The Alternate History of Modern Armor

MSZ

Banned
On another note, since this thread got me thinking. Suppose that rather than preparing for a massive conventional warfare in Europe, the XXth century is somehow spent preparing for colonial wars in extreme climates - equatorial jungles, middle eastern deserts, high mountains of Himalaya's etc. Essentially the idea to be stuck in the minds of army researchers that it was the weather/climate/biosphere of the area where conflict is to take place that was the greatest enemy, not the partizans/guerillas who don't even have artillery or planes. How could personal armour develop to withstand nature, not bullets and shrapnel?

Helmets with mosquito nets made out of super-thin but super-dense fibers covered in odourless bug repellant; uniforms being jumpsuits to prevent insects from crawling in and biting, with some internal fan to keep the body cool; military boots being higher and with broader outsoles to make it easier to walk on snow or sand. Stuff like that, uniforms being something like "enviroment suits". Any ideas?
 
On another note, since this thread got me thinking. Suppose that rather than preparing for a massive conventional warfare in Europe, the XXth century is somehow spent preparing for colonial wars in extreme climates - equatorial jungles, middle eastern deserts, high mountains of Himalaya's etc. Essentially the idea to be stuck in the minds of army researchers that it was the weather/climate/biosphere of the area where conflict is to take place that was the greatest enemy, not the partizans/guerillas who don't even have artillery or planes. How could personal armour develop to withstand nature, not bullets and shrapnel?

In fact, that is exactly what happened. The British developed all the contempory battlekit and battledress that was used in the late phases of the Boer War, and later in the Great War and since. Everything from the canteen in its modern form, to the sachell, weapon slings, kharki, and modern combat boots.

While soom of these items can be acredited to indeviduals not of British origin, it was a single army officer fighting in the Sudan in the 1880s in the age of Empire that took these ideas from locals and explorers and realised their use for the solider. Which were later taken on board by the British Army in 1901 when the British soliders kit was placed under scrutiny.

Indeed it is a travesty in some ways that the Great War happened some 13 years, later, since much of Europe stole these advancements in solidering kit over the next decade and put it into place in their own armies.

If the Great war had happened some 8 years earlier or so, then much of Europe (Germany, A-H, Russia, Italy) would have not have updated some of their gear or uniform and would still have been marching into battle prepared for a battle like in the Franco-Prussian war. Rather than for a longer campaign.

Only France and Mexico were the other two countries of their time to realise the needs of changing their solidering kit for the solider to be 'self sufficent' over extended periods of time. France because of Algeria, and Mexico because she asked Britian about how their soliders went about fighting 'in the bush'.

Odd these little quirks of history.

Source: How to Really Win at War: Bullets, Boots and Bandages

 
Last edited:
So giving heavy armour to infantry will slow them down so much that while they would be able to survive the first shot that hit them, they are much more likely to get with the next, and next, and next and die from one of them penetrating, while the infantry dude who managed to run to cover and stay there will live. For this reason heavy armour is issued rarely - only when it is perfectly known that the enemy will be engaged in CQC. These babies are so powerful that I heard a report from Afghanistan where one guy threw himself on a grenade thrown into the room he and his squad was, the grenade exploded under him and he survived - just lost all four limbs from the blast.

I'd have to assume you mean either Jason Dunham, who kept his limbs but died from the concussion later (in Iraq), or Matthew Croucher, who used his body armor and a rucksack and survived with minimum injuries (in Afghanistan).
 
Well I see some good ideas there (namely the laser pointer and the pepper spray), but that suit as a whole is a mess.
 
Last edited:
I was gone for a couple days. Long post ahoy! :D

One thing: I wasn't really thinking of ALL WWI and WWII soldiers having some sort of steampunked metal HALO helmet. I'm thinking more along the lines of the elite regiments. Snipers, non-combat Death Squads that use it for house raids and identity-concealing, and things like that, with almost all focus on the chest, head, and boots. A normal soldier might get a few small parts, like perhaps some wrist greaves, but would largely stay the same, at least for a while. Plus, in prototype form in a weird WWI, it could be made of leather, especially by the Germans, who made their pickelhauben out of leather, too. The Tommies would likely go for big and bulky, and Imperial/Soviet Russia, armor would be reserved for very special occasions, the generals preferring to use their troops as meatsacks.

Also, guys, I've actually drawn (I'm an artist) a prototype stahlhelm that has a light face mask and is sturdier than a regular one. The back of the head is not given any extra protection, and the ears are not blocked. The mask comes on and off, has intimidation, and would actually work against minor shrapnel.

It's all down to the end design.

WWI and WWII era helmets and for a good while afterwards (and even today) can only offer good protection from steel. However helmets were not initially designed to stop bullets, even today there is some very humerous disclaimers on much solider kit for stopping bullets that specifically says "This item does not protect the wearer from bullets or sharp pointed objects".

The point being, for many rifles they are powerful enough to penitrate the helmet anyhow. In reality body armour mostly protects from oblique angles, long range fire from SMG type weapons or low powered pistol rounds. Although I'm sure there will be some millitary types on these forums who can elaborate better.


Having said that the concept of 'in build gas mask' following on from the introduction of the helmet in WWI could be highly plausible. A gas mask needs two things, a visor to protect the eyes, and a tube for breathing. Connected to a scrubber.

If we assume that plastics can be manufactored to provide a wide angle field of view;

image

Check.

And that somebody has the smart idea of putting the scrubber on the persons back/sholder and then just a tube coming into the mask. Plausible. Then you cut down on a lot of the weight.

The issue is, a mask muffles your voice, and in the summer or cold weather it gets hot, or fogs. Therefore you don't want it on all the time. So instead if you can make it 'fold up' into the brim of the helmet, with a ridgid rubberised strip to fit between your ears and above your throat with a 'draw string' type jobby to get a good seal tighting from the back of the head and under the ears, and your onto a winner.

The clincher for this is to develop that space in engineering hard hats with the straps that give a space between the head and the helmet. Because this is where your hard plastic visor, and sides of the gas mask are going to go.

image

Check that one too!

The downer is it makes your head a bit taller, however this might save you because of lessened concussion against low powered shots. So it might balence out on that score for survivability.


However like has been said your sensory perception is much more enhanced by not covering the ears, or viewing the world through a visor. Therefore unless such 'face covering features' can be quickly and easily pulled down, or put up then its never going to work as a concept.

I really, really like this idea. Very clever. I've seen how long it took in WWI to put on and take off a gasmask, and put it in or take it out of a satchel, and this could result in men's time and lives saved. You need to stop firing to put it on or take it off, and that's when the other guy puts a bullet in your brain. I have two helmets, one a Vietnam M1 Helmet, and the other a Soviet WWII SSH 40, and both of them have excess room in between the straps and band and the liner, just enough I think for a leather gas mask to flip up into. :D

How about something like this

image

Thats a Warmachine 'trencher' infantryman, heavy wearing clothes but with metal armour on the shoulders, lower thighs a bit on the chest and the helm which has got a visor.

I like the trencher very much. Make it cheap metal and not so nice and decorative, and this is what I'm thinking of quite a bit. Not a full-blown suit of armor that'd overheat you in two minutes, but only on special areas.

Apparently they also used it (WWI body armor), sometimes, for fighting down in the tunnels when shafts being dug for planting 'mines' under one side's lines were intercepted by the other side's diggers...

That put a really neat image in my head of an armored, underground WWI battle. :eek:

I also suspect that the "does everything" helmet of the future would rapidly change to modular design where radios/NV goggles/splinter-shields/respirator...would be modular interchangeable units so you can update/repair/customize a helmet without having to draw a brandnew one from stocks.

Tim

Much like a clone trooper helmet. *nerd grin* I can't wait for future armored soldiers to have custom-painted designs.

images


:D

The new Dutch Army helmet is modular. The variant for the highest threats covers the entire head, it almost looks like a motorhelmet. see here for a picture: http://www.militair.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=5074



It's the other way around. It were the Soviets which used body-armor in WWII, amongst others in urban situations, see: http://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic.php?t=21011 (which includes a pic of a Finnish captured Soviet body-armor, so not restricted to urban situations).

Unfortunately especially in urban situations I'd value manoeuvrability and speed a lot. See the recent American experiences in Iraq for that; there are cases of personnel ditching gear - including armour - to get around quicker.

Your scenario would IMHO end a bit like this:

"After clearing a single house the 20 armoured troopers moved outside, where they were fired upon by a concealed MG. Because of their low speed, half of them were killed before they could reach safety. After reaching safety the combination of heat, the weight of the armour in addition to the other gear carried along and adrenalin resulted in half of the remaining troopers suffering a heart attack and dying. The remaining 5 troopers weren't in any shape to be used for more then a day".

:D

That Dutch helmet is unspeakably awesome. The US totally needs some.

I'm shocked by that link; Soviets were infamous for suicide assaults and using troops as redshirts (no pun intended :p ).



Still it DOES look really cool, doesn't it?

That's why we see it so often in Science Fiction.

Totally agree. There's something awesome about it.

A modern MICH helmet and MOLLE armor protects you from oblique and incedental fire and shrapnel only and from short range small arms fire from low or medium caliber weapons. not from anything greater or more powerfull than nonarmor piercing assault rifle rounds or pistol rounds.

High grade sniper rifle, and so on will go RIGHT through it.

Sorry.

Wow, sounds like a lot of our stuff is almost worthless. Thank heaven I haven't heard of a lot of terrorist snipers.

Thank you - I have one and never knew what those raised holes ("horns") were for.

And, depending on what kind you have, there should be another set of bolts a little farther back. That's ventilation. :)

That's for sure

Like a deranged Power Ranger

Ugh, it looks like he spray-painted trash from a garbage can silver and glued it onto a body-glove. :confused:
 
Snipers aren't limited to using official sniper rifles remember, a well maintained PTRD is still an effective weapon, even if it is bulky and obsolete.
 
Wow, I always think of them using old machine guns and explosives, not something that advanced.

Thank you for serving, by the way. :)

Like MattII said, they use anything they get to 'snipe' people sticking out of vehicle turrets (like I was).

They also frequently used captured US weapons, and I've even seen a Dragunov in a cache.

No problem, don't thank me, thank my recruiter. :D
 
Snipers aren't limited to using official sniper rifles remember, a well maintained PTRD is still an effective weapon, even if it is bulky and obsolete.
So's a Lee-Enfield, and the Afghans probably still have quite a few of those... although I suppose getting suitable ammunition for them might now be a problem...
 
Don't get me wrong, modern antibalistic armor is good, it does what it's supposed to do IE protect the head and vital organs from shrapnel and incedental fire. but in general they discourage us from striding abattlefied as if we are superman.

If a Soldier does what she's trained to do and uses cover and fire and maneuver tactics, the Armor just has to worry about the round adressed "To whom it may concern."
 
if we have to discus modern Amor suit, this is a must.

1354148864_e0a31c2078_o.jpg

Kerberos Panzer Cop and Jin-Roh: The Wolf Brigade by Mamoru Oshii
This german armor suit is used in WW2 in Oshii TL

About usefulness of modern armor: the question is against what you wanna use it ?
protection against enemy bullets ?
without modern technology like lightweight Kevlar
The armor will be heavy very heavy Steel and for a blitzkrieg infantry is this literal death weight...
 
Last edited:
images


The question is, is this ASB? ;) Seriously, KPC is one of my favorite sci-fi armors. Hot stuff. Reminds me a bit of the HYDRA troopers in the Cap'n America movie.

While the Kerberos armor is unrealistic, it does have some of what I'm thinking about, especially the hands, wrists, and helmet.

@SargeH: Lol, that gave me a good chuckle. I thought Kevlar makes you an invincible, minigun-toting agent of destruction. :p

@Metd and Simreeve: Seriously? A Dragunov? :eek: Okay, that's just scary.And Lee-Enfields...
 
images


The question is, is this ASB? ;) Seriously, KPC is one of my favorite sci-fi armors. Hot stuff. Reminds me a bit of the HYDRA troopers in the Cap'n America movie.

While the Kerberos armor is unrealistic, it does have some of what I'm thinking about, especially the hands, wrists, and helmet.

@SargeH: Lol, that gave me a good chuckle. I thought Kevlar makes you an invincible, minigun-toting agent of destruction. :p

@Metd and Simreeve: Seriously? A Dragunov? :eek: Okay, that's just scary.And Lee-Enfields...

no it's not ABS
the Armors suit was high tech in World War one, dominated by trench warfare
only problem World war two dominated the blitzkrieg and fast infantry.
although during Word War Two bring new invention: the Ballistic vest
like Doron Plate a strong fiberglass-based laminate used by US Army for infantry in the Battle of Okinawa in 1945
to protect them for flak and shrapnel and bullets

but WI the Germans R&D there version of the Ballistic vest after World War one ?
in the end it's gonna be armament race between armors and bullets that penetrate it...
 
images


The question is, is this ASB? ;) Seriously, KPC is one of my favorite sci-fi armors. Hot stuff.
"hot" looks like the right word to me: How long could a person wear that outfit for without passing out from heatsroke?

@Metd and Simreeve: Seriously? A Dragunov? :eek: Okay, that's just scary.And Lee-Enfields...
Plenty of them wold have been acquired one way or another either before or after they were phased out of use by Britain/India/Pakistan, they fire a .303 round with very good penetrating power and with a significantly better effective range than today's standard NATO rifles & bullets possess, being bolt-action rather than semi-auto helps with accuracy even without any extra modifications, and there's plenty of evidence that practiced marksmen -- which a lot of Pashtun tribesmen are -- can get good results with the basic design (let alone with the improved one that the British army's snipers continued to use for a couple of decades after the basic version had been replaced by the SLR as general issue) at quite a fair range...
 
Top