What if Michael Jordan was a success in Baseball and was called up to the majors?
WI if Ernie Davis, who was the # 1 overall draft pick in the 1962 (surprisingly held in December of 1961), did not have Leukimia.
He was drafted by Washington, and then traded prior to the season to the Cleveland Browns. He never played a down for them.
The Browns still had Jim Brown in 1962. Jim Brown retired before the start of the 66 season. So from 62 - 65, no matter how good Ernie Davis was, I just can't see him making that much of a difference to the Browns during that period.
In 62, last year with Paul Brown as Head Coach, they went 7-6-1. Jim Brown was merely mortal that year. But the Browns would need to win 5 more games to beat the 12 and 2 Giants for the division title to make the playoffs. Davis is great, but not that great.
In 63, they went 10-4, missing the playoffs by one game. Its possible they might have made the playoffs with Davis. While Jim Brown did run for an NFL record 1800+ yards that year, there were still 150 non-Brown running attempts by the offense that year. So its quite possible Davis would be a difference maker this season.
In 64, they went 10-3-1 to win their division and then beat the Colts to win the Championship. Can’t do better than that.
In 65, they went 11-3 to again win their division. But they lost the Championship game to the Packers 23-12. It’s possible with Davis they could have won the Championship.
In 66, 24 year old Leroy Kelly was their primary running back, rushing for 1100+ yards at 5.5 yards an attempt and scoring 15 rushing touchdowns. The Browns went 9-5, finishing 1.5 games behind the Cowboys and not making the playoffs. The Browns had the number one rated rushing offense, and the 2nd overall offense that year. Hard to see Davis making enough of a difference to push the Browns to the Divisional title.
In 67 the NFL went to a four Division format, with the Browns winning their division. They were walloped 52 – 14 by the Cowboys in the 1st round of the playoffs. It’s possible with Davis they might have down better in the playoffs. (FYI, the Rams and Colts both went 11-1-2 playing in the same division that year, but the Colts didn’t make the playoffs)
In 68, they won their division, but lost to the Colts 34 – 0 in the Conference Championship game. The Colts were 13-1 that year (before losing to the Jets in Super Bowl 3). Hard to see Davis making that much of a difference, but it is possible he could have had a great playoff performance. Leroy Kelly ran for 1200+ years at a 5.0 yards per attempt pace with 16 rushing touchdowns for the Browns.
In 69, they again won their division, but lost in the Conference Championship game. This time to the Vikings by a score of 23-7. Leroy Kelly had an off year. Could Davis had made enough of an impact to get them into the Super Bowl?
In 70, the Browns go 7 and 7 and miss the playoffs by 1 game. The running game was only ranked 18th in the now 26 team merged NFL. In what would have been his 9th season, a healthy Ernie Davis would have been enough to push the Browns to win the Division over the Bengals.
In 71, the Browns return to winning the division championship with a 9-5 record, but they lose in the first round 20-3 to the Colts. The Browns rushing offense was even worse in 71, ranking only 20th. Ernie Dave would have significantly improved it. It’s possible they could have pushed further into the playoffs with Davis.
At this point Ernie Davis would have played 10 seasons in the NFL. He’s taken a lot of hits, and been injured (hopefully to validate this POD, none seriously). Not many running backs are still great after 10 seasons. His career length would have been helped by splitting the rushing duties for the first 4 years of his career with Jim Brown. I assume Jim Brown would still have retired when he did. I assume the Browns would still have drafted Leroy Kelly. He was an 8th round pick in 1964. He likely would have helped share some of the running load with Davis after Jim Brown retired. So maybe Davis is still pretty effective after 10 seasons and able to help the Browns win, but the likelihood of this is entering a grey area.
In the period 62 – 71, the Browns didn’t make the playoffs in 1962, 1963, 1966, 1970. With Davis they likely do make the playoffs in 63 and 70, and maybe in 1966. More difficult to guess how their playoff appearances might have improved. I see 1965 and 1969 as the most likely possibilities for them winning Championships.
Ultimately, the Browns already had a fantastic running game through this period. Davis was great, and he’d have helped improve the Brown’s legacy. But unless he in fact was the second coming of Jim Brown (which we’ll never know), I’m not sure he’d have been a mythical figure who’d have pushed the Browns to multiple consecutive championships.
You have a good point about 1969, and 1970 may have been a title team for the Browns as well if Davis is there and if he was what he should have been. After that, he would have been entering his 10th season, and it is hard to say how his career would have gone from then.
This thread goes much further than that. If Davis can help the Browns win a few more games in 1962, it's possible Modell doesn't fire Paul Brown. If Brown gets to stay at least four or five more years, that butterflies away the Cincinnati Bengals. The question now becomes, "Who else would have been the AFL's 10th franchise?"
Gretz signed with the WHA because the NHL wouldn't allow under 20's to be drafted at the time.
What if the NHL had changed it's draft rules so that Gretz could be drafted at 18?
The Colorado Rockies (they're known as the Devils these days) had the #1 overall pick in the '79 Draft.
Obvious questions: Would they keep the pick and draft Gretz, going into debt to secure a phenom guaranteed to fill seats and recoup the debt in about a year?
Would they trade the pick? Toronto would probably be willing to pay a pretty penny to secure the Brantford native? Would a team like the Rangers make a play to put The Great One in MSG on the biggest pro sports stage in the world?
Further, what if the Leafs or Rangers do manage to get their hands on Gretz?
What could that potentially mean for The Leafs? Would they have won a Cup during Gretz's stay? Would they have been a one man show and ended up trading him away eventually?
What about the Rags, or more to the point, what would the impact of the biggest phenom to hit the game ever, playing in New York, have meant for the popularity of the game in the U.S.?
Would Gretz dominating the sports pages of the New York papers and segments across the New York media (and within their considerable reach) have caused a boom in hockey interest in the U.S.?
Gretz going to the Rockies would have been interesting. If they take him and keep him, they may have stayed in the Mile High City if he would have put enough butts in the seats.
As for building a team around him, I noticed that the Rockies/Devils traded away their #1 picks from 1980-83. They traded the #1 overall pick in the 80 draft to Montreal in 1976, but with Gretzky, maybe they keep the #1's from 1981-83, where they could have chose people like Grant Fuhr, Ron Francis, Ken Daneyko, Dave Andreychuk, Steve Yzerman, and Cam Neely in the first round, and players like Chris Chelios and Claude Lemieux in the second.
Also, here are some more questions:
1. With Gretzky and Lemieux both in American markets four years earlier, would there have been more pressure on John Ziegler to get a major American TV contract for the NHL in the mid-to-late 80's?
2. How would that have affected future expansion with the Rockies staying in Denver, and with Gretzky possibly staying in Denver?
1. With Gretzky and Lemieux both in American markets four years earlier, would there have been more pressure on John Ziegler to get a major American TV contract for the NHL in the mid-to-late 80's?
2. How would that have affected future expansion with the Rockies staying in Denver, and with Gretzky possibly staying in Denver?
* What if Australian Rules Football had it's own rebel/breakaway competition? (would this have been feasible?) Say for instance if the AFL keeps knocking back Port Adelaide's expansion bid, and they enter negotiations with a Tasmanian consortium, a Freemantle syndicate, maybe some of the poorer Melbourne clubs to forge their own competition. is this even possible??
What if the AFL and NFL had never merged?
What if the Vikings don't come back to defeat the Giants in the 1997 Wild Card game?
I was watching something online about the Giants' worst moments since the 1987 strike, and they talked about how Dennis Green may have been fired if they would have lost that game.
If Green is fired, they may not have taken Randy Moss in the first round.
If they don't, who takes him? The Raiders? The Dolphins? or does he fall all the way to Denver at 32?
If that would have happened, I would have went crazy, and the Broncos might have won three or four in a row. Maybe Elway stays another year or two, and the short-lived Brian Griese era never happens.
There's a distinct possibility that Moss makes Griese a better QB just by being on the field with him and giving him a pair of sure hands to throw to even when he's off and an ever present threat that leaves other receivers open as Moss is double covered, giving Griese less pressure throws to make per game.
Griese wasn't a terrible QB, he just wasn't what everybody thought he was going to be. A wide out like Moss might just be one of those things that makes him either better than he really was OR helps him build up enough confidence to become a solid starting QB in his own right.
What if Cleveland wins a championship... Ever?