan. Some thought he would have at least some liberal ideas, and actually many conservatives saw him as a threat. The Conservatives were proved wrong however. Hamid II was not a reformer, and had no intention of ever seriously pursuing a Constitution. The Young Ottomans were devastated by this. They had thought that just maybe this would be the time the Ottoman Empire truly turned a corner and modernized. The most senior of the Young Ottoman sympathizers, Ahmet Şefik Mithat Pasha, had been Grand Vizier until the outbreak of the Russo-Turkish War in 1875, but now was back, as a vocal supporter of the Ottoman reform movement.


1216072034midhatpasha.jpg

Ahmet Şefik Mithat Pasha

In February of 1876, a meeting was held between some Young Ottoman leaders, not including Mithat Pasha, and the half-brother of the Sultan, Mehmed V. The leaders convinced Mehmed V to support the movement toward a Constitutional Monarchy, and press his half brother for reform. If Abdul Hamid II refused however, the reformers would have no choice but to remove him from the throne. In this case, Mehmed V would become Sultan, and call for a new Constitution. The deal was essentially a coup d'etat, and although the removal of the Sultan would be noticed, the actual power grab would be behind closed doors, to spare the Ottoman Empire from outright civil war.

Over the next few weeks, the Ottomans continually called for a new Constitution, but the Sultan, once again refused. On the night of March 2nd, a large group of Young Ottomans, Mehmet V, and even some military officers, stormed Dolmabahçe Palace, and after a short skirmish with some palace guards, murdered Abdul Hamid II. The next day, the death was ruled as suicide, and Mehmet V took the throne, calling for a new Constitution in front of a loving crowd. On March 4th, Ahmet Şefik Mithat Pasha was and asked to oversee the formation of the new Constitutional Monarchy, and was reinstated as Grand Vizier. Although not a part of the actual coup, Mithat Pasha was aware of it, and however much he did not approve of the Young Ottoman's rash and impatient move, he accepted it nonetheless.

The Constitutional Era began in 1876, with the declaration of the new Ottoman Constitution by Mehmet V. The new government was made up of two houses, the Upper House which were appointed by the Sultan, and the Lower House which were elected by the people. Any man over 25 paying taxes could vote, making the Ottoman electorate one of the largest in Europe. No political parties were made, but throughout the the next year, especially in the Lower House, men of the same ideology grouped together, made deals, and tried to unite their electors, essentially creating parties in every way except in name. The Ottoman Empire seemed to have found a cure for its disease.

Spain:

In 1871, the new King of Spain, Amadeo I, standing alongside Juan Prim, declared he would uphold the Constitution and lead them to glory. In the years afterward, he did not lead the Spanish people to great power status, but he did hold the nation together during the Crash, something that many though would be impossible. Most of the credit does not really belong to him though. Although he had power, the influence over the nation's future really belonged to Juan Prim. Amadeo I did not take offense to this, he was content with his power, and let Prim and the Cortes, the main legislative body in Spain, handle the day-to-day affairs of the empire.

When the Crash struck in 1873, Spain was not hit as hard as the rest of Europe. There was not a whole lot of production in Spain at that time, and modernization efforts were put to the wayside, as the Spanish government wished to unite the country under the new government first. This was difficult enough, and was only made more so by the Carlists, who in 1874 rose up for the third time in Spanish history, beginning with a failed attempt on Juan Prim's life on September 6th, 1874. The Third Carlist War that followed was not very long, it only lasted a year, from the fall of 1874 to the late summer of 1875, when the Carlists were crushed in the northern sections of the country, specifically Navarre and the Basque country. With the victory over the insurrectionists, the Spanish government achieved a unity unknown to Spain in over a decade. The new government, led by the intensely popular Juan Prim, and the now moderately popular Amadeo I, looked to modernize, and look outward as well, attempting to reposition themselves as an imperial power. The first step was completed in 1878, when separatists on the island of Cuba were defeated by Spanish soldiers.


1873%20Don%20Carlose%20VII%20and%20staff.jpg

Carlist Insurgents in Navarre - 1875
 
EDIT:
Did you say Mexico is growing? My initial thought was growing in econmic terms and presteige. But could you perhaps be hinting at expansionism? That would seem to be bad idea since I undertand the Centeral American republics to be a very proud and inependent people. I could see, say El Salvadaor simply overun, but it could stir up trouble the Mexican Empire does not need.

Mmmm, I wouldnt say its borders are expanding, as much as its markets and influence are. So you are closer with your first guess.
 
Well that certainly clears matters up.

Italy is young, untested and spoiling for a fight. They have won a victory by conquering the Papal States and presumably gaining Rome as the Royal Captial. It took five years longer and seems to have proven more diffcult than OTL in actually seizing. Also Napoleon IV seems the type to hold a grudge, and he likely views the fall of Rome as an affront to French honor.

So Italy has more tension with France and continues to view Vienna with hatred. Hmm, considering the Franco-Prussian quarrel perhaps the Emperor in PAris will seek an accord with Emperor Franz Josef including agreements concerning Italy.

I assume a Papal microstate still exists?

The Ottomans are in a situation similar to the Habsburgs. They are undoubtedly in decline and are seekung reform to regain their prestiege. Nationalism is on the rise and even resonable proposals are unlikely to stop it. Especially with the Russians looming to strike another blow and the other Great Powers watching. A strong Ottoman Empire is not really desired by the other great powers, so one expect attempts to undermine the Young Ottomans. Also the Turks will have groups unwilling to share power in addition to seperatists.

Spain is doing well enough under Juan Prim and Amedeo. There will be a number of butterflies if the Aosta's remain in Iberia. My only real worry is that the situation would have such an impact on Cuba? The island is too close to ambitious America and the former Spanish colonies I think to rest easy. Though we may see a better Spanish performance when the Yankees make their move.

Good to hear it, regarding Imperial Mexico.
 
The Election of 1877


Ullysses S. Grant's Presidency never recovered from the riots of 1875, and really only got worse. His term was marred by numerous scandals, and although none of them included him personally, Grant and the Republican party became associated with corruption and greed, in a time when many Americans were hungry and poor. The administration was also criticized for its policy of patronage, as Grant would usually appoint his friends or colleagues from the war to positions that they sometimes were not qualified for.​

The corruption was highlighted in 1876, when a scandal that included some of the higher-ups in the Grant administration was made known to the public. After the defeat of the Sioux in 1874, the lands now under control of the U.S. government were being sold to the public for settlement. However, shortly after, much of the revenue that was recorded was not actually there. After about a year of investigating, a story broke in the Chicago Tribune that a group of Republican government officials, including the Secretary of Interior Columbus Delano and the President's own private secretary and old time war buddy Orville Babcock, were siphoning money out of the government revenues from selling off land. The news spread like wildfire, and many started calling the perpetrators the "Sioux Gang." The scandal was front page news the whole year, and much of the blame was put on Grant, who actually had nothing to do with the scandal. However, many saw it as just another link in a long chain of mishandled situations. It only got worse when Grant personally vouched for Orville Babcock, as Grant was convinced he was innocent and trusted him because of his relationship with Babcock through the Civil War.​

1877 was an election year, and the Democrats looked at the White House hungrily. They could see that the country was angry at the way the Republicans ran the country. They were angry at the economy, the were angry at the corruption, and they were angry at the way cronyism and patronage had taken control of the administration. The Democrats again nominated George Pendleton by a landslide, and picked Samuel Tilden, the corruption-taming Governor of New York, as the Vice-Presidential nominee. The two ran on a campaign of meritocracy, and anti-corruption, and began to gain momentum with much of the populace.​

Grant and his Vice-President Charles Adams, although he had many supporters, did not have much of a leg to stand on. He mainly focused on what he thought of as the unpatriotic actions of Pendleton, like his run for Vice-President in 1864 as a pro-peace Democrat. However, it had been almost 15 years since then. The economy and Grants record were tarnished by his actions, and many overlooked Pendleton's political past in favor of a better future. By 1878, the nation would have itself a Pendleton Presidency.​

The Election of 1877

George Pendleton/Samuel Tilden-212

Alabama
Arkansas
California
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maryland
Mississippi
Missouri
New Jersey
New York
North Carolina
Ohio
Oregon
South Carolina
Tennesse
Texas
Virginia
West Virginia​

Ullysses S. Grant/Charles Adams-157

Colorado
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Maine
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Nebraska
New Hampshire
Nevada
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
Vermont
Wisconsin​

Electoral Map
1877.GIF

1877.GIF
 
Last edited:
SilverSwimmer

Interesting in terms of the Democrats winning this time around. [Checking on Wiki the Republicans just hung on with Hayes as their candicate].

Just to check is there something missing in the section?


Although the the​

1877 was an election year, and the Democrats looked at the White House hungrily.​


Thanks

Steve
 
SilverSwimmer

Interesting in terms of the Democrats winning this time around. [Checking on Wiki the Republicans just hung on with Hayes as their candicate].

Just to check is there something missing in the section?




Thanks

Steve
[/LEFT]

No lol I forgot to take it out in editing
 
Quite interesting, Grant has paid the price for his scandalous term. I wonder how an earlier Demopcrati return to the White House will affect the nation in transit.

I was surprised the issue of how to deal with the Mexican Empire didn't come up. Since the Americans invested alot of pride in that policy I would think a Habsburg regime on their southern border would ruffle some feathers. And conversely there would be those business leaders who would want full recognition by the USA for the Empire to make it safer abnd easier for them to operate there. The South would also have some proMaxillian sentiment since some former Confederates would have friends maybe even family living. Not to mention exConfederates who fought in Mexico and have since repatriated.

I am guessing that since it was not mentioned the Mexican Question will be an unexpected headache for POTUS Pendleton?
 
Quite interesting, Grant has paid the price for his scandalous term. I wonder how an earlier Demopcrati return to the White House will affect the nation in transit.

I was surprised the issue of how to deal with the Mexican Empire didn't come up. Since the Americans invested alot of pride in that policy I would think a Habsburg regime on their southern border would ruffle some feathers. And conversely there would be those business leaders who would want full recognition by the USA for the Empire to make it safer abnd easier for them to operate there. The South would also have some proMaxillian sentiment since some former Confederates would have friends maybe even family living. Not to mention exConfederates who fought in Mexico and have since repatriated.

I am guessing that since it was not mentioned the Mexican Question will be an unexpected headache for POTUS Pendleton?

Everything in due time my friend. The Mexican Question will be, well Im not sure if answered is the right term, but it will be addressed in due time.



The next few updates will be not unlike 'The Crash of '73' series. They will all be centered around one topic, but will feature a broad array of issues.

And on that note....
 
The United States Under Pendleton: 1878-1886​

The last remaining months of Grant's Presidency was uneventful, but many were anxious. Because for the first time in twenty years, a Democrat would occupy the White House. It had been a tumultuous last five years under the Republicans, wracked by a Depression, a Worker's Revolt, various scandals in Washington, not to mention the mixed attitudes towards growing neighbors in the Hemisphere. But would the Democrats do any better? Would they steer the United States back on course?

America was facing a new world, one that was emerging from the brink of ruin, one with a new set of rules. How they handled the new issues the onset of the new decade had to offer would change the way Americans looked inward at themselves, and outward, across the borders and oceans. For how game-changing the 1870's were in politics, economics, and society, the 1880's would be arguably more so.

And George H. Pendleton would be at the helm.

george_h._pendleton_-_brady-handy.jpg

george_h._pendleton_-_brady-handy.jpg
 
Heh, indeed.

Well It would appear Perndleton will be getting reelected only to fall short. Question is wheter it is an assassin, natural, or resignation. I tend to err towards assassination since it seems the USA is in for another troublesome period.

I wonder how the Hawaiian question will go down? Sadly I do not really see it surving as an independent. So either a British Proitectorate(better) or a Yankee territory(OTL[aka worse]).

It would seem that the discord is far from played out.

"not to mention the mixed attitudes towards growing neighbors in the Hemisphere."

The Mexican Empire I presume? You know I can just see the Yankees lapping up the "banditos" as minutemen parallels and taking a shine to Juarez as a martyr for democracy. Though of course you woul;d have on the other side americans pleased at a "proper" ruler for Mexico who seems so amenable to business.
 
Heh, indeed.

Well It would appear Perndleton will be getting reelected only to fall short. Question is wheter it is an assassin, natural, or resignation. I tend to err towards assassination since it seems the USA is in for another troublesome period.

I wonder how the Hawaiian question will go down? Sadly I do not really see it surving as an independent. So either a British Proitectorate(better) or a Yankee territory(OTL[aka worse]).

It would seem that the discord is far from played out.

"not to mention the mixed attitudes towards growing neighbors in the Hemisphere."

The Mexican Empire I presume? You know I can just see the Yankees lapping up the "banditos" as minutemen parallels and taking a shine to Juarez as a martyr for democracy. Though of course you woul;d have on the other side americans pleased at a "proper" ruler for Mexico who seems so amenable to business.

mmm the years for Presidency are 8 years, the years have just changed because of the earlier mishap with Lincoln and Johnson, envoking the Presidential Succession Act of 1792.

I have not thought of Hawaii yet, but independent is definately not the path its taking.

And yes, I was talking of Mexico, although the US has many neighbors.
 
Domestic Policy​
Part I

The domestic policy of Grant was largely considered a failure, and many Americans were were tired of the Depression, were tired of the corruption, and tired of the patronage system that had to the opinion of many citizens been the cause of many of the United States' woes. The spoils system was also one of the major talking points used by Pendleton in the election, and so in the first year of his time in office, Pendleton went to war in the name of meritocracy.

The subsequent bill, or the Civil Service Reform Act of 1878, was passed with ease, and was applauded by the public as a strong positive step in government. The Reform Act set up a testing system to weed out qualified individuals, so that the government would be run by competent employees. The bill only specified a few jobs that would be affected by the bill, however it said that outgoing Presidents could convert different jobs under the umbrella of federal civil service into jobs that were protected under the act. That provision to the law made it so that by the turn of the century, more than 60% of all people in federal civil service were there because of merit based reasons. In addition, The Department of Civil Service, which protected all jobs under the Act, and made sure no politician or elected official could fire anyone under the scope of this bill.

This was the first popular victory for Pendleton, and earned him praise from much of the populace. Only a year into the Presidency, he seemed to be riding a wave of positivity and support from Americans, and it got even better. Since the end of the bloody Sioux War about four years before, the settlers who had taken the land had been very busy in the Black Hills. Tons of minerals, especially gold, poured into the economy from not only the Dakotas, but from other areas out West, finally taking the nation out of recession. Ironically, it was President Grant's Indian policy that actually was the reason for the bounce back, however the credit for the turn-around was given to Pendleton.

The new gold influx, in addition to revitalizing the economy, had another effect on the populace; it almost single-handedly destroyed the growing pro-silver sentiment rising up from many of the farmers and miners throughout the country. The pro-silver faction of the United States had been moderately popular in the mid-1870's, especially during the worst of the Crash. The plan was to repeal the Coinage Act of 1873, which had basically put the United States on the gold standard, and adopt a "free silver" policy, where that a person could deposit any amount of silver at a U.S. Mint, and receive their share of silver coins, just as anyone with gold could do. Many farmers and miners during the Crash supported it, as they believed it was the gold standard that brought them into the Crash, going so far as to call the Coinage Act the "Crime of '73". However the majority of Eastern bankers and politicians refused to buy into the trend, as they believed that it the plan would cause inflation and hurt the banks, which were already in enough trouble.

Finally in 1878, a Republican Senator from Nevada, John P. Jones introduced a bill to the Senate, that would force the government to buy at least five million dollars worth of gold each month from the west, and was to be printed as silver coins. The bill wasn't put forth in time for 1878, but the next year was introduced to the floor again, and to the surprise of many, the Jones Silver Act of 1879 was passed by both the House and Senate by slim margins. George Pendleton, who was a pro-gold Democrat, vetoed the bill, banking on the fact that the slim margins would not be enough to override his veto. He was right, and the override attempt was a failure, enraging the pro-silver contingent. Or what was left of the pro-silver contingent anyway; by the time the debates were over, the public had lost interest in the entire issue. Miraculously, the economy had revived itself with the help of man's favorite mineral, gold.

160px-JohnPJones.jpg
John P. Jones
The Face of Free Silver

160px-JohnPJones.jpg
 
Hmm, can't say I'm aware oif how far this diverges from OTL.

That civil service bill is a step in the right direction. The end of the depression also amends several wose in the middleterm.

Ironic that it is Grant's war that makes the prosperity elevating his successor in the public eye. I imagine that will come up in his memoirs!

Glad to see this TL continue!

So is this part 1 of the domestic policy section? Or part 1 being the domrstic policy section? I will be eager to see how the South is haping up with the Bushwacker butterflies and the Foreign policy in which Emperor Maximilian will be a major issue.
 
Hmm, can't say I'm aware oif how far this diverges from OTL.

That civil service bill is a step in the right direction. The end of the depression also amends several wose in the middleterm.

Ironic that it is Grant's war that makes the prosperity elevating his successor in the public eye. I imagine that will come up in his memoirs!

Glad to see this TL continue!

So is this part 1 of the domestic policy section? Or part 1 being the domrstic policy section? I will be eager to see how the South is haping up with the Bushwacker butterflies and the Foreign policy in which Emperor Maximilian will be a major issue.

It does diverge a bit here, as the US is still purely gold, and the Civil Service passed earlier. This is part 1 of the Domestic policy section btw.
 
Nowak, Kyle. The Melting Pot: The History of America's Immigration Phenomenon. New York, NY: Forrester Publishing, 1997. Print.

"The new wave of immigration began in the late 1860's, riding in on the Post-Civil War boom. However, it was not made up of the same nationalities as the first era. Before the Civil War, Irish, German, English and other Northern Europeans made up the biggest contingent. Afterwards, the majority of immigrants coming to the United States were from Southern Europe and Asia, a trend that only increased after The Crash in 1873. The second half of the 19th century saw huge swathes of French, Polish, Italian, Russian and even Turkish immigrants coming from Europe and settling in the United States, with Chinese immigrants doing the same from Asia. The resulting ethnic shift during this period brought large changes on a national level, both socially and politically."

Part 2: Immigration

First because of the economic prosperity the United States had after the Civil War and then because of the economic situation in their own nations, immigrants were driven to the United States during the seventies and eighties en masse. During the 1870's almost 3.5 million immigrants arrived in America's ports, and it showed no signs of decreasing the next decade.

The second rise in immigration was a profound social event, made so by not only the actual trend of immigration, but also the actual immigrants themselves, and their nationalities. The French personified this well. In the aftermath of the Socialist Rebellion of 1875, the government crackdown was strict to say the least. From 1875-1880, 46,000 French men, women, and children emigrated to the United States, mostly to Maine, parts of New Hampshire, and Louisiana. Only about 5% of them even had ties to the revolutionaries in Paris, but every Frenchman coming into the United States was subject to harsh inquiries about their past life in the mother country. It wasn't without reason however, as many in America, especially bosses, saw them as one of the influences for the strikers that had just recently ravaged much of the Mid-West, and had no tolerance for any dissenters. One notable immigrant was Claude Monet, who had came to the United States after being suspected of revolutionary activities in France and being repeatedly hassled by police. Although he later returned, some of his finest work was done on the banks of the Hudson River north of New York City, and many of his paintings reside in New York's Museum of Art.

Monet+Lavacourt-Sunshine-and-Snow.jpg
Snow and Sunshine in the Hudson Valley by Claude Monet (1879)

The Chinese were also a nationality that came under harsh criticism during the turn of the decade. The late 1860's saw a large influx of Chinese immigrants, who confined themselves mostly to labor and mining jobs. Many of the West's railroads owed their completion to the Chinese, including the western portion of the Transcontinental Railroad that was finished in 1869. By the time of The Crash, Chinese immigrants had begun to crack into management jobs in some of the Western Railroad companies. But unfortunately, the economic crisis brought hard times for the Chinese. Although many kept their jobs because of the fact that they worked for much less than the common white male, this was also the reason they began to feel the hatred from their neighbors. In San Francisco, where a large Chinese population resided, Chinese stores and businesses were firebombed and looted, resulting in the formation of Chinatowns in many cities. One of the most outspoken Nativist's was Dennis Kearney, a labor organizer who started an anti-Chinese campaign in the late 1870's, using the slogan "The Chinese Must Go!" The slogan caught on with many Western laborers and miners who lost their jobs during The Crash, and many unions were behind it as well. In 1880, Kearney's campaign almost reached success as a bill, which called for banning anyone with Chinese descent from acquiring citizenship and from entering the country. The bill passed, but was vetoed by President Pendleton, to the disgruntlement of many Westerners. However, a bill was passed that did not allow Chinese immigrants to become naturalized, only children born on US soil were allowed to be citizens. Over the next few years, Kearney and his followers in California supported the discrimination of Chinese immigrants as more and more emigrated to the United States during the early 1880's. California itself passed many anti-Chinese bills, most of whom were later repealed due to unconstitutionality.

Many people had a problem with the new phase of immigration, and some became committed to stopping it, sometimes even resorting to violence. For some, the solution was a recreation of an old establishment, the White Knights. This time however, they did not only target blacks, but immigrants as well. The new Knights were very widespread, not only fixed in the South as they had been in the 1860's. It was also interestingly enough the first time the Knights were not viewed as a paramilitary group, and more as an organization. In 1885, the White Knights had more than two million followers, the most it ever was in American history. Interestingly enough though, different areas of the country stressed more of one value than another. In the South, racism against blacks was very common, and lynchings were widespread, but in the West, racism and violence was focused on the Chinese. This lead to a more disorganized setup of the White Knights then the first era, and many times, the only thing similar about the different regions White Knights was the name itself, which may have been the reason for its quick run. By 1890, the White Knights were again a thing of the past.

Monet+Lavacourt-Sunshine-and-Snow.jpg
 
Foreign Policy
Part 1

Whether the United States liked it or not, the world was getting smaller and smaller, and America's role in it was getting bigger and bigger. It's industrial base, resources, and population made it a economic powerhouse, and with it could potentially change the course of the rest of the world much easier than many other nations might like. By the time George Pendleton took office, the United States was on the verge of becoming one of the Great Powers, and was beginning to jostle for the position of the world's top dog. But in order to do so, it would also have to have a successful foreign policy.

Of course the main thorn in the side of America's foreign policy was the Mexican Issue. Since the proclamation of empire in the 1860's, Mexico had been a ulcer on the Monroe Doctrine. How could the United States allow a European monarch to take the throne of a nation in the Western Hemisphere, when the basis of American foreign policy for the last half century was to make sure that did not happen? And it was easier said than done. The Mexican Empire was growing, and many nations depended on its growth. Unfortunately, to some extent, the United States was one of them. Millions of dollars were invested into the infrastructure and industry of Mexico, and an announcement that the America did not recognize the Empire as legitimate would not only be punished by a suspension of trade, but also most likely an act of war. And so, for the first time in a long time, the United States needed to tread carefully around its southern neighbors.

Because of this, America's stance on Mexico had been in limbo for almost a decade. The United States did not officially oppose the Empire as legitimate, nor did it officially recognize it, for fear of public outrage over the loss of American prestige. This however, presented problems for business owners, as the lack of recognition put them at a legal disadvantage. By the early 1880's, investors, bosses, and entrepreneurs were lobbying Congress regularly for a vote on the recognition of Mexico. The President needed to make a choice. Should he take the bullet for business? Or stand up for America's ideals? Or something else entirely?

In the end, Pendleton, and his Secretary of State, Grover Cleveland, spent an entire week with almost no sleep in the Fall of 1883 drafting his plan for Mexico. In what became known as the Pendleton Amendment (or the Mexican Amendment by some satirists), the American government stated that the American government could accept a nation under the influence or control of a European power if it was decided that it was for the best interest for the American people. In the subsequent speech announcing the decision, Pendleton called on Congress to recognize Mexico as a legitimate nation. The speech was met with mixed results, but it served its purpose, and the President successfully avoided both extremes of the Mexican Issue, and business could now go on as usual.

grover_cleveland__painting_by_anders_zorn.jpg
Grover Cleveland, The Man Behind The Pendleton Amendment

The other concern about Mexico was that, not only was it closely to European powers, was that it was beginning to influence other nations in the Western Hemisphere, specifically in Central America. As the United States had begun investing in Mexico in the 1870's, the Mexican government was now investing in other, smaller Central American nations, most specifically Guatemala. The United States, while as first only slightly agitated, soon became seriously threatened, when in 1885, Mexico assisted its neighbor in a war against El Salvador, in which Guatemala was united with its defeated foe, forming the Republic of Central America, under the control of Justo Barrios. It seemed that Mexico was now openly competing with the United States for control over Central America.

grover_cleveland__painting_by_anders_zorn.jpg
 
Last edited:
Foreign Policy Part 2
Cleveland and the "New Navy"


In the aftermath of the 1st Central American War, where Mexican-equipped Guatemalan forces invaded and annexed the small neighboring country of El Salvador in the summer and fall of 1885, America quickly realized it was not the only nation in the Western Hemisphere that could exert influence. Even more scary was the fact that during this war, American military officials realized that the United States was no longer in a military position to really push around its smaller neighbors. During the 1870's, especially after The Crash, the American military, with the exception of some of the forces in the West, fell into disrepair. This was most seen in the Navy, where wooden ships were still a commonplace among US fleets. During the fighting in El Salvador, the US Pacific fleet had been sent to watch over the fighting, until the Mexican fleet stopped them near the Mexican's home port of Acapulco. The Mexican fleet far outgunned the Americans, they had just purchased three modern ships from France, two armored cruisers and one battleship, that alone could have given the Pacific fleet a bloody nose, if not sink most of the ships. The American fleet was forced to sail back with its tail between its legs, and the newspapers had one hell of a story the next morning.

The Pendleton Administration had no real position over re-armantment, it had never come up, and they had just let it be, focusing more on fixing the domestic issues that had plagued the United States for the last decade. There was not much he could even really do about it now, by the time of the embarrassment at Acapulco, his term was up in only two more months. Luckily however, his successor would be from his own party, and someone he could influence to continue his policies..

Grover Cleveland had a very interesting road to the Presidency. First off, Pendleton had not even supported him at first, instead hand-picking Vice-President Samuel Tilden as his successor. The nomination was then almost locked-up, all the Democrats being in favor of "Pendleton's Man." But then, Tilden suddenly died in his sleep in the late summer of 1885. This was visibly upsetting for Pendleton, who viewed him as not only a partner, but a close friend. Politically however, it meant that someone would need to take the helm of the Democratic party. In stepped Grover Cleveland, the man behind the Pendleton Amendment, and a very similar politician to the President, having very similar views on much of issues both foreign and domestic. After winning the nomination, Cleveland went on to defeat his Republican opponent, James Blaine. The campaign became fierce, mostly from Blaine's side, as the Republicans took every shot at Cleveland they could, including an allegation that Cleveland had a child out of wedlock. Cleveland, who actually confessed to the public that he did in fact have a bastard child, still won the election by a large margin. So in March of 1886, Grover Cleveland took the oath of office.

Cleveland's Presidency would be most known for its active role in beginning the revival of the Navy. The Navy ordered four new armored cruisers, as well as five smaller protected cruisers, all of which began construction in the fall and winter of 1886-1887. The new ships, the USS Maine, Nevada, New York, Alabama, New Orleans, Tallahassee, Boston, Charleston, and San Francisco became the backbone of the "New American Navy." And it was about time too. Other nations all around the world were beginning to bulk up, as the race for colonies and the fight for supremacy in Europe were heating up.

USS_Atlanta_1884.jpg
USS Charleston After Completion

USS_Atlanta_1884.jpg
 
Fascinating, the American foreign policy is a bit like that Van Winkle legend, they wake up too find the shape of the world has changed.

Mexico their "lesser" neighbor has forced their hand twice now. Once by making them dance a frantic jig around recognizing reality against their jingo. Secondly by forcing their nacy to bug off. I imagine the Acapulco incident was quite celebrated in Mexico. For Maximmillian it is a major boost, that his Empiure has donew what the Republics could not, turn back the colossus.

And it looks like the Mexian Habsburgs are playing the game of thrones with the Centeral Republics. Smart to use Guatmala as a proxy instead of direct conquest. The new name for Greater Guatamaela is likely sending off alarm bells, with many fearing Justo Barrios is aiming to retake the Former United PRovinces.

Good for Clevelanmd getting elected despite scandal. With the Yankees getting back in the game it seems only a matter of time until tensions rise again. Probasbly in a proxy war called the 2nd Centeral American War between the RCA and whoever the Americans are backing.

I wonder how Long Maximillian will live? His brother endured for quite awhile to put it mildly, soi the matter of succession could be quite a ways off.
 
Top