Status
Not open for further replies.
Chapter 2
42-24017617-1.jpg


Chapter 2

Artemas Ward was a profoundly different man than George Washington.

Where Washington was the first-born son of a southern aristocrat Ward was the sixth child of a middle class New Englander. Washington was a slave-owner and a career soldier, Ward flirted with teaching and later owned a small business. Washington was only grudgingly persuaded to become active in politics, while Ward felt called to public service and held a series of elected offices both before and after the Revolution, abandoning his political career only when his health forced him to. Both men were dedicated Patriots and sincere believers in the American Republic, both were popular with their troops and the fellow citizens of their nation. Artemas was more charismatic than the Virginian, Washington a superior general.

In this universe, with Washington dead to Patrick Ferguson’s bullet at the Battle of Brandywine, it is Artemas Ward who led America to victory in the Revolutionary War, gained the acclaim and adoration of the nation, and acquired the moniker “Father of the Country”. The cult of personality that made Washington uncomfortable was embraced by Ward and he needed little prompting to run in the first presidential election. While his victory was all but predetermined the Vice-Presidency was not, and a collection of different candidates sought the office- mostly southerners seeking to ensure that the South was represented in America’s first administration. Henry Lee III won a plurality, leaving the first Presidency geographically balanced between the Virginian Lee and the Massachusite Ward. The Constitution they operated under was almost identical to OTL, with only a few token differences and the absence of the 3/5ths clause- a victory by the southern states who wanted to count slaves to grant themselves greater representation in the House over northern states who didn’t want to count non-citizens at all so as to reduce southern representation. The capital also ended up remaining in New York (which served as a provisional capital OTL) as part of this deal, although a chunk of southern Manhattan was carved away from New York State to become alt-DC (roughly corresponding to what would have become the OTL Financial District).

c8AKaE8.png

Artemas Ward. Largely forgotten OTL, but Father of the Country in the Separate-verse.

Later Americans will attempt to attribute to Artemas Ward a variety of positions and attitudes that he did not actually hold, in particular he will be held up as some as an antislavery abolitionist despite his actual behavior. While neither a slave owner nor terribly racist, and while he was responsible for the Compromise of 1786 that preserved Georgia as a self-governing African America state, he had raised little objection to the post-war re-enslavement of the slaves of Patriot owners who had enlisted in the Continental Army without permission. Faced with a South that was deeply unhappy over the situation in Georgia and openly hostile towards petitions to outlaw slavery nationally (this happened OTL) he sought to calm the situation with concessions to the slave states. This included a strong version of the Fugitive Slave Act of 1793 and policies that banned slaves from enlisting in either state militias or the new US Army and made it impossible for new black immigrants to gain American citizenship.

To his credit however, Ward was a strong believer in universal male suffrage and openly campaigned against property qualifications for voting. Unlike Washington he traveled often across the country, visiting all of the thirteen states to encourage national unity and overseeing the incorporation of Vermont as the 14th state. Many of the same figures ended up in Ward’s cabinet as Washington’s albeit with some differences (Jefferson served as Attorney General, John Jay as Secretary of State) and he endorsed many of Hamilton’s financial suggestions (opposed as per OTL by Jefferson). There was a Bank of the United States and early efforts to develop national infrastructure. Most notably however, Ward departed from Washington’s policies in his decision to actively support France during the French Revolutionary Wars against Britain and refrained from issuing any version of Washington’s Proclamation of Neutrality.

Instead Ward permitted Citizen Genet to raise a pro-French militia in the United States and recruit Americans privateers to fight for France while continuing to repay America’s debt to France. This triggered to hostile actions by Britain against American shipping and saw a British policy of encouraging the Western Confederacy to attack American settlers pushing into the Northwest Territory. Ultimately tensions between the United States and the British Empire culminated in Ward’s decision to honor the Treaty of Alliance, drawing the United States into the French Revolutionary Wars in 1798. The war between America and Britain resembled a combination between the Northwest Indian War and the War of 1812, plus an ill-conceived American invasion of Florida. It would draw off British forces to the Canadas and the Caribbean who were deployed to Europe OTL, this (along with some very good French luck) resulted in a very different outcome to the French Revolutionary Wars.

1778_Treaty-of-Alliance-with-France.jpg

If we'd stuck with this alliance instead of hanging France out to dry the way Washington and Hamilton had wanted... but I have no strong feelings on the matter.

I’m not going into too much detail into the alt-French Revolutionary Wars but butterflies saw a different series of events with OTL individuals playing different roles or no roles at all. Robespierre never rose to prominence, instead a shorter but no less intense La Terreur occurred under the leadership of Jean-Paul Marat followed by the rise of saner governments. Napoleon still gained prominence thanks to his leadership abilities that he leveraged to enter politics, but the circumstances that IOTL led to his assuming the title of Caesar and establishing a monarchy never occurred. Instead Napoleon ended up First Consul of a rather authoritarian French Republic (without the need for the OTL coup, it was a semi-voluntary reorganization of the Directorate), successfully led France to victories and launched invasions of Britain and Ireland. While the invasion of Britain was a rapid failure the invasion of Ireland prompted a general Irish uprising that was only suppressed with great difficulty and brutality (France tried to invade Ireland OTL and actually landed troops at one point).

The French Revolutionary Wars (no one calls them the Napoleonic Wars ITTL) ended in 1812 much more satisfactorily for France than OTL. Napoleon preserved the French Republic under his personal dominance (there were at least regular elections and a legal opposition, but no real chance of the First Consul ever actually losing) and Sister Republics in the Netherlands, Italy, and part of Germany. Italy and the alt-Confederation of the Rhine (a Republican affair ITTL) both “elected” Napoleon as their head of state and Spain ended up a client state of France under the shaky rule of Charles IV. While France gained different pieces of various neighbors one of their proudest achievements was the successful prying away of the Channel Islands from British rule.

354px-Jean_Garneray_Marat.jpg

Ah, Jean-Paul Marat. It's difficult to say whether he was actually crazier than Robespierre or not, but I've long cherished the impression that the pain-maddened newspaperman reached heights of madness the lawyer from Arras could only dream of.

For France the legacy of the Revolutionary Wars would be a vast (and overstretched) empire in Europe, the loss of most of its overseas colonies, and a dangerous sense of invincibility.

For Eastern Europe the legacy of the wars will be a continuing Holy Alliance of conservative powers against the liberal threat of France.

For Latin America the legacy of TTL’s Peninsular War would be the emergence of a collection of juntas controlling most of the different Spanish colonies and nominally loyal to the exiled King Ferdinand VII. As in OTL the Portuguese monarchy fled to Brazil, elevated the colony to the status of an equal kingdom, and opted to remain in Brazil even after the withdrawal of French forces from Portugal at the end of the war.

For America the legacy of the “Anglo-American War” would be one of defeat.

The Royal Navy dominated the Americans at sea while the British and their Native allies won victory after victory over the untrained and unprepared US Army in the Northwest Territory, the Canadas, and Spanish Florida. New York was burned from the sea, forcing the government to flee to Philadelphia, and a force out of Canada briefly occupied Boston before sacking the city and withdrawing. The American military was all but hopeless at this point IOTL and ITTL there is no reason why that should be any different. Canada was less populated than OTL but the British garrison no weaker, and it was swiftly reinforced by Britain once the war began. Ward’s second and last term (he died in 1800 both ITTL and OTL and declining health prevented him from running for a third) was badly embarrassed by American military failures, although the American people will opt after his death to put the blame on his generals. America under President Thomas Jefferson agreed to a humiliating peace with Great Britain in 1807 that dropped American claims to disputed territory between Maine and British North America and between Georgia and Spanish Florida. America’s sole consolations were the defeat of the Western Confederation and the withdrawal of British forts from the Northwest Territory (the US eventually got its act together well enough to win victories in those areas).

The attitude in America shifted to a grim sense of national unity tempered by a perception of military inferiority and a widespread fear that Britain’s distraction fighting France was the only thing that prevented a far worse conclusion to the war or even (according to some alarmists, this was never a real possibility) the reconquest of the United States and its forcible return to colonial status. Military experts will be imported from France to help America build up a strong, disciplined, professional armed forces. Both France and America noted the superior firepower of the Ferguson Rifle (whose success in the American Revolution prompted Britain to retain the expensive but otherwise quite effective weapon in general use for British marksmen) and America will eagerly study the advances of the Swiss-French gunsmith Jean Samuel Pauly whose inventions will not be ignored as they were OTL. The need of taxes to pay for this new military will be grudgingly accepted by voices otherwise resistant to such things, and the need for foreign allies- the Treaty of Alliance that Washington set aside in 1793 OTL will remain at least symbolically in effect for as long as France and the United States both continue to exist.

ITTL’s future historians will note Thomas Jefferson’s successful purchase of Louisiana as of the few successes of a generally dismal administration.

What’s that you say? There was another country that was profoundly influenced by the events of the French Revolutionary Wars? Well we’ll get Britain and her little colony in Africa next chapter.

Have no fear.

bTAk7Bx.png

"Hey EBR, do you take constructive criticism on your post-French Revolutionary Wars Europeans borders?"

"No."
 
Did the Dutch get anything is exchange for the Cape?

The return of some Dutch colonies in the Caribbean, but mostly it was France leaning on the Netherlands to give it up so the French could get their colonies back plus the Dutch recognizing that they had no way to make Britain return the Cape.

The Kingdoms of Naples and Sicily were effectively one State from 1738 until the official merging of the states' local governments in 1816. It is like colouring Prussia and Brandenburg in 1740 or Castile and Aragon in 1699 differently.

You should post that in the Worlda basemap thread.:p

This sounds like an interesting start

Thank you.:)
 
Britain losing influence over continental Europe (which is divided between the French sphere (1), and the Holy Alliance (2) which is made up of reactionary absolute monarchies and dominated by Russia, which is the direct rival of Britain over the Ottoman Empire, Persia and Central Asia), will likely push Britain towards more expansion into Africa. To not let the European rivals grow even bigger (by having African colonies of their own), and to get more resources. Not to mention pride.

ITTL, Britain has strong reasons to support the demographic and territorial expansion of Drakia.
 
Interesting... you've pretty much butterflied away much of the US's fear of a strong centralized government, which is needed for it to reach its full potential. Even with OTL US's reluctance to spend on internal infrastructure the average American was shockingly integrated into the world market by the 1820's, and that will only be better TTL with less reluctance for federal funding of things like the Erie Canal. It'll be interesting to see how long France's hegemony can last in Europe, and how German nationalism develops. Seems like Prussia kept the Polish territory from the partition which may have interesting effects.

Also, there's something funny with the threadmarks, post two advances to post one...
 
The Ottomans might be screwed quickly. North, they have Russia and Austria (united, and will stay united by French threat). On the south, they might or might not have the Draka soon (if they expand in North Africa). Moreover, Britain needs support from the Holy Alliance against France (the main threat on European balance and the British Isles). So, to remain in good terms with Russia, Britain might throw the Ottomans under the bus.

Finally, France might be reluctant to risk another war war against coalized Europe (ie. Holy Alliance, likely joined by Britain) just for the Ottomans (whose presence is only useful as a distraction and another target for Austria and Russia). French Republic will be busy enough maintaining its hold on Spain, Portugal, Italy, West Germany and Low Countries.

In short, the Ottomans might have no defenders against the Russian bear.
 
@Ephraim Ben Raphael I'm sure some people might be turned off with the back and forth of "this is what normally happened in OTL versus what is happening in this timeline," due in part to some tonal shifts. Oddly enough though, it feels like a historian from some multiverse group is doing a study of what makes this particular Draka timeline unique from all the others.

Then I remember you are a history teacher/professor, so it kind of makes sense.
 
Looks interesting.As for numbers needed,perhaps the Draka use mineral wealth to set up orphanages in Protestant Europe to take advantage of birth boom and all the wars there/maybe figure a way to recruit Sikhs and other martial peoples from India/incorporate the Baasters into Draka society,like another writer's bushrangers,into the Cossacks of the Drakaian society.Disparate groups forming a country,like the USA
 

Deleted member 67076

So the Spanish American Independence wars not happening? If not, thats a pretty huge change that's going to box in the US. Which I suppose is interesting it having that additional population density turn into being much more politically liberal and antislavery. It fits in with the state focusing on manufacturing and active interventionism more.

The Ottomans may get out of this better if the Tanzimat era reforms can be started earlier; certainly the French have plenty of reasons to remove the Jannisaries and turn the New Army into a good buffer against the Austrians and Russians while the Ottoman state begins centralizing anew.
 
...it's even sneakily ~doubled in size...

Well that ridiculously high number of Loyalist immigrants have to go somewhere.

Britain losing influence over continental Europe (which is divided between the French sphere (1), and the Holy Alliance (2) which is made up of reactionary absolute monarchies and dominated by Russia, which is the direct rival of Britain over the Ottoman Empire, Persia and Central Asia), will likely push Britain towards more expansion into Africa. To not let the European rivals grow even bigger (by having African colonies of their own), and to get more resources. Not to mention pride.

ITTL, Britain has strong reasons to support the demographic and territorial expansion of Drakia.

Just so.;)

I wouldn't characterize it as Britain "supporting Drakian expansion", at least initially. Drakia is a small British colony that hasn't existed for two decades yet, this is expansion is going to be 120 Proof British.

Interesting... you've pretty much butterflied away much of the US's fear of a strong centralized government, which is needed for it to reach its full potential. Even with OTL US's reluctance to spend on internal infrastructure the average American was shockingly integrated into the world market by the 1820's, and that will only be better TTL with less reluctance for federal funding of things like the Erie Canal. It'll be interesting to see how long France's hegemony can last in Europe, and how German nationalism develops. Seems like Prussia kept the Polish territory from the partition which may have interesting effects.

America's fear of strong centralized government isn't totally gone ITTL, and for that matter the form it will take will be akin to OTL times Americans supported a stronger central government- fear of an outside threat leading to agreements over a stronger military. It will be going from the United States "are" to "is" a lot quicker than OTL though.

Also, there's something funny with the threadmarks, post two advances to post one...

Fixed!

How wanked will the draka be will it be to the level of the novels.

Read on and find out.:cool:

But as this isn't the ASB Forum I can confidently say that they won't be invading any alternate timelines.

@Ephraim Ben Raphael I'm sure some people might be turned off with the back and forth of "this is what normally happened in OTL versus what is happening in this timeline," due in part to some tonal shifts. Oddly enough though, it feels like a historian from some multiverse group is doing a study of what makes this particular Draka timeline unique from all the others.

Thank you.:biggrin: I first started experimenting with that tone when I was writing Rebel North and I wanted to make sure that the OTL historical background for some of the more ASB stuff I was doing would be readily apparent to my readers. For this TL I thought I'd take things one step further and embrace it totally.

Then I remember you are a history teacher/professor, so it kind of makes sense.

Not a professor- but I have plans to get there in the future. Currently Social Science Department Chair for a high school (also sole member of the Social Science Department, but who's counting?:p).

Looks interesting.As for numbers needed,perhaps the Draka use mineral wealth to set up orphanages in Protestant Europe to take advantage of birth boom and all the wars there/maybe figure a way to recruit Sikhs and other martial peoples from India/incorporate the Baasters into Draka society,like another writer's bushrangers,into the Cossacks of the Drakaian society.Disparate groups forming a country,like the USA

Thanks. I don't want to give anything away, but the Draka social structure ITTL will be a lot more complex and a lot more reminiscent of OTL colonialism than in the OG Drakaverse.

So the Spanish American Independence wars not happening? If not, thats a pretty huge change that's going to box in the US. Which I suppose is interesting it having that additional population density turn into being much more politically liberal and antislavery. It fits in with the state focusing on manufacturing and active interventionism more.

Let's wait before we write off the Spanish Colonies seeking independence. After all their options are now a puppet Spain, a king in exile, and they're basically running themselves already.

Hope the Draka don't win in TTL, and waiting for more...

:)
 
Sounds a potentially interesting timeline. Just one teeny-weeny suggestion. You have established the Crown Colony of Drakia. Perhaps in TTL the people, when they emerge as such, will be called Drakians and not the (IMHO rather stupid) Sterlingesque Draka? One way of distiguishing this from the rest of the Drakaverse productions?
 
Thomas Cochrane would have been a child at this time. I know it says it was Cochrane in the books but that was just one of many many flaws in S&M Stirling's work.

Maybe Richard Kempenfeld instead, butterfly away his death during the Royal George disaster.

Anyway rant over, watching with interest.
 
Am I interpreting things correctly to say that "no 3/5ths clause" means that southern representation in the House, and consequently in the Electoral College is now based only on the free population (which includes free blacks, but excludes Native Americans as well as slaves)? If so this has a major effect in that the House of Representatives rather rapidly becomes "free" majority compared to OTL and with Georgia being a black majority state this means that the ability of the south to use the Senate, in particular, to call the music on many issues is diminished sooner. Issues like tariffs, internal improvements/infrastructure, and others will be decided in favor of national/northern rather than parochial southern interests sooner. The issue of new states, and one slave for every free state admitted will fall apart sooner as OTL this was unsustainable in terms of forcing slavery on areas where it was unwanted and/or economically uncompetitive...
 
Chapter 3
painting-of-cotton-mill-town-in-lancashire-19th-century-700x390.jpg

Chapter 3

There was never any real chance of the French invasion of Britain succeeding. The Royal Navy rapidly cut off the initial landing force, sank attempts to resupply and reinforce it, and British forces converged from across the island to destroy it. But the psychological impact on the British people cannot be understated. Not only had the French managed to successfully land troops and even capture a moderate-sized British port, but once cut off from resupply the French troops resorted to pillaging to keep themselves supplied. Once they realized their defeat was going to be inevitable they turned to a panicked spiteful rampage, devastating the area where they made their last stand. The battle for Ireland proved much more hard-fought, with the United Irishmen proving a bitterer foe than the French expedition who backed their uprising.

800px-Battle_of_Killala_1798.JPG

The United Irishmen marching into battle. Did you that there was a time when Irish independence was supported by both Catholics and Protestants in Ireland? Sadly it will end in sectarianism just as it did OTL.

For the British people the events of the French Revolutionary Wars shook their faith in British invincibility and planted very real fears of a future and more successful French invasion (ironically at the exact same time when Americans were fearmongering over the possibility of a future and more successful British invasion). The loss of the Channel Islands- integral British territory- was the final humiliation, even if the French, Dutch, and occasionally Spanish colonies that Britain acquired as a result of the wars were almost certainly more valuable. (Britain had little colonial competition in the aftermath of the French Revolutionary Wars- the Netherlands and Spain were French clients, Sweden and Denmark-Norway were focusing on the Holy Alliance, the Holy Alliance was focusing on France, Portugal was consumed by internal strife, and France was too busy in Europe to do any more by way of colonizing than back mostly unsuccessful attempts by their Spanish client retain control over its colonies- it held the Philippines and Puerto Rico and nothing else. The Spanish monarchy-in-exile tried to hang on to those of its New World colonies that it could, but Ferdinand’s incompetence saw all save for Cuba slip away.)

But the British were not stupid- they could hardly have built the empires they did IOTL and ITTL if they had been- and in typical British fashion Parliament appointed a commission to consider Britain’s failures during the war and how to avoid them in the future.

The Russell Commission was named for and headed by Thomas Macnamara Russell, a minor figure from OTL who played a key role in the defeat of the French Invasion ITTL and was catapulted to a degree of fame and herodom reserved in our universe for men such as Nelson. Russell himself played relatively little part in the Commission’s deliberations, his role being a largely ceremonial one, but crucially it was he who rephrased the goals of the Commission in a way that would echo down the ages.

The questions the Commission needed answer (according to Russell) were three;

1. How can Britain better prevent future invasions?

2. How can Britain better respond to future invasions if they cannot be prevented?

3. Given that it is impossible to know for certain what sort of weapons and tactics will be used in future wars, what can Britain do to strengthen itself in preparation for future wars in general?

The Commission should not- Russell argued- waste its time on blame and recriminations over the conduct of individuals during the invasion. Instead it should emphasize what Britain can do to better fight France (or really anyone) in the future.

258px-Admiral_Sir_Francis_Geary_top.jpg

Admiral Thomas Macnamara Russell of the Royal Navy

Government committees usually get a bad rap whatever country you’re in, but they exist for a reason and that reason is that they work (better than having one individual take their place at least) on average, and the Russell Commission proved quite successful. Its finally report made a variety of recommendations, but two stand out in response to the third of Russel’s questions; a call for wider adoption of breechloading rifles (or at least a serious project to develop a cheaper and more easily manufactured version of the Ferguson Rifle), and the correct identification of the military benefits of greater industrialization. These may seem like common sense observations to my readers- and indeed governments identified similar things IOTL- but Britain ITTL made the decision to turn them into policy in an unprecedented way. The simultaneous British, French, and American investments into breechloading rifles will spur rapid advancement- particularly as they are aware of rival projects in each other’s countries and will not stop with practical breechloaders. They are a way off yet, but the technological race that began with breechloading rifles will continue to yield deadly fruits in ever newer and unexpected ways.

As for industry, Great Britain realized that regardless of tactics or technology, industry will always be an advantage for the country that has more of it. In response they started launching programs that we will generously compare to the Five Year Plans of Nehru (as opposed to certain far bloodier and more unpleasant five year plans from certain other countries). Such programs- happening as they did in Britain in the early 19th century- would be far less sophisticated than those of the good Mr. Nehru and they had issues (sometimes quite severe) with corruption and profiteering, but they will achieve success. Aimed at developing heavy industry and spurred on by the fear of French Republicans/Irish Rebels/American Traitors on British shores they will see the still young industrial revolution skyrocket ahead. On the other side of the Channel France will answer with its own crash industrialization programs out of a concern over being left behind.

And of course, none of this occurred in a vacuum- the Industrial Race and the Arms Race will be noticed by other countries, spurring participation by America and Prussia and other nations in time. The Separate-verse is on track to be more industrialized more quickly than OTL and to advance more rapidly down some (but not other) technological paths.

luddites-promo-hism173_vv243.jpg

National governments promoted industrialization IOTL, but this sort of crash industrialization is happening much earlier and much more frantically than OTL.

Drakia was initially left out of the Industrial Race and its participation in the Arms Race both then and later will mostly consist of the Drakians eagerly and rapidly adopting other people’s inventions, but the French Revolutionary Wars and their aftermath were still tremendously influential on the development of the young colony.

Drakia was only peripherally involved in the FRWs- the colony spent much of the time engaged in wars with neighboring Native African peoples as it expanded to accommodate an ongoing wave of mass immigration (those 95,000 Loyalists still in the process of immigrating in, most now from temporary homes in the British Caribbean)- but its inhabitants eagerly consumed news and reports of the fighting, particularly in North America. Accounts (often exaggerated or invented) of the exploits of the Drakian Legion, a small unit of Drakians fighting in Canada and New England, were devoured and retold. For the Loyalists who had fled their homes in the Thirteen Colonies for Southern Africa the Anglo-American War offered the promise of revenge and the Legion gained a name for brutality against American “traitors” in incidents such as the sack of Boston. Condemnations and hostile dissections of Republicanism as an ideology- whether French or America- abounded in Drakian broadsheets and pamphlets of the period and doctrines of equality were denounced from religious pulpits. The Loyalist Ideology that existed among the OTL exiles to Canada began to crystalize into something different in Drakia, but still had only taken the first steps down the road to Naldorssen and its final form.

Of particular influence to Drakia during this time period was French immigration.

Later Drakians will make much of the immigration from France after the French Revolution, presenting it as a wave of French nobility whose blood (once mixed with that of the exiled British Aristocrats of American) created a “nation of nobility”. In point of fact only one major French noble- the Duc de Choiseul- actually immigrated to Drakia after the French Revolution and a mere smattering of minor nobility joined him. The overwhelming majority of the French immigrants to Drakia were actually commoners, conservative French peasants from Brittany and other parts of northwestern France. During the 1820s and 30s they fled France in droves, seeking to escape political repression on the part of Napoleon whose willingness to tolerate a tame republican opposition did not extend to tolerating an opposition that was actively counter-revolutionary. Many were former members of the Red Army, a monarchist insurgent group whose rhetoric, symbolism, and name will be borrowed by conservative and reactionary rebels across the France and its client states.

200px-Coeur-chouan.jpeg

The Catholic and Royal Armies of Vendee, Brittany, and Normandy (aka the Red Army) were French Royalist conservatives who fought against the French Republic OTL even though most of their members were peasant and virtually all commoners. You know that thing in a TL were an OTL name, phrase, or symbol ends up having a totally opposite meaning for reasons of irony? We're doing that thing.

Britain at this point in time was in the middle of a truly staggering wave of anti-Catholicism and Francophobia for obvious reasons, making it deeply unwelcome to any common French immigrants regardless of how conservative they were. Canada- which was already less Anglophone than OTL- had zero desire for additional Francophone inhabitants, and while America was undergoing a period of general Francophilia and considerably more tolerant attitudes towards Catholicism, most conservative French peasants weren’t interested in fleeing one republic for another closely allied to their former homeland.

Instead a sizeable minority migrated to Drakia.

It’s ironic that Drakia was so welcoming to the new French immigrants given their earlier history of Xenophobia- the Drakians had been deeply hostile to “un-English influences” upon their initial arrival in the Cape and their efforts to repress and eliminate Afrikaner culture would spur TTL’s Boer exodus. It’s difficult to think of a group regarded as more “un-English” than the French, but the Drakians embraced them with open arms. The French peasants were hard workers happy to help with the labor needed to settle Southern Africa and willing to take up arms in the constant struggle against the tribes as population pressure from immigration drove Drakia to expand. What truly endeared the French immigrants to the Drakians however, was something more fundamental.

These French were fellow loyalists who- like the Americans Loyalists- had fled retribution at the hands of a victorious Republic. They shared Drakian values of monarchism, belief in the need for a social hierarchy, and the central nature of religion to society. Drakian society identified with the experiences of the French Royalists, sympathized with their treatment at the hands of the French Republic, and regarded them as kindred spirits. The French were welcomed with open arms and consciously integrated into the colony.

It is ironic to note that periods of Francophilia swept both the United States of America and the Crown Colony of Drakia at roughly the same time in the early 19th century, with American obsessing over Republican France while Drakias favored a romanticized and largely imaginary version of the Ancien Regime. This Francophilia would have a permanent influence on the culture, identity, and politics of both countries, but much more so on Drakia which absorbed large numbers of actual Frenchmen.

Claude_de_Choiseul_%281760-1838%29.jpg

The Duc de Choiseul did a fair bit of wandering OTL- even ending up in India at one point- and it's faintly plausible he might somehow find himself in South Africa.

Further immigration to Drakia drove additional expansion and conflicts with the Natives, and it was in the 1820s that the Drakian concept of the “citizen-soldier” began to emerge, a belief that any rights (which they did not regard as inherent in anyone) were earned through fulfillment of responsibilities- most notably the responsibility to serve the state by fighting for it. It was a theory closely connected to the European feudal concept of noble responsibilities to protect the common people present in France and Noblesse Oblige, as of course the largely common Drakians conceived of themselves as filling the role of the nobility in their emerging social order (even if they did not yet begun to assert the doctrine that all Drakians were nobility). More practically the citizen-soldier was a response to Drakia’s demand for soldiers to fight the Natives coupled with the inability of its economy to support a real standing army. Instead social pressures and formal policy by the British colonial governors pushed most Drakian men to learn basic fighting skills, making it possible for Drakia to mobilize small units of unprofessional soldiers on a part time basis to defend communities or for brief campaigns against Native Africans tribes. These disorganized and semi-trained troops were inferior in quality to European or even the increasingly professional American forces, but they were better than nothing and enabled a process of gradual and piecemeal expansion.

Alliances with Native Tribes proved essential to victory in the Early Wars of Expansion. Peoples such as the Ndebele and the Fengu had been displaced by the Zulus in the expansion of the Zulu kingdom and were often happy to fight with the Drakians against their common Zulu and Xhosa enemies. Drakia focused on expanding into the territory of larger regional powers (the Zulus, Xhosa, and the Swazi) while respecting the territory of their weaker Native allies, whose land was usually not the best anyway. Professional British military assistance was often necessary regardless to keep things on track, but Drakia and its clients controlled about eighty-percent of OTL South Africa by the early 1830s. Increasingly the Drakian society that identified Drakian colonists with the nobility of traditional European culture began to regard conquered natives as naturally fitting into the slot of the subservient peasantry (even though for most either their ancestors or they themselves had been subservient peasants back in Europe).

Drakia’s first territorial gain that came not at the expense of the African Natives but a European power was from Portugal.

Portugal sold Mozambique to Britain after a series of unfortunate events, beginning with the devastation of Portugal by multiple French invasions during the French Revolutionary Wars, a period of effective British rule during which the Portuguese economy was subject to British economic needs, followed by a revolution that forced the King to return to Portugal from Brazil, a civil war between Absolutists led by the King’s younger son and Liberals who wanted to maintain a constitutional monarchy under the King that was won by the Absolutists and ended in the King’s death (OTL it was just a failed coup that the King won), then a second civil war when Pedro I (Brazilian independence was delayed long enough ITTL that the two countries were still united at this point) led a Brazilian army to invade Portugal and avenge his father’s death at his brother’s hands (or rather the hands of one of his followers acting without orders, but who’s counting) ending in Pedro’s defeat (OTL he won and gave up the crown of Brazil for Portugal), and then a final civil war when Portuguese radicals attempted to overthrow the deeply unpopular absolute monarchy of Miguel I and replace it with a republic (OTL this was an uprising calling for constitutional monarchy against a different monarch entirely, but the butterflies have been at work).

Miguel_I_and_Adelaide_of_L%C3%B6wenstein-Wertheim-Rosenberg%2C_titular_king_and_queen_of_Portugal.jpg

King Miguel I "the Usurper" of Portugal.
Stirling having Portugal sell its African colonies to Britain was actually one of the less ASB parts of the Drakaverse. Portugal had a truly miserable time of it after the Napoleonic Wars and it doesn't take a lot of alternations to the timeline to make that worse.

With Portugal devastated by repeated wars, most of its colonies (including Angola and Portuguese Guinea) in the hands of a Brazilian Empire whose monarch still claimed the throne of Portugal, and King Miguel’s government fighting for its life against republican rebels, the bankrupt usurper chose to sell Mozambique- the last major colony that still recognized his government- to Britain to raise much needed funds. With the purchase of Mozambique in 1834 Britain was able to open the former Portuguese colony to Drakian settlement, relieving population pressures in the colony and bringing the Early Wars of Expansion to an end.

Attitudes in Great Britain were generally positive regarding Drakia at this point in time. The Drakians were vocally loyal and had actively pushed to expand the territory of the British Empire with minimal investment by Britain itself. True, they had widespread slavery but it wasn’t terribly intense slavery- most Drakian farmers had a couple of slaves to help out on the farm while better off families had a few domestic slaves- as the mass plantation slavery of places like the Caribbean and the American South was uneconomical in South Africa. British legal protections had even granted slaves in the colony the rights to marry and live with their families, and restricted how they could be punished. Drakia lobbied successfully to be exempted from the Slavery Abolition Act of 1835 along with the territories of the East India Company, Ceylon, and Saint Helena, but it was generally understood that this exemption would be temporary and that slavery would shortly be abandoned there.

Maybe once the ratcheting tensions with France and America have been dealt with they can start firmly but politely bringing them in line with the rest of the Empire.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top