The Annals of Aelius -- A History of Rome Under the Julian Emperors

Which writing style should I stick with from here on out?

  • I love reading your mediocre imitation of Latin prose, keep the historian-style

  • The full text gave me suicidal thoughts, TL;DR, stick to the summaries

  • Both is fine, I'm only skimming anyways


Results are only viewable after voting.
Very interesting update...

Seems that, at least in the new German cities, the Romanization it's making progress in Germany. The new administrative/political subdivision of the Atlantic/Western Provinces besides to the, internal political motivation, seems clear that too, will improve their administration but especially their defense. Also, with the Empire in peace again, with the Caesar's enemies crushed, with the new provinces integration progressing and the strong defense of the new northern borders seems that the external peace has been secured, too.
Given the lack of enemies that could be capable to menace the whole Empire beyond the borders and given the kind of lands beyond the Albis and the Danube and its relative emptiness, seems that at least for the short to middle term, the expansion beyond those limits that would be considered as impractical. But I think that now, perhaps could be time to give more attention to the southern border, for the Cesar but especially, I guess, for the Hispanian Imperator...

Thanks as always for the feedback!

The institutional evolution of the empire IOTL is going to be a pendulum swing between centralization and decentralization of various institutional arrangements in the provinces/army/bureaucracy. The creation of the general imperiatorships will present the same problem that the late Republic faced, whereby single individuals have control of overwhelming military forces. To combat this, these individuals are not given their own imperium, but rather the imperium of the reigning emperor, and furthermore, they do not participate in the economic, judicial, or administrative proceedings in the provinces, therefore they cannot develop their own clients and following in the provinces. However, their military might alone is a serious threat, and so I'm going to gradually consolidate several legions into a central reserve (in addition to the praetorian guards), so that any such attempts at seizing the throne will appear un-appetizing. Of course, this comes at the cost of vesting the reserve army with the power to become kingmakers, as the praetorians became IOTL, and so they will be commanded by a set of constantly shifting officers so that no coherent elite body will be able to form organized resistance to the emperor by this avenue.

Regarding the provinces, Germany may be stable, but the Danube and Parthian borders will still need a lot of work. I'm going to arrange for several provinces to be given to client kings so that the Parthians will only border Syria, which will lower the defense cost of the Eastern front. This will free up troops to consolidate along the Danube. Although marginal threats have been addressed by the campaigns of the Illyrian War, Gaius' Dacian campaigns, and most recently Drusus' war with the Sarmatians, the overall strategic power of the Dacians and Sarmatians has not been severely diminished, and it must be dealt with in the long term. Whether or not that will include the annexation of Dacia remains to be seen, but it will be the primary concern of the next few emperors.
 
Last edited:
Book 28: 42-45 CE
Liber Septimius ——— DCCXCIV ad DCCCIX Annos ab Urbe Condita
Book Twenty Eight - Division of the House

Numidian.jpg

Rogue Garamantine tribesmen charge the formation of Caecina

—In the consulship of Marcus Valerius Messalla Corvinus and Sextus Papinius Allenius…

There was a dispute in the elections of the numerous colleges of minor magistrates. In the times of the Commonwealth, these magistrates — among whom were minor judges, commissioners of the vigiles, mint administrators, and prefects of the various public roads and facilities around Italia — were elected by the assembly of the tribes, which had been abolished by the divine Drusus, however no electoral procedures were established for them among the senate. The censors had been ambivalent on this issue thusfar, and the consuls in the previous years were bothered by prostrations before Caesar and many were too young or inexperienced to concern themselves with such things. In this vacuum, the secretary-general, Marcianus Rex, had taken upon himself the duty of appointing such minor officials. However, at this time, Appius Pulcher elected to assert the privileges of the senate on this matter, as he was disdainful of the influence of the freedmen bureaucrats in Rome. He brought this matter before the consilium principis, and it was decided that they would, each year, determine the pool of candidates for these offices, whereafter they would be presented before the senate. Rex was cooperative with this measure, as he was confident in his position thusfar and did not fear the diminution of his power of appointments given his great wealth. However, this measure drove a wedge between the censors, as Aviola was a man more principled than ambitious, and his friendships with many of the freedmen secretaries made him cautious of the allegiance of Pulcher, whom was himself more ambitious than principled.

In the later weeks of Junius, Aulus Caecina, the governor of Africa, was approached by King Ptolemy of Mauritania, whom feared a revolution in that country. His request to establish a garrison of three cohorts in his capital under the oversight of an equestrian prefect was rejected outright, for fear of compromising the borders of Africa, although Caecina elected to personally lead a significant force on a tour through that country for a brief time in order to placate Ptolemy and dissuade the unruly from their brigandage. This column of five cohorts and their auxiliae met little resistance for the first weeks of the expedition. They were showered with gifts from the Mauritanian elites and populace alike, who greeted them as liberators from the despotisms forced upon them by the violence of banditry. However, as this column left the city of Sitifis, a detachment of the Garamantes, a nomadic people whom lived to the South of Africa and Mauritania, fell upon the unsuspecting legionaries and routed their auxiliary cavalry alae. Caecina briefly considered retreat, but when his tesserarius took note of the loose and disorganized sorties of the barbarians, he ordered a wing of his cohorts to feign retreat and upon their pursuit, wheel around and use their remaining pila as pikes against the charging cavalry. The untrained nerves of the barbarians saw them take flight at this maneuver, whereafter the recuperated alae of cavalry dispatched the remainder of the barbarians. A temporary camp was constructed and a few days of tense vigils saw Caecina fit to order a withdrawal to the province of Africa. He thusly requested that Caesar might reinforce their garrison with men from Spain and Aegypt, neither of which had seen significant combat in at least a decade. Caesar obliged and sent five cohorts under the command of Pinarius Natta, an equite, to be dispersed throughout Mauritania along the coast and based at Sitifis.

Elsewhere, the younger Drusus continued his work of establishing a defensible frontier in Germany. Small forts were interspersed along the length of the Albis River as well as running perpendicular to it wherein the bulk of the legionary forces would be quartered and their watchtowers placed. This included numerous small palisades which might serve to delay any minor incursions while reinforcements might arrive by means of river transport in the event of a larger assault. Drusus also saw fit to increase the size of the Classis Albiensis, which patrolled the frigid Albian waters. While Drusus was occupied with these, his friend and ally Corbulo became disquieted. He had been a steadfast ally of Drusus and Caesar, and had been one of the legati to march against Agrippa, and yet his less-distinguished colleague, Lollius was granted greater favors in light of his marriage to the daughter of Marcus Rufus. Corbulo became resentful and sought to improve his own position by means of seeking to exact greater taxes from the peoples of Vindelicia, of which he was the governor at that time. This won him favor from Caesar, although it did not ingratiate him to the men whom had been made citizens in the settlements at Vindelicia, including Decumanticum and Vistriodunum.

Meanwhile, at Rome, the new praetor patriae, Julius Fulvus, the son of a freedman of Augustus, entertained a number of prosecutions undertaken by Claudius Primus, whom despite having been chastised by his colleagues, was not deterred in his ambitions. Among his targets were numerous elder senators whom had been complicit in the coup undertaken by Agrippa. These were men on the stature of Fulcinius Trio, Lucius Silanus, and even the former consuls Octavius Laenas and Gabinius. Each was tried before the senate by Primus and the equite Lutorius Priscus, and each in turn was exiled and their estates were confiscated. Some, like Octavius, saw fit to commit suicide rather than undergo the humiliation that flight from the city would certainly bring. The younger of these men, Trio, would have no such compunctions, and managed to smuggle a significant amount of his assets with him to Rhodes where he would enjoy them in his exile. However, these prosecutions were not undertaken lightly or without strong opposition, and many young and impassioned men, such as Sextus Mummius, were particularly vocal in their misgivings. He soon came under surveillance and veiled threats from Primus, whereafter he fled the city to Germany and his patron, Drusus.

In the closing of that year, Caesar dismissed Florus and Postumus, the praetorian prefects, and assigned in their place Hosidius Geta and Justus Catonius, whom were comrades in arms with his sons, having served in the last of the civil wars. Also at that time, a great embassy from the East arrived at Rome. Among its number were the kings and magistrates from Greece and Asia, including some whom no longer ruled in their own right, such as Antiochus of Cappadocia. Alternatively, some were merely delegates of greater kings, such as those of Judea and Bosporus, whom did not attend themselves due to internal matters in their own realms. These royal deputies lavished the great wealth of the East upon Caesar’s treasury, which was received by Paullus Fronto as the administrator of barbarian affairs. Thereafter Caesar dispatched a trusted familial ally, Lucius Antonius, to lead an embassy of his own to the East with the power to answer petitions brought to him by the allies and provincials alike. With this resolved, Caesar could rest confident in the security of his regime against any threats or usurpations. His subordinates were too busy fighting one another to be a serious threat to him, and the foreign enemies of the empire were far too weak to compromise this.

Imperial sons.jpg

A relief depicting the surviving sons of Caesar in mourning, with Drusus in the center, Vopiscus in the front, and Gaius in the rear

—In the consulship of Gaius Vettius Rufus and Decimus Haterius Agrippa…
Pulcher and Aviola resigned their censorships at the appointed time and the consuls arranged for the election of their successors. In their place, the senate elected Appius Junius Silanus and Gaius Cassius, whom by this time were both senior statesmen and consulares, with the men their senior long having since perished in the civil wars. Cassius in particular confided to many of his friends that he never would have attained such rank without the upheaval of the civil wars, as his consulship and censorship were both borne from these events. He had proved loyal to Caesar, even though Agrippa had been his father-in-law, and his children, of whom there were three sons and two daughters, were raised on the Palatine in the house of Caesar with his own sons. Appius Silanus was a militarily distinguished man whom had served honorably in the Marcomannic War, as well as the nephew-in-law of Caesar through his marriage to Antonia, the daughter of Tiberius, after she was widowed by Agrippa's death. However, Lucius Cassius, the younger brother of the censor, was visibly distraught at this arrangement. He had become distant from his brother after he was chastised for his resignation of the consulship fourteen years hence, and after the elections, he openly denounced his brother for his betrayal of filial piety and his abandonment of Agrippa in the civil war. In retaliation, Gaius Cassius used his powers as censor to strip Lucius of his senate seat, as well as his consular decorations, and Lucius would commit suicide in the following months out of shame for this rebuke.

Simultaneously, Aurelia, the widow of the deceased Lucius Vipsanianus and the mother of the deceased Gaius Solus, returned to Rome and appealed to Caesar to allow her younger brother, Lucius Cotta — son of Cotta Maximus whom was an ally of Gaius Vipsanianus and whom had been consul eighteen years hence — to return to Rome and deliver the funeral oration for Lucius, whom had yet to be receive one in earnest, although there had been a modest funeral. Caesar obliged, and even awarded the man with a senate seat, although this was without consular decorations and he was graded only as an ex-praetor. He went on to deliver the oration on the Rostra before cheering crowds, as the people had adored Lucius, and although the speech is lost to us today, one contemporary, Vellius Paterculus, commended that his speech was, “Without equal and one of the finest impassioned deliveries ever seen in the Forum in my lifetime since the death of Lepidus.” As cousins, Lucius Cotta quickly developed a camaraderie with Felix Pius, as they shared in common a traumatic experience in the downfall of their fathers from power in the schism and their diminution to obscurity in its aftermath. This saw them enjoy considerable time together, which Marcianus Rex feared, as both men together might accrue a strong following in opposition to his secretariat. To this end, to deprive them of a substantial ally, Rex arranged for Caesar to send Domitius to Spain and dispatch Lucius Antonius on the aforementioned embassy to the East. This would deprive these men of any substantial familial allies within Rome, as Vopiscus was resolutely against their ambitions, and without his support, Cotta and Pius, even with their friendship to Gemellus, would not be able to gain a following to oppose his unrivaled tribunician authority.

Drusus at this time, went with Corbulo, Ostorius Scapula, and Gaius Silius to inspect the legions in their readiness in their castra. The legions were scattered along the border, primarily in individual camps, although the Legiones VII Tiberia and XIV Gemina Victrix were both quartered at Tibeirum in Cisalbis. Most of the legions were under strict and rigorous discipline from their time spent at war with the Sueves, Marcomanni, and Saxons, but many of the legionaries were reportedly of the age where they might retire. This portion, consisting of a significant number of the VII TIberia and VIII Hispanica, sought these disbursements. Unusually though and in contrast to tradition, they did not return to Italia upon their retirement, but instead settled throughout Germania in such cities as Tiberium, Idistaviso, Hyperboreum, and Taurontum — the bulk of which were in the northern quarters of that country. This was done because many of the legionaries, despite the official ban on the practice, had married local women against their orders, and some had even fathered children. Thus they had no desire to return to the noise and industry of the Italian countryside, and preferred to enjoy the quiet simplicity of life in Germania. Drusus thusly made a fateful decision in the capacity of his imperium. Having granted citizenship to the peoples of several of these cities, he ordered that a census and levy be undertaken by the procurators and governors of Cisalbis, Vindelicia, and Angiliensis such that the legions might be replenished from their own numbers, rather than from Italians and Spaniards whom had no familiarity with the terrain of Germany.

Having accomplished this, and having ordered a number of fortified earthworks and palisades constructed in the hills and mountains on the border between Vindelicia and Marcomannicum as a temporary countermeasure against any aggressions thereby, Drusus gathered his allies from among the provincials. This included men from numerous quarters of the empire. Men of Greece and Asia, including Sextus Mummius and Cornelius Burrus, were prominent among this entourage, as were a number of Gauls and Germans descended from the enemies of Rome. Among these were Callistus Vorenus, the son of the Cherusci prince Arminius, and many Gauls sporting the nomen of the Julii from their grants of citizenship by the Divine Julius, Augustus, and Drusus. These men endured persecutions of the freedmen and patricians of Rome alike, and Drusus sought that their protection as his clients might be greater insured by his own presence. They undertook this journey to Rome with astonishing speed, and unescorted by a cavalry wing, which saw their entrance to Bononia within a month of their departure, and only a further two weeks before their entrance to Rome.

In Rome, a number of occurrences that had come about in his absence deeply disturbed Drusus. The first of these was the death of Marcus Germanicus, the second of Caesar’s sons to perish before him. Marcus, named for Agrippa while he and Caesar had been comrades, had enjoyed the close favor and kinship of Drusus — more so than any of their other brothers — and Drusus did not leave his home for several days after the funeral, at which the oration was delivered by his now-youngest brother, Gaius. Secondarily, Caesar had arranged for numerous more marriages in the years since the end of the civil war from among his children and grandchildren. Drusus’ own daughter had been betrothed to the son of Galba, who shared his name, and because of Caesar’s status as paterfamilias, Drusus had been powerless to prevent this. He would have preferred a marriage to one of his own allies, Silius or Corbulo, and he had no particular affinity for Galba, as he had trained Drusus and his brothers in Spain and had been harsh and unwavering in his discipline. Drusus’ brothers had been given much more favorable arrangements. Vopiscus’ son — called Tiberius Julius Caesar Vopiscus Germanicus Publicola and henceforth called Publicola — was married to the granddaughter of Cornelius Dolabella, the former censor. The family of Gaius had been even more favored. He had, by this time, fathered four children, two sons and two daughters, and in the subsequent years he would sire two more daughters with his wife Cornelia — who herself was the descendant of Sulla the dictator. His eldest son, Faustus, was married to Claudia Gemella the Younger, the daughter of Gemellus, whereas his younger son, Marcus had been betrothed to Cornelia Cossa, the granddaughter of the former censor. The daughter of Agrippina by her first husband, Cato, was betrothed to Fabius Persicus in the previous year for his exemplary service to Caesar while Agrippa controlled Rome; the children of Livilla were also given spouses of noble birth, including Quinctilius Varus, Quintus Cassius — the youngest son of Postumia and grandson of Agrippa — and Scribonia, the daughter of Drusus Libo.

His father appeared to have different designs for his eventual rule than did Drusus. Caesar wished that Drusus might consolidate the large and unwieldy Julian family into a small inner circle such that the rebellious tendencies of the noblemen might be tempered by their familial ties. Drusus, on the other hand, wished that a small cohort of his military colleagues and his friends from within the family as well as the provincials would form a group personally loyal to him that he might not be impeded by the actions of his younger brother. Vopiscus himself was themselves becoming more and more insistent of his entitled inheritance by Caesar in both wealth and offices. Vopiscus and Drusus had shared a tense relationship since their training in Spain wherein they had been treated differently by Galba and Domitius, whom had overseen their training. Drusus had been pressured and chided to the aim of perfection, as he was the eldest son of Caesar and the grandson of the Divine Drusus. Vopiscus, on the other hand, had enjoyed the intellectual rigors of history and military scholarship, which thoroughly impressed Galba, whom was content to allow him to study into the late hours of the night while Drusus had been training in a more physical military capacity. This tension was exacerbated when Vopiscus grew jealous at Drusus’ marriage to the daughter of Gaius Vipsanianus and even further when Drusus had been given numerous successive military commands in Germania and Illyricum. This had left Vopiscus alone to advocate for Caesar in Rome whilst Agrippa was in power, and Vopiscus, as a thanks for his services, had been dismissed from the urban prefecture in favor of a legatus whom had been friends with Drusus. He resented this deeply, and the relationship between the two brothers was one of sharp contention.

This tension was becoming more and more apparent to both of these heirs, and neither of them desired to harm the other, for they still possessed of themselves loyalty to the family and a level of mutual care in spite of their disputes. They settled upon a private meeting with only a single slave as a scribe whereby they might bifurcate their responsibilities so as to not incur jealousy on either of their parts. The exact contents of this meeting have been lost to us, but one contemporary historian called Paterculus, claims that they agreed upon a duumvirate command of the provinces and armies upon their accessions and that their younger brother, Gaius, might be the mediator in any of their future disputes, as they both had good relations with him. The two of them would not seek to alienate their other from their fellow Julians in overt fashion, although this was unavoidable in its totality, and in fact several of the princes had already matriculated with a side in the apparently emerging struggle. Drusus enjoyed camaraderie with Felix Pius as well as Gemellus whereas Vopiscus was closer to Antonius Agrippa, whom had personally sought him out when they entered Rome under force of arms in order to ensure his safety and oversaw his election to the urban prefecture. With this conflict resolved, Vopiscus and his cousin Livius sought the advice and counsel of Tiberius the Elder, whom remained in retirement at Nola. Their journey would be a fruitful one, and while Drusus remained at Rome to ensure the formation of a bloc of his provincial allies in the senate, Vopiscus would seek more subtle avenues through which to pursue his own ends.

Antonius Agrippa.jpg

Antonius Agrippa, the eldest surviving male of the Vipsanii family and praetor patriae for that year

—In the consulship of Drusus Julius Caesar Germanicus for the Second Time and Lucius Julius Caesar Felix Pius…
Antonius Agrippa was elected as the praetor patriae and Julius Fulvus, his predecessor, was given the proconsulship of Africa. This was highly unusual, as he had previously been consul, and it was not traditional for men to occupy inferior magistracies in their latter parts of their careers. Many lauded his statesmanship and drew comparison to his grandfather, Marcus Agrippa, who himself occupied the curule aedileship despite having served as ordinary consul four years previously. Agrippa would later serve two successive consulships with the Divine Augustus, and many saw his election as a mark of personal favor from Caesar, and the aristocracy grew to see his own patronage as an avenue by which they might seek favors and honors for themselves. In his capacity as an administrator, and with the aid of his consular colleagues, Drusus and Felix, Antonius brought forth the creation of an extraordinary magistracy, the magister peditum. This office, split in responsibilities between two men, would wield overall imperium over the fields armies in Germania and Illyricum and the riverine fleets on the frontiers. This was in accordance with the body of the laws, which only stipulated that the establishment of an extraordinary magistracy might not be undertaken by men who sought this office for themselves, and as Antonius would be ineligible for this office whilst he served as praetor, he did not arouse suspicions among the senate of any madness for power or empire. The stipulation of this office was that once must have been a legatus or proconsul for at least ten years, although it was not necessary that each of these legatures or proconsulships be served consecutively or even in the same province. The elections were overseen by Appius Silanus, who ensured that his friends and allies, Gaius Aviola and Galerius would assume this awesome mantle. They departed within the year with their staffs and established a command center at Aquilea, which had easy access to both Illyricum, Italia, and Germania.

At this time, Drusus established an understanding with his comrades whom had served with him in Germania. Several of them had become discontented at not having received consulships in exchange for their labors, while others had. Lollius and Silius in particular, resented Otho and Corbulo for their part in ousting Agrippa from Rome whilst they had remained sat in Germania tending to sheep and deterring armed revolt, rather than winning glory. Drusus remedied this by making promises to these men, and others, that the consular elections of the next several years would be personally overseen by him. The elder Caesar was becoming increasingly absent from public life, and Drusus believed that he would be elevated to co-emperor within a few years, and felt comfortable that his father would not dissuade him from taking such oaths. The remainder of these men, including Corbulo, Marcellus, and Scapula, would be dispersed to Germania and Illyria where they might assume greater command capacity than they had in the previous years. Each man would assume an imperatorial position in the provinces, and they would act as a safeguard by Drusus against any mutinous ideations upon the eventual transfer of power.

However, Drusus was grief-stricken at the death of his only son, called Nero, in that same year. The young man had become well-known in his penchant for unrest and mischief in his youth, and had spent numerous nights on the streets of Rome causing disease with his compatriots. The vigiles, in their haste to dampen any such frivolities from the disruption of the peace, had wounded Nero, not recognizing him in the dark, and he had died of his wounds shortly thereafter. The prefect of the vigiles, Lucius Pontius, committed suicide upon hearing this news, and Drusus briefly considered decimating the urban cohorts in his rage, although he was tempered by the guiding hand of Caesar. His relationship with his wife, Julia Augusta — the daughter of Gaius Vipsanianus — was a strained one after Drusus’ many years spent in the provinces, and she was unlikely to produce another child. The solution upon which he settled was an unusual one; he adopted a young man whose father was a close ally of Caesar and who was militarily distinguished, but who was also his son-in-law. This man was Servius Sulpicius Galba the younger, the only son of Servius Galba, the consul of fifteen years hence. Galba and Drusilla were already betrothed, and thus the adoption of Servius into the family of the Caesars required no further disruptions within the family. This was done in spite of the personal disdain between the two men; Galba was a powerful agent of Caesar whom was widely respected in both the senate and the legions for his distinguished service in both Spain and Illyricum, and Drusus sought his gravitas as a means to his own ends. This was also done at the urging of Paullus Fronto, the freedman secretary to Caesar. Fronto was a savvy man whom had survived the turbulence of recent years, and sought for himself a secure position in which he might be safe from his enemies. Among these enemies was Claudius Primus, the freedman overseer of the informants of Caesar both within Rome and throughout Italia. Primus had been a creditor of Fronto’s during the reign of the Divine Drusus, when both men were young, and after the accession of Gaius Vipsanianus, numerous debts were cancelled as a program of his regime. The dismissal of these debts was confirmed by Caesar when he ousted Gaius in the civil war, and Paullus had thus forth been a vocal and covert opponent of Primus. Although Primus was the wealthier and more distinguished of the two men, Fronto enjoyed a close camaraderie with the freedmen secretaries — Julius Carbo, Horatius Etruscus, and Julius Trachalus — and thus sought to subvert the influence of Primus by this means.

At this time, the situation in the eastern provinces had been deteriorating for some time. The death of Tiridates III saw a power vacuum which Tiridates’ sons, Phraates and Vologases, vied with one another for control of that whole country. The foreign clients of these men donated to each of them men and supplies, and the effects that this had on the various kingdoms in the East lent itself to widespread revolution. The kings of Hatra and Commagena had fallen under the suzerainty of Osroene and appealed to the governor of Syria, Lucius Antonius, whom was a kinsman of Caesar and the husband of Cassia Longina, the granddaughter of Agrippa by his daughter Postumia and her husband, Gaius Cassius the censor. Antonius sent word to Caesar, and in the meantime, marshaled his forces, as Syria was the only province in the empire apart from Aegypt in which the legions remained under the direct command of a governor. Caesar’s instructions were unusual to Antonius, whom was himself a traditionalist and an admirer of men such as Pompeius Magnus and the Divine Julius whom had founded great swaths under the empire. Caesar ordered Antonius to merely lend a few small cohorts to the aid of Commagena and to furthermore install the cousin of Polemo, the king of Pontus, whom was himself called Pharnaces Philopator, as the king of Cappadocia and to withdraw the two legions from that country. The living heir to Archelaeus of Cappadocia, Antiochus, was placated upon his return from Rome with the throne of Lesser Armenia. Caesar sought that the eastern borders of his empire might have as few points of congruence with those of the Parthians, such that the overwhelming superiority of the Syrian infantry might not be offset by the mobility of the Parthian cavalry. To this end, clients such as Commagena, Cappadocia, Pontus, and Lesser Armenia would bear the brunt of any such incursions for a brief time before the full might of the legions could be brought to bear. However, in the case of such transgressions, no Roman blood would be shed until absolutely necessary, and the legions in that country wholeheartedly approved of this. As insurance of the loyalty of Pharnaces, his daughter was sent to Judea to become the wife of Herod Agrippa, whom was the king in that country at the time.

Later in the year, Vopiscus, his younger brother Gaius, and their uncle Tiberius the elder, the brother of Caesar, returned to Rome. They were welcomed by the people of the city as well as many of the senate, whom had grown to distrust Drusus’ favor for his military comerades, and preferred Vopiscus, whom they viewed as more closely aligned with the needs of Italia and with the city itself. However, this return was not a calm one, and Vopiscus immediately launched into a vigorous denouncement of Julius Trachalus, whom was at that time the secretary of the treasury. Vopiscus himself undertook the prosecution of Trachalus on the grounds of having supposedly arranged for the murder of a friend of Vopiscus — one Vibulenus Agrippa whom had been a tribune in the previous year. Trachalus himself possessed a poor record with respect to the tribunes, whom he viewed as bothersome, and he had mistreated several of them in the years since his return to Rome. Vopiscus was joined in this by the ex-tribunes Salvius Crispus and Petronius Niger as well as several prominent senators. Sempronius Longus and Verginius Rufus both made appearances at the various stages of the trial, which alarmed many of the other bureaucrats whom were colleagues of Trachalus, and they became fearful for their own position. Caesar elected not to intervene, and Trachalus was convicted and later committed suicide. In his place, the very wealthy yet also vicious freedman, Fabius Corvus, was selected by Vopiscus. Fronto and Carbo in particular were alarmed, and they sought refuge in the form of guarantees of their safety by Drusus while the secretary-general, Marcianus Rex, remained aloof to such machinations.

Lastly in this year, another of the scions of the old order passed away. The elder Drusus Nero, having been consul with Visellius Varro and later censor with Sextus Pompeius and Cornelius Dolabella, succumbed to an illness in his home on the Caelian Hill. His son, Gemellus, delivered his funeral oration and presented his only issue, the young Gaius Claudius Nero with his bride-to-be, Domitia Longina, the daughter of Corbulo, as the sole inheritance of the Claudian house. This was a slight against Appius Pulcher, whom had recently been censor, although the man was too old and well-respected to have been seriously affected by the remarks of a noble stripling grasping for recognition in this manner.

Judge giving decision.jpg

Drusus gives orders from his headquarters in Germania for fortifications to be built

—In the consulship of Tiberius Julius Caesar Germanicus Vopiscus for the Second Time and Aulus Didius Gallus…
Caesar saw fit at this time to redeploy the legions levied by Felix and Rufus after the usurpation of Agrippa. However, he eschewed the tradition of exempting Italia from any such garrisons, and sought that these two legions might be stationed in the northern reaches of Italia as a safeguard against the seizure of that country by any unlawful usurper. These, and two others, would form the central Italian army, which was itself composed primarily of Italian recruits and conscripts, and it was decided that these legions would be commanded by the consuls after their year in office, whereafter the consuls might either leave for the provinces or return to Rome.

Vopiscus at this time had been possessed of increasing alarm with the adoption of Galba’s son into the imperial family. Whereas Galba had once been a staunch supporter and friend to Vopiscus, the young Caesar now doubted the older general's loyalty. To this end, he sought to secure marriage alliances with the remainder of the imperial family through his own progeny as well as that of Gaius, whom had been compliant with the political whims of both of his brothers for some time. His own son had been betrothed, and he thusly sought to employ the daughters of Gaius to these same ends; Gaius’ daughters would each be married to men from within the extended imperial family. His eldest daughter, Julia Prima, would be married to the son of Antonius Agrippa, whom was also called Antonius. His second daughter, Cornelia would be married to Publius Claudius Pulcher, the younger son of the former censor, Appius Pulcher. His third daughter, Agrippina Prima, would receive as a husband Lucius Marcellus, the consul of six years hence and whom was a distant cousin of the Caesars. His youngest daughter, Drusilla would be married to Paullus Lepidus, the son of Julia the Younger, whom himself was the brother-in-law of Vopiscus by his sister Aemilia. These marriages would not enter into effect for several years, as the daughters of Gaius were too young to be betrothed, but in the succeeding years, each of these men would become closer to the designs of Vopiscus, whom had provided them with blood ties to the family of Augustus.

The betrothal of the granddaughters of Caesar was accompanied by such grand festivities that it was said that the following day saw no man return to his place of work. At the end of these festivities and a brief period of public thanksgiving, the sons of Drusus and Vopiscus — Servius and Publicola — were sent to Spain with their imperial uncle, Gnaeus Domitius, where they might receive martial training in the style of their fathers and grandfathers. However, their wives did not accompany them, and were showered in Rome with gifts and banquets. Drusilla and Cornelia quickly became close friends and they sought advice from their aunt Cornelia, the wife of Gaius, whom was well acquainted with the rigors and luxuries of being a woman in the imperial household.

A second great elder statesman died in as many years in the spring months of that year. Gaius Cassius Longinus, whom had been an accomplished orator for many years, consul seventeen years hence with Gaius Claudius Marcellus. He had subsequently been the son-in-law of Agrippa, and the father of a daughter and three sons by his young wife Postumia. Although in his early career he was viewed as a man of unsavory and volatile character, the ousting of Gaius Vipsanianus during his own consulship enabled him to establish himself as a powerful advocate of Caesar from within the senate, hence his election to the censorship. He had made many great sacrifices for the good of the Empire, including the expulsion of his own brother from the senate for his transgressions. His funeral oration was delivered by his brother-in-law, Antonius Agrippa the Elder, after which his widowed wife, Postumia, refused to be married off to another senator. Antonius, whom was the paterfamilias of the Vipsanii, respected this wish, and she devoted her time thus forth to the care of her children, for which she earned considerable respect from both the senate and people. However, such grief had no place in the heart of Caesar, whom had never fully trusted Cassius in any case, and had arranged for his censorship only to pacify him and for his colleague Silanus to monitor him. In his place, an unusual candidate was selected. This man had been the consular colleague of Vipsanianus, but in the years since, his daughter had married Gaius, the son of Caesar, and he and his two brothers had become reliable allies of the Caesars. This man was Faustus Sulla, the son of Lucius Sulla whom was consul with Augustus and himself the grandson of the dictator. He commanded much respect among the senators and had labored tirelessly in the senate to ensure the fair trials of a multitude of their number in the various law courts in which corrupt senators were tried. His character was as stern as it was dedicated to the law, and there was no opposition to his election to the censorship.

However, this year also saw the first test of the martial skill of Aulus Plautius, whom was the imperator of Moesia in that year. The reticent Dacians had constructed periodic raids into Moesia to seize the assets of amber and slaves as well as wine. The Dacian capital had been destroy by Vipsanianus numerous years previously, and their state had significantly deteriorated and many of their men turned to banditry as a means of sustenance. However the imperator was aloof to these concerns, as indeed was Caesar, and halting the raids became a task of paramount importance. Numerous indecisive engagements ensued, as Plautius’ legates — Domitius Afer and Publius Crassus — were not men of substantial military capability. Plautius thus assumed direct command of the legions and engaged in a war of maneuver with the Dacians whereby he was able to position his troops at the top of a hill between the Dacian camp and the clearest path to their homeland, in an area known to them as the Fulminata Pass. The Dacians quickly attempted to negotiate, but their diplomats were captured and a battle swiftly ensued. The Dacians were routed after only a short time, and all those captured were sold as slaves, except for the ambassadors, who were set free that they might dissuade others from invoking the wrath of the legions.

However, near the year’s close, the freedman Claudius Primus sought for himself a greater degree of oversight over not simply his own bureau, but those of his colleagues such that upon the eventual accession of Vopiscus, they might together monitor these departments more closely. To this end, each of the departments was assigned a deputy whom was simultaneously the inspector general of that bureau. The sole exception to this was the general-secretaryship, which was held at this time by Marcianus Rex, and whom was a close personal friend of Caesar. The remainder of the secretaries, those of the treasury, of justice, of correspondence, and the capital, were each assigned a deputy in this way. Among the men raised to these offices were the freedmen whom had been manumitted by Tiberius the Elder during his time at Rome in the years preceding his flights from the city. These men, each of them named Tiberius, were surnamed Didius Aper, Vibius Proximus, and Domitius Castorianus, as well as several of their own political allies. These men would be the watchmen over abuses of power by the freedmen, and their relationships would define the bureaucratic operations of the Empire for the next decade.

EDIT: Fixed a few errors! My bad! It should be a more clear read now!
 
Last edited:
Well, seems that in Africa with the new troops any foreseeable menace if not dissuaded at least seems that would be easily managed and seems doubtful that, after their defeat, the Dacians would be able or willing to will do any more incursions through the border. The defensive politic in the East seems to be sound, but I think that after the end of the Parthians dynasty strife and if the victorious perhaps would attempt to put it to test. About Germany and notwithstanding the start of the formation of a German-Roman Provincial identity seems that, contrary to that could be expected that caused by the military situation and deploying of the Roman forces near the Germania's limes the Romanization would be faster and deeper the more near to the Albis especially in the north and northeast of Germany than in the center and/or the south...

Finally, though the compromise and agreement between the Cesar's heirs seems to be auspicious for the Empire stability and internal peace... I think that for the future would to worry that they still are distrusting and seems that even loathing each other. They would be surrounded by courtiers, counselors and especially clients the probably would be resentful and mistrustful from their Patron brother and from his own clients...
 
Well there's a lot to say, so let's get to it.

seems doubtful that, after their defeat, the Dacians would be able or willing to will do any more incursions through the border.

This is true in the short-term, but in the long-term, the Dacians' proximity to the empire combined with their own natural wealth will lead to a rapid population recovery and state formation. The northern frontiers of Rome saw escalating threats from barbarians beginning with Domitian's Dacian War and culminating in the eventual arrival of the Huns, and the factors underpinning this are largely environmental and contingent on the existence of the Empire, so they will occur ITTL just as they did IOTL. This will probably lead to a Dacian resurgence around the 110s-120s once a strong leader is able to assert some degree of control over the various tribes.

The defensive politic in the East seems to be sound, but I think that after the end of the Parthians dynasty strife and if the victorious perhaps would attempt to put it to test.

This is one of the most crucial point of TTL. I've based this hypothesis both on Peter Heather's "The Fall of Rome" and "The Grand Strategy of the Roman Empire". According to the latter, the client system in the East is much cheaper and more cost-effective in both the short and long terms, and this system was only ended by Vespasian because he feared a usurper rising with the eastern clients' support as he had. However, since no such usurpation has occurred, the client system will remain in place, increasing the empire's disposable manpower and enabling them to meet Parthian threats in kind. The effects this will have on Parthia are uncertain, and it is probable that even without such a long well-guarded border with Rome, the Parthian regime will collapse eventually. Once that happens and a Sassanid-like regime comes about, the Empire will be better prepared to meet the threats it presents because fewer legions will be required to garrison the entire border (as well as the northern borders). Since the rise of the Sassanids is at least one major factor that contributed to the Third Century Crisis, the overall mobility of the eastern armies is critical in addressing this. Of course, the trade-off is that the independent clients may attempt to leverage the Parthian threat as a means to get leniency or concessions of Rome, which will require the emperor to maintain a close eye on them.

near the Germania's limes

The OTL concept of "limes" does not exactly apply here ITTL. IOTL, these were developed during the reign of Domitian and solidified by Hadrian. However, in this case, most of the border fortifications are within the empire, rather than on the borders. The sole exception to this is the border with the Marcomanni, which will be garrisoned by a legion behind the natural mountain range in that area. IOTL, the limes, while a sound policy when they were conceived, robbed the army of it's mobility and flexibility, so that when the Sassanids escalated the eastern threat, the troops left to guard the Rhine and Danube were not sufficient to stop the migrations of groups like the Goths, Alemanni, Franks, and Vandals. In order to prevent this overreach, the border will not be garrisoned directly, but rather from a rear position well-connected to border towns by roads.

Finally, though the compromise and agreement between the Cesar's heirs seems to be auspicious for the Empire stability and internal peace... I think that for the future would to worry that they still are distrusting and seems that even loathing each other. They would be surrounded by courtiers, counselors and especially clients the probably would be resentful and mistrustful from their Patron brother and from his own clients...

Ssshhhh, don't spoil it. ;)
 
Thank for the answer though I have a doubt/question... Given that seems that eventually some kind of State would be formed in Dacia... Given that in OTL was contested and settled, but I think that the conquest only was 'successful' in created a new province and border to protect/defend...
Given that wouldn't be better if would be possible to try, in TTL to form and/or create some kind of clientilization or at least try to convert this 'tribal State' in a kind of buffer against the Steppe tribes?
 
Thank for the answer though I have a doubt/question... Given that seems that eventually some kind of State would be formed in Dacia... Given that in OTL was contested and settled, but I think that the conquest only was 'successful' in created a new province and border to protect/defend...
Given that wouldn't be better if would be possible to try, in TTL to form and/or create some kind of clientilization or at least try to convert this 'tribal State' in a kind of buffer against the Steppe tribes?

The conquest of Dacia IOTL was actually a sound strategic move. The cost of defending and garrisoning the province was vastly outweighed by 1) the material wealth of the country and 2) removing the Dacians as the dominant regional power North of the Danube. If, for example, Dacia had remained in a "client" relationship with Rome after Trajan's wars, then the Dacians would certainly have taken advantage of the Marcomannic Wars two generations later, and the empire may not have had the mobility or numbers to overcome the simultaneous invasions of the Marcomanni, Quadi, Iazyges, and Dacians. By annexing Dacia, the Romans remove the next-most-powerful state in the region, which would otherwise leverage the lesser peoples' fears of Rome into joining a coalition against them (like how Germany played on Eastern Europeans' fears of the Soviet Union in WWII to co-opt the support of countries like Romania, Bulgaria, and Finland in Operation Barbarossa who would not otherwise get involved in what was, at the time, an Anglo-German War). It may be possible for Dacia to exist as a client state, but the disposable manpower it would require to deter any armed conflict might outweigh the benefits received, and in that case, annexation is more cost-effective (even if it has to be abandoned again one day). Buffer states only work if both sides of the buffer are more powerful than the buffer itself (i.e. Armenia). In this case, the Dacians would be stronger than the Sarmatians, but not stronger than the Romans, thus they would be incentivized to use the Romans' fears of the Sarmatian nomads to gain concessions, and thus maintain a degree of autonomy, and do the same with the Sarmatians. In order to maintain them as a client, a certain amount of mobility would have to be sacrificed on the other frontiers (i.e. the Elbe or Spain or wherever). As the Dacian increasingly consolidated, more and more troops would have to be drawn from other frontiers (or simply raised from scratch, which is a whole other issue), which is only sustainable for so long. I'm not sure exactly how I want that dynamic to play out, but it's something I plan to do more research on.
 
Book 29: 46-47 CE
Book Twenty Nine - Passing the Torch

Execution.jpg

A former senator is executed after being convicted by Felix and Cotta

—In the consulship of Gaius Silius and Quintus Plautius…
Cotta followed in the footsteps of Antonius Agrippa — thenceforth called Agrippa, as he was the paterfamilias of the Vipsanian household — and occupied the praetorship patriae, in spite of that he had been consul in his youth. However, this was his first praetorship, as the reigning Caesar at the time, Gaius Vipsanianus, had disregarded the qualifications for office in order to ensure the loyalty of Cotta’s extended family. He was realized at this time with considerable ambition, upon which he had spent many of the intervening years ruminating. He joined his efforts with those of Felix Pius, Messalla Barbatus, Publius Vinicius, and Gaius Piso whom each shared a commonality. Their fathers had been exiled or killed in the wake of Caesar’s overthrow of his predecessor. However, they knew that Caesar himself was beyond their reach and instead resolved to exact vengeance upon the men and the descendants of whom had acted against Vipsanianus’ regime in the favor of Caesar. Plautius, the consul, entertained these designs, as his uncle was Cornelius Cethegus, whom was another of Caesar’s victims. They authored a law which made the unilateral action of such men to take up arms against the reigning Caesar or to convene tribunals whilst troops were present in Italy. Caesar was not in any position to oppose such measures, as doing so would encourage usurpation and show him as weak and insecure. With this measure in place, Cotta saw charges brought against the sons of many men whom had aided in the overthrow of his father. Among these men were the sons of Cotta Maximus’ former centurions, Servius Rutilius and Vorenus Merula, whom had gained senatorial seats for themselves in the interim. These men did not have the means to oppose such charges and fled to Achaea rather than face the wrath of the princes. However, men of such low stature were not the only victims of this purge. The former consul of eleven years hence, Scaurus Terentianus, was made to bear the full weight of the law and was thusly convicted and sentenced to death, although he appealed this sentence and fled into exile instead. This was done because Terentianus’ father, Mamercus Aemilius Scaurus, had betrayed the army of Cotta’s father when they faced Caesar in open battle in Illyricum during the schism. Also sentenced to exile was the former censor, Dolabella, although he fell ill and died before leaving the city; his son’s inheritance was confiscated into the military treasury. However, the other targets of these efforts were more fortunate to have powerful allies. The three sons of Gaius Cassius employed for their defense Appius Junius Silanus, the former censor, whom himself had escaped prosecution by the same court. They were all acquitted and the labors of Cotta were largely foiled in this respect.

Vopiscus, whom had spent the beginning of that year traveling around northern Italia to lavish donatives onto the loyal Italian legions whom had saved his life when he was captive inside Rome, returned to the great city at this time. Upon hearing of the exile of so many senators and the seizure of so much power by Cotta and Felix, he became furious. He styled himself as the master of Rome, as Caesar was elderly and Drusus was frequently on campaign in the provinces, and this perceived threat to his sole dominion would not be tolerated. Vopiscus was a man of fiery and capricious temperament, and his actions thereafter conformed precisely to this mold. He mounted the Rostra every day for several weeks and delivered chillingly veiled threats to Felix and Cotta, whom were prevented from retaliation in the own right by the tribunician authority of Vopiscus and that of his allies in the tribunate. Vopiscus assembled a council of his close friends and advisors, among whom were the former consuls Lucius Sentius Saturninus and Porcius Cato as well as the freedman Antonius Primus. These men wielded considerable power between themselves, both directly through their service in public office and indirectly through the immense respect they commanded among the senate, the legions, and the regime of Caesar. The urban prefecture had recently been vacated due to the untimely death of Sutorius Macro, and Vopiscus arranged for his replacement by Saturninus, whose elder brother had served in that same office just two years prior. He used this office to oversee the remainder of the trials in that year which would otherwise be delegated to the urban praetor, whom in that years was Silius Nerva, the younger brother of Gaius Silius the consul. Nerva was powerless to prevent this, and the legal machinations of Cotta and Felix were aborted by this undertaking. Vopiscus himself sought to bring Cotta to trial, although not Felix, whom he viewed as a lesser threat due to his ties to Vopiscus’ family. Caesar himself interceded at this time and chided his young son for his flagrant self-aggrandizement and demagoguery, after which Vopiscus became considerably less overt in his hostilities towards these men.

However, the undertaking of this judicial battle illustrated plainly to the powerful men of Rome that such flagrant exercise of power by Vopiscus would soon become impossible to deny by the aging Caesar, and several of these men, among whom were the illustrious allies of Caesar, sought refuge among the clientele of Drusus, whom was the only man able to challenge Vopiscus. Among these men were Galba, the father-in-law of Drusus, Quinctilius Varus, the consul of twelve years hence, and Junius Blaesus, the former imperator of Germania and consul of seventeen years hence. Many of these men enjoyed a personal friendship with Drusus, and numerous others had served with him in the legions and admired his valor in battle. However, the most powerful among these men was Aviola, whom had been serving as the magister peditum with his uneasy comrade, Galerius. Aviola had been the consular colleague of Caesar as well as censor and imperator. He was among the most decorated of all the senators. However, he came to fear the wrath of Vopiscus whom enjoyed a close camaraderie with Aviola’s most despised rival, Claudius Pulcher, with whom had served as censor. Pulcher himself had no patience for the idealisms and ambitions of the soldiery, with whom Drusus and Aviola were so acquainted. Pulcher’s ancestry from the most illustrious house of the old Republic as well as his son’s marriage to the granddaughter of Caesar made him a powerful man to be reckoned with, and even the wrathful Vipsanianus had cautioned against his prosecution, although this would be his downfall as Pulcher was among those to open the gates of Rome to the legions of Caesar during the Julian schism. However, Aviola himself was not without his own enemies, whom by necessity had become friends of Pulcher and of Galerius. The sons of Cornelius Sulla — Lucullus, Magnus, and Felix, all of whom had been consuls — were men of unparalleled loyalty to one another whom had remained comrades through the turbulent reign of Vipsanianus, the senatorial upheavals of Caesar’s early reign, and the civil wars of Agrippa and Surdinus, and the three men shared marriage ties with numerous illustrious families, including the Vibii, the Lentuli, the Junii, the Aemilii, and of course, the Julii. This latter connection was a tenuous one — the daughter of Lucullus had married Gaius Primus — yet the brothers remained steadfastly loyal to one another and to their kinsmen. Among these was Vopiscus, whose cousin-in-law by his wife Aemilia, Cecilia Regula, was the wife of Magnus. These men were creatures of the senate and mistrusted the freedmen secretaries and officer corps in equal measure, and saw the steerage of the state as their birthright; their great-grandfather was Sulla the dictator himself. In the wake of this tension, Drusus arranged for the marriage of Silius to his youngest sister, Drusilla, which greatly pleased Silius and filled the allies of Vopiscus with dread.

The freedmen as well, in that year, would become realized with ambitions above their station. Marcianus Rex, an equite and the secretary-general, was selected as the prefect of Italy on the death of Sutorius Macro, whom in addition to the urban prefecture served in this office. The Italian prefecture was a post with few administrative duties, however it was tasked with the crucial task of commanding and supplying the Italian legions in the absence of the consuls or any of Caesar’s legates. Rex, whom had served as a camp prefect in the legions during the schism, was well-equipped for this station, and he felt a great sense of relief as he departed Rome, as he was an aged man and did not desire to spend his twilight years embroiled in the power struggles of the young princes. His departure from Rome would have grave consequences, however. In his place, Paullus Fronto was made the secretary-general by Drusus where in his place, Vibius Proximus, the freedman of Tiberius the elder, was made the secretary overseeing the embassies to the barbarians. Immediately, Proximus sought that Caesar might install a contingent of imperial agents within the provinces which held legions yet were not led by his imperatores. These were few but included Africa, Aegyptus, and Syria. These three provinces were among the most crucial in the entire empire, and obliged this suggestion by Proximus, whom had thoroughly proven himself as an effective administrator of the public archives. This measure was met by considerable uproar from numerous provincial communities, including those of the Jews, whom in the years since the death of the Divine Augustus had fluctuated between government by their own kings and those of an imperial procurator. The subsequent unrest induced Gaius Caetronius, the governor of Syria to intervene with a legion of his own in that country. The Jews were cowed by this show of force, and Caetronius was awarded triumphal ornaments for his valor. Herod Agrippa was confirmed as the king in that country and the peoples therein were placated for a considerable time thereafter.

However, grief struck the hearts of the Romans in the late part of that year when the patron mother of the empire, Agrippina Augusta, fell ill and died in the imperial palace. Caesar was heartbroken, as his wife had remained at his side since their marriage in the time of the Divine Augustus, even throughout the civil wars in the interim in which Caesar had partaken. Her funeral procession drew all the denizens of the city and several surrounding cities. Caesar, all his sons, and all the husbands of his daughters — Cato, Domitius, and Silius — neglected to shave as a sign of mourning for the remainder of that year. However, her last words had been a foreboding prophecy. She claimed to have spoken this utterance to her sons as they embraced her on her deathbed, “My sons, do not be driven to one another’s throats by the courtiers and advisors who seek only the empire for themselves.” This plea for peace in the wake of her own death and the advanced ago of Caesar gave Drusus and Vopiscus pause. The two of them agreed to meet in the imperial palace in order that they might partition the responsibilities of empire. They had already elected to apportion the consulships and censorships among their own friends, however what remained was that the secretariat might be included in this bifurcation and thusly any vacancies would thus forth be filled by each of them in turn.

However, Caesar fell ill briefly in those same months, and Vopiscus was not satiated by this agreement and immediately sought to marginalize Felix and Cotta. Cotta by this time was still a sitting praetor, and was thus unable to be prosecuted, however Felix was brought to the court of Saturninus on charges of the illegal levying of troops in Italy, as he and his brother had done during the supremacy of Agrippa. Drusus was apoplectic at this and immediately intervened on their behalf, with his tribunician authority exceeding the prerogatives of Vopiscus in the law courts. Vopiscus and Drusus were both furious at their incongruous ambitions, and confessed this in private to their brother Gaius. Thus the year ended with a stalemate.

Funeral Pyre.jpg

The greatest funeral pyre yet seen in Rome's history is beset by citizens in mourning

—In the consulship of Gaius Lollius and Cossus Cornelius Lentulus Gaetulicus…
The princes of the Julian, Claudian, and Vipsanian houses saw fit to meet out of fear of another outbreak of civil war between the two of Caesar’s heirs. Attendant to this meeting, held once again in the household of Tiberius, were the sons of the Julian house — Paullus Lepidus, Felix, and Balbus the younger — as well as Gemellus, Agrippa, and Gaius Primus. Each of them enjoyed good relationships with one or both of the heirs, and thus their concurrence was that none of them would openly declare loyalties to one over the other, as any such actions undertaken would necessitate each of them doing so and would consequently make conflict inevitable. As an additional measure to ensure this, each of them swore an oath not to serve as the consular colleague of either Drusus or Vopiscus, as doing so would necessarily indicate any such allegiances.

Gaius sought the re-stabilization of the political situation in Rome. Thus, he wished a speedy removal of Drusus’ close allies from Rome where they might see greater complacency in the provinces, whether through administrative of military commissions. To this end, the consuls joined in their efforts to establish a series of extraordinary magistracies which might serve as intermediaries between the magistri peditum and the imperatores. These men, the Magister Oriens in the East and the Magister Occidens in the West, accompanied by their staffs, whom hereafter would be Appius Silanus in the West and Salvius Glabrio in the East. Likewise, men would be dispatched out to the provinces such that they might cultivate prestige for themselves without fear of the reprisals of Vopiscus, whom was himself dissuaded from leaving Rome. Otho and Galba were sent to the Danuvius and Africa, respectively, while Silius and Lucius Marcellus were assigned to the offices of the magister peditum. Aviola remained as a command officer in Illyricum rather than return to Rome, however his colleague Galerius returned to Italia, although he avoided an entrance to Rome in that year, as Vopiscus arranged for his election to the Italian prefecture in the next year.

However, during his tenure in Africa, Galba showed himself to be a vicious and spiteful man. The discontented merchants of the various nomadic barbarian tribes were subjected to considerable levies by Galba and by his quaestor, Caesennius Paetus. This, in addition to the seizure of the property of numerous African freedmen, whom he claimed had been unlawfully manumitted. An embassy of the leading men from Carthage, Lepcis Magna, Hippo, Utica, and several other cities was thusly dispatched to Rome to appeal these usurpations to Caesar, although these ambassadors, led by a certain Avidius Bassianus, was refused entry to the city due to the circumstances which had come to fruition during their journey.

Imperator Germanicus Caesar Invictus Augustus breathed his final breaths in the company of his sons and daughters in the latter months of that year. Drusus held his grief-stricken younger sisters in his arms as they wept for their father. He was judged to have fallen ill in his own grief for his wife, although some suspected one of his sons of poisoning him or even that he may have starved himself to death. These rumors are uncertain, but what is certain is that on the third day before the Ides of November, the death of Caesar was announced to the senate and people of Rome. He was sixty years old, and had ruled the Empire for nineteen years. According to the devastated Gaius, his youngest and most loving son, his dying words were, “Be mindful my sons, I’ve left far too many snakes with which you must now deal.” Drusus at once convened the senate and had the will of the late Caesar read to the senate. His two eldest sons were the primary beneficiaries, although all of the men related to the family of Augustus were given considerable properties and titles thereafter. His funeral was one which saw the entries city be absent of all public business for several days and which saw the largest funeral procession since the death of the Divine Augustus. His ashes were deposited into the Mausoleum of Augustus and a statue and altar dedicated to him was placed in the Temple of the Divine Drusus.

He was deified by act of the senate shortly thereafter, and his sons were confirmed as joint heirs to his legacy. They immediately sought to annul the previous year’s elections such that they might serve a joint consulship in the next year. The previous consuls-elect, Vitellius and Scipio, were both awarded consulships in the next year. At the close of the year, the two Caesars led a religious ceremony in honor of their divine father wherein the two men, in their capacity as pontiffs, appointed a number of patricians to the priesthoods of the Divine Invictus. The close of that year saw a symbolic closure of the Gates of Janus, as if to signal to all Rome and her Empire that peace would be the legacy of the only princeps never defeated in battle.
 
Last edited:
Book 30: 48-49 CE
Book Thirty - The Twin Caesars

Lynch mob.jpg

The Cassii brothers lead a mob to the court of Publius Vitellius (the praetor overseeing the corruption court) to try Lentulus Maluginensis

—In the consulship of Drusus Julius Caesar Germanicus for the Third Time as Augustus and Tiberius Julius Caesar Vopiscus Germanicus for the Third Time as Augustus…

The August family occupied all of the senior magistracies of the Empire. The Caesars were consuls while their brother Gaius was the chief praetor. The junior praetorships were occupied chiefly by the extended family of the Caesars. Drusus Livius, the son of Tiberius Livius, was the urban praetor while the great-grandson of Marcus Agrippa, Haterius Antoninus was the peregrine praetor. Among the other magistrates were Publius Crassus, son of the former consul, and Publius Vitellius, the cousin of Aulus Vitellius, whom was betrothed to the young Lollia Rufinia, the daughter of Lollius, and also the great-great-granddaughter of Augustus by his grandson Gaius Vipsanianus. Also serving in this year was Tiberius the Elder, serving in his third quaestorship in his career, the previous two of which were during the reigns of his father and grandfather. The censors in that year were Junius Blaesus — whom was due to marry Cassia Longina, the widow of Nero Caesar, whose second husband, Lucius Antonius, had recently died in Syria — and Paullus Lepidus, the uncle of the Caesars by their mother and son-in-law of Gaius by his daughter Drusilla.

With this confluence of powers at Rome, the sons of the Caesars returned to Rome from Spain with their relative, Domitius, whom had spent several years in an unofficial exile as a penalty for his avarice in Italia following the death of Agrippa. Domitius himself was of advanced age and had little patience, although this was unchanged from his younger years. He enjoyed friendship with Vopiscus Caesar, whom had prevented his prosecution, although his open disdain for Felix and his cousin Lepidus Paullus, led to his eventual retirement from public life. However, the recent disasters in Syria led Drusus Caesar to order that the Spanish legions be recalled and dispersed to these frontiers, and to Africa, which had seen recent unrest. With them went the elder Tiberius in his capacity as quaestor. At this time it is appropriate, and I have elected to intercede upon the narrative such that I might relay the scope of the men at arms commanded by Empire.

The fleets of the Empire defended Italia on both of her coasts, and a further multitude of ships were based at Carthage, Massilia, and Alexandria — although each of these had a limited scope of their domain. Fleets likewise patrolled the Pontic Sea, the Germanic Sea, and the Albis and Danuvius rivers. These, although subjected to the imperium of the princeps, were not subordinated to any other offices, except for the riverine and lesser fleets which fell under the imperium of the magistri of the East and West. The princeps was likewise advised by a number of equites whom had seen service for a great length of time in the legions whom themselves oversaw such tasks as the management of receipts to the military treasury, the supply of the legions on the frontiers, the payment of wages and of retirement disbursements to legionaries, the inspection of the legions’ readiness, and numerous other such menial domains. The remainder of the legions were commanded by the magistri pedita, whom in that year were Gaius Silius and Quinctilius Varus. Below these men were their staffs, their personal guards, an accompanying cohort of prefects and advisors, as well as the three magistri whom oversaw each of the great theatres of warfare. In the West was Appius Silanus, whom commanded an overwhelming strength of eighteen legions. However, he did not command these forces in the traditional manner of a magistrate with delegated imperium. This magistrate had no imperium and was tasked with purely administrative and bureaucratic roles within the apparatus of the legions. The command authority was derived from his three subordinates — the imperatores of Germania and Illyricum as well as the proconsul of Africa. In Germania there was a strength of seven legions, of which three were in Cisalbis, three were in Angilia, and one remained in Vindelicia. Along the Danuvius there resided nine legions of which four resided in Pannonia, one in Noricum, two in Dalmatia, and two in Moesia. Africa herself held two legions in addition to a significant force of auxiliae. However, the military forces in Italia were commanded wholly independently of the remainder of the western legions. The legions therein were under the purview of the consuls, or of the Italian prefect in their absence — except for the urban cohorts under the command of the urban prefect and the praetorian cohorts under the command of the two prefects thereover. The magister oriens, whom at this time was Salvius Glabrio, oversaw the fitness of the legions in the East, which were still commanded directly by provincial legates and prefects. Of the eight legions thereunder, five resided in Syria and the other three in Aegyptus. This made the total strength of the Empire’s legions that of approximately one-hundred-sixty-thousand, with accompanying forces of auxiliaries only slightly fewer in number.

The senate in that years was furthermore induced by its membership to laud upon the Caesars considerable honors, titles, and offices. The allies of Drusus Caesar, led by Blaesus and Galba, heaped upon him not only all the offices and titles of their father, but also those of censor in perpetuity, prince of the youth, fifteen triumphal ornaments for his years on campaign, and father of the country and of the world. The allies of Vopiscus Caesar, led by Galerius, would do the same, in addition to awarding him the powers and decorations of numerous lesser magistracies, calling him the “tribune of the city”, which gave him the powers of an aedile, censor, and a praetor in addition to his consular and tribunician authority. Having established the security of their regimes, the Caesars abdicated their consulships and were replaced in their offices. Drusus Caesar was succeeded by his adopted son, Servius, and Vopiscus Caesar was succeeded by Paullus Scaurus, the cousin of the ex-consul tried and executed by Felix and Cotta.

However, two deaths in the latter portion of that year roused the suspicions of Vopiscus Caesar and his allies. Firstly, the elderly and retired Domitius was found dead in his home of unknown causes, although many suspected the involvement of imperial freedmen, including Fronto and Carbo. This left Livilla, the sister of the two Caesars, widowed. Her hand in marriage served as a political expedient to a degree that precluded her continued isolation, and thus Vopiscus Caesar arranged for her marriage to Gnaeus Pompeius, the son of the former censor, whom was himself an energetic and capable young man with considerable clientelia. However, the second of these deaths was of far greater consequence, as the man whom was found dead was Galerius, the Italian prefect and twice consul. He had served as a staunch ally of Vopiscus Caesar during his youth and had shared a personal and political enmity with his elder brother. Drusus Caesar quickly replaced him with an equite, Justus Catonius, and thus secured greater control over the Italian legions outside Rome.

The political disturbance that resulted with the passing of so many powerful men connected to the imperial family — as in addition to Domitius and Galerius, Lucius Antonius, Lucius Marcellus, and Claudius Pulcher had died in recent years as well — led the men on the periphery of the august family to take action that might consolidate their political position and supplant their misfortunes with glories and gravitas. The first among these was Gaius Cassius, the eldest son of the former censor, whom launched at once upon a vigorous prosecution of Lentulus Maluginensis, a cousin of Lentulus Scipio and Gaetulicus. He was a man of vicious and cold character, and he had taken upon the opportunity of the suicide of Lucius Cassius to seize many of his assets both in Rome and in Italia. The upheaval of the civil wars and the mistrust for the Cassii at that time due to their relationship with Agrippa, led the Divine Invictus to allow such brazen seizures, despite that they were unlawful. Maluginensis was hauled before a senatorial tribunal overseen by Publius Vitellius, nephew of the consul-elect, and was thusly convicted of an array of crimes, some of which may have been fabricated. However, the consul Scaurus and Pompeius, whom was a distinguished man of the law courts, secured these convictions with their oratorial skill, and Maluginensis was hurled from the Tarpeian Rock. This led many men to fear the power of this emerging coalition. Vopiscus Caesar himself had overseen the trial and had barred entry to the court by any equites and numerous senators. His considerable power and alienation from numerous distinguished senators and freedmen made him a natural ally of Gaius Cassius, as well as his brothers Lucius and Quintus. Pompeius was likewise a kinsman of the Cassii by the marriage of his sister Pompeia, to Antonius Agrippa, the uncle of the Cassii by his sister Postumia. This alliance of kinsmen stood in array against that of Felix, Cotta, and Gemellus, whom themselves courted the favor of Drusus Caesar. In the center of this struggle for power lay many powerful imperial men, including Paullus Lepidus, Appius Silanus, and Quinctilius Varus. This equilibrium held for the remainder of the year, and the consuls resigned their offices without incident, however uncertainty clouded the senate house and many men of prominence elected either to seek no public office or to withdraw to their estates in Italia and forsake their birthright membership in the senate. These men included many of the Calpurnii and Lentuli, as well as several lesser families such as that of the elder Marcelli and the many cousins of the Vinicii. Thus the senate began to take shape in the mold of the two emerging factions — that of the elder Caesar, and that of the younger.

roman-diocles-highest-paid-athlete-history-mankind_1-770x437.jpg

A disaster unfolds on the Circus Maximus leading to several deaths

—In the consulship of Lucius Vitellius and Publius Cornelius Scipio…
Drusus Caesar saw that a multitude of his allies were elected to a number of honors and offices. The chief of these men were Sextus Mummius, whom was a Gaul from Macedonia, Quintus Baebius, whom was a Spaniard, and Clodius Macer, whom was of African descent. Each of these men was elected to a praetorship, and their ally, Pomponius Milo, whom was already a powerful man of Gallic descent, would be elected to the consulship in a few years. These men were vocal advocates of Drusus Caesar, whom already counted among his allies the most powerful generals of the whole Empire as well as the remainder of the elder statesmen whom had served his father. The elite from among the senate protested loudly the admissions of these men, whom they viewed as having vulgarized the distinctions of their offices which had been their ancestral birthright. However they assumed these seats in spite of the protests of such men as Messalla Corvinus and Quintus Plautius, both of whom had been consuls as well as the sons of consuls. The refuge of these men fell within one of two factions within the august family. The faction of Vopiscus Caesar counted among its ranks the distinguished families of the Cornelii — including the stripes of the Sullae, Dolabellae, Cinnae, Cethegi, Lentuli, and the Scipiones, whom were the most illustrious families of the old commonwealth — as well as the brothers of the Cassii, the men whom had gained distinction while serving as decemvirs, and the various wealthy Italians whom had gained membership in the senate. The tenuous balance of these factions was shattered in this year.

Gaius Aviola, whom was princeps senatus, joined hands with his colleague Appius Silanus in the authorship of a law which would prohibit the prefecture of Aegypt, or of any other province or jurisdiction, from being held by freedmen, in accordance with the ancient custom, which likewise barred such offices from the purview of the sons of freedmen. This law, passed by the consul Vitellius, was aimed primarily at Marcianus Rex, whom was a freedman of the Divine Invictus, although he had served as the Italian prefect and later as the prefect of Aegypt. He was serving in this capacity at the time of the Vitellian law’s passage, and he was thusly recalled to Rome. However, Rex himself had wished for his posting to serve as an early retirement. He had loyally served the Divine Invictus for his entire life, and did not wish for the discord between his sons to bring about his death or exile in the political upheaval that followed. Rex hesitated to return, although he eventually conceded that had he remained in his province, the overwhelming force of the Syrian legions would be brought down upon him, and so he returned to Rome early in the year. However, his hesitation did not go unnoticed by those in Rome, and Cato in particular denounced Rex for his non-compliance with the will of the Caesars. He was thus arraigned on charges of treason and conspiracy and hauled before the court of Gaius Primus whereafter he was convicted and executed. This served as a signal to each of the men whom had served with the Divine Invictus that neutrality was no guarantee of the safety of any freedmen, and quite probably, any eques or senator.

Also in that year, Tiberius the Elder served in his capacity as a curule aedile, although he was very senior to his five colleagues. He used his position as aedile to position himself within the emerging young senatorial faction, a number of whom were serving as aediles at that time. These men were Titus Vinius — whose father had wielded extraordinary power through his long friendship with Galba, though he had died in recent years — Caecilius Cilo, Junius Otho, Ulpius Trajanus — a young Spaniard — and Quintus Pompeius Macer, whom enjoyed a positive reputation among the friends of Gemellus and his father. These young men ingratiated themselves to Tiberius and to the family of the Caesars by undertaking the cost of public festivals on the birthdays and marriage anniversaries of various imperial family members. Tiberius himself abstained from public acclamations for these holy days, and was applauded for his humility and long life of statesmanship.

Scapula, the consul of ten years prior, was a man of unusual tastes with little respect for the dignity of the senate, as he himself was a novus homo and the son of an eques. He displayed this foremost by his participation in the chariot races which accompanied the festival surrounding the birthday of the Divine Invictus. This was unusual, although Drusus Caesar had come to respect him for his long service in the legions of Germania and his honest dealing, and thus he did not intercede and blocked any efforts from Vopiscus Caesar and other senators to do so. However, during the climax of these festivities, he suffered a crash in the Circus Maximus and was run over by the chariot of one Decimus Meridius Maximus, whom was famed for his ruthlessness, although he had never committed such a grievous crime as the murder of an ex-consul. He was thus harangued on charges of murder and treason, although he plead for leniency by a confession that he had been paid a sum of sesterces for the deed in question. However, when the praetor of the murder court, called Veranius Incitatus, whom was a friend of Gaius Primus, summoned him to deliver his testimony before the senate, he was himself murdered. Shortly thereafter, a freedman of the Caesars, one Domitius Aurelianus, whom was an agent of Claudius Primus, the superintendent of the occuli, which was the name for members of the praetorian cohorts whom were stationed in civilian dress to serve as informants for the principes, was likewise found dead. This aroused great suspicion by men whom had become accustomed to the steadfast support and protection of Drusus Caesar such as Lucius Otho, the consul of ten years hence with Scapula. Many suspected Vopiscus Caesar as the perpetrator of the murder, as it was widely known that he and Claudius Primus were closely associated. However, no action was taken pursuant to this allegation, and thus the friends of Drusus Caesar became insecure of the tenability of their own positions and offices.
 
Last edited:
Sorry for the slow pace of updates! It takes a lot of checking and double checking to make sure TTL is internally consistent and rational! My spreadsheet has morphed into a monstrous labyrinth of names and dates, and I hope the quality hasn’t dipped as of late. I have the rest of this chapter on an outline already, so it should be fairly simple to crank out the next two updates. Thanks for your patience!
 
Okay, so I'm now officially back from my research sabbatical. I've been doing plenty of reading on the latter Julio-Claudian period, and I feel adequately prepared to write more on this period, so expect updates soon! If anyone's interested, here's what I've been reading:

Claudius, by Levick
Nero: Emperor and Court, by Drinkwater
69 AD, by Morgan
Constituting Autocracy, by Roller

And all these wonderful books from Rutledge History publishers:
-Aspects of Roman History
-From the Gracchi to Nero
-The Roman World: 44 BC - AD 180
-Greek and Roman Historians
 
Book 31: 50-52 CE
Book Thirty One - The Armenian War

Aviola.jpg

Gaius Aviola, one of the primary architects of Germanicus' regime and his most trusted political ally

—In the consulship of Gaius Suetonius Paulinus and Aulus Caecina Paetus…

The city of Rome was under duress. The consuls of the previous year had both been close associates of Vopiscus Caesar, and the political upheavals of that year did not go unnoticed by his elder brother, engaged with the politics of the provinces though he may have been. He had overseen personally the elections of that year’s magistrates on a session of the senate during which Vopiscus Caesar himself had been absent. The prior consul, Paulinus, was an unobjectionable man of considerable martial skill whom had served honorably in the Syrian and African legions during the reign of the Divine Invictus. However, the posterior consul, Caecina, was a close friend and associate of Felix and Cotta, with his father having served as a censor of Gaius Vipsanianus. The younger Caecina was a man of fiery and vengeful character, in contrast with the temperance and levelheadedness of his father, and had been recalled from his service in the German legions because of his unduly retributive disciplinary practices. Likewise, the chief praetors in that year were Gaius Saturninus, the son of the consul, and Julius Vindex, an Aeduan nobleman whom had seen his ambitions realized under the auspices of his patron Caesar.

These actions were undertaken by Drusus Caesar in order to strengthen his position among his own allies, which had wavered due to his inaction in the previous year. However, the elder Caesar’s heart remained forever with the legions, much as had his father’s and grandfather’s. He disdained the city of Rome itself and preferred to leave its governance to his trusted friends and allies, while he oversaw the legions in their castra personally. He thusly arranged to depart Rome, leaving behind his freedmen Fronto and Carbo and the elder censor Blaesus to secure his interests from being undermined directly. His entourage included the ex-consuls Aulus Plautius, Didius Gallus, and Flavius Sabinus, as well as their young sons whom were all destined for consulships in their time. The elder Caesar’s successes in Germania in the preceding years had realized only a portion of his dreams for the Empire. For although he disdained the pursuits of scholars and historians, he had keenly observed the tribulations of his father in Illyricum, and at the time of his service there, the Divine Invictus had relayed many of his own concerns with regard to that frontier. The Germans were quiescent in this new world, he is said to have relayed, whereas, “The Illyrians hold the beating heart of the army. Hold this land dearly, for it cost the last tyrant his throne.” This was in reference to the crucial part played by the Illyrian legions of Agrippa during the civil war against Vipsanianus. The gradual escalation of the threat of the Dacians and Sarmatians over the last two decades only served to confirm this view for Caesar, and he thusly sought to secure these lands for himself.

However, while Drusus Caesar was away, the faction of his brother would not remain idle. Their accomplishments in the previous year — including the execution of Lentulus Maluginensis, the removal of Marcianus Rex as the praefect of Aegyptus, and if rumors are to believed, the death of Scapula — had emboldened them to assail more prestigious adversaries. Although Vopiscus Caesar was in Macedonia at this time distributing gifts of Roman citizenship to local magistrates and addressing petitioners, his allies in the senate, led chiefly by Glabrio, the consul of ten years hence whom had recently retired from a successful posting as the magister orientis, were active on his behalf. Salvius Glabrio and Marcus Cato conceived a plan by which they might siphon the support of the elder Caesar’s primary beneficiaries. These were the provincials, whom had risen through the ranks of the equites in the army and been awarded with senatorial postings thereafter for their service. This cohort of senators were strongly loyal to one another, having faced concerted opposition from the Italian nobiles to their ascendancy. Chief among these men was Pomponius Milo, whom was strongly loyal to his patron, Drusus Caesar, but he was absent from Rome at this time serving as the governor of Syria in that year, and thus the chief men of this faction were Sextus Mummius, the consul-elect, Julius Fulvus, whom was praetor in the consulship of Corvinus and Allenius, Annius Pollio, a wealthy Spanish orator and poet, and the serving peregrine praetor, Julius Vindex. Among these men, Mummius was the most principled and thus unlikely to collaborate with the agents of the younger Caesar. The pair thusly employed a tribune, Quintus Labienus, the grandson of the disgraced historian and great-great-grandson of the comrade and enemy of the Divine Julius. Labienus was an orator of considerable skill and cunning wit, having been trained in this respect by the famed lawyer, Julius Africanus, whom was himself a disciple of Marcus Lepidus. He engaged in a series of prosecutions under the purview of his brother-in-law, Marcus Lucceius, whom was the praetor of the corruption court in that year, of the most vigorous opponents of the admission of provincials into the senate. These were the Messallae clan, whom had been one of the most illustrious families of the Empire since before its inception. The grandsons of Messalla Barbatus whom were called Corvinus, the consul of eight years hence, and Niger, whom was consul-elect in that year, were harangued on charges of corruption, and although they were acquitted, the counsel for their defense, one Vettius Bolanus, was exiled for bribery in its aftermath. Changing tactics, Labienus and Lucceius sought convictions from other men of status, though not of consular rank. Gaius Metellus was exiled for having abused his powers as proconsul of Narbo several years prior, and Quintus Titius was likewise exiled for poor conduct in Sicilia, a conviction that was especially easy to secure because of the dishonor brought upon his family by his father and grandfather.

However, these and likewise seizures of power undertaken by the new prefect of the guard, Vedius Pollio, became too great for the elder statesmen to remain idle. Gaius Aviola, the princeps senatus and among the post powerful men in Rome convened a session of the senate whereupon he denounced the consuls for their inaction, denounced the censors for their apathy, and denounced the praetors for their complicity. During this speech he entered such a frenzy that his face swelled and he was forced to quit the senate house. He recovered quickly, and while the senate was still meeting, he mounted the Rostra and repeated his denunciation before onlooking throngs. The praetorian guard and urban cohorts alike would not seize him, in spite of their orders. He was the sole surviving scion of the illustrious Calpurnii, and had been the chief lieutenant of the Divine Invictus for his entire reign, and the loyalty of the troops to his memory was strong. They defied the orders of Vedius Pollio to arrest him, and instead the praetorians assembled at the base of the Rostra and around the Curia to prevent any of the senators from leaving the senate house and confronting him directly. When Aviola’s voice reached a fever pitch at midday, he collapsed onto the ground. His slaves rushed to his aid and carried him to his home, but he was dead within mere hours. A public funeral was hosted for him the next day at which his son, Calpurnius Bestia delivered a eulogy.

Glabrio and Cato moved quickly at the news of Aviola’s death. He had been one of the last surviving members of the Divine Invictus’ inner circle to remain untouched by the escalating court politics of the recent years, and thusly, no other man stood in the way of the ambitious jackals to jockey for the reigns of the state. Having secured the exiles of Metellus and Titius, both of whom had vocally opposed and physically blocked the entry of Julius Vindex into the senate house during his quaestorship, Vindex himself became more likened to the friends of Glabrio. In particular, there was one man whom Vindex hated above all others due to his haughty demeanor and arrogant disdain for the provincials. That man was also the father-in-law of the elder Caesar and one of the most powerful men of the Empire — Galba. Vindex’s disdain for Galba was such that when Galba had traveled to Lugdunum as the head of a senatorial embassy to the Gauls, Vindex had abstained from attendance at a banquet. Many other wealthy Gauls did the same, and Galba’s banquet was attended by merely two chiefs, the youngest and least respected druids, and a host of women. For this, Galba was made into a laughingstock across Gaul for his failure to court their favor. The Gauls called him the “King of Massillia” implying his authority was not respected but for the sole Greek city across the whole of their country. By courting the favor of the Divine Invictus, Galba had secured a governorship over the majority of Gaul in the years following, and he extorted considerable levies and taxes from the Gauls, in addition to abolishing their civil councils for his time as governor — though they would be reconstituted as he departed for Rome. Having patiently awaited retribution, the Gauls in the senate in this year brought the full force of their wrath upon the old patrician. As a group, the Gauls in the senate constituted a portion of wealth far greater than their proportion of that body’s numbers, and thus their vast sums of gold and silver filled the pockets of the jurors in the senate, who thusly convicted Galba of extortion and saw to his exile to Gaul. This final humiliation proved too great, and Galba committed suicide rather than face this ignominy in the face of the men he so despised.

Felix and Cotta, though they did not particularly care for Galba, saw the threat that his downfall posed to their own safety. Their own friends, the Messallae had suffered at the hands of the opposition in court, and the men of the Julii decided on drastic action. They enlisted the help of Caecina and Gaius Primus, the younger brother of the Caesars to secure provincial commands for them such that they would evade the reach of Vopiscus Caesar, whom had recently returned to Rome, and whom lauded the statesmanship of Labienus and Lucceius for their political prosecutions. Fortunately for Felix and Cotta, circumstances in the East intervened and they were able to leave the city. The recent claimant to the Arsacid throne, Vologases, had seized upon the death of Armenia’s king and instilled his own brother, Pacorus, as the Armenian monarch under the name Tigranes. Drusus Caesar was alerted of this by Milo, whom was passing through Illyricum on his way to Rome to serve as consul, and he immediately sent for his most trustworthy generals to congregate in Syria for the coming war. He brought with him two legions from the Danuvius and sent orders for additional auxiliaries to be drawn from Galatia and Thrace. Felix and Cotta departed as soon as they heard with the powerful generals Corbulo and Silius. However, Vopiscus Caesar did not wish for all of his brother’s allies to join the eastern legions in unison, and thusly he dispatched his ally Vergilius Capito to serve as the praefect of Aegyptus.

In this great absence of powerful men from Rome, one rose above all the others in both ambition and energy to become the urban prefect and broker between the disparate factions of the Caesars. Agrippa had been complaint with the wishes of the Caesars in recent years, however, with all the other Julian men departing for Syria and so many senators living in the shadow of Vopiscus Caesar’s iron will, Agrippa was poised to become the moderating influence in the city. His cousin and brother-in-law, Paullus Lepidus, the censor, arranged for Agrippa to be made prefect of the vigiles, a post usually reserved for an eques, but in this role, he personally financed the expansion of aqueducts into the center of Rome, where periodic fires had proved a sporadic terror of the urban plebs. He renovated several temples including the Temples of Augustus and Drusus as well as the Altar of Peace. He likewise followed in the footsteps of his adoptive grandfather, Tiberius the Elder, and patronized a number of young senators whom themselves permeated the austere house with a moderating influence that sought to blunt the open hostilities between the traditional aristocracy and the novi homines of Drusus Caesar. Agrippa joined hands with another of the wealthy statesmen of Rome, Sulla Felix, whom was the sole surviving heir to that great family out of his brothers, whom had long served the Caesars since the days of their father whom was consul with the Divine Augustus. Through his extended family, which included the sons and daughters of his two deceased brothers as well as his sister, he commanded what was perhaps the largest network of clients in all of Rome. The men whom counted him as their patron included those of many prestigious families including Lucius Vipstanius, son of the consul, Gellius Publicola the decemvir, Publius Cicero, descendant of the orator, Cinna, the soon-to-be consul-elect, and Sisenna Statilius Taurus, sole inheritor of his great-grandfather’s fortune, which was considerable, as he had been the consular colleague of the Divine Augustus. These men soon filled the praetorships and would shape Rome for many years to come.

Parthian cavalry charge.jpg

The Parthian heavy calvary charging with the support of mounted archers in the rear, a common tactical maneuver

—In the consulship of Appius Valerius Messalla Niger Claudianus and Aulus Pomponius Milo…
The inaction of the censors ceased by their decision to resolutely evaluate the membership of that body and expel many unruly and parasitic hangers-on. Paullus Lepidus was the instigator of this effort, as he had grown in his antipathy for the ingratitude and rapaciousness of many in that austere body, and he induced his colleague Blaesus to cooperate in his efforts. By stipulation of the Julian law on the censors, the pair need not secure any criminal convictions requisite to these expulsions, and their mutual consent was sufficient on its own. The first of the men they subjected to this revision were men whom had already suffered disgrace in their families and did not enjoy the support of the wider senate. They announced, on the Ides of Februarius, that the membership of the senate would be under review coupled with the first eight men to be expelled. The only notable man of this group was Annius Seneca, a haughty and irreverent Spaniard who was not well-liked or respected, and had earned the disdain of his father-in-law, Avidius Quietus. The remaining senators offered little opposition to this, although the disgraced Seneca appealed to Vopiscus Caesar, who announced that the law was not his purview to overturn, having been authored by his grandfather. Thus concluded the first of many revisions of the senate by the censors since the days of the Divine Drusus. The censors then saw fit to direct their powers at the nobiles whom had fallen out of favor or suffered disgrace in their families. The elder brother of the exiled Galba, Gaius, was among those stripped of rank, even though Galba was an ex-praetor. Also expelled from office were the brothers of the Aruntii Aquilae, even though their grand-uncle, Camillus Scribonianus was the princeps senatus; also discharged was Marcus Nerva, the nephew of Octavius Laenas, the ex-consul whom had committed suicide rather than face disgrace in trial. The final, and most prestigious victims of this purge were the brothers Quintus and Marcus Lepidus, whom were the grandsons of the orator, consul, and censor, and whom had only risen to the praetorship but commanded outsized influence due to their lofty ancestry. They raised considerable vigor at this affront, especially from their kinsman Paullus, but it was to no avail. The memory of Lepidus the orator was not one that rallied any great sympathy from the sycophants and grovelers whom had filled the senate in the preceding years, and when this revision was complete, the abject subjugation of the senate to the power of the Caesars was absolute.

The only senators whom appeared above the fray of this public subordination were the kinsmen of the Caesars themselves. The vacation of so many prestigious men from the senate forced that body to make exemptions to those unqualified for office such that the magistracies every year were filled. Thusly, many men in their early twenties, including the young brothers of the Cassii, had ascended to the praetorship at this time in spite of their youth. However, as an affront to the intransigent censors and the absentmindedness of the consuls, a young praetor named Servilius Vatia, whom was of the highest patrician ancestry, organized the consular elections for the next year and saw the election of Vettius Bolanus and Vespasius Pollio. This was a direct affront to the regime of the Caesars as well, for they had predetermined the consuls for the next several years by a process of formal recommendation by an electoral college which had been assembled by lot, although it was widely know that its members enjoyed gracious benefits from the Caesars in exchange for their compliance. As this assembly of the senate had nearly drawn to a close, with the censors being unable to leave due to an intervention by the tribunes, the praetorian guardsmen burst into the curia with their patron Vopiscus Caesar. His ally and prefect Vedius Pollio had learned of this seditious assemblage and summoned the younger Caesar with all haste, who dissolved the senate and placed the seditious consuls-elect under arrest. They were later acquitted, but their disgrace in this affair precluded any return to public life and they both retired to their estates in Italia.

Vopiscus Caesar at this time, had received numerous reports from his subordinates in the East as well as his brother, and he was raised to considerable alarm by their omens. The young Caesar called upon one of Rome’s greatest generals, Gaius Lollius, the consul of four years hence to take command of the Syrian legions, securing for him a grant of maius imperium over the provinces of Syria, Cilicia, and Cyprus. He marshaled his considerable wealth and resources, earned as well as gifted for his service in the Germanic wars, and departed the city with an entourage of his kinsmen. This was a boon for the young Caesar as well, for Lollius was the nephew-in-law of Felix Pius by his cousin Julia Rufinia, and among his entourage, in addition to Felix and Cotta, was the powerful and respected ex-consul Gaetulicus, as well as many of Drusus Caesar’s ex-praetors of provincial origin. During the course of the escalating Parthian War, Vopiscus Caesar had assumed the command which had been denied to him since his consulship — he was the undisputed master of Rome.

The situation in the East had rapidly deteriorated. In the preceding two years, intermittent civil unrest in Armenia had enabled the Arsacid king of Parthia to march into that country under the pretense of a liberator, all the while subjecting the proud Armenians to his tribute. This was followed by still greater usurpations by the new Arsacid king of Armenia, whom demanded a levy of troops in his country for the reclamation of territory that was constituent to the mountain kingdom by birthright. His army had driven out the king of Lesser Armenia, Antiochus Gordianus, and menaced the Pontic shores. The seizure of Armenia itself was grounds enough for war, having been a violation of the treaties established by the Divine Augustus during the Armenian wars under his auspices, but these brute displays would not go unanswered. Drusus Caesar, whom at that time was at Sirmium, sent his capable aides, Vergilius Capito, Ventidius Bassus, and Coelius Rufus to assume total command of Aegypt from whence it might serve as the supply depot of the upcoming war. Before departing for Antioch, the elder Caesar ordered new fortifications and watchtowers to be built along that bend the Ister, and left his capable lieutenants Didius Gallus and Quintus Plautius, the consuls of six and five years hence, respectively, in the command of the Illyrian legions and made for Syria with all speed. On his arrival, he dismissed the magister oriens, Lucius Saturninus, the consul of ten years hence, and assumed general command over the provinces of the east, superseding Lollius and placing him in direct command of the legions. However, he eschewed his predecessor’s practice of leaving the legions to the command of his subordinates and resided in the castrum of the Legio XIII Augusta Invicta.

The force in Syria, which had quickly swelled to include eight legions, was commanded by Lollius, who employed as his lieutenants, the capable generals Silius and Corbulo, as well as the wealthy equite and tactician, Claudius Stolo, whose father was a freedman of the Divine Tiberius. Also at his table was the knowledgable young Livius, the son of Tiberius the Elder, whom had served only as quaestor but whom was easily the most learned man in Rome on the affairs of the East, having spent many of his early years attendant to his father and uncle, Lucius Vipsanianus, in Syria and Cappadocia. The legati of this force were a peculiar assemblage of persons, whom owed their position more to political favors than any conspicuous command ability. By far the most capable of these men was Licinius Mucianus, a young eques whom had been adopted by Licinius Nerva and seen many years of service in the Syrian legions, but the remainder of the legati were Felix Pius and Cotta, whom commanded the most prestigious legion, the XX Deiotoriana, Lucius Asinius Gallus — a young ex-praetor whom was untainted by the shame in his family — Veranius Incitatus, the aedile of two years hence, Gaius Caetronius, a close friend of Silius, and several provincial novi homines who were favorites of Drusus Caesar from their time in the Germanic legions. However, many of these officers and troops had become unaccustomed to regular combat with the Parthians and thus had to be drilled up to the standard of readiness to which the officers had been accustomed with the Germanic legions. This would take time, and in the interim, Drusus Caesar ordered a general levy of troops from Rome’s allies across the Empire. Men from quarters as diverse as the Batavia, Mauritania, Galatia, and Arabia would be assembled in Syria for the reclamation of Armenia, and when joined by the bulk of the Aegyptian legions, this force numbered a total of sixty-thousand men with numerous cavalry as well. The force divided itself into three columns. The first of these was a diversionary force, sent to menace the cities of Mesopotamia and engage the bulk of the Parthian’s strength therein. This force of three legions was led by Felix and included a large portion of the cavalry such that it might easily disengage from whichever army might seek their destruction. The second of these columns was lightly armed and consisted only of a single legion and the remainder of the cavalry. This force, led by Veranius Incitatus, served to forestall any major counterattack by the Parthians and would patrol the supply lines of the third and final column. This was the primary offensive force, consisting of four legions and several cohorts of the praetorian guard. Drusus Caesar himself commanded this force, accompanied by his his provincial lieutenants, the freedman secretary Paullus Fronto, and his son Servius.

On the Kalends of Aprilis, the legions of Felix marched into Osrhoene, the westernmost kingdom held by the Arsacids. They raided and laid waste to numerous cities including Edessa and Amida, dispersing the meager defense forces mounted by the king of Osrhoene and accruing reinforcements from defections and from levies undertaken by Alexander, the king of Commagena. The forces of the Parthian king’s youngest brother, Tiridates, shadowed this force, but did not engage them directly due to their inferior numbers. While this force was otherwise engaged, the primary force of the legions marched into Armenia through Cappadocia, gaining the full support of the Cappadocian army, which was the largest of the Anatolian kingdoms. This force quickly dispatched a relief army mustering under the King of Sophene, one Sohaemus, and marched straight for the Armenian capital, Artaxata.

The army of Tigranes was engaged partially in a war against the Iberians, whom were friends of the Roman people, and when he heard of this development, he rapidly withdrew to defend the city. However, the legions arrived at Volandum concurrently with Tigranes’ entry to Artaxata, and in spite of the mildness of their resistance to the legions, Volandum was put to the torch and many of its inhabitants were sold into slavery. On hearing this, Tigranes marched immediately to intercept the army of Caesar, but the cavalry of Incitatus engaged their rear, forcing them to retreat to a defensible hilltop a few miles to the west of the capital. Here, the Armenians watched helplessly as the legions encircled and besieged their prestigious seat of government. They twice attempted to counterattack the besiegers’ flank, but were twice repulsed and retreated southward. Their primary aim in this was to rendezvous with the main Parthian army, which had meanwhile been occupied suppressing a revolt of the Hyrcanians — an independent mountainous people whom warred intermittently with the Arsacid kings. The legions would remain at the siege of Artaxata through the winter and into the next year, and the war would continue as the Armenians remained undeterred by the resolve of their former patrons. As the year closed, the legions of Felix, having accomplished their primary aims, marched North, leaving the uncoordinated Parthian army to restore order to Osrhoene. They engaged the Armenian militias outside of another major city, Tigranocerta, which was in the southwesterly portion of that country. The legions had won overwhelming victories, yet the Arsacids were resolute in their conviction to wrest control of Armenia from their rightful masters.

Haughty patrician family.jpg

Pompeia, the wife of Agrippa, travels in Rome with her two children, Agrippa the younger and Vipsania

—In the consulship of Sextus Mummius and Lucius Verginius Rufus…
Agrippa was elected to the urban prefecture, and the young Publius Cicero, the sole inheritor of the orator’s legacy, assumed the office of praetor patriae. This was seen by many among the senate as a victory for their Italian order in opposition to the provincial magnates admitted to their body by Drusus Caesar. Sextus Mummius in particular, had suffered several indignities from the senators in Rome, even being blocked from entering the curia by an obstinate tribune. Gaius, the young brother of the Caesars, saw to it that each of the consuls were attended by a contubernium of the praetorians in their lorica segmentata, in addition to their consular lictors, and were thus able to travel about the city unimpeded. Verginius Rufus in particular was a close friend of both Gaius and his brother Vopiscus Caesar, and enjoyed their companionship as well as political support. He was the protege of Camillus Scribonianus, the princeps senatus and former commander of the Italian legions during the Marcomannic war, and the support of Camillus was sufficient to win for him considerable honors. This sycophancy was denounced by Appius Messalla, the consul of the previous year and the elder son of the censor Appius Pulcher. He served in that year as the Italian prefect, and thus enjoyed the considerable support of the Italian legions, which at that time numbered four in total, and he leveraged this as a means of securing what he viewed as his own birthright by inheritance of the Claudian house. Very few senators saw fit to oppose him, especially as his young brother Publius was the son-in-law of Gaius Primus. However, his intransigence set him in array against both of the Caesars, and at his brother’s instigation with the support of Milo, he stripped Messalla of his command and recalled him to Rome. Mummius induced the orator Labienus to bring him to trial for majestas under the auspices of Ulpius Trajanus, whom was himself a Spaniard and the victim of many abuses hurled by the ex-consul. The outcome of this trial was not in doubt, and Messalla committed suicide before its conclusion. His ominous last words were reported to the senate by one of his slaves, “The house of the Sabines will not be so easily snuffed out. So long as one of us remains, my kinsmen will surely be your masters.” Such was Labienus’ renown among the men of the senate, that Mummius arranged for his election as the next chief praetor. This move incurred fear from many, who were wary of his ambitions and vigor, which reminded many of the now-deceased Gaius Cassius — a man of passion and vengeance for whom loyalty held little stock.

The children of the August house were many, and I shall now relay their number and statuses to you. The house of Drusus, the most prolific of the Divine Augustus’ descendants, had produced three sons and three daughters, all of which had sired still more children. Drusus Caesar, although he had lost his son Nero, had fathered two daughters by his wife Julia Augusta, Drusilla and Agrippina, whom were betrothed to Servius Caesar and Furius Camillus, the sons of men whom were close associates of the Divine Invictus. Vopiscus Caesar and his wife Lepida, the sister of the censor Paullus Lepidus, had only a single son, Tiberius Publicola, whom was married to the granddaughter of Cornelius Dolabella the censor by whom he would sire three sons and one daughter in the coming years. Gaius was the most prolific of the Drusillans, having fathered two sons and four daughters, all of whom were betrothed to the most aristocratic families of the senatorial nobility. Faustus and Marcus, his sons, were married to Claudia Gemella, the granddaughter of Drusus Nero the censor and to Cornelia Cossa, whose brother had been consul five years hence with Lollius. His daughters were married to men on the stature of Agrippa’s son, the paterfamilias of the Pulchri, Paullus Lepidus the censor, and the sole of the Asinii in good favor with the Caesars, Saloninus. Agrippina the younger had been with many husbands in recent years, with whom only the latter, Marcus Cato the former decemvir and consul, produced any children. Their daughter Porcia was married to Fabius Persicus the ex-consul and by this time, they had produced one daughter and Agrippina was pregnant with their son, named Fabius Macedonicus for his illustrious ancestors. Julia Livilla had likewise been betrothed to four men and by this time had birthed children by all of them. her first husband, Gaius Solus, the son of Lucius Vipsanianus, had been butchered in the palace with his father when Felix took Rome from Agrippa, and she had subsequently wed Cornelius Scipio, then Domitius Ahenobarbus, and finally Gnaeus Pompeius. She had produced three daughters and three sons, of whom only Gaius Solus did not have a male heir. The last of the Divine Invictus’ daughters, Drusilla, was married to the illustrious general Gaius Silius and had given him two sons, Gaius and Publius. Of these men, Servius and Publicola were the apparent heirs of the Caesars, although Servius' tenuous claim to the August office led many to suggest that one of Drusus Caesar’s many nephews might be more appropriate heirs. Although, none of his brothers-in-law would ever suggest such a thing openly, as to do so would be to court sedition and exile.

The secondary house of the Julii, having fallen from favor with the rise of the Divine Invictus, had seen their number reduced considerably by the violence of the preceding year. Of their number, only one male heir remained, Lucius Pius, the son of Felix, and his son Octavius Pius, whom was to be born in the following year. Felix’s sister, Julia Augusta, was the wife of Drusus Caesar, and his nieces by the deceased Marcus Rufus had wed illustrious husbands of their own, Gaetulicus and Lollius, although none of them produced male heirs. The lesser Julii, descended from Lucius Vipsanianus, had intermarried with the Claudii. The sole surviving child of Lucius, Aurelia, was wed to Gemellus, the daughter of Nero the censor, and their son Gaius Nero had been betrothed to Domitia, the daughter of the general Corbulo. The collateral branch of the Julii, descended as they were from Julia the younger, included the elder censor Lepidus, whom had not yet fathered any children as his daughter Drusilla was too young, and Balbus Minor, the consul of eighteen years hence whom had married Vibia Postumia, the daughter of the disgraced ex-praetor Vibius Lamia and produced a son, Laelius Macer, and two daughters. However, the most prolific house of the August family was that of the Vipsanii. The children of Agrippa Postumus had been arranged to marry into the most illustrious families of their day. Aquileanus had married the daughter of Nerva the censor, Postumia had been wed to Gaius Cassius, and Antonius married Pompeia, also the daughter of a censor. Postumia’s children were four, of whom her sole daughter had married Lucius Antonius and then Blaesus the censor by whom she had a total of five children — Marcus Antonius Primus, Marcella Antonia, Jullus Antonius, Junia Popilia, and Blaesus the Younger. Longina’s three brothers were betrothed, as has been aforesaid, to the daughters of Gaius Primus, Crassus Dives, and Scipio by Livilla. Between the three of them would be born nine sons and five daughter, although only three of their sons would survive to adulthood. The elder Agrippa had one son and one daughter, whom had married the daughter of Primus and Quintus Labienus respectively, and he had adopted his nephew, Aquila, whom married the granddaughter of Torquatus the censor and borne three daughters. Of all these, the descendants of Livia, only one lineage, that of Tiberius the Elder, had not married into the descendants of Augustus, except for his daughter Antonia, whom had been the wife of Agrippa Postumus.

The younger Caesar in that year saw fit to dispatch his son to Syria in order to assist with the administrative burden of that region during such a time of war. With him traveled a number of imperial administrators and freedmen, whom were tasked with the arduous process of securing the grain supply from Aegyptus to Syria and from there to the legions in Armenia. However, these agents had a secondary purpose, for they were all personally loyal to Vopiscus Caesar rather than to his elder brother. Their secondary mission was to undermine the commands of Drusus Caesar’s subordinates and to secure allies for their own patron, whom envisaged a grand command in the East in the aftermath of the war during which time he might secure control of the grain supply and the portoria as leverage against his brother to secure the succession for Publicola against Servius. However, in the interim, with the grain supply secure, the legions of Drusus Caesar set about in their work of reducing the Armenians.

The siege of Artaxata by this time was in its final throes, and envoys from the city were sent to negotiate with the legions, whom were given the ultimatum of an unconditional surrender and an opportunity for flight from the doomed capital. The bulk of the army retired to rejoin Tigranes in the East, while the legions stormed the city and burned it. However, Drusus Caesar and his officers knew that the capture of the capital was meaningless so long as the usurper king was free to act as their sovereign, and thus, he set about in a pursuit of the Armenian army. They met the legions in battle with their Parthian reinforcements led by Vologases to the North of the Araxes River. The battle was slow, but ultimately decisive as the Parthian king fled the scene when his forces succumbed to a flanking maneuver by the forces of Incitatus whom had joined the main force the previous day. The bulk of the Armenian army fled into the country and the legions marched with impunity to join the siege of Tigranocerta which was still ongoing under the command of Felix.

The legions thereafter quickly secured the surrender of the city once the defenders heard of the defeat of Tigranes and Vologases, and the city was spared the fates of Volandum and Artaxata. However, word quickly reached the legions, now in a combined force of nearly sixty-thousand, that the Parthians were massing a fuller counterattack in Mesopotamia from the South. The legions were quickly marched to Nisibis, the nearest major city in Mesopotamia, where they engaged several parties of scouts from the Parthian camp, but were otherwise unimpeded in their seizure of the city. They remained there for the rest of the year as a pestilence settled in their camp. Many legionaries accused the locals of treachery and many were butchered, justly or unjustly, as recompense for this loss. However, the gravest victim of this plague was Drusus Caesar himself. His constant activity in the castrum and his attendance to the sick and wounded soldiers under his command saw him fall ill, and within a month, he lay dead in his tent, attended by his son, his trusted freedman Fronto, and his friend and brother-in-law Silius. The legions mourned the death of their imperator, and they rallied in attendance to his reported last words, “Fear not, dear soldiers, for victory is still yours. The death of one man is no great loss for the Republic.” He was forty-two years old and had ruled the empire with his brother for five years.

His officers gathered together in a consilium to face the gravity of these events. Lollius, the highest ranked of them, assured the others that the transfer of sole power to the younger Caesar was a cause for joy rather than dread, for this tragedy need not plunge the Empire into war. The princeps was alive and well and his son was in good health and of capable administrative ability. However, Corbulo and Silius were wary of this assurance. Lollius had been arranged to marry the daughter of Marcus Rufus by Gaius Primus and thus enjoyed the favor of Caesar’s brother. They had no such favor, and indeed had been staunch proponents of the adoption of Servius into Caesar’s house because of their friendship with Galba. Now, Galba was in exile, the paterfamilias of the Claudii was dead, and Gaius Aviola had succumbed to his age. What remained in Rome of the faction of Drusus were the ex-consuls Mummius, Milo, and Paulinus, and these men were not of sufficient rank or status to lead them through the gauntlet of certain tribulations that Caesar was awaiting to foist upon them. Caesar’s hostility to the faction of his dead brother need no longer be concealed behind the facade of criminal trials that had been employed in the previous years. Corbulo, the bravest of these men, resolved to return to Rome alone, leaving Felix in his place to serve as the magister consilium, and beg for the clemency of Caesar, appealing his long history of service and statesmanship to be made to account for any hostilities at which the new Caesar might direct him. The officers thus resolved to administer an oath of loyalty to the new Caesar to their legions and continue the campaign unimpeded under the command of Lollius, and they prayed for good fortune and awaited news from Rome.
 
Last edited:
Well, for the young Cesar besides of the loyalty oath, I guess that the more important could be to get and keep the fidelity of the army, would be to show that he has inherited the martial and leadership skills from his father in the soon to be fought great and guess that decisive battle against the Parthians. Also, he will should achieve a great victory for Rome and for his own security.

Also, I think that would be possible that the overtaxed and persecuted romanized new provincial elites of the province of Africa that at least in the last update (before to this update) seemed probable that were possibly that a rebellion was about to happen, if their envoys complains failed to be listened in Rome by the Senate, while besides of a possible barbarian rebellion/incursion seemed, too, probably.

Finally, with Seneca the Old stripped of his senatorial rank and exiled what could be happening to his sons (and especially to Lucius Annaeus Seneca or 'Seneca the Younger' that's was the more remembered/famous, in OTL) social status and more important, career in TTL...
 
Well, for the young Cesar besides of the loyalty oath, I guess that the more important could be to get and keep the fidelity of the army, would be to show that he has inherited the martial and leadership skills from his father in the soon to be fought great and guess that decisive battle against the Parthians. Also, he will should achieve a great victory for Rome and for his own security.

Also, I think that would be possible that the overtaxed and persecuted romanized new provincial elites of the province of Africa that at least in the last update (before to this update) seemed probable that were possibly that a rebellion was about to happen, if their envoys complains failed to be listened in Rome by the Senate, while besides of a possible barbarian rebellion/incursion seemed, too, probably.

Finally, with Seneca the Old stripped of his senatorial rank and exiled what could be happening to his sons (and especially to Lucius Annaeus Seneca or 'Seneca the Younger' that's was the more remembered/famous, in OTL) social status and more important, career in TTL...

I won’t spoil anything, but just know that the next five or so years are going to be very very eventful, and loyalty is going to be a scarce commodity in Rome. ;)

The Africans were fairly satiated by the exile of Galba, who was the object of their aggravation. They also benefitted from the transfer of a legion from Spain, so they are currently enjoying increased protection from nomadic raiders. The main vulnerable frontier at this moment is the east, which is seeing the first major test of the defensive policy developed at the end of Germanicus’ reign. If the strategic rationale of Germanicus fails, the the government in Rome will have to make a major adjustment.

That actually was Seneca the younger who got exiled. I had to pick a name out of a hat and I figured I’d knock him out early. I’ve decided to give little shout outs to historical figures in unexpected ways (I.e. Vindex ironically being instrumental in the downfall of Galba) to differentiate from IOTL.
 
Welcome back and I hope to see soon some updated trees as keeping track of the Julio-Claudian clan is complicated

Don’t worry, I have one in the works that should clear up the confusion!

EDIT: It may take a little while cause it's nearly impossible to keep track of everyone considering there are like twelve women named "Julia", just to give an example, and I have to reconcile all the times I've contradicted myself ITTL (cause it's way more times than I thought haha). There's two more updates in this chapter which will cover the period up to the end of 56 CE, and I'll put the family tree in the next update from the "author"
 
Last edited:
Book 32: 53-54 CE
Book Thirty Two - Destabilization of the East and Rome

News of Drusus' death.jpg

News of Drusus' death reaches his wife Julia Augusta, whom is comforted in this news by Lepida Augusta, the wife of Vopiscus Caesar

—In the consulship of Antonius Vipsanius Agrippa Postumus for the Second Time and Decimus Junius Silanus…

The urban prefect Agrippa stepped into the consulship designated for Drusus before his untimely death and held a session of the senate to award posthumous honors upon the son of the Divine Invictus. However, there was business to which the senate must attend at that juncture. The consilium of the princeps, which had been gathering annually from all the colleges of magistrates, had nominated the candidates for consuls and censors for the next five years, however these nominations were made at the suggestion of Drusus, who now vacated sole power to his brother. However vengeful he may have felt towards the faction of his brother, Gaius counseled Caesar that he should not overturn the majority of these designations for fear of a revolt in the legions loyal to the memory of Drusus. Ergo, the elections for censors went unabated and, to his surprise, Corbulo was elected censor upon his entry to Rome. His colleague was Glabrio, with whom he had been close during the Italian campaign against Agrippa Postumus, and although he was a powerful man with considerable power in the senate, Corbulo heartily parlayed to his eastern colleagues that the graciousness of Caesar knew no prejudices. However, not all such men were accepting of such incautious formalities. Mummius and Milo, together with Suetonius Paulinus, left Rome to assume command of the legions in Illyricum, to which they had been nominated by Drusus, and Caesar did not learn of this until they had already made contact with the soldiers, who at that time were mourning their former patron, and thus he was disinclined to recall them.

Caesar saw fit, however, to recall his son, whom at that time was in Cilicia, such that he may remain close and protected from the might of Drusus’ faction in the provinces. Publicola entered Rome on the third day before the Kalends of Martius, and was ordered by his father to divorce his wife, Cornelia. In order to strengthen his dynastic potential in comparison with the young Servius, whom was still the heir to the principate at this time, Publicola was arranged to marry Agrippina, the recently widowed daughter of Gaius. Her husband, Asinius Saloninus, was compensated by a marriage to Vibia Sabina, the granddaughter of Julia the Younger and daughter of the ex-consul Laelius Balbus, whose husband Habitus had recently and unexpectedly died while in Germania commanding a legion. In addition to this, the senate passed a decree formally granting to Gaius the tribunician authority he had thus far been denied. Although he did not receive a grant of imperium, this elevation was of crucial importance, as it placed him as the direct heir to Caesar in Rome. Servius, although he did have proconsular imperium, was far from Rome, and Publicola had not even been granted the authority of a tribune at this juncture. This, combined with the urban praetorship of Tiberius the Elder in that year, placed Gaius at the center of the August family, connected as he was by marriage to the clans of the Sullae, the Claudii, Agrippa, and the Cassii, as well as the brother-in-law of the princeps himself.

On Publicola’s return to Rome, Caesar dismissed Hosidius Geta as praetorian prefect and replaced him with Antonius Saturninus, an equite whose family had enjoyed close relations with the Julii since the time of the Divine Invictus. Saturninus was a man of naked ambition and ruthless in his pursuits. Rumors report that when he was a tribune of the guard for the city of Volsinii, he had one of his superiors poisoned and then tortured and executed the slave whom administered the poison. His ire was unmatched and he was a close associate of Glabrio, as the grandfather of Glabrio, Salvius Aper, had been the prefect under whom Saturninus had been a young protege. This move alarmed the patroness of Geta, Julia Drusilla Augusta herself, the widow of Drusus. She had spent little time in the public eye during the reign of her husband, and on his death, she assumed the head of their household as Servius was too young and far away for such a burden. Her influence ran deep within the city of Rome, and she counted among her friends many of the noble houses of Rome, including those of the men commanding legions in the provinces. Caesar came to fear her influence, especially as she made open overtures for her son Servius to be recalled to Rome and imbibed with greater imperium as the eldest heir of Caesar. Gaius and his elder brother Caesar became wary of her and they made efforts to diminish her influence in the city.

In order to seize greater control of Rome, Caesar induced his uncle, Tiberius the Elder, whom was the urban praetor in that year, to introduce a law forbidding the inheritance of a man to pass to his wife if she remained unmarried upon his death after the appropriate mourning period. This was aimed directly at Augusta, whom had made it abundantly clear that she did not wish to remarry and preferred the company of her brother Felix and his entourage, with whom she had grown close in the aftermath of her father’s fall from power. Caesar was thusly able to defer the inheritance of Drusus from her to his brother Gaius, whom was the second heir. This alarmed many in Rome, as there appeared to be, either by fraud or by contempt of his father, no substantial inheritance for Servius, leaving some to believe that he intended to adopt one or both of Gaius’ sons on his return to Rome, as Servius’ biological father Galba, remained deeply unpopular in Rome and in the legions. This massive wealth was used by Gaius to pay a generous donative to the praetorians whom had accompanied Drusus to Syria, and this legacy’s arrival in Syria came with it new orders for the legions therein.

Caesar was fearful of Felix and his relationship to the family of Drusus, and he thusly resolved that the war in Parthia be forgone for the time being while he re-evaluated the capabilities of the incumbent command staff and saw to it that the war be prosecuted by his own allies. His father’s own seizure of power from Vipsanianus taught Caesar the value of commanding the eastern legions, and he did not wish for Felix, who enjoyed the companionship of many of the legates in Syria, to be realized with designs upon the Empire. The legions, whom had been encamped near Edessa and engaged in sporadic skirmishes with the recuperating Parthian army, begrudgingly accepted the order to retreat, and ironically it was Felix whom reminded them that they had sworn an oath to obey Caesar, in spite of many among their number wishing to see Felix or even young Servius usurp power from the hated brother of their beloved imperator. The Parthians rapidly capitalized on this, invading and seizing considerable wealth from Commagena and Sophene. The legions were thusly employed to exact further levies of troops and tribute from the desert oasis towns of Syria. The losses sustained by the legions to the plague in Parthia were considerable, and Caesar had thusly ordered the replenishment of their force in addition to ensuring the loyalty of the local Syrian provincials.

These transgressions incensed the fury of the Syrians, and they quickly rallied behind a man claiming descent from Tigranes Magnus and Mithridates VI named Alexander Eumenes who had levied an armed force from the towns of Heriopolis and Palmyra. He railed against the unjust subjections of the governor of Syria, whom at that time was Lentulus Scipio, the consul of seventeen years hence and an ally of Caesar from the time of Agrippa’s revolution and a close associate of Cato and Scribonianus, whom in that year were the urban prefect and the princeps senatus, respectively. The small militia of Eumenes had received additional help from the Parthians and the Arabs of Osrhoene, who supplied the cavalry for this desert army. The advantage of swiftness they enjoyed over their legionary pursuers was considerable, and thus, they avoided capture in this year and spent months raiding the settlements of the Euphrates with impunity, even reaching as far West as Nicopolis and Germanicia. In the vacuum that this created in Armenia, Tigranes was able to return to his capital and levy a second army from among the displaced peasants whom had seen their homes destroyed by the legions in addition to mercenaries sent by the kings of the Albanians and the Medians. The legions were thusly furious with their commanders, especially with Lollius, as he seemed to be provoked little by the indignities under which they had suffered. This was further exacerbated by the officers whom arrived in that year to replace their legati. Licinius Mucianus and Felix in particular had been in good standing with their soldiers, and their replacements, among whom were the former urban prefect Vettius Rufus and his brother-in-law Rubellius Blandus, neither of whom were well-respected in Rome or in the legions. However, the parting words of Felix served to quiet their nerves. On departing their castrum near the town of Sura, Felix bade the following farewell, “Comrades and countrymen, fear not these brief reverses, for no barbarians have withstood the cudgel of a steadfast legion.” As Felix returned to Rome, he was embraced by Caesar and given the corona civica by vote of the senate. However, he was not awarded with any further offices, and remained at Rome as a private citizen for the remainder of the year.

As the situation in Parthia deteriorated further, the partisans of Caesar were active in Rome. Tiberius had seen the passage of two laws through the senate. These, which would become known as the Vipsanian laws on the courts and the equites, saw the crucial transfer of all jury courts to the senate, robbing the equites of their position as jurors in all cases, whereas before the majority of the criminal quaestiones had seen their membership as half of the judges. However, the second of these laws, which was supposed to have been written by Tiberius himself, established a coherent series of offices in which equites might serve for any length of term and be awarded greater honors in parallel with those of senators on their cursus honorum. The equites, which would begin their careers as centurions or as commanders of auxiliary cohors, would see promotion through a variety of posts as legionary tribunes, provincial tax collectors, and if they reached such heights, prefects of the praetorian guard or of entire provinces. The senatorial and equestrian orders both heartily lauded Tiberius for what each saw as a diminution of the other and an elevation of their own. Tiberius himself had been an eques for many years before his reinstatement into the senate in the consulship of Drusus and Vopiscus Augustus for the third times, and thus he was beloved by their order as well as by the senate, as he was the brother of the Divine Invictus and one of the eldest among their number, in spite of serving numerous offices very late in his career.

The remainder of the senate was quiescent in this year, following the lead of the consuls, as the censors were wary of their own positions, especially Corbulo, whose family connections made him closely aligned with Tiberius Gemellus, another eques of the imperial family whose son, Gaius Nero, was engaged to Corbulo’s daughter. All applauded Tiberius and Agrippa for their legislative accomplishments and Caesar for his prudent temporary halt on the war in Armenia — although many senators silently resented this choice — and awaited Caesar’s next move, uncertain of the loyalties of any other their fellows in the developing new regime.

Senatorial purge victims.jpg

Many elder senators stand at the entrance to the Curia to vocally oppose the political trials undertaken in these years

—In the consulship of Publius Licinius Crassus Dives and Gaius Cornelius Cinna…
The vivacious Labienus assumed the office of praetor patriae and he assumed the reigns of the senate with haste. He arranged for the election of Tiberius the Elder to the urban prefecture, in spite that he had never served as consul. This special exemption was not commented on by Caesar, and Labienus took this as a signal that pursuits of his own agenda were permissible. The consuls for that year were both kinsmen of Labienus — Crassus was his cousin-in-law by their mutual marriages into the extended family of the Vipsanii and the Cassii, and Cinna was the son-in-law of his patron Sulla Felix — and he sought this as leverage towards his own ends. Caesar himself spent the bulk of the year in Campania, and by his absence, Labienus had seized effective control of the government. Only Gaius remained in the city with any authority to oppose his designs, and this did not appear likely given Gaius’ kinship with Agrippa, whom was himself a close friend of Labienus.

With control of the jury courts now under the full control of the senate, Labienus saw fit to deliver a series of speeches denouncing the flight of Milo from Rome as potential for treason against Caesar. He likewise bade foul omens for Felix in his apparent failure to prosecute the Armenian War fully in the absence of direct orders from Rome. He accused Felix of collusion with the Parthians to murder Drusus and seize his offices. Although many senators respected Felix, they were unable to vocally oppose Labienus for fear of provoking the wrath of Caesar himself. When he was summoned to the court of Labienus, he brought for his defense a number of elder statesmen on the stature of Otho, the consul of fifteen years hence, Blaesus the former censor, and Vitellius, the consul of five years hence, all of whom were well-respected men whom were friends of Drusus while he was alive. Labienus himself quickly became realized that he miscalculated the magnitude of support for Felix among the senators, many of whom owed their careers to his father, and he found himself unable to secure a conviction for such a well-liked man and great-grandson of the Divine Augustus. Labienus thereafter was humbled for his inability to secure such convictions and bore greater discretion for the remainder of the year. His brother-in-law Lucceius assumed the lead in the remainder of the prosecutions that year. For it was in this year that the law of treason saw itself abused to a remarkable extent as agents of Caesar sought to marginalize his political enemies and groveling sycophants informed on allegations in the same way such that they might gain favors or goodwill in the future.

Apronius Caesennius, the son of the disgraced princeps senatus whom had served as one of Agrippa’s lackeys during his attempt at usurpation, was the praetor of the bribery court in that year, in spite of his relatively advanced age for a lesser office, and he collaborated with Lucceius in that year in order to exact vengeance upon the men whom had ousted his father from his honorable service. Although they had played little direct part in Felix’s seizure of Rome from Agrippa, all three of the defenders of Felix were serving in the legions concurrently and Apronius and Lucceius seized upon this relationship to the part they played in securing Felix’s acquittal as the primary implicating factor in their own trial against these men for bribery. Lucceius argued before the senate that these men, whom were close associates of the disgraced and exiled Galba — with Blaesus even having served with him as consul — to undermine their own standings in the senate. Blaesus was completely unprepared for this sudden and rigorous attack on his dignity, especially coming from his stepson-in-law Apronius, whom was married to his step-daughter, Marcella Antonia. The three ex-consuls appealed to Caesar to impose his tribunician authority on what was evidently a fraudulent trial, but Caesar responded enigmatically, “Men who would wield their powers against the law are precisely those whom the courts exist to contain, for the law is the master of Rome, not I.” Blaesus was struck with fear when Caesar said this, and he fled into exile before the trial was complete. He was retroactively condemned for bribery, and his own flight helped secure the convictions of Otho and Vitellius as well. The sons of these men were married to the granddaughters of the deceased Marcus Rufus, and they were stripped of senatorial rank and likewise had their sons’ marriages annulled and their wives were remarried.

Corbulo watched all of this with apprehension. As a censor, he was not able to be subjected to these same indignities irrespective of the praetors’ designs upon him. However, to see his mentor Blaesus, under whom he had served at great length in Germania, and one of his close friends Otho, disgraced in such a way saw him realized with fear. He was the father-in-law of Gaius Nero, and his father Tiberius Gemellus had not been active in political life since his praetorship in the consulship of Silius and Plautius, and in spite of his lofty ancestry — his father was a censor and his grandfather was consul and now deified — he had not leveraged this in any apparent means to establish himself as a man of any influence, except for as a patron of the arts. He could likewise not rely on his colleague in the censorship or any of the consuls for the next several years, as they were largely allies and clients of Caesar, and he thus turned to the only two persons in Rome able to stand independently of Caesar: his brother Gaius and his widowed sister-in-law Julia. He firstly arranged for his daughter to divorce Nero and marry Marcus, the younger son of Gaius, and began meeting with Julia in private. Nero was compensated for this arrangement by being arranged to marry Otho’s divorced wife, Julia Paulina. She had retained her title of Augusta, and her close consular allies, Aemilius Scaurus and Furius Camillus, were also in good standing with Caesar — Caesar had even been the one to advocate for Scaurus’ consulship in the consilium that nominated such officeholders. Corbulo confided secretly with one of his few army comrades left in the senate, the princeps senatus, Scribonianus. Scribonianus had commanded an army of recruits from Italia with distinction during the Marcomannic war, and was honored with triumphal distinctions. However, the other legati and officers from that war — Drusus, Scapula, Otho, Gaius and Lucius Silanus, Sutorius Macro, Octavius Laenas, and many others — had each been killed or exiled in the many years of strife which had followed. In addition to the two of these men, only Milo and Silius remained in good standing with the regime, and even so their standing relied heavily on their own marriage ties to Caesar as well as their absence from Rome and clear self-subordination to their new master.

However, in that year, the war in the East bade further calamities for the enemies of Caesar. As Eumenes was fleeing to the North into Comagena, the legion of Gaius Caetronius was ordered by Lollius to lay down much of their equipment and pursue quickly the insurgents in flight. The cavalry of this force, led by Servius Caesar, found a group of encamped Syrians unprepared for an engagement in the outskirts of the town of Samosata, and he rapidly encircled them and captured several before they were able to form into a defensive formation. However, as the legionaries of Servius began to send for reinforcements by the legion of Caetronius, a multitude of Syrian cavalry and archers set upon them from an encamped position between two hills to the North of their small force. Servius immediately recognized this as a trap, but as he ordered his men to retreat, the superior numbers of the Syrians overwhelmed his minimal force, and they were slaughtered to a man. When Caetronius arrived, he is reported to have wept openly at the corpse of Servius, and immediately ordered an altar be built to him at the site of his death and offerings made to the Divine Invictus.

The news of Servius’ death was met with equal parts despair and fury by the legions. Vettius Rufus saw this opportunity not simply to gain favor for himself with the legions, but also capitalize on their inflamed passions. He produced a will that was alleged to be that of the now-dead Servius, which named the legions as his only heirs, and Vettius showered sesterces upon the legionaries and made promises of greater rewards once the marauding Syrians had been dealt with. Thus inspired, the legions marched on numerous desert towns and razed them to the ground, crucifying women and despoiling oases with impunity, knowing that the Syrians would not stand for such indignities. As the legions were marched towards the hometown of Hieropolis with the vocal aim of reducing the city in the same manner as they had done others, a number of free cities announced their defection from the cause of the revolutionaries. Chief among these was Palmyra, whom had never officially endorsed these mutineers, but now took the additional step of retroactively condemning and exiling any man whom had lent aid and comfort to Eumenes and his army. The Syrian army, quickly draining their own supplies and losing still greater support from the broader Syrian population, sought one last gamble in the support of the Parthians. Vologases refused to send any coherent force to aid Eumenes, and thus the Syrian “king” was forced into an attempt to defeat the legions in open battle. This predictably failed, and the few rebels who did not defect were crucified, and the revolt in Syria was over. Lollius, whom had overseen this entire operation announced great clemency to those whom had defected, but imposed harsh penalties on those whom had stood in array against his army. He seized many and sold them as slaves and extorted exorbitant portoriae against the merchants whom had been complicit in their treacheries. The Syrians did not repeat this transgression, and the army of the East was once again freed from domestic commitments. The Parthians were now in their focus once more, and the retributive instincts of the legions still unsatisfied. The war in Parthia was far from over.

However, Caesar at this moment took the chance to order his forces in Syria to reconsolidate their control over that region, collect taxes as they were traditionally levied, and construct new roads and aqueducts to reward the bulk of Syrians for their loyalty and compliant subordination. Caesar furthermore saw the transfer of numerous provinces to the control of the senate. All of Hispania and much of Gaul were now their purview, with Caesar retaining control only over Germania, Illyricum, Syria, Aegyptus, and the Alpine passes. This did not diminish the command authority of Caesar, as his father and brother had done much to secure the command apparatus of the legions as being wholly distinct from the governorship of the provinces, thus the senate was only retained with control of the African legions, although in practice even these were under the auspices of the Magister Occidens, whom was an officer elected by Caesar’s consilium. Thus ended the year with the senate relishing in their new authority as governors but simultaneously in terror of the ascendant men in Rome — Labienus, Lucceius, Agrippa, Tiberius the Elder, and of course Caesar himself. The commanders of the legions obeyed Caesar dutifully, although the men under their commands would grow increasingly dissatisfied in the forthcoming years. Corbulo and Augusta were patient and cautious with their own maneuvers, although the exile at the end of the year of Papinius Allenius, the consul of twelve years hence for an alleged conspiracy against Caesar saw even his own allies grow in their suspicions. Men as powerful as Sulla and Glabrio knew that their own positions were contingent on the maintenance of Caesar’s goodwill, and the growing power of the freedman Claudius Primus in Caesar’s regime bade foul omens for all whom the regime touched.
 
Book 33: 55-56 CE
Book Thirty Three - The Drusillan Reunification

images-4.jpeg
images.jpeg

Vopiscus Caesar's joint-heirs and co-consuls for the year, Publicola (left) and Gaius (right)
—In the consulship of Tiberius Julius Caesar Vopiscus Germanicus Publicola and Gaius Julius Caesar Germanicus Primus…
The freedman Claudius Primus induced Caesar to dismiss Fabius Corvus as the secretary of the treasury and appoint in his place Primus’ friend, Didius Aper. They knew, as Caesar did, that the public treasuries had descended into a state of disarray when the new senatorial provinces, now staffed by the personal entourages of the senators therein, attempted to reconfigure the financial statuses of their domains. The treasury of the empire thusfar had consisted of three principle sums of money. The first was the traditional public treasury which consisted of the incomes collected in the senatorial provinces in addition to the portoriae at the Empire’s borders. The second was the military treasury, established by Augustus, and filled by the indirect taxes on the manumission of slaves, the purchase of goods at auction, and the inheritances on Italian estates which was used exclusively to fund the Empire’s legions on the frontiers. The third of these was the personal discus of the princeps himself. This consisted of the vast largess of the personal estates of Caesar upon which rents were collected and produces sold at market. Included within this fiscus was the vast sum of wealth produced by Aegyptus, which had been organized to collect a variety of licenses, levies, and tributes from its peoples by the Greek kings whom had once reigned in that country. The public treasuries, which were at that time divided into discrete sums from each of the numerous provinces were brought into the auspices of the imperial household, from whence the quaestors would administer them in confluence with the triumvirs of finance and the treasury secretary. Each of these offices would themselves report to the urban prefect whom would assume this charge from the princeps. These six men, the would allow Caesar to monitor more closely the empire’s finances, as the various prefects and procurators of the numerous provinces would deposit a portion of their own state incomes into the military treasury at the end of their tenure in office.

Agrippa, whom was now serving as the prefect of Italy after his consulship, arranged for the elections of his kinsmen to still higher offices. Agrippa’s own nephews-in-law, Vipstanius and Apronius had been awarded numerous honors, and now served as the legati of the Italian legions. These prestigious postings ennobled their standing further, and Agrippa would wield considerable influence in the consilium for that year, arranging for the appointment of many of his kinsmen and allies to consulships in the coming years. Gaius likewise, as the closest advisor to Caesar, cautioned him against allowing Silius and Milo to remain in command of the legions along the Ister. However, their popularity with the senate and the legions made their execution and exile problematic, thus Caesar resolved these by appointing them to the governorships of Haspania and Narbo, from whence they would command no legions. This alarmed Felix, whom was a close friend of both men, and he took his family with him and departed for Syria, fearing that a reprisal from Caesar was imminent.

However, as Caesar’s new legati — two former praetors named Titus Tatianus and Pettius Cerealis — arrived at Sirmium and ordered them to exact levies on the local towns whom had been judged to have underpaid their taxes in the previous years, the legions refused. Many of them had been Illyrians by birth whose fathers had served in the auxilia, and these men would, by law, gain citizenship upon their discharge. These career soldiers of the second and third generations had participated in the wars against Dacia in the reign of the Divine Drusus, as well as the wars against the Thracians and Sarmatians in recent years, and many of them had defected to the cause of the Divine Invictus when they had been induced to rebellion by Naevius Surdinus. They considered themselves loyal legions, in spite of their origin among the provincials, and those from whom they were ordered to exact tribute were their families and compatriots. Cerealis was worked into such a fury that he ordered a cohort of the Legio I Germanica be decimated. This affront was too great for the prefect Marcus Umbrius, whom was a veteran officer of that legion, and he induced his men into a mutinous fervor, killing Cerealis and forcing Tatianus to flee the province. When he reached Rome and reported this to Caesar, he ordered his son Publicola to travel to the Ister and appeal to their love of country. The crisis remained unresolved for that year, as Publicola answered numerous petitions of the Macedonians and the Dalmatians on his route to Sirmium, which took considerable time and lengthened his journey by many months.

Meanwhile in the East, the Parthians had mustered their considerable strength in order to recover their losses in Armenia and Mesopotamia. Their armies ravaged the country of Commagena and its neighbors, and in response their king Alexander appealed to the Roman ambassador in their country, whom relayed this message to Lollius. Lollius, by this point, was engaged in a tour of Syrian towns in order to ensure their loyalty in the aftermath of Philopator’s revolt, and this news quickly filtered down to the contubernia of his legions. The centurions were wary of this discontent and they communicated their concerns with Lollius and his fellow officers. The commander sought to assuage these concerns, but re-emphasized the importance of their supply lines in Syria as a prerequisite to any war in Parthia, and reneged on his prior promises to return to the campaign in that year. The troops became restive, and as news of the indignities suffered by Roman citizens in Commagena and Cappadocia reached their ears, their furies at the exactions of the Parthians grew in magnitude. When word of the mutiny in Dalmatia reached their marching camp, the troops in Syria likewise raised up their arms in disobedience of their officers. A freedman of Lollius was undertaking an inventory of the legionaries’ equipment when he was set upon and lynched by the irreverent soldiers. Lollius and the rest of his advisors feared for their own safety, and they fled Syria under the cover of darkness rather than face the consequences which had befallen Caesar’s officers in Illyricum. On their departure, the legions hailed Felix as the new Augustus when he arrived in Syria with his family in the latter days of Sextilis.

When Caesar heard of these developments, he was spun into a murderous fervor. He had watched the departure of Felix with considerable suspicion, and had allowed it in spite of this, but he could not abide this attempt at the usurpation of his office. He at once arrested Cotta and several of his comrades and had them all executed. Their allies in the senate were cowed and sought merely to preserve their own lives. Caesar resolved that he would send a group of praetorian guardsmen with his cousin Tiberius Gemellus in order to regain the loyalty of the Syrian legions. In return, he was promised a consulship for himself and his son Nero in the forthcoming years. Lepidus, Caesar’s brother-in-law, sought at this juncture to demonstrate his loyalty to Caesar by amassing his considerable wealth and departing for Syria with Gemellus, and Gaius supported this motion heartily. They departed the city quickly at the end of September and would arrive early in the next year.

Corbulo fell ill at this time, and Glabrio seized upon his colleagues’ absence to expel numerous men from the senate and confiscate their estates on Caesar’s behalf. The ex-consuls Gaetulicus and Balbus Minor, whom were kinsmen of Felix fled Rome with their families to Macedonia, as did the ex-praetor Haterius Antoninus. The latter of these affronted Labienus, whom remained very active in the senate and urbis, as Antoninus was his cousin-in-law and had been his ally in the prosecutions which took place in his court in the consulship of Drusus and Vopiscus Augusti for the third times, and Labienus was vocal in his opposition. Labienus estimated that his familial and personal connections to Agrippa and Gaius would protect him from Caesar, but Glabrio did not hesitate is stripping him of his rank and banishing him from Rome after his praetorship expired at the end of Sextilis. While he expected support from the most powerful men in Rome, none of them interceded and without indications of their intentions, the multitude of the senate was perfectly satisfied in leaving Labienus to his fate. However, while in exile, Labienus sent a multitude of letters to Gaius and Agrippa, begging their intercession on his behalf, as he was filled with passion for the city of Rome and her political life. However, neither Gaius nor Agrippa felt compelled to openly denounce the actions of Caesar’s most powerful lieutenant in the senate. However in the latter months of the year, as Glabrio prepared to expel still more men from the senate, Corbulo strode into the Curia, still recovering from his illness, and openly challenged the actions of Glabrio. The Caecilian law on the censors stipulated that both censors must concur for any man to be formally censured, and this fact was confirmed by the Poppaean and Julian laws passed under the auspices of the Divine Augustus, and in Corbulo’s absence, no senator saw fit to challenge this. However, Camillus Scribonianus, the princeps senatus, announced that with Corbulo returning to the senate, any further censures would be illegal. He felt uncomfortable challenging Glabrio directly, and thus declined to advocate for the revival of all the censures passed up to that point, but for the time being, Glabrio’s efforts had been curbed.

On the Ides of November, Caesar was set upon by an armed assassin as he passed along the path from the Domus Tiberiana into the Forum. He was lightly injured, but a group of the praetorians were able to come to his aid and killed the primary assailant, arresting the others. Under torture, the would-be assassin confessed that he had been paid by the freedman Paullus Fronto, whom had recently been forced in disgrace to retire. Caesar accordingly had him arrested and executed publicly and delivered a chilling speech on the floor of the senate, the text of which has been lost, but which the contemporary historian and later consul, Vibius Fronto commented that this oration, “Delivered adequately upon the collective fears of all innocent men in that emasculated chamber.” In the aftermath of this unadulterated threat, Gaius and Glabrio came forward, without the urging of Caesar and offered to hear any senatorial petition before Caesar, as it was widely known that Caesar had grown tired of the senate in recent months and saw more urgently the need to satiate the army, and had thus neglected to attend his consilium, instead spending the bulk of his days with his close advisors in the palace. When Gaius took this action, Caesar became even more cautious, and he did not wish for his young brother to control his awareness of the developing situation in the senate. However, he had long come to trust Gaius, as they had been close since their childhoods, and in the rest of that year, Caesar never left the Palatine Hill.​

Consul-leaves-Rome.jpg

The elderly Paullus Lepidus leaves Rome, accompanied by his own personal guard

—In the consulship of Lucius Gellius Publicola Vinicianus and Sextus Marius…
The flood of senatorial petitions to Caesar was stymied as a result of the intercession of Glabrio, and the princeps met this trend with fury and alarm. Caesar returned once more before the assembled senate and announced that no senator would be allowed to stand between him and any petitioner, and furthermore that Glabrio was to be stripped of his censorship. In spite of Glabrio’s protests, the consuls arranged for a special election to select his replacement and elected their most senior member, who although he had not yet served as consul, was granted a special exemption by the consuls — Tiberius the Elder, whom had likewise received a similar exemption on assuming the urban prefecture. Glabrio was harangued by the senior tribune and praetor-elect, Marcius Censorinus and hauled before the majestas court — which at that juncture was serving as the interim court for all treasonable offenses since the exile of Labienus had vacated the chief praetorship. The praetor, a provincial man named Julius Frontinius was not well disposed to the haughty Italian stock of Glabrio, and delivered a scathing indictment before the assembled senate. This trial was unusual in that Caesar himself was in attendance, although he fervently denied the depraved bargaining of Glabrio on his behalf and contented himself as merely a witness to the proceedings. Glabrio was found guilty by the senate, whom were sufficiently cowed by the presence of Caesar to fear opposing his evident wishes. Glabrio was thusly convicted, stripped of his rank, and condemned to death for treason. The suddenness of his downfall left many of Caesar’s erstwhile allies cautious for their own safety, as Glabrio had been one of Caesar’s most vocal advocates. Even allies of Caesar’s family, such as Fabius Persicus, Sulla Felix, and Cato were apprehensive at these developments, for the fall of Glabrio heralded a new chapter of Caesar’s relationship with the senate wherein even his staunchest allies were wary of his capricious retributions.

The legions in the provinces were induced into open fury on all quarters. On Publicola’s arrival in Sirmium, the mutinous legions embraced him. He was brought before the combined forces of infantry and auxiliae and was vaulted upon the shields of the aquiliferes and hailed as Augustus. He protested mightily at this, attempting to administer an oath of loyalty to his father to the rapturous legions, but it was to no avail. The surviving officers of those legions assured Publicola that there would be no other way to end the mutiny than for him to accept their acclamations. He reluctantly accepted and sullenly began to consider his options for further action. Likewise in Syria, as Lepidus and Gemellus arrived in Syria they were well-received by the legions, whom had already been host of Felix and his family, although Felix refused to administer a loyalty oath for himself. As Gemellus consulted with Felix, Lepidus presented his massive fortune before the soldiers and delivered a speech denouncing Caesar and suggesting his younger brother Gaius would be more fit to rule Rome and her Empire as the true heir to the memory of Drusus. Gemellus, upon hearing this, was alarmed and feared for his own life, as it was widely known that he had come to Syria as an agent of Caesar. He was induced to concede this to the legions and did not oppose them when their officers administered an oath of loyalty to Felix and Gaius as brothers in arms and co-rulers. Lepidus busied about readying the legions for an expedition, although it remained to be seen what their destinations and ends would be.

It was not long before Caesar became learned of the treacheries by his own son, although news from the East would take considerably more time to become known. His court was induced to a panic as they knew of the popularity of Publicola with the legions. They at once set about the systematic destruction of any man of influence whom may serve as a potential agent of the young potentate at Rome. Many ex-consuls were tried and exiled, with several being executed. These included Flavius Sabinus, the consul of sixteen years hence, Nonius Asprenas, the consul of fifteen years hence, and Messalla Corvinus, the consul of fourteen years hence. The sons of these men likewise fled into exile, and the number of the senate was reduced by half as the wary nobiles sought the preservation of their own safety in the Italian countryside and abroad. The most violent and unjust death at this time was that of the freedman Julius Carbo. He had lawfully served the father of Caesar as well as his brother, and upon the new Caesar’s assumption of sole rulership, he had likewise loyally served him as an administrator of justice and a consultant with Caesar’s consilium. However, all of these did not endow Caesar with any clemency, and his praenomen, Drusus, was sufficient to condemn him to death at the Tarpeian Rock. As these men were tried, and many of their slaves and freedmen tortured, the name of the prefect Vedius Pollio was given as one of the covert insubordinate agents of Publicola. In the dead of night as he slept, unaware of what ill fortunes had befallen him, he was butchered by the praetorian guardsmen whom he had so recently called his own. In his place, Gaius suggested Cornelius Atticus, a man well-known for his contempt of the senatorial order and whom had been a childhood friend of both Caesar and Gaius.

In his first act as prefect of the guard, Atticus brought charges upon the princeps senatus himself, Camillus Scribonianus. Camillus was an honest man well-renowned for his personal vigor and steadfastness of loyalty. During the rebellion of Surdinus, it was well known that he had personally been invited to join with Surdinus in the consulship they might share after deposing and killing the Divine Invictus, but he refused publicly, even offering his own son as a sacrifice for the Divine Invictus to test his loyalty. The senate was incensed. The leading prosecutor at that time was Marcus Lucceius, whom was also the consul-elect. He and his colleague, Vindex brought charges of corruption, treason, and bribery against Camillus for his conduct during the consular elections in that year. It was widely known prior to these elections that Lucceius and Vindex would be candidates, and their opponent was the young Gaius Cassius, whom was only twenty at that time. In the first assemblage of the electors, the senate overwhelmingly voted for Cassius to serve as consul, with some even suggesting that he begin the year as sole consul. However, Corbulo at that time dissolved the assembly and summoned them several days later once another quorum could be reached for the elections. Lucceius and Vindex were elected, and they subsequently accused Camillus of having bribed the numerous junior senators to support Cassius’ candidacy. This accusation was intractable as it had been levied against a man of such stature and for Lucceius to concede would be too great a submission to bear the weight of his failure, thus he prosecuted Camillus with furious vigor and vile rapacity. However, as many of the senate knew his innocence, they were unmoved by Lucceius’ impassioned addresses, and intended to acquit Camillus. It was not to be. On the day of the judgement, a century of the praetorian guard under the personal command of Atticus stood guard in the curia, and no senator was willing to expose himself as being of sympathy to the accused. As the judgement was delivered by Julius Frontinius, Camillus stood from his seat, pulled his toga over his head, and without speaking, walked out of the Curia. He was at once cut down by the praetorians, and in his feeble age, he did not see fit to combat this injustice. He would be the martyr for all of Rome to laud.

On the delivery of this news to the extended imperial family, the news of Gaius’ elevation by the Syrian legions became known in the city. Julia Augusta and Lepida Augusta, Caesar’s own wife, made known that they supported the accession of Gaius to the principate. The consuls were swift in their likewise acknowledgement, as were the censors. Only the elder prefect of the guard, Antonius Saturninus, was steadfast in his loyalty to Caesar. When he became learned of these developments, Caesar was furious. He at once ordered the death of his brother, but when the tribune whom had received this order reported it to the prefect Atticus, he refused to carry it out, and even swore fealty to Gaius himself. However, even as the praetorian cohorts abandoned their posts and congregated near the house of Gaius to protect him, Caesar and Saturninus fled the city. They were secure in the knowledge that a force of four legions awaited them in Italia that would make short work of whatever minimal efforts the praetorian guard might undertake within the city of Rome. However, when they reached Corfinium, where Agrippa and one of his legions were stationed at that time, they were refused entrance. The tesserarius whom refused them bade the following message, “The soldiers are awaiting orders from their imperator, Gaius Caesar Divi Filius, and by order of the prefect and consul Antonius Agrippa, will stand by until his own arrival.”

Saturninus and Caesar, accompanied by only a small retinue of minor magistrates and vigiles, were aghast when the cavalry of Gaius was reported to have been spotted in the distance. Caesar, that he might not be disgraced by his own younger brother, spat on the ground and with his dying breath, bore this curse upon his own lineage, “May the house of Caesar be consumed by the pit of snakes it has brought forth upon Rome.” He fell upon his sword, and Saturninus was quick to follow. Vopiscus Caesar was forty-five years old and had ruled the Empire first with his brother for five years and then in his own right for four years.

Gaius Caesar was thusly shepherded out of his home by the praetorians and on his entry to the Curia, he was granted the formal powers of maius imperium, consular imperium in Italia, and proconsular imperium in the provinces of his brother. The consuls, in an act of deference, resigned their offices as having wrought the dishonor of Caesar’s death during their tenure. In their place, two of their colleagues in the Decemvirate were nominated by the new Caesar, Tarius Gratianus and Domitius Afer, whom were both well-liked and well-respected. With many senators at that time returning to Rome, Caesar declared a general pardon, as the many expulsions and trials undertaken by Vopiscus in the latter part of his reign had been conducted without a legal quorum of senators — as many of their number had fled in fear — and the Julian laws of the Divine Augustus stipulated that a quorum need be reached before the passage of any consulta, which by the time of the Julian laws of the Divine Drusus, applied to jury trials as well. This furthermore meant that the consular elections of Lucceius and Vindex were invalid, and the new consuls summoned the senate for another election — the fourth consular election to take place in that year. The consuls elected were Caesar himself as well as Tiberius the Elder. In the following year, he would serve a concurring term as consul, suffect censor, and urban prefect, giving him unprecedented powers for a man not personally claiming the imperial dignity. Marius and Gellius Publicola, for their deference and patriotism, were dispatched to Syria to recall Lepidus and Felix to Rome and take command of the Syrian army to prosecute the unfinished war with the Parthians. There was much work to be done, and the new Caesar did not see fit to remain idle even in times of uncertainty.
 
Last edited:
Well, after this bloody zenith of Vopiscus' region at least not permanent harm nor any, that couldn't be undone, nor any disruption was done for the Empire or in its administration, both by the late emperor as well fortunately (for the new Emperor and Rome) was avoided a civil war. However, seems that for the new emperor and his legates and his counselors the next months or even years could be very busy.
 
Well, after this bloody zenith of Vopiscus' region at least not permanent harm nor any, that couldn't be undone, nor any disruption was done for the Empire or in its administration, both by the late emperor as well fortunately (for the new Emperor and Rome) was avoided a civil war. However, seems that for the new emperor and his legates and his counselors the next months or even years could be very busy.

Well, to those keeping track, three men were hailed as emperor in the last update - Gaius, Publicola, and Felix - and Gaius was simply the closest one to Rome. However, the Danube and Syrian legions may have different ideas, and the new emperor will certainly have to play his hand well in order to stay in power. In the coming years, Gaius will be faced with the consequences of his father's huge network of allies coming to blows with one another and emerge with a coherent faction of his own.
 
Volume Eight -- The House of Drusus
Volume Eight - The House of Drusus
Translated by Porcius Valentinianus Caecina MDXLVIII for the Theodoricine memorial library in Alexandria

As I'm sure you all have heard, the man who began this great project of translating the Annals, Clodius Theodoricus Alexander, has recently passed away amid his work on the translation of volume eight of this work. I have had the pleasure of studying under Alexander for nearly a decade since we met at a conference in Byzantium several years ago, and I have been one of his collaborators on this project for several years. I will do my utmost to maintain the integrity of the annals, as did he, while I continue to make them available for a wider audience. The new memorial library in Alexandria will not only house the most comprehensive collection of ancient works in the world from Rome, Greece, Aegyptus, and Mesopotamia, but also the transcripts of the capitoline fasti, the imperial archives, the acts of the senate, and the massive corpus of the institutes, and I am proud to have been asked to complete the seminal work of translating the Aelian Annals. One of the major flaws that modern scholars have found within the Annals are the frequency with which the author attempts to untangle the genealogical mess of the Julian family, often to frustrating avail. To rectify this end, I have compiled a comprehensive family tree of the Julians to date. For the convenience of the reader, I have annotated the various decorations on the very numerous descendants of Augustus.

G. Julius Caesar (praetor) (140 BCE—85 BCE) = Aurelia
—>
G. Julius Caesar (dictator) (a.k.a. Divus Julius) (100 BCE—44 BCE)= Cornelia/Pompeia/Calpurnia
Julia Prima (before 101 BCE—???) = Q. Pedius/L. Pinarius
Julia Secunda (101 BCE—51 BCE) = M. Atius Balbus
—>
Atia Balba Caesonia = G. Octavius Thurinus
—>
Octavia (69 BCE—11 BCE) = M. Claudius Marcellus/M. Antonius (triumvir)
Imp. Caesar Divi. f. Augustus (63 BCE—4 CE) = Scribonia/Livia Augusta
—>
Julia The Elder (39 BCE—8 CE) = Marcellus/Agrippa/Tiberius Nero/Jullus Antonius/Marcellus Aeserninus/Piso Caesoninus
—>
The Julian family is divided into five branches - each one descended from a different one of Julia and Agrippa's children. They are displayed in the following order: male-line Julians, Julian collaterals, minor Julians and major Claudians, Drusillans (children of Agrippina and Germanicus), and the extended Vipsanio-Cassii family.

Imp. G. Julius Divi. f. Divi. n. Caesar Augustus (Vipsanianus) (20 BCE-38 CE) = Julia Livilla (d. of Drusus Augustus)
  1. L. Julius G. f. Divi. n. Caesar Felix Pius (11-61 CE) = Claudia Gemella Maior (d. of Nero the censor)
    1. L. Julius L. f. G. n. Caesar Pius (32-61 CE) = Pomponia (d. of Milo, cos. 51 CE)
      1. Oct. Julius L. f. L. n. Caesar Pius (53 CE-)
  2. Julia Augusta = Drusus Germanicus (for their children, see [1])
  3. M. Julius G. f. Divi. n. Caesar Rufus (15-41 CE) = Licinia Divilla (d. of Crassus Dives, cos. 29 CE)
    1. Julia Livilla (27 CE-) = Cossus Cornelius Lentulus Gaetulicus (cos. 47 CE)
      1. Cornelia Gaetulicia (46 CE-) = G. Sentius Saturninus (s. of cos. 33 CE)
    2. Julia Rufinia (28 CE-) = G. Lollius (cos. 47 CE)
      1. Lollia (46 CE-) = A. Vitellius (s. of cos. 49 CE)
      2. Julia Paulina Rufina (48 CE-) = M. Salvius Otho (s. of cos. suff. 39 CE)

Julia the Younger (19 BCE-18 CE) = L. Aemilius Paullus (cos. 1 CE)/D. Laelius Balbus (cos. 6 BCE)
  1. Aemilia Lepida Augusta (5 BCE-) = Vopiscus Augustus (for their children, see [2])
  2. L. Aemilius L. f. Paulli. n. Paullus Lepidus (6-67 CE) = Drusilla (d. of Gaius Augustus II)
  3. D. Laelius D. f. M. n. Balbus (14-61 CE) = Julia Domitia (d. of Tiberius the cens.)/Vibia Postumia (d. of Vibius Lamia, pr. 37 CE)
    1. D. Laelius D. f. D. n. Domitianus (38 CE-) = Cornelia Marcia (d. of Sulla, cos. suff. 26 CE)
      1. Laelia Balbina (55 CE-)
      2. D. Laelius D. f. D. n. Geminus (56 CE-)
    2. Laelia Balba (41 CE-) = D. Haterius Antoninus (s. of Haterius Agrippa, cos. 43 CE)
    3. Vibia Sabinia (45 CE-) = A. Vibius Habitus (gs. of cos. suff. 10 CE)/Asinius Saloninus (gs. of cos. 8 BCE)

L. Julius Divi. f. Divi. n. Caesar (Vipsanianus) (17 BCE-38 CE) = Aurelia Cotta (d. of cos. 20 & 23 CE)
  1. Julia Aurelia (9 CE-) = Ti. Claudius Nero Gemellus (d. of Nero the censor)
    1. G. Claudius Ti. f. Dr. n. Nero (41 CE-) = Domitia Longina (d. of Corbulo)/Julia Paulina
    2. Claudia Gemella Minor (44-62 CE) = F. Julius Caesar (s. of Gaius Augustus II)
  2. G. Julius L. f. Divi. n. Caesar Solus (17-38 CE) = Julia Livilla (d. of Germanicus) (for their children, see [3])

Agrippina the Elder (14 BCE-46 CE) = Imp. Ger. Julius Divi. f. Divi. n. Caesar Augustus Invictus
  1. Imp. Dr. Julius Divi. f. Divi. n. Caesar Augustus Germanicus = Julia Augusta [1]
    1. Ner. Julius Dr. f. Divi. n. Caesar (31-44 CE) = Julia Prima (d. of Gaius Augustus II)
    2. Julia Drusilla (33 CE-) = Ser. Sulpicius Galba (later Ser. Julius Caesar)/Paullus Aemilius Scaurus (cos. suff. 48 CE)
      1. Aemilia Drusilla (54 CE-)
    3. Agrippina (34 CE-) = M. Furius Camillus (s. of cos. 31 CE and pr. sen.)
      1. M. Furius M. f. L. n. Camillus Agrippa (51 CE-)
      2. Furia (53 CE-)
    4. Ser. Julius Dr. f. Divi. n. Caesar Sulpicianus (27-54 CE) (adopted)
  2. Imp. Ti. Julius Divi. f. Divi. n. Caesar Vopiscus Germanicus Augustus = Lepida Augusta [2]
    1. Ti. Julius G. f. Divi. n. Caesar Vopiscus Germanicus Publicola (33 CE-) (adopted by Gaius Augustus II) = Junia Torquata (gd. of cens.)/Agrippina Prima
      1. Ti. Julius Ti. f. G. n. Caesar Vopiscus Germanicus Publicola Silanus (54 CE-)
  3. Imp. G. Julius Divi. f. Divi. n. Caesar Germanicus Primus Augustus = Cornelia Faustina (d. of cos. 26 CE)
    1. F. Julius G. f. Divi. n. Caesar (39-60 CE) = Claudia Gemella Minor/Pompeia Junilla
    2. Julia Prima (41 CE-) = Ner. Julius Caesar/Ant. Vipsanius Agrippa Maximus
    3. M. Julius G. f. Divi. n. Caesar (42 CE-) = Cornelia Dolabellina/Domitia Longina/Pompeia Junilla
    4. Cornelia Faustina (44 CE-) = P. Claudius Pulcher
    5. Agrippina Prima (45 CE-) = L. Claudius Marcellus (cos. 39 CE)/Ti. Julius Caesar Publicola
    6. Drusilla Prima (48 CE-) = L. Aemilius Paullus Lepidus
  4. Agrippina the Younger (15-63 CE) = D. Valerius Asiaticus (cos. 32 CE)/G. Sallustius Passienus Crispus (cos. suff. 29 CE)/M. Porcius Cato (cos. 36 CE)
    1. Porcia (33 CE-) = Paullus Fabius Persicus (cos. 37 CE)
      1. Fabia Maximina (50 CE-)
      2. Paullus Fabius Paulli f. Paulli. n. Macedonicus Maximus (53 CE-)
  5. Livilla (18 CE-) = G. Julius Caesar Solus/P. Cornelius Scipio (cos. 49 CE)/Gn. Domitius Ahenobarbus (cos. suff. 29 CE)/Gn. Pompeius (cos. suff. 59 CE)
    1. Julia Livilla (37 CE-) = P. Quinctilius Varus (cos. suff. 34 CE) [3]
    2. Cornelia Germanica (40 CE-) = Q. Cassius Longinus (s. of Cassius cens.)
    3. P. Cornelius P. f. P. n. Scipio (41 CE-)
    4. L. Domitius Gn. f. L. n. Ahenobarbus (44 CE-) = Poppaea Sabina
    5. Pompeia Junilla (49 CE-) = F. Julius Caesar/M. Julius Caesar
    6. Gn. Pompeius Gn. f. Sex. n. Magnus (51 CE-)
  6. Sex. Julius Divi. f. Divi. n. Caesar Germanicus (19-34 CE) (no issue)
  7. Drusilla (21 CE-) = G. Galerius Macedonicus (cos. 20 & 35 CE)/G. Silius (cos. 46 CE)
    1. G. Silius G. f. G. n. (46 CE-)
    2. P. Silius G. f. G. n. (47 CE-)
  8. M. Julius Divi. f. Divi. n. Caesar Germanicus (22-43 CE) = Calpurnia (d. of cens.) (no issue)

M. Vipsanius M. f. L. n. Agrippa Postumus (12 BCE-38 CE) = Plautia Silvia/Antonia (d. of Tiberius)
  1. M. Vipsanius M. f. M. n. Agrippa Postumus Aquileanus (10-38 CE) = Cocceia Nervilla (d. of cens.) (for their children, who were adopted by Aquileanus' brother, see below [4])
  2. Vipsania Postumia (11-60 CE) = G. Cassius Longinus (cos. suff. 27 CE and cens.)
    1. Cassia Longina = L. Antonius (cos. suff. 28 CE)/Q. Junius Blaesus (cos. suff. 29 CE)/L. Vipstanius (s. of cos. 19 CE)
      1. M. Antonius L. f. Julii. n. Primus (45 CE-)
      2. Marcella Antonia (45 CE-)
      3. Junia Popilia (48 CE-)
      4. L. Vipstanius L. f. M. n Junius Blaesus (51 CE-)
    2. G. Cassius G. f. G. n. Longinus (33 CE-) = Cornelia Gaetulicia (sis. of cos. 47 CE)
    3. L. Cassius G. f. G. n. Longinus (38 CE-) = Licinia Divilla (w. of M. Rufus)
    4. Q. Cassius G. f. G. n. Longinus (41 CE-) = Cornelia Germanica (d. of Scipio, cos. 49 CE)
  3. Ant. Vipsanius M. f. M. n. Agrippa Postumus = Pompeia (d. of cens.)/Claudia Gemella Maior (d. of Nero the cens.)
    1. Ant. Vipsanius Ant. f. M. n. Agrippa Maximus (39 CE-) = Julia Prima (d. of Gaius Augustus II)
    2. Vipsania Antonia (40 CE-) = Q. Labienus (cos. suff. 58 CE)
    3. M. Vipsanius Ant. f. M. n. Aquila Postumus (adopted) (29-58 CE) = Junia Torquata

Chronicle of Volume Eight (810 - 819 AUC)
Coming whenever I write it... I'm a little behind on the summaries
 
Last edited:
Top