I think there is a decent chance successor leadership would try to have good relations with Tito, and would see a good relationship with him as an asset within Soviet politics.
This could possible extend to endorsing the proposed Yugoslav-Bulgarian union (which may well take in Albania too).
Under these circumstances, would Tito continue backing the Greek insurgency, or ultimately quit it?
On the one hand the post-Stalin Soviet leaders might seek to minimize confrontation with the west, on the other hand they may be reluctant to firmly tell Tito to change his policy and shut down the war.
This could possible extend to endorsing the proposed Yugoslav-Bulgarian union (which may well take in Albania too).
Under these circumstances, would Tito continue backing the Greek insurgency, or ultimately quit it?
On the one hand the post-Stalin Soviet leaders might seek to minimize confrontation with the west, on the other hand they may be reluctant to firmly tell Tito to change his policy and shut down the war.