With the Battle of Mosul currently underway and the end of ISIS nearing, what would it take for ISIS to be more successful, perhaps even capturing Baghdad or Kobane?
US would never use nukes unless it was WWIII. Every country and every US politician would lose their shit. It'd be an act of war against Iraq and pointless since they could achieve the same effect with conventional weapons. I wouldn't be surprised if the president would get impeached and NATO would lose a few members over something like that.Sorcery, basically. If that were in any danger of happening ( the fall of Baghdad I mean), you may expect the use of tactical nuclear weapons by the US ( 10 kt apiece or less) to eliminate ISIS troop formations approaching the city.
US would never use nukes unless it was WWIII. Every country and every US politician would lose their shit. It'd be an act of war against Iraq and pointless since they could achieve the same effect with conventional weapons. I wouldn't be surprised if the president would get impeached and NATO would lose a few members over something like that.
Real life isn't a RTS strategy game.
I'm not so sure. I'm sure there may be plenty of rhetoric and boasting about our nukes, but when it comes to actually carrying out the nastier parts of his rhetoric Trump usually falls short. He's already admitted he's not jailing Hillary, and he's tried to delete some of his campaign proposals from his website before the controversy restored them.Well, Trump and probably many others on his cabinet probably would are very willingful to use nukes. They are mad enough.
Probably you would need more moderate and sensible ISIS that it could be succesful. And such probably hardly try capture Baghdad nor it wouldn't even try create large caliphate. And probably it would help too that it doesn't go bombing and shooting Europeans so there not be so strong anti-ISIS thing.
Trump isn't as bad as the tabloids make him out to be. He's not going to nuke anybody.Well, Trump and probably many others on his cabinet probably would are very willingful to use nukes. They are mad enough.
No absolutely not this is just so wrongSorcery, basically. If that were in any danger of happening ( the fall of Baghdad I mean), you may expect the use of tactical nuclear weapons by the US ( 10 kt apiece or less) to eliminate ISIS troop formations approaching the city.
Trump isn't as bad as the tabloids make him out to be. He's not going to nuke anybody.