I've gotten the same impression from what little I've heard on it. And I'd agree, he's entitled to disgust. That's what happens when you get a role that turns out to be iconic (& you happen to be so damn good). Gielgud felt the same about "Arthur", but I'll bet you can't quote a single line he did except, "I'll alert the media."Brainbin said:My understanding was that he disliked doing the film and considered it beneath him ... Most of all, he loathed that this was what people remembered him for. And considering his incredibly accomplished career, I wouldn't begrudge him that.
I do wonder if there wasn't a space program influence. Spacecraft depended (& still depend) on dehydrated food to avoid adding to the mass fraction. (Once you get as much power as Enterprise would have had, that ceases to be an issue... Which brings me back to Gerrold, who, correctly, points out it also means power shortages should never have arisen. Corridors that damn wide? You've got power to burn.)Brainbin said:From what I understand, it was part of the culture of the era: in the 1950s
To which I have to add, "SG-1" did a cute tweak on it: the Asgard eat pill food. ("I like the yellow ones".) And, of course, they explain the "little green men", the alien abduction stories, even the bright lights just before being taken...
It does make me wonder: does that also mean Eddie lives? (And doesn't fake his death.)Brainbin said:Elvis Lives!
Amen.Brainbin said:And I want to see my version of Star Trek!
Amen.Brainbin said:Sometimes writing this timeline can be so bittersweet
Y'know, I dread the excesses he could get into with so much more to spend... Elvis bankrupt?Brainbin said:Not to mention that he'll keep far more of that money to himself
I didn't believe it then, either. I just didn't say anything.Brainbin said:Well, I mentioned the high quality of the commissary food in the previous update. So I was just following through
Fair enough. IDK if I'd have changed it, either, 'cause I take a view, people don't become different just from butterflies...unless those butterflies mean they have different experience. (Does that sound contradictory?)Brainbin said:Perhaps, but I've never been very good with names
No wonder I wouldn't have... I wouldn't have looked past the integrated cast & finding somebody able to fill a comparable role, then started looking through lists of TV actors.Brainbin said:Happy Days > needs alternate title > Rock Around the Clock > keep original theme to match title > original context of "Rock Around the Clock" song > Blackboard Jungle > produced by MGM > better management at MGM > re-release to ride wave of retro nostalgia > re-release gets good box-office > inspires television executives > integrated casts on television > Sidney Poitier breakthrough performance > young black actor who resembles Sidney Poitier > remembers 74th Academy Awards > Denzel Washington wins Oscar, gushes over Poitier > says "I'm always chasing you, Sidney" > lightbulb! > cast Denzel Washington in Welcome Back, Kotter in the Poitier analogue role.
I'm going to miss her. Unless she ends up in TTL's "Dallas"? (Tho that would keep Charlene from getting it... You do keep telling us TV's a zero-sum game...)Brainbin said:Sorry, she's too young to have avoided the butterflies.
Good riddance. (I simply can't believe Valerie thought Phillips was better looking.)Brainbin said:and that of Phillips, for that matter
I confess, I may've misunderstood, but I read a Carson bio (quite a few years ago, now...) indicating there was "clipping" of the 90m shows, leading to Carson "proposing" it be shortened. Could be that was it, & it never became official.Brainbin said:It was changed from 90 minutes to 60 in 1980 IOTL. As far as I know, it was never 75 minutes long in the Carson era.
And if I'd been paying more attention, I'd have noticed...Brainbin said:Actually, no. NBC is doing much better ITTL. In the 1975-76 season IOTL, they had just one Top 10 show and only three in the Top 30. They are roughly three times as successful IOTL by those metrics.
Do you have reasons for that? Allowing they're the same people, & the country/world is much the same...Brainbin said:What's also worth noting is that Carson is less successful relative to Cavett and Griffin
I didn't say it, but I do want to thank you for that. (I expect I'll be the only one.)Brainbin said:prevented the emergence of SNL
With that, I'll entirely agree. It was to the '70s what "Simon & Simon" was to the '80s. (And thank you for making me think of that connection.)Brainbin said:it has strong buddy-comedy influences
If neither is ever heard from, I'll give you my first-born.Brainbin said:Hartman will not make the acquaintance of either Brynn Omdahl or Andy Dick ITTL, both of which should make everyone eternally grateful.
My ignorance of "SNL" is so total, I couldn't comment.Brainbin said:who could possibly dislike him? phx?
I liked it. (Which will surprise nobody.) The mutual dislike struck me as more real than the often-contrived warmth of other shows. It was a nice change. (As for Macy, I got the feeling he was supposed to be a milquetoast, but I agree, better casting wouldn't have hurt.)Brainbin said:I never cared for Maude either - the characters were cold and unappealing in a way that all the ensembles on all the other Norman Lear shows weren't.
e_wraith said:Johnny Carson was awesome. The more time he has for his show the better. I am sad that I only got to experience his later years, but damn what a great comedian/talk show host.
It makes me sad you missed him, 'cause you missed one of the true legends. Nobody did it better. It was actually better when the monologue didn't work, 'cause then, you got to see just how damn good he really was. You didn't just see him deliver, you got to see him work. It was a rare show he didn't get the audience back. (I wouldn't have wanted to be one of the writers afterward, tho.)Brainbin said:Unfortunately, I missed him entirely. I'm too young to even remember when he went off the air, if my parents would have even let me stay up to watch it. So at least you have your memories.
And he did great interviews, too. For me, there are only 3 guys in late night that have been worth a damn: Carson, Snyder, & Charlie Rose. (I never liked Cavett as a host, tho he's a good guy.)
My impression is, he didn't mind the 90m, he minded nobody was watching parts of it.Brainbin said:he's staying on for 90 minutes, whether he likes it or not!
Agreed. It was also a lot harder to quit, then. The idea of nicotine as addictive, the counselling, & the patch, didn't exist. Nor was their, yet, public acceptance of the hazard.Brainbin said:I'm hesitant to have an OTL chain-smoker quit, especially as early as the 1970s. Nowadays, smokers will quit, largely because they face pressure to do so in every single part of their lives (to that point that it almost takes a special kind of stubbornness not to attempt to quit). Many of those pressures did not exist in the 1970s.
That would be the same one proposing deaths from cigarettes were actually good for the NHS. (I do love Humphrey. )NCW8 said:One episode of Yes, Prime Minister suggested it shoul be changed to "Dying of lung cancer may damage your health".
Also not a smoker; both of my parents were. My dad had to quit after a heart attack, & my mom finally gave it up with the help of a patch after several tries.
Can I suggest we're fortunate his XO wasn't Fletcher Christian?Brainbin said:James T. Kirk was based on none other than Daryl F. Gates