Shorter Argentinean civil war

The United Argentinean Provinces in 1830

Very nice Juan!

I wonder if Brazil will keep the monarchy ITTL now that Pedro is dead. Also, now his brother Miguel will have can more easily become king of Portugal (although I don't know if you want do develop this TL in Europe too or just keep the focus on South America).

Agreed! We want maps!:p
I was thinking in an earlier regency. Although I've been also liking the idea of Brazil turning into a constitutional monarchy as a compromise solution, but it seems an unlikely outcome.
Regarding Portugal, yes, Pedro's death will have butterflies there. But since my knowledge of Portugese history is close to nothing, I have no idea on how to elaborate.

Enough bloodshed for the time being. For now, a boring update on this ATL Argentina's economy and politics, and a few things I've been thinking.
*I've been calling OTL Uruguay, ATL province of "Banda Oriental" with the translated name ("Eastern Bank"), but I'm having second thoughts about sticking with the Spanish name instead. Province names, unlike countries, are seldom translated and, besides, "Eastern Bank" sounds weird.
*Previously I've written that the new constitution declares the vote universal, secret and mandatory for men. However, IITL there is no reason whatsoever to make it mandatory, so it would really follow the American way and be universal and secret (at least in theory), but optional.
*As immigration wasn't a political issue in the 1820's as it was by the 1840's and 50's, there is no article nor anything in the 1829 constitution about it. However, that won't stop the different governments from encouraging it. BTW, which nationalities are likely to inmigrate in this timeframe, other than Irish and Spanish? I guess Russians might show up, but I'm not sure
*Without a civil war and with two ports this ATL Argentina will evolve without that much of rivalry between the provinces and the city of Buenos Aires and, at least some sociologists claim, less pronounced divisions along political lines. That won't mean more political stability by itself, but it would mean less hatred for those who have a different ideology. In other words, strong divisions such as those facing peronist and anti-peronist (and that was one of the many OTL divisions) would be less likely and less extreme. In OTL Argentina's national identity was born in the middle of a long civil war, which is not the case ITTL
*With the non violent downfall of the Unitarian party (and the commercial and intellectual elite) in importance but, at the same time, a more democratic country where the opposition doesn't need to go to exile or be brutally repressed(as long as they don't try to shoot governors, that's it) and can present to elections - and be discredited - I think a slightly less europhile elite - or at least mentality - might form. Plus, they won't be wishing for the illuminated european inmigrants for decades, they'll see them soon enough. And they won't like them. That of course, would have pros and cons. Plus, with more political stability and less need to fight Rosas' dictatorship (as there isn't one), upcoming events would have a more lasting cultural impact.
*Tango is, of course, butteflied away. Local musics, however, might mix with Irish music as well as some others. The results of that are far beyond my imagination.
Anyway. Here comes the bloodless update and MAPS! (Well, one map really). I'll see if I can add the next update sooner, but exams have a way of demanding priority (and I have a way of hating them for that)

The United Argentinean Provinces in 1830

The decade of 1830 begun, then, with the presidency of Manuel Dorrego which begun with too many expectations but was ultimately somewhat controversial and was seen, more than a century after its end, with a negative light by some revisionist historians. It has to be understood the shaky foundations that marked the second president of the United Argentinean Provinces. Dorrego has ascended to power in the province of Buenos Aires with the support of a few powerful and rich landowners as Juan Manuel de Rosas and, specially, the support of the lower classes, the so called “descamisados”. This had already discredited him in many circles of the dominating Buenos Aires’ business class, who saw the “descamisados” with disdain. To add further conflict with that group, by mid-1830 begun the trials against those involved in the “Unitarian conspiracy” which attempted to co-opt high ranking officers of the army to launch a revolution against the, by then, governor Dorrego. Many rich and respected businessmen and politicians, as well as a fair number of condecorated officers were found guilty. Generals Lavalle, Paz and Olazabal were convicted, and notorious politicians like Martin Rodriguez, Salvador Maria del Carril and Valentín Alsina along with many other less renown Unitarians were also found guilty. Prison sentences weren’t that hard, averaging between 5 and 10 years at most, but they were enough to enrage many upper-class citizens. Luckily for Dorrego Rivadavia and Alvear had left the country and the Unitarian party was barely trying to keep afloat and find a new leadership (and fighting among themselves for that last reason). The second power group that would mark the country in the decades to come were the Eastern businessmen, commercial rivals (although sometimes partners) of those from Buenos Aires. They didn’t trust Buenos Aires’ commercial elite and, that way, they could have become important supporters of Dorrego. However, by 1830 their province was still trying to recover from the war and their only political asset was a fair number of representatives in the Congress, number that might change once the 1831 census was done. That, however, proved crucial in those early years. Dorrego’s most important support came from the third power group. That one was the heterogeneous combination of the center and western provinces’ caudillos: those of Mendoza, San Juan, San Luis, Catamarca, Tucuman, Salta, Jujuy, Santiago del Estero, reluctantly Cordoba, all loosely led by Facundo Quiroga, the caudillo from La Rioja. This group, contemptuously nicknamed “The ten ranches” by rich porteños, was the weaker of the three and only held more or less together precisely for that reason. Those provinces were sparsely populated and held little economic activity, in contrast with the other five: Buenos Aires, the Eastern Bank, Santa Fe, Entre Ríos and Corrientes. The governors from the those last three provinces didn’t really ally with anyone and just kept following whoever suited their business best.
The Argentinean economy, with the exception of the Eastern Bank, recovered somewhat fast from the war andwas flourishing in some areas but collapsing in others. In the old days of the viceroyalty a large portion of the country was living in great measure thanks to the transportation of silver from the Altoperuvian mines. Now, however, those mines were barely productive, as current technology could barely continue to exploit them and, in any case, the new nation of Bolivia had no reason whatsoever to export through the River Plate. The United Argentinean Provinces main exports were wool, leather and salted meat, all activities concentrated in the Pampas. The “ten ranches” minus Córdoba saw little income from those activities while their own economies faced direct competition from European industrial products. In fact, protectionist measures were the only thing keeping their economies afloat. That, in return, assured conflict with the powerful European countries – essentially the UK and France – looking for a market to export their products. And in an age where markets were opened by force if necessary, protectionist measures weren’t a nice path. A few sectors such as Mendoza’s wineries, Tucuman’s sugar plantation and salt exploitation in Cordoba would remain profitable and relative safe investments in the coming decades. A few other small scale “industries”, craftsmanship in reality, served the internal market, but those were precisely the most threatened by foreign imports. Other than that – and probably among the most important – the other activity to shield profits was the exploitation of the silver mines of Famatina, in La Rioja. That was the main source of income of Facundo Quiroga and one of the reasons why he would become a reference for so many other governors as well as one of the most important politicians of the period. His military skill would prove one of the other reasons.
Because, while the federal constitution had forbidden the provinces to have their own armies, it was well known that most rich landowners armed their workers and, under the excuse of the Indian raids, many of them kept their own private armies that, in some cases, could match the numbers of the national army’s garrison in the province. Quiroga in La Rioja, Lopez in Santa Fe and especially Rosas in Buenos Aires were some of those caudillos whose forces, albeit irregular weren’t intimidated by the army. Even the province of Corrientes’ senators defended in the Congress the right to arm their police… with artillery! The United Argentinean Provinces were, in those times, in an armament race with itself.

Mapa_pua_1821.png
 
IEnough bloodshed for the time being. For now, a boring update on this ATL Argentina's economy and politics, and a few things I've been thinking.


*Previously I've written that the new constitution declares the vote universal, secret and mandatory for men. However, IITL there is no reason whatsoever to make it mandatory, so it would really follow the American way and be universal and secret (at least in theory), but optional.

I agree, it seems logical

*As immigration wasn't a political issue in the 1820's as it was by the 1840's and 50's, there is no article nor anything in the 1829 constitution about it.

Perfectly logical:cool:

However, that won't stop the different governments from encouraging it. BTW, which nationalities are likely to inmigrate in this timeframe, other than Irish and Spanish? I guess Russians might show up, but I'm not sure

Don't know. Catholic Germans?:confused:


*Without a civil war and with two ports this ATL Argentina will evolve without that much of rivalry between the provinces and the city of Buenos Aires and, at least some sociologists claim, less pronounced divisions along political lines. That won't mean more political stability by itself, but it would mean less hatred for those who have a different ideology. In other words, strong divisions such as those facing peronist and anti-peronist (and that was one of the many OTL divisions) would be less likely and less extreme. In OTL Argentina's national identity was born in the middle of a long civil war, which is not the case ITTL

Well, while the firt part is very likely, I don't personally think that the divission between Peronists and non Peronists had much to do with the division between Unitarians and Federal. From the late 1860s till the 1945, Argentina didn't suffer great divvisions, so I don't think the civil war had such an influence in futur events (OK, there was the thing between radicals and conservatives, but still..)


*With the non violent downfall of the Unitarian party (and the commercial and intellectual elite) in importance but, at the same time, a more democratic country where the opposition doesn't need to go to exile or be brutally repressed(as long as they don't try to shoot governors, that's it) and can present to elections - and be discredited - I think a slightly less europhile elite - or at least mentality - might form. Plus, they won't be wishing for the illuminated european inmigrants for decades, they'll see them soon enough. And they won't like them. That of course, would have pros and cons. Plus, with more political stability and less need to fight Rosas' dictatorship (as there isn't one), upcoming events would have a more lasting cultural impact.

Very interesting! I like focusing not only in military consequences of Pods, but also on social and cultural aspects of them. If not TLs became a mere game of risk, all more or less the same: 1) Pod; 2) country X gets more territory and does better than IOTL 3) Cuntry Y does worse.

Anyway. Here comes the bloodless update and MAPS! (Well, one map really). I'll see if I can add the next update sooner, but exams have a way of demanding priority (and I have a way of hating them for that)


The United Argentinean Provinces in 1830



(...)

Great update.:)

Just one question: wouldn't having Uruguay in Argentina favour commercial interests, exportable crops and free trade policies over Northern crafts and "industries" even more than IOTL?

I don't think it's necesary so, because IOTL Corrientes governor was protectionist, despite being in Mesopotamia, and other federalists were. I'm not sure about Artigas, but he might also have been protectionist. I know he favoured land distribution policies, but I don't know for sure what he (or other Uruguayan federalists) thought about the issue.

In any case, even if democratic federalist hold political power, Northern industries would need more than protectionist tariffs to survive, modernize and thrive.
-------------------------------------------------------------------

In the long run, however, unless something is done, if immigrants established mainly in the pampas, Uruguay and Mesopotamia, this part of the country will gradually had much more demographical and economical weight than the rest (as IOTL).

The existance of the the Banda Oriental might act as a counterweight to Buenos Aires, allying with the other provinces (even with provinces whose econimies differ more from Uruguay than that of Buenos aires) against any attempt to establish centralist policies. We'll probably get a more federalist country, even if not necesary a country in which wealth and population are evenly distributed geographically...

...unless of course something is done in this respect the TL:)
 
I was thinking in an earlier regency. Although I've been also liking the idea of Brazil turning into a constitutional monarchy as a compromise solution, but it seems an unlikely outcome.
Not so unlikely, as the country almost was a "Parliament's Republic" during the regencial time. IOTL, after Pedro's abdication, the Brazilian politicians during this period were divided in three factions: the radical liberals (urban middle class), the moderated liberals (rural aristocracy) and the restorers (Portuguese and absolutists who wanted Pedro back). As now he is dead, the Restorers won't exist, and so the liberals will dominate the political scenario. However, the main divide among the radicals and the moderate (besides the urban/rural differences) is that the radicals wanted a more federated country, with more power to the provinces (some of them even were Republicans) while the moderateds defended a centralized monarchy, but with the power relying on the Parliament.

IOTL, even if politically absurd, the Radicals allied with the Restorers, as the Regents Moderateds and also the Parliament was controlled by them. ITTL I can imagine Brazil developing even earlier a political division about the issue of provincial powers and the role of central government, with earlier revolts.

Regarding Portugal, yes, Pedro's death will have butterflies there. But since my knowledge of Portugese history is close to nothing, I have no idea on how to elaborate.

Well, basically his brother Miguel won't have no one to seriouly challenge and stop him from usurp the throne that should have gone to Pedro's daughter, princess Maria. IOTL the agreement made by Pedro and Miguel was that Miguel would recognize Maria's claim, but he would marry her and become king consort, as a way to keep the House of Braganza ruling the country. But in 1828 he asked the Courts to assemble and they chose him as king of Portugal, basically usurping Maria's rights. He had support from Britain and France, but only until the fall of Wellington's government and the deposition of Charles X. Also, Austria, that until now was neutral as Miguel was an absolutist, started to be against him, as Maria was a granddaughter of the Emperor.

I think that without Pedro to rally the Portuguese Liberals his brother Miguel would have more chances of remain as king. However, there is the problem of what to do with Maria. Also, an Miguelist Portugal could have interesting consequences for the Carlist War in Spain, as Miguel supported Carlos against the liberals.

*As immigration wasn't a political issue in the 1820's as it was by the 1840's and 50's, there is no article nor anything in the 1829 constitution about it. However, that won't stop the different governments from encouraging it. BTW, which nationalities are likely to inmigrate in this timeframe, other than Irish and Spanish? I guess Russians might show up, but I'm not sure.

Probably Germans would be an option. Brazil received German immigrants during this period, there is no reason to them not go to Argentina too.
 
Ok, exams are over, so let's get back to this
Well, while the firt part is very likely, I don't personally think that the divission between Peronists and non Peronists had much to do with the division between Unitarians and Federal. From the late 1860s till the 1945, Argentina didn't suffer great divvisions, so I don't think the civil war had such an influence in futur events (OK, there was the thing between radicals and conservatives, but still..)
It's just a theory that claims that Argentinean society is prone to fall in such strong divisions because of the civil war. Who knows :rolleyes:

Just one question: wouldn't having Uruguay in Argentina favour commercial interests, exportable crops and free trade policies over Northern crafts and "industries" even more than IOTL?
Indeed. But Dorrego can't politically afford it. Of course, his term ends in 1834.

I don't think it's necesary so, because IOTL Corrientes governor was protectionist, despite being in Mesopotamia, and other federalists were. I'm not sure about Artigas, but he might also have been protectionist. I know he favoured land distribution policies, but I don't know for sure what he (or other Uruguayan federalists) thought about the issue.
Well, Artigas is in exile in Paraguay (so far) Regarding other leaders, I still have some research to make. They'll probably go to whatever suits the business and allies best.
In any case, even if democratic federalist hold political power, Northern industries would need more than protectionist tariffs to survive, modernize and thrive.
Yes. Probably something like ASBs
ITTL I can imagine Brazil developing even earlier a political division about the issue of provincial powers and the role of central government, with earlier revolts.
Indeed. Brazil won't look nice for a few more years
I think that without Pedro to rally the Portuguese Liberals his brother Miguel would have more chances of remain as king.
So do I. I'm still thinking about Portugal though. Butteflies there can have butteflies in Spain, which at the same time would have further butterflies. Which might end up leading with a heir to the Prussian throne with full use of both hands or a certain Italian mercenary, sorry "soldier", by the name of Giuseppe getting killed. But I'm not sure if I want to explore such far reaching consecuencies.

Anyway, here's the update

The Argentinean second presidency (part one)

Manuel Dorrego started his presidency as a man in the shadows. He was the man who has managed to unite the caudillos under a single constitution once and for all, he was the man that succeeded in holding the country together and he was the man that managed to retake the Banda Oriental from the Brazilians. But he wasn’t acclaimed for that. The victory in the war was credited to San Martín, which in turn allowed him to reconcile with the people of Buenos Aires. The political arrangements that allowed the 1829 Constitution were credited to Facundo Quiroga. And all the merits of his administration were credited to his powerful minister Manuel Belgrano and Rosas, while all the polemics and flaws were credited to himself.

Belgrano, appointed only economy minister, spread his ideas and influence through Dorrego’s cabinet – with Dorrego’s consent, a fact many times forgotten. The law 42, setting the foundations of public education, the construction of hundreds of schools and training of teachers was almost a copy of Belgrano’s writing a quarter of a century ago, when he exposed his ideas in a little smuggler’s port newspapers and administrative departments. This time however, the smuggler’s port was the capitol of a new nation and said ideas became the backbone of governmental policies. Public schools segregated by gender were built and opened in every city and town across the country. There children were to be taught writing, mathematics, geography, history, religion, drawing, and the technical knowledge to thrive in each region’s particular business. Once the children finished that period of elementary education Belgrano set up schools of commerce, masonry, carpentry, seamanship and other technical jobs. Books whose access was restricted or completely forbidden by the Catholic Index were printed by the State to be available in public libraries, further straining the relationship between the UAP and Rome. Teachers and professors were hired from Europe in order to train local teachers as the country found itself in difficulty trying to fill the large number teaching posts to be filled. And indeed the country would be short of professors for one or two generations. Although, as the census would prove later on, the country was simply short of people. Particular attention was paid to the Universities issue. Rivadavia had founded a university in Buenos Aires in 1821, which provided the new country with two universities: the new one in Buenos Aires and the old and traditional one in Cordoba.

Belgrano intended at first to close the University of Buenos Aires as, giving the small educated population of the country, supporting two universities seemed a waste of resources. That lead, not only to massive protest and even demonstrations from the new UBA but also to the negative of the professors in the traditional University of Cordoba to update their classes with the more liberal content Belgrano intended for the new country. Trying to close the University of Cordoba resulted in the protest and demonstrations coming from Cordoba instead. And when Quiroga (ejem!) Cordoba's governor Bustos interceded for the University of Cordoba the federal government desisted in closing one of them. Once the issue was resolved the professors of the UBA showed pretty enthusiastic in adopting a liberal, scientific stance while the more conservative ones in Cordoba refused to do so. As a result the UBA taught mathematics, physics, chemistry, medicine, veterinary, law, economy and most of the early sciences of the 19th Century. The University of Cordoba, in turn, taught theology, law and a medicine course that was strongly underrated when compared with the one in the UBA. In time this would produce the saying “if you want your son to become a priest, send him to Cordoba. If you want him to make money, send him to Buenos Aires” which would simplify the choice for many wealthy parents in the years to come.

Of course the main issue with this massive educational plan was the budget. By 1830 the United Argentinean Provinces were barely recovering from the war and a fair amount of money had to be invested in recovering the Banda Oriental’s economy, as well as in improving roads, bridges and other infrastructure works. Belgrano, however, didn’t want to lose the political opportunity to begin with his plan – either that, or he knew he didn’t had much more time left to see it done himself. The answer was simple: British loans. Schools, cattle, tools and a lot of other stuff the country needed were bought by taking loans that would take decades to pay off and will burden the budget in the coming years. It’s therefore unfair that to this day Belgrano is called “The father of the school” while Dorrego is called “The father of foreign debt” since one was to pay the other - and had indeed pay off multiple times it’s cash value.

Belgrano’s work in his role as economy minister aimed to set the foundations of an agrarian export based economy. The years following the war saw a large increase in the production of primary goods such as wool, leathers, salted meat and a bit of cotton in the north. This favored the economy of the easternmost provinces, while the western ones, with less fertile lands, fell behind, merely trying to compete with imports in the internal market. The great drawback of such an economic model, and one that Belgrano himself foresaw as his late writings and classes’ records indicate, was the lack of added value production of a primary, although diversified, goods based economy. There was, however, little to be done about it as the small population base – and hence the small market – didn’t make profitable the establishment of steam powered factories, if the UAP could get the technology to begin with. One area however were Belgrano enticed the development of finished products was shipbuilding. Recognizing the importance of a merchant fleet, as well as a war fleet for coastal defense, Belgrano ordered the purchase of a rather small number of vessels to the British shipyards. However, at the same time, he decided to improve and enlarge the small shipbuilding facilities located in the province of Corrientes. The place was ideal for several reasons. For one, it was located near the Chaco forests, meaning that one of the main raw materials didn’t have to be transported at long distances. Iron could also be obtained from those iron balls scattered around the landscape in the region: meteorites were used to build ships, and many of these valuable stones from space now lay at the bottom of the sea or were eventually sold for scrap decades later when the ships were decommissioned, for the irritation of 20th Century astronomers around the world. The other important reason is that, being in a river miles away from the sea, the place was far less vulnerable in the event of war or blockade, as it would have been the case if it were located in the River Plate. Workers were trained, tools imported and further British loans obtained. The facilities would later begin to manufacture river barges. That was, and is, heavily criticized as, with the idea of producing something other than primary goods, the government imported the large vessels that would trade local exports but the manufactured ships were only used by internal transportation. It has to be noted, however, that shipbuilding isn’t a simple process. Those barges not only proved essential to improve the economy before railroads were the norm and improving communications between Buenos Aires and the Banda Oriental, their availability also gave the starting base for the Argentinean fishing fleet. Some have even gone as far as arguing that without the federal support for local shipbuilding in Dorrego’s administration fish wouldn’t even be one of the major elements of Argentinean cuisine today. Eventually, with that experience, those facilities would begin to build larger oceangoing vessels and small warships. However, before they could begin operations blood had to be spilled.

The main issue that Dorrego had to deal regarding the army was, without a doubt, making sure it remained loyal to the state. This in turn meant that officers were not selected for their achievements or their potential, but for their political reliability. It also meant that espionage was the norm. A full internal espionage network was put in place by Dorrego, despite he really didn’t want to. Every caudillo, important businessman and army officer knew, at that time, that his mail was likely be opened and some of his men and employees would be working for the government. The army garrisons across the country were put in place not only to watch for the hostile Indians and to respond possible foreign interventions, but mainly to counter local caudillos. The larger garrison wasn’t as it would be expected in the Banda Oriental, but in Santa Fé. Under the command of the promoted French general Brandsen that garrison had the task of keeping in check Santa Fé and Entre Ríos caudillos and move quickly in support of the Buenos Aires garrison in case an uprising happened in that province. Just as a token, it was also near to the Brazilian border. Dorrego had defined it pretty clear in his later years, when interviewed by the historian and journalist Bartolome Mitre. He said “That garrison was the guy standing in a pulpería between two drunk men keeping an eye in both of them and warns them not get into a fight”.

So, when Dorrego’s announced the government would put money in the Corrientes shipyards, it was only a matter of time before everyone realized that the Chaco’s real state had suddenly increased its value. Occupied by natives and not properly part of either Santa Fe or Corrientes, Santa Fé’s governor Estanislao Lopez grouped together his militias and marched north quickly. Brandsen, understanding that Lopez might get into blows with Corrientes’ governor Pedro Ferre, readied his men for the journey north. However, in those times were reliability was of paramount importance and a little bit of paranoia was a good idea, Brandsen wasted valuable time in waiting instructions from Dorrego. When his garrison finally reached Chaco he found an all out war between Lopez and Ferre militias, with the Indians fighting as well. He would later recall that it wasn’t neither his intentions nor his instructions to side with Ferre. By a matter of chance and misjudgment on the part of the Santa Fé’s caudillo led to Lopez attack on the national army. Better training and equipment quickly led to the defeat of Lopez. The attack on national forces on the part of Lopez suited Facundo Quiroga fine, as he long had a grudge with Lopez and his representatives in the national Congress proposed giving the Chaco to the province of Corrientes in order to finish the dispute. Things turned out worse for Lopez, as the province of Santa Fe was also ordered to pay reparations for the loss of life.

Corrientes governor Ferre, who was already wary of Paraguayan incursions in Corrientes’ northeast, then asked the Congress permission to arm their “police” with heavy weapons, including artillery. The permission was rejected but additional men were dispatched to the army garrison in the region, and its commander sacked for not acting when provincial militias fought each other. Ferre would later reach an agreement with the local Indians which opened the Chaco woods for exploitation. Such woods would not only be used for ships, but for furniture and paper as well, although those activities didn’t fare well in the coming years. The Paraguayan and Brazilian authorities in the meantime, took notice of the conflict.

The emperor, the regents and the slaves

When the people of Rio de Janeiro remembered that faithful year of 1829 two things came to their mind. The first one was the exquisite state funeral given to Pedro I, with his coffin parading through the streets of the city while thousands mourned the man that gave them independence and had openly spoken against slavery. The other thing was the huge political turmoil that followed up the funeral. The Empire had lost their emperor. The heir to the throne was merely 4 years old, a war had been lost, a huge debt caused by the independence and the war was burdening the economy and the parliament was dominated by landowners that saw the central government as a possible threat to their own affairs. Word had also spread along the slave barracks across the country: a slave had killed the emperor. And if one of their own people had the guts to attack the emperor himself, what stopped each one of them of doing the same thing to their masters? The parliament had barely begun to discuss who to appoint as regents for Pedro II when slave rebellions swept the country.

Although the parliament was dominated by the liberals, they didn’t went as far as appoint two or three of them as regents. Hence, the three regents that would exert the executive and moderating power in the name of Pedro II gave representation to the different parties. The first regents were Bernardo Pereira de Vasconcelos, appointed by the liberals; Nicolau Pereira de Campos Vergueiro, representing the Bonifacians and Felisberto Caldeira Brant Pontes de Oliveira e Horta, marquis of Barbacena, not quite pleasing the absolutists but they didn’t have that many opportunities in the power struggle anyway. With the budget strained, one of the first measures of the new government was downsizing the armed forces, essentially finishing the contracts with the European mercenaries in both land and sea. That suited the liberals fine, as they were determined to undermine the power of the federal government. There weren’t really a single idea on which policies to implement among them so many discussions both in the parliament and in their meeting were about how to deal with the federal government. Some positions happened to coincide with the extreme bonifacian position about turning Brazil into a parliamentary democracy of some kind, but while the bonifacians favored a republic, the liberals preferred some kind of constitutional monarchy were the emperor’s powers were very limited. More extreme positions claimed for some kind of loose confederacy, merely united together for common defense and little more. Other positions simply wanted to keep the emperor while controlling his powers, and in the end, the regency sort of worked like a parliamentary republic. At least, until Pedro II came of age. The main problem was that any change required a constitutional change, which meant agreeing with the bonifacians and absolutist, and both of them had so different views on the subject that an agreement didn’t seem possible.

Laws, however, were a different matter and with the parliament and a third of the regency in their hands, they could make sure the essential ones where those they wanted. The reduction in size of the navy, key to move the national army along such vast distances was one of them. Allowing the creation of local militias, in charge of the respective governors – and landowners – to suppress rebellions (or to organize them when it came to that) went ahead as well.

The real issue motivating these policies wasn’t some kind of laissez faire economy. It was federalism and, most important, slavery. The liberals knew that Pedro I had intended to finish with the slave trade and, deep down, they were relieved that he was dead. The bonifacians were against slavery as well but, so far, were a minority in the parliament. The liberal’s concern was that a strong central government could ban slavery, as well as messing with their business in many other ways. And while they kept the majority in the parliament and the regency allowed them to support their policies in the place of the emperor the antislavery agenda could be supported in the future. A weak central government with a bare minimum of soldiers, in the other hand, might very well be unable to contest their power and would have to allow slavery to continue. So the Brazilian armed forces were downsized, landowners allowed to form and improve their own militias, which were to be grouped together as “national guard”, a supposedly federal militarized force for internal “security”, but were in reality subject to the local landlords and held no obedience, neither in paper nor in practice, to the regents.

This political infighting did, of course, little to improve the difficult economic situation causing general unrest among the population. And the slaves, encouraged by the killing of the emperor by one of them, oppressed by the thugs, militias and national guard and without any prospect of a nearby end of slavery, begun to revolt. What simply seemed to be sporadic small scale uprisings which could be put down by thugs or local militias begun to escalate by late 1830 into massive revolts that put to the limit the capabilities of the incipient “national guard”. As soon as one rebellion was repressed – often ruthlessly – another shaked the country hundreds of kilometers away. Landlords across the country begun sending their militias in support of other landlords when their slaves rebelled, only to find out that their own slaves had taken advantage of that to rebel themselves and the landlord that lent their men in the first place had to run for his life. Reluctantly, the Parliament asked the regency to send in the army when a contingent of guards joined the rebels in the province of Maranhão. Unwillingly as well Vergueiro signed the order that allowed the army to kill the slaves he’d rather liberate. Just days after that news arrived to the Brazilian capitol about the battles between the Argentinean army and provincial militias in Chaco, and the fact that the United Argentinean Provinces planned to increase their garrison west of the Uruguay river. The Paraguayan ambassador had requested an audience with the regents about the issue, scared that the random skirmishes he had with local Argentinean militias in the Misiones area might erupt into a full fledged war.

While the UAP wasn’t seeking war with Brazil, there was still the border issue in the Eastern Misiones. And in the meantime the downsized Brazilian army was required to march all along the country putting down revolts. The regents decided that it was time to finish with the roots of the rebellions that were bleeding the country and the three of them send a project to the parliament to abolish slavery, threatening to delay and weaken the army’s intervention while they increased the southern garrisons. The parliament, however, considered that an empty threat and voted against abolishing slavery, stirring futher demonstrations in Rio and voted to remove Bernardo Pereira de Vasconcelos as a regent. With demonstrations turning into full scale riots, unauthorized , the national guard entered Rio to put them down, only to clash in skirmishes with the army units stationed there, whose captain didn’t know who the guards really were. Fearing that the liberals were planning on taking the government by force, the remaining two regents ordered the army units in Rio to press the attack. And thus, civil war begun.


(now, that's a long post)
 
Last edited:

maverick

Banned
Wait, Cordoba is under Quiroga's influence? I think I missed the part in which Bustos died...

I have to say, an alliance of Dorrego, San Martin and Belgrano does seem odd, since the last one I've never seen as the type to ally the federalist caudillos as opposed to the unitarian liberals of BS-AS...

It was nevertheless an interesting choice, albeit a complex one, in contrast to simpler solutions, such as Jose Maria Paz not being captured at El Tio, or San Martin taking the governorship of Buenos Aires in 1829...of course, that's too late to have us winning the Brazil war and keep Uruguay...
 
Nice chapter Juan!

About the projects for the abolition of slavery, there are some facts that might be useful.
In 1826 Brazil signed a treaty with the UK declaring that from March 1830 the slave trade to Brazil would be illegal. This treaty was complemented by a Brazilian law in 1831 stating the same thing. Unfortunately, both weren't respected, and the slave trade continued until 1850, when the UK approved the Bill Aberdeen.

However, at that time the farmers didn't know that the laws wouldn't work, so they decided to buy slaves before it would become illegal. Between 1827 and 1830 were brought to Brazil 175,000 African slaves, a quantity much higher than the normal due to the fear of the farmers they couldn't do it later. So at the time of the revolts of your TL there would thousands of new slaves, who wouldn't even know how to speak Portuguese and would be more willing to revolt. Also, as the trade would be illegal since 1830, all the new slaves would be much more expensive (just like IOTL) and buying them would only make the economical situation worse.

Also, as a consequence of the treaty with the UK, around 1830 many projects for abolition were made to the Parliament (of course, no one was approved). But they were mainly divided in two groups: those that had the focus on monetary compensation to the slaveholders and those that were more concerned about a slow abolition linked to the age of the slaves.
The first group defended that the slaves should receive freedom if they could pay for it. All slaves would be freed, but they should pay to their owners the value spent with them. So basically they would work for them until they had earned enough money to buy freedom. How would it work, I have no idea.
The other group defended a slow abolition according to the age of the slaves. One project defended that one year all the slaves older than 50 should be freed, withou indenization. The next year, all the slaves aged 49. The other, all the 48's, and so on. With this, they wanted a long process of abolition, to give time to the farmers to create an alternative source of manpower and do not change drastically the economy.

Other interesting thing is that in the 1830's there a proposal (again refused) to declared that all the public works should be made with free labour, in order not only to give an example, but to create conditions for a greater market of free workers.

Also, around 1830, when that mass of new slaves arrived, and due to the unstable political situation, some politicians were affraid that Brazil could have some kind of "Haiti situation", with great slave revolts, and they proposed a law that would force all the slaves not born in Brazil to be sent back to Africa. It actually had great support, but wasn't approved also.

Maybe ITTL some of these suggestions might be approved by the Parliament, or a combination of them.
 
I have to say, an alliance of Dorrego, San Martin and Belgrano does seem odd, since the last one I've never seen as the type to ally the federalist caudillos as opposed to the unitarian liberals of BS-AS...
And he probably didn't like Dorrego in a personal level. The issue is that an unitarian constitution would never obtain support in the provinces. In other words, the unitarian project could be either limited to Bs. As., creating a long term secession or had to be imposed by long and costly wars - in which the provinces might very well succed. And, in the 1820s, you didn't really need hindsight to see it. We don't have any documentation about Belgrano openly supporting either faction in the late 1810s, we know for sure he supported a centralist government in the early days of the revolution and that he intended to develop the country. By 1820s a centralist government wouldn't have worked, and attempts to impose it by force would simply delay the development of the country, or would just break it apart. Just under those circumstances, I still wouldn't think Belgrano would just ally with the federal caudillos. However, once Dorrego returns from the USA and begins to gather political support, he can (and did) devise a political project which could very well work. And it was probably the only one in his time that would. He had the support from the federalist caudillos and attempted to unite the country under a federal constitution, the only one the other 13 provinces would accept. The unitarian porteños would reject it though. Yet Dorrego managed to get a fair political support in Buenos Aires, plus the alliance with Rosas which gave him the military backing should/when it came to an armed unitarian rebellion. Did it have a 100% chance of success? Of course not. Did it imply a strong centralist government? Of course not, but it implied a agreeable national one. Would it be done without bloodshed? Probably not (and it didn't in OTL) but it had a good chance of military sucess and it would limit the bloodshed to a, albeit importat, small part of the national territory. The unitarian party OTOH could only offer, in a national level, a long, destructive, war. One of the options creates a chance of economic devolopment. The other one doesn't. And third one is the one San Martin took: retirement and inaction.
And in Dorrego's POV an alliance with Belgrano is a non-issue. It's easies the relationship with the porteño's liberals at no cost, while adding a prestigious man to his party


Wait, Cordoba is under Quiroga's influence? I think I missed the part in which Bustos died...
Se me escapó la tortuga :eek:
You got a point, edited.

About the projects for the abolition of slavery, there are some facts that might be useful.
(...)

Maybe ITTL some of these suggestions might be approved by the Parliament, or a combination of them.
Interesting. I'll look into it
 
Top