Nabre'l'Adeli
Banned
What would the seagoing nations of the world, and their cities citizens, do?
Move the cities inland perhaps?
How significantly is reasonable?
Move the cities inland perhaps?
How significantly is reasonable?
Build boats?Move the cities inland. Yeah, good for the nations that have 'inland' spaces. What do we archipelago-dwelling people do?
Or those of us who live in deserterfied countrys.Move the cities inland. Yeah, good for the nations that have 'inland' spaces. What do we archipelago-dwelling people do?
Wouldn't the sea cause them to be non-desert once it reached the deser, de-desrtifying the coast? Or would the wait not work for those waiting?Or those of us who live in deserterfied countrys.
It depends on the type of current that is going nere the coast. For example I live in Western Australia, and one of the reasions that we have so much deserts in our state is that there is a cold water current along the coast.Wouldn't the sea cause them to be non-desert once it reached the deser, de-desrtifying the coast? Or would the wait not work for those waiting?
I never said it is a good thing. I'm just asking, what WOULD HAPPEN! Ur supposed to tell me, I don't know, thats why one asks questions.
You can still go--if you like diving.Also, if you fancy a holiday in the Maldives - do it soon!
I do think it would boost our economy, though. Even more ships would be able to go down the Rhine (because it would cover most of Southern Holland, presumably), and we can tax those.
Only ice on land increases sea level when it melts off into the sea. Ice floating in sea water displaces the same weight as it would if it melted (mass remains constant). Although ice on land displaces the land (a bit) so that when it melts the land rises (a bit).The Arctic and Antartic ice 'sheets' are said to be breaking up faster than expected. All this will add to the volume of water that makes up the seas of the world.