C: Plausible, Germany and USSR come to some form of agreement, PolishSSr keeps Posen because too many Poles there.
D: Plausible, agreement to get back to pre war borders.
E: Implausible, it would mean resuming WW1 in the West as well.
F: Implausbile, above.
Also plausibe, the Soviets lose at Warsaw but the war effort does not completely collapse and they settle on somethin along what they started at.@anotherlurker see Map K., how does its plausibility compare with the others?
View attachment 404212
The French dont get a say in there, it's basically the Soviets gifting the Germans the pre war border in exchange for better relations, an earlier communism in one country doctrine.Is E. implausible in your view because the French could plausibly tolerate Germany annexing the corridor, or restoring the German 1914 border, but going beyond the 1914 (to get the whole Prussian zone of partition from 1793) is just too much to tolerate and France would attack Germany?
Why would map F., which is a capitalist Poland west of the Vistula and a Communist Poland east of the Vistula, with no German expansion, cause a resumed WW1 in the west?
Also plausibe, the Soviets lose at Warsaw but the war effort does not completely collapse and they settle on somethin along what they started at.
Did you change the posts? I swear all the pictures were in one single post...I'm not sure you get that all the Polands in A,B,C,D,E,G,K, illustrated in a shade of red, are supposed to be Communist states. So none of them would be type of Poland that defeats the Soviets at Warsaw.
It would only be in maps H, I and J that the nationalist Poles would have won at Warsaw and consider themselves a victor at all in the war.
With that clarified, does that move them all to implausible in your opinion.
Did you have to make multiple posts?
I apologize if i got something wrong.
I did not. I was mistaken. I'm sorry. Don't hate me.