The Bitter Borough: A TL of an Early Consolidation of New York City

Introduction and POD
The Bitter Borough
Of Treason and Power
Hi folks! I'm still relatively new to this community and new to alternate history, although I've lurked for some time. I finally got the courage to work on an alternate history scenario of my own. Since this year marks 125 years since the creation of Greater New York, it's as good as any time to explore "what if?"

This timeline focuses on exploring a world where the City of "Greater New York" consolidates early, during the American Civil War. In our timeline, this took place on January 1, 1898, with referendums in areas such as Richmond County (Staten Island), Brooklyn, the three western-most towns of Queens County, and the towns of East Chester and Westchester (in the Bronx).

The point of divergence is in 1861. Mayor Fernando Wood, part of the Tammany Hall political machine and a pro-Southerner, proposed to the New York Common Council in January 1861 that New York City should secede from the United States and become a "free city", so that New York could continue to freely trade cotton produced by the Southern states. In our timeline, this suggestion was rejected, and when the South fired the first shots at Fort Sumter, the city eventually proved to be a bastion of Union support, its historically strong ties with the South notwithstanding.

In this timeline, they actually try to act upon their suggestion for New York City to secede from the United States to become a “free city.” This effort falters rather quickly, as the suggestion is only acted upon after the Confederacy fires the first shots in the American Civil War. New York Governor Edwin Morgan, a Republican, called in the state militia to restore order in New York City. This, as a side effect, effectively kills off Tammany Hall as a viable political organization. It should also be noted that the move does not affect the course of the American Civil War: the Union does win the war.

With New York's prestige stained by its fling with secessionism, Manhattan is punished by being stripped of a significant amount of its political power, and part of that includes the consolidation of as much pro-Union turf into the city. This has knock-on effects on how the city evolves. While the New York area remained a draw for immigrants arriving on America's shores seeking opportunity, there was a very studious separation between "Rebel City" and its environs. Meanwhile, its neighbor across the East River, Brooklyn, has become the center of power within the city, but whereas the state solved one problem, it created another...

This is a timeline that will be explored through a variety of media, primarily news articles and Wikipedia articles. My goal is to explore this alternate timeline through a uniquely New York perspective. You will notice entirely new institutions, some institutions that existed in our timeline in different forms, and some that will never be established.
 
Last edited:
Wow, I'll be watching this with a lot of interest! I've never seen a city-focused TL before, and NYC seems like a perfect city for basing a TL on
 
The New York City Subway
An Overview of Rapid Transit in New York

It is no surprise that most residents within the Three Boroughs of Manhattan, the Bronx, and Brooklyn get around a lot. They are assisted in that task with perhaps the most interesting rapid transit system in an urban area, as New York and Brooklyn historically operated their own rapid transit systems. The two systems interface about as well as you'd expect for a system glued together from two systems built in two cities with such distinctly different identities.

Every day, hundreds of thousands of commuters use the lines of the New York City Subway, split into the Western and Eastern Divisions. The Western Division comprises the subways within Manhattan and the Bronx, while the Eastern Division is the entirety of what was once Brooklyn Rapid Transit. And the ever fragile thread that ties it all together, the Brooklyn-Manhattan Connecting Line (popularly known as the Brooklyn Connector or just the Connection) [1], is relied upon in some way by almost every resident, whether it's a Sheepshead Bay resident going to work for a tech company in SoHo, or a Manhattanite visiting a friend in a coffee shop in Park Slope, this is the line that makes it all possible.

The Western Division contains five lines: the Second Avenue Line, the Lexington Avenue Line, the Broadway Line, the Seventh Avenue Line, and the Eighth Avenue Line. These lines generally run from a terminal in Lower Manhattan towards Upper Manhattan and the Bronx, and the Manhattan Subway was key in the urbanization of the city of New York.

The Eastern Division has many sprawling subway lines, many of which terminate at the Brooklyn Commons station in Downtown Brooklyn. It is the Eastern Division's Myrtle Avenue/Airport Line that has the elusive direct link to Floyd Bennett New York Brooklyn International Airport [2], the busiest airport for international air travel in North America and the New York area's busiest airport. Its lines include the Fourth Avenue (and its Culver and New Utrecht Branches), Flatbush, Canarsie (and its Williamsburg Branch), Fulton Street, Eastern Parkway, Greenpoint, Jamaica, and Myrtle Avenue/Airport Lines [3], the Eastern Division provides an extensive, although not comprehensive, connection to many neighborhoods within the borough, like its neighbor on the island of Manhattan.

Other, smaller rapid transit and light rail systems exist, but they will be covered in due time.

[1] Watch out for a post soon with details about this line, but the idea for this line was based on a real proposal for the New York City Subway, specifically the lines coming off OTL's Manhattan Bridge from the BMT's Fourth Avenue and Brighton Lines. Luckily, instead one of the two sets of tracks on the bridge were connected to the express tracks of the BMT Broadway Line. The other was connected to the BMT Nassau Street Line (the portion of the current-day J/Z in Manhattan) until the Chrystie Street Connection opened in 1967. In this timeline, you can forget about the idea of the Chrystie Street Connection, let alone any interoperability between the Brooklyn and Manhattan subways - it's a political nonstarter. That post will also help paint a picture of what Brooklyn-Manhattan relations look like in the "present day", of sorts.
[2] In this timeline, the airport is not built on Barren Island. Watch out for a future post for more information on the airport!
[3] Many of these are based on real New York City Subway lines, because most of them are very obvious candidates for transit corridors. The details of each line do vary (for instance, most of the Brooklyn lines terminate in Downtown Brooklyn), but there are close OTL equivalents.
 
Last edited:
The Brooklyn-Manhattan Connecting Line
Disclaimer: I posted the original version of this article to /r/AlternateHistory, which can be found here, however this post is the canonical version. I've corrected some grammar issues and improved the quality of the subway bullet.

In addition, I will be rewriting this article to cover the recent changes in the timeline. Directionally, it remains accurate, but there are some changes that I need to make.


The Brooklyn-Manhattan Connecting Line is the beating heart of the Metroplex, but it has seen better days. As the Metroplex enters its third major transit crisis, there is real hunger for change. According to the Brooklyn Transit Authority, over $800 million of repairs are needed to rehabilitate the line to a state of good repair, and the urgency of these long-deferred repairs grow with each passing day.

Of course, it goes without saying that transfers from or to the Manhattan Subway on the Brooklyn Connector Line are not free. If there's one thing the Greater New York Transit Authority and the Brooklyn Transit Authority agree on, it's that the right to be able to nickel-and-dime commuters shall never be infringed on.

ItsRCzx.png
 
Last edited:
Hello folks! I'm working on an update after doing a bit more research. Some of this timeline will be retconned, but I promise that it'll result in a much more interesting scenario.

Look out for my next post discussing the Long Island Water Wars, which will help provide a transition to the new timeline.
 
The Long Island Water Wars
If there is one attribute that the Cities of New York and Brooklyn shared, it is that they were very, very thirsty, and they didn’t have nearly enough water around them to go around. Manhattan is surrounded entirely by tidal water and never had much natural water to begin with. Brooklyn was not in much of a better spot.

Before 1840, New York City relied primarily on groundwater, having abandoned Collect Pond as it became unsanitary. It was that pivotal year when New York would establish its first water connection outside of the city by damming the Croton River and carrying its water south via the Croton Aqueduct, guaranteeing the growing city the water supply it needed.

Meanwhile, Brooklyn was stretching the limits of what groundwater it could extract, and needed to search further afield. Brooklyn, like its neighbor to the west, was also industrializing. Thus, Brooklyn started going eastwards to find water supplies, drilling wells in southern Queens County on the spine of the Long Island moraine, and even reaching out as far as the border with Suffolk County. All this water was pumped and moved to the Brooklyn Water Works and the Ridgewood Reservoir, where the water was then distributed to quench the thirst of the ever growing city.

This massive pumping of water by the City, and later Borough, of Brooklyn did not go unnoticed by the farmers and oystermen of Queens and Suffolk Counties, who began to suffer from the environmental impacts of Brooklyn’s unquenchable thirst, with streams drying up and stagnant water becoming more common. Indeed, the situation did not change when the consolidation of the Six Boroughs took place in 1861. But the situation would only escalate into violence starting in 1899, when the Borough of Brooklyn first tapped the aquifer underneath the Pine Barrens of eastern Long Island. From there onwards, the Long Island Water Wars became hot, with farmers regularly destroying or sabotaging wells or aqueduct infrastructure around the island.

The Long Island Water Wars would continue even after the New York Water Tunnel No. 2 was built in 1936, as the existing Long Island water infrastructure continued to serve the borough, although it did put a lull in active sabotage as pumping from Long Island was reduced (although the dreaded Pine Barrens well was not yet turned off) and replaced with water from the Croton and Catskill Aqueducts. Once the Delaware Aqueduct opened in 1950, the output of the pumps on Long Island finally slowed to a trickle, and then were turned off in 1967.

Tactics pioneered during the Long Island Water Wars by the farmers and oystermen who resisted Brooklyn’s ever-growing quench galvanized opposition elsewhere. Notably, Los Angeles, which was eyeing the Owens Valley for water to support the growth of the city, had to abandon its plans for a massive aqueduct after the farmers of Owens Valley organized to keep the city out, forcing Los Angeles to tap the Mono Valley instead, leading to the destruction of Mono Lake.

Long Island, however, has never recovered from the Water Wars. Most of the island remains rural; there are some towns, primarily those closest to Brooklyn such as Jamaica that receive water from the New York City water supply system. The Long Island oyster industry would not begin to recover until the early 2000s, and agriculture on the island was permanently stunted. Suburbanization would not reach deep on the island due to the lack of adequate water supplies and the high cost of extending water service from New York City. Today, the suburbs of New York are concentrated in Westchester, Orange, Newtown, and Staten Island in New York, and Hudson, Bergen and Essex Counties in New Jersey. Queens and Suffolk Counties would never be able to make a lasting impact on the development of the New York metropolitan area. If only Brooklyn had not been so stubborn, perhaps Long Island would look very different today.
 
Last edited:
My next post will discuss Fernando Wood over his 3 terms as Mayor of New York, up until he is removed from office as mayor. After that, I will discuss the role Manhattan played in the American Civil War, and contrast it with Brooklyn.
 
Fernando Wood: The Would-Be Imperial Mayor of the Free City?
Fernando Wood: The Would-Be Imperial Mayor of the Free City?
Fernando Wood was, if nothing, ambitious. Born to a family of poor Philadelphia Quakers, he had commenced his business career in the 1830s with a string of failed businesses, including a tobacconist’s shop in downtown Manhattan, and served an somewhat uneventful term in Congress from 1841 to 1843. Returning to New York, he became a shipping merchant, and profited from the Gold Rush trade. He used those profits to speculate in land, and reinvested those profits into investments in banks, railroads, and insurance companies. By the end of the 1850s, he had become a millionaire. He was also a product of the powerful Tammany Hall political machine, whose ranks he scaled quickly. He was also deeply sympathetic to the South.

He first ran for mayor in 1850, but his bid faltered, in part due to allegations of dishonesty in his business dealings. His 1854 bid, however, succeeded, with strong support especially in working-class Irish districts, but his political enemies still controlled the Common Council. He initially seemed to be a harbinger of evil to the city, but on his inauguration day, he announced a set of reformist-minded programs. He wanted frugal government and public order above all, with the mayor’s office at the apex. Some of he programs he sought to uptake included a crackdown on prostitution, enforcement of Sunday closing laws, cleaning the streets, new docks, metering and expanding the Croton water system, uptown development, a brand new City Hall, a full-size Central Park, and unifying the police department.

However, it became apparent to his skeptics that his approach to the mayor’s office was imperial in nature, especially when it came to his attempt to rewrite the city charter and seize control over the city police department. Wood was also not completely sincere with his crusade against vice. If you voted the right way, your saloon could remain open on Sunday. Brothels were left alone, the seedier gambling dens were busted but the fashionable establishments stayed open, and he tried to monopolize patronage. On top of this, he enhanced the power of the substantial Irish immigrant community in the city, appointing them to plum policemen positions, and strong-armed voters at the polls, leading to fears that he had imported Napoleonic tactics to America. But what alarmed his skeptics most of all is, as an economic panic set in during 1854 and 1855, Wood called for supporting the unemployed with assistance and public jobs.

Wood pressed on with his reform program, and when opponents sought to curtail his program, he was able to call upon the wealthy to push back, but he could never secure the full powers he sought, leading him to rely on private interests for some of his pet projects that couldn't win the support of the Common Council. While he won re-election solidly in 1856, the nascent Republican Party also secured control of the governor’s mansion and the state legislature, and they were determined to rein in the mayor.



1857 was a year of bad news for the mayor. First, a set of rulings issued by the New York Court of Appeals that stated city property was held entirely in the trust of the public, and so the corporation of Manhattan had no authority other than whatever powers Albany saw fit to provide the city. The state legislature immediately declared its intent to interfere in Manhattan’s internal affairs, and soon after forced a new city charter. The changes weakened the city’s Common Council, forced Fernando Wood to stand for re-election a year early, and wrested control over 3/4ths of the city’s budget into Albany’s hands. Further, in April 1857, Republicans passed a Liquor Excise Law which imposed new restrictions on saloons, paired with a Metropolitan Police Act that removed control over the policemen in New York, Westchester, Richmond, and Kings Counties to a new state agency, the Metropolitan Police Commission, controlled by Republicans. Furthermore, they seized control of the election machinery in New York City and Brooklyn. This produced outrage, and Mayor Wood quickly reacted by re-establishing New York’s police department. Chaos ensued as two different police departments claimed the authority to patrol the city. Policemen chose one side or the other, with the state agency preferred by Anglos and the new city department preferred by the Irish. The conflicting forces promoted lawlessness. One climax came when the Metropolitan Police Commission sought to serve an arrest warrant on Mayor Wood; they were resisted before the Seventh Regiment was able to subdue the city police and serve the warrant. The reformers then won a victory in state court, with the state police being upheld in court. This was a shaky win, as this led to the city descending into anarchy in July and August at the hands of the pro-Wood Dead Rabbits gang rioting against the Bowery Boys and the Metropolitans.

As if the headache could not get any worse for the mayor, the Panic of 1857 and his reaction to it seemed to seal his doom. He proposed to the Common Council in October 1857 that the city government should undertake an extensive public works program to give laborers work to do, in exchange for in-kind payments of food. The entire program would be financed with a long-term bond at 7% interest, to be paid back in 50 years. He sought to obtain support for this program from the city’s wealthy, but they had turned on Wood and did not support the program. The Common Council would also not act on the program, aside from appropriating $250,000 to begin construction on Central Park. Republicans, former Know-Nothings, and disaffected Tammanities rallied behind Daniel F. Tiemann, a wealthy paint manufacturer, who would narrowly win the December 1857 election. To be sure, this was in part because Republican election inspectors engaged in some electoral inference, closing the polls in some strongly pro-Wood wards before working-class men could vote for him.



Fernando Wood now seemed to be in the political woods, but luckily for him, the political environment had shifted enough that a comeback became possible. His enemies were divided, and although Wood had lost the support of Tammany Hall, he formed his organization (nicknamed “Mozart Hall”) in 1858, and won the mayor’s office once again, beating out the Tammany Hall candidate, William Havemeyer, and George Opdyke, the Republican candidate. Fernando Wood’s victory was celebrated in the South, whose faith in New York’s merchants in turning a blind eye to slavery was growing ever more shaky.

The 1860 presidential campaign changed the calculus irrevocably towards war. Given the city’s strong lean towards the Democratic Party, the Republican Party chose instead to use anti-urban rhetoric to juice margins in rural areas. Meanwhile, prominent New York businessmen sought to unify the Democratic ticket and promote it to voters. The Union ticket polled 62% in New York City, but the Republicans once again dominated upstate New York, thus winning New York’s electoral votes for the Republican Party, helping secure Abraham Lincoln the presidency. After that point, secessionism picked up steam. South Carolina left before Christmas, with other Deep South states following suit. By early February, the Confederate government had been formed.

Some New Yorkers believed that if the Union could not be saved, that the South should leave, and New York should go with it. In January 1861, Mayor Wood had proposed to the Common Council that if the Union dissolved, New York should consider, quoting from its charter, declaring that “New York, be, and from henceforth forever hereafter shall be and remain, a free city of itself.” The Republican attacks on slavery and the state Republicans’ attacks on the home rule status of the city itself were considered by Mayor Wood to be an affront to the concept of local self-government. If the city could declare its independence, Wood said, the city would be free of upstate malfeasance and federal tariffs. Mayor Wood's dream was for a duty-free port, aside from a minimal levy on imports to pay for city operations and allow for local taxation to be abolished, and free trade with both the Union and the Confederacy.

This suggestion was taken seriously by the council. An initial draft of the city’s declaration of independence was quickly written, loosely based on the U.S. Declaration of Independence and that of South Carolina. The die had been cast, or had it been?

The events around the Declaration of Independence of the Free City of New York would induce much confusion. Worse, they would ultimately have no effect, as the declaration of independence turned the people of New York City against the mayor. By the end of April, he was out of office and the city was under martial law, declared by the Governor of New York, Edwin Morgan.

Manhattan had now acquired a new nickname: “Rebel City”. It would stick to the present day.
 
Last edited:

dcharles

Banned
Very good stuff. I'd always wondered exactly what the circumstances were behind NYC's free city nonsense. Is your account similar to OTL?
 
Very good stuff. I'd always wondered exactly what the circumstances were behind NYC's free city nonsense. Is your account similar to OTL?
Up until the Common Council decides to seriously pursue secession, the account does not diverge from OTL.

While reading about NYC's role in the Civil War, it turns out that the free city idea had been hanging around for some time before the war ignited.
 
Last edited:
Declaration of Independence of the Free City of New York
Disclaimer, as the discussion around this is evolving: I used ChatGPT to generate parts of this document. It did an okay job overall but I was not going to just post its output outright. I got it to generate three versions of the document and did some further changes by hand. The account that follows the document was written by myself.



DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE
OF THE FREE CITY OF NEW YORK
IN COMMON COUNCIL

The people of the City of New York, in Common Council assembled, on the 4th day of February, A.D., 1861, do declare that when in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for a city to dissolve the political bonds which have connected it with a larger body, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold that the City of New York, as a significant economic and political polity within the State of New York and the United States of America, has the right to self-government and the pursuit of its best interests, following the principles established by the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution of the United States, and that whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness.

Our City has been denied its right to self-government and subjected to unjust policies that threaten our prosperity and way of life. In light of these grievances, we hereby declare the causes which impel us to separate from the United States of America and the State of New York.
  1. Congress, by imposing high tariffs on our commerce, has unjustly burdened our people and hindered the prosperity of this City.
  2. The State Legislature has grievously interfered with the affairs of the City without the consent of the people, encroaching upon our rights and liberties as citizens of New York City.
  3. The federal government has failed to adequately address the grievances of the Southern states, thereby threatening the unity of the United States, and placing our peace and safety in danger.
  4. The City of New York has been subjected to unequal representation in the State Legislature, resulting in the suppression of our interests and the promotion of those of other regions.
  5. In light of the dissolution of the Union, the City of New York recognizes its unique position as a hub of commerce and international trade, and desires to maintain its economic ties with both the remaining United States and the emerging Confederate States.
We, therefore, the Representatives of the City of New York, in Common Council assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do solemnly publish and declare that the City of New York is, and of right ought to be, a Free and Independent City-State; that we are absolved from all allegiance to the United States of America and the State of New York, and that all political connection between us and them is, and ought to be, totally dissolved.

As a Free and Independent City-State, New York City shall have full power to levy war, conclude peace, contract alliances, establish commerce, and to do all other acts and things which independent States may of right do. We pledge to maintain peaceful and prosperous relations with all nations and states, including the remaining United States of America and the Confederate States of America, and to act in the best interests of our people, ensuring their security, well-being, and the continued prosperity of our great City.

Signed by the Representatives of the City of New York, ____ __, 1861.



The Declaration of Independence of the Free City of New York was penned largely by Fernando Wood himself, although he was not lacking for help in producing the treasonous document, as Dan Sickles also assisted in the drafting. The document was less a statement of values and more a statement of grievances and bitterness against the Republican Party, not just for its successful 1857 efforts to consolidate control over New York City but also as a reaction against the election of Abraham Lincoln, a figure greatly disliked in the city.

Even up to the beginning of the American Civil War, the city signaled its desire to keep the Union whole so it would not have to resort to such a drastic action. Many city leaders were sympathetic to the South (not the least because their wealth was in large part provided by the South's prolific business with the city), the Democratic newspapers whipped up fears that New York could not survive as part of the Union without the South, and Wall Street financiers threatened a capital strike that could limit the ability of the North to carry on a war with the South. Yet, they were also prepared to strike out on their own, and some looked at the free port cities in Germany as a positive example to emulate.

The United States could ill afford its largest port city departing the Union, given the sad state of the Treasury, which had been nearly emptied by the time Abraham Lincoln took office, and New York's key position in trade with the rest of the world, exporting products from the rest of the Union with its access to the sea, its canals and railroads. When word of the document arrived in Albany and Washington, the response was unanimous: martial law was necessary to keep New York in line, lest secessionism take hold elsewhere in the Union. Thus, the New York National Guard was sent in to seize control over the machinery of government and arrest the mayor and everyone who had signed the furtive declaration of independence.

Luckily for the Republicans, the South were the ones to deliver the blow to the dream of the Free City. In March 1861, the Confederacy announced its tariff policy, which would charge lower tarriffs, making it less expensive to import foreign products via southern ports. The second blow came with the first shots being shot at Fort Sumter. The declaration of independence was poorly timed to take place just after the shots began firing, and so the Union waited until the perfect moment to strike. The day before the declaration was made public, martial law was declared and the National Guard took over City Hall, then Abraham Lincoln announced that the declaration of independence of New York City was intended to further tear the Union apart. Crowds filled Union Square eagerly supporting the Union cause, and the dominant pro-Southern city leadership were denounced as traitors.

"Rebel City" would prove to be a source of both much needed support for the Union and the origin of many of its headaches, but the Union had been successful in preventing another secession attempt, one that could have proven potentially fatal to the American Republic. Now it set its sights on bringing the wayward Southern states back into the Union. With that, the American Civil War had begun.
 
Last edited:
The next post will contain a new twist in the story, but one that will be even more interesting: an earlier consolidation of the city into six boroughs. It will cover the city during the American Civil War, including a new city charter that will permanently shift influence in the metropolitan area towards Brooklyn. The reason is simple: while workshopping this story, I realized that the most logical punishment for Manhattan trying to secede is to see it lose almost all its political power.

Although Brooklyn becomes the key beneficiary of the ACW, the story of Manhattan is not going to be one of decline and animosity, as I think that story would be cliche and deeply uninteresting. The borough will remain influential, although it will continue to struggle to gain equal representation once again, having now been denied it by Albany. Instead, it will engage in other ways to have its voice heard, and the borough will become a breeding ground for radical politics, but will remain a diverse melting pot of cultures and be the origin of new trends. Meanwhile, Brooklyn's new role will result in some minor changes to the story, but the Long Island Water Wars still happen (why fix what isn't broken? it's not like there's enough Croton water to go around yet...) and the Brooklyn Connector Line will still exist.

Now it is Manhattan that will be the Bitter Borough, and longtime New Yorkers will joke about the City of Greater Brooklyn...
 
New York City During the American Civil War
New York City had a complicated role in the American Civil War. It had tried to secede, and when that failed, the city fell almost entirely in line behind the Union. Once almost like a second home for Southern businessmen, they were now mutually persona non grata. Where it once profited from the bitter, poisoned fruits of the South’s slavery, it now financed and fueled the war on behalf of the Union. Finally, of course, it was home to a protest against the draft that turned into a race riot in 1863, which ended in bloodshed.

In the end, New York State would provide nearly a fifth of the men who fought for the Union in the Civil War. Many of them signed up for service in one of the many recruitment offices that sprang up in Manhattan and Brooklyn. New York banks were eager to loan money to the federal government, in hopes of making up for bad Southern debt. The city would produce last-minute goods to ship to the South, before shifting into overdrive to make tools of war for the North.

Too many people refer to New York with a “Rebel City” or “Treason City” stereotype to mock Fernando Wood’s secession attempt, but this reductionism ignores New York’s far more interesting and conflicting roles in the American Civil War.



Excerpt from: Treason City: New York City During the Civil War, John Strausbaugh, 2018

[…]

News of the furtive secession spread very quickly, but owing to martial law, the reaction was muted, notwithstanding the jubilant pro-Union demonstrations in Union Square organized by the Union Defense Committee, which military authorities permitted. Less pleased were some of New York’s most prominent businessmen, meeting at the elite Trinity Church. When the news of the Declaration of Independence’s failure, the South firing at Fort Sumter, and martial law came to the assembled businessmen, there was visible silence until someone said, in anguish, “My God, not only are we ruined, but completely screwed!” There was every reason to believe all these words: over $150 million in Southern debt was suddenly not going to be repaid, and many of those assembled either tacitly supported the city’s secession or made plans to assist the independent city-state government if it came to be.

The New York Herald, run by Fernando Wood’s brother, Benjamin, was shuttered not long after the news came to light: the next issue was due to be the mechanism for publishing the Declaration of Independence of the Free City, and was brimming with editorials praising the city for “taking such a momentous step to break free of the Republican Party.” Indeed, the only effect of the Declaration of Independence of the Free City of New York had been to cause a run on the banks, although the near-immediate imposition of martial law closed the banks, buying them precious time to shore up their balance sheets, and there were no bank failures.

In the wake of the failure of the declaration of independence, Southern businessmen and plantation owners ended all business relationships with the city, given that it still wound up staying in the union. Southern newspapers even went as far as to mock the city for even trying, with The Times-Picayune of New Orleans saying “the jesters of New York had good heart in seeking to break from the Union, but did not carry the plan out seriously, so their silly Declaration of Independence best belongs in that most dirty and unclean of rivers, the Hudson.” The city entered a brief economic slowdown, with many laborers going out of work due to the abrupt end of business from the South.

However, the secessionist play was not enough to drive business away from the city. With bad wheat yields in Europe in 1860 and 1861, New York’s ports began to bustle once again with a voracious demand for American wheat, now being shipped east from the interior via railroad and the Erie Canal rather than south via the Mississippi. Vast quantities of cattle from the west were slaughtered in the city, while oil from the newly discovered oil fields around Titusville, Pennsylvania was shipped in via rail and processed at small oil refineries in Greenpoint and Williamsburg in Brooklyn. Sugar refining became a big business, with the Havemeyer family getting rich off it. Ironworks fired up, and shipyards actively went into the business of producing warships. Speculators and swindlers managed to win their fair share of military contracts, adding a layer of graft to the mix. But war meant business - the universal language of New York.

[...]



Excerpt from: Gotham: A History of New York City to 1919, Mike Wallace, Edwin G. Burrows, 1999

[...]

Against this backdrop, the state legislature in Albany set about punishing Manhattan for attempting to secede in the first place, aiming to finish the work started in 1857. The abortive secession attempt was also the perfect time for opponents of Tammany Hall to settle scores on their own terms, with Wood’s and Havemeyer’s organizations now in disarray, and for upstate legislators to further claw power from the city.

That punishment came in the form of a new charter for a City of Greater New York in August 1861. This new charter, at least on paper, could be seen as rewarding Manhattan’s malfeasance. The state legislature annexed all of Kings County (today the borough of Brooklyn), much of Westchester County, including Yonkers and Mount Vernon (today the boroughs of the Bronx and Union), four towns of Queens County (Hempstead, Newtown, Flushing, and Jamaica), today known as the Borough of Newtown, and all of Richmond County (today known as the borough of Staten Island) into Manhattan. Most residents of these towns were, at best, ambivalent to outright infuriated that they would be lumped in with “Rebel City”, and to be sure, there were protests against the plan within the metropolitan area. However, the annexation of nearly 415,000 more people to the City was engineered to dilute the influence of the Irish working class voters that had proven such a reliable voting base for Tammany Hall.

Now with six boroughs, including Manhattan itself, the charter established six Borough Councils, which had authority to control the affairs of the borough it was in alone. Outside of that, the newly reconstituted Common Council represented the entire city, and had the power to override any decision of a Borough Council. The city-wide Common Council was malapportioned, such that the smallest borough of the new Greater City, Staten Island, with its 21,508 residents at the time of the 1860 Census, had more votes on the council than the most populous borough, Manhattan, with its 805,658 residents. The governor was also empowered to appoint at least 3 at-large members to the Common Council and reserved the exclusive right to remove a member from the Council at any time for any reason. Finally, while the legislature shot down a proposal to have the mayor be appointed by the governor instead of being subject to popular vote, formal authority now rested in the Common Council rather than in the mayor, effectively reducing the mayor to purely a ceremonial role.

With that, Manhattan suffered a complete and total humiliation. Brooklyn evolved from a satellite city to being the apex of power in the metropolitan area, a position it would permanently retain. To this day, longtime New Yorkers still refer to the city established by the 1861 charter as the “City of Greater Brooklyn.”

Little did the rural legislators in Albany know that they had spawned a monster, but while the fever pitch of war was high, they paid no heed. For now, they were quite satisfied with putting the city in its place.

[...]

The birth of the Six Boroughs did not immediately change New York City’s politics. The state installed pro-Unionist leadership, ranging from War Democrats to dyed-in-the-wool Radical Republicans who insisted that the war should be a means for emancipation. The new city did not integrate the Six Boroughs in any meaningful way - some of the local power structures even persisted into the 20th century. It would not be until the late 1880s when progressive reformers would start to take the initial steps towards coalescing the Greater City, reshaping the city into its present-day form.

One of the first acts of the new Common Council under the new city charter was to move the seat of government. Manhattan’s City Hall, having been tainted by the stench of secessionism, was no longer seen as fit for purpose by the city’s new Unionist leadership, and so the new City Hall was set up across the East River in the former city hall of Brooklyn. Some advocated for the former City Hall to be demolished and replaced with a monument mocking the “Treasonous Traitors” that had signed on so eagerly onto secession in 1861, however those plans were not acted upon. The former City Hall, now renamed Manhattan Borough Hall, would continue to exist, primarily for its historical value, although it spent most of its time being weathered by the elements, and it came perilously close to demolition in 1963 as it was no longer used for government offices and was considered to be a monument to a small window of the city’s historical development, however it was saved by the actions of preservationists and today serves as a museum discussing New York City’s complicated role in the Civil War.

It was into the newly reconstituted city and the new political environment that George Opdyke stepped into in 1862, with the state appointing him as the first civilian Mayor of Greater New York. A former Whig and clothing merchant and manufacturer, he had joined the Republican Party before the war, effectively making him a political exile in this Democratic city, but the exigency of the war provided him with an opportunity to step into the office that he had been denied 3 years earlier. Opdyke would have to deal with a restive Manhattan during his brief stint as mayor, with a major draft riot erupting in 1863, which was put down with some difficulty.

But Opdyke was only an interim leader, and not a popular one, having been caught up in a profiteering scandal only a year after taking office. Soon, the city would need to elect a new mayor. The Democratic Party had made some attempts to coalesce, and Tammany Hall hoped to test the waters and see how the enlarged city would affect its chances. Opdyke chose not to run, given the circumstances. Havemeyer, once a creature of Tammany Hall, saw an opportunity and pressed it: he presented himself as for not only the Union but also the abolition of slavery and for reform, and secured the Republican line. Opposing him was Tammany Hall’s candidate Charles G. Gunther, and Martin Kalbfleisch, the Mayor of Brooklyn who had been removed from office once the city was merged with New York. Havemeyer won the election and was sworn into office in 1865, just in time to see the end of the Civil War and oversee the reconstruction of the city and its new political order.

[...]
 
Last edited:
Brilliant work so far--Wood's secession attempt has always fascinated me, and I'm interested to see where Greater Brooklyn goes ITTL. Of course, the attempt to dilute NYC's immigrants with Brooklyn and Queens WASPs won't last long--you'll just see the Irish, Italian, and Jewish waves fill Brooklyn sooner than IOTL.

Funny enough, the "Rebel city" nickname might actually mean that Confederate paraphernalia will become part of NYC's tourist and political culture as opposition symbols.

Screwing Long Island like this is also an interesting development--on the plus side, low land costs mean that it might hold onto its aviation industry.

Tammany, you say, is weakened...but something tells me Boss Tweed can't be kept down for long.
 
Brilliant work so far--Wood's secession attempt has always fascinated me, and I'm interested to see where Greater Brooklyn goes ITTL. Of course, the attempt to dilute NYC's immigrants with Brooklyn and Queens WASPs won't last long--you'll just see the Irish, Italian, and Jewish waves fill Brooklyn sooner than IOTL.

Funny enough, the "Rebel city" nickname might actually mean that Confederate paraphernalia will become part of NYC's tourist and political culture as opposition symbols.

Screwing Long Island like this is also an interesting development--on the plus side, low land costs mean that it might hold onto its aviation industry.

Tammany, you say, is weakened...but something tells me Boss Tweed can't be kept down for long.
Thank you for the kind words! Indeed, the nativists are going to fail in their doomed mission.

Confederate paraphernalia is definitely going to be a part of the city's culture, although politically it's rather touchy subject, given the context of the actual secession attempt. Most politicians are not going to comment on it, or will make some vague remark to acknowledge it before moving onto another subject. While New York City secessionist groups exist to the present day ITTL, their influence is next to nil. However, Manhattan has been especially successful in cashing in on its reputation to attract both tourists and “contrarians”, and the borough has been at times home to various radical movements. You will find souvenir shops in the city happy to sell you a miniature Confederate battle flag, a Rebel City baseball cap, and a Brooklyn beanie hat, even outside Manhattan. The Civil War Museum at the Manhattan Borough Hall is a popular tourist attraction, and there are many restaurants that serve Southern food, both antebellum and modern, with an especially high concentration around the museum.

I actually got the idea to screw over Long Island while workshopping this! The relative autonomy each borough gets under the 1861 charter was crafted to allow me to have this scenario play out, and so Brooklyn retains its existing water distribution system. This is the logical conclusion of having the city continue tapping Long Island water instead of connecting to Manhattan's aqueduct system. You would not get a truly unified City of Greater New York until much later on - I've dropped a hint as to when that happens in the post. So far what has transpired has been a bit of a state-mandated shotgun marriage, with Brooklyn now in the driver's seat.

Tammany has indeed been weakened, but that doesn't mean it can't retain significant power. There will also be new local political machines in each borough, and some of them will form alliances with each other. I do have ideas for Boss Tweed, but we'll have to wait for the 1870s to see them play out...
 
Last edited:
The Death of Wall Street and the Rise of Clark Street
Here's a quick bite about Clark Street, the center of the American financial industry. The next full post will cover the some final bits of Civil War-era New York City history, and the immediate years following the war's end.

The other major consequence of the Declaration of Independence of the Free City of New York had been to shake investor confidence in the American financial industry and economy, especially given New York’s position as the gateway to the country’s markets. Foreign investors who had bought bonds and stocks in the United States now sought to sell them off as soon as martial law was lifted in New York City. This led to the possibility that New York could lose its crown as the gateway to the American economy to a different city, and so Wall Street had to decisively act.

They responded by moving Wall Street to their backyards in Brooklyn.

Brooklyn Heights had begun to develop in the early 19th century thanks to the financing and opening of Robert Fulton’s steam ferry carrying passengers between Manhattan and Brooklyn, and this ferry route eventually led Brooklyn Heights into becoming a suburb of Manhattan. Many of the people who moved were bankers who were tired of living in Lower Manhattan with the rest of the hoi polloi. But now this role was reversed with the American Civil War and Manhattan’s failed attempt to secede. It had now become an imperative to move the financial industry from Manhattan in order to restore investor confidence in the American economy.

Thus the great task of relocating Wall Street began even before the Greater City of New York came into being. The New York Stock Exchange reopened as the Brooklyn Stock Exchange in 1862, located on Clark Street in Brooklyn Heights, and more institutions steadily made the move through the 1860s. Wall Street in Manhattan was thus afterwards relegated to the position of hosting back offices for Clark Street, but eventually it became cheaper to relocate and reconsolidate these operations with new communications and computer technologies, and thus even this back office use was largely abandoned by the 1970s, with Clark Street’s back office activities moving to various locations in New Jersey or the eastern parts of New York City or Long Island, although the concentration was particularly acute in downtown Jersey City, leading to it being nicknamed “Far Clark Street.” Wall Street and much of Lower Manhattan then fell prey to urban decay, something that would not be overcome until crime rates began to plummet in the 1990s.

Today, Brooklyn Heights is known as the financial district of New York City (and the center of the U.S. financial industry) and is colloquially referred to as “Clark Street”, or to old timers, “Wall Street East.” Traders flock to the Brooklyn Stock Exchange and trade on its floors. Brooklyn Heights is a high-density commercial neighborhood largely centered on financial services, with many of the bankers that had once called Brooklyn Heights home moving to other parts of Brooklyn, to Newtown, to Staten Island, or to New Jersey, although some of the old brownstones remain standing to this day, which correspondingly fetch high prices in the area’s real estate market. The area is easily accessible via subway and rail, thanks to it being within walking distance from Penn Station in Downtown Brooklyn, and it is accessible via road from the rest of New York City and from other parts of New Jersey, New York State, and Connecticut.

Meanwhile, what was once Manhattan’s Financial District is now hip and an example of creative readaptation, and is now known as SoBoHa, or South of Borough Hall, or simply as SoBo. The former New York Stock Exchange building at 55 Wall Street is now an artists’ cooperative, with apartments on the top floors and the rotunda regularly hosting rotating art galleries. Numerous buildings have been refurbished and turned into apartments, restaurants, hotels, event venues, and for other uses. This, however, has caused property values (and thus rents) to skyrocket, leading to the area growing less bohemian over time, and in a great twist of irony, luring young workers working on Clark Street to the district. Nonetheless, people flock to see what was the historic center of the American financial industry, visit the nearby Civil War Museum at the Manhattan Borough Hall, and then walk or ride across the Two Boroughs Bridge to enter Downtown Brooklyn and then walk to Clark Street. The area is relatively well-accessible via subway, though typically as a local stop.
 
Last edited:
Top