It won't take that long. Japan is revanchist, allied with Drakia and right there.


Chapter 37 summarized both sides' orbital and suborbital weapons, and both sides are well-practiced and used to biological warfare so that's an area of active research as well.
Fair enough. If Japan brings China into the war, then the Alliance wins, at least eventually.
 
What year is the question? And how much of the west?
1938 on both sides. This much of the west plus the corresponding Mexican and Canadian territories.
OIP.ROOScaYPD2sQzJYaB2DTVgHaH0


Admittedly I thought about the two worlds merging during the 1930's and the chaos that ensues.
 
Hear: The observers speak among themselves. What a grand Situation it was!

Considering the level of orbital infrastructure in place at this point both the Pact of Blood and the AfD will learn that the Chinese have detonated an absolutely enormous bomb effectively immediately, from the flash and after effects alone. And as this is an above ground test they and both sides have extensive civil defence measures in place in a chemical warfare heavy environment they must have lots of air sensors so they will probably know the bomb caused a radiation surge fairly quickly as well. At that point it's a race to see who can field a deployable weapon first and it's a race the AfD should win.
 
The first words of TTL is quoting a history book from 2010. So I don’t think the world is gonna burn, at least to that extent.
Plot twist: it's a history book from the moon colony turned nation in exile... kinda like that one short story by Arthur Clarke where the protag was revealed to be on the moon staring at a destroyed earth...
 
At that point it's a race to see who can field a deployable weapon first and it's a race the AfD should win.
Be a race to second place. It took three years for the Manhattan Project to produce a weapon from a decent foundation of fundamental science.

In three years, depending on when this interlude is, a superweapon war will have been long since been fought and concluded.

Plot twist: it's a history book from the moon colony turned nation in exile... kinda like that one short story by Arthur Clarke where the protag was revealed to be on the moon staring at a destroyed earth...
The moon colonies are described as being only quasi-self sufficient. I assumed this meant something like full oxygen and water recycling, maybe full food recycling, and some rapid prototyping for simple custom parts, but not a self-contained industrial base.

Any post-Apocalypse moon colony is going to be too busy bootstrapping to self-sufficiency to be concerned with history, or a vacuum preserved tomb.
 
Last edited:
I just realised this: there's also this possibility of the Burmese being tired of Indian dominance. They can get a funny Situationist idea or two along with the Cambodians if the AfD's dice rolls a low enough number.

Also, there's no real mention on how the Confederation have stabilized itself since its formation, what with it being dominated by Manchurians and Koreans in population and the legacy of military franchise still being prevalent since its inception. While the political system may have provided for stability, there are still those groups right, right?

On the other hand, aren't the Czechs a practical puppet of the Pan-Europeans, if just not a formally diplomatic one at that that with German government basically relenting on them doing so in their Drakian overture?
 
I posted a world map a couple of chapters ago. Things have changed a little since, but not much;

View attachment 591271
OK, changes since map...
Colombia to *forced* neutrality.
Confederation of East Asia to AFD. (Note, functionally surrounded by countries that aren't AFD.
United Kingdom to sort of near AFD, but being *watched* more than even the standard Dictatorships in the Jakarta Pact.
Japan to Pact of Blood (but long leash), the way that the UK used to have (mostly because, like the UK, no land border with the Pact)
Tibet to Situationist.
(that it?)

Also Naval Forces...
I'm guessing USA 1, India 2, Draka 3, Japan 4, Brazil 5, UPSA 6???
 
This TL basically has the entire concept of an exclusive national state be a failure:
The nations that succeeded are those that work with others and all of the existing states are multi-ethnic to a degree!
People from this this TL would probablyfin the exclusively national and microstates that we have in OTL weird and non functional.
 
Also Naval Forces...
I'm guessing USA 1, India 2, Draka 3, Japan 4, Brazil 5, UPSA 6???
Japan would be third with Drakia in second. The USA would most likely be in first as they don't have to deal with a European land war's effects.
Has India had enough time and development to build a navy that can beat the IJN?

I'd put it as: USA 1, Japan 2, Drakia 3, India 4 - though India and Drakia would probably be relatively close and perhaps could be swapped.
 

Deleted member 96212

This TL basically has the entire concept of an exclusive national state be a failure:
The nations that succeeded are those that work with others and all of the existing states are multi-ethnic to a degree!
People from this this TL would probablyfin the exclusively national and microstates that we have in OTL weird and non functional.

Eh, I don't really think so; I think if people from ATL saw OTL they'd find a Drakia parallel in shitholes like North Korea or historical regimes like Stalin's Russia or the Axis Powers. It's not so much that Drakia is an "exclusive national state" but that it's militantly racist, expansionist, and dictatorial.
 
Eh, I don't really think so; I think if people from ATL saw OTL they'd find a Drakia parallel in shitholes like North Korea or historical regimes like Stalin's Russia or the Axis Powers. It's not so much that Drakia is an "exclusive national state" but that it's militantly racist, expansionist, and dictatorial.

I didn't refer to Drakia I refereed to other mega states!
A strong and large state is needed so your enemies or mosters like Pact of Blood don't enslave you!
 
So in the event of an Alliance victory, what happens to the former Drakia territory? Are we talking full conquest or focus on creating independent nations?
 
So in the event of an Alliance victory, what happens to the former Drakia territory? Are we talking full conquest or focus on creating independent nations?
Probably an attemp to create independent nation, but most of the former drakian territories will be such a mess that I am sure the AfD will not want to be anywhere near
 
The peace was narrowly saved by the fact that Ulysses Kobold genuinely did not want a war- he had a realistic understanding of the Empire’s capabilities, their enemies’ capabilities, and how even victory was likely to be devastatingly pyrrhic. So the Polemarch reached out to the only American he had ever had any real personal contact with- an aging retired fleet admiral whose presidential aspirations had ended with disappointment, but who still had plenty of contacts in New York City. Klein’s back-channeling between the Polemarch and the President (who also didn’t want a shooting war) allowed the two governments to back down from the brink and work out a compromise deal that preserved the peace.
It's quite ironic how the man that started the First Draco-American War played a large part in delaying the third. The conversation between Klein and Kobold must have been quite awkward, especially since I imagine the Drakian government under Stoker must have tried to assassinate Klein a number of times.

For both sides Lunar colonies generally consisted of small facilities reminiscent of OTL’s Antarctic Research Stations whose purpose was to reinforce territorial claims and maybe do some science on the side, but by 1980 Empyrean (the capital of Drakian Luna, located at Peary Crater) had a permanent population of 176 people and Port Liberty (the capital of Alliance Luna, located at Malapert Crater) had over 2,000~.
I wonder if during the Final War, we might see astronauts fighting on the Moon and trying to invade each other's outposts.
 
Holy shit. Are the Situationists passing their nukes off as an artistic piece?

Nah, that's just how the lens they're filtering it through ideologically.

Speaking of which, what are the main ways Tibet's regime differs from China, given they're much more radical situationists? And for the matter, how much are things influenced by how underdeveloped the country was before? Is China actively uplifting them?

Tibet is actively attempting to eliminate the "work concept" and money, and their economy is, um, struggling is putting it mildly. They're relying on Chinese aid, but trying to avoid putting in place the kind of economic reforms China wants.

Dang, forgot Russia was allied with Drakia. Still, if European Russia was so devastated the capitol is STILL in Omsk and they're actively getting rid of their non-Russian ethnicities, then that suggests they're a good bit weaker than their geographical extent indicates. If the AfD is smart they won't feed their troops to General Winter. Wonder if there will be enough Caucasians and Central Asians left to launch an uprising?

Well that's as of 1965. By 1980 they've had another 15 years to recover. They're still a lot weaker than the OTL Soviet Union at the same time.

Also I hope to god the Czechs don't fully cozy up with Aurica. That'll end badly.

The Czechs know that if war breaks out Eastern/Central Europe will be right on the front line, and they aren't confident that Germany, France, and the AfD would be able to protect them. Czech diplomacy is about hedging their bets so that they can either keep their neutrality or join the Pact if it wins.

There is BIOS-3, which demonstrated bioregenerative life support with a high degree of closure as early as the 1970s OTL.

Everything after that--bulk spacelift and lunar construction--is an engineering and logistics challenge, but not insurmountable and certainly doesn't require more technology than has been demonstrated ITTL, or wasn't avaliable in 1970 OTL.

Yeah, you can do some really impressive stuff in space with 21st or even mid to late-20th century technology if you're willing to spend the money and the resources.

1938 on both sides. This much of the west plus the corresponding Mexican and Canadian territories.
OIP.ROOScaYPD2sQzJYaB2DTVgHaH0


Admittedly I thought about the two worlds merging during the 1930's and the chaos that ensues.

It's hard to see how the RU and the rump SaB USA could interact in any way other than a war.

Also, there's no real mention on how the Confederation have stabilized itself since its formation, what with it being dominated by Manchurians and Koreans in population and the legacy of military franchise still being prevalent since its inception. While the political system may have provided for stability, there are still those groups right, right?


Yeah, I really should address them. They're still kind of shaky and aid from the rest of the AfD has been essential to them hanging in there.

On the other hand, aren't the Czechs a practical puppet of the Pan-Europeans, if just not a formally diplomatic one at that that with German government basically relenting on them doing so in their Drakian overture?

They are not puppets, they are just very weak militarily and being very careful with their diplomacy.

OK, changes since map...
Colombia to *forced* neutrality.
Confederation of East Asia to AFD. (Note, functionally surrounded by countries that aren't AFD.
United Kingdom to sort of near AFD, but being *watched* more than even the standard Dictatorships in the Jakarta Pact.
Japan to Pact of Blood (but long leash), the way that the UK used to have (mostly because, like the UK, no land border with the Pact)
Tibet to Situationist.
(that it?)

Yeah, that's pretty spot on. The UK is positioned a little like OTL Yugoslavia during the Cold War.

This TL basically has the entire concept of an exclusive national state be a failure:
The nations that succeeded are those that work with others and all of the existing states are multi-ethnic to a degree!
People from this this TL would probablyfin the exclusively national and microstates that we have in OTL weird and non functional.

That reflects my personal views. I think that being willing to work with and accept other groups gives your country a big advantage over nations that insist on being exclusive. Even Drakia is working with non-white ethnicities via the Honorary White Citizens.

Has India had enough time and development to build a navy that can beat the IJN?

I'd put it as: USA 1, Japan 2, Drakia 3, India 4 - though India and Drakia would probably be relatively close and perhaps could be swapped.

That looks accurate to me.

@Ephraim Ben Raphael

What is the current map of the world?

The border haven't changed much since 1965, it's just the alliances that have shifted a little.

It's quite ironic how the man that started the First Draco-American War played a large part in delaying the third. The conversation between Klein and Kobold must have been quite awkward, especially since I imagine the Drakian government under Stoker must have tried to assassinate Klein a number of times.

Oh, Klein was very cognizant as to the irony and took great pleasure in the fact that Drakia was now asking him for things.
 
So the next update is a three-parter;

(1) a brief chapter
(2) a long interlude
(3) a "dice rolling" interlude

You guys want them all at once, or spread out across three days, or spread out across three hours, or what? I'm down for whatever.
 
Top