The Anglo-Saxon Social Model

So there's genuinely no party for people with reactionary leanings? Yeah I don't really buy that. Unless that's the liberals, that would make sense considering Thatcher.

Yes, if you're a reactionary you're probably somewhere in the Liberals.

What about Australia, Canada and New Zealand?

Canada has French and New Zealand has...Maori, I guess.

Make your own jokes about how mutually intelligible Australian-English and British-English are. :winkytongue:

In Canada they learn French in the eastern part. The western part is interesting and will be gotten to in a future update (long story short - the Northwest Territories, Yukon and the prairie provinces dropped any 'native' languages as a show of difference from the eastern provinces. Nunavut (given province status in 1983) has Inuktitut. British Columbia adopts the local First Nations language as their 'native language' even for non-First Nations children (these languages are not widely spoken casually in non-First Nations families, though).

New Zealand has Maori, as you've suggested. A bit like in BC, study of it is mandatory for even non-Maori citizens. Unlike BC, however, Maori has staged a significant comeback and is spoken relatively widely across the island (although English is still the dominant language).

Australia doesn't really have a 'native' language; I'm afraid I'd forgotten about them. Schools in strongly Aborigingal areas which will teach the local language but attempts to spread that to non-Aboriginal areas have never really gone anywhere.
 
In Canada they learn French in the eastern part. The western part is interesting and will be gotten to in a future update (long story short - the Northwest Territories, Yukon and the prairie provinces dropped any 'native' languages as a show of difference from the eastern provinces. Nunavut (given province status in 1983) has Inuktitut. British Columbia adopts the local First Nations language as their 'native language' even for non-First Nations children (these languages are not widely spoken casually in non-First Nations families, though).
There are more than 30 First Nations languages spoken in OTL British Columbia. Which one are they using? If all of them, what happens if a child has to move from one school to another; do they have to switch learning languages?

New Zealand has Maori, as you've suggested. A bit like in BC, study of it is mandatory for even non-Maori citizens. Unlike BC, however, Maori has staged a significant comeback and is spoken relatively widely across the island (although English is still the dominant language).

Australia doesn't really have a 'native' language; I'm afraid I'd forgotten about them. Schools in strongly Aborigingal areas which will teach the local language but attempts to spread that to non-Aboriginal areas have never really gone anywhere.
As a New Zealander I find this a bit implausible. Even today there's no real support for making Maori mandatory for everyone - for one thing, there just aren't enough teachers, and even most Maori don't speak the language. I'd have to imagine a lot of the Maori teachers only have very rudimentary language skills.

There are over a thousand Aboriginal languages, so it'd be pretty difficult to preserve all of them in any case.
 
I could see there being native language instruction in areas with a high(er) native population, such as reservations, the Northwest Territory, etc.

I could also see people interested in learning native languages in university. But I agree with @Teiresias - the proportion of native people who even speak the language might be a problem.

Is there, for example, a Maori cultural revival movement, which encourages the learning of the native language?
 
I could see there being native language instruction in areas with a high(er) native population, such as reservations, the Northwest Territory, etc.

I could also see people interested in learning native languages in university. But I agree with @Teiresias - the proportion of native people who even speak the language might be a problem.

Is there, for example, a Maori cultural revival movement, which encourages the learning of the native language?
Not to mention that most non-native people probably won't be interested in learning the language - to give a comparison, how many English people, for example, learn Welsh or Irish? Also, how does it work with immigration? Are Pakistani immigrants to New Zealand required to learn Maori, for example?
 
Not to mention that most non-native people probably won't be interested in learning the language - to give a comparison, how many English people, for example, learn Welsh or Irish?

There are probably programmes to encourage people to learn the local native language, especially if you are going to be working for the public sector or in some kind of capacity where interacting with people who prefer to speak the native language is likely (say charity).

For instance, in my part of Wales*, knowing Welsh is basically mandatory if you want to work for the local authority.

At the very least, schools in Wales and Ireland will have the native language as a mandatory subject, even if they don't teach most lessons in that language.



*Which has a high percentage of Welsh speakers.
 
There are more than 30 First Nations languages spoken in OTL British Columbia. Which one are they using? If all of them, what happens if a child has to move from one school to another; do they have to switch learning languages?

The relevant local authority decides which 'native' language they'll use, which can lead to a somewhat broken up language education if children are often moving in between local authorities.

As a New Zealander I find this a bit implausible. Even today there's no real support for making Maori mandatory for everyone - for one thing, there just aren't enough teachers, and even most Maori don't speak the language. I'd have to imagine a lot of the Maori teachers only have very rudimentary language skills.

Is there, for example, a Maori cultural revival movement, which encourages the learning of the native language?

Basically what I did was advance the Maori Renaissance by several decades, with the main POD being that a Maori Battalion is formed and serves with distinction in the Second Boer War of the 1890s, becoming the nucleus of the revival. By the 1990s, the Maori Battalions still exist and have roughly the same public profile as the OTL Gurkhas. The case for Maori cultural revival is also helped by the fact that the Pacific Islands are also a full Commonwealth member state (although, obviously, I know that Maoris and Pacific Islanders aren't 'the same').

In my defence, I would say that I shouldn't over-emphasise the extent to which "everyone" in NZ speaks some Maori. I had imagined it being a bit like the Welsh language in Wales: pockets of it being spoken very intensely (i.e. areas where there are more ethnic Maoris), road signs are bilingual, you're strongly encouraged to have at least some if you want to work in the public sector and maybe 20% of the total population is able to speak it conversationally with everyone else (well, the non-Maori everyone else) thinking of it as that odd thing they learned at school.

I could see there being native language instruction in areas with a high(er) native population, such as reservations, the Northwest Territory, etc.

I could also see people interested in learning native languages in university. But I agree with @Teiresias - the proportion of native people who even speak the language might be a problem.

I had imagined that the Northern Territory had been given statehood (as 'Kingsland' or just 'North Australia') in 1911, in which case I think its senators, MPs and general culture would become key to the promotion Aboriginal culture in general. So there is an Aboriginal language/cultural revival but it's not been as successful as the Maori one for a number of reasons, not least the sheer number and diversity of Aboriginal cultures and languages.
 
Not to mention that most non-native people probably won't be interested in learning the language - to give a comparison, how many English people, for example, learn Welsh or Irish? Also, how does it work with immigration?

Not many English people learn Welsh or Irish but more Welsh and Irish people do, which is what I was going for.

Are Pakistani immigrants to New Zealand required to learn Maori, for example?

Yes. In the case of a Pakistani migrant family in New Zealand, there are also Commonwealth extra-curricular programmes to help the children keep up to date with their Urdu/Punjabi.
 
Not many English people learn Welsh or Irish but more Welsh and Irish people do, which is what I was going for.
The thing is, most New Zealanders would see the Maori language in the same way as an English person might see Welsh or Irish - both are languages native to the British Isles, but neither are part of an English person's identity or heritage, which is why so few English people bother learning them. Having Maori be compulsory for all New Zealanders would be like making Welsh compulsory for all English people. It's possible for it to become more prominent earlier, but it's very unlikely that everyone would learn it, especially with English being the Commonwealth language (I think you'd have similar problems with native languages of Australia or Canada - for most people it's not part of their identity, so why should they bother? Learning a language takes a lot of time).
 
Last edited:
The thing is, most New Zealanders would see the Maori language in the same way as an English person might see Welsh or Irish - both are languages native to the British Isles, but neither are part of an English person's identity or heritage, which is why so few English people bother learning them. Having Maori be compulsory for all New Zealanders would be like making Welsh compulsory for all English people.

Nah, it would be like making Welsh compulsory for English people living in Wales.
 
Nah, it would be like making Welsh compulsory for English people living in Wales.

Except in this case there are more English people in Wales than Welsh people (that is, there are more non-Maori than Maori in New Zealand).

These are all good points and I don't particularly disagree with you, at least in the sense of if you tried to do it today. I'd fall back on the points I made earlier, about TTL's New Zealand having an earlier Maori Renaissance movement, leading to an increase in pride for the nation's Maori heritage and traditions, including amongst non-Maori New Zealanders. I'd also say that I had imagined that the Maori and Pacific Islander population is about 5% higher than OTL owing to earlier introduction of better health policies, which will also help. As a final fallback I'm going to play my trump card that in my introduction I did say that inevitably more and more aspects of this TL would be tinged with wish-fulfilment as it progresses.
 
Except in this case there are more English people in Wales than Welsh people (that is, there are more non-Maori than Maori in New Zealand).
Have I missed a detail about 20th century Welsh history in this timeline where there are more English people than Welsh people in Wales? Or should that be more English speakers than Welsh speakers in Wales? Fascinating timeline btw, especially in these sad Brexit times. Love the idea of a UK that's moved far beyond Little Englander notions...
 
Have I missed a detail about 20th century Welsh history in this timeline where there are more English people than Welsh people in Wales? Or should that be more English speakers than Welsh speakers in Wales? Fascinating timeline btw, especially in these sad Brexit times. Love the idea of a UK that's moved far beyond Little Englander notions...

Obviously I can't speak for what @Teiresias meant exactly by that but I think the point was about English speakers rather than ethnic Anglo Saxons. That's certainly what I meant and there hasn't been substantial change to the ethnic make-up of Wales in TTL. The Welsh language is probably spoken more widely as a result of the different language education discussed above.

Glad you're enjoying the TL. I do find getting lost in this world somewhat therapeutic...
 
Obviously I can't speak for what @Teiresias meant exactly by that but I think the point was about English speakers rather than ethnic Anglo Saxons. That's certainly what I meant and there hasn't been substantial change to the ethnic make-up of Wales in TTL. The Welsh language is probably spoken more widely as a result of the different language education discussed above.

Glad you're enjoying the TL. I do find getting lost in this world somewhat therapeutic...
Believe me . I know exactly how you feel. :)
 
Steel Ministry (1991-1996)
When the Dogs Caught the Car: or, the Whigs and Tories Ride Again
3478401A00000578-3602897-image-m-7_1463875744200.jpg

Ferdinand Mount hobnobbing with the leaders of the Commonwealth Assembly groupings at a meeting in September 1993


Despite the dramatic circumstances of its birth, the Liberal-Conservative coalition proved to be very capable and work well together. Steel and Mount, in particular, proved to have a genuinely friendly working relationship. Despite the concerns of some, stoked by Labour during the election campaign, Steel’s Liberals did not revert to Thatcher-style slash-and-burn economics and instead governed as moderates concerned with sound public finances and harmonious domestic affairs. On the welfare state, Malcolm Bruce presided over a modest raising of benefit levels in 1993 and confirmed that social security would rise in line with inflation in the future. On race relations, the Home Secretary David Trimble expanded the powers of the Race Relations Board, empowering it to launch full public enquiries into institutions such as the Metropolitan Police Force, leading to an explosive report published in 1995 and dramatic reorganisations of the force’s internal culture to make it more responsive to what was termed ‘institutional racism.’

During the early part of the 1990s, the British economy was the beneficiary of the ‘credit crunch’ and subsequent social unrest in France, with much of the financial services work that had flowed to Paris since their ‘neoliberal’ reforms now flowing to London. Following the collapse of the Fourth Republic and the declaration of the Fifth in September 1993, the Bank of England agreed to make a special sterling credit line available to the French government in November 1994. This enabled the nascent government in France to solve its immediate liquidity problems (not, ultimately, that it would save them) but at the price of making the Commonwealth and the SWF France’s biggest creditors. The British government also undertook a series of measures to reform the regulation of the financial services industry, notably the Commodity Futures Act 1996, which modernised the regulation of derivatives trades. However, moves to undertake similar liberalising measures in respect of merchant and highstreet banking, which would have effectively removed the regulatory distinction between them, were blocked by David Triesman, the chairman of the Bank of England.

In foreign affairs, Steel attempted to chart what he called a ‘liberal’ foreign policy, which often brought him into conflict with his Foreign Secretary, the Conservative Rupert Carrington, who favoured a more Toryish isolationist approach. Allying with a cross-section of other Commonwealth prime ministers (notably John Button (Australia), Manmohan Singh (Pakistan), George Saitoti (East Africa) and Orton Chirwa (Rhodesia)) as well as the Commonwealth Chairman Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, Steel pushed through the South African Liberation Plan in 1993. In response to the continued apartheid regime of Andries Treurnicht (closely supported by his near-psychopathic lieutenants Eugène Terre'Blanche and Clive Derby-Lewis), the Plan argued that the South African government had committed numerous violations of international law and UN resolutions since the end of the Zulu-Natal War and committed the Commonwealth to a policy of ‘regime change’ in the country. Using this authority, Commonwealth planes undertook a four-day bombing campaign against alleged South African chemical weapons facilities in December 1994.

In Commonwealth affairs, the Assembly elections in 1995 were a landmark moment, with the Socialists losing their position as the largest party and allowing the Liberal Democrat Ken Clarke to be chosen as Speaker on the back of an informal alliance with the Conservatives and the Greens. Clarke, a former Liberal MP, proved energetic in the role, pushing forward on Commonwealth regulation in a number of directions. Perhaps the most significant moment was an agreement, in 1998, to expand the internet into other countries, linking it to other pre-existing networks around the world. Notable countries to ‘join’ the internet in this period were Brazil, the United States and France.

Arguably the most symbolically significant moment of Steel’s premiership, however, was completely out of his hands. In August 1991 the Drake 5 blasted off from its base in Woomera for its manned mission to Mars. On 23 December 1991, the British astronaut Michael Foale became the first human to set foot on another planet.

For the first three years of Steel’s premiership, the UK enjoyed robust economic growth and the Treasury reported budget surpluses, the majority of which was returned to the public via tax credits in the budgets of 1993 and 1994. However, as the country headed into the final quarter of 1994, a number of factors combined to make the economic outlook decidedly shakier. The most publicly obvious development was the failure of Rootes’ ‘New Beetle’ (the world’s first car to be powered entirely by solar energy) to gain popularity with Commonwealth drivers following its launch in 1991 and its unceremonious scrapping in August 1994. This, however, was just one feature of a general decline in the automobile market, the result of a general public shift away from personal cars to trains in the UK. At the same time, there was a plateauing of the increase in incoming capital from continential Europe as the continential economies (with the notable exception of France) staged recoveries. The UK also caught some of the backwash of the US 1993-94 recession that had been triggered by the bankruptcy of InGen Corporation following the Isla Nublar disaster.

Most significantly of all, however, seems to have been the actions of the Bank of England, which remain shrouded in controversy to this day. Following the Commonwealth-wide financial services boom from the late 1980s, concerns began to emerge in the mid-1990s that the economy could overheat, resulting in the Bank raising interest rates in the first two quarters of 1994, each time by 0.25%. While they did not move during the third quarter, a raise of 0.5% in October caused a notable slowdown in the construction industry and is believed to have been key in tipping the UK into a technical recession.

The key controversy arose from the role of David Triesman. Before being appointed to the chairmanship of the Bank in 1986 (as Evan Durbin’s handpicked replacement), Triesman, a youthful member of the Communist party, had been an economics lecturer and subsequently a Labour MP and junior treasury minister under Castle and Rodgers. This fueled allegations of partisanship (which had, admittedly, circled around Durbin too) which enraged Steel and many of the Liberals around him. Although Steel himself remained out of this, many of his media and Parliamentary outriders began a concerted campaign to shift blame from the government to the Bank. In particular, an attempt was made to portray the raises in interest rates as a partisan attempt to prevent an economic recovery before a general election.

(It should be noted that the debate around the Bank’s actions remain sharply polarised. On their face, the actions of a Bank managed by a former Labour hack do look distinctly unfriendly to the Liberals. But, on the other hand, the Bank’s primary aim now was Commonwealth macroeconomic stability and the rate cuts are often credited with playing a part in electoral victories as varied as the Australian Liberals in 1994 and the East African Socialists in 1996, not to mention with the protection of the Commonwealth economy as a whole from greater damage than was suffered.)

If Steel had been expecting a wave of support to follow behind him, he was sorely disappointed. He announced that he would be taking up the cause of Bank of England reform at the next prime ministers’ conference but when the other Big Four prime ministers (Jean Chretien of Canada, Manmohan Singh of Pakistan and Andrew Peacock of Australia) publicly distanced themselves from the idea, Steel was left looking isolated and impotent.

The theatrics with the Bank rather overshadowed what was actually a competent response to the downturn by all sides. The government authorised the temporary loosening of restrictions on mortgages to encourage construction and fast tracked rail improvements and other infrastructure work to counteract unemployment. Furthermore, when the Bank of England became aware of the extent of the recession, it made moves to act through monetary policy, announcing a cut in base rates in January 1995. The economy returned to growth in the second quarter of 1995, well before Steel dissolved Parliament and went to the country in spring 1996.
 
Last edited:
So, is Operation Enduring Teatime a go or not? I suspect it depends on whether the, um Ukrainian* coalition...Swedish* coalition...whatever, gets re-elected.



*because the country has a blue and yellow flag
 
During the early part of the 1990s, the British economy was the beneficiary of the ‘credit crunch’ and subsequent social unrest in France, with much of the financial services work that had flowed to Paris since their ‘neoliberal’ reforms now flowing to London. Following the collapse of the Fourth Republic and the declaration of the Fifth in September 1993, the Bank of England agreed to make a special sterling credit line available to the French government in November 1994. This enabled the nascent government in France to solve its immediate liquidity problems (not, ultimately, that it would save them) but at the price of making the Commonwealth and the SWF France’s biggest creditors.

... At the same time, there was a plateauing of the increase in incoming capital from continential Europe as the continential economies (with the notable exception of France) staged recoveries.
Oh why, oh why do I smell terrible things about to happen in France...
 
Top