Soviet APC in WW2?

Would it have been possible to convert T-34s, T-70s, or other tanks to APCs in a similar fashion to the Kangaroo? Would the conversion make sense given the physical limitations, or the institutional culture? It seems that Soviet tank brigades were quite lacking in infantry a lot of the time so such a move might have facilitated better combined arms.
 
It seems that the Soviets prioritized tanks over trucks or other supply vehicles during the war (or couldn't set more production facilities for them).
I think that there is a more straightforwards conversion/basis than tanks themselves. The SU-76 SPG already features a front mounted (or two?) engine with the driver at the front.
Remove the superfluous ammo and gun, extend the superstructure as much as possible, maybe add some form of armored roof, crude seats and maybe a simple hatch with a pintle for a MG and you get a very simple APC, although it probably won't carry many people.

A more durable design would be a stretched SU-76 with one or two extra roadwheels (maybe not necessary), a reinforced suspension, a stronger engine, revised driver's compartment and more space for a full 7-10-man squad. The Romanians designed an APC on the SU-76, called the MLVM.

Note that in 1944 or so the US started development of an APC based on the M24 Chaffee.
 
...
A more durable design would be a stretched SU-76 with one or two extra roadwheels (maybe not necessary), a reinforced suspension, a stronger engine, revised driver's compartment and more space for a full 7-10-man squad. The Romanians designed an APC on the SU-76, called the MLVM.

So did the Yugoslavs - OT M-60.
 
Like with any hypothetical WWII APC/IFV, they're technically possible, but are also an instance of trying to run before walking.
 
Take one of the Soviet amphib tankettes like the T-27, T-37, T-38, or T-40 and convert them into APCs.
They would work fine.
 
British manufactured 30 APCs in ww1, so the 'walking' part was already there.

The "Female tanks" the Brits used had no suspension. You'd be lucky if the infantrymen inside could walk after taking a ride across no mans land.

My thought is maybe go with modifying a BT5/BT7. Replace the turret with a APC cabin arrangement. Might be easier to just have lightly armored sides but go with a open roof like a lot of the German APCs/Half Tracks.
 
Why? The Soviet Army developed the concept of Tank Riders where infantry rode on the Tanks. There would have been a reluctance to take assembly lines out of tank production to build them. The numbers required would have been huge even if only 'shock' units received them.
Even in the Western Allies Kangaroos were not that common. The U.S. used halftracks as the primary APC for the Armored Infantry Battalions.
 
My thought is maybe go with modifying a BT5/BT7. Replace the turret with a APC cabin arrangement. Might be easier to just have lightly armored sides but go with a open roof like a lot of the German APCs/Half Tracks.
The BTs were pretty much used up in the early part of the war. There weren't many left by the time the Soviets went on the offensive
 
As with many things, if you build A.P.C's something else doesn't get built.
Did the Soviets have spare capacity or would they rather have more T-34 and let the pbi ride on the tank?
 
Could it be that nobody was worried about overhead protection during WWII? Artillery with proximity fuses wasn’t used until the Bulge in 1944. Half tracks would have been fine before proximity shells.
 
The Soviets needed every tank they made for most of the war. However, I'm pretty sure the BA series of armoured "cars" was pulled from frontline service in 1942. Strip out the turret and bam! An armoured truck for all your mechanized infantry needs!

iirc they could even bee field modified into half tracks for the muddy season.
 
Last edited:

Deleted member 1487

Would it have been possible to convert T-34s, T-70s, or other tanks to APCs in a similar fashion to the Kangaroo? Would the conversion make sense given the physical limitations, or the institutional culture? It seems that Soviet tank brigades were quite lacking in infantry a lot of the time so such a move might have facilitated better combined arms.
They had APCs. T-34s, APC with turret and gun.
wwii0173.jpg
 

marathag

Banned
As with many things, if you build A.P.C's something else doesn't get built.
Did the Soviets have spare capacity or would they rather have more T-34 and let the pbi ride on the tank?
But they did build a lot in the 1930s
Light Tanks
1585954175362.png

1585954226730.png
 
1) tank riders don’t solve the problem. Cavalry solved the problem
2) the USSR had excess budget equivalent 1932-1940: this is the time to play around with mg and splinter proof infantry transport
 
Top