And now for the last volley of responses for the year 2011!
One thing I forgot to mention in regard to suspension of disbelief...
This is a very thoughtful and thorough analysis, and I don't have anything in particular to say in response, but thank you for your input.
That is the biggest hurdle to overcome now in positing Savalas in anything...

Even if he really is the right choice.
We'll have to see if he still has occasion to say "Who loves ya, baby?" ITTL.
phx1138 said:

One right: "Police Squad". (Hint: I've dropped mentions of some of them...) I've never even
heard of "Keen Eddie".
All right, more guesses. "The Greatest American Hero", "Twin Peaks", "My World and Welcome to It", and "Alien Nation".
phx1138 said:
Oh, no. "Titular" is "in the title". So...
It just doesn't look
right without the "Wacky"
phx1138 said:
Not judging by the ratings of the nightly newscast...
Now, I didn't actually want to come out and
say that, because I thought it might be rude... But yeah. If you're stuck in
third place behind
Global, you have no room to even
think something like that, Mansbridge.
Who's heading Universal's Television division in the early 1970s? Looking at the history of the development of Kojak, it is by no means certain that we see the same chain of events that led to the creation of the character, Kojak - on the other hand, we might.
Excellent question. That's going to take some further investigation.
So, looking a bit more at that link I posted previously,
Moonbase 3 seems like a perfect series for the times [...] It could be a small but critically aclaimed series that could act as a seed for other hard sci-fi movies and series in future.
Duly noted. I'll be sure to take that into consideration.
While giving due credit to "Mary Tyler Moore", recognitions deserves to be given to a forerunner program, "That Girl" starring Marlo Thomas. A sitcom about a young woman who has moved to the big city on her own to fulfill her ambitions, it also featured intelligent writing, realistic situations, and witty byplay.
Thank you for pointing that out. You've actually noticed something about the entertainment industry worth discussing. "Mary Tyler Moore" is remembered as the trailblazer because after it,
other shows followed its lead. "That Girl" was an anomaly, a precursor. "Ahead of its time", as the saying goes. So you're right, but
for the purposes of pop culture history, you're wrong. There are actually lots of other examples of this sort of thing in television, movies, music...
That's not going to happen ITTL (which, BTW, probably means his ego grows to new undreamt of heights!).
The bigger the ego is, the harder they fall

.
This will be true of Shatner if he doesn't have that slump.
I think you make an
excellent point, Unknown
The immediate post-Star Trek period for Nimoy is harder, especially given the hints Brainbin has given us already. It appears this timeline is good for Shatner, but may be worse for Nimoy.
As already mentioned, the original leads stay on this show, and given what Brainbin has said about alcohol, I fear that Nimoy may take a nosedive after the series ends.
I have definite plans for Nimoy, and they'll be made clear in the next few updates. You've correctly observed that he had far and away the best career of any of the
Star Trek alumni in the 1970s IOTL, which I think we can credit to his acting ability.
"Kelley thereafter did a few television appearances and a couple of movies but essentially went into de facto retirement other than playing McCoy.[5]"
I think this is precisely what he will do ITTL.
I'm willing to reveal Kelley's fate because, indeed, it will be almost exactly as IOTL. Bear in mind that he's making two extra seasons' worth of money from
Star Trek, and we're looking at
big raises for Seasons 4
and 5. Given his utter exhaustion after five long years playing Dr. McCoy - work that, once again, he is on record as having found "grueling" - he'll be going into semi-retirement right away. (Yes, that means no
Night of the Lepus. You're welcome.) He'll have a nest egg, yes, but where will the extra money come from?
Glen said:
"By 1978 he was earning up to $50,000 ($168,000 today) annually from appearances at Star Trek conventions attended by Trekkies.[6]"
Personal appearances - and I refuse to explain any more clearly than that - will supplement his income nicely ITTL.
Glen said:
BTW, my Trekker contacts tell me he was a very, very popular man on the convention circuit, considered a real gentleman and professional.
By all accounts, he was the nicest member of the cast. (I've alluded to this within the TL proper.) I have no intention of changing that.
Glen said:
He stayed married to his wife through it all IOTL, and will do so as well ITTL I feel.
Oh, fear not, he'll be "happy in the valley, with the very same wife", till death do them part, just as IOTL.
Glen said:
His bio did bring up some very interesting questions - first, how will the Trek Convention culture develop ITTL, and will Desilu take an active role in being involved with them at some point? Second, what kind of money will the actors from Star Trek be receiving from the re-runs and merchandising ITTL? Will Desilu do better by them than Paramount did?
There's only one way to find out!
James (Jimmy) Doohan's career will likely be the same as IOTL, with he as well being a mainstay of the convention circuit after Star Trek, but aside from the movies not doing much else acting-wise.
Likewise, Doohan will go into semi-retirement after the end of
Star Trek, just as IOTL. But I might have some interesting plans for him...
Glen said:
His 1974 meeting of his future third wife and their marriage is likely to be butterflied away by filming the Star Trek movies, which will be a big difference in his personal life.
I don't know if I'd brush off that tenacious young lady so cavalierly, Glen. She'll still be a Trekkie ITTL, no doubt about it, and by any outward appearances, all it would take is just the one meeting. IOTL, the marriage certainly seemed to be a very happy one.
Technically, the Administrator of NASA is not
in Cabinet - it's recognized as a position of Cabinet-
level rank - similar to the Trade Representative, or the Ambassador to the UN. And no, she won't become the Administator; everyone appointed to that position is going to be either a scientist or a military officer, or both. Will she become
involved with NASA, as she did IOTL? I certainly wouldn't count it out.
After reviewing their stints on Star Trek, I can see why you promoted John Winston to a recurring cast member - I agree that is a likely outcome.
Thank you. Like I said, they really seemed to like both the character (who made several appearances on TAS),
and the actor (who made a cameo in TWOK). Given the greater budget, I think he'd be one of the first in line to reap the rewards.
Glen said:
Oddly enough, I have no real recollection of the character on Star Trek - don't know why, but he never made any impression on me, apparently (and I am rewatching TOS with my eldest child, and he still isn't standing out to me).
His most memorable appearance is actually not technically
him - at the beginning of "Mirror, Mirror", his parallel universe counterpart is the one that Mirror!Spock punishes with the Agonizer. He, on the other hand, is personally knocked out by someone attempting to escape the ship in all three of his appearances in the first season: Capt. Christopher, Khan, and Dr. McCoy, respectively.
Glen said:
For some odd reason, it's
Bruce Hyde's character of Kevin Thomas Riley who stands out in my mind as an associate player, and in fact was quite surprised to see he only appeared in two episodes! I guess him taking over the engine room and singing, "I'll take you home again, Kathleen," really made him stand out in my memory? It's just weird.
Everyone remembers Riley - and I have no doubt that the producers would have noticed that and made him a regular - perhaps even in place of Chekov, given his youth (only 25-26 years old, and looked younger, during the first season) - but they ran into a snag. It was 1967, and Bruce Hyde decided to become a hippie. No,
really. That's why we never saw him again. But he seems to have no regrets.
I hope to have the next update ready tonight, to end the year with a bang, but I can't promise anything. If not, well then tomorrow I should be able to
start the new year with a bang! So until then, thank you all for reading my timeline this year!
