What's with the gap between Dacia and Danube?
That wasnt Dacian territory, in our timrline it was almost turned into a province under Aurelius. However it would take additional campaigns to subdue that little region.
What's with the gap between Dacia and Danube?
If you mean with the campaign map, it's to show Rome conquered it in one of my previous posts.What's with the gap between Dacia and Danube?
Yeah, I honestly can't keep up with his names. I'm going to call him Octavianus if or when he is adopted.@FlaviusOdoacer only nit pick i can see is that at this point Octavian was still Gaius Octavius Thurinus, not Octavianus. But overall very good, im enjoying it!
Caesar wanted to make Brutus a consul in the future, and he 'caught' the plot to assassinate him. If Caesar knew Brutus had been involved he would be far stricter but he trusts Brutus like a son right now.Really appreciate the frequent maps! You're the only one I've seen (in my very short time here, granted) that does this, please keep it up!
EDIT: In OTL, Julius did NOT trust Brutus, but hoped to "reform" him. Not sure Julius would trust Brutus to be alone with Antonius ...
Killing Lepidus was apart of Cassius' plan due to fears if Antony survived he would call Lepidus to send in his legion which was not far from Rome at the time to restore order and kill the conspirators. Brutus revealed the plot, as I said, because he disagreed with purging the main Caesarian leaders as that would most likely lead to the repealing of nearly all legislation passed by the Caesarians.A couple of things: killing Lepidus would never be in the plan of the Liberators as they can hope to work with him (Lepidus is fully loyal to Caesar but he is married to one of the three half-sisters of Brutus, while the other two are married to Cassius and to Publius Servilius Vatia Isauricus, another important and loyal Caesarian).
The Brutus to which Caesar was really close (and who was almost a son for him) most likely is Decimus Brutus, who was a secondary heir in Caesar’s will and was another of the “Liberatores”, more specifically the one sent to persuade Caesar to go at the Senate that day. Still the prospect of killing also Antony - who, while unable to rule Rome decently, was Caesar’s most loyal lieutenant and was well loved by the men under his command - can be enough for making Brutus’ vacillating. Still I think who Servilia (aka Brutus’ mother, a well know mistress of Caesar) discovering the plot (maybe listening unseen to a conversation of Brutus with Cassius and/or Porcia -wife of Brutus and daughter of Servilia’s half-brother Cato the Younger) and revealing everything to Caesar asking him to spare her son and son-in-law would be a better option...
Apologies on missing that, been focusing on schoolwork. New posts will come on Friday.Will be making two TL posts tomorrow.
It's fine. Take your time.(•‿•)Apologies on missing that, been focusing on schoolwork. New posts will come on Friday.
Wouldn't Caesar also ask for the remaining known prisoners from Carrhae to be returned as well? The eagle standards are all well and good, but what about the people who carried them? It wouldn't be asking all that much, all things considered.
Wouldn't Caesar also ask for the remaining known prisoners from Carrhae to be returned as well? The eagle standards are all well and good, but what about the people who carried them? It wouldn't be asking all that much, all things considered.
That would be one thing. I also doubt that Caesar would settle for anything less then defensible borders in what would today be Eastern Iraq or Western Iran even if he was going only for single or double as Trajan did instead of the home run Alexander went for.