Effects of the Serbian Offensive on the Eastern Front
When the Serbian preparations for their final offensive were underway, Austria-Hungary captured the city of Lvov, the Galician capital and 4th largest city of the Austrian-Hungarian Empire on 22 June and Russian orders for retreat began on 27 June. With this loss, which meant that most of Galicia had returned to Austrian hands, the lines stabilized in the south. The penetration progressed about 160 km (99 mi) at its deepest, reducing the Polish salient to about half of its pre-war size. However, the Serbian offensive would temporarily deprieve Austria-Hungary of its gains as the 7th Army was sent southwards to avert the Serbian offensive and deter Romanian intervention now that the 5th Army was fighting the Italians on the Isonzo Front. Although the Russian threat to Hungary was averted, the Balkan threat only resurfaced in the wake of the Austro-Hungarian offensive in the east, focus on Italy and negligence of Balkan defences following the shift in priorities and led to the offensive.
From the book https://books.google.com.my/books?id=qIEdKnC2YuAC&pg=PA102&dq=gorlice+tarnow&source=gbs_toc_r&cad=4#v=onepage&q=gorlice%20tarnow&f=false:
When the Serbian preparations for their final offensive were underway, Austria-Hungary captured the city of Lvov, the Galician capital and 4th largest city of the Austrian-Hungarian Empire on 22 June and Russian orders for retreat began on 27 June. With this loss, which meant that most of Galicia had returned to Austrian hands, the lines stabilized in the south. The penetration progressed about 160 km (99 mi) at its deepest, reducing the Polish salient to about half of its pre-war size. However, the Serbian offensive would temporarily deprieve Austria-Hungary of its gains as the 7th Army was sent southwards to avert the Serbian offensive and deter Romanian intervention now that the 5th Army was fighting the Italians on the Isonzo Front. Although the Russian threat to Hungary was averted, the Balkan threat only resurfaced in the wake of the Austro-Hungarian offensive in the east, focus on Italy and negligence of Balkan defences following the shift in priorities and led to the offensive.
From the book https://books.google.com.my/books?id=qIEdKnC2YuAC&pg=PA102&dq=gorlice+tarnow&source=gbs_toc_r&cad=4#v=onepage&q=gorlice%20tarnow&f=false:
The recovery of most of Galicia had solved a major problem. The lull in operations following Lemberg's fall had provided the Central Powers an occasion to reconsider their strategic options and the situation demanded no less.
[Western, Ottoman and Italian Fronts are similar to reality until September 1915, August 1915 and 1916 respectively.]
Like those of the neutral countries in 1914, the Bulgarian Government had competing factions for the Entente and Central Powers. Unfortunately, the senior heads were Radoslavov and Ferdinand. Both sides were suspectible to the rewards promised by the belligerent sides. Historically, Bulgaria's government always showed Russophilla streaks due to Russian assistance for the country's independence in the 1877-1878 war. This was obviously manisfested in the departure of lower ranking generals, officers and soldiers such as Radko-Dimitriev from Bulgaria for service in the Russian Army.
Even before Italy's entry, Falkenhayn was convinced that the Serbian problem could be dealt with before Italy joined the Entente and it might deter the Italians. The dangers of a Serbian Offensive was considered minimal until the 5th Austro-Hungarian Army was removed in June, given the need by Serbia to defend her eastern borders and the complicated terrains and rivers the Serbs needed to cross, however, he was wrong. In the actual event, with Italy contained and Romania quieted by events in Galicia, and realizing that significant Austrian and Bulgarian support was needed to invade Serbia without German involvement, Falkenhayn got the permission to invade Serbia after completing operations against Russia. [Rest of the stuff about Eastern Front discussions is similar to reality.]
General Staff of the 11th Army chief Hans Von Seeckt considered the possibility of encircling the Russians at Lemberg as unrealistic and decided against it, as the Russians would be able to avoid the encirclement. Once Lemberg and its surroundings were captured, he considered the 11th Army's mission accomplished. Any further missions to recover the silver of eastern Galicia still in Russian hands could be accomplished by the Austro-Hungarian 7th Army and the German South Army, however, the Serbian Offensive disrupted the strategic plans as 11th Army had to shudder the burden. With the eastern advance of the 11th Army finished, Seeckt proposed that it turn north, but only the Austro-Hungarian 2nd Army and supporting corps of the 4th Army could participate as the rest of the latter had to capture and defend Galicia from Russian counterattacks. The prospective advance would use the land bridge bordering the Bug and Vistula Rivers and depends on the crossing. The armies would advance on Lublin and Cholm. The ultimate aim was Brest-Litvosk, one of the major railway centres to eastern Poland. "Thus, a decision would be made against the Russian Western and Northwestern Fronts," concluded Seeckt.
Now that the broad plans for Central Power operations in the east were decided on, preparations could be made, albeit with slight reduction to allow the Austro-Hungarian 4th Army replace the 7th Army for Serbia. In the cases for the forces north of Lemberg, logistical difficulties had to be overcome in the preparations first. On June 26, 11th Army General Mackensen's realized that all armies in his front depended upon railroads for supply. Mosicska and Lubaczow [to the east of the cities of Przemysl and Lemberg] were the areas where the rail lines ended after crossing the San River. The double-tracked railroad line to Lemberg would not be reopened until late July to allow consolidation, repairs and denying its use in case of Russian counterattacks. It must be noted that thankfully, all of Mackensen's May and June operations were conducted within pre-war Austro-Hungarian territory, so the troops assigned to repair the railway did not have to worry about the gauge. Unfortunately, the railroads were single tracked even when repaired and this caused logistical problems in the transportation of ammunition, food, equipment, supplies and troops.
Last edited: