marathag
Banned
Too complex.Hm, could you tell Vulcan to shift production of the Matilda II to Australia?
Unless you pull a USSR and uproot the factory and the Workers to Oz.
Too complex.Hm, could you tell Vulcan to shift production of the Matilda II to Australia?
So just sending the machine tools and instructors wouldn't be enough? Pity.Too complex.
Unless you pull a USSR and uproot the factory and the Workers to Oz.
They could but why? The 6pdr is about the same so why take the extra time and what do you do with the extra 6pdrs?The Sowjets might be able to mount their 57 mm anti-tank gun M1943 (production OTL began on 1 June 1941, but was stopped 1 December 1941 until June 1943 due to concerns of overpenetration shots on German tanks) in place of the 6-pounder the upgraded version of the Valiant would field (both guns are fairly close in size to each other).
Mainly because the gun and it's ammunition can be produced locally (in Russia) without anything being imported from either the UK or US and I doubt the brits would ship the Sowjets the new 6-pounder version of the Valiant but rather the older version with the smaller (older) gun. So the Sowjets designing and building a turret for their own gun might make sense.They could but why? The 6pdr is about the same so why take the extra time and what do you do with the extra 6pdrs?
The 75mm might make tactical sense but again what do you do with the 6pdrs?
In OTL Russia just used Matilda II with the 2pdr so I see no reason they would do any regunning here.Mainly because the gun and it's ammunition can be produced locally (in Russia) without anything being imported from either the UK or US and I doubt the brits would ship the Sowjets the new 6-pounder version of the Valiant but rather the older version with the smaller (older) gun. So the Sowjets designing and building a turret for their own gun might make sense.
and the more interestingBetween 1941 and 1943, some 1084 Matildas were shipped to the Soviet Union. Only 918 were received by the Red Army, however, as the others likely never made it to the end of the Arctic Convoys as a result of German Attacks. The Soviets received one-third of the entire 2987 vehicle production run of the Matilda.
At the time, the Matilda and the Valentine were considered to be light tanks and actually fell in between the Soviet definition of Light and Medium tanks.
It depends what's available. I think a lot of the 2-pounder Valiants have already been deployed, meaning that it's likely there's only 6-pounder Valiants to send.Mainly because the gun and it's ammunition can be produced locally (in Russia) without anything being imported from either the UK or US and I doubt the brits would ship the Sowjets the new 6-pounder version of the Valiant but rather the older version with the smaller (older) gun. So the Sowjets designing and building a turret for their own gun might make sense.
An interesting article about Valentines in Russia here - https://thedailybounce.net/historical/valentine-ix-a-tank-destroyer-with-claws/At the time, the Matilda and the Valentine were considered to be light tanks and actually fell in between the Soviet definition of Light and Medium tanks.
Agreed. Another consideration is the space available. America has large amounts of open areas that they can build large-scale tank factories on, while it is a lot harder to do the same in Britain, while also having access to the workforce needed.I dont think a single tank factory in the UK would be such a good idea for a number of reasons.
A single factory, if bombed, would stop tank production (come to that, so would a strike!).
Tanks and their components are big, heavy things; you cant easily build or modify the infrastructure outside of the factory to expand this.
The idea is good, but I would suggest having, say, 3 locations and sending the components there. A little more complex to organise supply, but it would just be setting up the assembly lines in more that one place, a single megafactory would have multiple assembly lines anyway. As long as the supply situation is handled well, it would be as efficient as a single factory
Build it near Blackpool, then a resort area.Agreed. Another consideration is the space available. America has large amounts of open areas that they can build large-scale tank factories on, while it is a lot harder to do the same in Britain, while also having access to the workforce needed.
And also, as Astro points out, if bombed, production would be significantly reduced/stopped altogether, and it is a lot easier to bomb a factory in Britain than it is in America
[Immediately imagines visiting Blackpool Tower and Blackpool Tank Museum in one trip]Build it near Blackpool, then a resort area.
That's why Bkackpool is ideal, facilities for large number of visitors.My thinking is, a huge tank plant actually has multiple assembly lines, so as long as the total number of lines is the same, so is the production. Its little more complicated moving the components around, but not terrible. Also. a limiting factor would be the houseing available for the workers - at this point in time, it was usually supplied by the local councils. And there probably isnt a huge amount of free space to buld housing, unlike the USA.
But how will you fit the tank production lines in the Tower??That's why Bkackpool is ideal, facilities for large number of visitors.
I believe at the time, could host a quarter million vacationers.
Vertically.But how will you fit the tank production lines in the Tower??
Feed components in at the top & tanks drive out at the bottom.Vertically.
They never bombed Blackpool. I don't know why, but no known military targets might be a decisive factor. Worth putting a grass roof garden on your factory? The spans should be wide enough to allow assembly of 60ft wingspan aircraft (twin engine fighters, Mosquitoes) if need be. A Royal Ordinance Factory shouldn't be too specialised. It might end up building tank landing craft.Build it near Blackpool, then a resort area.
Well served with railroad access, just the thing for a US style Detroit Tank Arsenal to serve as a final assembly point, and it's far from German bombers
A new take on Vertical IntegrationFeed components in at the top & tanks drive out at the bottom.
😋