Thanks to everyone for your kind words about my most recent update. I'll talk more about the finer details of
Those Were the Days, and how it differs from
All in the Family in terms of tone, plot, character development, and topical relevance, in the future.
Other than the lighter more optimistic trend, I'm not entirely certain I see how the changes in this series follow from the POD of this timeline, however.
On this one I will claim a little creative licence - for a few reasons. It's now over four years past the POD - and we're looking at the industry that's been affected the earliest by the changes it wrought. The butterflies are out in full force, and as I mentioned earlier, casting is perhaps the most ephemeral aspect of film and television production. Everything has to line up
just right. And it's not as if I picked Dreyfuss and Marshall's names out of a hat - both were finalists for their respective roles IOTL.
Glen said:
Now then, having said that, Marshall is way better than Struthers for my tastes, and its just interesting to see how Dreyfuss in this series will change things down the road - really enjoy Reiner as a director, but he wasn't my favorite either, though that may have been the character more than the actor.
Their interpretations of Richard and Gloria will be a major focus of the next update to cover the series.
The OTL version was never one of my favorite shows, either, though my parents loved it (IIRC AFRTS did show it on Okinawa, though a season or two behind). I think, admittedly, that may have been because I wasn't quite old enough to get all the issues or appreciate the humor, and besides dialogue-driven shows like that have always been hard for me to appreciate without closed-captioning
It doesn't surprise me that the #1 show for five years running made it to Okinawa - though I imagine the references to Nixon after Jimmy Carter had been inaugurated would be awfully jarring. Then again, people
still love the show even today, right?
joea64 said:
BTW, Brainbin, I think the initial research into that technology is being done about now; do you think you could take a look at it sometime? I doubt there'll be any changes from OTL but it's a technological thing readers might be interested in.)
I have to admit, that's not a route I was planning on taking, but it
does suit the timeline, and where would we be without the announcement (which, ironically enough, is always
voiced in addition to being displayed on-screen) that "
this program is available in closed-captioning for the hearing-impaired"? Expect an update to
pop up (

) at some later point in the "Me Decade".
joea64 said:
I never much liked the characters of Gloria and Mike as played by Sally Struthers and Rob Reiner, either. The former seemed to me to be too much of a doormat and the latter often came across to me as a classic Jerkass, with the probably unintended (or was it?) consequence that I often found myself rooting for Archie in their clashes.
It wasn't intended by Lear, but it
was intended by O'Connor. Don't get me wrong: O'Connor was just as liberal as Lear, perhaps even more so; but he understood that Archie was the salt of the Earth, a hard worker who held his views because of ignorance and missed opportunities, and who
did, to be fair, grow as a character throughout the show's run. Mike, on the other hand, was a classic ivory tower, limousine liberal hypocrite (the episode "The Games Bunkers Play", one of my personal favourites, demonstrates this beautifully) who never,
ever budged or learned to compromise. I'll get into this delicate balance of character and ideology some more later on, but this is part of the reason that I'm choosing to focus on this show: it's an
intriguing sociological experiment.
joea64 said:
I don't have any strong feelings about Penny Marshall, but I quite like Richard Dreyfuss; I would say that if
Close Encounters of the Third Kind is made TTL, and Dreyfuss gets the lead, there will be a LOT of jokes.
Maybe, but let's not get ahead of ourselves just yet
I'm not going to bust you for keeping it (or say you should change it now

), but this was the biggest flaw in the theme. Was it a
used LaSalle? It really would have to be, 'cause I don't feature Arch ever earning enough to own a new one. (Or his father, either, which is about how old it'd be.) Bear in mind, this was the "entry level" Caddy of the '30s!
Every OTL version of the theme song kept the "LaSalle" stanza. Choosing to
end the whole song with it, as in most versions, is a big mistake ("I don't know just what went wrong" is
much stronger, as is "Where did all that beauty go", the closing line from the 1968 pilot). Another problem is that Archie and Edith sang the line in unison, making it incomprehensible; hence the reason it got more drawn out and clearly enunciated in later versions. In the 1968 pilot, as well as the rendition from TTL, Archie alone sings the line.
phx1138 said:
Or am I missing intentional irony?

Those lyrics really belong to Arch & Edith's
parents, not them.
Assuming that the lyrics were meant for the WWI generation, it
does explain what is otherwise the oddest line in the song: the longing for Hoover. Surely Calvin Coolidge would fit the meter just fine? But no, they're not talking about
President Hoover; they're talking about "The Great Humanitarian" Hoover. So I think you're right on the money.
phx1138 said:
An intriguing choice. That would appear to butterfly out "Laverne & Shirley"

...
Not a fan of "
Schlemiel! Schlimazel! Hasenpfeffer Incorporated!", I take it?
phx1138 said:
Casting Richard Dreyfus... That's liable to make him unavailable for "Graffiti".

(Billy Crystal, anyone?

) And "Dillinger" (Baby Face Nelson). And the title role in "Duddy Kravitz". And "Jaws".


"Goodbye Girl" & "CE3K", too?
Quite remarkable how big a star he was in the 1970s, isn't it? Now, are you formally suggesting Crystal for the role in
Graffiti? Because I might just consider it... And as for
Duddy Kravitz, I'm sure Richler won't care who plays him, as long as it's a Jewish actor. What's interesting is that, IOTL, Dreyfuss took the role in
Jaws as a direct result of his dissatisfaction with his portrayal of Duddy Kravitz.
phx1138 said:
IMO, it dramatically changes the dynamics between Arch & "the Meathead". (Does he even get called that?

) I really can't see Dreyfus as the layabout hippie Rob Reiner played (presuming that's where the character goes at all).
Richard will indeed be called "Meathead"; that was a term that Norman Lear's father used in real life, and it
is too good to go to waste. I'll get into how Dreyfuss' portrayal differs from Reiner's later on, but you're definitely on the right track.
phx1138 said:
I do agree, Struthers was probably the weakest cast member, & a real doormat. How much of that was weak writing
for her, IDK. I've never quite figured out how writers will,
can, create major characters with no future.
Struthers' weakness as an actress (which is actually very common; it's the reason that a lot of actors are so uneven) is that she's only as good as the material she's given. She certainly had her moments on the show, and generally interacted well with both O'Connor and Stapleton. Gloria just wasn't well-written for the most part, and I can't really blame the writers - she was a baby boomer and a female in the era of women's liberation, and none of them had any idea how to write for that. (I suspect part of the reason they made Mike a chauvinist was as tacit acknowledgement of that fact - and to reinforce his hypocritical tendencies.)
Agreed, but somehow I don't see Penny Marshall letting that kind of writing happen to a character she is playing. The Father-Daughter dynamic will definitely be different ITTL on this show!
Again, I'll detail her portrayal and how it differs from Struthers' interpretation at a later date, but you are also on the right track.
It looks like the next update won't be ready until this weekend, for a couple of reasons: for one, the dreaded RL is threatening to encroach on me and I'm just barely holding it back; and two, I have another commitment, upon which I'm toiling away. I'm not at liberty to disclose the nature of this commitment, but it is on a deadline that's rapidly approaching. Once I clear that threshold, things should start moving a little faster, and I don't think I'll be going below a minimum of one update per week. But I'm just keeping you all abreast of the situation. Please feel free to continue your ongoing discussion, and I'll talk to you all again soon.