The Coronation of the Hun

I'll admit I'm not as happy with what I have here. It's a pretty short period of time for the Slavs to rise. I mean, just 60 years before the Slavs were still foederates.

My reasoning behind all of this is because the Slavs were able to establish centralized states very quickly, the Roman people still inhabiting Gaul being very used to the concept of state sovreignty. Not to mention the fact that the Slavs were wielding a powerful army to begin with...

I may redo this in the TL's final draft, but hey, I'm pretty happy with it...

(Update on previous page)
 
Last edited:
Would it be Al-Andalus if there are no Vandals? I thought that's where the name Andalus came from, since Southern Spain had been a part of the Vandal Kingdom for so long.
 
Imajin said:
Would it be Al-Andalus if there are no Vandals? I thought that's where the name Andalus came from, since Southern Spain had been a part of the Vandal Kingdom for so long.

True. I'm going to have to come up with another name. But for now, I thinkt he meaning of al-Andalus is understood.
 
Great installment - I'm wondering about the Bretons - have they been utterly wiped out or are they up in Scotland?

I think the draft is fine -
 
G.Bone said:
Great installment - I'm wondering about the Bretons - have they been utterly wiped out or are they up in Scotland?

I think the draft is fine -

The Romano-Brits went out with a whimper. Some cultural outposts existed in Wales and Scotland, however by 787 they were absorbed by the Franks and Celts.

And thank you, I really was doubting this update. (Now that I see it's agreeable, I don't have to go back and rewrite. :eek: )
 
Well - I would really doubt that they would be called France. I was thinking a more variation on that "idea" of France. What happens to Wales, Scotland & Ireland?

Would you be interested with a co-writer?
 
G.Bone said:
Well - I would really doubt that they would be called France. I was thinking a more variation on that "idea" of France. What happens to Wales, Scotland & Ireland?

I did fiddle around with calling it "Bretagne", but then I realized that was a word from modern French. Then I figured I'd call it "Brittanië". After all, Dutch is a direct descendent of Frankish. But then I realized, "Why would the Franks call their land anything but something analagous to the "Land of the Franks"?

But I am interested in hearing what you propose it might be called.

And as co-writer, what exactly would you do? Would we PM each other ideas concerning the TL, and we just collaborate? (Sorry, new to the whole TL writing thing)
 
Well "France" is a corruption of "Francia" that was used for the area around Paris, and Francia is a Latinization of whatever the early Germanic Frankish Kingdom called themselves, either Frankreich, which is also the OTL German word for France, or Franken, the name for Franconia in German, which is another area where the Franks settled.
 
originally posted by Thermopylae
Quote:
Originally Posted by Imajin
Would it be Al-Andalus if there are no Vandals? I thought that's where the name Andalus came from, since Southern Spain had been a part of the Vandal Kingdom for so long.


True. I'm going to have to come up with another name. But for now, I thinkt he meaning of al-Andalus is understood.

Hmm, in fact is a theory popularly accepted the vandal origin but in fact lately it seems that is a theory disregarded now by the etimologists, there are two theories that seems now with more acceptance between the etimologists than the popularly accepted of the vandals.

This link is in spanish and shows the three theories and the fact that it seems better prefered now the other two than the popular vandal origin
http://www.webislam.com/numeros/2000/00_7/Articulos_007/Nombre_andalus.htm

also we have the wikipedia that effectively also mentions this fact that now it seems that the vandal theory is not more accepted

"The etymology of the word al-Āndalus is uncertain. The word is popularly thought to be derived from the Vandals, the Germanic tribe who settled in southern Iberia and Northern Africa. However, scholars are by no means in agreement. The notion of it originating with the Vandals, who supposedly devastated southern Spain so severely in a mere twenty-two years of tenure (407-429) as to leave their name forever imprinted on it, gained in popularity over time and survives - but it is a theory put forth without much basis, bolstered perhaps by homophony. Three possible etymologies have been advanced in recent times. The first, the Vandal link, is largely disregarded now, and the question of the origin of the Arabic name, given to the entire peninsula, is still open to debate.
[edit]
https://www.alternatehistory.com/Discussion/
Vandalícia

Reinhart Dozy (1820-1883), Dutch author of the famous History of the Muslims of Spain (4 vols., Turner, Madrid, 1984), advanced the theory according to which the name of al-Āndalus is an Arabic rendition of Vandalicia or Vandalucía, on the assumption that the Roman province of Hispania Baetica (southern Spain) could have acquired and retained this name-association, not in Iberia itself, but among the Arabs of the Maghreb. The possible reason may be the existence of a Vandal kingdom in southern Spain before its conquest by the visigoths radicated in Toledo. Escaping from them, the vandals invaded North Africa and established a new kingdom in Carthage.
Miguel de Cervantes, in his Don Quixote, attests the use of Vandalia in the XVII century as a cultivated synonym of Andalusia: a would-be knight errant searching for a poetic name for his dame, one Casilda from Andalusia, chooses Casildea de Vandalia DQ, II, 14.
[edit]
https://www.alternatehistory.com/Discussion/
Atlántida

The Spanish philologist Joaquín Vallvé Bermejo, in his The Territorial Divisions of Muslim Spain (CSIC, Madrid, 1986), is of the opinion that Al-Andalus, as in Jazirat al-Andalus, translates pure and simply as "Atlantis" or "island of the Atlantic":
Arabic texts offering the first mentions of the island of al-Andalus and the sea of al-Andalus become extraordinarily clear if we substitute this expressions with "Atlántida" or "Atlantic". The same can be said with reference to Hercules and the Amazons whose island, according to Arabic commentaries of these Greek and Latin legends, was located in jauf al-Andalus — that is, to the north or interior of the Atlantic Ocean. [edit]
https://www.alternatehistory.com/Discussion/
Landahlauts

An etymology was advanced recently by H. Halm in "Al-Andalus und Gothica Sors", in Welt des Orients, vol. 66, 1989, pp 252-263, and drawn upon by Marianne Barrucand/Achim Bednorz in Arquitectura Islámica en Andalucía, Köln, Taschen, 1992, pp 12-13. Halm dismisses any links with the Vandals, an association he finds without foundation, and offers instead an interesting explanation. According to him the name "Al-Andalus" is simply an Arabic rendition of the Visigothic name given to the Roman province of Baetica. The Visigoths, following the custom of their Germanic predecessors, parcelled out the conquered territories by drawing lots, and the allotments to anyone, with their corresponding land, was called "Sortes Gothicae". Contemporary texts, still written in Latin, refer to the Gothic kingdom as a whole as "Gothica sors" (singular). It is reasonable to suppose then that the corresponding Gothic designation "Landahlauts" (allotted, inherited, drawn land), in its phonetic form — "landalos" — became easily and spontaneously, to Arabic ears, "Al-Andalus".
  • Lôt (Gothic hlauts): allotment, inheritance; cf. Old High German hlôz, modern German Los, which passed into French as lot and Castilian as lote; whence "lottery," "loterie," "lotería," etc."
Although in fact because the visigoths were defeated in TTL in 468 we are in the same problem, althoug is possible that name Al-andalus could be used in TTL if we agree with the second theory (although it seems that the third theory is the most accepted now -the visigoth origin).
 
I suppose I'll go with Theory #2 for now, but I like my TLs to have variety, so I'm going to see what alternate names could be given.

You wouldn't happen to have any ideas, would you Inaki?
 
Imajin said:
Well "France" is a corruption of "Francia" that was used for the area around Paris, and Francia is a Latinization of whatever the early Germanic Frankish Kingdom called themselves, either Frankreich, which is also the OTL German word for France, or Franken, the name for Franconia in German, which is another area where the Franks settled.

That was my reasoning behind calling it "France" or "Francia"...

Al-Ispanya sounds good...
 

Keenir

Banned
This is a very interesting timeline; bravo on a masterwork....you sure this is your first ATL? better than some I've seen.

Thermopylae said:
649 AD - Arabs take Cyprus. Leo is able to reunite the dying Western Empire, saying that if they do not present a solid front to the Muslim, then all of Christendom is doomed.

Speaking of which, I've noticed that, aside from the last of the Arians, there aren't any heresies in the Christian world, no religious disputes lasting more than ten years.....I'm wondering how long this will last.

654 AD - Arabs attempt to invade Rhodes, however Callistus puts up an intense fight, and Rhodes is spared. Realizing that the last remnants of the Colossus, precious artifacts, were threatened, the remaining pieces are shipped to Constantinople.

....and are promptly melted down.

:)

Western Slavs settle down, but re-divide. They are now a collection of smaller units, headed by more local rulers. However, already there are plans being made for stronger local rulers to rise. The Western Slavs will not stay divided forever...

'There are plans being made for stronger rulers to rise'? (given that they're already headed by local rulers, I'm not sure I see the difference)


Leo during his life tried many times to bear a son, but ended up with five daughters. He dies without an heir, after the Senate votes down any bid for an Empress. While officially the Senate has no power over him, he knew that to put a daughter on the throne would invite the assasination of his entire family.

Why would that invite assassination?
 

Keenir

Banned
Fabilius said:
But wouldn´t the church make fuss out of that?

It was the church that at first brought slavery to an end inside the roman empire.

Actually, some of the early Church fathers, including some of the original Apostles (if I recall correctly), said that one should convert - master and slave alike - making both brothers in Christ. Nothing about ending slavery.
 
The church did actually help to bring slavery to an end though (or at least to a more reduced form).

To Thermopylae: Will the two "Roman Empires" ever merge again, or will they remain seperate?
 
Also, I was thinking now in TTL the battle of Talas of OTL happens in the same time in 751?, I say this because with the definitive fall of the Persian Sassanid Empire delayed in TTL (in TTL the fall was in 670 and not in 651 OTL), the islamic expansion in the east I suppose is different (at least the rythm of expansion).

If exists the battle of Talas or some kind of confrontation between Caliphate and the Chines what is the outcome? the same that in OTL victory of The Caliphate or in TTL the chinese have win.

Apart of this I am looking your maps (they are interesting and differents than of the others timelines in Ah.com, little but cool) and I was thinking these maps remember me something.

Hmm..

Yes I remember this maps: they are very similar in form and weight and composition that the maps of an old PC strategy game, a little and very cool gem of 1986 by PSS "Annals of Rome", a very addictive game:cool: .

I have curiosity Thermopylae. Do you know this game?
 
The mapppppppppppppppppppp....

Point out what's wrong...

ik.PNG
 
Good map:) (although I recognise feeling sympathy by the little format maps, they remember a lot of the maps of the PC game "Annals of Rome")

So I suppose this is the beginning of the colaboration of G. Bone as co-writer? (Hmm, no doubt that this timeline could be very interesting with a team work of Thermopilae-G. Bone)

Only the abbasid Caliphate controls all Persia (this includes the actual region of Tabriz) so some more yellow in the map to make all the actual Iran painted in yellow.

Hmm, now that I see the map, I know that the abbasid caliphate is beginning to fall apart with the Magrib being controlled by muslim landlords, but who controls the balearic islands, Sardinia and Corsica?
 
The Abbasid Caliphate isn't falling apart because it lacks control of the Maghreb. Historically, the Ummayyads had trouble controlling that region, and the Abbasids exercised almost zero control over it.

Basically G.Bone will be my editor and map maker. I also hope that he contributes ideas and his own personal experience and knowledge into the TL-writing process.

@G.Bone

Sure, I'll co-write A healthy baby boy for you. Mostly editing, right?

But you also mentioned giving ideas about Oz, US, etc. I'm going to need you to write me up a brief run-down of what is different there from OTL. Nothing big, just a few sentences about each continent...

For the Abs, use this map here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Abbasid_Provinces_during_the_caliphate_of_Harun_al-Rashid.JPG

Just pay attention to the borders that apply to the map you have provided (great map, BTW!). Oh, and pay attention to the last map I made to further the accuracy of the borders.

Other changes:

-Divide the Serbs' realms, if possible. I know, the kingdoms are tiny, so if you can't manage it, it's not a big deal.

-Move the Roman Confed's lands further south, not by much, just a bit.

-"Land of the French" prolly should be "Land of the Franks". IIRC Franks was still the preferred term by this point... Not sure... No big, it's fine, really...

-The names in S.Italy are jumbled a bit. The one bordering Papal States is Napoli, SE Napoli is Taranto, and SW Napoli is Reggio.

That should do it. Thanks! :D
 
Top