They have no way to mount it in a turret at this point, nor a tank design large enough to take it.Their Type 88 75mm AAA gun was good enough, but was similar in weight to the US 3" gun
They have no way to mount it in a turret at this point, nor a tank design large enough to take it.Their Type 88 75mm AAA gun was good enough, but was similar in weight to the US 3" gun
Yeah that doesn't happen until the Type 3 which even if built will probably be held back for homeland defence as it was OTL. The type 4 and 5 designs could probably also stand against the allies but those never got beyond prototype stage.They have no way to mount it in a turret at this point, nor a tank design large enough to take it.
I had to look that one up, never heard that one before. Learned something new.The First practical HEAT weapons were developed by the British in 39 - the No 68 AT Grenade which could pen 2" and the Germans using Shaped Charge Warheads on the Eban Emael fort in 1940 and started introducing HEAT rounds (as you say) for their 75mm/24 on the early PZ4 and STUG.
The Japanese did have HEAT rounds for their 70mm type 92 battalion gun/howitzer from 44 but apparently it was a bit pants.
They were working on it, slowly, the Type 4They have no way to mount it in a turret at this point, nor a tank design large enough to take it.
The Types 3, 4 and 5 were responses to the Sherman.They were worki
They were working on it, slowly, the Type 4
View attachment 683924
This would have been an awesome tank in 1942
1945, not so much
Like I said to little to late.. Japan would have to decide in 1938 at the latest that they might be facing something Panzer IV grade or stronger and need to start developing a counter there and then. Instead OTL happen and unless your Oarai's tankery team beating the allies tanks just isn't happening. (Even then they mostly relied on non-Japanese tanks).The Types 3, 4 and 5 were responses to the Sherman.
Well they might not do better, But I suspect something equivaltent to the Type 3 will come out a little bit sooner this time around. Not that it will do them any good mind, by the time their Type 3 is out, the British will have the Victor in production.Like I said to little to late.. Japan would have to decide in 1938 at the latest that they might be facing something Panzer IV grade or stronger and need to start developing a counter there and then. Instead OTL happen and unless your Oarai's tankery team beating the allies tanks just isn't happening. (Even then they mostly relied on non-Japanese tanks).
Seconding this. Given the pace of WWII-era Tank/Tank Gun development, the best time to start designing your next Tank/Tank Gun is once you're back from the long weekend you took to celebrate finishing the design work on your current tank.Like I said to little to late..
Red queen syndrome, can't catch up no matter how fast they run. Also the 3 is unlikely to appear before late 1943 even working at warp 8. By then any major combat that tanks are much use for (not holding tiny islands) will be over so as OTL they'll probably keep most for home defense with perhaps a few to Manchuria.Well they might not do better, But I suspect something equivaltent to the Type 3 will come out a little bit sooner this time around. Not that it will do them any good mind, by the time their Type 3 is out, the British will have the Victor in production.
Speaking of, with much less demand for the M3 Grant, will we see the Sherman sooner ITTL do you think?Seconding this. Given the pace of WWII-era Tank/Tank Gun development, the best time to start designing your next Tank/Tank Gun is once you're back from the long weekend you took to celebrate finishing the design work on your current tank.
Waiting until you've encountered a Sherman to start designing your Sherman counter is far, far too late.
Changes aren't that involved and if they not building to many M3's I guess they can tool up quicker?Speaking of, with much less demand for the M3 Grant, will we see the Sherman sooner ITTL do you think?
I think so, ITTL the M3 Lee/Grant would be built in smaller numbers, as a true interim, not thousands made and LL'ed to the Brits and SovietsSpeaking of, with much less demand for the M3 Grant, will we see the Sherman sooner ITTL do you think?
I think so, ITTL the M3 Lee/Grant would be built in smaller numbers, as a true interim, not thousands made and LL'ed to the Brits and Soviets
OTL the British were unhappy with the M3 Lee, and were able to talk the US into the minor mod of the Grant, and get the Canadians to us the M3 Hull, and do the Ram
View attachment 683943 with the 2 pdr in June, 1941, with the first production Grants in mid July, 1941
Without being so tank desperate, they may demand something Ram like from US Factories
I don't see this TL being any different in the British desiring the M3 Stuart, possible with different turret, but minor changes vs the redo demanded for the M3 Medium
Unless due to Sir John Valentine surviving the cooling problems of the Mk VII Tetrarch light tank have been avoided. Now of course Sir John can't over see every vehicle Vickers produces but his presence does free up other designers to do the job.The Stuart with a 2pdr however could well be a thing. That is one area Britain is still lacking
It was still an 8 ton tank with 14mm armor on the front, 2pdr and a BESAthe cooling problems of the Mk VII Tetrarch light tank have been avoided
Easily upgraded to the 38mm of the Mk VIII Harry Hopkins light tank. Light tanks aren't meant to fight anyway, their job is scouting and the Vickers Mk VII and Mk VIII are a lot easier to hide being much shorter than the Honey.It was still an 8 ton tank with 14mm armor on the front, 2pdr and a BESA
Stuart was 16 tons, with 50mm armor on the front, and 3 .30s
The M3's will be very popular out east, of that I have no doubt. The issue is that the Far East will very definitely be considered secondary so no matter how many favourable reports get sent back about them they won't be given the same weight as reports from Europe.Later in WW2 an armoured force was stood up in Tito’s partisan force comprising Stuart tanks and AEC Armoured Cars.
The M3s were used for infantry support while the AEC with its 6 pounder was used to bully the local beutepanzer such as T34s and the like.
I can see the Lees and Stuart’s still being appreciated ITTL with the Lee being used more like a STUG.
The 100 or so Stuart’s that arrived in Rangoon just after the defeat of the 17th Indian Division pretty much prevented disaster as they were powerful enough to defeat roadblocks and the Japanese struggled to handle them with the light weapons on hand.
Had they arrived a month earlier!