As to Atlantropa, I don't think we'll see it. EBR mentioned the newly formed Congo Sea having a variety of side effects, and without the personality cult of Stoker around to force the issue, I don't think they'll put the resources into another horrifically expensive mega-project.
The upcoming candidate could be the architect of the megaproject ala Moses building an Egyptian city, though.
 
The upcoming candidate could be the architect of the megaproject ala Moses building an Egyptian city, though.
That's making me think of Heusman from the Man in the High Castle series being an engineer and architect who on the surface seems like a reasonable authority figure but his demeanor hides much darker ambitions.
screen-shot-2017-01-19-at-9-29-13-am.jpg
 
Well, it seems that with each passing messages here, Atlantropa inches closer into fruition, and to a lesser extent, plausibility.

I'm liking the course this timeline is taking.

Malan.jpg
 
I'm not an expert but aren't like all of these Green Sahara, Congo Sea and Atlantropa types projects almost impossible to implement even with modern technology and would be utterly disastrous if implemented?
 

Skallagrim

Banned
Well I'm no expert but apparently the winds sweeping westward out of Africa carrier dirt and nutrients that fertilizes the Amazon.
That's very interesting. Not a potential implication of these schemes that I had previously considered. Of course, I'm not sure it holds up entirely: the Sahara has been much greener for long periods in history -- I'm not aware of ecological collapses in the Amazon basin to match those periods. Although I gather that there were extended periods that the Amazon basin was more savanna-like, and those might match up.
 
That's very interesting. Not a potential implication of these schemes that I had previously considered. Of course, I'm not sure it holds up entirely: the Sahara has been much greener for long periods in history -- I'm not aware of ecological collapses in the Amazon basin to match those periods. Although I gather that there were extended periods that the Amazon basin was more savanna-like, and those might match up.
The Amazon suddenly being reduced to Savannah in a few short decades probably wouldn't be good thing for Brazil. While the rainforest gets reduced to a fraction of what it once was.

On another note does anyone else picture the Snakes creating a lot of hydroelectricity with these projects?
You're expecting the Drakians to have some common sense.
Well it's not like they haven't already created an entirely new massive body of water in the middle of Africa.
 
I wonder has the Great Pacific War reversed most of the Post-Klein era changes to the USN? Having two competing US Navies in the form of the USN and USCG has to have bitten the US in the ass and the pressures of the war probably meant that the distinction between the Coast Guard and Navy ceased to relevant

Yep, the USA undid most of that during the war itself. The USCG and the USN were temporarily merged together, and they're trying to figure out what to do with them now that the war's over.

Typically, though, that's not how politics operate. There are a huge raft of concerns to be considered beyond the simple calculus of economies of scale and military spending. Politicians in New Zealand would be loathe to give up the powers of a national government to become a province of a much larger country. Australians don't want to assume the national debts of the NZ government. Maori New Zealanders don't want to be treated like Aboriginal Australians. And so on.

I suspect military and economic cooperation will continue to increase - but voluntary unification is an immense and difficult political step. So often we see this glossed over in TLs - "1947: New Zealand and Australia unify into the Glorious People's Republic of Oceania" - without any consideration of the political and cultural realities that would allow such as step. Look at European integration - despite strong economic and political drive, it's taken many decades to get to where they are today, and with plenty of backsteps along the way. Look at the slow unification of Germany. Look at Italy. Look at Puerto Rico and the United States.

History isn't a board game and countries aren't just territories on a map.

I think EBR has done a magnificent job of representing those realities while building from the cartoonish foundations of the Draka series, and I don't know why he'd stop now.

Well thank you. :)

The way I see it, New Zealand and Australia have pretty strong independent national identities and while some kind of Australasian Union wouldn't be impossible in a TL with the right divergence and butterflies, that's not really the situation here. The Tasman twins are pretty scared, what with the USA turning inwards and Japan and India next door, but a tight Australasian alliance isn't any noticeably weaker than an Australian Union would be.


There's not much that I can say here without giving things away, but this is some nice analysis.:)

I suspect the silver lining for the US is that they will have the superior economic ands political system in the long run. The Drakian bondage-based system is hardly conducive to dynamic free enterprise and innovation, not to mention the immense economic and political cost of repression...

Without question.

The Drakian economic system will never be as efficient or as innovative as the American one. It's telling that Drakia technology isn't known for being advanced ITTL, it's known for being robust and easy to repair (because it has to function from the Sahara Deseret to the Central African jungle) and that Drakia has only managed to compete with the rest of the world technologically by being very fast to adopt other countries' discoveries.

Starting Atlantropa would likely be a casus belli with France and Italy, and by extension the Rexist bloc and possibly the USA (which protects France) as well...

Yeah. And while the Pan-Europeans aren't in any position to start a war with Drakia, Drakia's not interested in starting a new war with Europe at the moment.

I realize this is an often debated topic with some believing that war drives innovation and as highlighted here "discoveries". The obvious counterargument here is that discoveries are equally made in peace times, if not more so, because people can experiment more freely. Dorknought provided some interesting data supporting the notion that wars kill innovation here.

It is certainly an interesting topic to debate.

My view is that war drives innovation in the short-term because governments are willing to sink large amounts of funding and resources into exploring avenues of scientific research, and developing new inventions into mature technologies because they're desperate for the next war-winning weapon. Naturally an increased investment in science yields returns. In the long-run however, remaining on a war footing limits the free sharing of ideas needed for science to flourish, and it limits the number of potential researchers and scientists by diverting able-bodied citizens into the military.

The faster technological advancement ITTL is in large part due to having war-time level investment in research during peacetime without the same degree of censorship and secrecy (a higher degree over all, but not as high you normally see during wars).

What percentage of Drakia is citizens? And where are they concentrated?

Good question. I'll try to remember to address that when we get around to discussing the Empire post-war.

Chapter 31 is coming, by the way, hopefully early next week.
 
It is certainly an interesting topic to debate.

My view is that war drives innovation in the short-term because governments are willing to sink large amounts of funding and resources into exploring avenues of scientific research, and developing new inventions into mature technologies because they're desperate for the next war-winning weapon. Naturally an increased investment in science yields returns. In the long-run however, remaining on a war footing limits the free sharing of ideas needed for science to flourish, and it limits the number of potential researchers and scientists by diverting able-bodied citizens into the military.

The faster technological advancement ITTL is in large part due to having war-time level investment in research during peacetime without the same degree of censorship and secrecy (a higher degree over all, but not as high you normally see during wars).
That may assume that government attempts at directing scientific research don't seriously dampen overall research progress, much as seen in Nazi Germany, Mao's China and the Soviet Union (though to be fair it is difficult to separate this element from the overall repression of those societies). One issue with innovation is that you can't really plan where breakthrus occur and what might have a military application or not. A great (or maybe rather tragic) example might be how the Wright brothers apperantly imagined that airplanes would lead to an era of peace.

Also, what level of world population does this timeline have compared to OTL?

If we agree that " it limits the number of potential researchers and scientists by diverting able-bodied citizens into the military", wouldn't it logically follow that an overall higher or lower population would also impact the number of potential researchers and scientists?
 

Jessicajess

Banned
Do you guys believe this Draka's treatment of their bondsmen is worse than the United States's treatment of their slaves in the Decades of Darkness TL?
 
Top