Yeah, sure. But I admit I have no idea how long sub patrols were in the early days. What I am trying to put forward is the views at the time. With 20-20 hindsight, we all know what should have happened. But how many sub patrols by the newer subs, (and I don't recall any of them being in the Philippines at the time. I am probably wrong on this), carry out ITTL at this stage.Thing is the S-boats could only use the Mark X ( the Mark 14 was 4 feet longer so did not fit the older tubes), so if the S-boats are not having a problem, foreign subs are not having a problem, but the newer US subs are, suspicion will go on the Mark XIV torpedo rather quickly as its the obvious difference. Now getting higher ups to fight through the political protection may take a while but the skippers at the front will start taking measures sooner ( setting torpedoes to run high, switching off magnetic and attacking from the rear ).
That would be all well and good, but for the witness testimony of the British and Dutch captains. Plus, even if they can't re-arm in Surabaya, they can at least top up their tanks, which ought to give the captains enough time to write a few reports.Yeah, sure. But I admit I have no idea how long sub patrols were in the early days. What I am trying to put forward is the views at the time. With 20-20 hindsight, we all know what should have happened. But how many sub patrols by the newer subs, (and I don't recall any of them being in the Philippines at the time. I am probably wrong on this), carry out ITTL at this stage.
The main USN Sub base would by now be Pearl. What is the transit time from Pearl to the patrol zones, how long were they expected to remain on station and then how long back to Pearl? A month, two?
Then write up AARs, where a number of apparent misfires, failed firing solutions, etc are highlighted? Then allow the HQs to do the OTL thing of accusing the sub captains of not pressing attacks hard enough, inexperience using equipment, stress under operational conditions leading to poor tactical decisions. etc. So refuel, rearm, resupply and out on another patrol.
Having worked with Defence Bureaucrats in the past, an immediate realisation that there must be something wrong with the equipment is not the immediate answer.
So what I am trying to say is that it will inevitably take a couple of sub patrols by the newer subs before someone smells a rat, even if it is merely the sub commanders. After all, not every firing solution works. The target can change course, change speed, etc that will negate even the best firing solution. So how long are the patrols and how many of them are needed before the penny drops? This could take quite a few months before anyone connects the dots that we know.
As well as talk with their weps and torp techs as well as their British and Dutch counterparts.That would be all well and good, but for the witness testimony of the British and Dutch captains. Plus, even if they can't re-arm in Surabaya, they can at least top up their tanks, which ought to give the captains enough time to write a few reports.
How much of that is there in-theatre (inc India & Australia to be reasonable) that isn't in short supply & not needed for immediate Commonwealth use?Apart from 30-06, and 37mm which are in the British supply lines.
probably my fault that I am not explaining my thoughts clearly.That would be all well and good, but for the witness testimony of the British and Dutch captains. Plus, even if they can't re-arm in Surabaya, they can at least top up their tanks, which ought to give the captains enough time to write a few reports.
Do remember though, they only have to return to PH to replenish their torpedoes, most other supplies can be sourced more locally.probably my fault that I am not explaining my thoughts clearly.
If the new subs have to use Pearl as their base, because all the spares and Mk XIV torpedoes etc are there and not blown up at Cavite, then how long would it take for a Sub to transit to the war zones, assume off Northern Luzon, spend time on station and then transit back to Pearl? The new S Class, the named ones like Skipjack, could do a max of 21 kts, but no-one wastes fuel that way, so say a cruising speed on the surface of 12 kts. My calculator tells me that at 12 kts from Honolulu to Manila would take 16 1/2 days. So even just getting there and back would take a month. Allow say four weeks on station? Is that reasonable? So even if the first Sub left Pearl on 8 Dec sailed at cruising speed to off Manila and then spent four weeks on station, that sub would take two months to get back to Pearl. That means the first subs reporting in that there was something wrong with the firing solutions would be getting back about early February.
perhaps the first skippers thought something was wrong with the fire computer, or whatever. After all, they had been told that their torpedoes were the best in the world. It would only be after a few more patrols that they would seriously start doubting the torpedoes.
And since the smaller boats with Mk X torpedoes would probably be operating from Singapore or Surabaya, rather than Pearl, the chances of a new sub skipper fronting the wardroom bar in Singapore only to hear from the RN and Dutch about how their own subs were doing so well and also hear from their own smaller boat captains how well they were doing are pretty small.
I reckon it will be about mid year before they start to smell a rat. They need a few more patrols to be able to build a case. First patrol finished Early Feb, next Patrol returns late April and by now the skippers laying over in Pearl while being resupplied etc will start realising they are all having the same problems. Next step is how to figure out what is wrong. Is it the firing solutions, are they overlooking a small but vital step in their attack profiles, or could it be, no, surely not, those magnificent torpedoes that are the best Uncle Sam could buy?
In certain regards they were not connected to reality at all, defeat was impossible therefore reports were read in a very slanted way, same with formulating conclusions. If all they could do is send 2 divisions, then 2 divisions must be more than enough. It does highlight just how lucky they got OTL with only slight delays just destroying them when you do a what if.I do wonder if the Imperial General HQ's intake of lead paint is sufficient to actually think this is a good idea?
From what I know of the IJA it accords well of how they tended to view situation. Japan has this strange mix of conservatism and rapid modernisation when it comes to their military which effects their mindset and modes of thought.I do wonder if the Imperial General HQ's intake of lead paint is sufficient to actually think this is a good idea?
What's the odds they can only ship 1 regiment at a time?
To top up on food and fuel.If you cannot get torpedoes, why are you there?
You mean good food right?To top up on food and fuel.
Well, food appropriate for use in submarines.You mean good food right?
So anything above Soylent Green.Well, food appropriate for use in submarines.