Simple enough. Is there a way to have Spanish Explorers discover Hawaii before Cook?
- explorer finds island, explorer claims island for home country, explorer names island, explorer sails off and island is forgotten for another 50-100 years before a different country comes along and claims it.
That's my take, anyway.
Hawai is quite isolated. The spanish navegation paths went southeast from the Philipinnes to the Maguellan straits. It was not until the US settled the west coast than Hawai became strategically important, so if the Spanish managed to settle California -or even build the Nicaragua channel, they would pay a lot of attention to Hawai
The Spaniards must colonize the California area first before Hawaii. If the Spaniards colonizes California, for sure, the Spaniards would go to Hawaii to make as stopover between California and the Philippines.
Hawaii would have been a vital port since the galleons could replenish their water and supplies. Had the Spanish moved their Pacific coast operations to either San Diego or Monterey Bay there is a greater chance that the islands would have been sighted by galleon captains. It is known that the settlement of Monterey, California, was put off by the Spanish by about 100 years - which is an entirely different WI.
I don't mean to derail the thread, but why was this?
Interesting to speculate how a Spanish Hawaii would have evolved. I's reasonable to imagine the Hawaiian monarchy would have been supplanted by Spanish colonial administration of some kind, and local cultures sublimated into some sort of mixed spanish-native catholic hodge-podge like the Phillipines. Spanish ownership of Hawaii may have continued into the late 1800's. If we don't butterfly away the Spanish-American War, it would be very reasonable to assume the US would seize the islands. I suspect might would not lead to a statehood track, because there would not be the local anglo planters to form a ready-made american political elite. Rather, Hawaii might be treated as an essentially much more "foreign" place more like Cuba, the Phillipines, or Guam - some sort of protectorate with permanent leases on Pearl Harbor, perhap ultimately independence or permanent territorial status.
Interesting to speculate how a Spanish Hawaii would have evolved. I's reasonable to imagine the Hawaiian monarchy would have been supplanted by Spanish colonial administration of some kind, and local cultures sublimated into some sort of mixed spanish-native catholic hodge-podge like the Phillipines. Spanish ownership of Hawaii may have continued into the late 1800's. If we don't butterfly away the Spanish-American War, it would be very reasonable to assume the US would seize the islands. I suspect might would not lead to a statehood track, because there would not be the local anglo planters to form a ready-made american political elite. Rather, Hawaii might be treated as an essentially much more "foreign" place more like Cuba, the Phillipines, or Guam - some sort of protectorate with permanent leases on Pearl Harbor, perhap ultimately independence or permanent territorial status.