Speculating on a few questions here.
The effect of the Triple Intervention on Japanese foreign policy attitudes and approaches.
On the one hand, it pissed off the Japanese, they rebuilt for the next round, and humiliated the three intervenors in the coming decades (Russia 1904, Germany 1914 and France 1940)
On the other hand it probably made them cautious and aware of their weakness. Perhaps they would have been more reckless if they had managed keep all the gains they forced China to concede.
Also, would Russia have put the same demands on Japan to disgorge gains from China if she did not have two western powers backing her.
The effect of the Triple Intervention on Japanese foreign policy attitudes and approaches.
On the one hand, it pissed off the Japanese, they rebuilt for the next round, and humiliated the three intervenors in the coming decades (Russia 1904, Germany 1914 and France 1940)
On the other hand it probably made them cautious and aware of their weakness. Perhaps they would have been more reckless if they had managed keep all the gains they forced China to concede.
Also, would Russia have put the same demands on Japan to disgorge gains from China if she did not have two western powers backing her.