Ming777
Monthly Donor
While thats understandable I think its better for the TL to follow what makes sense than what turns people off, like you said it is already dystopic so I see no reason to hold back on that wheter we can take it or not
I do however think your reasoning in the second paragraph makes sense, like you said, a lot of those nukes were indeed old and unrepaired
The issue though is that the TL already had addressed that(the malfunctioning missiles failing to launch and blowing up in the silos) and the over a hundred ones that did make it were the functional ones
I mean, depending on how many nukes the US just launched over North American airspace, many of those warheads needed to get past what is almost a wall of nuclear explosions.
PS: Given the TL diverged in 1993, and the nuclear exchange was on April 10, 1996, there is about two and a half years for the world to scramble in preparation for potential nuclear armageddon.
and those earlier malfunctions were when the ICBMs were still a complete missile (stages+warheads). Not necessarily accounting for the failures of the warheads themselves.
Last edited: