1 - 12 August 1940
allanpcameron
Donor
1 August 1940. Near Turnhout, Belgium.
The men of 5th Royal Tank Regiment had been issued with the first batch of Valentine tanks just before the battles of May. There had been lots of problems with the tanks. Because of the rushed production, they were unreliable and because of the design, they were cramped. The first tanks off the production line had gone straight to 5RTR who felt they were being used to put the prototypes through their paces in action. In general, they had proven reasonable battle tanks, but suffered from falling between two stools. They were too slow to be cruisers and too lightly protected to be infantry tanks. Once they got used to them, 5RTR had grown happy enough with the Valentine, for all its faults.
Vickers-Armstrong had been fully informed of the problems and concerns that their new tanks had caused. They were now unloading a set of replacement tanks. Like the first lot, these were the first month’s production, literally just off the production line. Although there were only twelve, not quite enough for one squadron, it was hoped that 5RTR would put them through their paces and again give the company their feedback. As promised Vickers had produced a three-man turret by modifications to allow the addition of a loader to ease the duties of the commander. The turret’s side armour was reduced to save weight. It still had the 2-pdr gun, but the turret was certainly an improvement over the first one. It was also received an improved engine to give it slightly better power and speed. Vickers had also noted the comments about the size of hatches, and these tanks had been modified to give an extra few inches to each hatch.
The men had a tour of the new tanks and then took them out to put them through their paces. They did indeed find them improved, but the same problems existed in terms of reliability. The kind of craftsmanship practised by British workers (some joked that it was the ability to fit two things together which do not fit) meant that many man hours were spent by the Battalion’s fitters and mechanics trying to keep tanks on the road. While work was going on to improve mass production in Britain’s factories, there was still a long way to go. The tracks were a particular cause for swearing.
The other innovation, much debated among the gunners, was the decision to change the gun mounting. British tank crews had been trained to fire on the move. Therefore, the guns in British tanks were braced against the gunner’s shoulder, and he physically controlled the position of the gun as he fired. However, it was clear that firing on the move was a thing of the past. Despite the poor performance of the German 37mm anti-tank gun, German tactics for its employment were much better that the British tankers had expected.
As the 2-pdr’s HE shell was limited at best, the fact was that the tanks spent much more time fighting German anti-tank gun screens than they did panzers. This made the need for ‘one shot – one kill’ essential for the survival of the tank. The professionals who started the war had adequate training for firing on the move, but those who were currently training weren’t getting as much time as needed to learn the skill. The decision had been made to make the mount of the gun stable, to be traversed laterally and vertically by controls, rather than the gunner’s body. The fact that the tank should stop and fire was anathema to some commanders. It was said that Percy Hobart was furious, but as the future tanks were going to have larger guns, and the size of the Royal Armoured Corps increased, it was judged a necessary change.
2 August 1940. Hatfield.
Geoffrey De Havilland took the second prototype on its first flight, finding it to be everything the design team hoped for. The first prototype, W4050, had flown in June. Now the second, in a fighter configuration, was being tested to see if it had ironed out the teething troubles of the first prototype. Men from the Air Ministry watched and were delighted with the way in which the plane seemed to fulfil their expectations. It looked like there would be no need for a third prototype, so pre-production models were expected to be built next. If these proved themselves, the Air Ministry wanted mass production to begin as soon as possible.
3 August 1940. Ottawa. Canada.
Prime Minister McKenzie King: “So, we have two Infantry Divisions now in France and Belgium; the air training plan is going very well; and the RCN is expanding. The production of vehicles is ramping up along with mineral extraction and agriculture. Support for the war in Quebec is growing in the light of the French resistance to German aggression, and the bombing of Paris. The question now is, what more can Canada do?
Clarence Howe (Minister for Munitions and Supply): Obviously we can’t touch conscription, but perhaps we could do more to move to a complete war economy. So far, London hasn’t been overly directive in what they want from us, beyond what you’ve mentioned, and that scientific group that has come over.
James Ralston (Minister of National Defence): If the Quebecois are coming around, maybe we could get conscription, but I know you don’t want to fight that battle yet. Our third Division should be Armoured, but that raises the question of what tank we build. General Motor’s group in Britain, Vauxhall, have the contract for a new tank for next year. For myself, I would argue that three divisions should form a Canadian Corps, with Canadian leadership. That should mirror the ANZACs, and also, we should have a better say in its employment.
The Air Training Plan is going to be our major contribution in terms of investment and personnel. The training structure includes twelve elementary flying training schools, sixteen advanced or service flying training schools, ten air observer schools, ten bombing and gunnery schools, two air navigation schools and four wireless or radio training school. The number of training aircraft needed is estimated at 3500. That lot will cost a great deal of money, to be met by ourselves, with contributions from the British and to a lesser extent Australia and New Zealand. The British want to meet most of their cost in kind, supplying engines and such.
Most of our aircraft building facilities are making trainers. De Havilland, in Downsview, Ontario, are building Tiger Moth trainers at the moment. They are talking of expanding as they have a new twin engine plane that they’re going to start on soon. Noorduyn are making Havard trainers. Fairchild in Quebec are producing Cornells. Fairchild are also building Bristol Blenheims, though they call them Bolingbrokes. The Bolingbrooke has a duel use as trainers and patrol aircraft.
National Steel Car in Malton are currently making Lysander army cooperation planes, and sub-contracting for various other aircraft, especially Ansons and Hurricanes. We need the Ansons for multi-engine training. Canadian Associated Aircraft are building Hampdens for the RAF. The concentration on so many trainers is obviously to help the expansion of the Air Training Plan.
Prime Minister McKenzie King: So, we’ll be producing pilots, trucks and food. One Corps, seems fair, and there should be enough volunteers to keep them up to strength. We really need to have a voice within the Imperial General Staff, we must learn the lessons of the last lot. I’m meeting President Roosevelt later this month, there have been some initial talks about what kind of cooperation we can have regarding defence of North America. I certainly am keen on bringing the Americans further into the fold, without straining things with London too much.
3 August 1940. In the skies over Germany.
Sgt George 'Grumpy' Unwin and A Flight of 19 Squadron were on their first combat sortie since transitioning onto the Spitfire Mk II. It had felt as if the air war had calmed down a little over the last month or so, each side licking its wounds and rebuilding. Today four of the new Spitfire squadrons were flying top cover for a raid by Wellingtons of 3 Group of Bomber Command. The target for the Wellingtons was the airfield at Mönchengladbach. This had been bombed on numerous occasions, but it was still a target, as it is very difficult to close down an airfield permanently. The presence of such a large number of bombers on a daylight raid, was hopefully too tempting a target for the Me109s.
The RDF ground controller called out the arrival of the German defenders. The RAF’s continual attacks on German radars had left the Luftwaffe still at a distinct disadvantage against raids such as this. They were having to rely on ground observers for the most part. The German aircraft that attempted to intercept the RAF raid did so in a piecemeal fashion. With the much more advanced radars available to guide the Spitfires, Unwin and the other Spitfire pilots fell on the Me109s again and again, mostly before they got to the bombers.
Unwin’s squadron dived out of the sun onto a squadron of Bf109s that were still trying to climb to altitude before attacking the bombers. The arrival of the Spitfires, all armed with four 20mm canons, was a terrible surprise to the Luftwaffe pilots. Unwin scored his eleventh kill as the cannon shells hacked a Messerschmitt out of the sky. The Spitfires didn’t hang around. Having dived through the enemy formation they climbed back to their original height, ready for a second pass. Six Me109s and one Spitfire were tumbling to the earth, as the surviving German fighters attempted to reform.
Where Unwin’s Mk I Spitfire was at best a match for the Bf109, these Mk IIs now held a distinct advantage. This was an advantage which Unwin and his squadron mates made full use of. Another three Bf109s were shot down, and the survivors were all running as fast as they could for home. One more Spitfire was shot down and another damaged, but as 19 Squadron returned to base, 9 kills for 2 losses seemed like a good day’s work. Altogether the Germans lost 19 aircraft attacking the British raid, with another six damaged. Four Spitfires failed to return, and another four had various levels of damage. Five Wellingtons were lost, mostly to flak. The damage to the airfield was judged moderate. Later it became clear that the airfield had been abandoned, as the Luftwaffe had generally pulled back behind the Rhine.
4 August 1940. Seelin, France. RAF Forward airbase.
53 Squadron had all the surviving Blenheims in France bar one. 139 Squadron’s “C” for Charlie had been given a very specific task. The fight against the German radar had been one of the odd parts of the war. They had initially been “listening” for known frequencies of the various types of German radar, but it was obvious that the Germans were doing everything they could to change frequencies as much as possible to hamper this part of the RAF’s effort. When that became obvious at the end of May a new boffin with a different piece of equipment had arrived and “C” for Charlie had been the recipient.
Flight Lieutenant Paddy Green had been briefed on the importance of this bit of kit, and the importance of it never falling into enemy hands. He had been aggrieved to discover that as part of the installation a small explosive charge and fuse had been included that was to be used if the aircraft was in danger of being compromised. As the plane’s commander he wondered if putting live explosives into it, with all the attendant risks, wasn’t just asking for trouble.
What was worse was the observer, Bill Neville, who was assigned. He wasn’t RAF, but Fleet Air Arm, and he wasn’t very complementary about Crab Air, as he seemed to enjoy calling the RAF. But the man knew how to use the device, which he called Orange Crop. It swept the frequency band, and when it picked up a source it warbled, allowing Bill to identify it and locate it. He was then able to call in a flight of Hurribombers who would attack it. Bill mentioned that someone was working on a rocket that would be able to ride the beam back to its source, he called it a Shrike, but it seemed that it would be sometime before it would be ready. In the meantime, Paddy’s job was to fly the Blenheim well behind the Entente front line. They were always accompanied by one of the new Beaufighters with AI radar. While Bill listened for enemy radar on his receiver, it was becoming clearer that the Germans were emplacing their radars further back than before. The Blenheim, and Orange Crop, weren’t allowed to fly over German held territory. Some other plan was going to have to be dreamt up to seek out the German radar.
3 August 1940. John I. Thornycroft & Company. Woolston, Southampton.
Commander Paul Canter, former captain of HMS Active, leading the design team for the Ton class minesweeper, celebrated the Admiralty’s decision to commission their design. An initial order for ten were placed with Thornycroft and its group of fifteen smaller yards that would build the ships. With double mahogany hull planking, almost the entire vessel was to be constructed from light aluminium alloy and other materials with the lowest possible magnetic field to achieve optimum safety when sweeping for magnetic mines. They would be protected from pressure mines by their low displacement, and the threat of moored mines was greatly reduced by their shallow draught. To prevent potential damage caused by marine parasites, they would be fitted at first with a copper sheath.
Canter had a team trying to “invent” ‘Cascover’ nylon sheathing. DuPont had been approached by ICI for a license to make nylon for the British market, and work was being done on a whole lot of new chemicals and epoxies in various universities and factories. There weren’t enough chemistry degrees in the Bristol Group men to satisfy everyone, but all sorts of materials were being examined in great detail for a variety of uses.
The Ton class that Canter had captained earlier in his career, HMS Gavington, was powered by two Deltic diesel engines built in the 1950s by Napier & Sons. Three companies with experience of building diesel engines, Perkins, Mirrlees and L. Gardner & Sons had been working with the Bristol Group to make improved Diesel engines. These would have applications for all types of vehicles and ships. There were a number of diesel engines and generators in the Bristol Group, and many of the engineering officers had had plenty of experience on engines, including the Deltic. The design for the Ton Class had taken a Deltic clone as its proposed engine. There was a lack of torsional vibration in the Deltics that made them handy for mine sweeping vessels.
The upper works were as much as Canter and a few other officers and ratings who had served on Ton class ships remembered. It would be armed with a Bofors 40mm gun, and have the capacity to carry two Oerlikon 20mm guns, or other heavy machine guns for self-protection. While the Type 193 mine hunting sonar was still a long way from being developed, the new ships were designed with it in mind. Once it was developed, the Ton Class would be mine hunters as well as mine sweepers.
4 August 1940. Over Thames Estuary.
Pilot officer James Wilson, with Johnny Campbell working the Air Interception Radar were on the tail of yet another intruder attempting to lay mines in the shipping lanes into London. Over the last month this had been their nightly duty in B for Baker, their Bristol Beaufighter Nightfighter. The RAF Hampdens had been doing sterling work mining the German ports, and the Luftwaffe were trying to repay the compliment. The Germans had deployed both acoustic and magnetic mines, faster than they had in the Bristol Group’s experience, and while the Royal Navy was in a better position to counter them, it was thought better to prevent them being laid in the first place.
Wilson and Campbell, along with the rest of their squadron, were prepared every night to search for prey. The German intruders were mostly Ju-88s, a fast bomber. B for Baker had a speed advantage, but not by too much. The RAF nightfighters also had excellent radar coverage. HMS Bristol had been brought to the port of Felixstowe, where it was camouflaged by day and sailed at night to provide enhanced radar coverage for the lower North Sea. At least two Beaufighters would be on constant patrol, ready to be guided by Bristol’s control team.
The radio sparked to life, “Baker 1, we have custom for you, three bogies”, giving the bearing and height. Wilson acknowledged and swung the heavy fighter onto an intercept course, allowing the gentle dive to increase his speed for the interception. Campbell was scanning the AI radar ready to try to pick up the bogies. They generally found trying to locate an aircraft below them was beyond the radar’s capability. Relying on Bristol’s well practiced team to guide him, Wilson rapidly closed on the German aircraft. There was enough moonlight to give Wilson a visual sighting of the trailing aircraft. Campbell was struggling still to get a clear signal from among the general surface return. With the Ju-88 firmly in his sights, he opened fire with the four machine guns, and when they were on the target, added a two second burst from the four 20mm canons. The German bomber disintegrated, its port wing separating from the fuselage, and the rest spinning into the sea. “Splash one bogie”, Wilson reported.
The other two aircraft split up and went in opposite directions. Wilson followed the one that turned to port, applying full military power to try to overtake it. The German pilot took his plane down to wave top height and was running for his life. The Beaufighter closed the range steadily. More in hope than in expectation, Wilson fired a burst of machine gun bullets. The rear gunner in the Ju-88 must have reported this, because the German pilot began taking evasive actions, but as he was so low, he tipped the end of his wing into a wave and the whole aircraft cartwheeled, crashing to its demise. Wilson pulled up hard to avoid the wreckage, and to gain some height. “Splash second bogie, and I literally mean, ‘splash’” Wilson reported.
HMS Bristol’s air controller gave him an update on the position of the third bogie, but there was little chance of catching it now. He climbed to five thousand feet, checking his fuel state, Campbell relaxing somewhat from his radar screen. Wilson hoped to pick off the intruder as it exited the area, but he saw flashes of flak coming from the picket ships off Sheerness and a large explosion which looked a lot like a plane exploding. The kind of explosion where perhaps a shell had detonated one of the mines it was carrying. This was confirmed by Bristol control, the threat board read all clear, so Wilson took the Beaufighter up to ten thousand feet and took up a long racetrack pattern until it was time to return to base. Most nights nothing at all happened, so at least they would have some to report to the debriefing officer when they got back. Then bacon and eggs, and off to bed.
5 August 1940. The Admiralty. London.
Captain Hugo White, formerly captain of HMS Avenger, a type 21 Frigate, sat listening to the debate about whether or not to keep attempting to slip submarines into the Baltic. The first group of six had lost two and had one damaged. They had also stirred up a hornets nest. There was heavy increase in Kriegsmarine activity in the narrows around Denmark. A second group of four submarines had attempted to enter the Baltic not long after the first group left. However only one succeeded, two were lost and one more limped into Oslo damaged. The one that succeeded, HMS Sterlit, was now overdue.
White had commanded an Oberon class submarine, and been commander of Submarine Sea Training in his time. This knowledge and experience had stood him in good stead when he had become a frigate driver and expert in anti-submarine warfare. Seeing the problem from both sides helped and when asked for his opinion he suggested a very radical plan.
5 August 1940. Royal Naval College, Greenwich, London.
Captain James Weatherall, formerly of HMS Andromeda, sat with the senior staff as they talked about the changes that were planned to the training courses for Royal Navy Officers and ratings. Weatherall had passed out from Dartmouth in 1954, and had served in a number of capacities, including as Commander of Seamanship Training after the Cod wars with Iceland.
Weatherall compared the course that he had completed, a course that had evolved in the light of the Second World War, to the current course, that of 1940. It was clear that there was a lot of room for improvement. Some of the basics would be the same, no matter what era the training was taking place in, that was the easy bit. Officers being trained now, would have to deal with huge technological advances that were under development. These developments would transform anti-submarine warfare, the asdic they were used to was going to become sonar. In anti-aircraft warfare, the use of radar and missiles would have to be dealt with. In engineering, they would soon start to see not just steam plants, but gas turbines.
The Royal Navy was trying to manage a vastly expanded class size, made up of conscripts, rather than the volunteers they were used to. HMS Collingwood and HMS Raleigh had been opened in January 1940 as the Training Establishment for "hostilities only' ratings of the Seaman Branch. There were batches of about 1000 trainees joining every 3 weeks for a 10-week course. HMS Ganges, another shore establishment had to be taken over for this purpose. HMS King Alfred, had trained new officers from the pre-war Royal Navy Volunteer (Supplementary) Reserve (RNV(S)R). It was now providing training for the RNVR, a training course which consisted of the first two weeks at HMS King Alfred II, then six weeks at HMS King Alfred III and the final four weeks at Hove. Upon successful completion of the course, the men emerged as Temporary Acting Probationary Sub-Lieutenants and attended further training at the Royal Naval College, Greenwich before being posted operationally.
Weatherall had been appointed by the Oversight Committee to help guide the process of making sure that the officers and ratings being trained now, would be ready to face the future navy requirements. It was important that as much of the technical know-how of the future was disseminated as widely as possible, so that after the war was finished these men could be at the fore-front of the new industrial revolution that would come.
He had brought along three of his officers from Andromeda, Commanders Mike Cowley, David Watson and Lieutenant-Commander Mark Whyte. Cowley was the ship’s engineer and Watson was senior weapons officer. There were plenty of other jobs that these two men could have been doing, but Weatherall needed them here to implement some of the changes. The two Commanders had been commissioned from Dartmouth in the 1970s, by which time the course had changed again from Weatherall’s time. Mark Whyte was a ‘schoolie’, and he was brought along to work on the changes needed to the curriculum that the Royal Navy used in training, to make sure that the “new learning” was provided for them.
The “Schoolies” branch of the Royal Navy, which dealt with initial and on-going training, was expanding to meet the expansion of the wartime navy. Whyte, with Weatherall’s supervision, worked out a course at the University of Bristol, at which the advances in the physical sciences were taught. The cover story was that the Government had put together a secret committee of academics in the 1930’s, with the possibility of war looming, to advance British science. This secrecy was the reason that no academic articles had been published. The work of this committee, “The Bristol Group” was now to be used to win the war by beating the Germans scientifically, and to make Great Britain the world leader in science and industry.
Over the last six months every Bristol Group man with a degree, especially those with Masters, and there were a couple with Doctorates, had been fully debriefed by a teams of experts on what they knew. Some of the men had taken to calling this the “Manhattan Project” due to the explosive nature of forty years of scientific advances being dropped into academia. It would take some years to work through everything, but there was plenty of material to train the Schoolies in the basics. One effect of this was to increase the time of basic training. While the number of new ships being launched and commissioned was increasing, there was enough time to add a week to the various courses. This meant that when the new recruits, or cadet officers, went on to their specialised courses, they were better prepared. The production of little booklets to enable the schoolies to give lectures on all manner of subjects were a priority.
Mike Cowley and David Watson did a similar job with the engineering branch and executive branch respectively. Commander Cowley worked out of Keyham College. While most of the engineers would continue to work on steam plants, a certain percentage were given further training in gas turbines, these in turn would become instructors in due course. Watson worked with the staff at Greenwich, under the command of Captain John Davis to try to learn the lessons of naval warfare from what might and might not happen.
5 August 1940. The Admiralty. London.
Captain Steven Johnston, former captain of HMS Minerva, had been put into the committee looking at future building plans for the Royal Navy. Johnston had an almost encyclopaedic knowledge of the ships of the Royal Navy. His father had been a keen model builder and had shared his enthusiasm with his son. His father was currently commanding HMS Charleston, unaware that his future son was anxiously watching for any report on that particular ship.
The discussion this particular day was the 1941 and 1942 Naval Building Programme. The 1939 and 1940 Emergency War Programme had concentrated on destroyers and other escort vessels. In September 1939, at the outbreak of war, it was expected that 213 warships (264,000 tons) would be completed within a year. By July 1940 only 105 ships (130,000 tons) had been completed. The Ministry of Supply was keen on keeping the ability to build 1.2 million gross tons of merchant shipping per year, in addition to the naval programme. With the reduced threat of the German navy in general and its U-boats in particular, the Admiralty had a chance to consider what it needed in both the short and long term.
In the short term, the first thing identified was that it was crucial to improve the ship building industry itself. Too many builders suffered from general obsolescence. A survey had been done in February 1940 and found that in the shipyards' machine tools, heavy plant, especially cranes and power supplies, were generally deficient, and provisions for welding were very meagre. Most of the marine engineers worked with old machines; a large proportion were twenty to thirty years old, working at speeds in wartime for which they were not designed. The technical processes, especially in coppersmiths' and blacksmiths' shops, were slow and old-fashioned.
All these facts were well known both in the industry and in the Admiralty. The pressure of immediate production tasks had left the firms no time to do a comprehensive survey and undertake drastic reform. In any case, their capital resources wouldn’t enable them to embark on a wholesale reconstruction out of their own means. If the admiralty wanted better ships, they would to have to help the industry to get better. This would hopefully have the secondary effect of keeping Great Britain as a premier ship-building nation into the future.
A rolling programme of improvements were being implemented, with a large emphasis on welding techniques and tools. Prefabrication and assembly line style construction were being promoted, often resisted by the workforce. The need to maintain a balanced output was noted. Too much emphasis on one type of vessel all too often slowed rather than quickened production as bottlenecks were experienced. Engines, turbines, guns, fire control systems, damage control, electronics (especially with the decision to move to an AC system in future builds) were all areas where industry was still gearing up. These bottlenecks halted production while crucial equipment wasn’t available. This problem could only be dealt with by a well-planned and organised system. The number of conversions of older ships, as well as the vast increase in number of escorts ordered, had thrown the shipyards into a panic. While some of these escorts had been cancelled in the first few months of 1940, there were still many on the slips awaiting completion.
In the longer term the Admiralty had its “two power” target. This was the ability to take on two powers at the same time. Leaving aside the American fleet which was an unlikely foe, and presuming the cooperation of the French fleet in the Mediterranean, which balanced the Italian fleet, that left Germany and Japan. The Kriegsmarine had been sorely wounded in the first half of 1940. It was bottled up in the Baltic, and just the two battleships, Bismark and Tirpitz were thought of as a threat when they came into operation. The arrival of the first three King George V class battleships would keep the balance. The U-boat menace still had to be taken into account, even though it was currently curtailed. The Japanese were building up a powerful navy with a few very powerful battleships, but focussed on the aircraft carrier.
The five King George Vs had all been launched in 1940. The lead ship, KGV itself, would join the fleet in October, the rest would follow, two in 1941, two in 1942. With four Revenge and five Queen Elizabeth class battleships, three battlecruisers, and Nelson and Rodney, the battle line was currently very strong. Two Lion class battleships had been laid down in 1939, and work was continuing on them, though without haste. There was no chance that these would be delivered before 1943 at the earliest, and therefore changes to their design were being considered.
Firstly, knowing the Mark II 16-inch guns would be a bottleneck, the Admiralty was prepared to accept delivery of the two Lion Class battleships to be put back to 1944/5. The Bristol Group had supplied the information that HMS Rodney’s 16-inch guns had played a large part in the destruction of the Bismark in Bristol’s time line. They also took into account the decision of the Americans to go with 16-inch guns on their future battleships. This convinced the admirals that 16-inch guns was the right choice. HMS Lion and Temeraire would have a dual purpose secondary battery of 5.25 inch twin mounts and a large number of Bofors 40mm AAA. They would carry no aircraft, but room for a helicopter to land was considered. Improvements to their propulsion, bow and stern would give them at least 30 knots, though 33 knots was the goal. They would be designed to carry more fuel to extend their range, important if they were working in the Pacific.
Johnston, like the rest of the Bristol Group men, argued long and hard that the days of the battleship were over. The battleship admirals focussed on the intelligence that the Americans decided to recommission four of their battleships for service in the 1980s. Obviously this proved that the battleship still had a place in future warfare. The Admiralty wanted to end the current war with modern battleships. If the Revenge and Queen Elizabeth Classes were scrapped after the war, then five KGVs and two Lions would provide a gun line well into the sixties. Captain Johnston made a mental note to have a word with Alan Grose before Churchill would see these plans. If Churchill could be persuaded to cut the Lion Class down even to one, that would help.
The Illustrious class aircraft carriers: HMS Illustrious, Formidable, Victorious, Indomitable were all being brought into service as planned. HMS Victorious and Indomitable, joining the fleet in 1941, were being completed with only minor improvements so as not to delay their introduction. HMS Unicorn would act as depot ship as planned. HMS Implacable and Indefatigable, were being redesigned as transitional ships, proving the new ideas of angled flight deck, deck edge lift and steam catapults. They were due to be commissioned in 1943/4, and hopefully be ready for the first generation of jet aircraft. The decision was made that the Audacious class carriers wouldn’t be ordered. Instead, two Malta Class aircraft carriers would be laid down, one in 1941 and one in 1942. These should be delivered in 1944 and 1945. The Malta Class at 50000 tons would be the recipients of as much new technology in their construction and propulsion as possible. There would be an expectation that they would be in service for at least forty years.
As the Illustrious and Implacable Class carriers came into service, the older, smaller aircraft carriers (Argus, Furious and Glorious) would be decommissioned. Johnston noted that without the Lions, another Malta could be built, possibly two.
There were seven Rapana class MACs being converted. This hybrid of a tanker and aircraft carrier would be useful for convoy protection, but they were otherwise too limited, especially without hanger facilities. There were high hopes that the Wessex type helicopters, designed for ASW warfare would provide convoys with all the air cover they would need, especially as the U-boat menace was curtailed. Large merchant men would be far more easily adapted to carry helicopters than fixed wing aircraft, as RFA Olna showed.
The Admiralty still felt a need for light carriers to supplement the fleet carriers. The debate on this raged for some time. The argument came down to a choice between a 14000 tons Majestic Class and a 22000 tons Centaur Class. Those in favour of the Majestic Class argued that it could be built more quickly and cheaply, but were countered with the fact that they would have a limited service life. The Centaur Class was bigger, and more expensive, and with a longer service life be better value for money. This was countered with the fact that more Majestics could be built for the same price of the Centaurs. The decision was to propose building four Centaurs and two Maltas, which for the next forty years was considered the better investment. It was hoped that some of the Dominions might be interested in a Centaur Class ships. The recommendation was to lay down two in 1941, to be delivered in 1943/4, with another two in 1942 for delivery in 1944/5.
Johnston made another note to talk to Grose about. The French were building Richelieu class battleships, the Richelieu currently on her way to the Far East and the Jean Bart almost completed. They had just started two more, the Clemenceau and Gascogne, and were talking about two Alsace class ships, very like the Lions after those. The Joffre aircraft carrier was 20% built and the Painlevé was on order. It might be worth a conversation about building one of the Alsace (with appropriate modifications) for the Royal Navy instead of the Lion Class, if the battleship admirals were adamant. In exchange, British shipyards could build either a Centaur or Malta Class for the Marine National. His mind wondered to other ideas. Perhaps we could sell the French the last two Illustrious Class, in the hope of two more Centaurs in their place. He honestly didn’t think anyone would go for it, but it was another idea worth considering.
The program would see the building of seven cruisers per year. The current program of Dido, Fiji and Abdiel class cruisers could be succeeded by Tiger class ships in 1941 and 1942, if the design could be finalised. The plan for Destroyers was for them to be built at a rate of 16 per year. The current J, K, L, M and N Classes under construction or near completion might be succeeded by something akin to the Battle class destroyers in 1941 and 1942. The War Emergency Programme Destroyers (O, P, Q & R classes) that had been laid down, as far as possible, will be converted to Type 15 Frigates. Hunt class destroyer-escorts that have not yet been laid down should be cancelled. The current escort vessels, mostly Flower class corvettes, would be cancelled unless too far into construction. Many of these would become “gunboats” in the colonies rather than trying to shepherd convoys across the Atlantic, for which they were quite unsuited. Black Swan sloops under construction would be completed, but their convoy escort role would be taken over eventually by the Type 15 Frigates.
The Ton Class minesweeper production was confirmed, replacing the all the Bangor Class that haven’t been started. Johnston was happy to see Paul Canter’s work was coming to fruition. The Algerine Class would also be put into production.
There were a few new types of vessels that would also be ordered into production. The size of an amphibious landing like the D-Day described by the Bristol Group would be unlikely. Currently there was serious lack of any kind of specialised amphibious ships. Landing Ship Docks, based on HMS Fearless of the Falklands task force, and Logistic Landing Ships like Sir Galahad should be designed and built. It was envisioned that they would need enough ships to be able to land a division of troops ashore with all their equipment. The idea of a purpose-built commando carrier for Helicopter operations, would be given further consideration, perhaps based on the same model as the Unicorn.
The second group of vessels that were planned was an expansion of the Royal Fleet Auxiliary. RFA Olna had opened the eyes of the Admiralty to what was called a Fleet Train. This hadn’t been seen as necessary, the Royal Navy was blessed with the provision of plenty of bases all over the world. The fact that replenishment vessels could keep the level of operations at a higher tempo for longer was understood as a force multiplier. So, with the help of the RFA officers and men who had served on various vessels, a number of designs would be drawn up. Large fleet tankers, fleet replenishment ships, store support ships, were some of the ideas that would need to be explored.
The Admiralty hoped that by 1944 the Royal Navy would be a modern, balanced fleet. The wartime expansion of the navy would not be as great as in the Bristol Group timeline, for they had already won the greatest battle of that war, the Battle of the Atlantic. It was now extremely unlikely to happen the way it had. War, if it were to break out in the Mediterranean and Pacific, would no doubt be very different to what the Bristol Group’s history looked like. There were plenty of men in Admiralty who wanted to make sure that the Royal Navy would still be the premier navy of the world in 1945 and beyond.
6 August 1940. HMS Dido. The Irish Sea.
The new 5.25-inch dual purpose guns were being tested on HMS Dido which was working up towards commission. These new weapons were being fitted on the Dido Class of cruisers and as the secondary armament in the KGV battleships. With an expected rate of fire of 10-12 rounds per minute, the reality was very different. The cramped conditions of the turret, the heavy weight of the shell and cartridge, and the fuze setter meant that at best seven or eight rounds were all the crews could manage.
The crews were rested after their exertions and a team of boffins appeared with a number of experimental shells. These were the first VT, or proximity fuzes, in artillery ammunition that Pye had been working on. The test involved barrage balloons from which were suspended various targets. The sailors manned their guns, with the new shells they were instructed to fire only one aimed shell per gun at 30 second intervals so that the boffins could note the effects. The first ten shells scored a 5% hit rate. The second ten was about the same, slightly better. The third ten was only about 2%. There were only twenty shells left, and the sailors manning the guns were asked to fire them as standard. So in three turrets, the six guns had one shell each. In less than ten seconds all the shells were fired off, with a 4% hit rate. To the sailors surprise, the boffins went away quite happy, they had learned a great deal in this test.
6 August 1940. Bletchley Park.
Commander Alastair Denniston, operational head of GC&CS at Bletchley Park explained what was happening to his superior. “Either the Germans are getting wise to us, or it could be just a coincidence, but it looks like they are all moving to a four rotor enigma. I wouldn’t be surprised if it is just a normal improvement cycle, but the fact that we have been reading their mail must have at least have occurred to them. We knew that this might happen, and we have had plans in place for just such a contingency. Realistically, we have to consider that we might be blind for at least a few weeks.”
As a consequence, a signal was sent all Entente units – “Possible enemy action expected. Highest readiness. Ends”
6 August 1940. Meaux, France
The flash message warning of possible enemy action meant that all the modified Spitfires of No. 212 (Photographic Reconnaissance) Squadron, were sent off to photograph the length and breadth of the German lines, looking for any sign of an impending attack. Two to three hours later they landed and their cameras were quickly processed to get the film to the Central Interpretation Unit, based in a chateaux on the outskirts of Paris.
The main CIU was back in Medmenham in England, but it took too long to get the film back to there and then bring the intelligence back to France. Some of the staff of photo interpreters were brought over to do their work in closer partnership with the Entente’s intelligence headquarters. Sarah Oliver was on duty when the film from 212 squadron’s flights arrived. Comparing the previous photographs with those that were just developed, the WAAF, like the rest of her team, looked for any changes that would provide the clues to German intentions.
For the last two months the remnant of Panzer Group Kleist had been regrouping and rebuilding near Koln. This had been under pretty constant aerial surveillance, and occasional air attack. Oliver compared the new and old photographs of this area first. If the Panzer force was on the move, then it be a sure sign that the Germans were up to something. Looking at the new photographs it was obvious that they had moved, so the next question was where? It was going to be a long day to track them down.
6 August 1940. Mons, Belgium.
20th Armoured Brigade (CO Evelyn Fanshawe) had been brought over to Belgium at the end of July with their mixture of new Valentines, A10s and A13mkII Cruiser tanks. The 1st Royal Gloucestershire Hussars (Valentines), and 1st and 2nd Northamptonshire Yeomanry (A10s & A13s) made up the Brigade. It was decided to add 20th Armoured Brigade to the First Army Tank Brigade (renamed as 11th Armoured Brigade, CO Douglas Pratt) to create the Second Armoured Division in Belgium. The infantry element, was to be provided by the 56th (London) Division, which gave up the 168th Brigade (OC Brigadier Guy Portman). This Brigade was the first to be fully equipped with the new Militant battle taxis and the 6-pdr anti-tank gun. 2nd Armoured Division, commanded by General Justice Tilly, had only had a few days together when the alert notice was given.
General Claude Auchinleck, the new commander of First Army decided that 2nd Armoured would replace 48th Division in I Corps. Newly promoted General Somerset would take 48th Division into GHQ reserve. 1st and 2nd Infantry Division, with 2nd Armoured Division would be a very strong Corps. General Auchinleck had high hopes for them. With the threat of ‘the balloon going up’ again, Auchinleck and Franklyn, (I Corps commander) decided to leave 2nd Armoured Division at Mons. If anything did happen, they were in a good position to come forward if they were needed.
General Tilly had been one of the chief instructors at Bovington before the war, and like Hobart, was a keen proponent of armoured warfare. He had read the reports on the fighting in May and he had spent a good amount of time talking to Douglas Pratt (OC 11th Armoured Brigade) who had been at the forefront of it. Tilly wanted to try out something which he described as quite German. 2nd Armoured Division was made up of five armoured battalions or regiments, one reconnaissance regiment (in light tanks), three infantry battalions, along with artillery (field, anti-tank and anti-aircraft), engineers and all the other support arms. He organised the division into “Battle Groups (BG).” Each group would have a mixture of tanks (including reconnaissance), infantry, artillery (all three types) and engineers. Tilly kept the traditional triangular structure. If fighting together, the Division would have three BGs, each the equivalent of a Brigade. Each Battle Group would likewise be made up of three battalion sized BGs, and these in turn would be made up of three or four squadron or company sized BGs.
The British army had very limited training in such a scheme, and so the first and most important job that Tilly had to master was getting the officers who would be fighting together to stop fighting among themselves. The keys to success were training and communications. The greater availability of radios helped with the later, though 48th Division felt aggrieved when they lost many of theirs to the new unit. For the former, training, training, training was the order of the day, and with a missing panzer group somewhere on the loose, Tilly worked himself and his men relentlessly.
7 August 1940. The Admiralty. London, England.
The Naval Air Service, or Fleet Air Arm as it liked to call itself, was still in transition. Having been handed back to the Royal Navy from the RAF in 1937, it had been starved of aircraft by the Air Ministry. Had it been handed back in 1934 as some had argued, its position would have been far stronger. However, that wasn’t what happened. The arrival of the Bristol group, with a good number of Fleet Air Arm personnel, had focused the minds of those in charge and led to this meeting, which was finalising its future orders of aircraft.
With three more Illustrious class carriers arriving in the fleet in fairly short order, with more carriers to follow in 1943, this meeting was to think through the aircraft that would provide the best air groups for the carriers. Currently Sea Hurricanes had been rushed into operation to replace the Gladiators that had formed the fighter squadrons. This was certainly an improvement over the biplanes, but still left a lot to be desired. The version of the SeaHurricane that were being produced were powered by Merlin 45 engines, carried four 20mm cannon armament, and all the accoutrements of a naval fighter. The feedback from pilots was favourable, but it wasn’t going to be the fighter of the future.
Just arrived in service were the first Fairey Fulmers, which had been designed as an interim fighter anyway. The Fulmers could prove useful as a reconnaissance aircraft, with its observer and long range. But as a fighter it was judged sadly lacking, despite the aerodynamic tweaks to give it better performance. Giving it a Griffon engine, like the Firefly might be an improvement, but it still didn’t look the part. The belief that Fleet Air Arm planes needed two crew to do the job had not been borne out. There were now better navigational aids available to help pilots return to the carrier. The size of the Fulmer was judged good for carrying radars of one kind or another. The trials with a Wellington AEW aircraft were being watched carefully by the Navy, and the Fulmer was being considered as a test bed to provide AEW for the carriers. The current order for 127 aircraft would be fulfilled, but not increased. Three Firefly prototypes were ordered from Fairey.
There was some debate about attempting to move to a Seafire. The new Mk II Spitfire was coming into service with the RAF could be adapted for carrier use. There were problems with the idea, the Spitfire's lack of range, coupled with a long nose and narrow, and flimsy, undercarriage, made it less than perfect for carrier use. Design work had been done on producing a folding wing version of the Spitfire in 1939 and early 1940. Westland and Cunliffe-Owen had been invited to look at doing this with the Mark II. It was clear that there was a need to plumb the aircraft to take drop tanks to extend its range. Modifications to the landing gear would have to made if it was ever going to be robust enough for flight deck operations. Some good work was being done with the Oleo pneumatic landing gear found in the Bristol Group's helicopters. This would be looked at to see if it was transferable to a SeaFire's undercarriage. If this went well, the consensus was that this should be produced to replace the Sea Hurricane. To equip the fighter squadrons through 1941 and into 1942 500 of the type would need to be ordered.
Hawker’s chief designer Sydney Cam was working on two new aircraft, one piston and one jet. The piston engined Tempest would replace the Hurribombers that had been doing such sterling work. The Tempest would have the Hercules III initially until the new Bristol Centaurus engines were available in 1941. It was felt that a radial engine was better for ground attack aircraft than the inline Merlins. The Sea Tempest would be evaluated, and hopefully be more like a Sea Fury when produced, so three prototypes were ordered for evaluation. If successful 200 of these would be ordered initially, growing to 600+ if it was a suitable replacement for the SeaFire.
Cam’s work on a Hunter, and a navalised SeaHunter, was dependant on Rolls Royce work on getting the Avon jet engine to a satisfactory level. There was no sign of this appearing until at least 1942, but hopefully when the Implacable and Indefatigable were commissioned there would jet aircraft for them to carry.
The Swordfish were the back bone of the 18 torpedo squadrons and were being upgraded with a more powerful engine, enclosed cockpit, ASW radar etc. These would serve until the Barracuda would be ready. The prototype had shown that there would have to some changes to it, including fitting the Merlin 45. Realistically it would need the Griffon engine to really give it the power it needed. The Barracuda would have three roles: the classic torpedo bomber, a submarine hunter, and the platform for a new anti-ship glide bomb that was being developed. 500 Barracudas would be needed.
The Skua was still being used as a dive bomber, and it had some limited success. The last Skua had been delivered in 1939. Retrofitting one of these with a bigger engine was attempted, but for little reward. To replace the Skua there were three British contenders. Hawker were promoting their Henley, though half-heartedly, their order books were already full. There was a new design from Boulton Paul which was basically a redesigned Defiant for carrier use and for dive bombing. Martin-Baker’s design, based around their MB2, which they called the Cormorant dive bomber, was also being looked at, using a Hercules engine. The French were experimenting with the LN42, powered by a Merlin 45, and that was a contender for the task too. Until a real contender came forward, the Skua would need to soldier on. Prototypes of the Boulton Paul, the Martin Baker and the LN42 were ordered for assessment.
8 August 1940. Central Interpretation Unit, Paris. France
The disappearance of Panzer Group Kleist had been the subject of all-out effort by intelligence, photoreconnaissance and photo-interpretation. Sarah Oliver, one of the WAAFs, finally made the breakthrough. One of the Spitfires from 212 Squadron had gone further afield as the search continued, and combination of good flying, good weather and good luck had found the panzers at Bergen training area near Celle. The photographs showed that they were involved in what looked like a large exercise. From this it was speculated, that having been rebuilt in the Koln area, they were now undergoing fresh training.
Further flights (at the cost of three lost Spitfires) managed to put some meat on to these bones. From what could be seen, the Panzers were nearly all IIIs and IVs, some IIs were found, but by the accompanying vehicles, probably only in reconnaissance units. There also seemed to be a lot more infantry around than would have been expected from just the Panzer and Motorised Infantry Divisions exercising together.
The order then went out to all Entente forces that they could reduce their threat level, and the RAF and AdA were asked about paying a visit to the exercise some night, just to help with its realism. The RAF’s own reconnaissance of the area suggested that there was very little likelihood of hitting anything significant. The Germans seemed not to be concentrated anywhere, almost as if they were expecting such an air raid. The RAF would prefer continuing attacks on enemy airfields and transport hubs. The AdA likewise didn’t feel it was a worthwhile target, and would continue to support the army along the Meuse and interdict German supplies moving to the front.
9 August 1940. Reusel. Holland.
Gun Sergeant John Foxwell and his team were running through the drills again. His brand new 25-pdr gun had been delivered two weeks ago, and every member of ‘C’ Troop 9/17 Battery, and indeed all of 7th Field Regiment were learning all about their new weapons. The other two 3rd Infantry Division’s RA regiments (3rd & 76th) had also received the new guns. The factories at home were producing over a hundred guns a month, with new factories being opened that number was about to rise to 200 per month. Each Infantry Division needed 72 of them, so the more that could be produced the better.
Foxwell, as the Gun Sergeant, was No 1, the detachment commander. No 2 operated the breech and rammed the shell. No 3 was the gun layer, No 4 loaded the brass cartridge propelling charge, No 5 brought the ammunition to the gun. No 6, Corporal Andy Kennedy, as second in command, was responsible for preparing the ammunition and operating the fuze indicator. Over the last few days, Foxwell had ran the drills with each member of the crew taking a different part, so that if anyone was unable to fulfil their assigned role, the gun could continue operating. They knew they could keep up the intense rate of fire (5 rpm) for a short time with five men, the rapid rate of fire (4rpm) with four. Once the crew was down to three, they would only manage a slow (2 rpm) rate. But each member of the crew could now act in each job, and Foxwell was happy with that.
Under normal circumstances though he had Gunner Adam Boyd in the No 5 role, as he was the biggest lad, and found carrying the ammunition least tiring. Gunner Bill Sinclair was normally No 2, as he was the most dexterous, he found opening the breech and ramming home the shell to be straightforward. Gunner Peter Walker (acting as No 3), who excelled as the gun layer but always struggled with the operating the breech for some reason. Gunner Roger Fleming (No 4) had a good rhythm going with Bill Sinclair, so that the shell and the charge were rammed home in jig time. Corporal Andy Kennedy was solid as a rock and had good hands for getting the fuzes set correctly. Altogether, Foxwell thought he probably had the best team in the battery, if not the Regiment.
His confidence in his men was soon to be put to the test. 3rd Division’s new artillery were going to have their first full Division live fire exercise. The plan was to move from their current position to another about a mile north, and then rain down hell on a large lake called Het Goorven. Interestingly they were accompanied by 17th Field Company Royal Engineers, who would be testing out some of their new equipment. They called them JCBs, though nobody could figure out what JCB stood for. It was a new kind of tractor with a loader scoop in the front and a backhoe at the back. The tractor itself was based on the David Brown Aircraft tractor, with a more powerful engine. It had an enclosed cab which was partly armoured.
At the appointed hour Foxwell supervised the hitching of the 25-pdr to the ammunition trailer (Trailer, Artillery, No 27), the driver reversed the Morris Quad 4x4 artillery tractor and the trailer was quickly hitched to the tractor, the crew jumped aboard and, keeping a proper distance from the other vehicles in the battery, followed Captain Riddel’s vehicle. When they reached the new battery position, while Foxwell and the crew were unhitching the gun and trailer, the Royal Engineers quickly dug out a gun position with the back hoe, smoothing out the soil with the front loader. Foxwell got the gun into position and he was the first in the battery to signal “ready to fire”. In due course, the target was announced, with range and bearing, then came the order: intense fire. Seventy-two guns barked in unison, corrections were given by the observer, and the Division’s guns fired off five rounds in a minute, before the order to cease fire was given.
The rush was then on to limber up again and move to a secondary position, once more prepared by the Engineers, and do it all again. This was done as efficiently as possible. When they had finished, they were given the all clear from the exercise, and a “well done” from the Divisional commander as well as the Regimental commander. Foxwell got the men onto to cleaning the gun and refilling the ready locker. They could rest and have a brew when the work was done to his satisfaction.
9 August 1940. Defence Committee of the War Cabinet. Whitehall. London
Winston Churchill: Gentlemen, the Third Lord of the Admiralty has presented the plans for the 1941 and 1942 building programme for the Royal Navy for our approval. What do you make of it Admiral Grose?
Vice-Admiral Alan Grose: Prime Minister a great deal of work has gone into it, and regarding the escort vessels and other smaller vessels it is fine. Regarding the Battle destroyers, I think that three or four flotillas a year would be better than two. Each of the new carriers will likely need at least one flotilla with it. As you know, the increase in aircraft carriers, both in number and in size will be the most important for our long term security. Having only two of a particular type of aircraft carrier is problematic because of the need for maintenance and refit cycles could leave you without an available carrier when you most need it. The two Centaurs and one Malta proposed for each of the two years is going to leave us short.
My advice, from experience, is that we should aim to have three Centaurs each of the two years, and in 1941 two Malta sized vessels, and one, but preferably two the following year. I realise that might seem excessive, but you need to think about Home fleet, the Mediterranean and Indian Ocean fleets and the East Indies. Four large carriers lets you have two or three at these stations at any one time, supported by at least one Centaur and either an Illustrious or Implacable. That gives the fleet commanders a potent defensive and, crucially, offensive capability.
Obviously something has to give, and as you know in my history the Lion class battleships were never built, it was clear by 1942 that building battleships would be irrelevant. We will soon have five modern KGVs that should have a service life of up to thirty years if we need them. These are all going to have vastly improved anti-aircraft weaponry, as well as excellent radar and fire control systems that will give them edge in any possible fight.
The Graf Spee and Royal Oak were lost to torpedoes without any warning. Give the navy a good balance of submarines, aircraft carriers protected by good ASW escorts, with a few battleships for command and control, heavy anti-aircraft weaponry and shore bombardment, and Britannia will continue to rule the waves for the foreseeable future.
Winston Churchill: What about the Vanguard? Surely it is worth proceeding with that, even two of them?
Grose: The question Prime Minister is about resources. While the 15-inch guns are lying around and that would hasten the building process, so much steel and labour would be put into a Vanguard, which would be better employed in destroyers and frigates. Why not put the 15-inch guns in Gibraltar, Malta and Singapore? That will raise the morale of those three crucial ports. If it was me, carry on working on the 16-inch guns for Lions, so that in 1944 or 1945, if it looks like we’ll have to make up for losses or replace some of the older battlewagons, then consider building the Lions or Vanguards then. Send the Hood off for a major refit and that will keep her going well into the 1950s.
Winston Churchill: You are asking for a great deal of faith in you, Admiral. If the Americans ask why we’ve stopped building battleships, when they have these massive Iowa class ships ordered, what should we tell them? ‘They are a waste of resources?’ The new Italian battleships, the Soviets are proposing new battleships, or these monstrous Japanese ships, even the French are still building battleships, but the Royal Navy, alone among the great naval powers, have ditched the queen of the seas!
Grose: Prime Minister may I remind you of the briefing papers you have been given of how history worked out regarding the demise of the battleship as the queen of the seas. The Italian battleships were attacked by biplanes from Royal Navy carriers and either sunk or withdrawn. The Japanese monsters were sunk by airpower alone. The American Pacific fleet was devastated by Japanese aircraft from carriers, who learned how to do it from us. The German fleet is already kaput, and the remnant are currently hiding in the Baltic. The Soviets can be bottled up easily. Even our own losses in heavies from my history – Barham and Royal Oak sunk by submarine launched torpedoes, Prince of Wales and Repulse sunk by air launched torpedoes, the monitor Terror sunk by damage caused by divebombers, only the Hood was sunk by direct fire from another ship, the Bismark. The main aircraft carriers that were lost, HMS Eagle, Courageous and Ark Royal were all down to submarines, Hermes to a Japanese air attack. Only HMS Glorious was lost to enemy surface action that was an appalling failure on the part of her Captain.
So we need good AAA on all vessels, good ASW protection for our heavies and carriers, and good aircraft to defend the carrier task forces. Concentrate on these three priorities and we’ll do well.
Churchill: I know, you’ve told me all this so many times, but there is just something about a battleship that nothing else can match.
First Sea Lord Dudley Pound: I love a battleship as much as the next man, Prime Minister, and it would seem that so do many of my colleagues, especially in the Third Sea Lord’s department. Perhaps Bruce Fraser felt he had to keep the battleship men happy after Reginald Henderson’s emphasis on carriers. However, I would agree with Grose, and leave the battleships off the list until 1943 or 1944, when we can look at them again. If were to lose a couple of the carriers, especially the newer ones, we’d be hamstrung. I would cancel the Lions and the Vanguard, and let’s have 6 Centaurs and 4 Malta class instead. Ditto, the Submarines, give me a fleet of Onyx diesel-electric boats, and nobody will be able to take us on. If the Americans say anything, just remind them that the Royal Navy is always at the cutting edge of development of naval warfare.
Churchill: Even I can see the writing on the wall. Let it be then, though don’t think I’ll forget about the battleships come 1943. As the First Sea Lord says, increase the carriers, submarines and destroyers, cancel the battleships altogether at this point and free up the slipways. We won’t cancel work on the 16-inch guns just in case. Go ahead also with the amphibious capability, I like the idea of these hovercraft thingies.
9 August 1940 Alfred Herbert Company (Machine Tool Manufacturer). Coventry.
Production Manager: Mr Herbert there’s a bit of a problem on the shop floor that you really ought to know about, sir.
Alfred Herbert (Chairman of the company): It’s about the women, isn’t it?
PM: Yes sir, it is. The chief shop steward has ordered the men to down tools until, and I quote, “the lassies go back to making tea and typing, which is all they’re good for”. Then he added some other things that were quite lewd and embarrassed the girls no end. They’ve walked out too, they’re not prepared to take that kind of smutty talk they said.
AH: That man’s a bloody communist too, so much for the rights of workers. Right, bring him in here, and we’ll have this out, one way or another. (Picks up telephone)…
Chief Shop Steward: “Mr Herbert, you will not be diluting the skilled workers in this plant with these unskilled women. How do you imagine an eight week course makes someone a “machinist”? Apprentices should learn the trade from the ground up and then become “skilled men.” These women are no more than scabs, brought in to break the union and bring wages down and your profits up.”
AH: Are you quite aware of the priority for getting these machine tools out to the tank manufacturers, so that our boys at the front can take on the Nazis? You realise, that if our order is not fulfilled on time, not only is there a financial penalty, but very serious questions will be asked about “sabotaging the war effort” and “supporting the enemy in time of war”?
CSS: This imperialist war is nothing more than a “get rich quick” scheme for capital; the workers are either called up as cannon fodder or stitched up to work longer hours for less pay.
AH: You know perfectly well that wages have increased since the war began, and the women are being paid as unskilled workers to keep your members happy. Now, either your members get back to work, and are civil and polite to our new members of staff, or we will have to explain this to the Controller General at the Ministry of Supply.
CSS: You go ahead and run to the government, my workers will not be diluted by a bunch of women.
AH: Very well, if that it is how it is, we shall leave it there, for the moment. (Picks up phone as CSS leaves).
10 August 1940. Alfred Herbert Company (Machine Tool Manufacturer). Coventry.
Tannoy announcement: All employees will report immediately to the cafeteria. I repeat, all employees to the cafeteria.
General hubbub falls to silence as Albert Herbert comes to raised dais along with a police officer and a man from the Ministry of supply.
AH: “Ladies and Gentlemen. This gentleman is from the Ministry of Supply and would like to say a few words.”
MofS: “Thank you Mr Herbert. As you know your current order for machine tools is to build turret lathes for new tanks. Due to the nature of this order, and its importance I have the pleasure of reading the following letter: “Hardly any part of our common organisation of war production had been more thoroughly and precisely examined than the question of machine tools. Adequate supplies of machine tools are central to the whole question of industrial supply, and no one can be engaged in munitions production for one day without feeling that they were the ganglion nerve centre of the whole supply. In consequence, it is the earnest desire of the whole nation for victory that compels us to urge you on to the highest level of productivity, allowing nothing to hinder our efforts. Once more the women of Britain, as they did in the last war, have rolled up their sleeves and taken their men’s places at the work bench to arm those men to overcome our foe. They deserve nothing but respect and honour for doing their duty to King and country, just as their husbands and sons are doing their duty on land, at sea and in the sky. I anticipate that their arrival in your factory will be one more step on the road to victory. Yours sincerely. Winston Churchill, Prime Minister.”
Some of the workers clapped and cheered, led by the new women workers, others, wondering why the chief and other senior shop stewards weren’t present, but a policeman was, kept their hands folded.
AH: The Prime Minister himself has taken a personal interest in our company, and had intimated a desire to visit us when the pressures of office allow. Now, on a more negative note, Sergeant Black is here to inform us of some important information.
Sergeant Black: Ladies and Gentlemen, it has come to the attention of His Majesty’s Constabulary that there have been certain acts of sabotage, and even allegations of treason among the workforce here. (Audible intake of breath from the assembly). A number of arrests were made early this morning and some of your co-workers are helping us with enquiries. We hope this will all be resolved very soon, and that these allegations have no grounds. However, the Home Office have instructed us that any acts that harm productivity in essential industries are to be investigated most seriously and any saboteurs or anyone found guilty of aiding or abetting the enemy is to feel the full force of the law. That is all.
AH: Thank you Sergeant, I don’t think you could have made that any clearer. Now, with the Prime Minister taking personal interest in us completing our order in full and on time, the board have decided that, should we complete our order in full and ahead of schedule, a bonus will be paid to every worker. It is therefore in all our best interests to integrate our new workers as quickly as possible so that our men can have the tanks they need to take Berlin. (Fairly enthusiastic cheering from the majority of workers).
10 August 1940. Ministry of Supply. London
Official 1: So, did the carrot and stick work at Herberts?
Official 2: It seems to have done. A few other arrests have been made at other firms for similar “crimes”. Whoever came up with the idea of having the Prime Minister write those standard letters was a genius.
Official 3: I heard it was one of those men from Bristol.
Official 1: Really? Remember, “Loose lips sink ships”, and careers. Now, with that mini-crisis over, how are we doing overall for machine tools?
Official 3: We’ve been around all the small and medium sized engineering firms and have managed to organise them to either take in sub-contact work, or supply directly to users. This should increase overall production of machine tools by 33%. The established firms like Herberts, Churchill-Redman, Adcock & Shipley are all at full stretch, and productivity should rise as more workers, like the women in Coventry, make up manpower shortfalls. Should we still call it manpower if women work there too?
Official 2: Don’t start trying to confuse us. Does a man-eating tiger only eat men?
Official 3: The American imports of the tools we ordered in 1939 are still not fully delivered. Part of the shortfall is the Americans not fulfilling their contracts.
Official 2: It looks like the yanks are using the tools we bought and paid for to expand their own increase in manufacturing. No doubt we’ll get them eventually, but it is hardly cricket.
Official 3: I thought they played baseball over there, not cricket.
Official 1: (rolls eyes) It seems the French are complaining too. The joint purchasing team in Washington are kicking up a fuss. We are on target to have made 62000 machine tools from September 39 to 1940, that’s more than at any other time in our history. The shortfalls come from the loss of the German imports and the lateness of the American imports. We should have received 33000 from America, but only half of that has arrived. The target for next year is 81000 to be produced here, with 32000 imported from America.
Official 2: The other problem is spare parts. If something goes wrong with the American machines, we have to import replacement parts from the USA, with all the inherent problems that entails. We should be looking at some of the companies to duplicate the American machines so that we can be less dependent.
Official 3: Certainly, there are American machines, and German ones, that none of our companies make, especially some very specialised equipment. Though we might not want to open ourselves to charges of breaching patents law.
Official 1: Don’t you know there’s a war on? I’d rather face American lawyers than Gestapo goons.
10 August 1940. Ministry of Supply. Shell Mex House, The Strand. London.
Official 1: The loss of Denmark and Holland has meant that our butter, bacon and egg imports have fallen dramatically. Butter is down about 45%, bacon 75% and fresh eggs about the same. We’ve also lost 25% of our fresh or preserved vegetables.
Official 2: Fresh, preserved and tinned fruit are all fine. Beef and Lamb too are fine, almost unaffected.
Official 1: That’s all very well, but we can’t have an English breakfast without bacon and eggs. The home front’s efforts to reduce consumption and increase supply will help, but we are going to have to get these proteins from somewhere else, and that probably means the USA, which means more dollars.
Official 2: Canada is already providing a great deal of our grains, might they be persuaded to go into the pig and poultry business? What about the Republic of Ireland? Their imports will be struggling too, how are they going to cope?
Official 1: Not really out concern. Now, what’s next?
Official 3: Timber is a huge problem. Pit props for the mines, railway sleepers and sawn softwood for construction came mostly from the Baltic. That is all gone. The Forestry Commission think we have enough timber resources to meet the shortfall, but that will need many more workers.
Official 1: Didn’t women work in forestry in the Great War?
Official 2: Yes, the Women’s Timber Service if I remember correctly. I think it may need to be resurrected. The problem with importing from Canada or wherever is the sheer bulk. If Norway could ship it from its ports, that might solve some of the problems, but I agree, home produced should be prioritised.
Official 1: Is it just me, or is the problem with prioritising everything, just mean that everything just gets done at the same rate?
Official 2: Iron ore is fine, Sweden, Tunis, Algeria, France and Norway are all continuing to meet our needs, we’re paying a bit more for Swedish ores, but it is better quality and selling it us means it’s not available to the Germans. Belgium and France are providing some iron and steel, which is helping our own shortfall, but the new foundries should be ready next year.
Official 1: How are negotiations with the Turks going for metal ores?
Official 2: I believe the phrase is ‘poorly’.
Official 3: Oil next. The Norwegian fleet of tankers, plus our own is keeping the movement of oil from the Middle East at normal rates. The Suez Canal and Mediterranean routes are fine, so there’s no problem there. In terms of refining, we’re increasing production of 100+ octane petrol, and we are more than adequately meeting the RAF’s needs. We are going to have to increase the supply of diesel for a lot of these new engines that are coming into production.
Official 2: At least that is less dollars. Now exports. We don’t want the balance to trade to get too out of kilter.
Official 1: The first problem is munitions. We were the largest exporter of munitions before the war, but now so much of it is being used for ourselves, that is going to count against us. Secondly coal, which is fine, our biggest customer, France, still is buying it up in increased quantities. Third consumer goods. This is going to be a problem as much of manufacturing gears up for war. We really need a couple of inventions that we can make easily and break into the American market. Whiskey, linen goods, and the usual things will find themselves squeezed if we aren’t careful.
Official 2: What’s that phrase Winston has been using? “We don’t want to win the war and lose the peace.”
10 August 1940. Ministry of Labour. London
Official 1: In summary, from June 1939 and June 1940 the employable population increase was by 926,000 workers, of whom rather more than half were women. In addition, about 625,000 persons previously unemployed were taken into industrial employment or into the Armed Forces. Now the Forces and civil defence have called up two million more, but there is still some unemployment, and more women ready to enter the workforce. The problems are not so much a labour shortage, as shortage of particularly skilled workers at specific industries.
Official 2: Am I right in thinking that 44% of men and 73% of women are still employed in group III industries?
Official 1: Yes, but that is changing slowly, last June it was 49% and 77% respectively. It has to be said that these industries and services are important for the well-being of the civilian population. The 4% move in men was to the munitions industries (engineering and chemical) and the other 1% to things like shipping, transport, mining, agriculture, public services, etc.
Official 3: There are still likely to be some problems. Although the reserved occupations have meant that essential workers haven’t been called up to the Armed Forces, there have been a number of volunteers who have gone to the forces. There are a couple of collieries in Yorkshire and South Wales that have been left short of workers because of this.
Official 2: The armed forces do need skilled men too, you know.
Official 3: True, but if we continue with our current planned expansion, we run the risk of labour shortages, if not next year, then certainly in 1942.
Official 1: I’ll speak to Mr Bevin and see if we can look at ways of preventing that before it happens. We may have to have a conscription of men and women into industry as well as the armed forces.
Official 2: You can’t send women down the pits.
Official 1: No, but without coal there’s no power, and if there’s no power, there’s no production, and if there’s no production, there’s no victory. Maybe we need a regiment of miners.
Official 3: The National Union of Mineworkers would love that! The other problem is in the electronics sector. There has already been a large expansion in this area, and it looks like this will carry on. There is a severe lack of trained people. Pye, Metropolitan Vickers and Cossor are all screaming for new recruits. Each of the companies have a training programme that give the new employees an introduction to electronics, but it may be that this is something we should get involved with. Call it a Government Retraining Scheme. If we take people coming to the workplace for the first time, have something like a two-month course. Courses on electronics, precision engineering, welding, and so on. It means that the companies can get people onto the production line faster.
Official 2: Not a bad idea, but who provides the training?
Official 3: We could ask the firms themselves. They obviously are having to do it in-house anyway, so if three of four companies provided a few trainers, they would also get the benefits of first choices of the new intake. Academia might help, we could ask the universities for some lecturers to do some of the theoretical stuff. Trigonometry for engineers, that kind of thing. It would have to be regional of course. An educated workforce will become more and more essential.
Official 1: I like the idea, put it down on paper and I’ll take it to Mr Bevin.
Official 2: Can we move on to farming? I got a memo from the Ministry of Supply who are worried about imports of timber and some foodstuffs. They are suggesting we reinstate the Women’s Timber Service. Just when you mentioned a regiment of miners, we will need women to work on farms and in forestry as well as industry. A women’s land army perhaps?
Official 1: Likewise, give me idea on paper and I’ll show it to Mr Bevin. That’s a good name for it, Women’s Land Army. I suppose we’ll have to call the Women’s Timber Service something more martial, Women’s Timber Corps? Something like that. They’ll probably just be known as Timber Jills or something daft. Is that everything? I believe Doris might have some biscuits with the tea today, let’s get on before they’re all gone.
10 August 1940. Luftwaffe Headquarters. Berlin. Germany.
Goring was something of a new man in the last few months. After his terrible mistake in May, and the humiliation he had received, along with the humiliation of his beloved Luftwaffe, he had pulled himself together somewhat. He had lost some weight, was avoiding his “medicines” and was feeling the better for it. A degree of the pomposity was still evident, but he was certainly more lucid and focused.
The latest figures of aircraft production were being discussed. Over all types, 650 aircraft were being built per month. But that was a total of 20 different types, from reconnaissance to seaplanes, bomber to fighters. Over 230 bombers and fighters per month were being produced by the factories. The majority of bombers were Ju88s (150) and fighters Bf109s (130). The Ju88s were also being produced as reconnaissance and heavy fighter variants. Me110s were still being produced, though mostly for a night-fighter role. 50 Stukas were being built per month, but only 32 Ju52 transport planes, nowhere near enough to make up the losses in May.
Losses for the campaign in May and since numbered over 2200 aircraft to all causes. Pilots and aircrew losses were also a major concern, the reserves were thinning down quite fast. New pilot training wasn’t keeping pace with the need for replacements. All too often newly trained pilots were being thrown into the fray without adequate experience and taking disproportionate losses.
In terms of new aircraft the Bf 109F was nearly ready for production, the first squadrons expected to receive it for evaluation and transition next month, it should roll out to most squadrons in January. The Fw190 was expected to enter production in June 1941, pre-production models were being tested and there was still some debate about the wing size. Hopes to replace the Me110 with the Me210 were proving to be a costly failure, the prototypes were displaying very poor, if not dangerous flight characteristics. Likewise, the Henschel 129 ground attack aircraft was proving to be less than desirable. The Fw 189 reconnaissance aircraft was about to enter production, for service in 1941. The Dornier Do215, a longer range reconnaissance aircraft was about to equip its first squadron. The long-range bomber, Heinkel He177 was having terrible problems that probably wouldn’t be ironed out until 1942. Jets were being worked on by BMW and Junkers but progress was slow, mostly because of a lack of specialised metals.
Goring listened to all this with a feeling of despondency. The British had improved their Spitfire so that it now had a clear advantage over the Bf109E, and even the F would struggle against it. They had taken the Hurricane, a mediocre fighter and turned it into an excellent ground attack aircraft. The French seemed to be improving too, though less quickly, but the American aircraft they were using were quite good. Udet seemed to get nothing right, the aircraft industry was hamstrung for various reasons, not least chopping and changing specifications, especially about dive bombing which was Udet’s answer to everything. Too many poor designs were being touted and wasting resources. After what had happened in May, he couldn’t lie to Hitler again, even to tell him what he wanted to hear.
Goring interrupted Udet who was attempting to show that the Luftwaffe’s progress was clear and in the right direction. Goring made some simple choices. First cancel all further production of the Me110, and cancel the Me210 completely. All that production was to be transferred to the Bf109 and they had better be ready to improve it again next year. The Fw190 looked like a good aircraft and should be put into production as soon as possible. It looked like it might do a job similar to the Hurribomber, so Focke-Wolf were to make a ground attack version as well as a fighter. The Henschel 129 would be cancelled and production made available for the Fw190. The Ju88 was to be primary bomber. The Heinkel 111 would continue in production for now, but they had better get the He177 fixed and ready as soon as possible. Stukas were a failure and so production should cease, the Fw190 would do the job. The lack of transport aircraft was critical. Since Junkers were concentrating on the Ju88s, Dornier would take over from Junkers and build Ju52s.
Goring got up and walked out the room, the staff shocked at the drastic measures that they had just been handed. Udet ran to catch up with Goring to try to speak to him, but Goring dismissed him, “Go and do what I have said.”
11 August 1940 RNAS Yeovilton.
Frank Halford (Chief designer, Napier & Sons) and his team of engineers did the final checks on their copy of the gnome turboprop engines that were mated for the first test flight of the new Westland Helicopter they were calling the Sussex. It was copied from the Wessex, but there were enough differences that it really deserved another name. Like the Wildcat that had flown in June, the Sussex was simpler and slightly smaller than the aircraft it was copied from. If everything went well, the production models would be more sophisticated, but this prototype was just the flying machine.
Two Wessex HU5 had arrived back on the Olna, one had been used to train new pilots for the Fleet Air Arm, the other had been dismantled to be the design blueprint for the new aircraft that were copying it. For today’s first flight the Wessex pilot, David Salter, with greater experience on the Wessex was the main stick and Harald Penrose, Westland’s chief test pilot was co-pilot. Although it had been thoroughly checked over by everybody, still Salter and Penrose did a full walk around as a final check, after all it was their lives at risk. Clambering over the aircraft they checked oil levels, hatches properly closed and so on. Having completed the procedure, they put on their helmets (something of a novelty to Penrose) and Salter climbed up into the cockpit. Sliding the door shut, he adjusted the height of the seat, strapped himself in and fiddled with the pedals. In front of him were an array of switches, knobs and dials, so flicking on the battery switch, he checked the microphones with Penrose. “How do you read, Harald?” “Loud and clear”, “Loud and clear also.” “Ground power in please.” The ground crew plugged the lead from the battery kit into the side of the Sussex, just below the exhaust pipe.
Salter’s hands and eyes ran over the switches on the central console, preparing the electrics for start-up. Next came the radio check, the whole flight was being recorded in case anything went wrong. Salter had a good look over every dial, running from left to right. Engine gauges, fuel flow meters, torque, the flight instruments. With a waggle of the two sticks, cyclic in the right hand and collective in the left, a good kick on both pedals, he was ready to start.
“Starting port”, “Roger”. He pressed the starter button down and held it. Beneath Penrose’s feet the engine wound up slowly, while it waited for ignition, the ignition unit crackers brought the engine to life with a roar from the port exhaust. He had his hand over the fuel cut off in case the temperature went too high, but it rose rapidly and then dropped back as the increased airflow cooled things down. Increasing the throttle slightly the generators come on line, and Salter called for the ground power to be unplugged. Checking all was well, he then repeated the procedure for the starboard engine under his own feet.
Circling his finger in the air to the ground crew, who checked around, as seeing all was clear, gave the same signal back. “Engaging rotors” Salter engaged the rotors by easing the rotor brake off, checking it was locked off. The starboard engine was now driving the four rotors, so he moved the speed select lever slowly forward, the blades sped up. As the rotors reached flying speed, he put the port engine into drive, and advanced that speed lever too. Tweaking both levers to balance the fuel flow to the Gnome engines which were now taking equal strain.
A full check of the hydraulic system followed, so they were ready to take the helicopter on its first flight. Calling out the final pre-flight checks, he prepared for launch with a final adjustment of the friction in the collective lever. “X-Ray Lima now lifting off”. Gently easing up the collective lever, pushing his left foot forward slowly, the cyclic stick was gently pulled slightly left and back. They could feel the undercarriage starting to lift as the blades took the strain. Using the controls, he felt for the balance needed to keep the aircraft pointed straight and to lift it vertically. The starboard wheel left the ground, followed by the port, finally the tail wheel, as a little extra power on the collective helped them rise about the ground. He eased off the power then and hovered at fifteen feet to check once again that all the systems were working well. Once it was clear that everything was working normally, he applied more power and increased height to 200 feet. It was at this point that the red warning light on the panel started to flash. The tail rotor failed.
Salter was well practiced on autorotation. Rather than trying to do anything about the system, he knew he had about one second to dump the collective lever to prevent the rotor blades dragging and losing their speed. As they started to descent rapidly, he eased back on the cyclic to raise the nose and try to slow the rate of descent, giving the blades a bit of extra momentum as the wind through them increased. About 10 feet from the ground, he hauled on the collective lever to use all the remaining momentum to cushion the landing. The Sussex weighed the best part of six tons, so “cushion” the landing was a relative concept.
As soon as the chopper was stationary, they both unbuckled and jumped out as quickly as they could. Penrose noted afterwards that Salter had, probably without thinking about it, switched off all the fuel and power switches during their descent. There was still the danger of fire, but the aircraft had been saved by Salters extensive training. Penrose was sure that if he had been the pilot, it would not have ended as well. Although they had practiced for such an emergency, Salter did things on instinct that Penrose would have to think about, therefore taking longer.
The undercarriage was completely broken, taking the brunt of the crash, but otherwise the Sussex’s damage was minimal. The investigation found that a link to the rear rotor had sheared, causing the failure. All the links would have to be checked again, but it was found that this one was a failure in the casting, fatally weakening the metal. The company who produced the metal castings would have to be reproached and would have to put far better quality control measures into place.
The Sussex project was grounded for a month, though testing of other systems was continued. Production would probably have to be delayed, but no one was surprised that there should be delays. It was important that when they were delivered that they would be fit for purpose.
(The descripting of helicopter flying and emergency procedures in this update is largely taken from the book “Scram!”, by Harry Benson, Preface Publishing, London 2012)
12 August 1940. Office of Charles Hopkins. “Director of Naval Land Equipment.”
“Miss Sinclair, please take a letter:
For the attention of the Prime Minister.
Naval Land Equipment, Report of Progress No 11.
Since the last progress report, No 10, dated 12 July 1940, I note that work on the Cultivator No 6 has been downgraded in priority from the highest to 1(b), and that the number of machines on order has been reduced to thirty-three, from 240.
The two types of earth moving machines, or moles, narrow (infantry) and wide (officer), are currently awaiting the delivery of essential parts. The successful test of April 17 this year proved the ability of the rig to cut a trench over three feet wide and three feet six inches deep, which the finished machines will increase to a depth of five feet and seven and a half feet wide, moving at half a mile an hour. Our hope of having full working prototype is currently meeting with two main problems.
Ruston-Bucyrus of Lincoln, the firm which is designing the machines, and building the cutting section of the mole are progressing very well. However, what is hampering progress most of all is the inability to get a proper supply of armour and engines. On approaching the steel foundries, the 1(b) classification of the work means that the armour we need is currently being prioritised for the tank manufacturers. If the machines are to be effective, they will need to be very heavily protected, much more than the current infantry tanks. But we cannot make progress towards a prototype without access to armour. Even efforts to make a light steel prototype are hampered by the lack of priority.
I visited Rolls-Royce in March to place an order for 200 marine versions of the Merlin engines by the end of the year, with another 20 to 40 spares for June 1941. They told me, in no uncertain terms, that all their output is currently spoken for, and they have no spare capacity. I have to say that I found their attitude towards this department quite abrasive, claiming that fulfilling our order would mean 200 fewer fighter aircraft.
Since then I have explored of the possibility of replacing the Merlins with Paxman-Ricardo diesels, but these will need two per machine, where the Merlins would be able to power them individually. With the reduction in the number of Cultivators on order, the production of 100 diesels of this size within the timeframe may be possible, but only if it is approved by the Ministry of Supply.
Ruston-Bucyrus estimate that each Cultivator will require 36000 components, 71 assemblies and over 250 suppliers, in addition to the 83 tons of steel needed for construction. With the increase in tank manufacture many of the suppliers who would produce these components for the Cultivators are currently being used for the production of tanks, and those we have spoken to say they do not have the ability to expand capacity to meet the orders we would like to put to them. Ruston-Bucyrus are also concerned that they will not have the necessary skilled workforce if subcontracting work has to be kept in house.
In summary, the downgrading of this project has made the possibility of completing the order for the spring of 1941 almost impossible to achieve. If these great machines of war are to break open the German defensive positions and clear the way for our infantry and tanks, then they will need to be given higher priority, which of course will interfere with the production of tanks and fighter aircraft.
I remain your humble servant,
Charles H Hopkins. Director of Naval Land Equipment.
Thank you Miss Sinclair, have that ready for review and signing by the end of the day, if you please. That is all.”
The men of 5th Royal Tank Regiment had been issued with the first batch of Valentine tanks just before the battles of May. There had been lots of problems with the tanks. Because of the rushed production, they were unreliable and because of the design, they were cramped. The first tanks off the production line had gone straight to 5RTR who felt they were being used to put the prototypes through their paces in action. In general, they had proven reasonable battle tanks, but suffered from falling between two stools. They were too slow to be cruisers and too lightly protected to be infantry tanks. Once they got used to them, 5RTR had grown happy enough with the Valentine, for all its faults.
Vickers-Armstrong had been fully informed of the problems and concerns that their new tanks had caused. They were now unloading a set of replacement tanks. Like the first lot, these were the first month’s production, literally just off the production line. Although there were only twelve, not quite enough for one squadron, it was hoped that 5RTR would put them through their paces and again give the company their feedback. As promised Vickers had produced a three-man turret by modifications to allow the addition of a loader to ease the duties of the commander. The turret’s side armour was reduced to save weight. It still had the 2-pdr gun, but the turret was certainly an improvement over the first one. It was also received an improved engine to give it slightly better power and speed. Vickers had also noted the comments about the size of hatches, and these tanks had been modified to give an extra few inches to each hatch.
The men had a tour of the new tanks and then took them out to put them through their paces. They did indeed find them improved, but the same problems existed in terms of reliability. The kind of craftsmanship practised by British workers (some joked that it was the ability to fit two things together which do not fit) meant that many man hours were spent by the Battalion’s fitters and mechanics trying to keep tanks on the road. While work was going on to improve mass production in Britain’s factories, there was still a long way to go. The tracks were a particular cause for swearing.
The other innovation, much debated among the gunners, was the decision to change the gun mounting. British tank crews had been trained to fire on the move. Therefore, the guns in British tanks were braced against the gunner’s shoulder, and he physically controlled the position of the gun as he fired. However, it was clear that firing on the move was a thing of the past. Despite the poor performance of the German 37mm anti-tank gun, German tactics for its employment were much better that the British tankers had expected.
As the 2-pdr’s HE shell was limited at best, the fact was that the tanks spent much more time fighting German anti-tank gun screens than they did panzers. This made the need for ‘one shot – one kill’ essential for the survival of the tank. The professionals who started the war had adequate training for firing on the move, but those who were currently training weren’t getting as much time as needed to learn the skill. The decision had been made to make the mount of the gun stable, to be traversed laterally and vertically by controls, rather than the gunner’s body. The fact that the tank should stop and fire was anathema to some commanders. It was said that Percy Hobart was furious, but as the future tanks were going to have larger guns, and the size of the Royal Armoured Corps increased, it was judged a necessary change.
2 August 1940. Hatfield.
Geoffrey De Havilland took the second prototype on its first flight, finding it to be everything the design team hoped for. The first prototype, W4050, had flown in June. Now the second, in a fighter configuration, was being tested to see if it had ironed out the teething troubles of the first prototype. Men from the Air Ministry watched and were delighted with the way in which the plane seemed to fulfil their expectations. It looked like there would be no need for a third prototype, so pre-production models were expected to be built next. If these proved themselves, the Air Ministry wanted mass production to begin as soon as possible.
3 August 1940. Ottawa. Canada.
Prime Minister McKenzie King: “So, we have two Infantry Divisions now in France and Belgium; the air training plan is going very well; and the RCN is expanding. The production of vehicles is ramping up along with mineral extraction and agriculture. Support for the war in Quebec is growing in the light of the French resistance to German aggression, and the bombing of Paris. The question now is, what more can Canada do?
Clarence Howe (Minister for Munitions and Supply): Obviously we can’t touch conscription, but perhaps we could do more to move to a complete war economy. So far, London hasn’t been overly directive in what they want from us, beyond what you’ve mentioned, and that scientific group that has come over.
James Ralston (Minister of National Defence): If the Quebecois are coming around, maybe we could get conscription, but I know you don’t want to fight that battle yet. Our third Division should be Armoured, but that raises the question of what tank we build. General Motor’s group in Britain, Vauxhall, have the contract for a new tank for next year. For myself, I would argue that three divisions should form a Canadian Corps, with Canadian leadership. That should mirror the ANZACs, and also, we should have a better say in its employment.
The Air Training Plan is going to be our major contribution in terms of investment and personnel. The training structure includes twelve elementary flying training schools, sixteen advanced or service flying training schools, ten air observer schools, ten bombing and gunnery schools, two air navigation schools and four wireless or radio training school. The number of training aircraft needed is estimated at 3500. That lot will cost a great deal of money, to be met by ourselves, with contributions from the British and to a lesser extent Australia and New Zealand. The British want to meet most of their cost in kind, supplying engines and such.
Most of our aircraft building facilities are making trainers. De Havilland, in Downsview, Ontario, are building Tiger Moth trainers at the moment. They are talking of expanding as they have a new twin engine plane that they’re going to start on soon. Noorduyn are making Havard trainers. Fairchild in Quebec are producing Cornells. Fairchild are also building Bristol Blenheims, though they call them Bolingbrokes. The Bolingbrooke has a duel use as trainers and patrol aircraft.
National Steel Car in Malton are currently making Lysander army cooperation planes, and sub-contracting for various other aircraft, especially Ansons and Hurricanes. We need the Ansons for multi-engine training. Canadian Associated Aircraft are building Hampdens for the RAF. The concentration on so many trainers is obviously to help the expansion of the Air Training Plan.
Prime Minister McKenzie King: So, we’ll be producing pilots, trucks and food. One Corps, seems fair, and there should be enough volunteers to keep them up to strength. We really need to have a voice within the Imperial General Staff, we must learn the lessons of the last lot. I’m meeting President Roosevelt later this month, there have been some initial talks about what kind of cooperation we can have regarding defence of North America. I certainly am keen on bringing the Americans further into the fold, without straining things with London too much.
3 August 1940. In the skies over Germany.
Sgt George 'Grumpy' Unwin and A Flight of 19 Squadron were on their first combat sortie since transitioning onto the Spitfire Mk II. It had felt as if the air war had calmed down a little over the last month or so, each side licking its wounds and rebuilding. Today four of the new Spitfire squadrons were flying top cover for a raid by Wellingtons of 3 Group of Bomber Command. The target for the Wellingtons was the airfield at Mönchengladbach. This had been bombed on numerous occasions, but it was still a target, as it is very difficult to close down an airfield permanently. The presence of such a large number of bombers on a daylight raid, was hopefully too tempting a target for the Me109s.
The RDF ground controller called out the arrival of the German defenders. The RAF’s continual attacks on German radars had left the Luftwaffe still at a distinct disadvantage against raids such as this. They were having to rely on ground observers for the most part. The German aircraft that attempted to intercept the RAF raid did so in a piecemeal fashion. With the much more advanced radars available to guide the Spitfires, Unwin and the other Spitfire pilots fell on the Me109s again and again, mostly before they got to the bombers.
Unwin’s squadron dived out of the sun onto a squadron of Bf109s that were still trying to climb to altitude before attacking the bombers. The arrival of the Spitfires, all armed with four 20mm canons, was a terrible surprise to the Luftwaffe pilots. Unwin scored his eleventh kill as the cannon shells hacked a Messerschmitt out of the sky. The Spitfires didn’t hang around. Having dived through the enemy formation they climbed back to their original height, ready for a second pass. Six Me109s and one Spitfire were tumbling to the earth, as the surviving German fighters attempted to reform.
Where Unwin’s Mk I Spitfire was at best a match for the Bf109, these Mk IIs now held a distinct advantage. This was an advantage which Unwin and his squadron mates made full use of. Another three Bf109s were shot down, and the survivors were all running as fast as they could for home. One more Spitfire was shot down and another damaged, but as 19 Squadron returned to base, 9 kills for 2 losses seemed like a good day’s work. Altogether the Germans lost 19 aircraft attacking the British raid, with another six damaged. Four Spitfires failed to return, and another four had various levels of damage. Five Wellingtons were lost, mostly to flak. The damage to the airfield was judged moderate. Later it became clear that the airfield had been abandoned, as the Luftwaffe had generally pulled back behind the Rhine.
4 August 1940. Seelin, France. RAF Forward airbase.
53 Squadron had all the surviving Blenheims in France bar one. 139 Squadron’s “C” for Charlie had been given a very specific task. The fight against the German radar had been one of the odd parts of the war. They had initially been “listening” for known frequencies of the various types of German radar, but it was obvious that the Germans were doing everything they could to change frequencies as much as possible to hamper this part of the RAF’s effort. When that became obvious at the end of May a new boffin with a different piece of equipment had arrived and “C” for Charlie had been the recipient.
Flight Lieutenant Paddy Green had been briefed on the importance of this bit of kit, and the importance of it never falling into enemy hands. He had been aggrieved to discover that as part of the installation a small explosive charge and fuse had been included that was to be used if the aircraft was in danger of being compromised. As the plane’s commander he wondered if putting live explosives into it, with all the attendant risks, wasn’t just asking for trouble.
What was worse was the observer, Bill Neville, who was assigned. He wasn’t RAF, but Fleet Air Arm, and he wasn’t very complementary about Crab Air, as he seemed to enjoy calling the RAF. But the man knew how to use the device, which he called Orange Crop. It swept the frequency band, and when it picked up a source it warbled, allowing Bill to identify it and locate it. He was then able to call in a flight of Hurribombers who would attack it. Bill mentioned that someone was working on a rocket that would be able to ride the beam back to its source, he called it a Shrike, but it seemed that it would be sometime before it would be ready. In the meantime, Paddy’s job was to fly the Blenheim well behind the Entente front line. They were always accompanied by one of the new Beaufighters with AI radar. While Bill listened for enemy radar on his receiver, it was becoming clearer that the Germans were emplacing their radars further back than before. The Blenheim, and Orange Crop, weren’t allowed to fly over German held territory. Some other plan was going to have to be dreamt up to seek out the German radar.
3 August 1940. John I. Thornycroft & Company. Woolston, Southampton.
Commander Paul Canter, former captain of HMS Active, leading the design team for the Ton class minesweeper, celebrated the Admiralty’s decision to commission their design. An initial order for ten were placed with Thornycroft and its group of fifteen smaller yards that would build the ships. With double mahogany hull planking, almost the entire vessel was to be constructed from light aluminium alloy and other materials with the lowest possible magnetic field to achieve optimum safety when sweeping for magnetic mines. They would be protected from pressure mines by their low displacement, and the threat of moored mines was greatly reduced by their shallow draught. To prevent potential damage caused by marine parasites, they would be fitted at first with a copper sheath.
Canter had a team trying to “invent” ‘Cascover’ nylon sheathing. DuPont had been approached by ICI for a license to make nylon for the British market, and work was being done on a whole lot of new chemicals and epoxies in various universities and factories. There weren’t enough chemistry degrees in the Bristol Group men to satisfy everyone, but all sorts of materials were being examined in great detail for a variety of uses.
The Ton class that Canter had captained earlier in his career, HMS Gavington, was powered by two Deltic diesel engines built in the 1950s by Napier & Sons. Three companies with experience of building diesel engines, Perkins, Mirrlees and L. Gardner & Sons had been working with the Bristol Group to make improved Diesel engines. These would have applications for all types of vehicles and ships. There were a number of diesel engines and generators in the Bristol Group, and many of the engineering officers had had plenty of experience on engines, including the Deltic. The design for the Ton Class had taken a Deltic clone as its proposed engine. There was a lack of torsional vibration in the Deltics that made them handy for mine sweeping vessels.
The upper works were as much as Canter and a few other officers and ratings who had served on Ton class ships remembered. It would be armed with a Bofors 40mm gun, and have the capacity to carry two Oerlikon 20mm guns, or other heavy machine guns for self-protection. While the Type 193 mine hunting sonar was still a long way from being developed, the new ships were designed with it in mind. Once it was developed, the Ton Class would be mine hunters as well as mine sweepers.
4 August 1940. Over Thames Estuary.
Pilot officer James Wilson, with Johnny Campbell working the Air Interception Radar were on the tail of yet another intruder attempting to lay mines in the shipping lanes into London. Over the last month this had been their nightly duty in B for Baker, their Bristol Beaufighter Nightfighter. The RAF Hampdens had been doing sterling work mining the German ports, and the Luftwaffe were trying to repay the compliment. The Germans had deployed both acoustic and magnetic mines, faster than they had in the Bristol Group’s experience, and while the Royal Navy was in a better position to counter them, it was thought better to prevent them being laid in the first place.
Wilson and Campbell, along with the rest of their squadron, were prepared every night to search for prey. The German intruders were mostly Ju-88s, a fast bomber. B for Baker had a speed advantage, but not by too much. The RAF nightfighters also had excellent radar coverage. HMS Bristol had been brought to the port of Felixstowe, where it was camouflaged by day and sailed at night to provide enhanced radar coverage for the lower North Sea. At least two Beaufighters would be on constant patrol, ready to be guided by Bristol’s control team.
The radio sparked to life, “Baker 1, we have custom for you, three bogies”, giving the bearing and height. Wilson acknowledged and swung the heavy fighter onto an intercept course, allowing the gentle dive to increase his speed for the interception. Campbell was scanning the AI radar ready to try to pick up the bogies. They generally found trying to locate an aircraft below them was beyond the radar’s capability. Relying on Bristol’s well practiced team to guide him, Wilson rapidly closed on the German aircraft. There was enough moonlight to give Wilson a visual sighting of the trailing aircraft. Campbell was struggling still to get a clear signal from among the general surface return. With the Ju-88 firmly in his sights, he opened fire with the four machine guns, and when they were on the target, added a two second burst from the four 20mm canons. The German bomber disintegrated, its port wing separating from the fuselage, and the rest spinning into the sea. “Splash one bogie”, Wilson reported.
The other two aircraft split up and went in opposite directions. Wilson followed the one that turned to port, applying full military power to try to overtake it. The German pilot took his plane down to wave top height and was running for his life. The Beaufighter closed the range steadily. More in hope than in expectation, Wilson fired a burst of machine gun bullets. The rear gunner in the Ju-88 must have reported this, because the German pilot began taking evasive actions, but as he was so low, he tipped the end of his wing into a wave and the whole aircraft cartwheeled, crashing to its demise. Wilson pulled up hard to avoid the wreckage, and to gain some height. “Splash second bogie, and I literally mean, ‘splash’” Wilson reported.
HMS Bristol’s air controller gave him an update on the position of the third bogie, but there was little chance of catching it now. He climbed to five thousand feet, checking his fuel state, Campbell relaxing somewhat from his radar screen. Wilson hoped to pick off the intruder as it exited the area, but he saw flashes of flak coming from the picket ships off Sheerness and a large explosion which looked a lot like a plane exploding. The kind of explosion where perhaps a shell had detonated one of the mines it was carrying. This was confirmed by Bristol control, the threat board read all clear, so Wilson took the Beaufighter up to ten thousand feet and took up a long racetrack pattern until it was time to return to base. Most nights nothing at all happened, so at least they would have some to report to the debriefing officer when they got back. Then bacon and eggs, and off to bed.
5 August 1940. The Admiralty. London.
Captain Hugo White, formerly captain of HMS Avenger, a type 21 Frigate, sat listening to the debate about whether or not to keep attempting to slip submarines into the Baltic. The first group of six had lost two and had one damaged. They had also stirred up a hornets nest. There was heavy increase in Kriegsmarine activity in the narrows around Denmark. A second group of four submarines had attempted to enter the Baltic not long after the first group left. However only one succeeded, two were lost and one more limped into Oslo damaged. The one that succeeded, HMS Sterlit, was now overdue.
White had commanded an Oberon class submarine, and been commander of Submarine Sea Training in his time. This knowledge and experience had stood him in good stead when he had become a frigate driver and expert in anti-submarine warfare. Seeing the problem from both sides helped and when asked for his opinion he suggested a very radical plan.
5 August 1940. Royal Naval College, Greenwich, London.
Captain James Weatherall, formerly of HMS Andromeda, sat with the senior staff as they talked about the changes that were planned to the training courses for Royal Navy Officers and ratings. Weatherall had passed out from Dartmouth in 1954, and had served in a number of capacities, including as Commander of Seamanship Training after the Cod wars with Iceland.
Weatherall compared the course that he had completed, a course that had evolved in the light of the Second World War, to the current course, that of 1940. It was clear that there was a lot of room for improvement. Some of the basics would be the same, no matter what era the training was taking place in, that was the easy bit. Officers being trained now, would have to deal with huge technological advances that were under development. These developments would transform anti-submarine warfare, the asdic they were used to was going to become sonar. In anti-aircraft warfare, the use of radar and missiles would have to be dealt with. In engineering, they would soon start to see not just steam plants, but gas turbines.
The Royal Navy was trying to manage a vastly expanded class size, made up of conscripts, rather than the volunteers they were used to. HMS Collingwood and HMS Raleigh had been opened in January 1940 as the Training Establishment for "hostilities only' ratings of the Seaman Branch. There were batches of about 1000 trainees joining every 3 weeks for a 10-week course. HMS Ganges, another shore establishment had to be taken over for this purpose. HMS King Alfred, had trained new officers from the pre-war Royal Navy Volunteer (Supplementary) Reserve (RNV(S)R). It was now providing training for the RNVR, a training course which consisted of the first two weeks at HMS King Alfred II, then six weeks at HMS King Alfred III and the final four weeks at Hove. Upon successful completion of the course, the men emerged as Temporary Acting Probationary Sub-Lieutenants and attended further training at the Royal Naval College, Greenwich before being posted operationally.
Weatherall had been appointed by the Oversight Committee to help guide the process of making sure that the officers and ratings being trained now, would be ready to face the future navy requirements. It was important that as much of the technical know-how of the future was disseminated as widely as possible, so that after the war was finished these men could be at the fore-front of the new industrial revolution that would come.
He had brought along three of his officers from Andromeda, Commanders Mike Cowley, David Watson and Lieutenant-Commander Mark Whyte. Cowley was the ship’s engineer and Watson was senior weapons officer. There were plenty of other jobs that these two men could have been doing, but Weatherall needed them here to implement some of the changes. The two Commanders had been commissioned from Dartmouth in the 1970s, by which time the course had changed again from Weatherall’s time. Mark Whyte was a ‘schoolie’, and he was brought along to work on the changes needed to the curriculum that the Royal Navy used in training, to make sure that the “new learning” was provided for them.
The “Schoolies” branch of the Royal Navy, which dealt with initial and on-going training, was expanding to meet the expansion of the wartime navy. Whyte, with Weatherall’s supervision, worked out a course at the University of Bristol, at which the advances in the physical sciences were taught. The cover story was that the Government had put together a secret committee of academics in the 1930’s, with the possibility of war looming, to advance British science. This secrecy was the reason that no academic articles had been published. The work of this committee, “The Bristol Group” was now to be used to win the war by beating the Germans scientifically, and to make Great Britain the world leader in science and industry.
Over the last six months every Bristol Group man with a degree, especially those with Masters, and there were a couple with Doctorates, had been fully debriefed by a teams of experts on what they knew. Some of the men had taken to calling this the “Manhattan Project” due to the explosive nature of forty years of scientific advances being dropped into academia. It would take some years to work through everything, but there was plenty of material to train the Schoolies in the basics. One effect of this was to increase the time of basic training. While the number of new ships being launched and commissioned was increasing, there was enough time to add a week to the various courses. This meant that when the new recruits, or cadet officers, went on to their specialised courses, they were better prepared. The production of little booklets to enable the schoolies to give lectures on all manner of subjects were a priority.
Mike Cowley and David Watson did a similar job with the engineering branch and executive branch respectively. Commander Cowley worked out of Keyham College. While most of the engineers would continue to work on steam plants, a certain percentage were given further training in gas turbines, these in turn would become instructors in due course. Watson worked with the staff at Greenwich, under the command of Captain John Davis to try to learn the lessons of naval warfare from what might and might not happen.
5 August 1940. The Admiralty. London.
Captain Steven Johnston, former captain of HMS Minerva, had been put into the committee looking at future building plans for the Royal Navy. Johnston had an almost encyclopaedic knowledge of the ships of the Royal Navy. His father had been a keen model builder and had shared his enthusiasm with his son. His father was currently commanding HMS Charleston, unaware that his future son was anxiously watching for any report on that particular ship.
The discussion this particular day was the 1941 and 1942 Naval Building Programme. The 1939 and 1940 Emergency War Programme had concentrated on destroyers and other escort vessels. In September 1939, at the outbreak of war, it was expected that 213 warships (264,000 tons) would be completed within a year. By July 1940 only 105 ships (130,000 tons) had been completed. The Ministry of Supply was keen on keeping the ability to build 1.2 million gross tons of merchant shipping per year, in addition to the naval programme. With the reduced threat of the German navy in general and its U-boats in particular, the Admiralty had a chance to consider what it needed in both the short and long term.
In the short term, the first thing identified was that it was crucial to improve the ship building industry itself. Too many builders suffered from general obsolescence. A survey had been done in February 1940 and found that in the shipyards' machine tools, heavy plant, especially cranes and power supplies, were generally deficient, and provisions for welding were very meagre. Most of the marine engineers worked with old machines; a large proportion were twenty to thirty years old, working at speeds in wartime for which they were not designed. The technical processes, especially in coppersmiths' and blacksmiths' shops, were slow and old-fashioned.
All these facts were well known both in the industry and in the Admiralty. The pressure of immediate production tasks had left the firms no time to do a comprehensive survey and undertake drastic reform. In any case, their capital resources wouldn’t enable them to embark on a wholesale reconstruction out of their own means. If the admiralty wanted better ships, they would to have to help the industry to get better. This would hopefully have the secondary effect of keeping Great Britain as a premier ship-building nation into the future.
A rolling programme of improvements were being implemented, with a large emphasis on welding techniques and tools. Prefabrication and assembly line style construction were being promoted, often resisted by the workforce. The need to maintain a balanced output was noted. Too much emphasis on one type of vessel all too often slowed rather than quickened production as bottlenecks were experienced. Engines, turbines, guns, fire control systems, damage control, electronics (especially with the decision to move to an AC system in future builds) were all areas where industry was still gearing up. These bottlenecks halted production while crucial equipment wasn’t available. This problem could only be dealt with by a well-planned and organised system. The number of conversions of older ships, as well as the vast increase in number of escorts ordered, had thrown the shipyards into a panic. While some of these escorts had been cancelled in the first few months of 1940, there were still many on the slips awaiting completion.
In the longer term the Admiralty had its “two power” target. This was the ability to take on two powers at the same time. Leaving aside the American fleet which was an unlikely foe, and presuming the cooperation of the French fleet in the Mediterranean, which balanced the Italian fleet, that left Germany and Japan. The Kriegsmarine had been sorely wounded in the first half of 1940. It was bottled up in the Baltic, and just the two battleships, Bismark and Tirpitz were thought of as a threat when they came into operation. The arrival of the first three King George V class battleships would keep the balance. The U-boat menace still had to be taken into account, even though it was currently curtailed. The Japanese were building up a powerful navy with a few very powerful battleships, but focussed on the aircraft carrier.
The five King George Vs had all been launched in 1940. The lead ship, KGV itself, would join the fleet in October, the rest would follow, two in 1941, two in 1942. With four Revenge and five Queen Elizabeth class battleships, three battlecruisers, and Nelson and Rodney, the battle line was currently very strong. Two Lion class battleships had been laid down in 1939, and work was continuing on them, though without haste. There was no chance that these would be delivered before 1943 at the earliest, and therefore changes to their design were being considered.
Firstly, knowing the Mark II 16-inch guns would be a bottleneck, the Admiralty was prepared to accept delivery of the two Lion Class battleships to be put back to 1944/5. The Bristol Group had supplied the information that HMS Rodney’s 16-inch guns had played a large part in the destruction of the Bismark in Bristol’s time line. They also took into account the decision of the Americans to go with 16-inch guns on their future battleships. This convinced the admirals that 16-inch guns was the right choice. HMS Lion and Temeraire would have a dual purpose secondary battery of 5.25 inch twin mounts and a large number of Bofors 40mm AAA. They would carry no aircraft, but room for a helicopter to land was considered. Improvements to their propulsion, bow and stern would give them at least 30 knots, though 33 knots was the goal. They would be designed to carry more fuel to extend their range, important if they were working in the Pacific.
Johnston, like the rest of the Bristol Group men, argued long and hard that the days of the battleship were over. The battleship admirals focussed on the intelligence that the Americans decided to recommission four of their battleships for service in the 1980s. Obviously this proved that the battleship still had a place in future warfare. The Admiralty wanted to end the current war with modern battleships. If the Revenge and Queen Elizabeth Classes were scrapped after the war, then five KGVs and two Lions would provide a gun line well into the sixties. Captain Johnston made a mental note to have a word with Alan Grose before Churchill would see these plans. If Churchill could be persuaded to cut the Lion Class down even to one, that would help.
The Illustrious class aircraft carriers: HMS Illustrious, Formidable, Victorious, Indomitable were all being brought into service as planned. HMS Victorious and Indomitable, joining the fleet in 1941, were being completed with only minor improvements so as not to delay their introduction. HMS Unicorn would act as depot ship as planned. HMS Implacable and Indefatigable, were being redesigned as transitional ships, proving the new ideas of angled flight deck, deck edge lift and steam catapults. They were due to be commissioned in 1943/4, and hopefully be ready for the first generation of jet aircraft. The decision was made that the Audacious class carriers wouldn’t be ordered. Instead, two Malta Class aircraft carriers would be laid down, one in 1941 and one in 1942. These should be delivered in 1944 and 1945. The Malta Class at 50000 tons would be the recipients of as much new technology in their construction and propulsion as possible. There would be an expectation that they would be in service for at least forty years.
As the Illustrious and Implacable Class carriers came into service, the older, smaller aircraft carriers (Argus, Furious and Glorious) would be decommissioned. Johnston noted that without the Lions, another Malta could be built, possibly two.
There were seven Rapana class MACs being converted. This hybrid of a tanker and aircraft carrier would be useful for convoy protection, but they were otherwise too limited, especially without hanger facilities. There were high hopes that the Wessex type helicopters, designed for ASW warfare would provide convoys with all the air cover they would need, especially as the U-boat menace was curtailed. Large merchant men would be far more easily adapted to carry helicopters than fixed wing aircraft, as RFA Olna showed.
The Admiralty still felt a need for light carriers to supplement the fleet carriers. The debate on this raged for some time. The argument came down to a choice between a 14000 tons Majestic Class and a 22000 tons Centaur Class. Those in favour of the Majestic Class argued that it could be built more quickly and cheaply, but were countered with the fact that they would have a limited service life. The Centaur Class was bigger, and more expensive, and with a longer service life be better value for money. This was countered with the fact that more Majestics could be built for the same price of the Centaurs. The decision was to propose building four Centaurs and two Maltas, which for the next forty years was considered the better investment. It was hoped that some of the Dominions might be interested in a Centaur Class ships. The recommendation was to lay down two in 1941, to be delivered in 1943/4, with another two in 1942 for delivery in 1944/5.
Johnston made another note to talk to Grose about. The French were building Richelieu class battleships, the Richelieu currently on her way to the Far East and the Jean Bart almost completed. They had just started two more, the Clemenceau and Gascogne, and were talking about two Alsace class ships, very like the Lions after those. The Joffre aircraft carrier was 20% built and the Painlevé was on order. It might be worth a conversation about building one of the Alsace (with appropriate modifications) for the Royal Navy instead of the Lion Class, if the battleship admirals were adamant. In exchange, British shipyards could build either a Centaur or Malta Class for the Marine National. His mind wondered to other ideas. Perhaps we could sell the French the last two Illustrious Class, in the hope of two more Centaurs in their place. He honestly didn’t think anyone would go for it, but it was another idea worth considering.
The program would see the building of seven cruisers per year. The current program of Dido, Fiji and Abdiel class cruisers could be succeeded by Tiger class ships in 1941 and 1942, if the design could be finalised. The plan for Destroyers was for them to be built at a rate of 16 per year. The current J, K, L, M and N Classes under construction or near completion might be succeeded by something akin to the Battle class destroyers in 1941 and 1942. The War Emergency Programme Destroyers (O, P, Q & R classes) that had been laid down, as far as possible, will be converted to Type 15 Frigates. Hunt class destroyer-escorts that have not yet been laid down should be cancelled. The current escort vessels, mostly Flower class corvettes, would be cancelled unless too far into construction. Many of these would become “gunboats” in the colonies rather than trying to shepherd convoys across the Atlantic, for which they were quite unsuited. Black Swan sloops under construction would be completed, but their convoy escort role would be taken over eventually by the Type 15 Frigates.
The Ton Class minesweeper production was confirmed, replacing the all the Bangor Class that haven’t been started. Johnston was happy to see Paul Canter’s work was coming to fruition. The Algerine Class would also be put into production.
There were a few new types of vessels that would also be ordered into production. The size of an amphibious landing like the D-Day described by the Bristol Group would be unlikely. Currently there was serious lack of any kind of specialised amphibious ships. Landing Ship Docks, based on HMS Fearless of the Falklands task force, and Logistic Landing Ships like Sir Galahad should be designed and built. It was envisioned that they would need enough ships to be able to land a division of troops ashore with all their equipment. The idea of a purpose-built commando carrier for Helicopter operations, would be given further consideration, perhaps based on the same model as the Unicorn.
The second group of vessels that were planned was an expansion of the Royal Fleet Auxiliary. RFA Olna had opened the eyes of the Admiralty to what was called a Fleet Train. This hadn’t been seen as necessary, the Royal Navy was blessed with the provision of plenty of bases all over the world. The fact that replenishment vessels could keep the level of operations at a higher tempo for longer was understood as a force multiplier. So, with the help of the RFA officers and men who had served on various vessels, a number of designs would be drawn up. Large fleet tankers, fleet replenishment ships, store support ships, were some of the ideas that would need to be explored.
The Admiralty hoped that by 1944 the Royal Navy would be a modern, balanced fleet. The wartime expansion of the navy would not be as great as in the Bristol Group timeline, for they had already won the greatest battle of that war, the Battle of the Atlantic. It was now extremely unlikely to happen the way it had. War, if it were to break out in the Mediterranean and Pacific, would no doubt be very different to what the Bristol Group’s history looked like. There were plenty of men in Admiralty who wanted to make sure that the Royal Navy would still be the premier navy of the world in 1945 and beyond.
6 August 1940. HMS Dido. The Irish Sea.
The new 5.25-inch dual purpose guns were being tested on HMS Dido which was working up towards commission. These new weapons were being fitted on the Dido Class of cruisers and as the secondary armament in the KGV battleships. With an expected rate of fire of 10-12 rounds per minute, the reality was very different. The cramped conditions of the turret, the heavy weight of the shell and cartridge, and the fuze setter meant that at best seven or eight rounds were all the crews could manage.
The crews were rested after their exertions and a team of boffins appeared with a number of experimental shells. These were the first VT, or proximity fuzes, in artillery ammunition that Pye had been working on. The test involved barrage balloons from which were suspended various targets. The sailors manned their guns, with the new shells they were instructed to fire only one aimed shell per gun at 30 second intervals so that the boffins could note the effects. The first ten shells scored a 5% hit rate. The second ten was about the same, slightly better. The third ten was only about 2%. There were only twenty shells left, and the sailors manning the guns were asked to fire them as standard. So in three turrets, the six guns had one shell each. In less than ten seconds all the shells were fired off, with a 4% hit rate. To the sailors surprise, the boffins went away quite happy, they had learned a great deal in this test.
6 August 1940. Bletchley Park.
Commander Alastair Denniston, operational head of GC&CS at Bletchley Park explained what was happening to his superior. “Either the Germans are getting wise to us, or it could be just a coincidence, but it looks like they are all moving to a four rotor enigma. I wouldn’t be surprised if it is just a normal improvement cycle, but the fact that we have been reading their mail must have at least have occurred to them. We knew that this might happen, and we have had plans in place for just such a contingency. Realistically, we have to consider that we might be blind for at least a few weeks.”
As a consequence, a signal was sent all Entente units – “Possible enemy action expected. Highest readiness. Ends”
6 August 1940. Meaux, France
The flash message warning of possible enemy action meant that all the modified Spitfires of No. 212 (Photographic Reconnaissance) Squadron, were sent off to photograph the length and breadth of the German lines, looking for any sign of an impending attack. Two to three hours later they landed and their cameras were quickly processed to get the film to the Central Interpretation Unit, based in a chateaux on the outskirts of Paris.
The main CIU was back in Medmenham in England, but it took too long to get the film back to there and then bring the intelligence back to France. Some of the staff of photo interpreters were brought over to do their work in closer partnership with the Entente’s intelligence headquarters. Sarah Oliver was on duty when the film from 212 squadron’s flights arrived. Comparing the previous photographs with those that were just developed, the WAAF, like the rest of her team, looked for any changes that would provide the clues to German intentions.
For the last two months the remnant of Panzer Group Kleist had been regrouping and rebuilding near Koln. This had been under pretty constant aerial surveillance, and occasional air attack. Oliver compared the new and old photographs of this area first. If the Panzer force was on the move, then it be a sure sign that the Germans were up to something. Looking at the new photographs it was obvious that they had moved, so the next question was where? It was going to be a long day to track them down.
6 August 1940. Mons, Belgium.
20th Armoured Brigade (CO Evelyn Fanshawe) had been brought over to Belgium at the end of July with their mixture of new Valentines, A10s and A13mkII Cruiser tanks. The 1st Royal Gloucestershire Hussars (Valentines), and 1st and 2nd Northamptonshire Yeomanry (A10s & A13s) made up the Brigade. It was decided to add 20th Armoured Brigade to the First Army Tank Brigade (renamed as 11th Armoured Brigade, CO Douglas Pratt) to create the Second Armoured Division in Belgium. The infantry element, was to be provided by the 56th (London) Division, which gave up the 168th Brigade (OC Brigadier Guy Portman). This Brigade was the first to be fully equipped with the new Militant battle taxis and the 6-pdr anti-tank gun. 2nd Armoured Division, commanded by General Justice Tilly, had only had a few days together when the alert notice was given.
General Claude Auchinleck, the new commander of First Army decided that 2nd Armoured would replace 48th Division in I Corps. Newly promoted General Somerset would take 48th Division into GHQ reserve. 1st and 2nd Infantry Division, with 2nd Armoured Division would be a very strong Corps. General Auchinleck had high hopes for them. With the threat of ‘the balloon going up’ again, Auchinleck and Franklyn, (I Corps commander) decided to leave 2nd Armoured Division at Mons. If anything did happen, they were in a good position to come forward if they were needed.
General Tilly had been one of the chief instructors at Bovington before the war, and like Hobart, was a keen proponent of armoured warfare. He had read the reports on the fighting in May and he had spent a good amount of time talking to Douglas Pratt (OC 11th Armoured Brigade) who had been at the forefront of it. Tilly wanted to try out something which he described as quite German. 2nd Armoured Division was made up of five armoured battalions or regiments, one reconnaissance regiment (in light tanks), three infantry battalions, along with artillery (field, anti-tank and anti-aircraft), engineers and all the other support arms. He organised the division into “Battle Groups (BG).” Each group would have a mixture of tanks (including reconnaissance), infantry, artillery (all three types) and engineers. Tilly kept the traditional triangular structure. If fighting together, the Division would have three BGs, each the equivalent of a Brigade. Each Battle Group would likewise be made up of three battalion sized BGs, and these in turn would be made up of three or four squadron or company sized BGs.
The British army had very limited training in such a scheme, and so the first and most important job that Tilly had to master was getting the officers who would be fighting together to stop fighting among themselves. The keys to success were training and communications. The greater availability of radios helped with the later, though 48th Division felt aggrieved when they lost many of theirs to the new unit. For the former, training, training, training was the order of the day, and with a missing panzer group somewhere on the loose, Tilly worked himself and his men relentlessly.
7 August 1940. The Admiralty. London, England.
The Naval Air Service, or Fleet Air Arm as it liked to call itself, was still in transition. Having been handed back to the Royal Navy from the RAF in 1937, it had been starved of aircraft by the Air Ministry. Had it been handed back in 1934 as some had argued, its position would have been far stronger. However, that wasn’t what happened. The arrival of the Bristol group, with a good number of Fleet Air Arm personnel, had focused the minds of those in charge and led to this meeting, which was finalising its future orders of aircraft.
With three more Illustrious class carriers arriving in the fleet in fairly short order, with more carriers to follow in 1943, this meeting was to think through the aircraft that would provide the best air groups for the carriers. Currently Sea Hurricanes had been rushed into operation to replace the Gladiators that had formed the fighter squadrons. This was certainly an improvement over the biplanes, but still left a lot to be desired. The version of the SeaHurricane that were being produced were powered by Merlin 45 engines, carried four 20mm cannon armament, and all the accoutrements of a naval fighter. The feedback from pilots was favourable, but it wasn’t going to be the fighter of the future.
Just arrived in service were the first Fairey Fulmers, which had been designed as an interim fighter anyway. The Fulmers could prove useful as a reconnaissance aircraft, with its observer and long range. But as a fighter it was judged sadly lacking, despite the aerodynamic tweaks to give it better performance. Giving it a Griffon engine, like the Firefly might be an improvement, but it still didn’t look the part. The belief that Fleet Air Arm planes needed two crew to do the job had not been borne out. There were now better navigational aids available to help pilots return to the carrier. The size of the Fulmer was judged good for carrying radars of one kind or another. The trials with a Wellington AEW aircraft were being watched carefully by the Navy, and the Fulmer was being considered as a test bed to provide AEW for the carriers. The current order for 127 aircraft would be fulfilled, but not increased. Three Firefly prototypes were ordered from Fairey.
There was some debate about attempting to move to a Seafire. The new Mk II Spitfire was coming into service with the RAF could be adapted for carrier use. There were problems with the idea, the Spitfire's lack of range, coupled with a long nose and narrow, and flimsy, undercarriage, made it less than perfect for carrier use. Design work had been done on producing a folding wing version of the Spitfire in 1939 and early 1940. Westland and Cunliffe-Owen had been invited to look at doing this with the Mark II. It was clear that there was a need to plumb the aircraft to take drop tanks to extend its range. Modifications to the landing gear would have to made if it was ever going to be robust enough for flight deck operations. Some good work was being done with the Oleo pneumatic landing gear found in the Bristol Group's helicopters. This would be looked at to see if it was transferable to a SeaFire's undercarriage. If this went well, the consensus was that this should be produced to replace the Sea Hurricane. To equip the fighter squadrons through 1941 and into 1942 500 of the type would need to be ordered.
Hawker’s chief designer Sydney Cam was working on two new aircraft, one piston and one jet. The piston engined Tempest would replace the Hurribombers that had been doing such sterling work. The Tempest would have the Hercules III initially until the new Bristol Centaurus engines were available in 1941. It was felt that a radial engine was better for ground attack aircraft than the inline Merlins. The Sea Tempest would be evaluated, and hopefully be more like a Sea Fury when produced, so three prototypes were ordered for evaluation. If successful 200 of these would be ordered initially, growing to 600+ if it was a suitable replacement for the SeaFire.
Cam’s work on a Hunter, and a navalised SeaHunter, was dependant on Rolls Royce work on getting the Avon jet engine to a satisfactory level. There was no sign of this appearing until at least 1942, but hopefully when the Implacable and Indefatigable were commissioned there would jet aircraft for them to carry.
The Swordfish were the back bone of the 18 torpedo squadrons and were being upgraded with a more powerful engine, enclosed cockpit, ASW radar etc. These would serve until the Barracuda would be ready. The prototype had shown that there would have to some changes to it, including fitting the Merlin 45. Realistically it would need the Griffon engine to really give it the power it needed. The Barracuda would have three roles: the classic torpedo bomber, a submarine hunter, and the platform for a new anti-ship glide bomb that was being developed. 500 Barracudas would be needed.
The Skua was still being used as a dive bomber, and it had some limited success. The last Skua had been delivered in 1939. Retrofitting one of these with a bigger engine was attempted, but for little reward. To replace the Skua there were three British contenders. Hawker were promoting their Henley, though half-heartedly, their order books were already full. There was a new design from Boulton Paul which was basically a redesigned Defiant for carrier use and for dive bombing. Martin-Baker’s design, based around their MB2, which they called the Cormorant dive bomber, was also being looked at, using a Hercules engine. The French were experimenting with the LN42, powered by a Merlin 45, and that was a contender for the task too. Until a real contender came forward, the Skua would need to soldier on. Prototypes of the Boulton Paul, the Martin Baker and the LN42 were ordered for assessment.
8 August 1940. Central Interpretation Unit, Paris. France
The disappearance of Panzer Group Kleist had been the subject of all-out effort by intelligence, photoreconnaissance and photo-interpretation. Sarah Oliver, one of the WAAFs, finally made the breakthrough. One of the Spitfires from 212 Squadron had gone further afield as the search continued, and combination of good flying, good weather and good luck had found the panzers at Bergen training area near Celle. The photographs showed that they were involved in what looked like a large exercise. From this it was speculated, that having been rebuilt in the Koln area, they were now undergoing fresh training.
Further flights (at the cost of three lost Spitfires) managed to put some meat on to these bones. From what could be seen, the Panzers were nearly all IIIs and IVs, some IIs were found, but by the accompanying vehicles, probably only in reconnaissance units. There also seemed to be a lot more infantry around than would have been expected from just the Panzer and Motorised Infantry Divisions exercising together.
The order then went out to all Entente forces that they could reduce their threat level, and the RAF and AdA were asked about paying a visit to the exercise some night, just to help with its realism. The RAF’s own reconnaissance of the area suggested that there was very little likelihood of hitting anything significant. The Germans seemed not to be concentrated anywhere, almost as if they were expecting such an air raid. The RAF would prefer continuing attacks on enemy airfields and transport hubs. The AdA likewise didn’t feel it was a worthwhile target, and would continue to support the army along the Meuse and interdict German supplies moving to the front.
9 August 1940. Reusel. Holland.
Gun Sergeant John Foxwell and his team were running through the drills again. His brand new 25-pdr gun had been delivered two weeks ago, and every member of ‘C’ Troop 9/17 Battery, and indeed all of 7th Field Regiment were learning all about their new weapons. The other two 3rd Infantry Division’s RA regiments (3rd & 76th) had also received the new guns. The factories at home were producing over a hundred guns a month, with new factories being opened that number was about to rise to 200 per month. Each Infantry Division needed 72 of them, so the more that could be produced the better.
Foxwell, as the Gun Sergeant, was No 1, the detachment commander. No 2 operated the breech and rammed the shell. No 3 was the gun layer, No 4 loaded the brass cartridge propelling charge, No 5 brought the ammunition to the gun. No 6, Corporal Andy Kennedy, as second in command, was responsible for preparing the ammunition and operating the fuze indicator. Over the last few days, Foxwell had ran the drills with each member of the crew taking a different part, so that if anyone was unable to fulfil their assigned role, the gun could continue operating. They knew they could keep up the intense rate of fire (5 rpm) for a short time with five men, the rapid rate of fire (4rpm) with four. Once the crew was down to three, they would only manage a slow (2 rpm) rate. But each member of the crew could now act in each job, and Foxwell was happy with that.
Under normal circumstances though he had Gunner Adam Boyd in the No 5 role, as he was the biggest lad, and found carrying the ammunition least tiring. Gunner Bill Sinclair was normally No 2, as he was the most dexterous, he found opening the breech and ramming home the shell to be straightforward. Gunner Peter Walker (acting as No 3), who excelled as the gun layer but always struggled with the operating the breech for some reason. Gunner Roger Fleming (No 4) had a good rhythm going with Bill Sinclair, so that the shell and the charge were rammed home in jig time. Corporal Andy Kennedy was solid as a rock and had good hands for getting the fuzes set correctly. Altogether, Foxwell thought he probably had the best team in the battery, if not the Regiment.
His confidence in his men was soon to be put to the test. 3rd Division’s new artillery were going to have their first full Division live fire exercise. The plan was to move from their current position to another about a mile north, and then rain down hell on a large lake called Het Goorven. Interestingly they were accompanied by 17th Field Company Royal Engineers, who would be testing out some of their new equipment. They called them JCBs, though nobody could figure out what JCB stood for. It was a new kind of tractor with a loader scoop in the front and a backhoe at the back. The tractor itself was based on the David Brown Aircraft tractor, with a more powerful engine. It had an enclosed cab which was partly armoured.
At the appointed hour Foxwell supervised the hitching of the 25-pdr to the ammunition trailer (Trailer, Artillery, No 27), the driver reversed the Morris Quad 4x4 artillery tractor and the trailer was quickly hitched to the tractor, the crew jumped aboard and, keeping a proper distance from the other vehicles in the battery, followed Captain Riddel’s vehicle. When they reached the new battery position, while Foxwell and the crew were unhitching the gun and trailer, the Royal Engineers quickly dug out a gun position with the back hoe, smoothing out the soil with the front loader. Foxwell got the gun into position and he was the first in the battery to signal “ready to fire”. In due course, the target was announced, with range and bearing, then came the order: intense fire. Seventy-two guns barked in unison, corrections were given by the observer, and the Division’s guns fired off five rounds in a minute, before the order to cease fire was given.
The rush was then on to limber up again and move to a secondary position, once more prepared by the Engineers, and do it all again. This was done as efficiently as possible. When they had finished, they were given the all clear from the exercise, and a “well done” from the Divisional commander as well as the Regimental commander. Foxwell got the men onto to cleaning the gun and refilling the ready locker. They could rest and have a brew when the work was done to his satisfaction.
9 August 1940. Defence Committee of the War Cabinet. Whitehall. London
Winston Churchill: Gentlemen, the Third Lord of the Admiralty has presented the plans for the 1941 and 1942 building programme for the Royal Navy for our approval. What do you make of it Admiral Grose?
Vice-Admiral Alan Grose: Prime Minister a great deal of work has gone into it, and regarding the escort vessels and other smaller vessels it is fine. Regarding the Battle destroyers, I think that three or four flotillas a year would be better than two. Each of the new carriers will likely need at least one flotilla with it. As you know, the increase in aircraft carriers, both in number and in size will be the most important for our long term security. Having only two of a particular type of aircraft carrier is problematic because of the need for maintenance and refit cycles could leave you without an available carrier when you most need it. The two Centaurs and one Malta proposed for each of the two years is going to leave us short.
My advice, from experience, is that we should aim to have three Centaurs each of the two years, and in 1941 two Malta sized vessels, and one, but preferably two the following year. I realise that might seem excessive, but you need to think about Home fleet, the Mediterranean and Indian Ocean fleets and the East Indies. Four large carriers lets you have two or three at these stations at any one time, supported by at least one Centaur and either an Illustrious or Implacable. That gives the fleet commanders a potent defensive and, crucially, offensive capability.
Obviously something has to give, and as you know in my history the Lion class battleships were never built, it was clear by 1942 that building battleships would be irrelevant. We will soon have five modern KGVs that should have a service life of up to thirty years if we need them. These are all going to have vastly improved anti-aircraft weaponry, as well as excellent radar and fire control systems that will give them edge in any possible fight.
The Graf Spee and Royal Oak were lost to torpedoes without any warning. Give the navy a good balance of submarines, aircraft carriers protected by good ASW escorts, with a few battleships for command and control, heavy anti-aircraft weaponry and shore bombardment, and Britannia will continue to rule the waves for the foreseeable future.
Winston Churchill: What about the Vanguard? Surely it is worth proceeding with that, even two of them?
Grose: The question Prime Minister is about resources. While the 15-inch guns are lying around and that would hasten the building process, so much steel and labour would be put into a Vanguard, which would be better employed in destroyers and frigates. Why not put the 15-inch guns in Gibraltar, Malta and Singapore? That will raise the morale of those three crucial ports. If it was me, carry on working on the 16-inch guns for Lions, so that in 1944 or 1945, if it looks like we’ll have to make up for losses or replace some of the older battlewagons, then consider building the Lions or Vanguards then. Send the Hood off for a major refit and that will keep her going well into the 1950s.
Winston Churchill: You are asking for a great deal of faith in you, Admiral. If the Americans ask why we’ve stopped building battleships, when they have these massive Iowa class ships ordered, what should we tell them? ‘They are a waste of resources?’ The new Italian battleships, the Soviets are proposing new battleships, or these monstrous Japanese ships, even the French are still building battleships, but the Royal Navy, alone among the great naval powers, have ditched the queen of the seas!
Grose: Prime Minister may I remind you of the briefing papers you have been given of how history worked out regarding the demise of the battleship as the queen of the seas. The Italian battleships were attacked by biplanes from Royal Navy carriers and either sunk or withdrawn. The Japanese monsters were sunk by airpower alone. The American Pacific fleet was devastated by Japanese aircraft from carriers, who learned how to do it from us. The German fleet is already kaput, and the remnant are currently hiding in the Baltic. The Soviets can be bottled up easily. Even our own losses in heavies from my history – Barham and Royal Oak sunk by submarine launched torpedoes, Prince of Wales and Repulse sunk by air launched torpedoes, the monitor Terror sunk by damage caused by divebombers, only the Hood was sunk by direct fire from another ship, the Bismark. The main aircraft carriers that were lost, HMS Eagle, Courageous and Ark Royal were all down to submarines, Hermes to a Japanese air attack. Only HMS Glorious was lost to enemy surface action that was an appalling failure on the part of her Captain.
So we need good AAA on all vessels, good ASW protection for our heavies and carriers, and good aircraft to defend the carrier task forces. Concentrate on these three priorities and we’ll do well.
Churchill: I know, you’ve told me all this so many times, but there is just something about a battleship that nothing else can match.
First Sea Lord Dudley Pound: I love a battleship as much as the next man, Prime Minister, and it would seem that so do many of my colleagues, especially in the Third Sea Lord’s department. Perhaps Bruce Fraser felt he had to keep the battleship men happy after Reginald Henderson’s emphasis on carriers. However, I would agree with Grose, and leave the battleships off the list until 1943 or 1944, when we can look at them again. If were to lose a couple of the carriers, especially the newer ones, we’d be hamstrung. I would cancel the Lions and the Vanguard, and let’s have 6 Centaurs and 4 Malta class instead. Ditto, the Submarines, give me a fleet of Onyx diesel-electric boats, and nobody will be able to take us on. If the Americans say anything, just remind them that the Royal Navy is always at the cutting edge of development of naval warfare.
Churchill: Even I can see the writing on the wall. Let it be then, though don’t think I’ll forget about the battleships come 1943. As the First Sea Lord says, increase the carriers, submarines and destroyers, cancel the battleships altogether at this point and free up the slipways. We won’t cancel work on the 16-inch guns just in case. Go ahead also with the amphibious capability, I like the idea of these hovercraft thingies.
9 August 1940 Alfred Herbert Company (Machine Tool Manufacturer). Coventry.
Production Manager: Mr Herbert there’s a bit of a problem on the shop floor that you really ought to know about, sir.
Alfred Herbert (Chairman of the company): It’s about the women, isn’t it?
PM: Yes sir, it is. The chief shop steward has ordered the men to down tools until, and I quote, “the lassies go back to making tea and typing, which is all they’re good for”. Then he added some other things that were quite lewd and embarrassed the girls no end. They’ve walked out too, they’re not prepared to take that kind of smutty talk they said.
AH: That man’s a bloody communist too, so much for the rights of workers. Right, bring him in here, and we’ll have this out, one way or another. (Picks up telephone)…
Chief Shop Steward: “Mr Herbert, you will not be diluting the skilled workers in this plant with these unskilled women. How do you imagine an eight week course makes someone a “machinist”? Apprentices should learn the trade from the ground up and then become “skilled men.” These women are no more than scabs, brought in to break the union and bring wages down and your profits up.”
AH: Are you quite aware of the priority for getting these machine tools out to the tank manufacturers, so that our boys at the front can take on the Nazis? You realise, that if our order is not fulfilled on time, not only is there a financial penalty, but very serious questions will be asked about “sabotaging the war effort” and “supporting the enemy in time of war”?
CSS: This imperialist war is nothing more than a “get rich quick” scheme for capital; the workers are either called up as cannon fodder or stitched up to work longer hours for less pay.
AH: You know perfectly well that wages have increased since the war began, and the women are being paid as unskilled workers to keep your members happy. Now, either your members get back to work, and are civil and polite to our new members of staff, or we will have to explain this to the Controller General at the Ministry of Supply.
CSS: You go ahead and run to the government, my workers will not be diluted by a bunch of women.
AH: Very well, if that it is how it is, we shall leave it there, for the moment. (Picks up phone as CSS leaves).
10 August 1940. Alfred Herbert Company (Machine Tool Manufacturer). Coventry.
Tannoy announcement: All employees will report immediately to the cafeteria. I repeat, all employees to the cafeteria.
General hubbub falls to silence as Albert Herbert comes to raised dais along with a police officer and a man from the Ministry of supply.
AH: “Ladies and Gentlemen. This gentleman is from the Ministry of Supply and would like to say a few words.”
MofS: “Thank you Mr Herbert. As you know your current order for machine tools is to build turret lathes for new tanks. Due to the nature of this order, and its importance I have the pleasure of reading the following letter: “Hardly any part of our common organisation of war production had been more thoroughly and precisely examined than the question of machine tools. Adequate supplies of machine tools are central to the whole question of industrial supply, and no one can be engaged in munitions production for one day without feeling that they were the ganglion nerve centre of the whole supply. In consequence, it is the earnest desire of the whole nation for victory that compels us to urge you on to the highest level of productivity, allowing nothing to hinder our efforts. Once more the women of Britain, as they did in the last war, have rolled up their sleeves and taken their men’s places at the work bench to arm those men to overcome our foe. They deserve nothing but respect and honour for doing their duty to King and country, just as their husbands and sons are doing their duty on land, at sea and in the sky. I anticipate that their arrival in your factory will be one more step on the road to victory. Yours sincerely. Winston Churchill, Prime Minister.”
Some of the workers clapped and cheered, led by the new women workers, others, wondering why the chief and other senior shop stewards weren’t present, but a policeman was, kept their hands folded.
AH: The Prime Minister himself has taken a personal interest in our company, and had intimated a desire to visit us when the pressures of office allow. Now, on a more negative note, Sergeant Black is here to inform us of some important information.
Sergeant Black: Ladies and Gentlemen, it has come to the attention of His Majesty’s Constabulary that there have been certain acts of sabotage, and even allegations of treason among the workforce here. (Audible intake of breath from the assembly). A number of arrests were made early this morning and some of your co-workers are helping us with enquiries. We hope this will all be resolved very soon, and that these allegations have no grounds. However, the Home Office have instructed us that any acts that harm productivity in essential industries are to be investigated most seriously and any saboteurs or anyone found guilty of aiding or abetting the enemy is to feel the full force of the law. That is all.
AH: Thank you Sergeant, I don’t think you could have made that any clearer. Now, with the Prime Minister taking personal interest in us completing our order in full and on time, the board have decided that, should we complete our order in full and ahead of schedule, a bonus will be paid to every worker. It is therefore in all our best interests to integrate our new workers as quickly as possible so that our men can have the tanks they need to take Berlin. (Fairly enthusiastic cheering from the majority of workers).
10 August 1940. Ministry of Supply. London
Official 1: So, did the carrot and stick work at Herberts?
Official 2: It seems to have done. A few other arrests have been made at other firms for similar “crimes”. Whoever came up with the idea of having the Prime Minister write those standard letters was a genius.
Official 3: I heard it was one of those men from Bristol.
Official 1: Really? Remember, “Loose lips sink ships”, and careers. Now, with that mini-crisis over, how are we doing overall for machine tools?
Official 3: We’ve been around all the small and medium sized engineering firms and have managed to organise them to either take in sub-contact work, or supply directly to users. This should increase overall production of machine tools by 33%. The established firms like Herberts, Churchill-Redman, Adcock & Shipley are all at full stretch, and productivity should rise as more workers, like the women in Coventry, make up manpower shortfalls. Should we still call it manpower if women work there too?
Official 2: Don’t start trying to confuse us. Does a man-eating tiger only eat men?
Official 3: The American imports of the tools we ordered in 1939 are still not fully delivered. Part of the shortfall is the Americans not fulfilling their contracts.
Official 2: It looks like the yanks are using the tools we bought and paid for to expand their own increase in manufacturing. No doubt we’ll get them eventually, but it is hardly cricket.
Official 3: I thought they played baseball over there, not cricket.
Official 1: (rolls eyes) It seems the French are complaining too. The joint purchasing team in Washington are kicking up a fuss. We are on target to have made 62000 machine tools from September 39 to 1940, that’s more than at any other time in our history. The shortfalls come from the loss of the German imports and the lateness of the American imports. We should have received 33000 from America, but only half of that has arrived. The target for next year is 81000 to be produced here, with 32000 imported from America.
Official 2: The other problem is spare parts. If something goes wrong with the American machines, we have to import replacement parts from the USA, with all the inherent problems that entails. We should be looking at some of the companies to duplicate the American machines so that we can be less dependent.
Official 3: Certainly, there are American machines, and German ones, that none of our companies make, especially some very specialised equipment. Though we might not want to open ourselves to charges of breaching patents law.
Official 1: Don’t you know there’s a war on? I’d rather face American lawyers than Gestapo goons.
10 August 1940. Ministry of Supply. Shell Mex House, The Strand. London.
Official 1: The loss of Denmark and Holland has meant that our butter, bacon and egg imports have fallen dramatically. Butter is down about 45%, bacon 75% and fresh eggs about the same. We’ve also lost 25% of our fresh or preserved vegetables.
Official 2: Fresh, preserved and tinned fruit are all fine. Beef and Lamb too are fine, almost unaffected.
Official 1: That’s all very well, but we can’t have an English breakfast without bacon and eggs. The home front’s efforts to reduce consumption and increase supply will help, but we are going to have to get these proteins from somewhere else, and that probably means the USA, which means more dollars.
Official 2: Canada is already providing a great deal of our grains, might they be persuaded to go into the pig and poultry business? What about the Republic of Ireland? Their imports will be struggling too, how are they going to cope?
Official 1: Not really out concern. Now, what’s next?
Official 3: Timber is a huge problem. Pit props for the mines, railway sleepers and sawn softwood for construction came mostly from the Baltic. That is all gone. The Forestry Commission think we have enough timber resources to meet the shortfall, but that will need many more workers.
Official 1: Didn’t women work in forestry in the Great War?
Official 2: Yes, the Women’s Timber Service if I remember correctly. I think it may need to be resurrected. The problem with importing from Canada or wherever is the sheer bulk. If Norway could ship it from its ports, that might solve some of the problems, but I agree, home produced should be prioritised.
Official 1: Is it just me, or is the problem with prioritising everything, just mean that everything just gets done at the same rate?
Official 2: Iron ore is fine, Sweden, Tunis, Algeria, France and Norway are all continuing to meet our needs, we’re paying a bit more for Swedish ores, but it is better quality and selling it us means it’s not available to the Germans. Belgium and France are providing some iron and steel, which is helping our own shortfall, but the new foundries should be ready next year.
Official 1: How are negotiations with the Turks going for metal ores?
Official 2: I believe the phrase is ‘poorly’.
Official 3: Oil next. The Norwegian fleet of tankers, plus our own is keeping the movement of oil from the Middle East at normal rates. The Suez Canal and Mediterranean routes are fine, so there’s no problem there. In terms of refining, we’re increasing production of 100+ octane petrol, and we are more than adequately meeting the RAF’s needs. We are going to have to increase the supply of diesel for a lot of these new engines that are coming into production.
Official 2: At least that is less dollars. Now exports. We don’t want the balance to trade to get too out of kilter.
Official 1: The first problem is munitions. We were the largest exporter of munitions before the war, but now so much of it is being used for ourselves, that is going to count against us. Secondly coal, which is fine, our biggest customer, France, still is buying it up in increased quantities. Third consumer goods. This is going to be a problem as much of manufacturing gears up for war. We really need a couple of inventions that we can make easily and break into the American market. Whiskey, linen goods, and the usual things will find themselves squeezed if we aren’t careful.
Official 2: What’s that phrase Winston has been using? “We don’t want to win the war and lose the peace.”
10 August 1940. Ministry of Labour. London
Official 1: In summary, from June 1939 and June 1940 the employable population increase was by 926,000 workers, of whom rather more than half were women. In addition, about 625,000 persons previously unemployed were taken into industrial employment or into the Armed Forces. Now the Forces and civil defence have called up two million more, but there is still some unemployment, and more women ready to enter the workforce. The problems are not so much a labour shortage, as shortage of particularly skilled workers at specific industries.
Official 2: Am I right in thinking that 44% of men and 73% of women are still employed in group III industries?
Official 1: Yes, but that is changing slowly, last June it was 49% and 77% respectively. It has to be said that these industries and services are important for the well-being of the civilian population. The 4% move in men was to the munitions industries (engineering and chemical) and the other 1% to things like shipping, transport, mining, agriculture, public services, etc.
Official 3: There are still likely to be some problems. Although the reserved occupations have meant that essential workers haven’t been called up to the Armed Forces, there have been a number of volunteers who have gone to the forces. There are a couple of collieries in Yorkshire and South Wales that have been left short of workers because of this.
Official 2: The armed forces do need skilled men too, you know.
Official 3: True, but if we continue with our current planned expansion, we run the risk of labour shortages, if not next year, then certainly in 1942.
Official 1: I’ll speak to Mr Bevin and see if we can look at ways of preventing that before it happens. We may have to have a conscription of men and women into industry as well as the armed forces.
Official 2: You can’t send women down the pits.
Official 1: No, but without coal there’s no power, and if there’s no power, there’s no production, and if there’s no production, there’s no victory. Maybe we need a regiment of miners.
Official 3: The National Union of Mineworkers would love that! The other problem is in the electronics sector. There has already been a large expansion in this area, and it looks like this will carry on. There is a severe lack of trained people. Pye, Metropolitan Vickers and Cossor are all screaming for new recruits. Each of the companies have a training programme that give the new employees an introduction to electronics, but it may be that this is something we should get involved with. Call it a Government Retraining Scheme. If we take people coming to the workplace for the first time, have something like a two-month course. Courses on electronics, precision engineering, welding, and so on. It means that the companies can get people onto the production line faster.
Official 2: Not a bad idea, but who provides the training?
Official 3: We could ask the firms themselves. They obviously are having to do it in-house anyway, so if three of four companies provided a few trainers, they would also get the benefits of first choices of the new intake. Academia might help, we could ask the universities for some lecturers to do some of the theoretical stuff. Trigonometry for engineers, that kind of thing. It would have to be regional of course. An educated workforce will become more and more essential.
Official 1: I like the idea, put it down on paper and I’ll take it to Mr Bevin.
Official 2: Can we move on to farming? I got a memo from the Ministry of Supply who are worried about imports of timber and some foodstuffs. They are suggesting we reinstate the Women’s Timber Service. Just when you mentioned a regiment of miners, we will need women to work on farms and in forestry as well as industry. A women’s land army perhaps?
Official 1: Likewise, give me idea on paper and I’ll show it to Mr Bevin. That’s a good name for it, Women’s Land Army. I suppose we’ll have to call the Women’s Timber Service something more martial, Women’s Timber Corps? Something like that. They’ll probably just be known as Timber Jills or something daft. Is that everything? I believe Doris might have some biscuits with the tea today, let’s get on before they’re all gone.
10 August 1940. Luftwaffe Headquarters. Berlin. Germany.
Goring was something of a new man in the last few months. After his terrible mistake in May, and the humiliation he had received, along with the humiliation of his beloved Luftwaffe, he had pulled himself together somewhat. He had lost some weight, was avoiding his “medicines” and was feeling the better for it. A degree of the pomposity was still evident, but he was certainly more lucid and focused.
The latest figures of aircraft production were being discussed. Over all types, 650 aircraft were being built per month. But that was a total of 20 different types, from reconnaissance to seaplanes, bomber to fighters. Over 230 bombers and fighters per month were being produced by the factories. The majority of bombers were Ju88s (150) and fighters Bf109s (130). The Ju88s were also being produced as reconnaissance and heavy fighter variants. Me110s were still being produced, though mostly for a night-fighter role. 50 Stukas were being built per month, but only 32 Ju52 transport planes, nowhere near enough to make up the losses in May.
Losses for the campaign in May and since numbered over 2200 aircraft to all causes. Pilots and aircrew losses were also a major concern, the reserves were thinning down quite fast. New pilot training wasn’t keeping pace with the need for replacements. All too often newly trained pilots were being thrown into the fray without adequate experience and taking disproportionate losses.
In terms of new aircraft the Bf 109F was nearly ready for production, the first squadrons expected to receive it for evaluation and transition next month, it should roll out to most squadrons in January. The Fw190 was expected to enter production in June 1941, pre-production models were being tested and there was still some debate about the wing size. Hopes to replace the Me110 with the Me210 were proving to be a costly failure, the prototypes were displaying very poor, if not dangerous flight characteristics. Likewise, the Henschel 129 ground attack aircraft was proving to be less than desirable. The Fw 189 reconnaissance aircraft was about to enter production, for service in 1941. The Dornier Do215, a longer range reconnaissance aircraft was about to equip its first squadron. The long-range bomber, Heinkel He177 was having terrible problems that probably wouldn’t be ironed out until 1942. Jets were being worked on by BMW and Junkers but progress was slow, mostly because of a lack of specialised metals.
Goring listened to all this with a feeling of despondency. The British had improved their Spitfire so that it now had a clear advantage over the Bf109E, and even the F would struggle against it. They had taken the Hurricane, a mediocre fighter and turned it into an excellent ground attack aircraft. The French seemed to be improving too, though less quickly, but the American aircraft they were using were quite good. Udet seemed to get nothing right, the aircraft industry was hamstrung for various reasons, not least chopping and changing specifications, especially about dive bombing which was Udet’s answer to everything. Too many poor designs were being touted and wasting resources. After what had happened in May, he couldn’t lie to Hitler again, even to tell him what he wanted to hear.
Goring interrupted Udet who was attempting to show that the Luftwaffe’s progress was clear and in the right direction. Goring made some simple choices. First cancel all further production of the Me110, and cancel the Me210 completely. All that production was to be transferred to the Bf109 and they had better be ready to improve it again next year. The Fw190 looked like a good aircraft and should be put into production as soon as possible. It looked like it might do a job similar to the Hurribomber, so Focke-Wolf were to make a ground attack version as well as a fighter. The Henschel 129 would be cancelled and production made available for the Fw190. The Ju88 was to be primary bomber. The Heinkel 111 would continue in production for now, but they had better get the He177 fixed and ready as soon as possible. Stukas were a failure and so production should cease, the Fw190 would do the job. The lack of transport aircraft was critical. Since Junkers were concentrating on the Ju88s, Dornier would take over from Junkers and build Ju52s.
Goring got up and walked out the room, the staff shocked at the drastic measures that they had just been handed. Udet ran to catch up with Goring to try to speak to him, but Goring dismissed him, “Go and do what I have said.”
11 August 1940 RNAS Yeovilton.
Frank Halford (Chief designer, Napier & Sons) and his team of engineers did the final checks on their copy of the gnome turboprop engines that were mated for the first test flight of the new Westland Helicopter they were calling the Sussex. It was copied from the Wessex, but there were enough differences that it really deserved another name. Like the Wildcat that had flown in June, the Sussex was simpler and slightly smaller than the aircraft it was copied from. If everything went well, the production models would be more sophisticated, but this prototype was just the flying machine.
Two Wessex HU5 had arrived back on the Olna, one had been used to train new pilots for the Fleet Air Arm, the other had been dismantled to be the design blueprint for the new aircraft that were copying it. For today’s first flight the Wessex pilot, David Salter, with greater experience on the Wessex was the main stick and Harald Penrose, Westland’s chief test pilot was co-pilot. Although it had been thoroughly checked over by everybody, still Salter and Penrose did a full walk around as a final check, after all it was their lives at risk. Clambering over the aircraft they checked oil levels, hatches properly closed and so on. Having completed the procedure, they put on their helmets (something of a novelty to Penrose) and Salter climbed up into the cockpit. Sliding the door shut, he adjusted the height of the seat, strapped himself in and fiddled with the pedals. In front of him were an array of switches, knobs and dials, so flicking on the battery switch, he checked the microphones with Penrose. “How do you read, Harald?” “Loud and clear”, “Loud and clear also.” “Ground power in please.” The ground crew plugged the lead from the battery kit into the side of the Sussex, just below the exhaust pipe.
Salter’s hands and eyes ran over the switches on the central console, preparing the electrics for start-up. Next came the radio check, the whole flight was being recorded in case anything went wrong. Salter had a good look over every dial, running from left to right. Engine gauges, fuel flow meters, torque, the flight instruments. With a waggle of the two sticks, cyclic in the right hand and collective in the left, a good kick on both pedals, he was ready to start.
“Starting port”, “Roger”. He pressed the starter button down and held it. Beneath Penrose’s feet the engine wound up slowly, while it waited for ignition, the ignition unit crackers brought the engine to life with a roar from the port exhaust. He had his hand over the fuel cut off in case the temperature went too high, but it rose rapidly and then dropped back as the increased airflow cooled things down. Increasing the throttle slightly the generators come on line, and Salter called for the ground power to be unplugged. Checking all was well, he then repeated the procedure for the starboard engine under his own feet.
Circling his finger in the air to the ground crew, who checked around, as seeing all was clear, gave the same signal back. “Engaging rotors” Salter engaged the rotors by easing the rotor brake off, checking it was locked off. The starboard engine was now driving the four rotors, so he moved the speed select lever slowly forward, the blades sped up. As the rotors reached flying speed, he put the port engine into drive, and advanced that speed lever too. Tweaking both levers to balance the fuel flow to the Gnome engines which were now taking equal strain.
A full check of the hydraulic system followed, so they were ready to take the helicopter on its first flight. Calling out the final pre-flight checks, he prepared for launch with a final adjustment of the friction in the collective lever. “X-Ray Lima now lifting off”. Gently easing up the collective lever, pushing his left foot forward slowly, the cyclic stick was gently pulled slightly left and back. They could feel the undercarriage starting to lift as the blades took the strain. Using the controls, he felt for the balance needed to keep the aircraft pointed straight and to lift it vertically. The starboard wheel left the ground, followed by the port, finally the tail wheel, as a little extra power on the collective helped them rise about the ground. He eased off the power then and hovered at fifteen feet to check once again that all the systems were working well. Once it was clear that everything was working normally, he applied more power and increased height to 200 feet. It was at this point that the red warning light on the panel started to flash. The tail rotor failed.
Salter was well practiced on autorotation. Rather than trying to do anything about the system, he knew he had about one second to dump the collective lever to prevent the rotor blades dragging and losing their speed. As they started to descent rapidly, he eased back on the cyclic to raise the nose and try to slow the rate of descent, giving the blades a bit of extra momentum as the wind through them increased. About 10 feet from the ground, he hauled on the collective lever to use all the remaining momentum to cushion the landing. The Sussex weighed the best part of six tons, so “cushion” the landing was a relative concept.
As soon as the chopper was stationary, they both unbuckled and jumped out as quickly as they could. Penrose noted afterwards that Salter had, probably without thinking about it, switched off all the fuel and power switches during their descent. There was still the danger of fire, but the aircraft had been saved by Salters extensive training. Penrose was sure that if he had been the pilot, it would not have ended as well. Although they had practiced for such an emergency, Salter did things on instinct that Penrose would have to think about, therefore taking longer.
The undercarriage was completely broken, taking the brunt of the crash, but otherwise the Sussex’s damage was minimal. The investigation found that a link to the rear rotor had sheared, causing the failure. All the links would have to be checked again, but it was found that this one was a failure in the casting, fatally weakening the metal. The company who produced the metal castings would have to be reproached and would have to put far better quality control measures into place.
The Sussex project was grounded for a month, though testing of other systems was continued. Production would probably have to be delayed, but no one was surprised that there should be delays. It was important that when they were delivered that they would be fit for purpose.
(The descripting of helicopter flying and emergency procedures in this update is largely taken from the book “Scram!”, by Harry Benson, Preface Publishing, London 2012)
12 August 1940. Office of Charles Hopkins. “Director of Naval Land Equipment.”
“Miss Sinclair, please take a letter:
For the attention of the Prime Minister.
Naval Land Equipment, Report of Progress No 11.
Since the last progress report, No 10, dated 12 July 1940, I note that work on the Cultivator No 6 has been downgraded in priority from the highest to 1(b), and that the number of machines on order has been reduced to thirty-three, from 240.
The two types of earth moving machines, or moles, narrow (infantry) and wide (officer), are currently awaiting the delivery of essential parts. The successful test of April 17 this year proved the ability of the rig to cut a trench over three feet wide and three feet six inches deep, which the finished machines will increase to a depth of five feet and seven and a half feet wide, moving at half a mile an hour. Our hope of having full working prototype is currently meeting with two main problems.
Ruston-Bucyrus of Lincoln, the firm which is designing the machines, and building the cutting section of the mole are progressing very well. However, what is hampering progress most of all is the inability to get a proper supply of armour and engines. On approaching the steel foundries, the 1(b) classification of the work means that the armour we need is currently being prioritised for the tank manufacturers. If the machines are to be effective, they will need to be very heavily protected, much more than the current infantry tanks. But we cannot make progress towards a prototype without access to armour. Even efforts to make a light steel prototype are hampered by the lack of priority.
I visited Rolls-Royce in March to place an order for 200 marine versions of the Merlin engines by the end of the year, with another 20 to 40 spares for June 1941. They told me, in no uncertain terms, that all their output is currently spoken for, and they have no spare capacity. I have to say that I found their attitude towards this department quite abrasive, claiming that fulfilling our order would mean 200 fewer fighter aircraft.
Since then I have explored of the possibility of replacing the Merlins with Paxman-Ricardo diesels, but these will need two per machine, where the Merlins would be able to power them individually. With the reduction in the number of Cultivators on order, the production of 100 diesels of this size within the timeframe may be possible, but only if it is approved by the Ministry of Supply.
Ruston-Bucyrus estimate that each Cultivator will require 36000 components, 71 assemblies and over 250 suppliers, in addition to the 83 tons of steel needed for construction. With the increase in tank manufacture many of the suppliers who would produce these components for the Cultivators are currently being used for the production of tanks, and those we have spoken to say they do not have the ability to expand capacity to meet the orders we would like to put to them. Ruston-Bucyrus are also concerned that they will not have the necessary skilled workforce if subcontracting work has to be kept in house.
In summary, the downgrading of this project has made the possibility of completing the order for the spring of 1941 almost impossible to achieve. If these great machines of war are to break open the German defensive positions and clear the way for our infantry and tanks, then they will need to be given higher priority, which of course will interfere with the production of tanks and fighter aircraft.
I remain your humble servant,
Charles H Hopkins. Director of Naval Land Equipment.
Thank you Miss Sinclair, have that ready for review and signing by the end of the day, if you please. That is all.”