While the Moonraker post itself says it was Guy Hamilton:Jaws became a smash-hit, the biggest film of 1975, dwarfing even Moonraker (also directed by Spielberg) from the year before.
So should I consider the Moonraker post itself to take priority, with the mention in the JotF post being a legacy of a previous draft?Guy Hamilton, who had directed the iconic Goldfinger, along with the most recent film, Diamonds are Forever, would also helm Moonraker;
I found the source of my confusion!
The Journey of the Force post says Spielberg directed Moonraker:
While the Moonraker post itself says it was Guy Hamilton:
So should I consider the Moonraker post itself to take priority, with the mention in the JotF post being a legacy of a previous draft?
Thank you, THE OBSERVER! And might I also add, that is an excellent suggestion!
I actually didn't mean anything specific or even particularly foreboding in that passage; just that Read, like so many child stars before and since, simply won't capitalize on his early success.
I take it that he's the British equivalent of Jerry Springer?People seeing that title would probably expect a Jeremy Kyle type show with estranged family members beating each other up.
I take it that he's the British equivalent of Jerry Springer?
H..How is that even possible?!Kind of, but more low-rent and worse.
Inasmuch as Kubrick's Clockwork Orange doesn't get made, as its TTL equivalent seems to be 1984, I wonder if someone else might make an adaptation of the book, if it even exists. Perhaps you could have Paul Verhoeven do it, or suchlike. That sounds legendary.
The publication of the novel was in 1962, five years before the POD, so it still exists.
I can see Verhoeven in the director's seat. Heavy dark satire, perfect for him.
I just rewatched the film. It's personally my favorite Kubrick. If I even exist ITTL, it would probably be 1984, but I digress.
I was also thinking about Watchmen. Maybe Charlton doesn't even get bought by DC ITTL, which butterflies it all away.
Eh, Charlton wasn't doing so hot after their 60's heyday, and I guessing, with Gold Key taking the license business which Charlton jumped on in the late 70's, they'd probably still go out of business. And if Dick Giodario was still editor, he would still advise to buy it (he got his start in Charlton in the 60's.)
I had this whole synopsis of Watchmen for the Redhead universe in my head, with the Charlton heroes in mind.
Probably the best explanation is that, from what I know, Brainbin doesn't read many comics himself. It's hard for him to write what he doesn't know, and suggestions help.Hrm. In general, comics have been a bit ignored, haven't they? What about, oh, I don't know, Maus for instance?
One thing about Watchmen is that from what I know, it's very heavily inspired by the Nixon years, Vietnam, and then the post-60s distrust of the system in general. I'm a little curious about how you see something like Watchmen playing out given that a lot of that is butterflied.I had this whole synopsis of Watchmen for the Redhead universe in my head, with the Charlton heroes in mind.
Probably the best explanation is that, from what I know, Brainbin doesn't read many comics himself. It's hard for him to write what he doesn't know, and suggestions help.
One thing about Watchmen is that from what I know, it's very heavily inspired by the Nixon years, Vietnam, and then the post-60s distrust of the system in general. I'm a little curious about how you see something like Watchmen playing out given that a lot of that is butterflied.
It plays out with Moore's original intentions, of showing established superheroes in a darker, more realistic light, than the deconstruction of the American Dream the OTL one ended up doing as an extension of the Superhero examination. Instead of Nixon winning a fourth term, it's Reagan starting a Second one, and it isn't dwelled much on, except to establish that it is a different world. Also, many of the subplots are removed.
It's also non-canonical in regards to the Charlton heroes. It'll be retconned by an alternate "Crisis on Infinite Earths."
I had this whole synopsis of Watchmen for the Redhead universe in my head, with the Charlton heroes in mind.
Probably the best explanation is that, from what I know, Brainbin doesn't read many comics himself. It's hard for him to write what he doesn't know, and suggestions help.