Derek Pullem
Donor
I'd settle for an alt-CometPossibly, and of course final timing will be up to Allan, but I'd rather be too pessimistic than assume "oh yes, we'll have Centurions by D-day". (Exaggeration for comic effect )
I'd settle for an alt-CometPossibly, and of course final timing will be up to Allan, but I'd rather be too pessimistic than assume "oh yes, we'll have Centurions by D-day". (Exaggeration for comic effect )
That would help the British out a lot. Not having to rush resources to a conflict area while they're still rearming (no matter what, a lot of materiel will be lost in France, the only question is whether there's going to be a panic over it, or whether they feel secure enough to not go "we need something NOW", or whether they're content to wait for better kit in the near future) will make things a lot easier.It's unlikely but there is a slight chance that the BEF doing better persuades Mussolini to stay neutral, or that the Fascist council overrules him.
Also, more men recovered. The numbers stack even more favourably if it's Calais they retain rather than Dunkirk, as there's the possibility of getting out at least a portion of the vehicles and equipment (someone mentioned that Calais has a Train Ferry capability, which should allow at least a number of unneeded soft-skinned vehicles to be removed without too much issue, excepting enemy action).Cynically
If you are writing off france
Every day that the French fight longer is
A small number of extra Germans killed our wounded
A small amount of German equipment destroyed, damaged or worn out
A larger amount of French equipment captured intact IOTL is instead destroyed, damaged or worn out and thus not available to by used by the Germans later in the war
I'd settle for an alt-Comet
Agreed. BTW, does anyone have any stats for the 3" HV?Now THAT I think is not unreasonable - a "heavy cruiser" by Vickers with a HV 3" gun. And improved fusing for the HE shell.
Irritatingly no sources but sounds reasonable.Agreed. BTW, does anyone have any stats for the 3" HV?
You're not getting to keep much weaponry, sure, but you're likely to get back soft-skinned vehicles, carriers, maybe even some light tanks (they wouldn't be much use in defence). Plus, you're getting back at least some of the (to quote wikipedia):Given Calais and some extra days before the LW get its act together, they can pull out a lot of the support troops and some of the more valuable kit that wont be needed for defence. Calais can take ships. The RAF can defend it better - its closer - so while eventually the LW and artillery will degrade the port, but these things take time, and they can still pull out a lot of men at night.
Actually I don't see too much of kit like artillery, AA guns or tanks coming back, these will be in the front line. But with troops embarking from a port, the light and personal weapons will come back, which will be a big help in reducing panic about an invasion. A more deliberate evacuation will also mean left-behind kit is properly wrecked, so much less for the germans to aquire.
Actually a defence of the port, even if, as would be expected, it doesn't last too long - its basically doomed when France surrenders - will givethe British more confidence they can handle any invasion that happens.
That will help immensely.
Well if Carden can design a tank to take that gun somewhat earlier than the Comet (which shouldn't be that difficult to pull off, since Carden is thinking ahead already), then they might be ready in time for D-Day, which will give the Germans a rather nasty surprise.Irritatingly no sources but sounds reasonable.
Vickers 75Mm L/50 High Velocity Tank Gun Of Ww2
I recently assembled some information which was new to me about this obscure gun, so I thought it might be of interest to Tanknetters: Vickers proposed the 75mm L/50 High Velocity tank gun early in 1942 as a replacement for the 6 pdr (57mm) gun. It was intended to be used in the Cromwell tank and...www.tanknet.org
Irritatingly no sources but sounds reasonable.
Vickers 75Mm L/50 High Velocity Tank Gun Of Ww2
I recently assembled some information which was new to me about this obscure gun, so I thought it might be of interest to Tanknetters: Vickers proposed the 75mm L/50 High Velocity tank gun early in 1942 as a replacement for the 6 pdr (57mm) gun. It was intended to be used in the Cromwell tank and...www.tanknet.org
The post it's mentioned in says that Carden is looking at a weapon with a muzzle velocity somewhere in the region of 2,000-2,500 ft/s, a little lower than the 2,580 ft/s of the 77mm. Not quite as good a hole-puncher (directly at least, though a shaped charge or APDS could help), but likely with a more respectable HE round.The gun in question is a new design for TTL. Its not entered production or even full development yet. I was assuming similar performance to the 77mm HV. That article would seem to confirm that as the rough ballpark for the gun.
The post was in response to MattII's question.The gun in question is a new design for TTL. Its not entered production or even full development yet. I was assuming similar performance to the 77mm HV. That article would seem to confirm that as the rough ballpark for the gun.
They had a number of "assault tank" designs similar to the Churchill. Personally, I like the Excelsior. Similar armour to the Churchill but larger gun and faster. I think it had the Merritt-Brown gearbox as well, so climbing ability should be pretty good as wellIdeally the British end up with a Valiant 1 / II line which ends up competing with the Pz IVH and Panthers of this world and a Churchill tank which ends up meeting the same role as the StuG
But how could America make the show "Rat Patrol" and claim they won the North African Campaign then?It's unlikely but there is a slight chance that the BEF doing better persuades Mussolini to stay neutral, or that the Fascist council overrules him.
It's Hollywood, they'll think of something. If history gets in the way of a story they'll make something up. How else do they have American volunteers winning the Battle of Britain before fighting at Pearl Harbour and taking part in the Doolittle Raid?But how could America make the show "Rat Patrol" and claim they won the North African Campaign then?
1: Mussolini doesn't declare on France but prepares for an invasion of Yugoslavia/Grece.It's Hollywood, they'll think of something. If history gets in the way of a story they'll make something up. How else do they have American volunteers winning the Battle of Britain before fighting at Pearl Harbour and taking part in the Doolittle Raid?
Then Errol Flynn saves Burma!1: Mussolini doesn't declare on France but prepares for an invasion of Yugoslavia/Grece.
2: Brits, having guaranteed Grece, declare on Italy when they invade
3: Brits are now fighting in NA and Grece
4: Hollywood profits