Okay, so it's something of a well-discussed point here that Japan got really lucky to do as well as it did in the Pacific, and there's innumerable things which all could have "taken months off the war"--submarine torpedoes which worked, forces deployed to Wake or the like which could have enabled those islands to hold at least temporarily, slightly better luck in early battles (carrier and surface) which might have seen more of Japan's prewar fleet destroyed earlier when it was still committed all over the Pacific. But...where's the actual minimum length of the war?
Is it possible to achieve victory on only forces available before the period in 1943 when the Americans start seeing the benefits of the Two Ocean Act in massive numbers? Is it possible to assemble the necessary mass of force for an invasion or bombing campaign before the A-bomb is developed? Or does it just turn into a stalemate on Japan's doorstep where the US can't push to victory, but Japan isn't willing to throw in the towel?
Is it possible to achieve victory on only forces available before the period in 1943 when the Americans start seeing the benefits of the Two Ocean Act in massive numbers? Is it possible to assemble the necessary mass of force for an invasion or bombing campaign before the A-bomb is developed? Or does it just turn into a stalemate on Japan's doorstep where the US can't push to victory, but Japan isn't willing to throw in the towel?