Stefan IV Dusan - Constantine XI

Thanks for the feedback, everyone. :)

CHAPTER IX - REBELLION AND RESETTLEMENT

The year 1358 would mark a difficult period in the life of Constantine XI Dusanes. In February, his beloved life Maria had succumbed to the plague. In April, his eldest son Uroses was killed in battle while putting down a Turkish uprising in Western Bithynia. The 10-year-old Manuel Dusanes became the Rhomanian heir apparent, and Dusanes became fiercely protective of this bright young boy. Dusanes's youngest child, Thomas, was a sickly three-year-old who would not survive his father. As retribution for the death of his eldest son (and probably at the behest of the Servian nobility), Dusanes resettled many Turks of Bithynia to Thrace and Thessaly, replacing them with Servian and Roman settlers. His successors continued his policy with even greater ardor. The Servian settlers would found what is today the important port city of Novigradi, located some 30 miles away from Pergamos. Talks of reconquest in Candar and a possible invasion of Bulgaria did not materialize into any military action, and Dusanes continued his cautious but all-important task of reincorporating his conquests into the Empire. I will not bore my readers with the numerous legal reforms which Dusanes attempted (most of which would sadly not survive him), as far more important events were occurring outside the Empire at this time.

In February 1361, a popular Roman uprising in Athens headed by the young fisherman Nicholas led to the overthrow (and death) of Roland of Sicily, the provincial despot. Roland's nephew and king, Frederick III of Sicily, had succumbed to the plague a year previously. He had died childless, and the four prominent Sicilian baronial families had been involved in a prolonged and increasingly bloody struggle for control over the island. Though this certainly helped Nicholas and his fellow rebels, the local Latin garrison did not give up without a fight. It took until late Summer for the Romans to secure the city and its surroundings. With the Aragonese busy trying to sort out the troubles in Sicily, Nicholas was given free reign - for how long, he would not know. As we shall see, he took full advantage of this power vacuum. In September, Nicholas rather foolishly declared himself "basileus and autokrator of the Romans." My readers are probably horrified by this sacrilegious proclamation, but I should mention that this audacious peasant was truly loved by the people. His accomplishments on the battlefield against the Latins would finally reestablish Roman rule in Athens, even if Dusanes would not take too kindly to the young leader's brashness.

During this time, the Germiyans continued to consolidate their position as the most powerful Turkish state in Asia Minor. The Sultanate of Rum continued to make incursions into Eretnan territory, and by early 1359 the Sultan Mustafa had moved his capital to newly-captured Ikonion, called Konya by the Turks. Later that year, Hirakleia and Archelais had also fallen, and Mustafa Bey set his sights on the Eretnan capital, Ancyra. One cannot forget that a large part of Mustafa's forces were on loan from Dusanes, mainly Muslim Bithynian Turks led by early Urum converts. One such convert and commander, Michael Aidinoglou (a cousin of John the Turk) distinguished himself in battle, and earned the admiration and respect of the Sultan. An undated letter recently found in an old library somewhere in Turkish Ancyra illustrates the perhaps scandalous extent of this admiration:

Mehmed [Michael's birth name], my son, I would like to extend my sincerest thanks for your recent victory in Eregli [Hirakleia]... If only you had kept the faith of your fathers, you would have truly been a son to me. When we last met in Konya, I could not help but note that my daughter, Yesim, had taken quite a liking to you... Would you not come back, follow the Prophet's path, and revert to Islam? You know little Greek, and their ways are foreign to you. I am an old man...I have no sons, I do not trust the fools I call brothers... I need a man who can continue my work and bring glory to our Sultanate. Are you that man?

I should note that some Turkish historians have dismissed this letter as 16th century forgery. Others, including the eminent Zeki Pamuk, have testified to its authenticity. If the letter (assuming its authenticity) had been made public, Michael would certainly have been dismissed from his position and perhaps even accused of treason. Whatever may be the case, we can be certain of a few things. One, Michael never did revert to Islam, though he continued to serve under the Sultan on Dusanes's behalf. Two, primary sources point to the likelihood of an affair between Yesim and Michael during stay at Ikonion, though we know that Michael went on to marry a daughter of the Servian despot of Epirus. And finally, this would not be the last time an Aidinoglou was offered the hand of a Germiyan.
 
Very nice!

I like how your updates are not too long, but packed with lots of interesting information.

It's good that Byzantium has reincorporated Athens and created a connection to the Catholic powers of Sicily in this way. Look forward to seeing how that plays out.

Nicholas the Fisherman is an interesting character, having proclaimed himself Basileus and Autokrator, however, he will be a very awkward character in the wider Empire - and the Emperor will be forced to deal with him. I suggest that maybe negotiations, and a marriage alliance take place with a minor daughter of the Dusanes, which leads to Nicholas accepting the title of Despot of Athens. However, he will soon cause the government problems - unless they give him something important to do, e.g. reconquest of certain Aegean islands, or an offensive against the Croatians, Hungarians or Bulgarians maybe?

Similarly, with Michael/Mehmed the Turk I'm not sure such a successful war-leader would be content to be an underling, especially under a weak Sultan who was childless. Perhaps, Michael/Mehmed is fond of the old man - they play backgammon, chess and quote Jalal ad-Din Rumi to each other - as well as his daughter :) so he never considers rebelling. However, the Germiyanids and Byzantines should give him a project to get on with. Perhaps they give him some territory at the edge of their lands (between Mudurnu and Eskishehir) and declare him the 'Despot of Paphlagonia'. He would then (possibly in alliance with the Komnenids of Trebizond) slowly reconquer Chandar over many years, taking Ancyra and Kastamonou, and these then become a genuine laboratory of Greco-Turkish culture: new music, art, religious mixing - i.e. basically where the Urums emerge. You could have Michael/Mehmed attract Greeks back into the area by offering low tax rates and a life of adventure. In years to come, possibly this area should reunite with Byzantium, but Anatolia should never lose its distinctive Turkishness. Perhaps this Christian Turkey becomes one of the Empire's enduring strengths in years to come...

Anyway, just a few ideas for you to think about... ;)
 
Got a map? I could make one if you don't.

Oh, and one more thing on the H situation. It's Rome, Romans, Romagna/Romania. Can't have it both ways: are you the Greek Empire or actually Romans?
 
Megas Dux ton Kypraion said:
Similarly, with Michael/Mehmed the Turk I'm not sure such a successful war-leader would be content to be an underling, especially under a weak Sultan who was childless. Perhaps, Michael/Mehmed is fond of the old man - they play backgammon, chess and quote Jalal ad-Din Rumi to each other - as well as his daughter :) so he never considers rebelling. However, the Germiyanids and Byzantines should give him a project to get on with. Perhaps they give him some territory at the edge of their lands (between Mudurnu and Eskishehir) and declare him the 'Despot of Paphlagonia'. He would then (possibly in alliance with the Komnenids of Trebizond) slowly reconquer Chandar over many years, taking Ancyra and Kastamonou, and these then become a genuine laboratory of Greco-Turkish culture: new music, art, religious mixing - i.e. basically where the Urums emerge.

Great ideas :). I knew that I wasn't done with Michael, and a future career as a military governor seems proper.

MNPundit said:
Got a map? I could make one if you don't.
PM'd the specifications. ;)

Megas Dux ton Kypraion said:
Maybe the Turks in Thrace start referring to their country as Rumeli...
Never mind what they call the country, just wait 'til you see the trouble the Thracian Turks cause the Empire once a syncretistic Islamo-Christian sect arises in their community. :p
 
Never mind what they call the country, just wait 'til you see the trouble the Thracian Turks cause the Empire once a syncretistic Islamo-Christian sect arises in their community. :p

Ha. You are thinking along the same lines as I am! Let's have this sect be the Alevi-equivalent in the Byzantine Empire as it stretches its control into Turkified lands. And let this "Alevism" be explosively popular among the Anatolians, and equally difficult to stamp out as Sunni Turks IOTL have discovered. :)
 
Constantine XI Dusanes

Map of the relevant powers in about 1360.

GreccoSerb2.jpg
 
Hmmm...

Looking at that map, it's going to be difficult for Constantinople, out in the "far east" of the Empire, and with strong enemies nearby, to govern that whole mass of territory further west, let alone south.

I think there needs to be a sort of West/East split, like the Empire has experienced many times before, at least until the Serb and Greek halves of the Empire are tested together, and come through stiff challenges from outsiders together.

Possibly you could have the following institutional development:

-Grand Domestic of the West (or the 'Serbs'), based in Thessalonica and governing the interests of the new settlers, the military and other Serb 'national' interests.

-Grand Domestic of the East (or the 'Rhomaioi'), based in Constantinople and governing in the interests of the traditional Byzantine aristocracy and wealthy civic families, the reclaimed Asia Minor territories, the islands etc.

It will look like a recipe for the Empire to fragment but, after the two Grand Domestics act jointly to save the Empire a couple of times, things start to bed down - and the two halves of the Empire start to develop a fellow feeling for each other.
 
Hmmm...

Looking at that map, it's going to be difficult for Constantinople, out in the "far east" of the Empire, and with strong enemies nearby, to govern that whole mass of territory further west, let alone south.

I think there needs to be a sort of West/East split, like the Empire has experienced many times before, at least until the Serb and Greek halves of the Empire are tested together, and come through stiff challenges from outsiders together.

Possibly you could have the following institutional development:

-Grand Domestic of the West (or the 'Serbs'), based in Thessalonica and governing the interests of the new settlers, the military and other Serb 'national' interests.

-Grand Domestic of the East (or the 'Rhomaioi'), based in Constantinople and governing in the interests of the traditional Byzantine aristocracy and wealthy civic families, the reclaimed Asia Minor territories, the islands etc.

It will look like a recipe for the Empire to fragment but, after the two Grand Domestics act jointly to save the Empire a couple of times, things start to bed down - and the two halves of the Empire start to develop a fellow feeling for each other.
So are the Bulgars going to be the villains in the west, or the Hungarians?
 
You would have to include the Turks in that equation because by this point in time, Asia Minor is mostly settled by the Turks and what territories this revamped Serbian-Greek empire has in that area is populated by Turks. Any imperial governmental office that devotes to affairs in the eastern territories needs to include the Turks in. From what I'm reading so far and what B-G has hinted, the Turks need to be included into that Byzantine power structure. I do not think Dusanes and his successors would be unwise to risk any alienation of the Turks unless they want to boost their enemies further east. Same goes for the Serbs and other Slavic populations that dwell in whatever territories that is not mostly populated by Greeks. Perhaps revive the old Byzantine Senate if it hasn't already faded out of existence and have provincial interests be heard by Dusanes and his successors.

Now for the map. The border for me doesn't look at all that great for the Byzantines especially the one they share with the Bulgarians. It looks like a spot for some potential problems and why bother having those problems? Perhaps Dusanes late in his reign or his successors down the line might consider planning preliminary steps towards reconquering Bulgaria or at the very least making it a vassal state so its north-western border is secure from attack. As for the Athenian upstart Nicholas, I say it would be wise for Dusanes to play diplomacy with him and pretend to tolerate his existence for a while, perhaps have him marry into the family or something. Anything that could have Dusanes or his successor to have a credible claim on Athens.
 
I tend to agree about these comments of awkward frontiers. I think the preliminary parts of the reign of Manuel II (that's Dusanes' successor right?) should be devoted to subjugating Bulgaria, either through a wholesale annexation, or at the very least vassalisation. After that, he can turn his attention to either the Turks or the Latins at leisure, with the Danube frontier secured.
 
I tend to agree about these comments of awkward frontiers. I think the preliminary parts of the reign of Manuel II (that's Dusanes' successor right?) should be devoted to subjugating Bulgaria, either through a wholesale annexation, or at the very least vassalisation. After that, he can turn his attention to either the Turks or the Latins at leisure, with the Danube frontier secured.

Are relations between the Byzantines and the Venetians well because that would be the major threat to any restoration of the Empire. If they are good, I don't think Manuel II would need to worry much about them as long as he placates them for the time-being. There's also the matter of Cyprus, it's controlled by the Latins and is a mainly Greek possession. I would forsee Manuel II eventually consider plans to reincorporate what was formerly Byzantine lands back into the Empire? And as for Hungary being a possible adversary, perhaps it would be wise to help its vassals in Wallachia out in winning independence. It would make for a good buffer state.
 
Bulgaria at this time is under Ivan IV Alexander, so it's actually doing okay. If he somehow dies though, Bulgaria is probably going to politically disintegrate like it did in OTL to a point. Not to mention the Golden Horde raiding from the northwest. Personally I'd predict a Turkish incursion that retakes Aydin or maybe the former Ottoman lands while the Serbs are engaged in subduing Bulgaria. This since Bulgaria while not great militarily right now seems to be so fragmented it would take significant time to subdue.
 
Bulgaria at this time is under Ivan IV Alexander, so it's actually doing okay. If he somehow dies though, Bulgaria is probably going to politically disintegrate like it did in OTL to a point. Not to mention the Golden Horde raiding from the northwest. Personally I'd predict a Turkish incursion that retakes Aydin or maybe the former Ottoman lands while the Serbs are engaged in subduing Bulgaria. This since Bulgaria while not great militarily right now seems to be so fragmented it would take significant time to subdue.

Would be somewhat original if there's some substantial Turkish immigration from Asia Minor to Bulgarian lands to escape Byzantine persecution (I'll assume that because of the times, the local Christians will consider the Muslims second class citizens if citizens of any status at all. Maybe a couple go to Bulgaria, serve the Tsar there as mercenaries in the army, perhaps take advantage of the situation. A Muslim ruled Turkish state in Bulgaria would be nice.
 
Would be somewhat original if there's some substantial Turkish immigration from Asia Minor to Bulgarian lands to escape Byzantine persecution (I'll assume that because of the times, the local Christians will consider the Muslims second class citizens if citizens of any status at all. Maybe a couple go to Bulgaria, serve the Tsar there as mercenaries in the army, perhaps take advantage of the situation. A Muslim ruled Turkish state in Bulgaria would be nice.
It seems unlikely that they would go west into Europe when there are Turkish ruled Muslim polities right next door in Rum. It might make more sense for the Turks in Thrace to do so (and I think it would be neat, maybe even precipitate a major Golden Horde play south?) but IIRC they got converted?
 
It seems unlikely that they would go west into Europe when there are Turkish ruled Muslim polities right next door in Rum. It might make more sense for the Turks in Thrace to do so (and I think it would be neat, maybe even precipitate a major Golden Horde play south?) but IIRC they got converted?

Even with forced conversions of the Muslim Turk populations in Thrace, I doubt they would all become Christians within the range of Dusanes' reign. No doubt there would be some Turks who would easily switch from Islam to Christianity [especially if B_G has Dusanes or his successors down on the line implement a Christian analogue to the jizya tax impossed on the People of the Book] Most would remain Muslim for at least a couple of more generations and even those who might convert, some might practice Islam privately in their homes for several centuries more. Perhaps some Turks rebel in Thrace, perhaps to the point that they are considered so much of a threat that they're dispersed to the rest of the Empire. A couple make it to Bulgaria.

Also a Christian Turkish state in northern Bulgaria would be pretty cool.
 
Top