The Burning Cauldron: The Neo Assyrian Empire Defended

Another glorious update to this great TL!

Dugul-Naboo's ambitions of kingship seemed to have been quietly shelved, smart man.

Urartu is recovering, interesting that.

By the way, the way the Assyrian state works in fascinating. Won't the way these Protectorates seem to be their own separate powerbases backfire in the long run? How did the Assyrians do this?

Elam and the Medians seem to be the next problem for the Assyrian state. Its Deportation Time?

Btw... aren't the italian peoples who become the germ of Etruria and then Rome, include people who came from Lydia? Does this mean Rome and many Etrurian-descended folks are butterflied by default?

I don't think Necho II is out yet. Still, Egyptian autonomy on a ticking clock here. Egypt must find a way to stand against an hegemonic power in the Middle East, or will always lose. Perhaps the future is expanding south to Nubia and Punt, maybe East to Lybia?

Dugul-Naboo most likely did not expect the young king to gain a victory. His claim to the throne would be far stronger had Assur-Uballit taken the throne by force. But with Sinbanipal still in power and Maniuqappu ascendant, even if old, is too dangerous to make a move.

Biai/Urartu is not recovered per sé, but it has now been many years since its destruction and it has some semblance of stability returning. The fall of the Medes, Scythians and Cimmerians under their Assyrian masters has done them many good. Urartu will play a great role for this timeline moving forward.

Assyrian protectorates are similar to the Chinese protectorates, established bureaucratic generalships that rule for limited periods of time. This system was constructed by Tiglath Pileser III and what may be seen as the bureaucratic reconfiguration of the Assyrian state.

We will see what will occur with Elam and Media, what do you think will happen?

EDIT: Regarding Egypt, do remember the relation between Korea and China....Not saying this will be the mirror in otl, but it is a plausible route that could occur, Egypt remaining a regional power, but always a sort of rebellious tributary with whom Assyria finds to be uninteresting or too troublesome.

Generally, only two Assyrian rulers went to war with Egypt, Assurhadon and Assurbanipal and now Sinbanipal. The Egyptians were less the interest and from what we can tell, Assyria did not find Egypt of economic interest aside from deterrence. Assyria was ultimately a power that originally looked directly west into Syria, east into the Iranian plateau and north into the mountains and above that, the vast steppe of Eurasia, beyond the northern sea (Black Sea).

---Remember, this timeline is ultimately an exercise in a universal empire and 'China' like entity in the western world that is not the Roman Empire. ---
 
Last edited:
There seems to have been some sort of connection between Asia Minor and the Bronze/Iron Age transition in mid-Tyrrhenian Italy, yes, with Etruscan, Latin and Hellenic legendary material about that, but if it actually ever happened, must have been a lot earlier that TTL's timeframes.

Yes, from what I understand the Etrurian cities are established, as is the early city of Rome. So, the fall of Lydia, which will not happen as otl, will not have an enormous effect upon Rome or the Italic states.
 
Another good update. I find the decision to accept Nicias interesting. Allowing a random jumped up mercenary to keep power seems like a bad idea but maybe this is me projecting later ideas of rule back on the Assyrians.
 
Another good update. I find the decision to accept Nicias interesting. Allowing a random jumped up mercenary to keep power seems like a bad idea but maybe this is me projecting later ideas of rule back on the Assyrians.

Assyrians carried far less regard for the idea of lineage and so forth, especially of non-Assyrians-Babylonians, as the Kalhu Codex mentioned a few updates ago, 'the Great Gods favor the strong.' Assyrian governors were almost always eunuchs when it was outside of Babylon or Assyria. Holdings were sometimes granted to relatives or nobility, but rarely governor positions, these were typically eunuchs or otherwise some sort of bureaucrat who was not of the nobility. So, this is different than say the Elamo-Persian respect for noble lineage and custom or the later European view of lineage and ancestry. We shoudl remind ourselves, that the current royal family of Assyria, was begun by a general who may have been a mercenary, who was at least simply a general in the army and possessed a name called Puzu, which may have been Western-Semitic. The Nobility of Assyria also would probably find the role of ruling Aleppo as somewhat demeaning, they would much prefer to be given a post in Assyria and be gifted reserved spots in military command, than to rule some far off devastated town in Amurru (Syria).

EDIT: Most importantly though, Sinbanipal does not have the time to launch a siege when Necho II is on the run and he has promised his army the loots of Egypt.
 
Mesopotamian King List has been updated somewhat, with the victory at Assur, the Kalhu Codex recorded for him an epithet. He still has not attained the title of King of the Universe however, this arrives only after a seventh military campaign, this will be his first currently.

Also, a question for the readers; moving forward, as part of the tl, we would like to keep in mind a series of kingships of both Mesopotamia and other important states. Thus, a king list tradition is a major interest for this tl. The question is, do the readers wish to have king lists for Egypt, Elam, Urartu and so forth placed as a threadmark in the thread or do you want me to make a new thread and simply place links to them in threadmarks here.

@CalBear What would be the ruling on this from a forums rules perspective? If we decided to not place these king's lists in the thread, is there a particular section of the forum that would be appropriate for such postings that would simply be references and supplements to the timeline at hand.
 

CalBear

Moderator
Donor
Monthly Donor
Mesopotamian King List has been updated somewhat, with the victory at Assur, the Kalhu Codex recorded for him an epithet. He still has not attained the title of King of the Universe however, this arrives only after a seventh military campaign, this will be his first currently.

Also, a question for the readers; moving forward, as part of the tl, we would like to keep in mind a series of kingships of both Mesopotamia and other important states. Thus, a king list tradition is a major interest for this tl. The question is, do the readers wish to have king lists for Egypt, Elam, Urartu and so forth placed as a threadmark in the thread or do you want me to make a new thread and simply place links to them in threadmarks here.

@CalBear What would be the ruling on this from a forums rules perspective? If we decided to not place these king's lists in the thread, is there a particular section of the forum that would be appropriate for such postings that would simply be references and supplements to the timeline at hand.
THis hread would be good a place as any, at least until you reach 2008 or so (if it resembles OTL at that point!)
 
I think it would be better to have the king-lists thread-marked on this thread. Having it all in one place should make it easier and means we only have to follow one thread for updates..
 
Ruler Compendium// For Kemet/Musur/Egypt
'The Pir'uuh (Pharaoh) of Mushur (Kemet/Egypt, in Akkadian, similar to Hebrew Mistrataim or Arabic, Misr) are claimants to lands of the Nile, ruling as they do their land which they have done for many a century. They are among those people who claim to be representatives of gods, they know the wheat and are peoples who carry a civilization. We have compiled a comprehensive List of their kings, regardless of their distinction (unlike the Kalhu king's list, which lists only kings who are 'Kings of the Universe in the Assyro-Babylonian opinion).

The Mushaahu wandered along the desert pathways for a time immemorial, as do the people of Arabia or other barbarians. They did then come upon the banks of the river Hatipu (Nile) and settled along its banks as people do in many foreign lands whose cities were created not by the Great Gods. Whence settled, these peoples, did practice the ways of the wheat and worship the gods of their lands, inferior gods and trifling superstitions. As do the people who mimic the ways of the Lords of the Universe-- For the Great Gods hath gifted unto a single hand the sceptre of kingship; though doth the peoples across the surface of the Four Corners with their eyes doth dance and move as their superiors do and gather from the Great Gods, what has fallen upon them as rain upon the backs of the ibex.

Hence, we offer to the reader, for the sake of education of the lands of barbarians (Umman-manda, those many peoples from unknown or unworthy lands) a list of the Pir'uuh from its beginning until the day of now or its demise.'

(let us remind the reader, that the Akkadian literature often calls more 'civilized' humans something akin to 'humans, are you humans' while peoples whom they consider even lesser than this, could simply be called 'deer' or 'hordes of unknown entities'// this was perhaps the common opinion of the ruling caste in the more ancient times but in the time of the tl, it is more of a literary focus than a real opinion of the ruling caste)

Key note, the Kalhu codex, as did their predecessors, placed extreme importance on annual dates, and as such invent dates of monarchs for foreign kings, even when such do not exist

Dynasty I

Narmer 3097-3056 BCE
------
Udimu 2985-2943 BCE
Anedjib 2943-2931 BCE
Semerkhet 2931-2923 BCE
Qaah 2923-2889 BCE


Dynasty II

Hotepsekhemwy 2885-2870 BCE
Nebra 2870-2856 BCE
Nyntejr 2856-2810 BCE
Seth-Peribsen 2810-2762 BCE
Sekhemid-Perenmaat 2762-2724 BCE
Neferkara 2724-2699 BCE
Neferkasokar 2699-2691 BCE
-----
Khasekmwy 2673-2668 BCE

Dynasty III

Djoser 2668-2649 BCE
Sekhemkhet 2649-2643 BCE
Sanakht 2643-2637 BCE
Huni 2637-2613 BCE

Dynasty IV (Golden Age)

Sneferu 2613-2589 BCE
Khufu 2589-2566 BCE
Djedefre 2566-2558 BCE
Khafre 2558-2532 BCE
Menkaure 2532-2503 BCE
Shepsekaf 2503-2498 BCE

Dynasty V

Userkaf 2498-2491 BCE
Sahure 2490-2477 BCE
Neferirkare Kakai 2477-2467 BCE
Neferefre 2467-2458 BCE
----
Nyuserre-Ini 2544-2522 BCE
Menkhauer Kaiu 2522-2514 BCE
Djedkarre-Isesi 2514-2475 BCE
Unas 2475-2440 BCE

Dynasty VI after 100 years of interregnum

Teti 2345-2333 BCE
Usekare 2333-2332 BCE
Pepi I 2332-2288 BCE
Nemtyensaf I 2283-2278 BCE
Pepi II 2278-2184 (94 years on the throne, ascended at age 6!)


VII-X Dynasties disregarded by the Codex

XI Dynasty

Mentuhotep II 2060-2010 BCE
Mentuhotep III 2010-1998 BCE
Mentuhotep IV 1998-1990 BCE

XII Dynasty

Amenemhat I 1990-1962 BCE
Senusret I 1962-1926 BCE
Amenemhat II 1926-1895 BCE
Senusret II 1895-1878 BCE
Senusret III 1878-1860 BCE
Amenemhat III 1860-1815 BCE
Amenemhat IV 1815-1807 BCE

XIII-XVII dynasties disregarded by the Codex

XVIII Dynasty (Golden Age)

Ahmose I 1550-1527 BCE
Amenhotep I 1527-1520 BCE
Thutmose I 1520-1492 BCE
Thutmose II 1492-1479 BCE
Hatshepsut 1479-1458 BCE
Thutmose III 1458-1425 BCE
Amenhotep II 1425-1400 BCE
Thutmose IV 1400-1390 BCE
Amenhotep III 1390-1352 BCE
Amenhotep IV 1352-1336 BCE (Akhenaten to us// Assyrian records are unaware of his reign, only his name prior to change...)
Tutankhamun 1336-1324 BCE
------
Ay II 1324-1320 BCE

XIX Dynasty (Golden Age)

Ramses I 1292-1290 BCE
Seti I 1290-1279 BCE
Ramses II 1279-1213 BCE
Merenptah 1213-1203 BCE
Amenmesse 1203-1200 BCE
Seti II 1203-1197 BCE


XX Dynasty (Golden Age)

Setnakt 1190-1186 BCE
Ramses III 1186-1155 BCE
Ramses IV 1155-1149 BCE
Ramses V 1149-1145 BCE
Ramses VI 1145-1137 BCE
Ramses VII 1137-1130 BCE
Ramses IX 1130-1111 BCE
Ramses X 1111-1107 BCE
Ramses XI 1107-1077 BCE

XXI-XXIV dynasties disregarded by the Codex

XXV Dynasty (Nubian Dynasty)

Piye 730-714 BCE
Shebitku 714-705 BCE
Shabaka 705-694 BCE
Taharqa 694-664 BCE
Tantamani 664-653 BCE

XXVI Dynasty

Necho I 672-664 BCE
Psamtik I 653-610 BCE
Necho II 610-593 BCE
Psamtik II 593-582 BCE
Wahibre 582-578 BCE

XXVII Dynasty

Ahmose II 578-??? BCE
 
Last edited:
Ruler Compendium// For Hitalmti/Elam
'A river cuts its course from the south to the east, in the lowlands of the marsh and the high mountains of the east, doth the Elamtu reside. Their lands are of farming villages and fishermen across the rivers of their country which borders the Land of the Great Gods. They have a foreign tongue and foreign gods, yet have mimicked their masters in custom and in art. Surely they are a people with whom the Grace of the Gods has been granted, for being ever near the Land of their Masters.

Long did the people of Elamtu swim through the marshes. They did so, setting a net out unto the sea for a catch, surely they were of the people with whom the Gods granted a privilege after the Flood, for they soon made walls and temples in the names of their gods, inferior ones with whom they worship in the hill country and gift flowers to. Learning from those near them, did they learn kingship, for they tugged upon a chain of lordship and did have pretense of independence. Recalcitrant is a word fitting of the people of Elam, for they have forged for themselves a kingship based upon their city of Susa, they claim lordship over the river way and of the high mountain, they are but lords of small mounds, rebels to the justice of Shamash and from among those who hide from Assur.

Though, Elamtu, that land possessed many a men who claimed the title of king, not conferred to them by the Great Gods or that of the sole King Humane (Assyrian king). A student of the barbarians shouldst do well to know the lists of kings, for in times long past, did they numerate for us, these barbarian kings so that we may keep record in the name of the Great God Naboo.'

Key note, the Kalhu codex, as did their predecessors, placed extreme importance on annual dates, and as such invent dates of monarchs for foreign kings, even when such do not exist

I Dynasty (Awanids)

Luh-Ishshan I 2564-2559 BCE
Kur-Ishshak 2559-2549 BCE
Peli 2549-2511 BCE
Ukku-Tanhish 2511-2499 BCE
Hishutash 2499-2487 BCE
Shushun-Turana 2487-2474 BCE
Napi-Ilhush 2474-2429 BCE
Kiku-Sewi-Temti 2429-2389 BCE
Hishep-Ratep I 2389-2333 BCE
Luh-Ishshan II 2333-2325 BCE
Hishep-Ratep II 2325-2311 BCE
Emahsini 2311-2306 BCE
Helu I 2306-2275 BCE
Helu II 2275-2270 BCE
-------

II Dynasty (Shimashkis)

Simashki 2109-2093 BCE
Gir-Namme I 2093-2074 BCE
Tazitta I 2074-2042 BCE
Eparti I 2042-2033 BCE
Gir-Namme II 2033-2030 BCE
Tazitta II 2030-2028 BCE
----
Lurak-Luhhan 2028-2024 BCE
Hutran-Temti 2024-2019 BCE
Indattu-Inshushinak I 2019-1980 BCE
Indattu-Inshushinak II 1980-1975 BCE
Tan-Ruhurattir I 1975-1965 BCE
Indattu-Inshushinak III 1965-1944 BCE
Indattu-Napir 1944-1936 BCE
Indattu-Temti 1936-1911 BCE

III Dynasty (Itrukids)

Atta-Hushu 1894-1892 BCE
---
Tetep-Mada 1892-1890 BCE
Pala-Ishshan 1890-1872 BCE
Kuk-Sanit 1872-1866 BCE
Kuk-Kirwash 1866-1851 BCE
Tem-Sanit 1851-1825 BCE
Kuk-Nahunte 1825-1811 BCE
Kuk-Nashur II 1811-1796 BCE
Shirukduh 1796-1789 BCE
Shimut-Wartash II 1789-1774 BCE
Palar-Hupuk 1774-1765 BCE
Kuduzulush I 1765-1725 BCE
Kutir-Nahunte I 1725-1709 BCE
Ata-Meri-Halki 1709-1700 BCE
----
Tata II 1700-1684 BCE
Lila-Irtash 1684-1666 BCE
Tamti-Agun 1666-1661 BCE
Temti-Shilaha 1661-1658 BCE
----
Kuk-Nashur III 1658-1646 BCE
Temti-Ratash 1646-1627 BCE
Shimut Wartash III 1627-1603 BCE
Shirtuh 1603-1595 BCE
Kuduzulash II 1595-1540 BCE
----
Tan-Uli 1540-1536 BCE
Tamti-Halki 1536-1533 BCE
Kuk-Nashur IV 1533-1514 BCE
Kutik-Matalit 1514-1498 BCE

IV Dynasty (Kidunids)

Kiduni 1466-1435 BCE
Inshushinak-Sunkir-Nappir 1435-1414 BCE
Tan-Ruhuratir 1414-1397 BCE
Shalla 1397-1394 BCE
Temti-Ahar 1394-1366 BCE


V Dynasty (Idelhalkids) Golden Age

Humban-Numena I 1364-1355 BCE
Untan-Napirisha 1355-1338 BCE
Kidin-Hutran II 1338-1320 BCE
Pahir-Ishshan 1320-1287 BCE
Unpatar-Napirisha 1287-1250 BCE
Kidin-Hutran 1250-1214 BCE

VI Dynasty (Shutrukids) Golden Age

Hullutush-Inshushinak 1209-1192 BCE
Shutruk-Nahunte 1192-1153 BCE (height of Elam, Elamites rule Babylonia)
Kutir-Nahunte II 1153-1151 BCE
Shilhak-Inshushinak I 1151-1142 BCE
Hutelutush-Inshushinak 1142-1110 BCE
Hamru-Lakamar 1110-1100 BCE
Humban-Numena II 1100-1069 BCE
Shutruk-Nahunte II 1069-1041 BCE
Shutur-Nahunte I 1041-1009 BCE
-----
Akshir-Shimut I 1009-983 BCE
Akshir-Shimut II 983-977 BCE
Akshir-Shimut III 977-962 BCE
Kara-Indash 962-934 BCE

VII Dynasty

Humban-Tahrah 802-743 BCE
Humban-Nikash I 742-717 BCE
Shutur-Nahunte II 717-693 BCE
Kutir-Nahunte III 693-692 BCE
Humban-Numena III 692-687 BCE
Humban-Haltash 687-680 BCE
-----
Urtaku 680-664 BCE
Teuman 664-653 BCE
-----
Humban-Nikash II 653-651 BCE
Tamaritu I 651-649 BCE
Indabibi 649-648 BCE
Humban-Haltash 648-644 BCE
Tamaritu II 644-644 BCE
Umhuluma 644-642 BCE

VIII Dynasty (Kittinids)

Indattu-Inshushinak IV 640-633 BCE
Humban-Hapua I 633-631 BCE
Shutur-Nahunte III 631-622 BCE
Humban-Kittin I 622-594 BCE
Humban-Hapua II 594-593 BCE
Humban-Nikash III 593-591 BCE
-------

????
 
Last edited:
These King lists sure like emphasizing the fact that the Assyrians are the only real Monarchs in the world don't they. I notice though that they seem slightly more friendly to the existence of the pharaohs than the Elamite Kings. Is this due to the closeness of the Elamite Kings?
 
These King lists sure like emphasizing the fact that the Assyrians are the only real Monarchs in the world don't they. I notice though that they seem slightly more friendly to the existence of the pharaohs than the Elamite Kings. Is this due to the closeness of the Elamite Kings?

To Assyria at the time, Egypt still has a level of exotic gloss. Elam is extremely well known in Assyria and have historically been very integral to Akkadian territorial holdings. During the Akkadian empire, to the Assyrians, their genesis, Elam was the eastern province of the empire and as such is seen as an integral section of the ideal universal empire. Elamite peoples are also very nearly Mesopotamian, they are only a short distance from Babylon and many Elamite minorities exist in Sumer and Babylonia, such that Assyria appointed Elamite governors and mayors.
 
War of the Western Coalition pt.6
601 BCE/4152 AY

The Nubian Kingship

In the prior century, the ancient kingdoms of Nubia and Meroe had been united by a selection of rulers from the city of Napata in the region of Nubia. These kings would become known as Kings of Kush and woudl form a powerful power bloc to the south of the Egyptian XXIV dynasty in the north, which had failed to recover from its monumental decline after the Bronze Age Collapse. In fact, the state of Egypt was abysmal in terms of its power during this period. Often divided into many regional kings, Egypt was unable to influence in serious fashion the lands of Amurru (Syria) which it had once seen as integral sectors of the Egyptian imperial domain in 1200 BCE (400 years prior). As such, kings in lands once united, doth reunite under the banner of the past, made present.

In that vein, King Piye of Nubia-Meroe (752-721 BCE) invaded Egypt in the year 746 BCE and captured Thebes and established the XXV dynasty in Egypt in the year 744-743 BCE, placing a viceroy in Nubia and legitimizing various local Egyptian lords. In 721, Shabaka (Shabatka) succeeded his father Piye as Pharaoh, the first pharaoh of his dynasty who did not grasp the title by force. His reign would be one of consolidation of power; Shabaka proceeded by defeating the varied Egyptian princes in the Nile Delta, revoking their vassal status and gathering direct central government rule over the Delta. Following this, Shabaka deposed the Nubian viceroy in Napatu, who had become rebellious after the demise of Piye. Shabaka played a game of neutrality with Assyria under Sargon II and renounced his claims upon Amurru for Assyrian favors. Shabaka would rule until the same year as the demise of Sargon II and was succeeded by Shebitku, who would rule from 705-690 BCE. Shebitku experienced the decline of Assyro-Egyptian relations as the two combated each other under the reign of Assurhaddon over the region of Palestine. Previously, the position of Shabaka and Shebiktu allowed them to poke at Assyria due to the nature of Assyrian geopoltics. Assyria was harried on all sides near constantly, the primary foes being Elam, Urartu, Syrian rebellions, the Qedari Arabs and the Medes. Whilst Egypt and Phrygia, operating as allies, constructed themselves as supporters of Syrian rebels and as partners of mutual aid against the weakening Assyrian hegemony. However, the rise of the Cimmerian hordes in the 710s, led to the ultimate collapse of the Urartu-Assyrian rivalry in 707-706, Phrygia fell in 701 and Elam had all been reserved to itself after the fall of its Babylonian puppet state. Egypt became the primary foe against Assyria in the beginning of the Assyrian apogee (Sargon II until Assurbanipal was a period of continued Assyrian hegemony) with some meddling from Elam against Assyrian ruled Babylonia and Assyrian vassals in the Zagros.

Taharqa rose to the throne in 690 BCE, during the reign of Sennacherib, therein Assyria free from most of its threats, turned to assert Assyrian rule over Philstinia, primarily the cities of Ashdod and Gaza, but also to enforce Assyrian rule over Judah. Therein, the Jewish kingdom fearing for its autonomy sought protection from Egypt. As Sennacherib pushed southward, Egypt likewise attacked Assyria and was able to dislodge the Assyrian army from Judah and proceeded to usher a short period of Egyptian overlordship in Palestine, the first such period in centuries. Taharqa's luck would end with the reign of Assurhadon, who deposed his father, Sennacherib, invaded the Levant and attacked Egypt, gaining victory first at Ashdod and then at Gaza, before slaying the Egyptian general Sais and invading Egypt proper. Taharqa was driven from the delta south, where he was chased by Assyria which cut a swath through Egypt, ravaging city after city and sacking temples and taking idols of the Egyptian gods to be distributed as inferiors to the Assyrian Great Gods. Assyria completed this victory after a five year long campaign by taking Memphis in 671 as Taharqa fled to Nubia-Meroe. Assyria placed Necho I as vassal king of Egypt and erected a monument before taking the entire Egyptian royalty aside from those who escaped to Nubia to Assyria to be made into royal slaves. Taharqa who fled south in 672, returned to Thebes in 669 BCE, invading the realm of Necho I, the Assyrian vassal. Taharqa was able by 667 BCE, to restore completely his kingdom prior, before he was invaded by Assurbanipal who responded to the Egyptian resurgence by a bloody invasion and destruction of Thebes in 664 BCE, where Taharqa was slain. Assurbanipal placed Necho I as king of Egypt again, however, only nominally so, placing 25 other princes as lords over Egypt alongside Necho I.

The successor of Taharqa was Tanutamun, who rueld from 664-653 BCE, wherein he would attempt to restore control over Egypt, but was defeated by Necho I and the Egyptian vassals of Assyria. In 644, the ascension of Psamtik I, led to a disruption of the dynamic, as Psamtik I began a reunification process diplomatically of Egypt and while waging a constant war against the XXV Dynasty. Psamtik I, was able to diminish the authority of the older dynasty through even invasions of Nubia and also for isolating and annexing various princes. Tanutamun was succeeded by Altanersa, who ruled from 653-640 BCE and his successor, Snesaminisken (640-620 BCE), would see the fate of the Nubian kingdom begin to truly fade. Analamani, the current king, who ascended in 620 BCE, is at the crossroads of the heirs of the XXV dynasty, long had the Nubian kings been relegated and pushed south, doth they wish to push once more north? As Necho II falters against Assyria, is there potential for a Nubian reconquest and attempt at power?

Late 601 BCE and 600 BCE

Sinbanipal having solidified his capture of Aleppo without needing a siege of the city, ordered the Field Marshal Dugul-Naboo to invade Lydia with an army of some 29,800 warriors, while the main army of Sinbanipal and his Head Guard, Ipanqazzu invade the Levant and Egypt with an army of 46,000 warriors. Sinbanipal made haste, leading at the age of 15, he was protected primarily by his eunuchs and Ipanqazzu who led the main force directly.

Necho II had himself made it to Hamath by December 29, with an army of 34,948, with the majority of his losses made in the chaos after the route at Alagma. His arrival in Hamath was not met with fanfare, the locals fled in fear upon realization of the loss of the Egyptian king, rumors of rebellion and coup spread throughout the city in January of 600, before Necho II initiated a martial control of the city and proceeded to sack the city and take slaves before fleeing the city in January 19, as Sinbanipal arrived at the city some four days afterward. Necho II, ultimately decided his gains this far north were untenable with the Assyrian force, the unknown lands were also not keen on Egyptian hegemony if they themselves had to contribute to the fighting Assyria.


Sinbanipal placed a qepu in control over Hamath shortly before pushing south toward Damascus where Necho II had nearly reached, which remained under a collection of Egyptian and Greek soldiers under governor Aetius. Damascus was a strong city, but the devastation wrought by Necho's invasion had left much areas of defense lacking, yet Necho II nevertheless prepared a defense.

The Southern Front pt.1

Meanwhile, in Edom, the army of Puzur-Adad had crossed into Edomite lands and battled Kas-Malaka II (king of Edom) in the Jordan plains at several locations before Puzur-Adad gained many logistical victories as the local Edomite forces fled ever north and the Moabite king Yoshi-Dagon gained freedom to push Edomo-Egyptian forces in early 600. By February of 600, Puzur-Adad had captured most of Edom and had forced Kas-Malaka II to flee toward Beersheba where he sought refuge with Saibes, the Egyptian general in Beersheb and overseer in Gaza, Ashdod and Jerusalem. Ilu-Kiyah, the supposed king of Jerusalem had spent his time searching for the heir of Yoshi-Yahu, the prince Yahu-Ahaz for the past year, such that most of his efforts had been ineffective in securing Jewish support for Edom and its wars with the Southern Protectorate and Moab.

When Kas-Malaka II arrived in Beersheb, the Egyptian forces responded by rallying a force to block Puzur-Adad whilst chastising Kas-Malaka II for losing heart before a band of vagabonds such as these Arabs from Qedar and Nabtu. Saibes marched south alongside Ilu-Kiyah to engage Puzur-Adad which was crossing into Judah from Edom. Therein, Saibes was able to for two months stymie the Arab advance, as Puzur-Adad fled south into Edom avoiding direct conflict. Saibes, ever cautious, refused to invade Edom, and instead sent Kas-Malaka with a force of 3,000 warriors to retake his country.

"The foolish general of Egypt, the Saibes, sent Kas-Malaka II with an army to retake his country. Saibes foolishly held to the notion that Puzur-Adad had avoided their battle for any reason other than the tactical might of Naboo. Surely those warriors of Assyria do not flee, nor do they falter, they are likened to the hunter who tricks all the beasts of the land. Surely the people of Egypt are but creatures of simply minds, who fall prey to the net and are skewered by the spear whence entrapped." -Kalhu Codex

As Kas-Malaka II entered with his army, an Arabo-Assyrian cavalry force set upon them from behind trailing their movements before launching upon them as Kas-Malaka II made a dash back to Judah. Instead, Kas-Malaka II was decimated in the the northern quarter of Edom and the protectorate general Puzur-Adad was given the head of the king of Edom in August, as the Arab army moved north to launch a second attempt upon Judah.


First and Second Battle of Damascus

Arriving in Damascus, Necho II began to prepare a defense and counter strategy for Sinbanipal, which was ultimately not in time, for the Assyrian army, using faster methods of travel by camels and horse trains, was able to arrive only two days after Necho II, but with less than the full army. Necho II moved forth and engaged the enemy at the plains surrounding Damascus, wherein Egyptian forces fought a full four hours against the Assyrian forces, primarily made up of cavalry and lighter infantry as the main bulk of the Assyrian army was making haste behind. In this four hours, Egypt gained a resounding victory over the Assyrian expeditionary force, slaying over 2,000 warriors and reasserting Egyptian rule over the Dasmascene locale.

The Egyptian victory slowed Assyrian progress for the time being. Assyrian forces stationed themselves at a collection of towns between Baalbek and Damascus, where they gathered allies for a Phoencian army contingent to bolster their army. In September of 600, after a series of local conflicts between the two armies, Assyrian forces struck once more upon Damascus. This time, suffering from less and less grain and not enough resources this far north, as Assyria devastated the countryside, the Egyptian army was less prepared. At the second battle of Damascus, the Egyptian army faced an even larger Assyrian army on September 8. Fearing total defeat, Necho II fled once more after only a short engagement in the Second Battle of Damascus, Egyptian forces claimed a tactical victory, while Assyrian forces claimed to have routed Necho II again. Regardless, the casualties were minor on both sides as Necho II fled towards Jerusalem.

Southern Front pt.2

Puzur-Adad attacked in September 2 the land of Judah once more, as Saibes attempted to block his advance unopposed into the Levant. Meanwhile, Yoshi-Dagon invaded Israel the prior month, pillaging across the area, Yoshi-Dagon uncovered the hiding prince-Yahu-Ahaz and marched with the prince to retake Jerusalem. However, this march became less a march than a flight in fear as Necho II arrived within only a few days behind them after unexpectedly fleeing from Damascus.

As such, the Moabite army ensued a great fear, as the army took to running south without thought. The army broke into many different captains later in September as they arrived in the vicinity of Jerusalem. 13 captains were made and Yoshi-Dagon alongside his captive prince, fled across the battle lines to the east, leaving his soldiers with order to ravage the land and avoid the armies of Necho II. Despite the arrival of Necho II, the Arab forces, gaining immensely from morale and the loss of Edomite support among Egyptian forces, the Protectorate army defeated the Egyptian field army at Beersheba and occupied the city as Ilu-Kiyah stationed himself in Jerusalem. Saibes fled with his army to Gaza where he managed an area of high Egyptian support.

As Assyrian forces gained victories, Necho II arrived at Jerusalem, where lacking the time to gather food from the populace, which the countryside was currently filled with bandits, soldiers and brigands, allowed his army to loot the storehouses of Jerusalem once more. The city rapidly became a madhouse of soldiers taking from the storehouses and slaying any who attempted to restrain the Egyptian army in the city. Necho II after looting Jerusalem a second time, left Ilu-Kiyah in the city with a portion of his army, while Necho II made haste to Beersheba and southern Judah, wherein he began clearing out the Arab raiders across the area, restoring Jewish forts and frightening the Protectorate.

In December of that year, the Assyrian army, after restoring rule in Damascus, sending a contingent that restored Assyrian rule in Palmyra, gathering a Phoenician army, and ensuring Syrian control once more, arrived in the vicinity of Jerusalem in 599 BCE, to a a situation that was turning back in the favor of Egypt, as Necho II had retaken Beersheba and restored Egyptian rule over most of Judah, pushing the protectorate back into the desert fringes.

------

Hope this was a good quick update!
 
A good update. Having to re-sack an already sacked city might make things difficult for Necho with supplying his army. How advanced was logistics at the time I wonder?
 
A good update. Having to re-sack an already sacked city might make things difficult for Necho with supplying his army. How advanced was logistics at the time I wonder?

Depends on the power. Assyria could campaign very far due to many innovations. However, Egypt lacked many of these innovations, as I understand. Assyria could campaign the following distances:

As far south as modern Medina.
As far west through sea to Cyprus.
As far into Africa as Thebes.
As far north as the Halys River (west) and as far north as Colchis/Northern Georgia.
As Far East as Parthia, Drangiana and Hormuz.

These are the current records for Assyria, who was the most advanced in spatial movements of armies until the Middle Achaemenid empire.
 
Good update.

Assyria is ascendant.

Like people commented in this site, Egypt is really in a bad spot geographically vs Mesopotamian Central Empires like Assyria/Babylonia/Persia. Egypt needs to control the Levant and possibly Syria, in order to remain competitive against them. The Bronze Age collapse really did a number on Egypt, and unlike OTL, Assyria did not collapse.

I do wonder why the Egyptians never tried to expand to Arabia. Say, to Nabatea and Seba. Also, Lybia.

The Nubians are about to make their play.

I have a feeling that whatever is about to go down in Ionia is going to change the history of Greece substantially. AFAIK Greece of this time is already taking the form of the Greece we know from the Classical Era. Enter the Hellenes?
 
Good update.

Assyria is ascendant.

Like people commented in this site, Egypt is really in a bad spot geographically vs Mesopotamian Central Empires like Assyria/Babylonia/Persia. Egypt needs to control the Levant and possibly Syria, in order to remain competitive against them. The Bronze Age collapse really did a number on Egypt, and unlike OTL, Assyria did not collapse.

I do wonder why the Egyptians never tried to expand to Arabia. Say, to Nabatea and Seba. Also, Lybia.

The Nubians are about to make their play.

I have a feeling that whatever is about to go down in Ionia is going to change the history of Greece substantially. AFAIK Greece of this time is already taking the form of the Greece we know from the Classical Era. Enter the Hellenes?

Egypt did have Cyrene in a sort of vassal situation though they usually were good allies with each other. Regarding Arabia, Egypt until Necho II, never had a navy with the skill to transport troops across the Red Sea into Arabia so as to divert power therein. Further, the Qedar-Nabtu were quite strong relatively and only the Assyrians made headway against them, most critically in the regime prior to Sinsharishkun, under Assurbanipal. Saba/Sheba is too far south to be reached by Egypt unless they rule more lands to their west or south.

Admittedly, Egypt was powerful in the Bronze Age, but in my opinion, even in the Bronze Age, whence awakened after the decline of Mitanni, the Assyrian state was the strongest in the region. It was more unique in its agenda of imperialism than the other powers in the region and it held succession in her mind to the Sargonid Akkadian empire of old, which ruled the entire Mid East as the largest Bronze Age empire ever. Egypt on the otherhand was more insular, viewing the lands outside as chaotic, the New Kingdom expanded north so as to create buffers, (Protectorate to Subjugate the Foothills), rather than as part of a universal conquest scheme like the Assyrians. The Hittites ruled an empire of clients and vassals in what seems to be an economic alliance of some kind, Assyria at least ideologically promoted a notion of total domination of all creatures around it, it was unparalleled for the time in its agenda. Mario Liverani compares it to the Aztec Triple-Alliance and the Abbasid Islamic caliphate, whereas he notes that Egypt resembled more closely, China with its Middle Kingdom doctrine. That is, Egypt expanded so as to create more space for its empire center. While Assyria expanded as part of a cultural-religious mission to subjugate all things and to cull dangerous elements near them.
 
War of the Western Coalition pt.7
599 BCE/ 4154 AY

State of Affairs 599 BCE

Assyria's arrival in Jerusalem in 599 BCE, was to a landscape where Egypt had made a short term recovery. Namely, Egypt had re-secured Judah, frightened Yoshi-Dagon of Moab and defeated Puzur-Adad of the Protectorate (Southern) and drove him back into Edom. Necho II in a relatively stronger position, could not though seek peace and surrender his gains nor would Assyria accept any terms that did not include massive loot and payments to the treasury. Assyria however, cannot despite the position of Necho II, unable to make peace, will not simply be able to push through Judah without a fairly long siege and as such, Assyria did not press its advance after Damascus, rather, gathering reinforcements from Syria and Phoenicia, the Assyrians gathered thousands of infantry so as to increase their siege capability for the coming drawn out war in Judah and then distribute these foot soldiers across the recently recaptured lands as garrison before leading the primary force into Egypt to loot, pillage and destroy. This primary force would be the primary host of Assyria's king and would distribute retribution unto the land of Egypt.

"The Great King came upon Jerusalem, held by the camp follower, Necho II and his host of mongrels. He led an army of 45,000, armed and prepared for a siege, Lord Assur had led the charge surely, he was the ram and the hand that broke the gates of all cities. Look to Assur, for he is the God of victory and the Great King came to make amends for the land of his God had been threatened. Threats of all levels are treated with the flaying of skin, the trial of fire and the fury of a superior mace. Assur has rose the spear, Ninurta hears the call, He (!) strode forward saying:

'Behold ye denizen of deception, thine land of Egypt! The Great God Ninurta is I, a Man of War! Hark, for He hath entered the midst among a cloud of blood and veiled in the golden armor of the heavens with whom no man may touch! It is I, who will do battle with thee, the pillar of the Gods has stepped forward at the head of a host. Doth thine fear me? Doth your skin shrivel and your teeth clasp the tongue whence in the presence of the radiant aura of doom? Shall you fear not the crashing blow, yet fear for my Brothers and Sisters are eternal and they shall torment you and your family with curses. Shall we remind thee, that the Great Gods are Us, who lead man into bondage should they treat with the evil eye or make amends with Our enemies. Cursed is you, you shall taste the dirt and become flayed for Brother Nergal and your people shall be made into asses upon which the chosen, shall ride and you shall wait upon those whom we choose. Only whence you submit in fealty and slay yourselves, shall you be free. Listen not to your elected master or your gods, they will all be servile before us. Take your head for the sake of the Great Gods and may we bestow favor upon your family!'

Quivered in fear, the Egyptian force lost heart as the Great King did come. Verily, they are a most triumphant host! Those faces of Egypt, most disgusting and savage, doth they wear no shoes and cover themselves not in armor, may they become ashamed as we carry their women, children and men naked through the desert as lambs to the market. Let them know submission as their items are made for Assur and the gods they adhere to, become maids and servants in the temples of the Lords of Existence." -Kalhu Codex propaganda piece

As such, Sinbanipal and his army arrived at Jerusalem and was shortly joined by Yoshi-Ahaz, the heir to the throne of Judah. Yoshi-Ahaz upon entry into the Assyrian camp some 5 km from Jerusalem, arrived with the qepu of Judah who had hid him among the villages of Galilee and an envoy from Moab (under king Yoshi-Dagon, vassal of Assyria) describing in detail the events up till now. Yoshi-Ahaz was greeted by a stern guard of Assyrian guards:

"The King of Judah and true heir of the People of Israel, was led to the camp of Assyria. Guards looked upon him with the stern disposition of an errand boy. Most harshly doth all under Assyria; treated with a strong hand, for Assyria views other rulers in the view of strictness, they recognize Israel as servants and tools, though Hashem knows the best and protects our king even among the rule of the ritually unclean. Grasping ahold of the King of Israel, they did lead him to the midst of the young king, Sinbanipal and his generals, who sat upon a great golden chair encrusted with amber, rubies and images of idols of their lamassu common to the lands of the east. Sinbanipal held in his right hand a scepter and in his left a whip with golden embroidery. His legs were donning boots of orange and red, his clothing was multi-tiered and complex; of a red, orange and black color and around his neck was an assortment of golden jewelry from the lands of the north. His arms were decorated with jewelry of gold, with amber placed in sockets; in his ears was likewise rings of gold. His headpiece was a match to his outfit, he was a man who dressed as if he was to receive reception, not a man at war." -The chronicle of the later Jewish historian, Efra-Ayim (will be discussed much later)

Yoshi-Ahaz was led into the midst of Sinbanipal under strict guards, who held him tightly at his upper arms. They pushed him into the tent of the Great king, where the qepu whispered into his ears to perform submission and prostration, which was to be done a total of three times upon which his face was to touch the ground twice and his entire body touch the ground once. Yoshi-Ahaz performed these and then was ordered by the eunuch attendant of Sinbanipal to give accounts and speak his words of supplication. Yoshi-Ahaz proceeded to give submission and of the trials that befell him and his father who was placed upon a pike outside of the city and of his flight to a village where he had to live as a commoner for the past 7 years deprived of his birthright as Egypt placed a false-king Ilu-Kiyah as king of Judah, who he claimed, had intentions to restore the northern kingdom to Jewish rule, depriving Assyria of its lands.

Sinbanipal thus declared speaking as he pleased:

'I have heard your words and am disheartened as to your treatment. Rest assured, petty king, those who are loyal to the King of the Universe, even if their family is slain by the impious or they lose all of their wealth; verily, will I and my successors remember the devotion to the masters that your father gave and yourself, for you have lost your wealth and been shamed in the name of our Kingdom. May you be pleased, for we will place you upon the throne of Judah.'

Then striding forward, the eunuch at attend, spoke with a louder voice in a formalized Akkadian, resembling Old Akkadian of bygone eras:

'The King of the Universe hath spoke, the Representative of the great Gods and their mace upon which to smite the Lands of impiety is of finalized speech. We shall repeat to thine of poor function, the words of the Ideal Master, the Holy Progeny.... (proceed to repeat the words of Sinbanipal in louder and more archaic Akkadian).... You have heard, the Royal words, might you speak no more (to the visitors), seek rest for the King wishes his subjects to be of sound mind whence the morning comes.'

Regardless, during January, Assyria began its siege and assault upon Jerusalem

Meanwhile, in Tabal, the army of Dugul-Naboo recpatured most of the mountain fortresses in 600 BCE, securing these locales, his army followed Sadyattes into Cappadocia capturing various villages and townships including Ankuwa and other the ancient land of Hatti. Sadyattes crossed the Halys river in late 600 and made haste to Lydia. Dugul-Naboo crossed the river in 599 and placed a flag upon the shore on the other side declaring great victory for his army, before marching west with the guides of Greek and Cimmerian warriors among him.

Sadyattes fearing his position, decided to turn and do battle with Dugul-Naboo where they met at Gordium in the hill country for battle. There, Dugul-Naboo gained an inconclusive victory, but the substance of the battle, simply allowed Sadyattes to flee to the city of Gordium and garrison the city, gaining a tactical victory. The army of Sadyattes was bolstered by new Anatolian levies, who proceeded to cut Assyrian supply lines and harass the Assyrian force.

Dugul-Naboo in response would spend late 599-598 looting across eastern Phrygia and taking great numbers of slaves before marching back across the Halys in middle 598 BCE and marching to Ankuwa, began to create an administration there across from the Halys. Sadyattes had survived with his life, but his throne was increasingly in danger in Sardis where various court nobles began to speak of supporting his son Alyattes for the new king role. Dugul-Naboo thus was able to begin the creation of what in his mind, was his new avenue for power.... an eventual Northern Protectorate, which he could monopolize for his family.

Gaudama I passed away in the year 599 after having united most of Media under a revived kingdom of Media. He was succeeded by Gaudama II, who made a detente with Humban-Kittin I of Elam, who though keeping Tukulti-Ishtar under his protection, agreed to not support a restored Eastern Protectorate after the Gaudamids of Media who had restored much power in the recent years, proved their prowess by defeating the Elamo-Gambulu army at Ectbatana and along the Karun river. The Eastern Protectorate was fading from memory just as soon as it had been created and the defeated power of Media was reunited and empowered aside from a small Medo-Assyrian state in the Gilan region of Hyrcania which resisted the Gaudamid rule.

------

Assyria Smites Egypt

Sinbanipal began the siege of Jerusalem in 599 BCE, using the heir, Yoshi-Ahaz, mounted on a fine Scythian steed, he sent the king at the front to call out to the people and seek to find return. The people the next day rebelled against the Egyptian puppet and Ilu-Kiuyah struggled within the city with his Egyptian soldiers to control the situation. A struggle occurred in the Temple of Solomon, where the priesthood supported the riots and declared the return of the true king was supported by God and by a vision gifted to a prophet in the city named Nahum. This Nahum called out as a populist like figure and pleaded the people of Jerusalem to riot, resist and dethrone Ilu-Kiyah and regain the favor of God. Spreading riots ensued as people already looted by Egyptian soldiers, took to arms without fear for they had already lost much. The internal division allowed Assyrian forces to surge into the city after only a single month with only a minor force as the main force traveled to Beersheba where they engaged the Egyptian forces under Necho II who withstood the attacks but nevertheless fled to Philistinia where the populace was loyal and began to make mention of peace to Ipanqazzu, who promptly rejected the terms dubbed the Ashdod proposition.

Jerusalem's fall resulted in Ilu-Kiyeh's capture and the Assyrian forces proceeded to take his body and flay him alive tied to a pole outside Jerusalem.

"Ilu-Kiyeh was taken prisoner by the Great King, who devastated his force and with a strong hand, did crumble the transgressors. He, the Grandiose King, made a march tot he temple with the lord of the city, Yoshi-Ahaz, there the Great King stood upon the steps of the temple and made an offering the the God Adad, with whom he had been informed by his advisers, that said city's local god was the Great God Adad. Sinbanipal assured the subjugated lord, that he was the king of the city and declared that he shall give a donation to the city for its devotion, which shall be to construct a great pillar of victory, which shall declare the might of Adad. For the rebel, Ilu-Kiyeh, he was taken to the outer limits, stripped of his clothing, tied upon a stake and with the knife of Nergal, his skin was confiscated. His body then devoid of its skin, was burned as an offering of Nergal. The skin of the rebel was made appeared upon a great lift placed before the city of Jerusalem as reminder. Hundreds of Egyptians were captured by the Great King, those of the captains, were placed outside the city and watched alongside their soldiers the cutting of skin. The soldiers who were of lower rank, were then informed, of the command of the ideal masters: they were to with a club, beat their captains to death outside the city, any soldier who refused, would be flayed alive. These captains were beaten to death and their bodies thrown into a small ditch created by the lower soldiers and the pit was set ablaze for the God Nergal who burns all things which are evil. These lower soldiers were thus taken into bondage, their arms twisted into a knot behind their back and tied. Stripped of their clothing, they were marched naked, barefoot and shamed to be led to Assyria and devoted to the Great Gods. Fear the Great Gods and their appointed mouthpiece, the Great King, lest you come upon sure destruction."

Sinbanipal thus in middle of 599, attacked Philsitinia which resisted the Assyrian occupation. Gaza, Ashdod and Ashkalon were defended by Necho II and Saibes, all of whom had distributed their forces. At Ashdod, the Egyptian army fought fiercely alongside the Philistine militia. One Philistinian even pouncing upon the wall challenged all Assyrian warriors who may face him. Waiting for a return, an Assyrian warrior clamored to face the Philistine; the two met upon the front of the city gates as the warrior was let down by a rope. The duel turned in favor of the Philsitinian warrior who through a the swiftness and eagerness of a young hand, was able to slash the enemy who had dropped his armor for the duel. After gaining his victory, the young brave stood victoriously, before a thunder of arrows was unleashed upon him, striking him in six places.

"Assur respects not the duels and games of the lesser creatures. The Great Gods decree only victory, matters not how an enemy is slain and for every one of us slain, so too shall they be brought low. No honor is greater than victory for the sake of the Great Gods. Our mission is the dominance over others and their foolish rites, respect only those whose rites are mandated by the Gods; those not of us, breach their rites." -Kalhu Codex, nullifying this famous event, essentially stating, if Assyria loses a duel, simply fire arrows upon the enemy

The warriors of Ashdod began to create a chant after this horrendous display of honor:

'Take heart Warriors of the Land and their allies. Beat thine swords into a call of war, remember the quick blade of our scorn. Fear not the arrows, powerful acts preserves us in dark valleys. God Baal shall resound our blade, our honor shall be our horn.'

For the entire year of 598 and early 597, the Philistinian and Egyptian armies proceeded to block the Assyrians. At Gaza, a short bridge allowed the Assyrians into the city, but this was protected by a group of warriors from Abyssinia who accordingly, described as those whose skin resembled ebony, were chained together, carrying large swords, spears and axes, proceeded to block the Assyrian force from entering. This held for several days as the Assyrian force had struggled to get to this place and were denied. Only whence a great cavalry charge was sent upon them did the chain locked warriors begin to step back, as the lancers retreated and permitted the Assyrian heavy infantry to push forward and cut past the breaking chain line which was then hurried in the back by Egyptian soldiers with long pikes imported from Europe who stopped the Assyrian advance once more. Arrow fire from Assyria and the Gazan warriors was then exchanged before the city of Gaza broke the bridge by fire. The next year, in early 597, Assyria calling greater soldiers was able to with force of arrow fire and soldiers breaching the tight moat and ditch to create a line of protection, built a rapid bridge which allowed the Assyrian army to strike Gaza closely and scale the walls and captured the city in July of 597. The prior month, Ashkelon fell as Necho II moved south. In Ashdod, Saibes was slain while battling the Assyrian forces in the city. The fall of the major Philstine cities, led to Necho II finally fleeing into the Sinai and hurrying towards Egypt. Assyria was slow to follow.

Following the victory in Philistine, a great destruction and deportation was to be enacted upon the populace of Philistinia, which shall be covered in the next update! As we see, the Jewish people have been spared of destruction and the destruction is to be given to their neighbors, the allies of Egypt, the Philistines, this of course has massive effect upon the Levant...
 
Last edited:
Court Reform of 598 BCE
During the reign of Sinsharishkun, in 605 BCE, the Great King ordered an appendix made and a reform of court activities and custom. A further codification was to be made and one that befit the placement of the Great King as King of the Universe. This order was finished in 598 BCE during the reign of Sinbanipal in the city of Kalhu and also in the city of Babylon where correspondence was made. Ultimately the appendix was unveiled in 598 BCE in Babylon, though many of its reforms were already used in the regime of Sinsharishkun and Sinbanipal. The major reforms of the court were as such:

1. Whence greeted by foreign kings and rulers, the foreigner is to be guarded at all times by Assyrian guardsmen.

2. Foreign rulers when possible, shall be required to wait approximately 2 hours before a meeting is made. Their waiting period is to be at guard by four warriors on each side of the compass of the person or envoy. This guard period shall always be 2 hours unless the Great King orders exception or an omen comes to inform us of its necessity to be waved.

3. There must always be with the king, a head attendant. For this role, a set of ten attendants shall be created who are to be versed in correct grammar and knowledgeable of the enlightened customs.

4. A system of loud speech in archaic Akkadian grammar is to be spoken by the attendants for announcements. Keys to the sound of voice and the pronouncement of words shall be key.

5. After the waiting period of 2 hours is complete or otherwise waved, the attendant may call the envoy or ruler. This call shall be presented as such, in traditional archaic Akkadian:

-Calling out loudly, say: 'Come hither to the Great King; verily those who patiently wait, are rewarded manifold'
-Declare then as they proceed into the midst: The year as of current, the month and under which Great God, the current Great King, his era name and the prior regnal year.
-Order him to prostrate and to enter a posture that is conducive to his place.
-Prostration is performed as follows, if the person knows not how, he shall be instructed by the guards during the 2 hour waiting period; beginning with a bow, the man proceeds to bow three times then he must go to his knees and touch his head upon the floor; then he must after rising his head, proceed to place his entire body flat across the floor and stay in this position until told to rise. The king may tell him to assume any position that he pleases, even if that is laid flat.
-The attendant may not order him to rise, only the Great King may do so and at his leisure.
-Whence the Great King gives his order to rise or says nothing, the attendant repeats the order or if no order is given, the attendant says loudly and clearly: 'The Great King hath indicated for thine to remain as you are at current. Patiently wait upon his grandiose words.'

6. The attendant shall upon the arrival of the envoy to the king's midst (and prostration), must then proceed to give an account, this account should include:

-A praise of the Great Gods
-A praise of the Great King
-An admission of the servitude of the people of Mesopotamia to the Great Gods (as this appendix was created by Babylonian subjects, it exemplifies Mesopotamian exceptionalism, rather than Assyrian)
-An explanation of the speaker, that the speaker is the 'Mouthpiece of the Great King' and is simply a vehicle of communing
-Then the attendant steps back and allows the Great King to speak.
-After the King has spoken, the attendant will then step forward and repeat the final words of the Great King, in a loud voice and in Old Akkadian and then order the envoy to seek rest or to leave and await the call.

7. When entering a city officially, the attendant in same voice shall make proclamation of such.

8. When entering any building aside from temples to the Great Gods, the attendant shall enter first and proclaim the entry. Say, 'The Great King proceeds to enter the midst. Prepare to enter a posture conducive to submission, we greet those who are upon friendly terms.'

9. When the Great King makes proclamations and the attendant is able to be near, he shall repeat the order, lest times force this to be not done or the Great King wishes the attendant to not repeat.

10. Attendants shall be managed by the Head Eunuch when among the King's travelling group and when within the temple, are managed by the Cup-Bearer.
 
Nice upgrades!
Is there any reason to have these changes in the protocol?

Yes, the main point that we can draw, is that Sinsharishkun had started a period whereby attendants were created who assumed a non-militaristic role and a sustained non-military bureaucracy. Further, the new codes were simply an increase of what had already existed in Assyrian court life, especially in regards to foreign envoys and rulers. This simply sets a standard for these points and increases many aspects of what had existed prior. Creating an eternal division between the person intending to meet the Great King and the Great King.

Regarding other points, such as the need to have these speeches in Archaic grammar, this is an attempt at restoration of Akkadian high culture in the face of Aramaic and newer forms of Akkadian. Further, it offers an area of privilege to the highly educated Assyro-Babylonian scribal class who due to their decades of rigorous training, have mastery over Old Akkadian and over Sumerian. This scribal class was made ascendant with the reign of Sinsharishkun's reign and his era of reform in governmental bodies, beginning at Kalhu and then later rulings by him in the later part of his regime, such as this reform of courtly life, which he placed at the feet of scribes within Babylon primarily to complete and keep record of such things;not included within the Kalhu Codex.
 
Top